Search Results

Search found 35456 results on 1419 pages for 'android development'.

Page 467/1419 | < Previous Page | 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474  | Next Page >

  • « Je peux m'emparer de votre mobile sous Android », affirme un ancien de la NSA qui exploite la gestion du NFC dans l'OS

    « Je peux m'emparer de votre mobile sous Android », affirme un ancien de la NSA Son exploit utilise une particularité de la gestion du NFC dans l'OS de Google En collaboration avec Gordon Fowler La célèbre conférence de hacking du Black Hat, a été particulièrement remplie du côté de la plateforme Android, avec des attaques. Certains experts en sécurité, à l'image de Sean Shulte de Trustwave's SpiderLabs, confirment que « Google a fait des progrès mais les créateurs de logiciels malicieux avancent à grand pas ». Et le nombre de failles mises à jour augmente avec la popularité grandissante de l'OS qui attire de plus en plus les regards des hacker...

    Read the article

  • Android 5.0 (ou 4.1) dévoilé ce soir au Google I/O, la statue de « Jelly Beans » a été installée dans les jardins de Google

    Android 5.0 ou 4.1 dévoilé ce soir au Google I/O La statue de « Jelly Beans » a été installée dans les jardins de Google C'est donc quasi-officiel, la prochaine version d'Android sera présentée ce soir lors du Google I/O, la conférence annuelle de Google dédiée aux développeurs. La représentation du nouveau dessert qui sert de surnom à cette version vient en effet d'être installée dans les jardins du siège social de Google. Sa photo a été publiée hier soir sur un des Google+ officiels de l'éditeur : [IMG]http://ftp-developpez.com/gordon-fowler/Jelly%20Beans%20Garden.jpg[/IMG]Les Jelly Beans (ou « bonbon haricot ») sont l'équivalent américain des Dragibus.

    Read the article

  • Google Now : Google revient à ses fondamentaux dans Android et fait de la recherche la « killing feature » de Jelly Bean

    Google Now : Google revient à ses fondamentaux dans Android Et fait de la recherche la « killing feature » de Jelly Bean Nous vous en parlions avant-hier soir, dans le cadre du lancement d'Android 4.1 : Google a repensé la recherche dans son OS mobile avec un service très prometteur, Google Now. Un service déjà présenté comme le « porte étendard » de Jelly Beans auprès du grand public. Google revient aujourd'hui en détail sur cette nouveauté. « Jusqu'à présent, les smartphones avaient besoin que l'utilisateur leur dise quoi faire. Mais aujourd'hui, il y a Google Now », écrit l'éditeur. « La nouvelle fonct...

    Read the article

  • How to obtain flow while pair programming in agile development?

    - by bizso09
    Flow is is concept introduced by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi In short, it means what most to get into the "zone". You feel immeresed in the task you are doing, you are in deep focus and concentration and the task difficulty is just right for you, but challenging at the same time. When people acquire flow their prodctivity shoots up. Programming requires great deal of mental focus and programmers need to juggle several things in their mind at once. Many like to work in a quite environment where they can direct their full attention to the task. If they are interreupted, it may take several minutes, sometimes hours to get back into flow. I understand that agile way of doing software development is called pair prograaming. This is pormoted in Extreme programming too. It means you put the whole software development team in one room so that communication is seamless. You do programming with your pair because this way you get instant code reviews and fix bugs sooner. However, I alwys had problem obtaining flow while doing pair programming because of the contant stream of interrupts. I'm thinking deep about an issue then all of sudden someone asks me a question from another pair. My train of thought is all lost. How can you obtain and keep flow while doing agile pair programming?

    Read the article

  • Android : Pourquoi Apple n'attaque-t-il pas directement Google ? Eric Schmidt étonné que la firme vise plutôt les constructeurs

    Android : Pourquoi Apple n'attaque-t-il pas directement Google ? Eric Schmidt étonné que la firme vise plutôt les constructeurs Dans un entretien accordé au magazine Wall Street Journal concernant les relations tendues entre Google et Apple, Eric Schmidt, Président du conseil d'administration de Google, exprime son étonnement au fait qu'Apple n'attaque pas directement Google en justice pour violation de brevets. La firme à la pomme croquée depuis plusieurs années est en conflit avec les constructeurs de terminaux Android, qu'elle accuse de violer dans leurs dispositifs ses propriétés intellectuelles. Dans sa dernière plainte contre Samsung, Apple s'attaque directement à l...

