Search Results

Search found 98443 results on 3938 pages for 'sql server'.

Page 451/3938 | < Previous Page | 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458  | Next Page >

• How to avoid circular relationship in SQL-Server?

  - by Shimmy

  I am creating a self-related table: Table Item columns: ItemId int - PK; Amount money - not null; Price money - a computed column using a UDF that retrieves value according to the items ancestors' Amount. ParentItemId int - nullable, reference to another ItemId in this table. I need to avoid a loop, meaning, a sibling cannot become an ancestor of his ancestors, meaning, if ItemId=2 ParentItemId = 1, then ItemId 1 ParentItemId = 2 shouldn't be allowed. I don't know what should be the best practice in this situation. I think I should add a CK that gets a Scalar value from a UDF or whatever else. EDIT: Another option is to create an INSTEAD OF trigger and put in 1 transaction the update of the ParentItemId field and selecting the Price field from the @@RowIdentity, if it fails cancel transaction, but I would prefer a UDF validating. Any ideas are sincerely welcomed.

  Read the article

• SSRS 2008 - How to hide the plus icon in a group visibility toggle cell

  - by Daniel Coffman

  I have a report that shows or hides columns in a group based on a header cell. SSRS makes this pretty easy and is kind enough to place a little plus/minus icon in the toggling cell. I want to HIDE this plus/minus icon when there is only one column of data in the subgroup, because it shows that one column by default so expanding the group doesn't do anything. This really only applies to one specific group, because all the others always have more than one column of data, so a way to hide only the icon for a specific group would be fine. JavaScript won't work (I don't think) because the client ID of the plus/minus image is generated by the report and changes with each generation. see this image for more clarity: http://imgur.com/vqaQA.png

  Read the article

• Searching Week-wise/Month-wise record counts(number) and the StartDate+EndDate(datetime) of the Week

  - by Muzaffar Ali Rana

  I have a question in connection to this question earlier posted by me:- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2452984/daily-weekly-monthly-record-count-search-via-storedprocedure I want to have the Count of Calls on Weekly-basis and Monthly-basis, Daily-basis issue is resolved. ISSUE NUMBER @1:Weekly-basis Count of Calls and Start-Date and End-Date of Week I have searched the Start-Date and End-Date of Week including their individual Count of Calls as well in the below-mentioned query. But the problem is that I could not get the result in one single table, although I have used the Temporary Tables(#TempTable+#TempTable2). Kindly help me in this regards. NOTE:Table Creation commented as for executing more than once. ----- *** TABLE CREATION OF #TempTable & #TempTable2 *** ---------- --CREATE TABLE #TempTable( StartDate datetime,EndDate datetime,CallCount numeric(18,5)) --CREATE TABLE #TempTable2( StartDate datetime,EndDate datetime,CallCount numeric(18,5)) DECLARE @StartDate datetime,@EndDate datetime,@StartDateTemp1 datetime,@StartDateTemp2 datetime,@EndDateTemp datetime,@Period varchar(50); SET @StartDate='1/1/2010'; SET @EndDate='2/28/2010'; SET @StartDateTemp1=@StartDate; SET @StartDateTemp2=DATEADD(dd, 7, @StartDate ); SET @Period='Weekly'; IF (@Period = 'Weekly') BEGIN WHILE ((@StartDate <= @StartDateTemp1) AND (@StartDateTemp2 <= @EndDate)) BEGIN IF((@StartDateTemp1 < @StartDateTemp2 ) AND (@StartDateTemp1 != @StartDateTemp2) ) BEGIN SELECT convert(varchar, @StartDateTemp1, 106) AS 'Start Date', convert(varchar, @StartDateTemp2, 106) AS 'End Date', COUNT(*) AS 'Call Count' FROM TRN_Call WHERE (CallTime = @StartDateTemp1 AND CallTime <= @StartDateTemp2 ); END SET @StartDateTemp1 = DATEADD(dd, 7, @StartDateTemp1); SET @StartDateTemp2 = DATEADD(dd, 7, @StartDateTemp2); END END ISSUE NUMBER @2:Monthly-basis Count of Calls and Start-Date and End-Date of Week In this case, I have the same search, but will have to search the Call Counts plus the Start-Date and End-Date of the Month. Kindly help me in this regards as well.

  Read the article

• Multi-statement Table Valued Function vs Inline Table Valued Function

  - by AndyC

  ie: CREATE FUNCTION MyNS.GetUnshippedOrders() RETURNS TABLE AS RETURN SELECT a.SaleId, a.CustomerID, b.Qty FROM Sales.Sales a INNER JOIN Sales.SaleDetail b ON a.SaleId = b.SaleId INNER JOIN Production.Product c ON b.ProductID = c.ProductID WHERE a.ShipDate IS NULL GO versus: CREATE FUNCTION MyNS.GetLastShipped(@CustomerID INT) RETURNS @CustomerOrder TABLE (SaleOrderID INT NOT NULL, CustomerID INT NOT NULL, OrderDate DATETIME NOT NULL, OrderQty INT NOT NULL) AS BEGIN DECLARE @MaxDate DATETIME SELECT @MaxDate = MAX(OrderDate) FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader WHERE CustomerID = @CustomerID INSERT @CustomerOrder SELECT a.SalesOrderID, a.CustomerID, a.OrderDate, b.OrderQty FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader a INNER JOIN Sales.SalesOrderHeader b ON a.SalesOrderID = b.SalesOrderID INNER JOIN Production.Product c ON b.ProductID = c.ProductID WHERE a.OrderDate = @MaxDate AND a.CustomerID = @CustomerID RETURN END GO Is there an advantage to using one over the other? Is there certain scenarios when one is better than the other or are the differences purely syntactical? I realise the 2 example queries are doing different things but is there a reason I would write them in that way? Reading about them and the advantages/differences haven't really been explained. Thanks

  Read the article

• Problem with Mapping Linq-to-Sql on different Types

  - by csharpnoob

  Hi, maybe someone can help. I want to have on mapped Linq-Class different Datatype. This is working: private System.Nullable<short> _deleted = 1; [Column(Storage = "_deleted", Name = "deleted", DbType = "SmallInt", CanBeNull = true)] public System.Nullable<short> deleted { get { return this._deleted; } set { this._deleted = value; } } Sure thing. But no when i want to place some logic for boolean, like this: private System.Nullable<short> _deleted = 1; [Column(Storage = "_deleted", Name = "deleted", DbType = "SmallInt", CanBeNull = true)] public bool deleted { get { if (this._deleted == 1) { return true; } return false; } set { if(value == true) { this._deleted = (short)1; }else { this._deleted = (short)0; } } } I get always runtime error: [TypeLoadException: GenericArguments[2], "System.Nullable`1[System.Int16]", on 'System.Data.Linq.Mapping.PropertyAccessor+Accessor`3[T,V,V2]' violates the constraint of type parameter 'V2'.] I can't change the database to bit.. I need to have casting in mapping class.

