Search Results

Search found 24406 results on 977 pages for 'javascript namespaces'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 495/977 | < Previous Page | 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502  | Next Page >

  • Jquery each loop with json array

    - by Ben
    I'm trying to use Jquery's each loop to go through this Json and add it to a div named #contentHere. The Json is as follows: { "justIn": [ { "textId": "123", "text": "Hello", "textType": "Greeting" }, { "textId": "514", "text":"What's up?", "textType": "Question" }, { "textId": "122", "text":"Come over here", "textType": "Order" } ], "recent": [ { "textId": "1255", "text": "Hello", "textType": "Greeting" }, { "textId": "6564", "text":"What's up?", "textType": "Question" }, { "textId": "0192", "text":"Come over here", "textType": "Order" } ], "old": [ { "textId": "5213", "text": "Hello", "textType": "Greeting" }, { "textId": "9758", "text":"What's up?", "textType": "Question" }, { "textId": "7655", "text":"Come over here", "textType": "Order" } ] } I'm getting this Json through use of this code: $.get("data.php", function(data){ }) Any solutions?

    Read the article

  • crunching multiple js files during development

    - by Yaron Naveh
    I'm writing a backbone.js app. I have multiple js, css and html template files. I also have a script to crunch them into a single file so it is faster to download. How should I work during development: Add a listener to the file system and after every change compile the files so I can see it in a browser. This implies a 1-2 seconds overhead before I can see what I did, which is annoying for html fine-tuning. Somehow browse using the multiple files during development and only crunch before going to production. This means I need to have a separate index.html for dev and prod. What's your take?

    Read the article

  • Troubles with list "dropdowns" and which list item gets the dropdown

    - by Andrew
    I'm working on a project for an MMO "guild" that gives members of the guild randomly generated tasks for the game. They can "block" three tasks from being assigned. The lists will look something like this: <ul> <li class="blocked">Task that is blocked</li> <li class="blocked-open">Click to block a task</li> <li class="blocked-open">Click to block a task</li> </ul> The blocked-open class means they haven't chosen a task to block yet. The blocked task means they've already blocked a task. When they click the list item, I want this to appear: <ul class="tasks-dropdown no-display"> <li><h1>Click a Task to Block</h1></li> <ul class="task-dropdown-inner"> <?php //output all tasks foreach($tasks as $task) { echo '<li class="blocked-option"><span id="'.$task.'">'.$task.'</span></li>'; } ?> <br class="clear" /> </ul> </ul> I don't quite know how, when the user clicks the .blocked-open line-item, to show that dropdown under only the one they clicked. My jQuery looked like this before I became confused. $("li.blocked-open").click(function() { $("ul.no-display").slideToggle("900"); }); $(".blocked-option span").click(function() { var task = $(this).attr('id'); alert("You have blocked: " + task); location.reload(true); }); I tested it by putting the dropdown under a line item in the code, and it worked fine, but when I have more than one dropdown in the code, clicking on one line item toggles all the dropdowns. I'm not sure what to do. :-p.

    Read the article

  • Adding value to an Input field on click

    - by Wazdesign
    I have this structure on form, <input type="test" value="" id="username" /> <span class="input-value">John Smith</span> <a href="#" class="fill-input">Fill Input</a> when user click on the Fill Input , the data from span which has class input-value will be added to value, after clicking a tag the code should be look like this, <input type="test" value="john Smith" id="username" /> <span class="input-value">John Smith</span> <a href="#" class="fill-input">Fill Input</a> there are many forms element/input on the single page.

    Read the article

  • Problem with jquery-droppable in Chrome

    - by ripper234
    I have a simple application that users jquery-ui's draggable and droppable. In Firefox, it works perfectly. In Chrome, however, I'm having problems. This is the code: $(".cell").droppable({ drop: function(event, ui) { var originalTarget = event.originalTarget; ... } }); In Chrome the 'event' object is of type 'Object' (using Chrome Dev Kit), and event.originalTarget is 'undefined'. What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Get Value from thick box control

    - by Muhammad Akhtar
    I have hidden field on thick box, when I close thick I need to get the value of my hidden field, when close thick box this method calls function tb_remove(parent_func_callback) { parent.document.getElementById('hdf').value// I need value of hidden field here please tell me how can I get hidden field value that is on thick box? Thanks

