Search Results

Search found 36756 results on 1471 pages for 'mysql real query'.

Page 500/1471 | < Previous Page | 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507  | Next Page >

  • SQL Query - group by more than one column, but distinct

    - by Ranhiru
    I have a bidding table, as follows: SellID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES SellItem(SellID), CusID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES Customer(CusID), Amount FLOAT NOT NULL, BidTime DATETIME DEFAULT getdate() Now in my website I need to show the user the current bids; only the highest bid but without repeating the same user. SELECT CusID, Max(Amount) FROM Bid WHERE SellID = 10 GROUP BY CusID ORDER BY Max(Amount) DESC This is the best I have achieved so far. This gives the CusID of each user with the maximum bid and it is ordered ascending. But I need to get the BidTime for each result as well. When I try to put the BidTime in to the query: SELECT CusID, Max(Amount), BidTime FROM Bid WHERE SellID = 10 GROUP BY CusID ORDER BY Max(Amount) DESC I am told that "Column 'Bid.BidTime' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause." Thus I tried: SELECT CusID, Max(Amount), BidTime FROM Bid WHERE SellID = 10 GROUP BY CusID, BidTime ORDER BY Max(Amount) DESC But this returns all the rows. No distinction. Any suggestions on solving this issue?

    Read the article

  • Database design grouping contacts by lists and companies

    - by Serge
    Hi, I'm wondering what would be the best way to group contacts by their company. Right now a user can group their contacts by custom created lists but I'd like to be able to group contacts by their company as well as store the contact's position (i.e. Project Manager of XYZ company). Database wise this is what I have for grouping contacts into lists contact [id_contact] [int] PK NOT NULL, [lastName] [varchar] (128) NULL, [firstName] [varchar] (128) NULL, ...... contact_list [id_contact] [int] FK, [id_list] [int] FK, list [id_list] [int] PK [id_user] [int] FK [list_name] [varchar] (128) NOT NULL, [description] [TEXT] NULL Should I implement something similar for grouping contacts by company? If so how would I store the contact's position in that company and how can I prevent data corruption if a user modifies a contact's company name. For instance John Doe changed companies but the other co-workers are still in the old company. I doubt that will happen often (might not even happen at all) but better be safe than sorry. I'm also keeping an audit trail so in a way the contact would still need to be linked to the old company as well as the new one but without confusing what company he's actually working at the moment. I hope that made sense... Has anyone encountered such a problem? UPDATE Would something like this make sense contact_company [id_contact_company] [int] PK [id_contact] [int] FK [id_company] [int] FK [contact_title] [varchar] (128) company [id_company] [int] PK NOT NULL, [company_name] [varchar] (128) NULL, [company_description] [varchar] (300) NULL, [created_date] [datetime] NOT NULL This way a contact can work for more than one company and contacts can be grouped by companies

    Read the article

  • In SQL, if we rename INNER JOIN as INTERSECT JOIN, LEFT OUTER JOIN as LEFT UNION JOIN, and FULL OUTE

    - by Jian Lin
    In SQL, the name Join gives an idea of "merging" or a sense of "union", making something bigger. But in fact, as in the other post http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2706051/in-sql-a-join-is-actually-an-intersection-and-it-is-also-a-linkage-or-a-sidew it turns out that a Join (Inner Join) is actually an Intersection. So if we think of Join = Inner Join = Intersect Join Left Outer Join = Left Union Join Full Outer Join = Full Union Join = Union Join then we always get a feel of what's happening, and maybe never forget what they are easily. In a way, we can think of Intersect as "making it less", therefore it is excluding something. That's why the name "Join" won't go with the idea of "Intersect". But in fact, both Intersect and Union can be thought of as: Union: bringing something together and merge them unconditionally. Intersect: bringing something together and merge them based on some condition. so the "bringing something together" is probably what "Join" is all about. It is like, Intersection is a "half glass of water" -- we can thinking of it as "excluding something" or as "bringing something together and accepting the common ones". So if the word "Intersect Join" is used, maybe a clear picture is there, and "Union Join" can be a clear picture too. Maybe the word "Inner Join" and "Outer Join" is very clear when we use SQL a lot. Somehow, the word "Outer" tends to give a feeling that it is "outside" and excluding something rather than a "Union".