  Read the article

• Interesting SQL Sorting Issue

  - by rofly

  It's crunch time, deadline for my most recent contract is coming in two days and almost everything is complete and working fine (knock on wood) except for one issue. In one of my stored procedures, I'm needing to return a result set as follows. group_id | name A101 | Craig A102 | Craig Z101 | Craig Z102 | Craig A101 | Jim A102 | Jim Z101 | Jim Z102 | Jim B101 | Andy B102 | Andy Z101 | Andy Z102 | Andy The names need to be sorted by the first character of the group id and also include the Z101/Z102 entries. By sorting strictly by the group id, I get a result set as follows: A101 | Craig A102 | Craig A101 | Jim A102 | Jim B101 | Andy B102 | Andy Z101 | Andy Z102 | Andy Z101 | Jim Z102 | Jim I really can't think of a solution that doesn't involve me making a cursor and bloating the stored procedure up more than it already is. I'm sure a great mind out there has an elegant solution and I'm eager to see what the community can come up with. Thanks a ton in advance.

  Read the article

• Help using left outer joins in SQL...

  - by Waffles

  I'm trying to create a list of people, their friends, and their friends of friends. My table of people is this: People: NAME Jow Smith Sandy Phil Friends LIKER LIKEE jow smith smith jow sandy phil Now, what I want is a table like this: User Friend FriendofFriend Jow smith jow Smith jow smith sandy phil phil I'm trying to create a table using the following: SELECT P.NAME, F.LIKEE, F2.LIKEE FROM PEOPLE P LEFT OUTER JOIN FRIENDS F ON P.NAME = F.LIKER LEFT OUTER JOIN FRIENDS F2 ON F.LIKEE = F2.LIKER But the above isn't working. How can I get a table of people and their friends, regardless of whether or not they actually HAVE any friends?

  Read the article

• [Linq to SQL] Multiple foreign keys to the same table

  - by cdonner

  I have a reference table with all sorts of controlled value lookup data for gender, address type, contact type, etc. Many tables have multiple foreign keys to this reference table I also have many-to-many association tables that have two foreign keys to the same table. Unfortunately, when these tables are pulled into a Linq model and the DBML is generated, SQLMetal does not look at the names of the foreign key columns, or the names of the constraints, but only at the target table. So I end up with members called Reference1, Reference2, ... not very maintenance-friendly. Example: <Association Name="tb_reference_tb_account" Member="tb_reference" <====== ThisKey="shipping_preference_type_id" OtherKey="id" Type="tb_reference" IsForeignKey="true" /> <Association Name="tb_reference_tb_account1" Member="tb_reference1" <====== ThisKey="status_type_id" OtherKey="id" Type="tb_reference" IsForeignKey="true" /> I can go into the DBML and manually change the member names, of course, but this would mean I can no longer round-trip my database schema. This is not an option at the current stage of the model, which is still evolving. Splitting the reference table into n individual tables is also not desirable. I can probably write a script that runs against the XML after each generation and replaces the member name with something derived from ThisKey (since I adhere to a naming convention for these types of keys). Has anybody found a better solution to this problem?

  Read the article

• How to Transform a user's search string into a MS SQL Full-Text Search Phrase

  - by Atomiton

  I've search for answers for this and I can't seem to find an answer to what should be somewhat simple. This is related to another question I asked, but it's different. What's the best way to take a user's search phrase and throw it into a CONTAINSTABLE(table, column, @phrase, topN ) phrase? Say, for example the user inputs: Books by "Dr. Seuss" What's the best way to turn that into something that will return results in my ContainsTAble() phrase? I was previously parsing the search phrase and writing something like ISABOUT("Books" WEIGHT(1.0), "by" WEIGHT(0.9), "Dr. Seuss" WEIGHT(0.8)) as my @phrase but ISABOUT seems to be returning odd results... especially when one word searches are entered. Any Ideas?

  Read the article

• What is syncobj in SQL Server

  - by hgulyan

  Hi. I run this script to search particular text in sys.columns and I get a lot of "dbo.syncobj_0x3934443438443332" this kind of result. SELECT c.name, s.name + '.' + o.name FROM sys.columns c INNER JOIN sys.objects o ON c.object_id=o.object_id INNER JOIN sys.schemas s ON o.schema_id=s.schema_id WHERE c.name LIKE '%text%' If I get it right, they are replication objects. Is it so? Can i just throw them away from my query just like o.name NOT LIKE '%syncobj%' or there's another way? Thank you.

  Read the article

• Taking a snapshot (cloning) of a project using Linq 2 Sql

  - by JoeBlogs1999

  I have a Project entity with several child tables, eg ProjectAwards ProjectTeamMember I would like to copy the data from Project (and child tables) into a new Project record and update the Project status. eg var projectEntity = getProjectEntity(projectId); draftProjectEntity = projectEntity draftProjectEntity.Status = NewStatus context.SubmitChanges(); I found this link from Marc Gravell Its part of the way there but it updates the child records to the new draftProject, where I need it to copy.