    Read the article

  • making certain cells of an ExtJS GridPanel un-editable

    - by synchronicity
    I currently have a GridPanel with the Ext.ux.RowEditor plugin. Four fields exist in the row editor: port, ip address, subnet and DHCP. If the DHCP field (checkbox) of the selected row is checked, I need to make the other three fields un-editable. I've been trying to perform this code when the beforeedit event is triggered, but to no avail... I've only found ways to make the entire column un-editable. My code so far: this.rowEditor.on({ scope: this, beforeedit: this.checkIfEditable }); checkIfEditable:function(rowEditor, rowIndex) { if(this.getStore().getAt(rowIndex).get('dhcp')) { // this function makes the entire column un-editable: this.getColumnModel().setEditable(2, false); // I want to make only the other three fields of the current row // uneditable. } } Please let me know if any clarification is needed. Any help potentially extending RowEditor to accomplish the target functionality would be greatly appreciated as well!

    Read the article

  • Append <ul> and <li> in recursive loop

    - by Batman
    I have a site collection. I was told I need a recursive loop to do this. This is what I've tried: When the site loads, call getSiteTree() which passes the top level website to my getSubSite() function. From there I check if there are any subsites. I have a boolean but I'm not really using it for anything yet, I've just seen it used before for this type of work. Anyways, from there I check if there are any sub sits, if not I log the end of the branch, if there are, I call the function again using the new url and repeat the process. Looking at my console, it seems to work as intended. function getSiteTree(){ var tree = $('#treeviewList'); var rootsite = window.location.protocol + "//" + window.location.hostname; var siteEnd = false; getSubSite(rootsite); } function getSubSite(url){ $().SPServices({ operation: "GetWebCollection", webURL: url, async: true, completefunc: function(xData, Status) { var siteUrl; var siteCount = $(xData.responseXML).find("Web").length; if(siteCount == 0){ console.log("end of branch"); siteEnd = true; }else{ $(xData.responseXML).find("Web").each(function() { siteUrl = $(this).attr("Url"); console.log(siteUrl); getSubSite(siteUrl); }); } } }); } My questions: now that I have my sites, I need to take those sites and create something like this but I'm not sure how to accomplish this. <li>Site 1 <ul> <li>sub 1.1</li> <li>sub 1.2</li> <li>sub 1.3</li> <ul> <li>1.3.1</li> </ul> <li>sub 1.4</li> <li>sub 1.5</li> </ul> </li> <li>Site 2 <ul> <li>sub 2.1</li> <li>sub 2.2</li> <li>sub 2.3</li> <ul> <li>2.3.1</li> <li>2.3.2</li> </ul> </ul> </li> </ul> I have this inital html: <div id="treeviewDiv" style="width:200px;height:150px;overflow:scroll"> <ui id="treeviewList"></ui> </div>

    Read the article

  • html form using input as a submit button

    - by Mike
    Hello onlookers, A web site I've been using has some interesting behavior... There is a form, but there is no button for submission. Instead, there is an input: <input id="ctl00_pageContent_loginButton" type="image" style="border-width: 0px;" alt="Login" src="images/btn_login.gif" name="ctl00$pageContent$loginButton"/> and when you hover over it the cursor turns into a hand, like an anchor tag -- however I do not see any css (in firebug) showing that the input should have a hover attribute. Further, the input does not have any sign of being an actual link/submission button. I'm stumped -- would love to know how they were able to do this. The web page is: https://my.sa.ucsb.edu/gold/Login.aspx Thank you!

    Read the article

  • Object drag delay issue

    - by Johnny Darvall
    I have this code that drags stuff around perfectly in IE - however in firefox the onmousedown-drag of the object does not immediately drag but shows the no-entry cursor and then after onmouseup the object drags around freely. The object does stop draging on the next onmouseup. The object should only drag in the onmousdown state, while the onmousup call should cancel the drag by making j_OK=0. I think it may have something to do with the image inside... the object: <em style=position:absolute;left:0;top:0;width:32;height:32;display:block> < img src=abc.gif onmousedown=P_MV(this.parentNode) style=position:absolute;left:0;top:0;width:inherit> </em> function P_MV(t) { p_E=t j_oy=parseInt(p_E.style.top) j_ox=parseInt(p_E.style.left) j_OK=1 document.onselectstart=function(){return false} document.onmousemove=P_MVy } function P_MVy(e) { if(j_OK) { p_E.style.top=(j_FF?e.clientY:event.clientY)-j_y+j_oy p_E.style.left=(j_FF?e.clientX:event.clientX)-j_x+j_ox } return false }

