Search Results

Search found 36013 results on 1441 pages for 'public fields'.

Page 435/1441 | < Previous Page | 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442  | Next Page >

  • Simple Java math operations

    - by user1730056
    I'm making a BMI calculator that doesn't seem to be working. The math operations work if i just do something like w/h, but once i had the brackets, it returns an error. If i change the variables w and h and use a constant number, the operation works. Another problem is that although i'm making result a double, it seems to be rounding to the nearest int. Could someone tell me what I'm doing wrong here? public class ass10 { public static void main(String[] args) { bmi(223,100); } public static bmi(int w, int h){ double result; result = (w/(h*h))*703 System.out.println(result) } }

    Read the article

  • Inserting equation numbers macro

    - by krzych
    I want to insert equations into Word 2010. I'm inserting the center-aligned equations and then want to add a number to the same line, which will be aligned to the right hand side of the page. I'm having a problem with setting the alignment of the number to the right with equation aligned to center. My code is currently only inserting the number without the correct alignment: Sub EqnNumber() Selection.TypeText Text:="(" Selection.Fields.Add Range:=Selection.Range, Type:=wdFieldEmpty, _ Text:="STYLEREF \s ""Naglówek 1"" ", PreserveFormatting:=True Selection.TypeText Text:="." Selection.Fields.Add Range:=Selection.Range, Type:=wdFieldEmpty, _ Text:="SEQ Rysunek \* ARABIC \s 1", PreserveFormatting:=True Selection.TypeText Text:=")" End Sub

    Read the article

  • Delphi 2010 - Why can't I declare an abstract method with a generic type parameter?

    - by James
    I am trying to do the following in Delphi 2010: TDataConverter = class abstract public function Convert<T>(const AData: T): string; virtual; abstract; end; However, I keep getting the following compiler error: E2533 Virtual, dynamic and message methods cannot have type parameters I don't quite understand the reason why I can't do this. I can do this in C# e.g. public abstract class DataConverter { public abstract string Convert<T>(T data); } Anyone know the reasoning behind this?

    Read the article

  • A better and faster way for eval?

    - by user1707250
    I want to build my queries dynamically and use the following snippet: --snip-- module.exports = { get : function(req, res, next) { var queryStr = "req.database.table('locations').get(parseInt(req.params.id))"; if (req.params.id) { if (req.fields) { queryStr += '.pick(' + req.fieldsStr + ')'; } console.log(queryStr); eval(queryStr).run(function(result) { console.log(result); res.send(result); }); } else if (!req.params.id) { --snip-- However introducing eval opens up my code to injection (req.fields is filled with url parameters) and I see the response time of my app increase from 7 to 11ms Is there a smarter way to accomplish what I did here? Please advice.

    Read the article

  • Using generic type from other generic parameter

    - by DEHAAS
    Hi, I have a question about .net generics. Consider the following code: public class Test<TKey> { TKey Key { get; set; } } public class Wrapper<TValue, TKey> where TValue : Test<TKey> { public TValue Value { get; set; } } Now, when using this code, I could do something like this: Wrapper<Test<int>, int> wrapper = new Wrapper<Test<int>, int>(); The int type parameter has to be provided twice. Is it possible to modify the Wrapper definition, to require TValue to be a generic type, and use this 'nested' generic type parameter insted of the TKey type parameter?

    Read the article

  • Is the method that I am using for retrieval in my generic list optimized

    - by fishhead
    At some time there will be a large amount of records, about 50,000. with that in mind is the method GetEquipmentRecord up to the task. thanks for you opinions. public enum EquipShift { day, night }; public class EquipStatusList : List<EquipStatus> { string SerialFormat = "yyyyMMdd"; int _EquipmentID; string _DateSerial; EquipShift _Shift; public EquipStatus GetEquipmentRecord(int equipmentID, EquipShift shift, DateTime date) { _DateSerial = date.ToString(SerialFormat); _Shift = shift; _EquipmentID = equipmentID; return this.Find(checkforEquipRecord); } bool checkforEquipRecord(EquipStatus equip) { if ((equip.EquipmentID == _EquipmentID) && (equip.Shift == _Shift) && (equip.Date.ToString(SerialFormat) == _DateSerial)) return true; else return false; } }

    Read the article

  • [C++] Question on Virtual Methods

    - by bobber205
    IF both methods are declared as virtual, shouldn't both instances of Method1() that are called be the derived class's Method1()? I am seeing BASE then DERIVED called each time. I am doing some review for an interview and I want to make sure I have this straight. xD class BaseClass { public: virtual void Method1() { cout << "Method 1 BASE" << endl; } }; class DerClass: public BaseClass { public: virtual void Method1() { cout << "Method 1 DERVIED" << endl; } }; DerClass myClass; ((BaseClass)myClass).Method1(); myClass.Method1(); Method 1 BASE Method 1 DERVIED

    Read the article

  • How does the below program work in c++?