  Read the article

• constructing paramater query SQL - LIKE % in .cs and in grid view

  - by Indranil Mutsuddy

  Hello friends, I am trying to implement admin login and operators(india,australia,america) login, now operator id starts with 'IND123' 'AUS123' and 'AM123' when operator india logs in he can see the details of only members have id 'IND%', the same applies for an australian and american users and when admin logs in he can see details of members with id 'IND%' or 'AUS%' or 'AM%' i have a table which defines the role i.e admin or operator and their prefix(IND,AUS respectively) In loginpage i created a session for Role and prefix PREFIX = myReader["Prefix"].ToString(); Session["LoginRole"] = myReader["Role"].ToString(); Session["LoginPrefix"] = String.Concat(PREFIX + "%"); works fine In main page(after login) i have to count the number of member so i wrote string prefix = Session["LoginPrefix"].ToString(); string role = Session["LoginRole"].ToString(); if (role.Equals("ADMIN")) StrMemberId = "select count(*) from MemberList"; else StrMemberId = "select count(*) from MemberList where MemberID like '"+prefix+"'"; thatworks fine too Problem: 1. i want to constructor parameter something like StrMemberId = "select count(*) from MemberList where MemberID like '@prefix+'"; myCommd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@prefix", prefix); Which is not working 2 Displaying the members in gridview i need to give condition (something like if (role.Equals("ADMIN")) show all members else show member depending on the operator prefix)the list of members in operator mode and admin mode. - where to put the condition in gridview how to apply these please suggest something Regards Indranil

  Read the article

• Team Foundation Server Setup/Access

  - by Angel Brighteyes

  What I need: A TFS 2010 Setup that allows 2 application developers to access the TFS from remote locations. How it is setup: Server 2008 Standard 2g Ram 300g HD space SharePoint Server 2007, using SQL Server 2005 SQL Server 2008 Standard Team Foundation Server 2010 IIS 7 Sharepoint Bindings: TFS.DynAccount.Me:80; TFS:80 TFS Bindings: TFS.DynAccount.Me:8080; TFS:8080 Using DynDNS service to account for the dynamic ip address being used, this is a requirement for the moment until I can get a better isp package. Access using Local Accounts Server is not setup on a domain, or as a domain. Consequently I did not setup AD services. Problem: When logged into TFS using my credentials TFS\AdminUser through the DynDNS account TFS.DynAccount.Me I recieve the 'Red X of Death' on the Documents and Reports folder. When logged into the TFS through the local peer to peer network using the same credentials TFS\AdminUser I do not receive the 'Red X of Death' problem. Further Troubleshooting: When users 'Right Click' the 'TeamProject1' Click 'Show Project Portal' it tries to take them to http://TFS:8080 instead of http://TFS.DynAccount.Me:8080, which doing further research I am assuming that it is because team foundation server was setup with a local name of TFS instead of 'TFS.DynAccount.Me' as specified here in Visual Studio Magazines: The Red X of Death. Users can Access the Team Portal for SharePoint via http://TFS.DynAccount.Me/TeamCollection/TeamProject so it is not like we are dead in the water or anything. However, as most employees/staff are prone to do, they have expressed a great distaste for having to do it this way and just be patient until the current project is finished since we are under a very strict deadline. Is there a way to set this up differently, or change some settings someplace, reinstall it, point a CName record for our domain website to the DynAccount (e.g. TFS.OurDomain.com points to TFS.DynAccount.Me, which consequently does allow access to the http site without issues), or something. I really don't feel like after all the time and effort I have spent into, first the cost, second the bloody install, third learning SharePoint well enough, fourth the hours into days spent on this, fifth more troubleshooting, sixth employee headaches to just let it lay where it is at. I figure in my spare/off time I would keep trying to get this to work. So I really appreciate any help any one can give me. I know this is probably something really stupid simple that I will 'Face Palm' over, but at the moment the stress and frustration just has me beat. Thank you again, this community has always been a great help.

  Read the article

• Filter rows on the basis of "First Name" + "Last Name" in SQL

  - by Raghav Khunger

  Hi, I have a user table in my database which contains two columns FirstName and LastName. Now in my front end there is a textbox to filter out the users from this table. Let's suppose I am taking that input from the front end in the form of a input parameter "@SEARCHKEYWORD". I have created a sample below: DECLARE @Test TABLE ([ID] INT IDENTITY, [FNAME] NVARCHAR(100), [LNAME] NVARCHAR(100) ) INSERT INTO @Test( FNAME, LNAME ) SELECT 'John','Resig' UNION ALL SELECT 'Dave','Ward' UNION ALL SELECT 'Peter','Smith' UNION ALL SELECT 'Dave','Smith' UNION ALL SELECT 'Girija','Acharya' UNION ALL SELECT 'Devendra', 'Gujel' UNION ALL SELECT 'Arjit', 'Gupta' DECLARE @SEARCHKEYWORD NVARCHAR(100) SELECT * FROM @Test WHERE FNAME +' '+ LNAME LIKE @SEARCHKEYWORD i.e. so far I have thought of this query to filter out the rows but it is not giving the desired results: SELECT * FROM @Test WHERE FNAME +' '+ LNAME LIKE @SEARCHKEYWORD Here are the desired outputs which I needed for the inputs mentioned below: --WHEN @SEARCHKEYWORD='John Resig' --Desired OUTPUT: the row which contains 'John','Resig' --WHEN @SEARCHKEYWORD='Ac' --Desired OUTPUT: the row which contains 'Girija','Acharya' --WHEN @SEARCHKEYWORD='Smith' --Desired OUTPUT: the row which contains 'Peter','Smith' and 'Dave','Smith' --WHEN @SEARCHKEYWORD='g' --Desired OUTPUT: the row which contains 'Devendra', 'Gujel' and 'Arjit', 'Gupta' --WHEN @SEARCHKEYWORD='Smith' --Desired OUTPUT: the row which contains 'Peter','Smith' and 'Dave','Smith'

  Read the article

• Row concat from this query

  - by Álvaro G. Vicario

  I have this query: SELECT DISTINCT IM.EDIFICIOS_ID, TI.TITULAR FROM IMPORTACION IM INNER JOIN I_EDIFICIO IE ON IM.IMPORTACION_ID=IE.IMPORTACION_ID INNER JOIN I_EDIFICIO_TITULAR ET ON IM.IMPORTACION_ID=ET.IMPORTACION_ID AND IE.EDIFICIO_ID=ET.EDIFICIO_ID INNER JOIN I_TITULAR TI ON IM.IMPORTACION_ID=TI.IMPORTACION_ID AND ET.TITULAR_ID=TI.TITULAR_ID WHERE TI.TITULAR IS NOT NULL AND TI.TITULAR<>'' ORDER BY IM.EDIFICIOS_ID, TI.TITULAR; that returns this result set: EDIFICIOS_ID TITULAR ------------ ------------------ 1911 Ana María García 1911 Anselmo Piedrahita 1911 Manuel López 2594 Carlos Pérez 2594 Felisa García 6865 Carlos Pérez 6865 Felisa García 8428 Carlos Pérez I want to concatenate the values from TITULAR for each EDIFICIOS_ID, so I get this: EDIFICIOS_ID TITULAR ------------ ------------------ 1911 Ana María García; Anselmo Piedrahita; Manuel López 2594 Carlos Pérez; Felisa García 6865 Carlos Pérez; Felisa García 8428 Carlos Pérez I'm trying to use the FOR XML PATH trick. I've used it in the past but, since I can't really understand how it works, I can't figure out how to apply it to this specific case. Can you provide me with some ideas?