    Read the article

  • jquery ui autocomplete does't close options menu if there is no focus when ajax returns

    - by Uri
    I'm using jquery ui autocomplete widget with ajax, and on noticed the following problem. Background: In order for the user to be able to focus on the autocomplete and get the options without typing anything, I use the focus event: autoComp.focus(function() { $(this).autocomplete("search", "");} However this produces the following effect: when the user clicks, an ajax request is being sent. While waiting for the response, the user then clicks elsewhere and the autocomplete is blurred. But as soon as the response returns, the options menu pops out, even though the autocomplete has no focus. In order to make it go away the user has to click once inside, and again outside the autocomplete, which is a bit annoying. any ideas how I prevent this? EDIT: I solved this in a very ugly way by building another mediator function that knows the element's ID, and this function calls the ajax function with the ID, which on success check the focus of the element, and returns null if it's not focused. It's pretty ugly and I'm still looking for alternatives. EDIT#2: Tried to do as Wlliam suggested, still doesn't work.. the xhr is undefined when blurring. Some kind of a problem with the this keyword, maybe it has different meanings if I write the getTags function outside of the autocomplete? this.autocomplete = $('.tab#'+this.id+' #tags').autocomplete({ minLength: 0, autoFocus: true, source: getTags, select: function(e, obj) { tab_id = $(this).parents('.tab').attr('id'); tabs[tab_id].addTag(obj.item.label, obj.item.id, false); $(this).blur(); // This is done so that the options menu won't pop up again. return false; // This is done so that the value will not stay in the input box after selection. }, open: function() {}, close: function() {} }); $('.tab#'+this.id+' #tags').focus(function() { $(this).autocomplete("search", ""); }); $('.tab#'+this.id+' #tags').blur(function() { console.log('blurring'); var xhr = $(this).data('xhr'); // This comes out undefined... :( if (xhr) { xhr.abort(); }; $(this).removeClass('ui-autocomplete-loading'); }); and this is the getTags function copied to the source keyword: function getTags(request, response) { console.log('Getting tags.'); $(this).data('xhr', $.ajax({ url: '/rpc', dataType: 'json', data: { action: 'GetLabels', arg0: JSON.stringify(request.term) }, success: function(data) { console.log('Tags arrived:'); tags = []; for (i in data) { a = {} a.id = data[i]['key']; a.label = data[i]['name']; tags.push(a); } response(tags); } })); console.log($(this).data('xhr')); }

    Read the article

  • Ajax post request, an object that includes an array and other objects, can't be parsed correctly int

    - by Waheedi
    what i want is to get a proper parameter, if you see the parameter been logged you would tell there is something wrong my javasript: first run the runMe function Ajax: function() { var xmlhttp, bComplete = false; try { xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject("Msxml2.XMLHTTP"); } catch (e) { try { xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } catch (e) { try { xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); } catch (e) { xmlhttp = false; }}} if (!xmlhttp) return null; this.connect = function(sURL, sMethod, sVars, fnDone) { if (!xmlhttp) return false; bComplete = false; sMethod = sMethod.toUpperCase(); try { if (sMethod == "GET") { xmlhttp.open(sMethod, sURL+"?"+sVars, true); sVars = ""; } else { xmlhttp.open(sMethod, sURL); xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Method", "POST "+sURL+" HTTP/1.1"); xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Content-Type", "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"); xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Content-length", sVars.length); } xmlhttp.onreadystatechange = function(){ if (xmlhttp.readyState == 4 && !bComplete) { bComplete = true; fnDone(xmlhttp); }}; xmlhttp.send(sVars); } catch(z) { return false; } return true; }; return this; }, tOrigin: function(origin){ this.origin = origin; }, tObject: function(origins,url,apik){ this.origins=origins; //this is an array this.url=url; this.apik=apik; this.host= "http://localhost:3000/";//window.location.hostname; } runMe: function(){ var t = new tObject(['this','word','word me please','and me please','word','word','okay','word','go','go'],window.location.href,"helloapik"); // console.log(t); ajax = new Ajax(); ajax.connect("http://localhost:3000/","POST",JSON.stringify(t), callBackFunc) } this is what I'm getting in my rails server log Parameters: {"{\"origins\":"={"{\"origin\":\"this\"},{\"origin\":\"word\"},{\"origin\":\"word me please\"},{\"origin\":\"and me please\"},{\"origin\":\"word\"},{\"origin\":\"word\"},{\"origin\":\"word\"},{\"origin\":\"okay\"},{\"origin\":\"word\"},{\"origin\":\"go\"},{\"origin\":\"go\"}"={",\"url\":\"file:///Users/waheed/Desktop/untitled.html\",\"apik\":\"helloapik\",\"host\":\"http://localhost:3000/\"}"=nil}}}

