Search Results

Search found 54281 results on 2172 pages for 'function call'.

Page 447/2172 | < Previous Page | 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454  | Next Page >

  • Javascript this points to Window object

    - by terrani
    Hi, I have the following code. I expected to see "archive" object on my firebug console, but I see Window object. Is it normal? var archive = function(){} archive.prototype.action = { test: function(callback){ callback(); }, test2: function(){ console.log(this); } } var oArchive = new archive(); oArchive.action.test(oArchive.action.test2);

    Read the article

  • Window manipulation and inctences control

    - by touki
    In my application there are only 2 windows — win_a & win_b, on each of these windows there is button that call another window, e.g. click on btn1 of win_a will call win_b, click on btn2 of win_b will show win_a. Desired behaviour: 1. Only one instance of object is premitted at the same time, e.g. situation, where 2 instances of win_a running at the same time is not permitted. When you click on button that calls windows that already exist this action will only change a focus to needed window. If you call a window that previously had been created, but after this has been closed this action will create a new instance of this window. E.g. there are 2 running windows. you close one of them and after try to call this window back, so related button will create it. How to write it in WPF (XAML + C#). For the moment I wrote a version that can create a lot of instances of the same window (no number of instances control implemented), but I want to see only one instance of the same window, as we can see it in a lot of applications. Example of my code: Window win = new Window(); win.Show(); Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Socket.io Duplicate clients on a namespace

    - by Servernumber
    Hi I'm trying to use dynamic namespace to create them on demand. It's working except that I get duplicate or more client for some reason Server side : io.of("/" + group ).on("connection", function(socket_group) { socket_group.groupId = group; socket_group.on("infos", function(){ console.log("on the group !"); }) socket_group.on('list', function () { Urls.find({'group' : '...'}).sort({ '_id' : -1 }).limit(10).exec(function(err, data){ socket_group.emit('links', data); }); }) [...] }) Client Side : socket.emit('list', { ... }); On the client side only one command is sent but the server is always responding with 2 or more responses. Every time I close/open my app the response is incremented. Thanks if you find out.

    Read the article

  • Access property of a class from within a class instantiated in the original class.

    - by Iain
    I'm not certain how to explain this with the correct terms so maybe an example is the best method... $master = new MasterClass(); $master-doStuff(); class MasterClass { var $a; var $b; var $c; var $eventProccer; function MasterClass() { $this->a = 1; $this->eventProccer = new EventProcess(); } function printCurrent() { echo '<br>'.$this->a.'<br>'; } function doStuff() { $this->printCurrent(); $this->eventProccer->DoSomething(); $this->printCurrent(); } } class EventProcess { function EventProcess() {} function DoSomething() { // trying to access and change the parent class' a,b,c properties } } My problem is i'm not certain how to access the properties of the MasterClass from within the EventProcess-DoSomething() method? I would need to access, perform operations on and update the properties. The a,b,c properties will be quite large arrays and the DoSomething() method would be called many times during the execuction of the script. Any help or pointers would be much appreciated :)

    Read the article

  • How can I have a single helper work on different models passed to it?

    - by Angela
    I am probably going to need to refactor in two steps since I'm still developing the project and learning the use-cases as I go along since it is to scratch my own itch. I have three models: Letters, Calls, Emails. They have some similarilty, but I anticipate they also will have some different attributes as you can tell from their description. Ideally I could refactor them as Events, with a type as Letters, Calls, Emails, but didn't know how to extend subclasses. My immediate need is this: I have a helper which checks on the status of whether an email (for example) was sent to a specific contact: def show_email_status(contact, email) @contact_email = ContactEmail.find(:first, :conditions => {:contact_id => contact.id, :email_id => email.id }) if ! @contact_email.nil? return @contact_email.status end end I realized that I, of course, want to know the status for whether a call was made to a contact as well, so I wrote: def show_call_status(contact, call) @contact_call = ContactCall.find(:first, :conditions => {:contact_id => contact.id, :call_id => call.id }) if ! @contact_call.nil? return @contact_call.status end end I would love to be able to just have a single helper show_status where I can say show_status(contact,call) or show_status(contact,email) and it would know whether to look for the object @contact_call or @contact_email. Yes, it would be easier if it were just @contact_event, but I want to do a small refactoring while I get the program up and running, and this would make the ability to do a history for a given contact much easier. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • VS JavaScript intellisense with paramaters