    Read the article

  • Is there an established or defined best practice for source control branching between development and production builds?

    - by Matthew Patrick Cashatt
    Thanks for looking. I struggled in how to phrase my question, so let me give an example in hopes of making more clear what I am after: I currently work on a dev team responsible for maintaining and adding features to a web application. We have a development server and we use source control (TFS). Each day everyone checks in their code and when the code (running on the dev server) passes our QA/QC program, it goes to production. Recently, however, we had a bug in production which required an immediate production fix. The problem was that several of us developers had code checked in that was not ready for production so we had to either quickly complete and QA the code, or roll back everything, undo pending changes, etc. In other words, it was a mess. This made me wonder: Is there an established design pattern that prevents this type of scenario. It seems like there must be some "textbook" answer to this, but I am unsure what that would be. Perhaps a development branch of the code and a "release-ready" or production branch of the code?

    Read the article

  • iOS ou Android, quelle est la plate-forme la plus sécurisée ? Symantec penche en faveur d'iOS malgré ses failles 10 fois plus nombreuses

    iOS ou Android, quelle est la plate-forme mobile la plus sécurisée ? Symantec penche en faveur d'iOS en dépit de ses vulnérabilités 10 fois plus nombreuses La sécurité des plateformes mobiles est certes meilleure que celle des ordinateurs, mais elle reste insuffisante d'après le nouveau rapport de Symantec intitulé « regard sur la sécurité des périphériques mobiles : analyse des approches de sécurités employées sur Apple iOS et Google Android ». Ce document de 23 pages affirme sans surprise que les périphériques mobiles offrent formellement plus de sécurité que les plateformes Desktop, pour peu que l'on ne transgresse pas les lignes de conduite imposées par les éditeurs de ...

    Read the article

  • At what point would you drop some of your principles of software development for the sake of more money?

    - by MeshMan
    I'd like to throw this question out there to interestingly see where the medium is. I'm going to admit that in my last 12 months, I picked up TDD and a lot of the Agile values in software development. I was so overwhelmed with how much better my development of software became that I would never drop them out of principle. Until...I was offered a contracting role that doubled my take home pay for the year. The company I joined didn't follow any specific methodology, the team hadn't heard of anything like code smells, SOLID, etc., and I certainly wasn't going to get away with spending time doing TDD if the team had never even seen unit testing in practice. Am I a sell out? No, not completely... Code will always been written "cleanly" (as per Uncle Bob's teachings) and the principles of SOLID will always be applied to the code that I write as they are needed. Testing was dropped for me though, the company couldn't afford to have such a unknown handed to the team who quite frankly, even I did create test frameworks, they would never use/maintain the test framework correctly. Using that as an example, what point would you say a developer should never drop his craftsmanship principles for the sake of money/other benefits to them personally? I understand that this can be a very personal opinion on how concerned one is to their own needs, business needs, and the sake of craftsmanship etc. But one can consider that for example testing can be dropped if the company decided they would rather have a test team, than rather understand unit testing in programming, would that be something you could forgive yourself for like I did? So given that there is something you would drop, there usually should be an equal cost in the business that makes up for what you drop - hopefully, unless of course you are pretty much out for lining your own pockets and not community/social collaborating ;). Double your money, go back to RAD? Or walk on, and look for someone doing Agile, and never look back...