    Read the article

  • Use jQuery Fancybox(lightbox type dialog) with dynamically loaded links

    - by Pjack
    I'm trying to bind Fancy box links so that when the new links are created it will still work. I've seen a few other question on here but not really answered. This is what I'm trying to do. jQuery("a#[id^='domore_']").fancybox({ 'autoDimensions' : false, 'width' : 'auto', 'height' : 'auto' }); This works fine but when the page or links are reloaded by ajax it doesn't work. I tried using live() but I couldn't get it to work. How do you rebind or implement live on fancybox? Any way to do this? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Recommended way to remove events on destroy with jQuery UI Widget Factory

    - by user1031947
    I'm using the jQuery UI Widget Factory to build a jQuery plugin. My plugin binds custom events to the window... _subscribe: function() { $(window).on("dragger.started", function() { ... }); } I am wondering how to go about removing these events, when a particular instance of the plugin is destroyed. If I use... destroy: function() { $(window).off("dragger.started"); } ...then that will mess up any other instances of the plugin on the page, as it will remove all "dragger.started" events. What is the recommended way to go about destroying only those events that are associated with an instance of the plugin? Thanks (in advance) for your help.

    Read the article

  • How to redirect to a page using a button tag in html?

    - by Vlad Radulescu
    When I Click a button I want to get redirected to a page. The problem is...if I use the normal sintax , the button works fine, but If I apply some css to id by ussing # and .(classes) ,the button it`s not working any more ?! How can I keep my css and functionality at the same time ?! This is my code: <body> <input id="buttonrain" class="classname" type="button" onClick="window.location.href='rain.html'" value="Rain" /> <!--or <a href="rain.html" id="buttonrain" class="classname">Rain</a> still not working--> </body> CSS FILE html { min-width: 100%; min-height: 100%; } body{ width: 1024px; height:600px; background:white; margin:0px; padding:0px 0px; display:block; overflow:hidden; } .classname { -moz-box-shadow:inset 0px 1px 0px 0px #ffffff; -webkit-box-shadow:inset 0px 1px 0px 0px #ffffff; box-shadow:inset 0px 1px 0px 0px #ffffff; background:-webkit-gradient( linear, left top, left bottom, color-stop(0.05, #f0ea3c), color-stop(1, #dfdfdf) ); background:-moz-linear-gradient( center top, #f0ea3c 5%, #dfdfdf 100% ); filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorstr='#f0ea3c', endColorstr='#dfdfdf'); background-color:#f0ea3c; -moz-border-radius:6px; -webkit-border-radius:6px; border-radius:6px; border:1px solid #dcdcdc; display:inline-block; color:#0f000f; font-family:Verdana; font-size:15px; font-weight:bold; padding:18px 9px; text-decoration:none; text-shadow:1px 1px 0px #ffffff; position:relative; bottom:250px; }.classname:active { position:relative; top:1px; } #buttonrain{ left:80px; }

    Read the article

  • How to reference a specific object in an array of objects using jTemplates

    - by Travis
    I am using the excellent jTemplates plugin to generate content. Given a data object like this... var data = { name: 'datatable', table: [ {id: 1, name: 'Anne'}, {id: 2, name: 'Amelie'}, {id: 3, name: 'Polly'}, {id: 4, name: 'Alice'}, {id: 5, name: 'Martha'} ] }; ..I'm wondering if it is possible to directly specify an object in an array of objects using $T. (I'm hoping there is something like $T.table:3 available) Currently the only way I can think of to access a specific object in an array is to do something like this... {#foreach $T.table as record} {#if $T.record$iteration == 3} This is record 3! Name: {$T.record.name} {#/if} {#/for} However that seems clumsy... Any suggestions? Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to get rid of Internet Explorer 7 reloading on fragment change

