Search Results

Search found 34305 results on 1373 pages for 'self referencing table'.

Page 490/1373 | < Previous Page | 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497  | Next Page >

• need to find differences between 2 identical sql tables

  - by balalakshmi

  I need to find differences between 2 identical sql tables Each table is being uploaded from a 3rd paty tool into sqlserver database. The table structure is: Issue ID-status-Who Issue ID will not repeated within a table, though its not defined explicitly as primary Key There could be additions/deletions/Updations between any 2 tables. What I need Number of rows added & their details Number of rows deleted & their details Number of rows deleted & their details How do I do this 1) is it better to use sql 2) or use datatables

  Read the article

• jQuery - add onclick to TR

  - by Guus

  I use Richfaces and one of the rich:dataTable generates this html: <form id="scheduleForm"> <table id="scheduleForm:rowList"> <tr> <td></td> </tr> </table> </form> I want to act on a click on a TR for this table. How can I do this? The following also works for other tables on the page and I get the alert() for the other rows as well, and I don't want that. jQuery('#scheduleForm:rowList tr').click(function(event) { alert(1); });

  Read the article

• find users that are following other users

  - by Jakob

  Hi I'm wondering how I can go about this problem I have a DB with a Users Table, and a Followers table. The Followers table contains 2 Columns "FollowerID" and "FollowedID" I have a 1 - * relation in my datamodel between Users.ID -> Followers.FollowerID and Users.ID -> FollowedID How do I in LINQ get a set of users that are following a specific user? I'll express what I'm trying to achieve programatically I can get this far: ctx.Followers.Where(f => f.FollowedID == CurrentUser.ID) so now i have a Followers set where I have the ID of the users that follow the CurrentUser, and I could iterate through this collection and then add users after each iteration to a collection that would be a total USER collection that followed CurrentUser, but isn't there a smarter, or LINQ'er way to do this? Much appreciated Thx

  Read the article

• OneToMany association updates instead of insert

  - by Shvalb

  I have an entity with one-to-many association to child entity. The child entity has 2 columns as PK and one of the column is FK to the parent table. mapping looks like this: @OneToMany(cascade = {CascadeType.ALL}, fetch = FetchType.EAGER ) @JoinColumn(name="USER_RESULT_SEQUENCES.USER_RESULT_ID", referencedColumnName="USER_RESULT_ID", unique=true, insertable=true, updatable=false) private List<UserResultSequence> sequences; I create an instance of parent and add children instances to list and then try to save it to DB. If child table is empty it inserts all children and it works perfectly. if the child table is not empty it updates existing rows! I don't know why it updates instead of inserts, any ideas why this might happen?? Thank you!

  Read the article

• Group by clause return latest row information

  - by I Like PHP

  below is my table structure table_movie_info i_movie_id |movie_actor_id |movie_actress_id |movie_director_id | movie_producer_id 48 | 5 | 9 | 66 | 21 48 | 6 | 15 | 88 | 22 48 | 7 | 12 | 77 | 23 one more table is table_movie movie_id | movie_year | movie_genre_id |movie_rating 1 | 2009 | 6 | 8 2 | 2001 | 5 | 7.5 48 | 2007 | 3 | 6.8 now i need total movie information using both table,i write below query SELECT * FROM table_movie_info LEFT JOIN table_movie ON movie_id = i_movie_id WHERE i_movie_id=48 GROUP BY i_movie_id above query return only one row , but i need such type of information movie_id=48, actors_id list=5,6,7 acttress_id list=9,15,12 etc.. please tell me the optimized query which h return complete information i need. thanks for helping me always.

  Read the article

• Linq to Entities (EF): How to get the value of a FK without doing the join

  - by Chu

  I'm using the Linq to Entities. I've got my main table, Employee setup with a field named vendorID. Vendor ID is a foreign key into the Vendors table. As it is right now, the Employee object does not directly expose the vendorID. Instead, I can only access it this way: var employee = (from e in context.Employees.Include("tbl_vendors") where e.employeeID = 1 select e).FirstOrDefault(); //this gets the vendor ID int vendorID = employee.tbl_vendors.vendorID; That is just fine and dandy, but it is extra work on the database because it is forcing a join where none is needed. Is there a way to get that key value without being forced to do a join to the tbl_vendors table?