    Read the article

  • How do I call up values in PHP for user input in forms (radio buttons and selects)

    - by Derek
    Ok so my admin sets to edit a book which was created. I know how to bring in the values that were initially entered via a simple text field like 'bookname'. On the edit book page the book name field stores the currently assigned 'bookname' in the field (which is what I want! :) ) However I have other field types like selects and radio button entries...I'm having trouble calling in the already set value when the book was created. For example, there is a 'booklevel' field, which I have set as radio button entries as; Hard, Normal, and Easy. When the user goes to edit the book, I'm not too sure on how to have the current value drawn up (its stored as text) and the radio button being checked. I.e. 'Normal' is checked if this is what was set when the book was created. So far I have this as the code for the adding book level: <label>Book Level:</label> <label for="booklevel1" class="radio">Hard <input type="radio" name="booklevel" id="booklevel1" value="<?php echo 'Hard'; if (isset($_POST['booklevel'])); ?>"></label> <label for="booklevel2" class="radio">Medium<input type="radio" name="booklevel" id="booklevel2" value="<?php echo 'Normal'; if (isset($_POST['booklevel'])); ?>"></label> <label for="booklevel" class="radio">Low<input type="radio" name="booklevel" id="booklevel3" value="<?php echo 'Easy'; if (isset($_POST['booklevel'])); ?>"></label> This all works fine by the way when the user adds the book... But does anyone know how in my update book form, I can draw the value of what level has been set, and have the box checked?? To draw up the values in the text fields, I'm simply using: <?php echo $row['bookname']?> I also noticed a small issue when I call up the values for my Select options. I have the drop down select field display the currently set user (to read the book!), however, the drop down menu again displays the user in the list available options to select - basically meaning 2 of the same names appear in the list! Is there a way to eliminate the value of the SELECTED option? So far my setup for this is like: <select name="user_id" id="user_id"> <option value="<?php echo $row['user_id']?>" SELECTED><?php echo $row['fullname']?></option> <?php while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)) { ?> <option value="<?php echo $row['user_id']?>"><?php echo $row['name']?></option> <?php } ?> </select> If anyone can help me I'll be very greatful. Sorry for the incredibly long question!! :)

    Read the article

  • Why can't I get a TRUE return in this prepared statement?

    - by Cortopasta
    I can't seem to get this to do anything but return false. My best guess is that the prepared statement isn't executing, but I have no idea why. private function check_credentials($plain_username, $md5_password) { global $dbcon; $ac = new ac(); $ac->dbconnect(); $userid = $dbcon->prepare('SELECT id FROM users WHERE username = :username AND password = :password LIMIT 1'); $userid->bindParam(':username', $plain_username); $userid->bindParam(':password', $md5_password); $userid->execute(); $id = $userid->fetch(); Return $id; } *EDIT:*I've even tried hard coding the username and password into the function itself to try and isolate the problem like this: private function check_credentials($plain_username, $md5_password) { global $dbcon; $plain_username = "jim"; $md5_username = "waffles"; $ac = new ac(); $ac->dbconnect(); $userid = $dbcon->prepare('SELECT id FROM users WHERE username = :username AND password = :password LIMIT 1'); $userid->bindParam(':username', $plain_username); $userid->bindParam(':password', $md5_password); $userid->execute(); print_r($dbcon->errorInfo()); $id = $userid->fetch(); Return $id; } Still nothing :-/

    Read the article

  • Fixing Unicode Oops

    - by Mez
    It seems that we have managed to insert into our database 2 unicode characters for each of the unicode characters we want, For example, for the unicde char 0x3CBC, we've inserted the unicode equivalents for each of it's components (0xC383 AND 0xC2BC) Can anyone think of a simple solution for fixing this? I've come up with something like SELECT replace(name, CONCAT(0xC3,0x83,0xc2,0xbc), CONCAT(0xc3,0xbc)) FROM lang For the above, but don't want to have to do this for every unicode character!

    Read the article

  • PHP: Array of objects is empty when I come to retrieve one from the array

    - by Tom
    Good morning, I am trying to load rows from a database and then create objects from them and add these objects to a private array. Here are my classes: <?php include("databaseconnect.php"); class stationItem { private $code = ''; private $description = ''; public function setCode($code ){ $this->code = $code; } public function getCode(){ return $this->code; } public function setDescription($description){ $this->description = $description; } public function getDescription(){ return $this->description; } } class stationList { private $stationListing; function __construct() { connect(); $stationListing = array(); $result = mysql_query('SELECT * FROM stations'); while ($row = mysql_fetch_assoc($result)) { $station = new stationItem(); $station->setCode($row['code']); $station->setDescription($row['description']); array_push($stationListing, $station); } mysql_free_result($result); } public function getStation($index){ return $stationListing[$index]; } } ?> As you can see I am creating a stationItem object per database row (which for now has a code and description) and I then push these on to the end of my array which is held as a private variable in stationList. This is code which creates this classes and attempts to access the properties on them: $stations = new stationList(); $station = $stations->getStation(0); echo $station->getCode(); I am finding that the sizeof($stationList) at the end of the constructor is 1 but then it is zero when we come to try to get an object from the array using the index. Therefore the error that I get is: Fatal error: Call to a member function getCode() on a non-object Please can someone explain to me why this is happening? I guess I am misunderstanding how object references work in PHP5.