    - by Srinivasa Varadan
    I have just created 2 pointers which has undefined behavior and try to invoke a class member function which has no object created ? I don't understand this? #include<iostream> using namespace std; class Animal { public: void talk() { cout<<"I am an animal"<<endl; } }; class Dog : public Animal { public: void talk() { cout<<"bark"<<endl; } }; int main() { Animal * a; Dog * d; d->talk(); a->talk(); }

    Read the article

  • Implement abstract class as a local class? pros and cons

    - by sinec
    Hi, for some reason I'm thinking on implementing interface within a some function(method) as local class. Consider following: class A{ public: virtual void MethodToOverride() = 0; }; A * GetPtrToAImplementation(){ class B : public A { public: B(){} ~B(){} void MethodToOverride() { //do something } }; return static_cast<A *>(new B()); } int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { A * aInst = GetPtrToAImplementation(); aInst->MethodToOverride(); delete aInst; return 0; } the reason why I'm doing this are: I'm lazy to implement class (B) in separate files MethodToOverride just delegates call to other class Class B shouldn't be visible to other users no need to worry about deleting aInst since smart pointers are used in real implementation So my question is if I'm doing this right? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Why can't I register a custom model binder for a List<int>?

    - by quarksoup
    I have an action that looks like public ActionResult GetUsers(List<int> userIds) {//do stuff} The list of userIds can become quite long, so I want to use Json.Net to deserialize it. To do so I created an IModelBinder implementation, which works fine for other objects, but never gets called for a List. The IModelBind looks like this public class JsonBinder : System.Web.Mvc.IModelBinder { public object BindModel(System.Web.Mvc.ControllerContext controllerContext, System.Web.Mvc.ModelBindingContext bindingContext) { //Do model binding stuff using Json.Net } } And I register this model binder with this line ModelBinders.Binders.Add(typeof(List<int>), new JsonBinder()); However the JsonBinder is never called. Why is this? Should I be using a ValueProvider?

    Read the article

  • How to write an unit test for WCF behaviors?

    - by katie77
    I am new to unit testing. How do I write a unit test for a method when I am extending a WCF behavior. Since I am not sure of when the class is being instantiated, or I can not change the method signature. In the behavior implementation, I am getting the header and looking up a value in the config. public class IncomingValidator : IDispatchMessageInspector { public object AfterReceiveRequest(ref Message request, IClientChannel channel, InstanceContext instanceContext) { // Grab the header and see if one of the particular values(read from config) is there. } public void BeforeSendReply(ref Message reply, object correlationState) { } }

    Read the article

  • How to model a relationship that NHibernate (or Hibernate) doesn’t easily support