  Read the article

• SQL JOIN with two or more tables as output - most efficient way?

  - by littlegreen

  I have an SQL query that executes a LEFT JOIN on another table, then outputs all results that could be coupled into a designated table. I then have a second SQL query that executes the LEFT JOIN again, then outputs the results that could not be coupled to a designated table. In code, this is something like: INSERT INTO coupledrecords SELECT b.col1, b.col2... s.col1, s.col2... FROM bigtable AS b LEFT JOIN smallertable AS s ON criterium WHERE s.col1 IS NOT NULL INSERT INTO notcoupledrecords SELECT b.col1, b.col2... bigtable AS b LEFT JOIN smallertable AS s ON criterium WHERE s.col1 IS NULL My question: I now have to execute the JOIN two times, in order to achieve what I want. I have a feeling that this is twice as slow as it could be. Is this true, and if yes, is there a way to do it more efficiently?

  Read the article

• Linq Order By a subtable

  - by Michael

  Hello, My question is how to sort a Linq query by a sub table: Table Apps: - app_id - name Table AppStatus: - app_status_id - app_id - severity - status_date I would like to have a query with all the apps, sorted by the last status severity: app_id name 1 first 2 second 3 third app_status_id app_id severity status_date 1 1 5 12-4-2010 2 1 2 15-4-2010 3 2 7 10-4-2010 4 3 3 13-4-2010 Now i want it sorted like: app_id name 3 third 1 first 2 second Can anyone help me with a LINQ query for this. I tried the following already, but that didn't work: var apps = from apps in dc.Apps orderby apps.AppStatus.LastOrDefault().severity select apps;

  Read the article

• vb.net checkboxes. Need to populate from database and also help in designing

  - by redr

  i have this requirement and since im new to vb.net dont really have much of idea how to do this. I have 20 checkboxes with dropdowns and textbox with it. the example is - table tr td checkbox -- textbox -- dropdownlist /td /tr tr td chk1 txtbox1 ddl1 /td /tr tr td chk2 txtbox2 ddl2 /td /tr and so on. the above structure shall be in one row of a table. does anyone know how to design this in code recursive and also how to take the checkbox data from here and send it to db table for records insert, update and select. thanks

  Read the article

• differentiating results of sql right join

  - by Sourabh

  Hi I have a below SQL query SELECT `User`.`username` , Permalink.perma_link_id, Permalink.locale, Permalink.title, DATEDIFF( CURDATE( ) , Permalink.created ) AS dtdiff, `TargetSegment`.segment_text, TargetSegment.source_segment_id ,TargetSegment.perma_link_id ,TargetSegment.created ,TargetSegment.updated, DATEDIFF( CURDATE( ) , TargetSegment.updated ) AS datediff FROM `users` AS `User` RIGHT JOIN perma_links AS `PermaLink` ON ( `PermaLink`.`username` = `User`.`username` ) RIGHT JOIN target_segments AS `TargetSegment` ON ( `TargetSegment`.`username` = `User`.`username` ) RIGHT JOIN source_segments AS `SourceSegment` ON ( `SourceSegment`.`source_detail_id` = `PermaLink`.`source_detail_id` ) LEFT JOIN source_details AS `SourceDetail` ON ( `SourceSegment`.`source_detail_id` = `SourceDetail`.`id` ) WHERE `TargetSegment`.`username` = "xxxx" AND `TargetSegment`.`segment_text` <> "" AND `Permalink`.`perma_link_id` = `TargetSegment`.`perma_link_id` AND `TargetSegment`.`source_segment_id` = `SourceSegment`.`id` AND `Permalink`.`source_detail_id` = `SourceDetail`.`id` ORDER BY `TargetSegment`.`updated` DESC LIMIT 0 , 10 This SQL is fetching correct results for me.I want to identify from which table each row if from , to be specific which result is due to PermaLink table and which is from TargetSegment table. is this achievable ?