    Read the article

  • Emacs/Vim/Vi - do they have a place in modern software development ecosystem? [closed]

    - by Anton Gogolev
    Watching all those screencasts (and listening all those podcasts) with more-or-less famous hackers/programmers I hear that many of those use emacs/vi(m) for their daily work. Now, I myself tried using both emacs and vim, and I honestly cannot understand why would anybody use these for any kind of serious development. The most advertised feature is something along the lines of "you'll be able to work with text (meaning cutting, pasting, duplicating, moving, etc) up to ten times faster than with conventional IDEs", but I don't buy that. When has the success of a software project been defined by how fast a programmer can juggle lines in a text editor or by saving a couple of keystrokes here and there? Plugins and extensions? I bet nothing comes close to R# or IDEA in terms of refactoring support ("Rename" refactoring implemented by means of "Search and Replace" is not a refactoring IMO); others are trivial. Ubiquitous and available everywhere? So what? How often do you find yourself editing files over a 300 baud connection on an esoteric *nix installation without a VCS? So here goes: do said editors have a justified place in a modern software development ecosystem?

    Read the article

  • Google lance la version alpha d'un traducteur universel oral pour Android, disponible aujourd'hui pour l'Anglais et l'Espagnol

    Google lance la version alpha d'un traducteur universel oral Pour Android, disponible aujourd'hui pour l'Anglais et l'Espagnol Google vient de lancer une version expérimentale d'un nouveau produit appelé « Conversation Mode », dans la lignée de Google Translate pour les appareils sous Android. Il s'agit d'une nouvelle interface de Google Translate qui a pour ambition de permettre à deux personnes , qui ne parlent pas la même langue, d'avoir une conversation audio fluide. Chacun des deux utilisateurs entendra donc l'autre s'adresser à lui dans la langue qu'il comprend. Les geek en ont rêvé, Google l'a fait ? Oui, mais pas tout à fait. Conversation Mod...

    Read the article

  • Is there a precedent for the license on a compiler restricting the kind of development you can use it for?

    - by Jim McKeeth
    It was recently let slip that the new EULA for Delphi XE3 will prohibit Client Server development with the Professional edition without the additional purchase of a Client Server license pack. This is not to say the Professional version will lack the features, but the license will specifically prohibit the developer from using the compiler for a specific class of development, even with 3rd party or home grown solutions. So my question is if there is a precedent of a compiler or similar creative tool prohibiting the class of work you can use it for. Specifically a commercially licensed "professional" tool like Delphi XE3. Also, would such a restriction be legally enforceable? I know there have been educational edition or starter edition tools in the past that have restricted their use for commercial purposes, but those were not sold as "professional" tools. Also I know that a lot of computing software and equipment will have a disclaimer that it is not for use in "life support equipment" or "nuclear power" but that is more of avoiding liability than prohibiting activity. Seems like I recall Microsoft putting a restriction in FrontPage that you couldn't use it to create a web site that reflected poorly on Microsoft, but they pulled that restriction before it could be tested legally.

    Read the article

  • How to refactor when all your development is on branches?

    - by Mark
    At my company, all of our development (bug fixes and new features) is done on separate branches. When it's complete, we send it off to QA who tests it on that branch, and when they give us the green light, we merge it into our main branch. This could take anywhere between a day and a year. If we try to squeeze any refactoring in on a branch, we don't know how long it will be "out" for, so it can cause many conflicts when it's merged back in. For example, let's say I want to rename a function because the feature I'm working on is making heavy use of this function, and I found that it's name doesn't really fit its purpose (again, this is just an example). So I go around and find every usage of this function, and rename them all to its new name, and everything works perfectly, so I send it off to QA. Meanwhile, new development is happening, and my renamed function doesn't exist on any of the branches that are being forked off main. When my issue gets merged back in, they're all going to break. Is there any way of dealing with this? It's not like management will ever approve a refactor-only issue so it has to be squeezed in with other work. It can't be developed directly on main because all changes have to go through QA and no one wants to be the jerk that broke main so that he could do a little bit of non-essential refactoring.

    Read the article

  • Assuming "clean code/architecture" is there a difference in "effort" between PHP or Java/J2EE web application development?