    - by MylesRip
    I have a situation in which the ideal relationship, I believe, would involve Value Object Inheritance. This is unfortunately not supported in NHibernate so any solution I come up with will be less than perfect. Let’s say that: “Item” entities have a “Location” that can be in one of multiple different formats. These formats are completely different with no overlapping fields. We will deal with each Location in the format that is provided in the data with no attempt to convert from one format to another. Each Item has exactly one Location. “SpecialItem” is a subtype of Item, however, that is unique in that it has exactly two Locations. “Group” entities aggregate Items. “LocationGroup” is as subtype of Group. LocationGroup also has a single Location that can be in any of the formats as described above. Although I’m interested in Items by Group, I’m also interested in being able to find all items with the same Location, regardless of which group they are in. I apologize for the number of stipulations listed above, but I’m afraid that simplifying it any further wouldn’t really reflect the difficulties of the situation. Here is how the above could be diagrammed: Mapping Dilemma Diagram: (http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/592ad48b1a.jpg) (I tried placing the diagram inline, but Stack Overflow won't allow that until I have accumulated more points. I understand the reasoning behind it, but it is a bit inconvenient for now.) Hmmm... Apparently I can't have multiple links either. :-( Analyzing the above, I make the following observations: I treat Locations polymorphically, referring to the supertype rather than the subtype. Logically, Locations should be “Value Objects” rather than entities since it is meaningless to differentiate between two Location objects that have all the same values. Thus equality between Locations should be based on field comparisons, not identifiers. Also, value objects should be immutable and shared references should not be allowed. Using NHibernate (or Hibernate) one would typically map value objects using the “component” keyword which would cause the fields of the class to be mapped directly into the database table that represents the containing class. Put another way, there would not be a separate “Locations” table in the database (and Locations would therefore have no identifiers). NHibernate (or Hibernate) do not currently support inheritance for value objects. My choices as I see them are: Ignore the fact that Locations should be value objects and map them as entities. This would take care of the inheritance mapping issues since NHibernate supports entity inheritance. The downside is that I then have to deal with aliasing issues. (Meaning that if multiple objects share a reference to the same Location, then changing values for one object’s Location would cause the location to change for other objects that share the reference the same Location record.) I want to avoid this if possible. Another downside is that entities are typically compared by their IDs. This would mean that two Location objects would be considered not equal even if the values of all their fields are the same. This would be invalid and unacceptable from the business perspective. Flatten Locations into a single class so that there are no longer inheritance relationships for Locations. This would allow Locations to be treated as value objects which could easily be handled by using “component” mapping in NHibernate. The downside in this case would be that the domain model becomes weaker, more fragile and less maintainable. Do some “creative” mapping in the hbm files in order to force Location fields to be mapped into the containing entities’ tables without using the “component” keyword. This approach is described by Colin Jack here. My situation is more complicated than the one he describes due to the fact that SpecialItem has a second Location and the fact that a different entity, LocatedGroup, also has Locations. I could probably get it to work, but the mappings would be non-intuitive and therefore hard to understand and maintain by other developers in the future. Also, I suspect that these tricky mappings would likely not be possible using Fluent NHibernate so I would use the advantages of using that tool, at least in that situation. Surely others out there have run into similar situations. I’m hoping someone who has “been there, done that” can share some wisdom. :-) So here’s the question… Which approach should be preferred in this situation? Why?

    Read the article

  • Why Timer does not work if we do not generate a window?

    - by Roman
    Here is the code: import java.awt.event.ActionEvent; import java.awt.event.ActionListener; import javax.swing.JFrame; import javax.swing.Timer; public class TimerSample { public static void main(String args[]) { new JFrame().setVisible(true); ActionListener actionListener = new ActionListener() { public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent actionEvent) { System.out.println("Hello World Timer"); } }; Timer timer = new Timer(500, actionListener); timer.start(); } } It generates a window and then periodically prints "Hello World Timer" in the terminal (Command Prompt). If I comment this line new JFrame().setVisible(true); the application do not print anything to the command line. Why?

    Read the article

  • How to inherit methods from a parent class in C++

    - by Pat
    When inheriting classes in C++ I understand members are inherited. But how does one inherit the methods as well? For example, in the below code, I'd like the method "getValues" to be accessible not through just CPoly, but also by any class that inherits it. So one can call "getValues" on CRect directly. class CPoly { private: int width, height; public: void getValues (int* a, int* b) { *a=width; *b=height;} }; class CRect: public CPoly { public: int area () { return (width * height); } }; In other words, is there any way to inherit methods for simple generic methods like getters and setters?