  Read the article

• Dynamic access to tables from another database inside an user function

  - by Alberto Martinez

  I have an user defined table function in SQL Server that aggregate data from several tables including a couple of tables of another database. That is done hardcoding the name of the database in the queries, but we want to make the database name configurable (because our databases usually share the server with the databases of other applications). I tried to construct a dynamic query string inside the function using the database name that is stored in a configuration table, but: When I tried exec(@sqlStatement) SQL Server said that execute string is not allowed inside a function. Then I tried exec sp_executesql @sqlStatement and the function was created, but when you execute it SQL Server says that inside a function you can only run extended functions and procedures. So the question is: is possible create a function or stored procedure that access a table in another database without having to recreate the function when the database name is different? TIA.

  Read the article

• updating only date part from datetime in sql server 2000

  - by user294146

  hi Experts, I have data in the table like the following. col1 col2 col3 -------------------------------------------------------- 6/5/2010 18:05:00 6/2/2010 10:05:00 Null 6/8/2010 15:05:00 6/3/2010 10:45:00 6/5/2010 11:05:00 6/3/2010 15:05:00 Null 6/7/2010 12:05:00 6/1/2010 15:05:00 6/3/2010 10:45:00 6/1/2010 14:05:00 what my requirement is I want to update the date of there columns with single date without disturbing the time. say for example I want to update the table data with 6/1/2010 where the field data is not null. please let me know the query for updating the table data. thanks & regards, murali

  Read the article

• LINQ to SQL, how to write a method which checks if a row exists when we have multiple tables

  - by Beles

  Hi, I'm trying to write a method in C# which can take as parameter a tabletype, column and a columnvalue and check if the got a row with a with value the method looks like: public object GetRecordFromDatabase(Type tabletype, string columnname, string columnvalue) I'm using LINQ to SQL and need to to this in a generic way so I don't need to write each table I got in the DB. I have been doing this so far for each table, but with more than 70 of these it becomes cumbersome and boring to do. Is there a way to generate the following code dynamically, And swap out the hardcoded tablenames with the values from the parameterlist? In this example I have a table in the DB named tbl_nation, which the DataContext pluralizes to tbl_nations, and I'm checking the column for the value if (DB.tbl_nations.Count(c => c.code.Equals(columnvalue)) == 1) { return DB.tbl_nations.Single(c => c.code.Equals(columnvalue)); }

  Read the article

• Count number of results in a View

  - by Jukebox

  I need to count how many people belong in pre-defined groups (this is easy to do in SQL using the SELECT COUNT statement). My Views query runs fine and displays the actual data in my table, but I simply need to know how many results it found. However there doesn't seem to be a COUNT option in views. I am guessing I am going to have to use some sort of views hook, and then stick the result in the table. Here's a quick example of what i'm trying to achieve: My Table ---------------------- Group A | 20 people Group B | 63 people and so on. (I've tried using the Views_Calc module, but I get errors because it is not quite stable yet.) Anybody know of an easy way to count results in Views?

  Read the article

• optimizing oracle query

  - by deming

  I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around this query. it is taking almost 200+ seconds to execute. I've pasted the execution plan as well. SELECT user_id , ROLE_ID , effective_from_date , effective_to_date , participant_code , ACTIVE FROM CMP_USER_ROLE E WHERE ACTIVE = 0 AND (SYSDATE BETWEEN effective_from_date AND effective_to_date OR TO_CHAR(effective_to_date,'YYYY-Q') = '2010-2') AND participant_code = 'NY005' AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM CMP_USER_ROLE r WHERE r.USER_ID= E.USER_ID AND r.role_id = E.role_id AND r.ACTIVE = 4 AND E.effective_to_date <= (SELECT MAX(last_update_date) FROM CMP_USER_ROLE S WHERE S.role_id = r.role_id AND S.role_id = r.role_id AND S.ACTIVE = 4 )) Explain plan ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 37 | 154 (2)| 00:00:02 | |* 1 | FILTER | | | | | | |* 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | USER_ROLE | 1 | 37 | 30 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | N_USER_ROLE_IDX6 | 27 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 4 | FILTER | | | | | | | 5 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 47 | 124 (2)| 00:00:02 | |* 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | USER_ROLE | 159 | 3339 | 119 (1)| 00:00:02 | | 7 | NESTED LOOPS | | 11 | 517 | 123 (1)| 00:00:02 | |* 8 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| USER_ROLE | 1 | 26 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 9 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | N_USER_ROLE_IDX5 | 1 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 10 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | N_USER_ROLE_IDX2 | 957 | | 74 (2)| 00:00:01 | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Read the article

• How to modify CSS when requirements change?