  Read the article

• Cannot create a row of size 8074 which is greater than the allowable maximum row size of 8060.

  - by Lieven Cardoen

  I have already asked a question about this, but the problems keeps on hitting me ;-) I have two tables that are identical. I want to add a xml column. In the first table this is no problem, but in the second table I get the sqlException (title). However, apart from the data in it, they are the same. So, can I get the sqlException because of data in the table? I have also tried to store the field off page with EXEC sp_tableoption 'dbo.PackageSessionNodesFinished', 'large value types out of row', 1 but without any succes. The same SqlException keeps coming. First table: PackageSessionNodes CREATE TABLE [dbo].[PackageSessionNodes]( [PackageSessionNodeId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [PackageSessionId] [int] NOT NULL, [TreeNodeId] [int] NOT NULL, [Duration] [int] NULL, [Score] [float] NOT NULL, [ScoreMax] [float] NOT NULL, [Interactions] [xml] NOT NULL, [BrainTeaser] [bit] NULL, [DateCreated] [datetime] NULL, [CompletionStatus] [int] NOT NULL, [ReducedScore] [float] NOT NULL, [ReducedScoreMax] [float] NOT NULL, [ContentInteractions] [xml] NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT [PK_PackageSessionNodes] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ( [PackageSessionNodeId] ASC )WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY] ) ON [PRIMARY] Second table: PackageSessionNodesFinished CREATE TABLE [dbo].[PackageSessionNodesFinished]( [PackageSessionNodeFinishedId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [PackageSessionId] [int] NOT NULL, [TreeNodeId] [int] NOT NULL, [Duration] [int] NULL, [Score] [float] NOT NULL, [ScoreMax] [float] NOT NULL, [Interactions] [xml] NOT NULL, [BrainTeaser] [bit] NULL, [DateCreated] [datetime] NULL, [CompletionStatus] [int] NOT NULL, [ReducedScore] [float] NOT NULL, [ReducedScoreMax] [float] NOT NULL, [ContentInteractions] [xml] NULL, CONSTRAINT [PK_PackageSessionNodesFinished] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ( [PackageSessionNodeFinishedId] ASC )WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY] ) ON [PRIMARY] First script I tried to run (First two ALTER TABLE work fine, the third crashes on SqlException) ALTER TABLE dbo.PackageSessionNodes ADD ContentInteractions xml NOT NULL CONSTRAINT DF_PackageSessionNodes_ContentInteractions DEFAULT (('<contentinteractions/>')); ALTER TABLE dbo.PackageSessionNodes DROP CONSTRAINT DF_PackageSessionNodes_ContentInteractions ALTER TABLE dbo.PackageSessionNodesFinished ADD ContentInteractions xml NOT NULL CONSTRAINT DF_PackageSessionNodesFinished_ContentInteractions DEFAULT (('<contentinteractions/>')); ALTER TABLE dbo.PackageSessionNodesFinished DROP CONSTRAINT DF_PackageSessionNodesFinished_ContentInteractions Second script I tried to run with the same result as previous script: EXEC sp_tableoption 'dbo.PackageSessionNodes', 'large value types out of row', 1 ALTER TABLE dbo.PackageSessionNodes ADD ContentInteractions xml NOT NULL CONSTRAINT DF_PackageSessionNodes_ContentInteractions DEFAULT (('<contentinteractions/>')); ALTER TABLE dbo.PackageSessionNodes DROP CONSTRAINT DF_PackageSessionNodes_ContentInteractions EXEC sp_tableoption 'dbo.PackageSessionNodesFinished', 'large value types out of row', 1 ALTER TABLE dbo.PackageSessionNodesFinished ADD ContentInteractions xml NOT NULL CONSTRAINT DF_PackageSessionNodesFinished_ContentInteractions DEFAULT (('<contentinteractions/>')); ALTER TABLE dbo.PackageSessionNodesFinished DROP CONSTRAINT DF_PackageSessionNodesFinished_ContentInteractions Now, In PackageSessionNodes there are 234 records, in PackageSessionNodesFinished there are 4256946 records. Really would appreciate some help here as I'm stuck.

  Read the article

• SQL Oracle LEFT JOIN and SUBQUERY error: ORA-00905: missing keyword

  - by Curro

  Hello everyone. Asking for your help on this Oracle query. It's giving me the error 2 "ORA-00905: missing keyword". It was working fine before I added the LEFT JOIN statement. Obviously it won't deliver the information as we need it without the LEFT JOIN statement. Please provide any help to know which keyword is missing in this query Thanks a lot!: DB Tables: DW.TICKETS DW.TICKET_ACTLOG Subquery table: TABLE_RESOLVERS SELECT TO_CHAR(DW.TICKETS.RESOLVED_TIMESTAMP,'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') AS RESOLVED_DATE, DW.TICKETS.SUBJECT, DW.TICKETS.OWNER_CORE_ID, DW.TICKETS.TICKET_NUMBER, TABLE_RESOLVERS.SUBMITTER AS RESOLVER_CORE_ID FROM DW.TICKETS LEFT JOIN (SELECT TICKET_NUMBER, SUBMITTER FROM DW.TICKET_ACTLOG WHERE TYPE = 'Final Resolution' AND (SUBMITTER = 'B02666' OR SUBMITTER = 'R66604') ORDER BY CREATE_TIMESTAMP DESC ) AS TABLE_RESOLVERS ON DW.TICKETS.TICKET_NUMBER = TABLE_RESOLVERS.TICKET_NUMBER WHERE DW.TICKETS.RESOLVED_TIMESTAMP >= to_date('05-03-2010','dd-mm-yyyy') AND DW.TICKETS.RESOLVED_TIMESTAMP < to_date('8-03-2010','dd-mm-yyyy') AND DW.TICKETS.TICKET_NUMBER LIKE 'TCK%' AND DW.TICKETS.TICKET_NUMBER IN (SELECT TICKET_NUMBER FROM DW.TICKET_ACTLOG WHERE (SUBMITTER = 'B02666' OR SUBMITTER = 'R66604') ) ORDER BY DW.TICKETS.CREATE_TIMESTAMP ASC

