Search Results

Search found 56516 results on 2261 pages for 'mysql create'.

Page 484/2261 | < Previous Page | 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491  | Next Page >

  • Changing CCK content-types details results in numerous DB calls for the menu system

    - by Paul Strugger
    Every time I make a change in the details of a content-type it takes too long. I though it had to do with the fact that I had too many content-types and fields (~500), but when I load the devel module to see the queries that take that long I see: Executed 32212 queries in 12267.57 milliseconds. Queries taking longer than 5 ms and queries executed more than once, are highlighted. Page execution time was 55763.32 ms When I see the details I notice that the vast majority of db calls come from the menu system, e.g.: _menu_route menu_local_tasks admin_menu_link_save Why is that? Can I avoid some of these? It doesn't seem logical!

    Read the article

  • Best place to create windows form objects

    - by user333484
    I'm creating a windows app in c# 2008 that will have around 8-10 dialog boxes. I want these forms to exist throughout the life of the program. Where's the best place to create and store the objects? I'm coming from Delphi, where Form objects were usually stored in global variables. I'm tempted to do it in the static Program class. Should I put them in the main form instead? Thanks for helping a C# newb out.

    Read the article

  • Preventing SQL injecting in a database class

    - by Josh
    I'm building a database class and thought it'd be a good idea to incorporate some form of SQL injection prevention (duh!). Here's the method that runs a database query: class DB { var $db_host = 'localhost'; var $db_user = 'root'; var $db_passwd = ''; var $db_name = 'whatever'; function query($sql) { $this->result = mysql_query($sql, $this->link); if(!$this->result) { $this->error(mysql_error()); } else { return $this->result; } } } There's more in the class than that but I'm cutting it down just for this. The problem I'm facing is if I just use mysql_real_escape_string($sql, $this->link); then it escapes the entire query and leads to a SQL syntax error. How can I dynamically find the variables that need to be escaped? I want to avoid using mysql_real_escape_string() in my main code blocks, i'd rather have it in a function. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Thumbnailing and then Saving as a Blob with PHP in Wordpress

    - by Parris
    The below code seems like it should work; however, the blob in the database only contains 0 after the function is run. Does the below code look accurate? If not how can I fix it? $tmpName = $_FILES['picture']['tmp_name']; $fp = fopen($tmpName, 'r'); $binary = fread($fp, filesize($tmpName)); fclose($fp); $originalImage = imagecreatefromstring($binary); $tempImage = imagecreate(100,100); imagecopyresized($tempImage,$originalImage,0,0,0,0,100,100); ob_start(); imageJPEG($tempImage); $thumbnail = ob_get_contents(); ob_end_clean(); $wpdb->query("UPDATE ".$wpdb->prefix."items SET picture = $thumbnail WHERE id=$id'"); Thank :)!

    Read the article

  • Select products with users

    - by Ploppe
    I have not worked with SQL for quite a long time, and I need some help for a basic query. I have the three following tables: users (id, name) products (id, name) owners (userid, productid, date) One product can be sold by user A to user B and then back to A. Now, I want the list of all products currently owned by every single user with the date of transaction. Currently, my query is this one, but I'm stuck with old data (first association of one product to one user, and not the newest one): SELECT users.name, products.name, date FROM products JOIN owners ON products.id = owners.id JOIN users ON owners.id = user.id GROUP BY product.id Do you have some hints? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Locking a detail view if a user is editing the item...

    - by BenTheDesigner
    Hi All I am developing a user manager which must control access to the detail view of editable items. At present, when a user clicks 'edit', the application queries the link table to check if a user is currently editing that page, if not, it allows access to the page and then inserts a record into the link table preventing another user from editing the same page at the same time. My question is what would the best way to handle the removal of records if say a user exists the browser without saving etc, therefore no action to remove the record. I have a couple of ideas but would like other input before I decide. BenTheDesigner

    Read the article

  • Selecting count(*) while checking for a value in the results

    - by Rob
    SELECT COUNT(*) as Count, IF(sch.HomeTeamID = 34,true,false) AS Hawaii FROM schedule sch JOIN schools s ON s.ID = 83 WHERE (sch.HomeTeamID = 83 OR sch.AwayTeamID = 83) AND sch.SeasonID = 4 I'm trying to use count() to simplify my result but also include a field that represents wether any of the results' specific column contained a certain value. Is this possible? I'd basically like a row response with all the info I need.

    Read the article

  • update in codeigniter works but displays an error message

    - by Charmie
    i was just wondering what could be the problem with a working code yet displays an error message such as this: A PHP Error was encountered Severity: Notice Message: Array to string conversion Filename: database/DB_active_rec.php Line Number: 1407 im trying to update fields in my database. I have this code and every tutorial are just the same for batch upload. It works anyway but the thing is it display such an error. this what i have in my model: function update2($data){ $this->db->update_batch('users',$data, "id"); } This what i have in my controller: public function updateValues(){ $this->load->model('get_db'); $newRow = array( array( 'id' => '3', 'firstname' => 'Rapphie' ), array( 'id' => '2', 'firstname' => 'Charmie' ) ); $this->get_db->update2($newRow); echo "it has been updated"; } please help.

