Search Results

Search found 52744 results on 2110 pages for 'net ( net2 0)'.

Page 494/2110 | < Previous Page | 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501  | Next Page >

  • 2 basic but interesting questions about .NET

    - by b-gen-jack-o-neill
    Hi, when I first saw C#, I thought this must be some joke. I was starting with programming in C. But in C# you could just drag and drop objects, and just write event code to them. It was so simple. Now, I still like C the most, becouse I am very attracted to the basic low level operations, and C is just next level of assembler, with few basic routines, so I like it very much. Even more becouse I write little apps for microcontrollers. But yeasterday I wrote very simple control program for my microcontroller based LED cube in asm, and I needed some way to simply create animation sequences to the Cube. So, I remembered C#. I have practically NO C# skills, but still I created simple program to make animation sequences in about hour with GUI, just with help of google and help of the embeded function descriptions in C#. So, to get to the point, is there some other reason then top speed, to use any other language than C#? I mean, it is so effective. I know that Java is a bit of similiar, but I expect C# to be more Windows effective since its directly from Microsoft. The second question is, what is the advantage of compiling into CIL, and than run by CLR, than directly compile it into machine code? I know that portability is one, but since C# is mainly for Windows, wouldn´t it be more powerfull to just compile it directly? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • asp.net dropdownlist databind on init causes data loss

    - by user2191496
    On which event or how should I bind data to the dropdownlist to avoid selected value overridden? For some reasons, I can't use "IsPostBack" to bind data only on postback I've tried binding data on page init, it works ok but when postback, the selected value will be overridden (Loss) protected void Page_Init(object sender, EventArgs e) { this.BindData(); } protected void BindData() { //grab the source of dropdownlist }

    Read the article

  • asp.net mvc Records Based On other

    - by mazhar kaunain baig
    I want to create a listing view in which the record will be in this format(basically one record based on other, what approach i should follow) . My table Module1 Module1Feature Module1Feaure2 Module1Feature3 Module2 Module2Feature Module2Feature2 Module2Feature3 Basically Please Notice that the child records are based on the parent.

    Read the article

  • Update query (access & vb.net)

    - by yae
    Hi: I have to update some fields of a table of access according to the value of parameter. If this paramter is "true" I need to update. Table idInvoice price percentageTax1 tax1 percentageTax2 tax2 total Example values: idinvoice: 12300 price: 100 € percentageTax1: 10 % tax1= 10€ percentageTax2: 5 % tax2: 5€ total: 115 € (result: 100€+10€+5€) Ok. If the parameter on that I have commented before is "true" I must update the percentages and then update the total. I need to replace the "old" percentages by new percent. Ok I can do it in 3 queries: update invocies set percentageTax1=20,tax1=price *(percentageTax1/100) where idInvoice=@number and percentageTax1=10 update invocies set percentageTax2=7,tax2=price *(percentageTax2/100) where idInvoice=@number and percentageTax2=5 update invocies set total=price+tax1+tax2 where idInvoice=@number . But my question is: is there any an alternative to do this in 1 query?

    Read the article

  • Capturing the Console Output in .NET (C#)

    - by Gripsoft
    Hi i want to invoke the Console application from my application but i would like to capture all the output generated in the console. (Remember, i dont want to save the information first in a file and then relist as i would love to receive it as live)

    Read the article

  • Be notified of method calls in .NET

    - by Alex
    Basically, what I want to do is to be notified whenever a specific method has been called. I was hoping I could accomplish this using Reflection, but my attempts haven't gotten me anywhere yet, so I'm hoping that perhaps somebody else with the same need has accomplished this before and can enlighten me. I figured using MethodInfo was the way to go, but like I said, I found nothing there that could help me accomplish what I wanted to do. Any suggestions, hints or solutions would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Generic SQL builder .NET

    - by Patrick
    I'm looking for a way to write an SQL statement in C# targeting different providers. A typical example of SQL statements differentiating is the LIMIT in PostgreSQL vs. TOP in MSSQL. Is the only way to solve SQL-syntax like the two above to write if-statements depending on which provider the user selects or using try catch statements as flow control (LIMIT didn't work, I'll try TOP instead)? I've seen the LINQ Take method, but I'm wondering if one can do this without LINQ? In other words, does C# have some generic SQL Provider class that I have failed to find that can be used?

    Read the article

  • asp.net mvc postback

    - by user266909
    I have a controller with the following two Edit methods. The edit form displays correctly with all additional dropdown lists from the FormViewModel. However, when I changed some field values and submitted the form. None of the changed fields were saved. The fields in the postbask collection have default or null values. I have another edit form which update another table. On submit, the changed values are saved. Does anyone know why? // GET: /Transfers/Edit/5 public ActionResult Edit(int id) { Transfer transfer = myRepository.GetTransfer(id); if (transfer == null) return View("NotFound"); return View(new TransferFormViewModel(transfer)); } // // POST: /Transfers/Edit/5 [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] public ActionResult Edit(int id, Transfer collection) { Transfer transfer = vetsRepository.GetTransfer(id); if (transfer == null) return View("NotFound"); else { try { UpdateModel(transfer); vetsRepository.Save(); return RedirectToAction("Details", new { id = transfer.TransfersID }); } catch { ModelState.AddModelErrors(transfer.GetRuleViolations()); return View(new TransferFormViewModel(transfer)); } } }

    Read the article

  • Asp.net with MVC multiple model in one view (create, update)

    - by Abdalmohaymen
    I have problem in asp.ne Mvc with multiple model in one view on create and update I 'm work on exams system class Questions and class Answers Question is aparent class and Answers is a child class [Bind(exclude("id"))] class Quesions { public string question{get; set;} public Datetime Timepostquestion{get; set;} } [Bind(exclude("id"))] class Answers { public string answer{get; set;} public Datetime Timepostanswer{get; set;} public questionId {get; set;} } in a view I use two classes how to use classes in insert and update what a way which I have to solve my problem

    Read the article

  • Adding link to a label ASP.NET (VB)

    - by AZIRAR
    Hello, I have a label and I want to add to it a link. I want to use javascript like : MyLabel.Attributes.Add("`onclick`", "javascript:`SOME_CODE`") What must I add in (SOME_CODE) to redirect the user to another link. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • .NET DB Query Without Allocations?

    - by Michael Covelli
    I have been given the task of re-writing some libraries written in C# so that there are no allocations once startup is completed. I just got to one project that does some DB queries over an OdbcConnection every 30 seconds. I've always just used .ExecuteReader() which creates an OdbcDataReader. Is there any pattern (like the SocketAsyncEventArgs socket pattern) that lets you re-use your own OdbcDataReader? Or some other clever way to avoid allocations? I haven't bothered to learn LINQ since all the dbs at work are Oracle based and the last I checked, there was no official Linq To Oracle provider. But if there's a way to do this in Linq, I could use one of the third-party ones.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501  | Next Page >