  Read the article

• SQL Stored Procedure: Business Hours

  - by Jacob

  How can I create a stored procedure that accepts a start and end date.(e.g April 1 - April 30 1.) Get the business days including Saturdays x (a value). Plus 2.) Get Holidays x (a value) and return the total. I'm new to this, I guess it would be a tsql function. hmm. any help would be appreciated. Thanks

  Read the article

• SQL Server database with clustered GUID PKs - switch clustered index or switch to sequential (comb)

  - by Eyvind

  We have a database in which all the PKs are GUIDs, and most of the PKs are also the clustered index for the table. We know that this is bad (due to the random nature of GUIDs). So, it seems there are basically two options here (short of throwing out GUIDs as PKs altogether, which we cannot do (at least not at this time)). We could change the GUID generation algorithm to e.g. the one that NHibernate uses, as detailed in this post, or we could, for the tables that are under the heaviest use, change to a different clustered index, e.g. an IDENTITY column, and keep the "random" GUIDs as PKs. Is it possible to give any general recommendations in such a scenario? The application in question has 500+ tables, the largest one presently at about 1,5 million rows, a few tables around 500 000 rows, and the rest significantly lower (most of them well below 10K). Furthermore, the application is installed at several customer sites already, so we have to take any possible negative effects for existing customer into consideration. Thanks!

