Search Results

Search found 36756 results on 1471 pages for 'mysql real query'.

Page 500/1471 | < Previous Page | 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507  | Next Page >

  • SQL Query - group by more than one column, but distinct

    - by Ranhiru
    I have a bidding table, as follows: SellID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES SellItem(SellID), CusID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES Customer(CusID), Amount FLOAT NOT NULL, BidTime DATETIME DEFAULT getdate() Now in my website I need to show the user the current bids; only the highest bid but without repeating the same user. SELECT CusID, Max(Amount) FROM Bid WHERE SellID = 10 GROUP BY CusID ORDER BY Max(Amount) DESC This is the best I have achieved so far. This gives the CusID of each user with the maximum bid and it is ordered ascending. But I need to get the BidTime for each result as well. When I try to put the BidTime in to the query: SELECT CusID, Max(Amount), BidTime FROM Bid WHERE SellID = 10 GROUP BY CusID ORDER BY Max(Amount) DESC I am told that "Column 'Bid.BidTime' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause." Thus I tried: SELECT CusID, Max(Amount), BidTime FROM Bid WHERE SellID = 10 GROUP BY CusID, BidTime ORDER BY Max(Amount) DESC But this returns all the rows. No distinction. Any suggestions on solving this issue?

    Read the article

  • ALTER TABLE on dependant column

    - by Sharmi
    I am trying to alter column datatype of a primary key to tinyint from int.This column is a foreign key in other tables.So,I get the following error: Msg 5074, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 The object 'PK_User_tbl' is dependent on column 'appId'. Msg 5074, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 The object 'FK_Details_tbl_User_tbl' is dependent on column 'appId'. Msg 5074, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 The object 'FK_Log_tbl_User_tbl' is dependent on column 'appId'. Msg 4922, Level 16, State 9, Line 1 ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN appId failed because one or more objects access this column. Howw should i rectify this?

    Read the article

  • How should I go about creating a point system for users like SO and yahoo answers?(PHP)

    - by ggfan
    I am creating a voting system for a Q&A site project in which if a user asks a question, he/she losses -5 points; answer a question +5, vote a question +1, etc. (kind of like SO and yahoo answers) --To create the basic arithmetic, I have a "users_points" table that relates the user_id and their total points. +---+---------+ | 1 | 100 | +---+---------+ | 2 | 54 | +---+---------+ --Basically if the users does certain task, it would + or - the points. How do I prevent users from say voting an answer up 100 times. ex: I want a user to be only able to vote once per question, etc.

    Read the article

  • ON DELETE RESTRICT Causing Error 150

    - by Levi Hackwith
    CREATE TABLE project ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, created_at DATETIME NOT NULL, name VARCHAR(75) NOT NULL, description LONGTEXT NOT NULL, is_active TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULT '1', PRIMARY KEY (id), INDEX(name, created_at) ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE role ( id INTEGER NOT NULL, name VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, description LONGTEXT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE organization ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, created_at DATETIME NOT NULL, name VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL, is_active TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULT '1', PRIMARY KEY (id) ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE user ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, created_at DATETIME NOT NULL, role_id INTEGER NOT NULL, organization_id INTEGER NOT NULL, last_login_at DATETIME NOT NULL, last_ip_address VARCHAR(25) NOT NULL, username VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, password CHAR(32) NOT NULL, email_address VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, first_name VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, last_name VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, address_1 VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL, address_2 VARCHAR(25) NULL, city VARCHAR(25) NOT NULL, state CHAR(2) NOT NULL, zip_code VARCHAR(10) NOT NULL, primary_phone_number VARCHAR(10) NOT NULL, secondary_phone_number VARCHAR(10) NOT NULL, is_primary_organization_contact TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULT '0', is_active TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULT '1', PRIMARY KEY (id), CONSTRAINT fk_user_role_id FOREIGN KEY (role_id) REFERENCES role (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_user_organization_id FOREIGN KEY (organization_id) REFERENCES organization (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE project_user ( user_id INTEGER NOT NULL, project_id INTEGER NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (user_id, project_id), CONSTRAINT fk_project_user_user_id FOREIGN KEY (user_id) REFERENCES user (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE CASCADE, CONSTRAINT fk_project_user_project_id FOREIGN KEY (project_id) REFERENCES project (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE ticket_category ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, name VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL, description LONGTEXT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE ticket_type ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, name VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL, description LONGTEXT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE ticket_status ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, name VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL, description LONGTEXT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE ticket ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, created_at DATETIME NOT NULL, project_id INTEGER NOT NULL, created_by INTEGER NOT NULL, submitted_by INTEGER NOT NULL, assigned_to INTEGER NULL, category_id INTEGER NOT NULL, type_id INTEGER NOT NULL, title VARCHAR(75) NOT NULL, description LONGTEXT NOT NULL, contact_type_id TINYINT NOT NULL, affects_all_clients TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULT '0', is_billable TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULT '1', esimated_hours DECIMAL(4, 1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0', hours_worked DECIMAL (4, 1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0', status_id TINYINT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id), CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_project_id FOREIGN KEY (project_id) REFERENCES project (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_created_by FOREIGN KEY (created_by) REFERENCES user (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_submitted_by FOREIGN KEY (submitted_by) REFERENCES user (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_assigned_to FOREIGN KEY (assigned_to) REFERENCES user (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_category_id FOREIGN KEY (category_id) REFERENCES ticket_category (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_type_id FOREIGN KEY (type_id) REFERENCES ticket_type (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_status_id FOREIGN KEY (status_id) REFERENCES ticket_status (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT ) ENGINE = INNODB; CREATE TABLE ticket_time_entry ( id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, user_id INTEGER NOT NULL, ticket_id INTEGER NOT NULL, started_at DATETIME NOT NULL, ended_at DATETIME NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id), CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_time_entry_user_id FOREIGN KEY (user_id) REFERENCES user (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT, CONSTRAINT fk_ticket_time_entry_ticket_id FOREIGN KEY (ticket_id) REFERENCES ticket (id) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT ) ENGINE = INNODB; The ticket table's create statement causes an error 150. I have no clue why. When I remove the ON DELETE RESTRICT statements from the table declaration, it works. Why is that?