  - by DaveDev

  Suppose I'm given the requiremnt to geneate a few pages that have tables on them. The original requirement is for all tables to be 500px. I'd write my CSS as follows: table { width: 500px; } That will apply accross the board for all tables. Now, what if they change the requirment so that some tables are 600px. What's the best way to modify the CSS? Should I give the tables classes so table.SizeOne { width: 500px; } table.SizeTwo { width: 600px; } Or is there a better way for me to deal with changes like this?

  Read the article

• my DetailViewController has text field. It appears empty at my first tap after that ...

  - by ahmet732

  I have a table view which has full of items getting from my database. I open my app. I tap one of my items in table view, then DetailViewController that has only text field does not display anything it is empty. But when I go back to table view then tap any other item again , at this time it displays value what I wanted to display.. It does it for my only first tap.. I have no errors and warnings.. What am i missing?

  Read the article

• MySQL: Matching inexact values using "ON"

  - by Brad

  I'm way out of my league here... I have a mapping table (table1) to assign particular values (value) to a whole number (map_nu). My second table (table2), is a collection of averages (avg) (I couldn't figure out how to properly make a markdown table, please feel free to edit!) table1: table2: (value)(Map_nu) (avg) ---- ----- 1 1 1.111 1.045 2 1.2 1.09 3 1.33333 1.135 4 1 1.18 5 1.389 1.225 6 1.42 1.27 7 1.07 1.315 8 1.36 9 1.405 10 I need to find a way to match the averages from table2 to the closest value in table1. It only need to match to the 2 digit past the decimal, so I've added the Truncated function SELECT map_nu FROM `table1` JOIN table2 ON TRUNCATE(table1.value,2)=TRUNCATE(table2.avg,2) I still miss the values that don't match the averages exactly. Is there a way to pick the nearest truncated value? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Execute query stored in variable in a very specific way

  - by niao

  Greetings, I have a problem as follows: I have an SQL variable declared: DECLARE @myVariable nvarchar(max) a third party library set a value for this variable. To simplify, lets say that the value is as follows: SET @myVariable = 'Select ROWGUID from MySampleTable' Now, I want to execute the following query: SELECT ROWGUID FROM myTable WHERE ROWGUID in (exec sp_executesql @myVariable ) However, the above statement does not work because it returns an error telling me that I can't execute stored procedure in that way. I made a workaround and this is what I wrote: create table #temptable (ID uniqueidentifier null) if(@myVariable is not null AND @myVariable !='') insert into #temptable exec sp_executesql @myVariable SELECT ROWGUID FROM myTable WHERE ROWGUID in (select * from #temptable) DROP TABLE #temptable This works fine.However I don't think it is a good idea to use temporary table. How can I achieve the same result without necessity of creating temporary tables? I am using SQL SERVER 2005

  Read the article

• Beginners PHP / mySQL question

  - by Reg H

  I'm brand new to PHP & MySQL, and one function I'm creating needs to access a large table or database. I've created the database and it's currently in a MySQL table, which I'm accessing with no problem. The table is 11,000 rows in length, with 8 columns (all text less than 8 characters long) - it's static, and will never change. Without getting too particular, my users will hit a button which will trigger scripts to access the data, say 500 times or more. So in general would it be better practice to include all of this data in a big 'switch' or 'if... then' conditional right in my scripts, rather than opening and accessing the database connection hundreds, or maybe even thousands of times? It just seems like that might be a bottleneck waiting to happen. Thanks!