  Read the article

• SQL Server giving a weird conversion error

  - by codingguy3000

  Hello Everyone I'm stuck and any help you can give me is greatly appreciated. create table stackoverflow_rules(myguid uniqueidentifier primary key, myvarchar50 varchar(50)) insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('27C4CF31-2C4C-4C78-BBDC-2D0FDAA891CF','9985276') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('6F865BBD-1D79-4931-BCFE-71AD7A14B145','9985275') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C91124D9-CE83-44C6-A979-427858BBCDCE','9985274') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('18D89F3C-D15D-4A27-9695-CE4417A9D752','9985273') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('40C9A127-D50D-440C-A6BF-A3C292B56121','9985272') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('3191CE74-6443-4DF0-ABFB-4083150E27A7','9985271') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('489606B3-8EE8-4308-BD3B-660FEC999B84','9985270') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('7FB986D6-7ACF-4453-B124-E688514D3A84','9985269') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2E1662CB-FBC2-418A-9FFD-453895EE6FA4','9985268') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('6180E683-AA19-4B5D-9AA1-370B9AA8C156','9985267') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('39BDD429-4C49-4351-951F-016B89E700D0','9985267') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('9A09CF26-B168-48D2-9178-EBBD6C0BA5F4','9985267') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('56BA06A7-71F6-4AC2-817A-69A3E800BE54','9985266') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('35D8C2FE-4793-40BC-AECA-10AA722866AE','9985265') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('84162588-D2A2-4B67-869D-2D7A0CB3ABEC','9985264') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('05A8BE08-B0CF-4ADC-A901-2DB6B70713DA','9985263') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('11E1B3F5-5EC0-43BF-B868-B30BCC5F97B3','9985262') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D48875E9-4A2B-4A5E-8C3A-6788ADD2E44E','9985261') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5C29D799-5F86-4B5D-8B31-1AFB9E289417','9985260') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('3FAF4D60-F06A-4754-A26F-61DE6A121E9E','9985259') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4F001BF6-BF60-4F40-AAE1-32CD707E87F8','9985258') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('56A91F39-F9D2-438C-A424-F26ED799F723','9985258') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('F55F72CA-0C2B-4DE7-B725-C9521CD57B23','9985257') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('364808A7-46E6-4639-A14D-6A350A56D2A0','9985256') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('68FA5B18-BBE3-4F1F-A9DE-D46853AD5D4A','9985255') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B0118D37-807A-4D29-9B56-790F3D810C64','9985254') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E998F33E-F05A-4C49-8CC2-B90BCFA9AE0E','9985253') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A0531477-335C-4A7D-A1E7-1DAD54ECB7AD','9985252') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('96540D09-BA49-413B-9FD6-228DF524BE1A','9985251') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('23CD3C18-DAE2-463B-B27C-977488DF9C5F','9985251') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8BF4AE7D-0AF0-47F9-9388-A2D4CA4C3160','9985250') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E1892F4D-471C-4A49-8D68-F9F1E6E9C275','9985249') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('641A62CC-1DEE-4DFD-BC9A-DD47D7C45B18','9985248') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('3AF2F7CA-489D-4A79-A6F5-DB5578F381D0','9985247') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('939B3773-BE13-483C-A27F-5594A23AB6F2','9985247') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('81A5FD90-1E2D-4DB5-A10F-5624A576D566','9985247') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E87109DD-7283-4B60-AB7F-F9A3DD384E52','9985247') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('689A789F-0FFC-45AE-87DF-66C5130338E2','9985246') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4A9D3A2D-940B-4D45-8234-A1C98FF8A2FB','9985246') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('75073565-E623-40FC-AEF3-81620F2514A8','9985245') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('DB583FF8-1635-47C1-8241-D37C015C7642','9985244') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('39EA148B-55D1-4878-925A-39FA8592F451','9985243') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BF1CE2D7-ABD3-460B-A7DC-BD0E2B2A5388','9985242') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B6431717-26F0-436E-9DCC-C0C5240AC329','9985242') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4F22E672-6F3D-454C-ABA7-D9B84D12DDE0','9985241') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('0436E893-DC43-4FF7-8BDC-BD0BF9E9A55D','9985240') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('60B2FE73-3575-4047-B324-63620FEACD6B','9985239') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2041E1E5-F60F-4494-A000-F349F49662EC','9985238') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B89636C8-4648-4058-8DC6-95DCE468CA63','9985237') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4EC1B486-1E9C-4B41-94C1-5B24471BAD3D','9985236') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4C86120E-1A27-4F59-948B-F11D8ACD498E','9985234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E8A1EA7A-5337-4769-9D23-25F7BFB589AF','9985217') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('6E7982F0-5899-4214-A05A-262E05A540CB','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C55B838F-FD63-40E9-97AF-25E02A37ABB7','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('95296596-ED86-4A88-8C46-27CF79D4AFB9','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('149BC6CC-857C-4CD7-B374-29EE6382CFCF','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5D3E88FC-1DB5-4BAF-A16B-29F2A2C7D997','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1FDB6AD4-3860-411E-A247-22B9D00C9053','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('83BD156B-C5ED-460E-95F0-21E8B4254BF8','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2FD09C37-E224-414D-8C41-220B6528EB9C','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A46D0B0D-70E2-4AEF-BF30-2244FFA8EF9E','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('824B7F04-51B4-48F6-920A-1FDE8571E32F','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('79DD6034-A9DC-4AC1-9CD3-338F0521AC99','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BFD35E07-C5DE-4C8B-ADC4-36069655F450','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D655AD53-8107-481B-A1C9-340A7B31EFB6','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('7E6FF0E9-E1F4-4522-AB91-1A64C2AC0E3A','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('3A977BFE-17F6-46FA-8568-1A8ED2F48483','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D95A941D-DEB3-46B5-8B2B-1AC9741824ED','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('55528060-12AE-4C2E-A4A1-11E40881DEAE','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E99B4179-DE6E-4FCB-B7B9-165C05A94424','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('20D2D92B-E45A-4883-A114-109C41E2F278','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('7161CC4A-0B3E-4B97-A973-0C5A7F26CC0D','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5E267539-8412-4423-A82C-0C74C995D561','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('AE173244-38CD-4B8D-A1CB-0DC112AC6F54','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('3ED8BF74-D0D1-4D11-92B3-008F11E34308','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('6F77EAF9-0520-495A-ADB5-027F611E418D','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('34DAFFBC-0733-4EC0-8607-0287DA5929D6','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5266FB2F-2829-4C60-91E7-00D9A0832B8E','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A1EC9933-92F0-4805-93C2-071F503BE816','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('EC19E064-940A-4EEA-9A12-07D2A0680C03','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('7CA5F400-0E57-4A86-B4E1-094720E98B56','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('3A7F95B9-79B6-4323-B390-5B30AE23F66C','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('CCA677CB-8889-40E6-8FDC-54C33DCBAD93','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('345FACAF-90B2-4B2D-B6CF-577F242F28C9','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('20531AFD-21EB-4B75-B50C-5FEABDAE29DB','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A8FF5B5F-7976-43FE-B013-67CEE5F07710','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('AEF6E39A-6CC2-48E8-9999-65D7CD103A45','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8AB565EE-4A53-40B9-9D95-66034FD72B6D','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B0DAC1F6-B7E0-476F-8543-6282203A72C7','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('DACE56ED-5964-44FD-9E35-68E3B409B2D7','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C64F5A8A-1930-4824-9F0E-68EF848F2F86','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('38817195-BDB0-44AC-988D-690BE9E50FD0','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BF4202D8-A23A-48DB-8799-694578EED45A','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D26A3E39-EEA2-4928-82F9-676B3F901021','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('0D3F16C2-237A-4461-9851-6B0555EDADCE','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('F8CCEE52-A31D-4B6D-9F9F-6D53BE7EB919','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BCE3146A-AACE-4CF5-ADF1-3D5E57827D96','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5D6E4347-ABC8-4892-89EC-3FE666A8523B','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8BD465A9-DC91-4960-BCC7-42EAEE51024A','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('54FCE80F-F551-4548-BCE2-4499AB66D93F','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('843C8651-A95D-458F-A6E7-488F5978FB56','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4BE7BC8D-BC97-4F8F-85BB-48CC970B9465','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('6C611A14-11CC-454D-A9C8-48CF0B2776A9','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('50819781-F028-4976-A406-45D88804C566','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1EE5DBE0-0EA3-4F9B-8C78-469D00888892','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('33B87A5D-CB69-4BD2-BEC8-4D90D6A21232','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C31D7CD1-E9BA-4B03-BB11-4DE7022A45AD','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2E1FC057-4C57-4C27-86E4-4EC887B77ABE','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('7811CF7B-2935-47A6-92CB-520C4E0AEC4A','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2DAB5B2D-3D94-4F47-B7F5-536FAF08BCC6','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2F405742-CF20-4995-84D3-976B108DBB99','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2852C9C8-325D-4C82-837E-9D6E751B794F','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('40E87A07-DA9B-4277-90BB-8FA994470CB1','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('732DF392-C8D6-4EEF-B046-8FC6C0DB4DEC','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('AA55681E-FE4A-46E9-8809-928941C165AD','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C146FDD8-EF42-48B4-A357-90CEE93FE902','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A0FEAAAD-8B44-4797-BD1F-A34AC872EC39','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A45F22EE-8740-4A3B-ABB5-A8F7EE32B107','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1A073622-C5D6-41B0-BCC2-8220ED1978BA','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C7CFCCDC-5ADF-4BCF-BBE4-7E6D611B96CC','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A618A9A7-5DAC-4658-9B6F-7FC091C49122','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('0F698448-929F-4E3B-A6B1-810BF66DC9AD','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2FD04ED9-AC24-4E80-8902-7AF2351DAB7B','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2DA5D721-DFDD-4E96-9A5C-7DF7B0FA9ABB','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('76816CF3-FB2E-440D-91E7-7FF179CE2702','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('228A8BC4-D136-4FDA-B006-84FD69D583A0','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('