    Read the article

  • Problem with SQL, ResultSet in java

    - by aphex
    How can I iterate ResultSet ? I've tried with the following code, but i get the error java.sql.SQLException: Illegal operation on empty result set. while ( !rs.isLast()) { rs.next(); int id = rs.getInt("person_id"); SQL.getInstance().getSt().execute("INSERT ref_person_pub(person_id) VALUES(" + id + ")"); }

    Read the article

  • Linq for java

    - by Milhous
    Would a LINQ for java be a useful tool? I have been working on a tool that will allow a java object to map to a row in a database. Would this be useful for java programmers? What features would be useful?

    Read the article

  • ON DELETE RESTRICT Causing Error 150

    - by Levi Hackwith
    CREATE TABLE project ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, created_at DATETIME NOT NULL, name VARCHAR(75) NOT NULL, description LONGTEXT NOT NULL, is_active TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULT '1', PRIMARY KEY (id), INDEX(name, created_at) ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE role ( id INTEGER NOT NULL, name VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, description LONGTEXT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE organization ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, created_at DATETIME NOT NULL, name VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL, is_active TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULT '1', PRIMARY KEY (id) ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE user ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, created_at DATETIME NOT NULL, role_id INTEGER NOT NULL, organization_id INTEGER NOT NULL, last_login_at DATETIME NOT NULL, last_ip_address VARCHAR(25) NOT NULL, username VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, password CHAR(32) NOT NULL, email_address VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, first_name VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, last_name VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, address_1 VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL, address_2 VARCHAR(25) NULL, city VARCHAR(25) NOT NULL, state CHAR(2) NOT NULL, zip_code VARCHAR(10) NOT NULL, primary_phone_number VARCHAR(10) NOT NULL, secondary_phone_number VARCHAR(10) NOT NULL, is_primary_organization_contact TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULT '0', is_active TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULT '1', PRIMARY KEY (id), CONSTRAINT fk_user_role_id FOREIGN KEY (role_id) REFERENCES role (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_user_organization_id FOREIGN KEY (organization_id) REFERENCES organization (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE project_user ( user_id INTEGER NOT NULL, project_id INTEGER NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (user_id, project_id), CONSTRAINT fk_project_user_user_id FOREIGN KEY (user_id) REFERENCES user (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE CASCADE, CONSTRAINT fk_project_user_project_id FOREIGN KEY (project_id) REFERENCES project (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE ticket_category ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, name VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL, description LONGTEXT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE ticket_type ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, name VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL, description LONGTEXT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE ticket_status ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, name VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL, description LONGTEXT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE ticket ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, created_at DATETIME NOT NULL, project_id INTEGER NOT NULL, created_by INTEGER NOT NULL, submitted_by INTEGER NOT NULL, assigned_to INTEGER NULL, category_id INTEGER NOT NULL, type_id INTEGER NOT NULL, title VARCHAR(75) NOT NULL, description LONGTEXT NOT NULL, contact_type_id TINYINT NOT NULL, affects_all_clients TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULT '0', is_billable TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULT '1', esimated_hours DECIMAL(4, 1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0', hours_worked DECIMAL (4, 1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0', status_id TINYINT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id), CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_project_id FOREIGN KEY (project_id) REFERENCES project (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_created_by FOREIGN KEY (created_by) REFERENCES user (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_submitted_by FOREIGN KEY (submitted_by) REFERENCES user (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_assigned_to FOREIGN KEY (assigned_to) REFERENCES user (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_category_id FOREIGN KEY (category_id) REFERENCES ticket_category (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_type_id FOREIGN KEY (type_id) REFERENCES ticket_type (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_status_id FOREIGN KEY (status_id) REFERENCES ticket_status (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE ticket_time_entry ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, user_id INTEGER NOT NULL, ticket_id INTEGER NOT NULL, started_at DATETIME NOT NULL, ended_at DATETIME NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id), CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_time_entry_user_id FOREIGN KEY (user_id) REFERENCES user (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_time_entry_ticket_id FOREIGN KEY (ticket_id) REFERENCES ticket (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT ) ENGINE = INNODB; The ticket table's create statement causes an error 150. I have no clue why. When I remove the ON DELETE RESTRICT statements from the table declaration, it works. Why is that?