    - by TonyB
    here is some sample javascript: SomeObjectType = function() { } SomeObjectType.prototype = { field1: null, field2: null } SomeOtherObject = function() { } SomeOtherObject.prototype = { doSomething: function(val) { /// <param name="val" type="SomeObjectType"></param> var val2 = new SomeObjectType(); //val2. shows intellisense correctly //val1. does NOT } } Shouldn't visual studio be giving me intellisence when i do "val." inside the "doSomething" function? I would expect it to give me field1 and field2 as options, but it doesn't. I DO get field1 and field2 if I type "val2." so intellisence works when I create a new object of the same type that I specify in the param comment. Any ideas what I am doing wrong or is this just not supported?

    Read the article

  • javascript : make a new safe class constructor

    - by guilin ??
    sometimes we loss the new keyword when define new object, obj = new Clazz(); //correct obj = Clazz(); //wrong, but no syntax error, hard to debug. I want to write a function to help me create Class and make it new safe. var Class = function(constructor){ //when constructor // if not call by new return new constructor(); // else constructor(); } var MyClazz = Class(function(name){ this.name = name }, SuperClazz1, SuperClass2 ) MyClazz.extend({ show: function(){console.log(this.name)} }) obj1 = new MyClazz(); obj2 = MyClazz(); // obj1 should same as obj2 Is it possible, any exists module?

    Read the article

  • Is possible use 'div id' as name of array?

    - by rflfn
    Please view this jsfiddle jsfiddle.net/rflfn/uS4jd/ This is other try jsfiddle.net/rflfn/T3ZT6/ I'm using SMOF to developper Wordpress theme, I need make one function to change some values when link is clicked, but when I make array with name of div, the array returns null value... <a class="button" id="settext1">Some Link</a> <br /> <a class="button" id="settext2">Another Link</a> <br /> <a class="button" id="settext3">Link 3</a> <br /> JQ: $(document).ready(function(){ // var col_settext1 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked col_settext1['field_id1']='#FF0000'; col_settext1['field_id2']='#00FFFF'; // var txt_settext1 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked txt_settext1['field_id3']='Some Text Here'; txt_settext1['field_id4']='Another Text Here'; // var txt_settext2 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked txt_settext2['field_id5']='Some Text Here'; // var col_settext2 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked col_settext2['field_id6']='Another Text Here'; // var chk_settext2 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked chk_settext2['field_id7']="checked"; }); $('.button').click(function(){ $myclass = this.id; $col = 'col_' + $myclass; $txt = 'txt_' + $myclass; $chk = 'chk_' + $myclass; // Based I clicked on the link 'settext1', Here I have this: // col_settext1 // txt_settext1 // chk_settext1 // THE PROBLEM ARE HERE! $col = new Array(); // <--- Here I use name of DIV as Array, but the value is lost... $txt = new Array(); $chk = new Array(); // Test... alert($col); // <--- Here no have any value :( alert($col[1]); // <--- Here no have any value :( for (id in $col) { // 'id' is value of array --> col_settext1['field_id1']='#FF0000'; // do function based on array values... // just example: alert(id); } for (id in $txt) { // 'id' is value of array --> txt_settext1['field_id1']='#FF0000'; // do function based on array values... } for (id in $chk) { // 'id' is value of array --> chk_settext1['field_id1']='#FF0000'; // do function based on array values... } }); Is possible use name of the div as array name? Any suggestion or any other method to solve this problem is welcome.