838DCC6F-0C37-4144-9461-892F1DE2A0D4','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E65DF83F-FDA5-4883-9E29-8CAB66297328','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('621547A3-613E-4CB7-9537-8D1FF987ADC7','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2ABB681F-5258-4DF3-A0B8-89962ADDBCB8','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('F54E5C88-17FA-407C-B457-8B69077748E9','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('63D66460-3834-4873-9BD4-74148EC300F4','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('14A19194-457F-40D3-B08E-715EF830FD75','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('75CF2565-D36A-46F6-935E-BFD82144B8A2','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('EDA93745-2009-41F6-B01F-C3F9930C0F67','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('20CFC7EE-7188-49F0-BDEB-C0CAF3610F2C','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('ED6EDD00-2151-4CA7-9F22-BF6DE74B0622','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('EC8DAC77-E516-4B8E-9FB8-C5A4C963563A','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C6FDECC9-24BE-4AA0-B33C-C9195DC630B0','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BD9890BA-8F8A-4596-B0F0-BA2F3467E5B4','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2F496F30-1E08-4174-ABE4-BBE3977268EF','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2CD7D3D2-77D4-43DE-A44F-B248AAF8891F','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('FFC7E6E7-00E9-41E8-BD11-B0EFD4BA3971','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B8348F9C-D57F-4561-9981-B14DAEE7257B','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2CAE1761-8DB0-4D18-8FF6-AD79D44EF699','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('9A241CB7-1FAE-4767-8E13-AF3A66123DC0','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B836DB33-FB5A-4FF7-A293-D7A29488A6F6','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('23207756-F6E1-406C-AEAC-DFC1710E3E41','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('64ED1587-8791-414F-B2EA-E265584BECE9','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('07442948-0FE7-4EDD-8779-E4808B20852C','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('ACAE3351-3EDF-43E3-8021-E4CBAF20BA55','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1E96680B-1E92-40F2-AAAE-E4D524206982','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('57A0F1D0-8029-4110-9C2A-D3A2F13E6776','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D0A76745-1930-4755-90EA-D3CA0240BA6D','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5379B540-4DCC-4A71-BE19-D1DA4B808A4D','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B41B60EB-5C83-4CA6-8768-D2226A164FB6','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('31CA2727-7227-4377-B127-D261AA0CD304','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BD7102BB-FA67-4A33-82C4-D3616ED7CB3F','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('7090FCA6-144A-430B-A609-CDDFB39C4D25','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('382BE0D2-A92A-4D73-B2CE-D640A2BBA523','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1A4011C0-40C8-4ABD-8ACF-D6D3A220B940','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('53A62E1F-5926-4DEA-A7FB-C99B14A2120D','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('24C84EE0-70DF-4602-B133-F1CB765F2B29','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B40C80C7-26C0-43F9-9B8A-F2C46A6FD79F','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8F9FE478-6961-4042-A62D-F464F21BFC46','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('6E9B27D8-C963-4413-ABB5-F31F307F2AE1','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1CCAB652-042A-4C6F-B89B-ECBFFCA468C6','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('FDA7C815-F4ED-4E6D-AE95-ED18005651EB','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('6D48A842-B5F9-45AA-BC3C-EF74C911E2FC','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('571A48F3-10E2-419C-8E72-EB4B833FA2A2','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('27C54188-4CD7-447D-9C47-E7C7F4A87A47','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('0F8E94BC-1612-4086-A6C1-E883C83758E4','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('24315A1A-CFD9-4984-AF64-F9A79E960D45','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('38602998-8149-4B6A-91EA-F9D4B93810A6','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1FDB6A11-E422-4EA1-B4AC-FDD1197BB7F3','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('FDDCB1EA-37C9-4833-BDD8-FEFDEEF0A749','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5241815C-CE10-4C08-BE01-CB2D1012CCF0','9980066') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D0E5E79E-4502-42F8-B8C6-EDE3D20526B4','9970234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B173FC5D-BAB3-4942-A904-D9D3BA66A1ED','9960234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D5C2A2D9-2BA6-4059-896C-B464C8C8CB5F','9960234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('32B865C7-1D67-457A-9550-DFDBCBFB12C6','9951166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('82F0A99B-0C88-44EB-BE50-265C6C4C1B86','9400000') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BDE9DC0D-B9A7-4AC9-83D5-8F9ED5F25FDA','9299199') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2FE2415A-9D51-4AD4-9679-74BDA93DC6A6','9299166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4BC3D4FF-5FBB-484E-8BC6-CFE90706E3D2','9299111') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('0FC22F14-A499-4C8C-9E6B-0CF613ACF505','9281266') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('AC6B2795-A9A0-40DF-9BAF-04D4A74F4B9B','9281166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('DAA73B60-65B9-46B2-B1AC-76A74B621700','9281166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D419DCBB-A76E-47DF-A59D-803AFAB770C5','9281166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('405847E0-4764-4409-81E8-8ECCCAAE94BB','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('76D59559-F986-45EF-9F74-7870D97A377D','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('3F6F78A9-7930-4F76-839F-77304396CBC3','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2C1A62F2-B783-432B-B83A-6BD8B29EE2DE','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D371D319-6E88-4286-A46E-6C1905ADD6AC','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('10C42C2E-DC1A-43C4-959C-98D3A798D631','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('215F0003-188D-45C9-85BE-9B3811760CCB','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4DD2BA43-BA1C-44BE-8C10-996454D63205','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('26D863E7-6F96-42BC-A2BA-99B30D94F6D9','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('625A2793-A60F-4FE7-9BD4-A953877B258D','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5B5A2538-74E0-4A6F-9929-AA29BA3BDCCE','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B8597353-0254-42AB-BAF7-AA4DAF195CC8','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('22F392BC-B42C-434F-9E32-AB8DFFC6EA76','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E703EEE4-82B1-43C0-914F-ABCF3EF53E91','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('09BD6548-7395-4450-A7CA-D0AB0631F222','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('71D737EB-59CA-4685-827D-E17A0B4FA44D','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('F09ACB1E-64B0-4F29-86BF-E323C5347883','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8A39E85B-8E49-44C1-8B4A-B9D79CC3F97F','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E3BE436C-0BEC-45CE-9680-AFCE70D59B84','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('915D4F2A-8430-479F-84ED-064A3D6889DA','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('FF6DEFF5-072D-4E14-A6C2-0EF4862CCF28','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2E7944D1-5A85-4D85-9660-138F30BED95C','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E449E8A8-1CE4-49DE-898F-1C357777B674','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('65E89A21-5908-4913-840A-28E625F4C003','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E23175FD-B60E-4FD4-A99A-2DB232BCB6B1','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A521CC05-21C1-4759-AA00-384014F9C4CB','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('218CE896-8D3F-447B-A504-33428F797CE2','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D4A3A407-20BF-481D-95DE-2C2BED13FD60','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B5FCEB1B-3F0D-4DFE-B47D-4D44E88879A1','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('519BB489-1606-4A64-BA49-456DE79FC471','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('837D5167-CE68-4840-9592-432D371EE3AF','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('F140182F-844E-4CA7-BAA1-6A96FA726A93','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8FB3AE45-3BFF-4DBF-ABAE-61A97EE73F36','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('33D59F0B-DAD6-4608-BF70-F2C49805FF54','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5BFB5CEC-1322-49B0-A626-EC94092998A3','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8AB2E1F8-A4F6-48AC-B789-FB1F46A89617','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('CD559FD0-552F-4F54-A638-F86878413D7B','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D23AC171-E7E8-4310-B3B5-1253CCA33E5C','9251166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('0E777743-0C70-4D76-9293-076F9DBC02EB','9251166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B0CDE199-9BDF-4CDD-8E32-1384CB8512B4','9200166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1F48F171-5179-4EC9-9554-2DA6EF60B9E8','9002266') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A9168993-F6AF-4F81-A166-441411E72691','9001166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('25FB4906-2AC8-4A29-B077-C4BC681D3227','9000001') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('02E14983-49E2-4867-B0C2-0BCF9BC3BAB6','8860235') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('53F915DE-1A8A-4A75-A661-0CAB56F39B11','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('834F1EB8-AEA0-435F-81AF-0C212BD54A17','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('797AFF3A-8CB0-4AE8-8430-0ED04A72394B','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('56B83693-3F46-4D8F-93A8-098517C96E94','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1559018C-71F3-45FC-9642-09DFCC06EA78','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('04A86146-97FC-46C4-B1FE-07E916509908','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1A3367B3-CB36-40CA-8D7D-02206840089A','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('33626BD1-AED2-4AEF-9289-199F641FDFE0','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8468E795-71A8-4417-8179-1778FD7E915E','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('9EE6FF40-AAFB-46A8-8655-186515189AB8','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D314A6A4-BBB5-4499-9EF4-1B37EA9131B6','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('788898AF-48E6-4DA0-BDBB-12871FE81D35','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('34D55FA5-FF82-49B5-A4EF-144999BB1B4F','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C8FF93B1-EB7C-4711-85BA-14C78B7A27C1','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('54199346-624C-4B1E-8293-14EE9C6EF23B','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5105C133-9120-4075-9EB6-151569E0719D','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D03366DB-BC4A-44CC-ABC8-151F627E2A95','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('40EF76A3-2250-4840-90C1-1577AE855EEE','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8E229744-7528-4727-880A-168331E72ED0','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('10F66C0C-C97B-4A8B-9FAC-160F3AA09A62','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8173CB1C-A65D-4B89-9BD3-2DC4BA2F4C72','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1CEAE246-6323-402D-95DB-2AC25DF1FD83','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BB859D4A-3B1C-40FC-8C74-2BD44902894C','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A31C45AF-D149-4789-A22D-2FB3E6A17627','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('52F98EEC-D3AC-429C-948F-306FA865EDE7','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('06E84032-C102-49F4-B544-3169FC1C62F4','8860234') insert into stackoverflo