    - by PhD
    A client asked us to estimate effort when selecting PHP as the implementation language for his next web-based application. We spent about a week exploring PHP, prototyping, testing etc., We are quite new to this language - may have hacked around it in the past but, let's go with PHP-noobs but application development experts (for the lack of a better, less flattering word :) It seems, that if we write, clean maintainable code, follow separation of concerns, enterprise architecture patters (DAOs etc.) the 'effort' in creating an object-oriented PHP based web-application seems to be the same for a Java based one. Here's our equation for estimating the effort (development/delivery time): ConstructionEffort = f(analysis, design, coding, testing, review, deployment) We were specifically comparing effort estimates in creating an enterprise application with the following: PHP + CakePHP/CodeIgniter (should we have considered others?) Java + Spring + Restlet It's an end-to-end application: Client: Javascript/jQuery + HTML/CSS Middle tier/Business Logic - (Still evaluating PHP/Java) Database: MySQL The effort estimates of the 1st and 3rd tier are constant and relatively independent of the middle tier's technology. At a high level with an initial breakdown into user stories of the requested features as well as a high-level SWAG on the sheer number of classes/SLOC that would be required for PHP doesn't seem to differ by much from what is required of the same in Java. Is this correct? We are basing our initial estimates on the initial prototyping/coding we've done with PHP - we are currently disregarding fluency with the language as a factor, since that'll be an initial hurdle and not a long term impediment IMHO (we also have sufficient time to become quite fluent with PHP). I'm interested in knowing the programmers' perspective with respect to effort when creating similar applications with either of the languages to justify choosing one over the other. Are we missing something here? It seems we are going against popular belief of PHP being quicker to market (or we being very fluent with Java have our vision clouded). It doesn't seem to have any coding/programming effort saving from what we/ve played around with.

    Read the article

  • Are there any significant advantages to using a native language for mobile app development?

    - by Karl Daniel
    Forgive me if this question has already been answered but I couldn't quite find the answer I was looking for. What I wanted to know was, is there any significant advantage to using a native language when developing and deploying apps to a mobile environment? The reason I ask is for a long while now I've been using Objective-C, Apple's native language for iOS, to build my apps. However I've been wondering whether or not there is any real benefit to doing this, over using a non-native language like JavaScript and then deploying it through a service like 'Phone Gap'? I do stress 'significant' advantages as native languages are always more likely to have the upper hand when it comes to speed and access to the latest APIs. However in general I don't see using a non-native language or a service like 'Phone Gap' causing and major slow down to my apps or restricting my development. Additionally having the ability to deploy to multiple services is also very handy indeed. This is why I put the question, are there any significant advantages to using a native language for mobile app development?

    Read the article

  • Les processeurs Clover Trail seront compatibles avec Linux et Android, un porte-parole d'Intel le confirme dans un email

    Les processeurs Clover Trail seront finalement compatibles Linux et Android Un porte-parole d'Intel le confirme dans un email Clover Trail est la lignée de processeurs qui représente la nouvelle génération d'Intel Atom. L'entreprise avait annoncé dans la récente Intel Developer Conference que ces processeurs seraient exclusifs à Windows 8. [IMG]http://idelways.developpez.com/news/images/Intel-Logo.jpg[/IMG] Mais dans un email envoyé par le porte-parole d'Intel Kathryn Gill, l'entreprise affirme avoir changé de stratégie avec « des plans pour une autre version de cette plateforme [Trail Cover] pour Linux et Android ; cependant, nous ne commentons pas pour l...

    Read the article

  • Why is a software development life-cycle so inefficient?

    - by user87166
    Currently the software development lifecycle followed in the IT company I work at is: The "Business" works with a solution manager to build a Business Requirement document The solution manager works with the Program manager to build a Functional Spec The PM works with the engineering lead to develop a release plan and with the engineering team to develop technical specifications If there are any clarifications required, developers contact the PM who contacts the solution manager who contacts the business and all the way back introducing a latency of nearly 24 hours and massive email chains for any clarifications By the time the tech spec is made, nearly 1 month has passed in back and forth Now, 2 weeks go to development while the test writes test cases Code is dropped formally to test, test starts raising bugs. Even if there is 1 root cause for 10 different issues, and its an easily fixed one, developers are not allowed to give fresh code to test for the next 1 week. After 2-3 such drops to test the code is given to the ops team as a "golden drop" ( 2 months passed from the beginning) Ops team will now deploy the code in a staging environment. If it runs stable for a week, it will be promoted to UAT and after 2 weeks of that it will be promoted to prod. If there are any bugs found here, well, applying for a visa requires less paperwork This entire process is followed even if a single SSRS report is to be released. How do other companies process such requirements? I'm wondering why, the business cannot just drop the requirements to developers, developers build and deploy to UAT themselves, expose it to the business who raise functional bugs and after fixing those promote to prod. (even for more complex stuff)