    Read the article

  • Help optimizing a query with 16 subqueries

    - by Webnet
    I have indexes/primaries on all appropriate ID fields for each type. I'm wondering though how I could make this more efficient. It takes a while to load the page with only 15,000 rows and that'll quickly grow to 500k. The $whereSql variable simply has a few more parameters for the main ebay_archive_listing table. NOTE: This is all done in a single query because I have ASC/DESC sorting for each subquery value. NOTE: I've converted some of the sub queries to INNER JOIN's SELECT product_master.product_id, ( SELECT COUNT(listing_id) FROM ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc '.$listingCountJoin.' WHERE ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.product_id = product_master.product_id) as listing_count, sku, type_id, ( SELECT AVG(ebay_archive_listing.current_price) FROM ebay_archive_listing INNER JOIN ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc ON ( ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.listing_id = ebay_archive_listing.id AND ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.product_id = product_master.product_id ) WHERE '.$whereSql.' AND ebay_archive_listing.current_price > 0 ) as average_bid_price, ( SELECT AVG(ebay_archive_listing.buy_it_now_price) FROM ebay_archive_listing INNER JOIN ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc ON ( ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.listing_id = ebay_archive_listing.id AND ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.product_id = product_master.product_id ) WHERE '.$whereSql.' AND ebay_archive_listing.buy_it_now_price > 0 ) as average_buyout_price, ( SELECT MIN(ebay_archive_listing.current_price) FROM ebay_archive_listing INNER JOIN ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc ON ( ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.listing_id = ebay_archive_listing.id AND ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.product_id = product_master.product_id ) WHERE '.$whereSql.' AND ebay_archive_listing.current_price > 0 ) as lowest_bid_price, ( SELECT MAX(ebay_archive_listing.current_price) FROM ebay_archive_listing INNER JOIN ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc ON ( ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.listing_id = ebay_archive_listing.id AND ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.product_id = product_master.product_id ) WHERE '.$whereSql.' AND ebay_archive_listing.current_price > 0 ) as highest_bid_price, ( SELECT MIN(ebay_archive_listing.buy_it_now_price) FROM ebay_archive_listing INNER JOIN ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc ON ( ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.listing_id = ebay_archive_listing.id AND ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.product_id = product_master.product_id ) WHERE '.$whereSql.' AND ebay_archive_listing.current_price > 0 ) as lowest_buyout_price, ( SELECT MAX(ebay_archive_listing.buy_it_now_price) FROM ebay_archive_listing INNER JOIN ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc ON ( ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.listing_id = ebay_archive_listing.id AND ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.product_id = product_master.product_id ) WHERE '.$whereSql.' AND ebay_archive_listing.current_price > 0 ) as highest_buyout_price, round((( SELECT COUNT(ebay_archive_listing.id) FROM ebay_archive_listing INNER JOIN ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc ON ( ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.listing_id = ebay_archive_listing.id AND ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.product_id = product_master.product_id ) WHERE '.$whereSql.' AND ebay_archive_listing.status_id = 2 ) / ( SELECT COUNT(listing_id) FROM ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc '.$listingCountJoin.' WHERE ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.product_id = product_master.product_id ) * 100), 1) as sold_percent FROM product_master '.$joinSql.' WHERE product_master.product_id IN ( SELECT product_id FROM ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc INNER JOIN ebay_archive_listing ON ( ebay_archive_listing.id = ebay_archive_product_listing_assoc.listing_id AND '.$whereSql.' ) )

    Read the article

  • Does it make sense to replace sub-queries by join?

    - by Roman
    For example I have a query like that. select col1 from t1 where col2>0 and col1 in (select col1 from t2 where col2>0) As far as I understand, I can replace it by the following query: select t1.col1 from t1 join (select col1 from t2 where col2>0) as t2 on t1.col1=t2.col1 where t1.col2>0 ADDED In some answers I see join in other inner join. Are both right? Or they are even identical?

    Read the article

  • Retrieve Specific Data/Value From Database 1 Line PHP

    - by Belgin Fish
    Hi, I'm just wondering how I can retrieve a specific value (only 1 thing will be returned) from a database using php. My query is mysql_query("SELECT balance FROM users WHERE username = '". $this->username . "'") I'm just looking for it to retrieve the data from that row so I can save it directory into a variable.