    Read the article

  • javascript popup window with correct data

    - by Christian
    I want this code below open in a popup window. How do I do? html- <td align="right"><a onclick="confirmSubmit();" target="paywin" class="button"><span><?php echo $button_continue; ?></span></a></td> Java - var newwin = null; function confirmSubmit() { $.ajax({ type: 'GET', url: 'index.php?route=payment/dibs/confirm', success: function() { $('#checkout-form').submit(); } }); } //--></script> I tried something like this: var newwin = null; function confirmSubmit() { $.ajax({ type: 'GET', url: 'index.php?route=payment/dibs/confirm', success: window.onload = function() { $('#checkout-form').submit(); } }); window.open('http://www.melacs.com/index.php?route=payment/dibs/confirm') } //--></script>

    Read the article

  • Difference between jQuery click, bind, live, delegate & trigger functions( with example)

    - by I Like PHP
    Hello All, I know there are a lot of questions similar to this, but I want to know clear difference between all of these jQuery functions together on this page with an example, so that it will be very helpful for me to understand the mechanism of all of these functions. I have also read the reference on jQuery main site, but there is no comparison between these: $().click(fn) $().bind('click',fn) $().live('click',fn) $().delegate('td','click',fn) $().trigger('click') // UPDATED Please do not refer any link if there is a part of question belong to that. Please describe how all four function exactly works in different manner, and which should be preferred in which situation. Note: If there are any other function with same functionality/mechanism , then please share. Thanks a lot. Update i have also seen $(trigger) function? is this works similar to above four function ?

    Read the article

  • Change Modul popup every 30 sec Javascript

    - by SoftwareDeveloper
    I have a div id called modalpage and have css. I need a javascript function which can dynamically shows popup for 20 mins and change in every 30 secs right now i have the following javascript function. Can anybody help me please <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> function revealModal(divID) { window.onscroll = function () { document.getElementById(divID).style.top = document.body.scrollTop; }; document.getElementById(divID).style.display = "block"; document.getElementById(divID).style.top = document.body.scrollTop; } which is called by a input id button. <input id="Button1" type="button" value="Click here" onclick="revealModal('modalPage')" /> Thanks

    Read the article

  • Is it possible for an abstract class to force it's children to have a constructor in PHP?

    - by Logan Serman
    I would like to do something like this: abstract class Foo { public function __construct() { echo 'This is the parent constructor'; } abstract function __construct(); } class Bar extends Foo { // constructor is required as this class extends Foo public function __construct() { //call parent::__construct() if necessary echo 'This is the child constructor'; } } But I get a fatal error when doing this: Fatal error: Cannot redeclare Foo::__construct() in Foo.php on line 8 Is there another way to ensure child classes have a constructor?

    Read the article

  • ActionScript Custom Class With Return Type?

    - by TheDarkIn1978
    i just know this is a dumb question, so excuse me in advance. i want to essentially classify a simple function in it's own .as file. the function compares integers. but i don't know how to call the class and receive a boolean return. here's my class package { public class CompareInts { public function CompareInts(small:int, big:int) { compare(small, big); } private function compare(small:int, big:int):Boolean { if (small < big) return true; else return false; } } } so now i'd like to write something like this: if (CompareInts(1, 5) == true). or output 'true' by writing trace(CompareInts(1, 5));

    Read the article

  • Accessing "pseudo-globals" by their name as a string

    - by rob
    I am now in the process of removing most globals from my code by enclosing everything in a function, turning the globals into "pseudo globals," that are all accessible from anywhere inside that function block. (function(){ var g = 1; var func f1 = function () { alert (g); } var func f2= function () { f1(); } })(); (technically this is only for my "release version", where I append all my files together into a single file and surround them with the above....my dev version still has typically one global per js file) This all works great except for one thing...there is one important place where I need to access some of these "globals" by string name. Previously, I could have done this: var name = "g"; alert (window[name]); and it did the same as alert(g); Now -- from inside the block -- I would like to do the same, on my pseudo-globals. But I can't, since they are no longer members of any parent object ("window"), even though are in scope. Any way to access them by string? Thanks...