  Read the article

• SQL Server 2008 database timeout after delete

  - by stephenbayer

  I'm running the following statement, it is working locally with SQL Server 2008, however, there is SQL Server 2008 Express on the development server, and after the sql statement runs, I am unable to do SELECT statements on the table in which I deleted the record. Both databases were created with the same table creation scripts. "DELETE FROM [dbo].[tblMiddayMover] WITH (ROWLOCK) WHERE [idMiddayMover] = @IdMiddayMover" What reasons would this statement ever cause the database to hang. After executing that statement, the following SELECT statement causes an error. "SELECT * FROM [dbo].[tblMiddayMover] WHERE [fldActive] = 1" I get the following error: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding. I can do select statements on any other table with no issues.

  Read the article

• LINQ to Entites: Doing a count over one-to-many relationships

  - by chris

  I have a couple of tables where there are one to many relationships. Let's say I have a Country table, a State table with a FK to Country, and a City table with a FK to State. I'd like to be able to create a count of all Cities for a given country, and also a count of cities based on a filter - something like: foreach( var country in Model.Country ) { total = country.State.All().City.All().Count() ; filtered = country.State.All().City.Any(c=>c.field == value).Count(); } Obviously, this doesn't work - is there any way to do this?

  Read the article

• Optimal search queries

  - by Macros

  Following on from my last question http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2788082/sql-server-query-performance, and discovering that my method of allowing optional parameters in a search query is sub optimal, does anyone have guidelines on how to approach this? For example, say I have an application table, a customer table and a contact details table, and I want to create an SP which allows searching on some, none or all of surname, homephone, mobile and app ID, I may use something like the following: select * from application a inner join customer c on a.customerid = a.id left join contact hp on (c.id = hp.customerid and hp.contacttype = 'homephone') left join contact mob on (c.id = mob.customerid and mob.contacttype = 'mobile') where (a.ID = @ID or @ID is null) and (c.Surname = @Surname or @Surname is null) and (HP.phonenumber = @Homphone or @Homephone is null) and (MOB.phonenumber = @Mobile or @Mobile is null) The schema used above isn't real, and I wouldn't be using select * in a real world scenario, it is the construction of the where clause I am interested in. Is there a better approach, either dynamic sql or an alternative which can achieve the same result, without the need for many nested conditionals. Some SPs may have 10 - 15 criteria used in this way

  Read the article

• i need to do a view in sql that returns the latest invoice date for each company

  - by dave haughton

  hi, i have a company table that is dbo.companies and has companyId as a column. I also have an invoice table that is dbo.invoices with invoicecompanyId column (which is the same as the companyId on the other table) and it also has a column called invoicedate. What i am mtrying to achieve is a view of each companyid with the corresponding latest invoice date for all the companies i have. i have done the following but i dont know how to filter for the latest invoice, it returns all invoices from all companies and i need latest invoice for all companies SELECT TOP (100) PERCENT 'A' + SUBSTRING('000000', 1, 6 - LEN(CAST(dbo.companies.companyId AS varchar(10)))) + CAST(dbo.companies.companyId AS varchar(10)) AS Client_ID, dbo.invoices.invoiceDate AS S_Inv_Date FROM dbo.invoices INNER JOIN dbo.companies ON dbo.invoices.invoiceCompanyId = dbo.companies.companyId ORDER BY Client_ID can you help please ta

  Read the article

• How can I figure out where all these extra sqlite3 selects are being generated in my rails app?

  - by radixhound

  I'm trying to figure out where a whole pile of extra queries are being generated by my rails app. I need some ideas on how to tackle it. Or, if someone can give me some hints, I'd be grateful. I get these: SQL (1.0ms) SELECT name FROM sqlite_master WHERE type = 'table' AND NOT name = 'sqlite_sequence' SQL (0.8ms) SELECT name FROM sqlite_master WHERE type = 'table' AND NOT name = 'sqlite_sequence' SQL (0.8ms) SELECT name FROM sqlite_master WHERE type = 'table' AND NOT name = 'sqlite_sequence' repeated over and over on every request to the DB (as much as 70 times for a single request) I tried installing a plugin that traced the source of the queries, but it really didn't help at all. I'm using the hobofields gem, dunno if that is what's doing it but I'm somewhat wedded to it at the moment Any tips on hunting down the source of these extra queries?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497  | Next Page >