    - by Philippe Beaudoin
    I have an anchor <a href="#!admin">General</a> somewhere in my page. Clicking this in any browser but IE7 (haven't tried IE6) causes no page reload, as expected. However, under IE7 it reloads the page as soon as it's clicked. The strangest thing is that I have the exact same anchor elsewhere in the page and it causes no reload. The only difference I can see between these is a slight difference in style, and the fact that the faulty anchor is deeply nested in divs, where the other is closer to the top. My questions: Is this a known bug with IE7? If so, is there any work around? If not, any clue as to what might be going wrong? Edit: If you want to see this yourself, go to http://filouguestbook.appspot.com/#!main sign-in with a google account and click on the Settings link the the top bar. Switch between the General and Accounts pages, the app will reload. From the Accounts page, click on Settings in the top bar, this will switch tab but not reload!

    Read the article

  • Web Application Loading Screen

    - by Matt Charlton
    I have a web app that has several tree views. When the page loads i see the unordered lists and after a small latency the styling of the tree is rendered into the DOM. Is there a way to mask the webapp, and have a spinner in the middle of the screen, and when everything on the page is fully rendered the spinner goes away and the mask fades out? Kind of like a semi transparent mask that you would see on a lightbox pop-up dialog.

    Read the article

  • webkit - css transition effect on a div

    - by Mak Killbers
    I am trying to do fadein/out effect when I change innerHTML of a div. Even tried example given at safari doc I want the div to fade-out, change the contents and then fade-in again with new content. <style> .cv { background-color: #eee; -webkit-transition: all 1s ease-in-out;} .cf {opacity: 0;} </style> <body> <div id="main"> <div id="c"> OLD </div> </div> </body> <script> var c = document.getElementById("c"); c.setAttribute("class", "cf"); c.innerHTML = ''; c.appendChild(fragment); c.setAttribute("class", "cv"); </script> Please help me here

    Read the article

  • Why is Chrome miscalculating jQuery submenu dimensions?

    - by chunkymonkey
    I'm trying to implement this dropdown menu with flyouts: http://jsfiddle.net/chunkymonkey/fr6x4/ In Chrome certain categories can be expanded to show their subcategories while others show nothing when opened up. For example: Alternative Rock can be expanded to show its multiple subcategories . . . BUT . . . World Music, which has as many subcategories, shows no subcategories when expanded. (SCREENSHOT: http://i.imgur.com/0WorR.jpg) I thought I had tracked this problem down to a problem with they way the dimensions of the dropdown elements are calculated in the original code: First change: - var newLeftVal = - ($('.fg-menu-current').parents('ul').size() - 1) * 180; + var newLeftVal = - ($('.fg-menu-current').parents('ul').size() - 1) * container.width(); Second change: Remove: var checkMenuHeight = function(el) { if (el.height() > options.maxHeight) { el.addClass('fg-menu-scroll') }; el.css({ height: options.maxHeight }); }; Add: var checkMenuHeight = function(el) { var max_height = options.maxHeight - breadcrumb.getTotalHeight(); if (el.height() > max_height) { el.addClass('fg-menu-scroll'); el.height(max_height); topList.height(max_height); } else { if (topList.height() < el.height()) { topList.height(el.height()); } } }; But it's still not working only on Chrome (version 8, Windows & Mac) (not sure why Chrome is different).

    Read the article

  • Helper functions & prototype methods to replace heavy frameworks?

    - by Rob
    All frameworks aside, what are some of the common helper functions/prototype methods you use on a daily basis? Please note I am not arguing against frameworks. I've simply found that the majority of what I do on a daily basis can, most often, be done with a few dozen Array, String and Element.prototype methods. With the addition of a few helper functions like $ (getElementsById) and $$$ (getElementsByClass), I am able to satisfy some of the core benefits, however basic, of a much heavier framework. If you were to collect a small library of basic methods and functions to replace the core functionality of some of the popular frameworks, what would they be?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502  | Next Page >