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to "merge" the values of multiple records into a single field without using a stored

    - by j0rd4n
    A co-worker posed this question to me, and I told them, "No, you'll need to write a sproc for that". But I thought I'd give them a chance and put this out to the community. Essentially, they have a table with keys mapping to multiple values. For a report, they want to aggregate on the key and "mash" all of the values into a single field. Here's a visual: --- ------- Key Value --- ------- 1 A 1 B 1 C 2 X 2 Y The result would be as follows: --- ------- Key Value --- ------- 1 A,B,C 2 X,Y They need this in SQLServer 2005. Again, I think they need to write a stored procedure, but if anyone knows a magic out-of-the-box function that does this, I'd be impressed.

    Read the article

  • Apply a recursive CTE on grouped table rows (SQL server 2005).

    - by Evan V.
    Hi all, I have a table (ROOMUSAGE) containing the times people check in and out of rooms grouped by PERSONKEY and ROOMKEY. It looks like this: PERSONKEY | ROOMKEY | CHECKIN | CHECKOUT | ROW ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1 | 8 | 13-4-2010 10:00 | 13-4-2010 11:00 | 1 1 | 8 | 13-4-2010 08:00 | 13-4-2010 09:00 | 2 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 1 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 14:00 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 2 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 13:00 | 13-4-2010 14:00 | 3 13 | 2 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 1 13 | 2 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 2 I want to select just the consecutive rows for each PERSONKEY, ROOMKEY grouping. So the desired resulting table is: PERSONKEY | ROOMKEY | CHECKIN | CHECKOUT | ROW ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1 | 8 | 13-4-2010 10:00 | 13-4-2010 11:00 | 1 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 1 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 14:00 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 2 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 13:00 | 13-4-2010 14:00 | 3 13 | 2 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 1 I want to avoid using cursors so I thought I would use a recursive CTE. Here is what I came up with: ;with CTE (PERSONKEY, ROOMKEY, CHECKIN, CHECKOUT, ROW) as (select RU.PERSONKEY, RU.ROOMKEY, RU.CHECKIN, RU.CHECKOUT, RU.ROW from ROOMUSAGE RU where RU.ROW = 1 union all select RU.PERSONKEY, RU.ROOMKEY, RU.CHECKIN, RU.CHECKOUT, RU.ROW from ROOMUSAGE RU inner join CTE on RU.ROWNUM = CTE.ROWNUM + 1 where CTE.CHECKIN = RU.CHECKOUT and CTE.PERSONKEY = RU.PERSONKEY and CTE.ROOMKEY = RU.ROOMKEY) This worked OK for very small datasets (under 100 records) but it's unusable on large datasets. I'm thinking that I should somehow apply the cte recursevely on each PERSONKEY, ROOMKEY grouping on my ROOMUSAGE table but I am not sure how to do that. Any help would be much appreciated, Cheers!

    Read the article

  • PHP Variable with Array

    - by Crays
    Hi guys, i'm trying to make a "update user's power" page. It is something similar to those you can find in say, invisionfree forums. I need it to generate a list of members with checkbox [done] Add an option for it [done] What i don't know how to do is to update, to say, give all the selected users the selected power. Then i went searching for something and found most of them uses array to do this, but i never found one that actually explains how it works. The example i took (with my own modification) was this: while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)) { echo '<tr>'.$id[]=$rows['id'].''; echo '<td width="50px" align="center" class="TableFormCell"><input type="checkbox" name="option[]" /></td>'; echo '<td width="170px" align="center" class="TableFormCell">'.$row['uname'].'</td>'; echo '</tr>'; } I'm not sure what exactly $id[]=$rows['id'] does I know after the row, my option[] would become an array of option[1], option[2], option[3] for what power should be given, i've got no problem with that but on how to update the database i'm got no clue... for($i=0;$i<$count;$i++){ $sql1="UPDATE ninos SET power='$power' WHERE id='$option[$i]'"; $result1=mysql_query($sql1); } So Say i have 5 users, Aye, Bee, Cee, Dee, Eee with IDs of 1,2,3,4,5 how can i make it so that my script would run like $sql1="UPDATE ninos SET power = '$power' Where id='1','2','3','4','5'"; Please help, thanks.