    Read the article

  • Joining two mysql_fetch_arrays

    - by John Harbert
    I am trying to piece two queries together. Below is the code Im using. However the table is splitting up the data. How can I remedy this? Or what better solutions are there? while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)) { echo "<tr id='centered' >"; echo "<td class='leftalign'>" . $row['Quarter_Name'] . "</td>"; echo "<td>" . $row['Quarterly_yield'] . "</td>"; echo "<td>" . $row['Quarterly_yield'] . "</td>"; echo "<td>" . $row['Quarterly_yield'] . "</td>"; } while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result8)) { echo "<td>" . $row['Quarterly_yield'] . "</td>"; }

    Read the article

  • Persisting Serializable Objects in Hibernate

    - by VeeArr
    I am attempting to persist objects that contain some large Serializable types. I want Hibernate to automatically generate my DDL (using Hibernate annotations). For the most part, this works, but the default database column type used by Hibernate when persisting these types is tinyblob. Unfortunately, this causes crashes when attempting to persist my class, because these types will not fit within the length of tinyblob. However, if I manually set the type (using @Column(columnDefinition="longblob")), it works fine. Is there any way to make the default binary type longblob instead of tinyblob, so that I don't need to manually specify the @Column annotation on each field?

    Read the article

  • LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE custom value

    - by NR03
    How to add a custom value using LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE? The column time_added is the 7th column and the file has only 2 values for the first and the second column. For the 7th column, time_added I want to use the unix timestamp when loading from file. This code isn't working: $result = mysql_query("LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE '{$myFile}' INTO TABLE {$table} FIELDS TERMINATED BY ':' LINES TERMINATED BY '\n' SET `time_added`=unix_timestamp()");

    Read the article

  • adding count( ) column on each row

    - by Arsenal
    I'm not sure if this is even a good question or not. I have a complex query with lot's of unions that searches multiple tables for a certain keyword (user input). All tables in which there is searched are related to the table book. There is paging on the resultset using LIMIT, so there's always a maximum of 10 results that get withdrawn. I want an extra column in the resultset displaying the total amount of results found however. I do not want to do this using a seperate query. Is it possible to add a count() column to the resultset that counts every result found? the output would look like this: ID Title Author Count(...) 1 book_1 auth_1 23 2 book_2 auth_2 23 4 book_4 auth_.. 23 ... Thanks!

    Read the article

  • limiting a query to a specific item

    - by Dev-Ria
    I have a db with thousands of domains and data. I want to list only 100 rows of each domain. i can't use LIMIT 100 cause that only limits 100 records but I want dom1 to list 100 dom2 to list 100 dom3 to list 100 all in one query. This is what I have so far. SELECT domain COUNT(Key) AS DomCount FROM table_domain GROUP BY user,location ORDER BY domain,DomCount DESC Could I use a CASE?

    Read the article

  • advice on how to create dynamic controls

    - by user554134
    Hi, My web page will get a set of results from the database and display it to the user. However I am not sure about "number" of results. Each result will have a panel which contains several controls in itself, an image, several labels, etc. What is the best way to do this dynamically, eg. create these controls dynamically? Is it better to use an AJAX control? Should I use Gridview? Thanks for the help, Behrouz

    Read the article

  • connection textfield and html table with database

    - by klox
    dear all..i have a textfield <tr> <td> <td><input type="text" id="mod"></td> </td> </tr> and a cell <tr> <td><div id="value">//i want data show here</div> </td> </tr> beside that, i've a table "settingdata" in database it consist of 2 field:itemdata and remark.. itemdata's value are "UD" and remark's value are "FM=87.5-108.0MHZ"... what must i do if i want after type "0103UD" at textfield inside <div id="value"></div> can show "FM=87.5-108.0mhz"...

    Read the article

  • Executing multiple update statements in PHP

    - by theband
    I have three update statements to be executed in PHP, i am getting the values of all these as return parameters. How to execute each statement independely and finally show the end user the result that it has been successfully updated. <?php public function name($parameter1,$parameter2.... $parametern) { $records=array(); $sql=""; $sql2=""; $sql3=""; $result=mysql_query($sql); //return $result; if(!$result){throw new Exception(mysql_error());} if(mysql_num_rows($result)==0){return $records;} while($row=mysql_fetch_assoc($result)){$records[]=$row;} return $records; } ?> Then how finally we can get the result in my row object.

    Read the article

  • Sphinx without using an auto_increment id

    - by squeeks
    I am current in planning on creating a big database (2+ million rows) with a variety of data from separate sources. I would like to avoid structuring the database around auto_increment ids to help prevent against sync issues with replication, and also because each item inserted will have a alphanumeric product code that is guaranteed to be unique - it seems to me more sense to use that instead. I am looking at a search engine to index this database with Sphinx looking rather appealing due to its design around indexing relational databases. However, looking at various tutorials and documentation seems to show database designs being dependent on an auto_increment field in one form or another and a rather bold statement in the documentation saying that document ids must be 32/64bit integers only or things break. Is there a way to have a database indexed by Sphinx without auto_increment fields as the id?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491  | Next Page >