Search Results

Search found 41565 results on 1663 pages for 'sql xml'.

Page 457/1663 | < Previous Page | 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464  | Next Page >

  • SQL Server > Query > Column Names

    - by pojomx
    Hi, I'm here again- I have something like this Select A.a, A.b, A.a+A.b as c, (A.a+A.b*2)+A.d as d from Table But i want to know, if it is possible, to make it work with something like this: Select A.a,A.b,A.a+A.b as c, (c*2)+A.d as d from Table Thank you

    Read the article

  • SQL Syntax for testing objects before creating views & functions

    - by Scott Weinstein
    I'm trying to figure out the syntax for creating a view (or function) but only if a dependent CLR assembly exits. I've tried both IF EXISTS (SELECT name FROM sys.assemblies WHERE name = 'MyCLRAssembly') begin create view dbo.MyView as select GETDATE() as C1 end and IF EXISTS (SELECT name FROM sys.assemblies WHERE name = 'MyCLRAssembly') create view dbo.MyView as select GETDATE() as C1 go Neither work. I get Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 2 Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'view'. How can this be done?

    Read the article

  • Getting maximum value from table using LINQ

    - by Tena
    I have a table in my database. I want to get the maximum value of a column named NumOfView. I used this code: var advert=(from ad in storedb.Ads where ad.AdScope == "1" select ad.NumOfView).Max(); It works but when there are two or more same maximum values it doesn't work and this message appears: Sequence contains more than one element What should I do now? Your answers will be very helpfull. Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to use XML namespace prefixes without xmlns="..." everywhere? (.NET)

    - by LonelyPixel
    The subject is probably too short to explain it... I'm writing out XML files with no namespace stuff at all, for some application. That part I cannot change. But now I'm going to extend those files with my own application-defined element names, and I'd like to put them in a different namespace. For this, the result should look like this: <doc xmlns:x="urn:my-app-uri"> <a>existing element name</a> <x:addon>my additional element name</x:addon> </doc> I've used an XmlNamespaceManager and added my URI with the prefix "x" to it. I've also passed it to each CreateElement for my additional element names. But the nearest I can get is this: <doc> <a>existing element name</a> <addon xmlns="urn:my-app-uri">my additional element name</addon> </doc> Or maybe also <x:addon xmlns:x="urn:my-app-uri">my additional element name</x:addon> So the point is that my URI is written to every single of my additional elements, and no common prefix is written to the document element where I'd like to have it. How can I get the above XML result with .NET?

    Read the article

  • Solution for this SQL query?

    - by homeWorkBoy
    Suppose you have these tables: Table Name: Salesman Fields: S_ID(Primary Key), Name Table Name: Region_1 Fields: Reg_ID(Primary Key), S_ID(Foreign Key), sales Table Name: Region_2 Fields: Reg_ID(Primary Key), S_ID(Foreign Key), sales Table Name: Region_3 Fields: Reg_ID(Primary Key), S_ID(Foreign Key), sales Table Name: Region_4 Fields: Reg_ID(Primary Key), S_ID(Foreign Key), sales Query 1: Find out total of sales of each salesman in all the regions. Query 2: Find out total of sales of a particual salesman in all the regions. (if the first one is solved I think this will be easy. :-) )

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2005 Transactions

    - by mcallec
    I have a long running stored proc (approx 30 mins) which is currently running within a transaction (isolation level snapshot). I've set the transaction to snapshot to avoid locking records preventing other processes from accessing the data. What I'm trying to do is write to and read from a status table, but although we're in a transaction I'd like to write to and read from the status table as if I'm not in a transaction. I need this so that other processes can read any updates to this table by my stored proc, and this stored proc can also read any inserts made by other processes. I realise that having my entire stored proc running within a transaction isn't recommended, but this has been done for other reasons and we need to stick with that approach. So my question is within a transaction, is it possible to execute a query or call a stored proc which effectively isn't enlisted in the transaction?

    Read the article

  • saving an image object in sql server database from action method

    - by user3532152
    [HttpPost] public void Test(HttpPostedFileBase file) { UsersContext db = new UsersContext(); byte[] image = new byte[file.ContentLength]; file.InputStream.Read(image, 0, image.Length); CrimeReport i = new CrimeReport { ImageId=1, ImageName="Anjli",ImageContent = image, Active=true }; db.CrimeReports.Add(i); db.SaveChanges(); } I am getting an exception on db.CrimeReports.Add(i);

    Read the article

  • which one is a faster/better sql practice?