    Read the article

  • Is Apple getting out of the general purpose development platform business?

    - by Charles E. Grant
    I've been doing general ANSI C/Console C++/Java/Web development on Mac hardware for about ten years. I make no claims of objective superiority over other platforms, it just satisfies my personal tastes. With the success of the iPhone and the related App store there was some speculation that Apple would get out of the general purpose computer market, and become a closed software ecosystem, focusing on consumer appliances. I pooh-poohed the speculation at the time, but this week Apple announced that a) they were opening an App store for the Mac, b) Java applications would not be eligible for the App store, c) the Apple JVM was being deprecated and might not be available for future releases of OS X. I'm not a Java developer per se, but I work in a research lab that occasionally writes Java applications, and also depends on tools written Java. This has the potential to be a huge pain in the butt for us. As of now, there is no other JVM for OS X that we can point our end users to. Soy Latte and OpenJDK might be appropriate for developers, but the complexity of the installation makes them inappropriate for end users. Eventually I expect Oracle/SUN will produce a replacement JVM for OS X. More worrisome to me is that Apple used to specifically advertise that it was an excellent platform for scientific development, because they supported all major language platforms. Is the deprecation of their JVM a sign that this market no longer interests them?

    Read the article

  • How do I develop database-utilizing application in an agile/test-driven-development way?

    - by user39019
    I want to add databases (traditional client/server RDBMS's like Mysql/Postgresql as opposed to NoSQL, or embedded databases) to my toolbox as a developer. I've been using SQLite for simpler projects with only 1 client, but now I want to do more complicated things (ie, db-backed web development). I usually like following agile and/or test-driven-development principles. I generally code in Perl or Python. Questions: How do I test my code such that each run of the test suite starts with a 'pristine' state? Do I run a separate instance of the database server every test? Do I use a temporary database? How do I design my tables/schema so that it is flexible with respect to changing requirements? Do I start with an ORM for my language? Or do I stick to manually coding SQL? One thing I don't find appealing is having to change more than one thing (say, the CREATE TABLE statement and associated crud statements) for one change, b/c that's error prone. On the other hand, I expect ORM's to be a low slower and harder to debug than raw SQL. What is the general strategy for migrating data between one version of the program and a newer one? Do I carefully write ALTER TABLE statements between each version, or do I dump the data and import fresh in the new version?

    Read the article

  • Une nouvelle API gère le NFC dans App Inventor, le kit de création d'applications Android pour les non-développeurs du MIT

    Une nouvelle API gère le NFC dans App Inventor le kit de création d'applications Android pour les non-développeurs du MIT Une démonstration d'une nouveauté issue d'App Inventor pour la prise en charge du NFC sera effectuée ces jours. App Inventor est un kit académique de développement d'application Android pour les non-développeurs. Le projet avait été développé à la base par le MIT, puis cédé par la suite à Google. Le projet avait ensuite fait les frais de la politique de Google ayant entrainé l'abandon de plusieurs autres projets et était retourné entre les mains du MIT en début 2012. Le...

    Read the article

  • Google devrait-il arrêter le développement de Chrome OS ? La séparation des équipes de Chrome et Android est jugée "stupide"

    Google devrait-il abandonner le développement de Chrome OS ? Un analyste de Bloomberg vient de publier un billet de blog plutôt provocateur. Il y traite Google d'imbécile, du fait de son organisation interne relative au développement de ses deux systèmes d'exploitation. En effet, il faut savoir qu'à Mountain View, une équipe travaille sur Chrome OS, tandis que l'autre s'occupe d'Android. Et ces deux groupes ne collaborent absolument pas, il régnerait même entre eux un fort esprit de compétition, d'après certains salariés de la firme. Pourtant, d'après Brad Stone, Android a largement démontré sa supériorité et sa plus grande popularité que son "concurrent" interne. Il estime donc que le staff ...