    Read the article

  • "Implicit declaration" warning

    - by gcc
    For this code: int i=0; char **mainp; for(i=0;i<2;++i) { mainp[i]=malloc(sizeof(char)*200); if(!scanf("%[^#],#",mainp[i])) break; if(i<2) scanf("%[^#],#",mainp[i]); } GCC emits the warnings: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘scanf’ warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘scanf’ warning: ‘mainp’ may be used uninitialized in this function And I get a segmentation fault at runtime

    Read the article

  • Ajax to read from form

    - by Edwin
    Hello, I'm writing a store system for my game, it worked quite well until I found out that it only takes the amount of first entered Item. function pbuy(buyitem) { var amountc = "amount-"+buyitem, var amount = $("#"+amountc+"").val(); $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "store2.php", data: "buyitem="+ buyitem+"&amount="+amount, success: function(resp){ document.getElementById('ajaxDiv').innerHTML = resp; }, error: function(e){ alert('Error: ' + e); } }); } I'm trying to give it it the Id of the form like so: function pbuy(buyitem) { var amountc = "amount-"+buyitem, var amount = $("#"+amountc+"").val(); But nothing happens. The code the creation of the forms is: <tr> <td class='items' width='80%' align='center' valign='top'><?PHP echo $itemstore->itemname;?> </td> <td width="20%"> Price:<?PHP echo $itemstore->newprice;?> <form method="post"> <input type='text' id='amount-<?PHP echo $row;?>)' /> <input name="itembid" type="button" onclick="pbuy(<?PHP echo $row;?>)" value="Buy" /></form></td> </tr> If I hardcode the amount in the ajax function it all runs fine like it should.

    Read the article

  • A self-creator: What pattern is this? php

    - by user151841
    I have several classes that are basically interfaces to database rows. Since the class assumes that a row already exists ( __construct expects a field value ), there is a public static function that allows creation of the row and returns an instance of the class. Here's a pseudo-code example : class fruit { public $id; public function __construct( $id ) { $this->id = $id; $sql = "SELECT * FROM Fruits WHERE id = $id"; ... $this->arrFieldValues[$field] = $row[$value]; } public function __get( $var ) { return $this->arrFieldValues[$var]; } public function __set( $var, $val ) { $sql = "UPDATE fruits SET $var = $val WHERE id = $this->id"; } public static function create( $id ) { $sql = "INSERT INTO Fruits ( fruit_name ) VALUE ( '$fruit' )"; $id = mysql_insert_id(); $fruit = & new fruit($id); return $fruit; } } $obj1 = fruit::create( "apple" ); $obj2 = & new fruit( 12 ); What is this pattern called? Edit: I changed the example to one that has more database-interface functionality. For most of the time, this kind of class would be instantiated normally, through __construct(). But sometimes when you need to create a new row first, you would call create().

    Read the article

  • jquery - appended element not draggable

    - by kikkoman90
    Hello, So i have one div element that i append on my DOM with a click of a link. The problem is that i should be able to move that element around, but if i append it to my DOM i can't drag it at all. So is the live()-function solution? If it is, how should i use it? I kinda don't know how. Here's the minimalistic code: element to be appended (data.html): <div id="menu"> <p>random stuff here</p> </div> jquery: $("#menu").draggable(); $("#button").click(function(){ //custom function for exists() if ($("#menu").exists()){ $("#menu").remove(); } else { $.get("data.html", function(data){ $("body").append(data); }); } });

    Read the article

  • implicit declaration of

    - by gcc
    int i=0; char **mainp; for(i=0;i<2;++i) { mainp[i]=malloc(sizeof(char)*200); if(!scanf("%[^#],#",mainp[i])) break; if(i<2) scanf("%[^#],#",mainp[i]); } why does gcc send me that warnings warning: implicit declaration of function ‘scanf’ warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘scanf’ warning: ‘mainp’ may be used uninitialized in this function