    - by artsince
    Suppose I have a 2 column table (id, flag) and id is sequential. I expect this table to contain a lot of records. I want to periodically select the first row not flagged and update it. Some of the records on the way may have already been flagged, so I want to skip them. Does it make more sense if I store the last id I flagged and use it in my select statement, like select * from mytable where id > my_last_id order by id asc limit 1 or simply get the first unflagged row, like: select * from mytable where flagged = 'F' order by id asc limit 1 Thank you!

    Read the article

  • SQL more elegant combination of boolean checks possible?

    - by Matze
    Call me pedantic but is there a more elegant way to combine all those checks? SELECT * FROM [TABLE1] WHERE [path] = 'RECEIVE' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE '10.48.20.10' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE '0.%' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE '127.%' ORDER BY [date],[time] DESC; To something like this: SELECT * FROM [TABLE1] WHERE [path] = 'RECEIVE' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE IN ('10.48.20.10','0.%','127.%', .... ) ORDER BY [date],[time] DESC;

    Read the article

  • SQL 2000 Multiple IF Statements

    - by Spidermain50
    I get a error when I try to use multiple IF statements. This is the error... "Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure fnTNAccidentIndicator, Line 81 Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'END'." This is the structure of my code... USE SS_TNRecords_Accident SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON GO CREATE FUNCTION dbo.fnTNAccidentIndicator ( @inAccidentNumber nvarchar, @inIndicatorMode int ) RETURNS nvarchar AS BEGIN DECLARE @AlcoholInd nvarchar DECLARE @DrugInd nvarchar DECLARE @SpeedInd nvarchar DECLARE @ReturnValue nvarchar SET @AlcoholInd = '1' SET @DrugInd = '2' SET @SpeedInd = '3' SET @ReturnValue = 'N' IF (@inIndicatorMode = @AlcoholInd) BEGIN --select statment IF (@@ROWCOUNT > 0) BEGIN @ReturnValue = 'Y' END END IF (@inIndicatorMode = @DrugInd) BEGIN --select statment IF (@@ROWCOUNT > 0) BEGIN @ReturnValue = 'Y' END END IF (@inIndicatorMode = @SpeedInd) BEGIN --select statment IF (@@ROWCOUNT > 0) BEGIN @ReturnValue = 'Y' END END Return @ReturnValue END GO

    Read the article

  • SQL Trigger Need to set x from a value

    - by Eric
    Im stuck on a the type of trigger needed to for this constraint. I will have a price and a commission. The price determines the commission amount, < 100 - 4%, < 200 - 5% etc. My idea. the database contains a separate table that will hold 4 price values , 101, 201, 401, 601, with their own matching comission %, this will be called PC. When i create a property listing i want to calculate the commission they earn depending on the price entered. on insert, i need to check the new.price and compare it to the prices in PC. Once new.price is less than the price tuple, i set the price to that commission value create or replace TRIGGER findCommission BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON HASLISTING FOR each ROW BEGIN IF (:NEW.ASKING_PRICE < 100001) THEN :NEW.COMMISSION = 6.0; END IF; IF (:NEW.ASKING_PRICE < 250001) THEN :NEW.COMMISSION = 5.5; END IF; IF (:NEW.ASKING_PRICE < 1000001) THEN :NEW.COMMISSION = 5.0; END IF; IF (:NEW.ASKING_PRICE > 1000000) THEN :NEW.COMMISSION = 4.0; END IF; END;

    Read the article

  • Is this possible in sql server 2005?

    - by chandru_cp
    This is my queries select ClientName,ClientMobNo from Clients select DriverName,DriverMobNo from Drivers It gives me two result tables... But i want to combine both the result tables into a single table... I tried union and union all it doesn't give me what i want.... Note: There is no relationship between the two tables...... There may be 200 clients and 100 drivers...

    Read the article

  • Sql query number of occurance

    - by phenevo
    Hi, I wanna to have query: Select cars.* from cars where cars.code in ( select carCode from articles where numberofrecords with this car (it is not a column) >1 and Accepted=1 order by date ) How to write it?

    Read the article

  • SUM minutes SQL server

    - by sandu
    HI guys, My litle problem goes like this : I have this columns : PHONE_NR , TIME ( time field ), Meaning the calling telephone number and call duration. I need to group phone nr and sum the minutes. Filds looks like this : nr time 726028xxx 00:07:07 735560css 00:07:37 726028xxx 00:07:55

    Read the article

  • T-SQL Query to Get SUM(COUNT())

    - by Ted
    Hi, I am planning to get a report for a table with following table structure: ID RequestDate ----------------------------- 1 2010/01/01 2 2010/02/14 3 2010/03/20 4 2010/01/07 5 2009/03/31 I want the results as: I D_Count RequestDate Sum ----------------------------------------- 2 2010/01 2 1 2010/02 3 2 2010/03 5 Pls help.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464  | Next Page >