    Read the article

  • How do I delete a foreign key in SQLAlchemy?

    - by Travis
    I'm using SQLAlchemy Migrate to keep track of database changes and I'm running into an issue with removing a foreign key. I have two tables, t_new is a new table, and t_exists is an existing table. I need to add t_new, then add a foreign key to t_exists. Then I need to be able to reverse the operation (which is where I'm having trouble). t_new = sa.Table("new", meta.metadata, sa.Column("new_id", sa.types.Integer, primary_key=True) ) t_exists = sa.Table("exists", meta.metadata, sa.Column("exists_id", sa.types.Integer, primary_key=True), sa.Column( "new_id", sa.types.Integer, sa.ForeignKey("new.new_id", onupdate="CASCADE", ondelete="CASCADE"), nullable=False ) ) This works fine: t_new.create() t_exists.c.new_id.create() But this does not: t_exists.c.new_id.drop() t_new.drop() Trying to drop the foreign key column gives an error: 1025, "Error on rename of '.\my_db_name\#sql-1b0_2e6' to '.\my_db_name\exists' (errno: 150)" If I do this with raw SQL, i can remove the foreign key manually then remove the column, but I haven't been able to figure out how to remove the foreign key with SQLAlchemy? How can I remove the foreign key, and then the column?

    Read the article

  • Data sync solution?

    - by user321088
    For some security issues I'm in an envorinment where third party apps can't access my DB. For this reason I should have some service/tool/script (dunno what yet... i'm open to the best option, still reading to see what I'm gonna do...) which enables me to generate on a regular basis(daily, weekly, monthly) some csv file with all new/modified records for a certain application. I should be able to automate this process and also export at any time a new file. So it should keep track for each application which records he still needs. Each application will need some data in some other format (csv/xls/sql), also some fields will be needed for some application and some aren't... It should be fairly flexible... What is the best option for me? Creating some custom tables for each application? Based on that extracting modified data?

    Read the article

  • Bus Timetable database design

    - by paddydub
    hi, I'm trying to design a db to store the timetable for 300 different bus routes, Each route has a different number of stops and different times for Monday-Friday, Saturday and Sunday. I've represented the bus departure times for each route as follows, I'm not sure if i should have null values in the table, does this look ok? route,Num,Day, t1, t2, t3, t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 t9 t10 117, 1, Monday, 9:00, 9:30, 10:50, 12:00, 14:00 18:00 19:00 null null null 117, 2, Monday, 9:03, 9:33, 10:53, 12:03, 14:03 18:03 19:03 null null null 117, 3, Monday, 9:06, 9:36, 10:56, 12:06, 14:06 18:06 19:06 null null null 117, 4, Monday, 9:09, 9:39, 10:59, 12:09, 14:09 18:09 19:09 null null null . . . 117, 20, Monday, 9:39, 10.09, 11:39, 12:39, 14:39 18:39 19:39 null null null 119, 1, Monday, 9:00, 9:30, 10:50, 12:00, 14:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 119, 2, Monday, 9:03, 9:33, 10:53, 12:03, 14:03 18:03 19:03 20:03 21:03 22:03 119, 3, Monday, 9:06, 9:36, 10:56, 12:06, 14:06 18:06 19:06 20:06 21:06 22:06 119, 4, Monday, 9:09, 9:39, 10:59, 12:09, 14:09 18:09 19:09 20:09 21:09 22:09 . . . 119, 37, Monday, 9:49, 9:59, 11:59, 12:59, 14:59 18:59 19:59 20:59 21:59 22:59 139, 1, Sunday, 9:00, 9:30, 20:00 21:00 22:00 null null null null null 139, 2, Sunday, 9:03, 9:33, 20:03 21:03 22:03 null null null null null 139, 3, Sunday, 9:06, 9:36, 20:06 21:06 22:06 null null null null null 139, 4, Sunday, 9:09, 9:39, 20:09 21:09 22:09 null null null null null . . . 139, 20, Sunday, 9:49, 9:59, 20:59 21:59 22:59 null null null null null

    Read the article

  • How to get the last element by date of each "type" in LINQ or TSQL

    - by Mauro
    Imagine to have a table defined as CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Price]( [ID] [int] NOT NULL, [StartDate] [datetime] NOT NULL, [Price] [int] NOT NULL ) where ID is the identifier of an action having a certain Price. This price can be updated if necessary by adding a new line with the same ID, different Price, and a more recent date. So with a set of a data like ID StartDate Price 1 01/01/2009 10 1 01/01/2010 20 2 01/01/2009 10 2 01/01/2010 20 How to obtain a set like the following? 1 01/01/2010 20 2 01/01/2010 20

    Read the article

  • SubSonic: MySqlDataReader closes connection.