    Read the article

  • Problem with SQL, ResultSet in java

    - by aphex
    How can I iterate ResultSet ? I've tried with the following code, but i get the error java.sql.SQLException: Illegal operation on empty result set. while ( !rs.isLast()) { rs.next(); int id = rs.getInt("person_id"); SQL.getInstance().getSt().execute("INSERT ref_person_pub(person_id) VALUES(" + id + ")"); }

    Read the article

  • How to design tag database structure?

    - by liuxingruo
    I have a subjects database, and I want to create a new tag database to tag the subjects, but I have no idea how to design the new tag database structure. I'm assuming the new database looks like this: tag_id tag_name tagged_subject_ids 1 tag1 1, 2, 3, 5, 10 2 tag2 2, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12 so, if I want to select the tags belong to subject 1: SELECT tag_name FROM tag_database WHERE tagged_subject_ids LIKE '1'; I think the way that I select tag may be very slow, so please help me. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Non Working Relationship

    - by Dominik K.
    Hello everyone, I got a problem with cake's model architecture. I got a Users-Model and a Metas-Model. Here are the model codes: Users: <?php class User extends AppModel { var $name = 'User'; var $validate = array( 'username' => array('notempty'), 'email' => array('email'), 'password' => array('notempty') ); var $displayField = 'username'; var $hasMany = array( 'Meta' => array( 'className' => 'Meta', 'foreignKey' => 'user_id' ) ); } ?> and the Metas Model: <?php class Meta extends AppModel { var $name = 'Meta'; //The Associations below have been created with all possible keys, those that are not needed can be removed var $belongsTo = array( 'User' => array( 'className' => 'User', 'foreignKey' => 'user_id', 'required' => true ) ); } ?> So now the question is why do I not get the Meta data into the User array? Should I get it in the Auth object? Or where can I work with the meta data? hope you can help me! Have a nice Day! Dom

    Read the article

  • In SQL, if we rename INNER JOIN as INTERSECT JOIN, LEFT OUTER JOIN as LEFT UNION JOIN, and FULL OUTE

    - by Jian Lin
    In SQL, the name Join gives an idea of "merging" or a sense of "union", making something bigger. But in fact, as in the other post http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2706051/in-sql-a-join-is-actually-an-intersection-and-it-is-also-a-linkage-or-a-sidew it turns out that a Join (Inner Join) is actually an Intersection. So if we think of Join = Inner Join = Intersect Join Left Outer Join = Left Union Join Full Outer Join = Full Union Join = Union Join then we always get a feel of what's happening, and maybe never forget what they are easily. In a way, we can think of Intersect as "making it less", therefore it is excluding something. That's why the name "Join" won't go with the idea of "Intersect". But in fact, both Intersect and Union can be thought of as: Union: bringing something together and merge them unconditionally. Intersect: bringing something together and merge them based on some condition. so the "bringing something together" is probably what "Join" is all about. It is like, Intersection is a "half glass of water" -- we can thinking of it as "excluding something" or as "bringing something together and accepting the common ones". So if the word "Intersect Join" is used, maybe a clear picture is there, and "Union Join" can be a clear picture too. Maybe the word "Inner Join" and "Outer Join" is very clear when we use SQL a lot. Somehow, the word "Outer" tends to give a feeling that it is "outside" and excluding something rather than a "Union".