  Read the article

• Group by SQL with count

  - by snorlaks

  Lets say we have got rows like that: MyTable ID Name Product 1 Adam x 2 Adam y 3 Adam z 4 Peter a 5 Peter b Using query like: Select Name, Count(Product) from MyTable group by Name results will be: Adam 3 Peter 2 But I would like results like: 1 Adam x 3 2 Adam y 3 3 Adam z 3 4 Peter a 2 5 Peter b 2 I hope Ypu know what I mean Could You help me with that query, thanks for help, Bye

  Read the article

• HTML text input and using the input as a variable in a script(tcl)/sql(sqlite)

  - by Fantastic Fourier

  Hello all, I'm very VERY new at this whole web thing. And I'm just very confused in general. Basically, what I want to do is take an input via text using HTML and adding that input to database, table trans. Should be simple but I am lost. <li>Transaction Number</li> <li><input type=|text| name=|tnumber| </li> // do i need to use value? <li>Employee Name</li> <li><input type=|text| name=|ename| </li> <li><input type=|SUBMIT| value=|Add|></li> ...... ...... sqlite3 db $::env(ROOT)/database.db mb eval {INSERT INTO trans VALUES ($tnumber, $ename} mb close They are both in a same file and there are only two fields to the database to keep things simple. What I can see here is that tnumber and ename aren't declared as variables. So how do I do that so that the text input is assigned to respective variables?

  Read the article

• Using MS SQL Server Analysis Services to create cubes on hierarchical data

  - by Jeff Meatball Yang

  I have a hierarchy, like an ProductDimension hierarchy. Currently, I query this table using the Nested Sets methodology. I write the usual star-schema joins to get a time-series report of groups of Products (Batches, CountryOfOrigin, ProductLine, etc.). I'm currently investigating using SSAS cubes- but can a cube model this?

  Read the article

• Complex query making site extremely slow

  - by Basit

  select SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS DISTINCT media.*, username from album as album, album_permission as permission, user as user, media as media , word_tag as word_tag, tag as tag where ((media.album_id = album.album_id and album.private = 'yes' and album.album_id = permission.album_id and (permission.email = '' or permission.user_id = '') ) or (media.album_id = album.album_id and album.private = 'no' ) or media.album_id = '0' ) and media.status = '1' and media.user_id = user.user_id and word_tag.media_id = media.media_id and word_tag.tag_id = tag.tag_id and tag.name in ('justin','bieber','malfunction','katherine','heigl','wardrobe','cinetube') and media.media_type = 'video' and media.media_id not in ('YHL6a5z8MV4') group by media.media_id order by RAND() #there is limit too, by 20 rows.. i dont know where to begin explaining about this query, but please forgive me and ask me if you have any question. following is the explanation. SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS is calculating how many rows are there and will be using for pagination, so it counts total records, even tho only 20 is showing. DISTINCT will stop the repeated row to display. username is from user table. album, album_permission. its checking if album is private and if it is, then check if user has permission, by user_id. i think rest is easy to understand, but if you need to know more about it, then please ask. im really frustrated by this query and site is very slow or not opening sometimes cause of this query. please help

  Read the article

• SQL : where vs. on in join

  - by Erwin

  Perhaps a dumb question, but consider these 2 tables : T1 Store Year 01 2009 02 2009 03 2009 01 2010 02 2010 03 2010 T2 Store 02 Why is this INNER JOIN giving me the results I want (filtering the [year] in the ON clause) : select t1.* from t1 inner join t2 on t1.store = t2.store and t1.[year] = '2009' Store Year 02 2009 And why the LEFT OUTER JOIN include records of year 2010 ? select t1.* from t1 left outer join t2 on t1.store = t2.store and t1.year = '2009' where t2.store is null 01 2009 03 2009 01 2010 02 2010 03 2010 And I have to write the [year] filter in the 'WHERE' clause : select t1.* from t1 left outer join t2 on t1.store = t2.store where t2.store is null and t1.year = '2009' 01 2009 03 2009 Like I said, perhaps a dumb question, but it's bugging me !

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458  | Next Page >