    Read the article

  • JQuery - Widget Public Methods

    - by Steve
    If I create a JQuery widget (code example below), and then define a "public" method, is there any other way to call the method other than using the following form? $("#list").list("publicMethod"); I would like to create a series of widgets that all define the same methods (basically implementing the same interface), and be able to call the method without knowing anything about which widget I currently am invoking the method on. In the current form, I need to know that I am executing the method on the "list" widget. Below is an example of creating a widget with the "public" method. (function($) { var items = []; var itemFocusIdx = 0; $.widget("ui.list", { // Standard stuff options : { ... }, _create : function() { ... }, destroy : function() { ... }, // My Public Methods publicMethod : function() { ... } ... }); }(jQuery));

    Read the article

  • How to implement callback functions inside classes (PHP)

    - by sombe
    I need to use a class callback method on an array inside another method (the callback function belongs to the class). class Database { public function escape_string_for_db($string){ return mysql_real_escape_string($string); } public function escape_all_array($array){ return array_filter($array,"$this->escape_string_for_db"); } } Is this the right way to go about that? (I mean, in terms of the second parameter passed to array_filter)

    Read the article

  • jquery looping include php

    - by mapet
    Jquery Code: $(function() { $("#submit").click(function(){ var pilaMan = 2; for (i=0; i < pilaMan; i++) { $('#dialog_link').dialog({ modal: false, autoOpen: false, width: 800, height: 300, buttons: { "Ok": function() { $(this).dialog("close"); }, "Cancel": function() { $(this).dialog("close"); } } }); $('#dialog' + i).click(function(){ $('#dialog_link' ).dialog('open'); var lineCode = $('#lineCode').currentElem.prev().val(); alert(lineCode); return false; }); } }); My Problem with my jquery Code i cant get the exact value of $amew.. and also when i alert the lineCode it will return undefined :( php code: $amew = "loso, nimo"; $count = 0; $array = explode(" ", $amew) foreach ($array as $value) { echo '<td width="68" class="rep" id="dialog'.$count.'">'; echo '<input type="text" id="lineCode'" value="'.$value.'">'; echo '</td'; } my problem with my php code is so redundant my jquery codes i solving this for 10 hours and still i cant get it need help guys:(

    Read the article

  • Python - How can I make this code asynchronous?

    - by dave
    Here's some code that illustrates my problem: def blocking1(): while True: yield 'first blocking function example' def blocking2(): while True: yield 'second blocking function example' for i in blocking1(): print 'this will be shown' for i in blocking2(): print 'this will not be shown' I have two functions which contain while True loops. These will yield data which I will then log somewhere (most likely, to an sqlite database). I've been playing around with threading and have gotten it working. However, I don't really like it... What I would like to do is make my blocking functions asynchronous. Something like: def blocking1(callback): while True: callback('first blocking function example') def blocking2(callback): while True: callback('second blocking function example') def log(data): print data blocking1(log) blocking2(log) How can I achieve this in Python? I've seen the standard library comes with asyncore and the big name in this game is Twisted but both of these seem to be used for socket IO. How can I async my non-socket related, blocking functions?

    Read the article

  • How to avoid circular reference when excel cell update

    - by Nimo
    Hi, I'm writing a set of functions in c++ which can be called by excel. However, these functions are asynchronous, therefore no immediate return values available. Once a result is available I used a callback function through VBA which update the result to the relevant cell which called the functions. But, here I'm having circular function calling problem, because when I update the cell. excel automatically call the original function once again. Please help me to get around this problem Thank You

    Read the article

  • What are the differences in performance between synchronous and asynchronous JavaScript script loading?

    - by jasdeepkhalsa
    My question is simply: what are the differences in performance between synchronous and asynchronous JavaScript script loading? From what I've gathered synchronous code blocks the loading of a page and/or rest of the code from executing. This happens at two levels. First, at the level of the script actually loading, and secondly, within the JavaScript code itself. For example, on the page: Synchronous: <script src="demo_async.js" type="text/javascript"></script> Asynchronous: <script async src="demo_async.js" type="text/javascript"></script> And within a script: Synchronous: function a() {alert("a"); function b() {alert("b");}} Asynchronous (and self-executing): (function(a, function(b){ alert(b); }) { alert(a); }))(); So what really is the difference in performance from using these different loading methods and JavaScript patterns?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454  | Next Page >