    Read the article

  • Is using SVN for development and CM a bad practice?

    - by GatorGuy
    I have a bit of experience with SVN as a pure programmer/developer. Within my company, however, we use SVN as our configuration management tool. I thought using SVN for development at the same time was OK since we could use branches and the trunk for dev, and tags for releases. To me, the tags were the CM part, and the branches/trunk were the dev part. Recently a person, who develops high level code (but outside of the "pure SW" group) mentioned that the existing philosophy (mixing SVN for dev and CM) was wrong... in his opinion. His reasoning is that he thinks the company's CM tool should always link to run-able SW (so branches would break this rule). He also mentioned that a CM tool shouldn't be a backup utility for daily or incremental commits. Finally, he doesn't like the idea of having to jump from revision 143 to 89 in order to get a working copy... and further that CM tools shouldn't allow reversion to a broken state. In general he wants to separate the CM and back-up/dev utilties that SVN offers. Honestly, I am new and the person with this perspective is one of seniority, experience, and success, so I want to field this dilemma with the stackoverflow userbase to see if his approach has merit. My question: Should SVN be purely used for development, and another tool for CM (or vice versa)? Why? If so, what tools would you suggest for this combo? Or do you think that integrating both CM and dev into SVN is the best approach? Why? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • What patterns book for iOS development contains this specific information? [closed]

    - by Brett Ryan
    I've read several books on iOS development and Objective-C, however what a lot of them teach is how to work with interfaces and all contain the model inside the view controller, i.e. a UITableViewController based view will simply have an NSArray as it's model. I'm interested in what the best practices are for designing the structure of an application. Specifically I'm interested in best practices for the following: How to separate a model from the view controller. I think I know how to do this by simply replacing the NSArray style example with a specific model object, however what I do not know how to do is alert the view when the model changes. For example in .NET I would solve this by conforming to INotifyPropertyChanged and databinding, and similarly with Java I would use PropertyChangeListener. How to create a service model for my domain objects. For example I want to learn the best way to create a service for a hypothetical Widget object to manage an internal DB and also services for communicating with remote endpoints. I need to learn the best ways to do this in a way that interface components can subscribe to events such as widgetUpdated. These services should be singleton classes and some how dependency injected into model/controller objects. Books I've read so far are: Programming in Objective-C (4th Edition) Beginning iOS 5 Development: Exploring the iOS SDK The iOS 5 Developer's Cookbook: Expanded Electronic Edition: Essentials and Advanced Recipes for iOS Programmers Learn Objective-C on the Mac: For OS X and iOS I've also purchased the following updated books but not yet read them. The Core iOS 6 Developer's Cookbook (4th edition Programming in Objective-C (5th Edition) I come from a Java and C# background with 15 years experience, I understand that many of the ways I would do things in these languages may not fit to the ObjC way of developing applications. Would someone be able to provide me with the book on this topic containing this specific subject matter?

    Read the article

  • La migration des applications Android/iOS sur Windows Phone bientôt possible ? Un brevet de Microsoft dévoile un service de transition

    La migration des applications Android/iOS sur Windows Phone bientôt possible ? Un brevet de Microsoft dévoile un nouveau service pour faciliter la transition vers son OS Le succès d'une plateforme mobile passe aussi par la qualité et la quantité d'applications disponibles sur sa galerie. Microsoft est conscient de cela, et a déjà développé plusieurs stratégies pour attirer les développeurs mobiles. La firme avait par exemple publié des outils pour aider les développeurs Android et iOS à porter leurs applications existantes sur Windows Phone, et faciliter la transition d'un écosystème vers sa plateforme. Mais la société n'a pas l'intention de s'arrêter là. Selon un dépôt d...

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474  | Next Page >