    Read the article

  • Min-Ordered Bionomial Heap Insertion java

    - by Charodd Richardson
    Im writing a java code to make a min-ordered Binomial Heap and I have to Insert and Remove-min. I'm having a very big problem inserting into the Heap. I have been stuck on this for a couple of days now and it is due tomorrow. Whenever I go to insert, It only prints out the item I insert instead of the whole tree (which is in preorder). Such as if I insert 1 it prints (1) and then I go to insert 2 it prints out (2) instead of (1(2)) It keeps printing out only the number I insert last instead of the whole preordered tree. I would be very grateful if someone could help me with this problem. Thank you so much in advance, Here is my code. public class BHeap { int key; int degree;//The degree(Number of children) BHeap parent, leftmostChild, rightmostChild, rightSibling,root,previous,next; public BHeap(){ key =0; degree=0; parent =null; leftmostChild=null; rightmostChild=null; rightSibling=null; root=null; previous=null; next=null; } public BHeap merge(BHeap x, BHeap y){ BHeap newHeap = new BHeap(); y.rightSibling=x.root; BHeap currentHeap = y; BHeap nextHeap = y.rightSibling; while(currentHeap.rightSibling !=null){ if(currentHeap.degree==nextHeap.degree){ if(currentHeap.key<nextHeap.key){ if(currentHeap.degree ==0){ currentHeap.leftmostChild=nextHeap; currentHeap.rightmostChild=nextHeap; currentHeap.rightSibling=nextHeap.rightSibling; nextHeap.rightSibling=null; nextHeap.parent=currentHeap; currentHeap.degree++; } else{ newHeap = currentHeap; newHeap.rightmostChild.rightSibling=nextHeap; newHeap.rightmostChild=nextHeap; nextHeap.parent=newHeap; newHeap.degree++; nextHeap.rightSibling=null; nextHeap=newHeap.rightSibling; } } else{ if(currentHeap.degree==0){ nextHeap.rightmostChild=currentHeap; nextHeap.rightmostChild.root = nextHeap.rightmostChild;//add nextHeap.leftmostChild=currentHeap; nextHeap.leftmostChild.root = nextHeap.leftmostChild;//add currentHeap.parent=nextHeap; currentHeap.rightSibling=null; currentHeap.root=currentHeap;//add nextHeap.degree++; } else{ newHeap=nextHeap; newHeap.rightmostChild.rightSibling=currentHeap; newHeap.rightmostChild=currentHeap; currentHeap.parent= newHeap; newHeap.degree++; currentHeap=newHeap.rightSibling; currentHeap.rightSibling=null; } } } else{ currentHeap=currentHeap.rightSibling; nextHeap=nextHeap.rightSibling; } } return y; } public void Insert(int x){ /*BHeap newHeap = new BHeap(); newHeap.key=x; if(this.root==null){ this.root=newHeap; return; } else{ this.root=merge(newHeap,this.root); }*/ BHeap newHeap= new BHeap(); newHeap.key=x; if(this.root==null){ this.root=newHeap; } else{ this.root = merge(this,newHeap); }} public void RemoveMin(){ BHeap newHeap = new BHeap(); BHeap child = new BHeap(); newHeap=this; BHeap pos = newHeap.next; while(pos !=null){ if(pos.key<newHeap.key){ newHeap=pos; } pos=pos.rightSibling; } pos=this; BHeap B1 = new BHeap(); if(newHeap.previous!=null){ newHeap.previous.rightSibling=newHeap.rightSibling; B1 =pos.leftmostChild; B1.rightSibling=pos; pos.leftmostChild=pos.rightmostChild.leftmostChild; } else{ newHeap=newHeap.rightSibling; newHeap.previous.rightSibling=newHeap.rightSibling; B1 =pos.leftmostChild; B1.rightSibling=pos; pos.leftmostChild=pos.rightmostChild.leftmostChild; } merge(newHeap,B1); } public void Display(){ System.out.print("("); System.out.print(this.root.key); if(this.leftmostChild != null){ this.leftmostChild.Display(); } System.out.print(")"); if(this.rightSibling!=null){ this.rightSibling.Display(); } } }

    Read the article

  • XAML Binding to property

    - by imslavko
    I have check box in my XAML+C# Windows Store application. Also I have bool property: WindowsStoreTestApp.SessionData.RememberUser which is public and static. I want check box's property IsChecked to be consistent (or binded, or mapped) to this bool property. I tried this: XAML <CheckBox x:Name="chbRemember1" IsChecked="{Binding Mode=TwoWay}"/> C# chbRemember1.DataContext = SessionData.RememberUser; Code for property: namespace WindowsStoreTestApp { public class SessionData { public static bool RememberUser { get; set; } } } But it doesn't seem to work. Can you help me?

    Read the article

  • Upload Image to Facebook Objective-C

    - by boopyman
    I'm currently trying to upload an image from my Mac application to Facebook. To do this, I'd like for the user to simply input his username and password, and to click a button. The only issue is, Facebook doesn't actually have an API for the Mac, it only has one for iOS. This shouldn't be a problem, except for the fact that to login, you must use a web view, something I'm not to keen on doing, since I'd like the interface to be two simple text fields. I've also looked into PHFacebook, a class I found online, but it also seems to utilize an NSWebView. I'm wondering if there's a security issue when you use text fields; indeed, it's slightly strange no available API offers this function ! So, to conclude, is it possible, or is there an API, that lets you upload an image and lets you provide the user's credentials through simple NSStrings?