    - by SchlaWiener
    I am using SubSonic 2.1 and entcountered a problem while executing a Transaction with SharedDbConnectionScope and TransactionScope. The problem is that in the obj.Save() method I get an "The connection must be valid and open" exception I tracked down the problem to this line: // Loads a SubSonic ActiveRecord object User user = new User(User.Columns.Username, "John Doe"); in this Constructor of the User class a method "LoadParam" is called which eventually does if (rdr != null) rdr.Close(); It looks like the rdr.Close() implicitly closes my connection which is fine when using the AutomaticConnection. But during a transaction it is usally not a good idea to close the connection :-) My Question is if this is by design or if it's an error in the MySqlDataReader.

    Read the article

  • Symfony fk issue on insertion

    - by Daniel Hertz
    Hi, I posted a similar problem but it could not be resolved. I create a relational database of users and groups but for some reason I cannot insert test data with fixtures properly. Here is a sample of the schema: User: actAs: { Timestampable: ~ } columns: name: { type: string(255), notnull: true } email: { type: string(255), notnull: true, unique: true } nickname: { type: string(255), unique: true } password: { type: string(300), notnull: true } image: { type: string(255) } Group: actAs: { Timestampable: ~ } columns: name: { type: string(500), notnull: true } image: { type: string(255) } type: { type: string(255), notnull: true } created_by_id: { type: integer } relations: User: { onDelete: SET NULL, class: User, local: created_by_id, foreign: id, foreignAlias: groups_created } FanOf: actAs: { Timestampable: ~ } columns: user_id: { type: integer, primary: true } group_id: { type: integer, primary: true } relations: User: { onDelete: CASCADE, local: user_id, foreign: id, foreignAlias: fanhood } Group: { onDelete: CASCADE, local: group_id, foreign: id, foreignAlias: fanhood } And this is the data i try to input: User: user1: name: Danny email: [email protected] nickname: danny password: f05050400c5e586fa6629ef497be Group: group1: name: Mets type: sports FanOf: fans1: user_id: user1 group_id: group1 I keep getting this error: SQLSTATE[23000]: Integrity constraint violation: 1452 Cannot add or update a child row: a foreign key constraint fails (`krowdd`.`fan_of`, CONSTRAINT `fan_of_user_id_user_id` FOREIGN KEY (`user_id`) REFERENCES `user` (`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE) The users and groups are clearly being created before the "fanhood" is so why am I getting this error?? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • ALTER TABLE on dependant column

    - by Sharmi
    I am trying to alter column datatype of a primary key to tinyint from int.This column is a foreign key in other tables.So,I get the following error: Msg 5074, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 The object 'PK_User_tbl' is dependent on column 'appId'. Msg 5074, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 The object 'FK_Details_tbl_User_tbl' is dependent on column 'appId'. Msg 5074, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 The object 'FK_Log_tbl_User_tbl' is dependent on column 'appId'. Msg 4922, Level 16, State 9, Line 1 ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN appId failed because one or more objects access this column. Howw should i rectify this?

    Read the article

  • One table, need multiple values from different rows/tuples

    - by WmasterJ
    I have tables like: 'profile_values' userID | fid | value -------+---------+------- 1 | 3 | [email protected] 1 | 45 | 203-234-2345 3 | 3 | [email protected] 1 | 45 | 123-456-7890 And: 'users' userID | name -------+------- 1 | joe 2 | jane 3 | jake I want to join them and have one row with two of the values like: 'profile_values' userID | name | email | phone -------+-------+----------------+-------------- 1 | joe | [email protected] | 203-234-2345 2 | jane | [email protected] | 123-456-7890 I have solved it but it feels clumsy and I want to know if there is a better way to do it. Meaning solutions that are either more readable or faster(optimized) or simply best-practice. Current solution: multiple tables selected, many conditional statements: SELECT u.userID AS memberid, u.name AS first_name, pv1.value AS fname, pv2.value as lname FROM users AS u, profile_values AS pv1, profile_values AS pv2, WHERE u.userID = pv1.userID AND pv1.fid = 3 AND u.userID = pv2.userID AND pv2.fid = 45; Thanks for the help!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507  | Next Page >