    Read the article

  • Question on Virtual Methods

    - by bobber205
    IF both methods are declared as virtual, shouldn't both instances of Method1() that are called be the derived class's Method1()? I am seeing BASE then DERIVED called each time. I am doing some review for an interview and I want to make sure I have this straight. xD class BaseClass { public: virtual void Method1() { cout << "Method 1 BASE" << endl; } }; class DerClass: public BaseClass { public: virtual void Method1() { cout << "Method 1 DERVIED" << endl; } }; DerClass myClass; ((BaseClass)myClass).Method1(); myClass.Method1(); Method 1 BASE Method 1 DERVIED

    Read the article

  • .Net using Chr() to parse text

    - by Marcx
    I'm building a simple client-server chat system. The clients send data to the server and the server resends the data to all the other clients. I'm using the TcpListener and Network stream classes to send the data between the client and the server. The fields I need to send are, for example: name, text, timestamp, etc. I separate them using the ASCII character 29. I'm also using ASCII character 30 to mark the end of the streamed data. The data is encoded with UTF8.. Is this a good approach? Will I run into problems? Are there better methods? UPDATE: Probably my question was misunderstood, so I explain it better.. Suppose to have a list of data to send from client to server, and suppose to send all the data in only one stream, how do you send these data? Using a markup Using a character as a delimiter Using a fixed length for every fields

    Read the article

  • How to generalize view?

    - by MexicanHacker
    Hey guys, I'm in the process of designing a set of views that use the same model in my app, the difference is that some views will differ in Read Only and Modifiable fields. So for example for view A I want to be able to modify A.One but no A.Two properties and for view B I want to have B.One and B.Two as modifiable fields. I was thinking in having a map that will hold this information and iterate both the modifiable and non-modifiable lists in a generic view, but I was thinking that maybe I can get feedback from you guys. What do you think?

    Read the article

  • Writing different structs to a file in C++? [on hold]

    - by user58053
    I need a way to write structures of three different kinds to a binary file, which later has to be searched. (As in, for example, struct A has two fields, an int and a char; struct B has int and a long; I need to output all structures whose int equals the one given from keyboard). I understand how to write structs of the same kind to a file and how to search them, but here I am just lost, best thing I came up with is declaring a struct containing all possibly needed fields and leaving the ones I don't need empty, but it really feels wrong, there HAS to be a better way to do that. I've read about binary files and could not find anything relevant, most examples and tutorials deal with writing one data type. Could anyone point me in the right direction? EDIT: I am looking for what @Jerry_coffin called database mode, and will probably use one of the existing database systems for that, best way to go, probably. Thank you everybody for the suggestions

    Read the article

  • Putting logic in ViewModel get'ers

    - by Yngvebn
    What do you think about putting Get-logic in the getters of a ViewModel? Something like: public class DummyViewModel { public int Id { get; set; } private DummyObject myObject; public DummyObject MyObject { get { if (MyObject == null) { DummyRepository repo = new DummyRepository(); myObject = repo.Get(Id); } return myObject; } } } Is this bad practice, or totally fine? I find my controllers getting really bloated by doing all the get-logic there, but I'm really torn as to where I should put it... My reason for doing it this way, is that I can pass the ViewModel to different types of view, and only the neccessary DB-lookup will be performed based on what property is requested.

    Read the article

  • NServiceBus sending data question

    - by Alidaswe
    hi, i am using NServices to send an object of the class MyMusicMessage as blow: [Serializable] public class MyMusicMessage:IMessage { public Guid EventId { set; get; } public byte[] MusicBytes { set; get; } } when the size of MusicBytes is about 200k, it can be sent well. but when the size is more than 300K,there is a "MessageQueueException". is there any limit to the object size in NServiceBus? thanks.

    Read the article

  • How do I link (dependency) properties in my ViewModel?

    - by mos
    Simplified example: I have an object that models a user. Users have a first name and a last name. The UserViewModel has a dependency property for my Models.User object. In the declaration of the UserView's xaml, I want to bind a couple of TextBlocks to the first and last name properties. What is the correct way to do this? Should I have readonly DependencyProperties for the name fields, and when the dependency property User is set, update them? Can the name fields be regular C# properties instead? Or, should I bind like this: <TextBlock Text="{Binding User.FirstName}" />

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442  | Next Page >