    Read the article

  • Looking for a good database structure to achieve Facebook/SO like notifications

    - by user156814
    I want to be able to have notifications on my site, similar to the way SO does it. I have looked for a good table structure to do this, but I cant seem to figure it out. I was thinking something like this. Notifications id, notification_type_id, user_id, type_id Notification Types id, notification_text Where the notification type would relate to either a new post, a new comment, or whatever features I add later down the line... User Id would relate to whoever the notification is for. Type_id and notification type would go hand in hand, so if the notification_type was a new comment, the type_id would be the comment_id to go to. This seems good to me, but i want to be able to notify ALL users when something changes.. like on facebook when you comment on something, you get a notification that someone else has also commented on the same thing after you. I cant seem to figure this out... Help wanted Thanks

    Read the article

  • How do I call up values in PHP for user input in forms (radio buttons and selects)

    - by Derek
    Ok so my admin sets to edit a book which was created. I know how to bring in the values that were initially entered via a simple text field like 'bookname'. On the edit book page the book name field stores the currently assigned 'bookname' in the field (which is what I want! :) ) However I have other field types like selects and radio button entries...I'm having trouble calling in the already set value when the book was created. For example, there is a 'booklevel' field, which I have set as radio button entries as; Hard, Normal, and Easy. When the user goes to edit the book, I'm not too sure on how to have the current value drawn up (its stored as text) and the radio button being checked. I.e. 'Normal' is checked if this is what was set when the book was created. So far I have this as the code for the adding book level: <label>Book Level:</label> <label for="booklevel1" class="radio">Hard <input type="radio" name="booklevel" id="booklevel1" value="<?php echo 'Hard'; if (isset($_POST['booklevel'])); ?>"></label> <label for="booklevel2" class="radio">Medium<input type="radio" name="booklevel" id="booklevel2" value="<?php echo 'Normal'; if (isset($_POST['booklevel'])); ?>"></label> <label for="booklevel" class="radio">Low<input type="radio" name="booklevel" id="booklevel3" value="<?php echo 'Easy'; if (isset($_POST['booklevel'])); ?>"></label> This all works fine by the way when the user adds the book... But does anyone know how in my update book form, I can draw the value of what level has been set, and have the box checked?? To draw up the values in the text fields, I'm simply using: <?php echo $row['bookname']?> I also noticed a small issue when I call up the values for my Select options. I have the drop down select field display the currently set user (to read the book!), however, the drop down menu again displays the user in the list available options to select - basically meaning 2 of the same names appear in the list! Is there a way to eliminate the value of the SELECTED option? So far my setup for this is like: <select name="user_id" id="user_id"> <option value="<?php echo $row['user_id']?>" SELECTED><?php echo $row['fullname']?></option> <?php while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)) { ?> <option value="<?php echo $row['user_id']?>"><?php echo $row['name']?></option> <?php } ?> </select> If anyone can help me I'll be very greatful. Sorry for the incredibly long question!! :)

    Read the article

  • Why can't I get a TRUE return in this prepared statement?

    - by Cortopasta
    I can't seem to get this to do anything but return false. My best guess is that the prepared statement isn't executing, but I have no idea why. private function check_credentials($plain_username, $md5_password) { global $dbcon; $ac = new ac(); $ac->dbconnect(); $userid = $dbcon->prepare('SELECT id FROM users WHERE username = :username AND password = :password LIMIT 1'); $userid->bindParam(':username', $plain_username); $userid->bindParam(':password', $md5_password); $userid->execute(); $id = $userid->fetch(); Return $id; } *EDIT:*I've even tried hard coding the username and password into the function itself to try and isolate the problem like this: private function check_credentials($plain_username, $md5_password) { global $dbcon; $plain_username = "jim"; $md5_username = "waffles"; $ac = new ac(); $ac->dbconnect(); $userid = $dbcon->prepare('SELECT id FROM users WHERE username = :username AND password = :password LIMIT 1'); $userid->bindParam(':username', $plain_username); $userid->bindParam(':password', $md5_password); $userid->execute(); print_r($dbcon->errorInfo()); $id = $userid->fetch(); Return $id; } Still nothing :-/

    Read the article

  • Is it dangerous to keep an admin page to administer your database?

    - by Scarface
    Hey guys I have an admin page that checks if you are admin before submitting any queries, and contains a header to the index page if you are not admin, but I am worried about protecting the page. I am concerned someone may be able to destroy my database with it. Does anyone have any recommendation into protecting a page like this, if not, should I just manually admin my database through phpmyadmin and delete the page all together?

    Read the article

  • How do I delete a foreign key in SQLAlchemy?

    - by Travis
    I'm using SQLAlchemy Migrate to keep track of database changes and I'm running into an issue with removing a foreign key. I have two tables, t_new is a new table, and t_exists is an existing table. I need to add t_new, then add a foreign key to t_exists. Then I need to be able to reverse the operation (which is where I'm having trouble). t_new = sa.Table("new", meta.metadata, sa.Column("new_id", sa.types.Integer, primary_key=True) ) t_exists = sa.Table("exists", meta.metadata, sa.Column("exists_id", sa.types.Integer, primary_key=True), sa.Column( "new_id", sa.types.Integer, sa.ForeignKey("new.new_id", onupdate="CASCADE", ondelete="CASCADE"), nullable=False ) ) This works fine: t_new.create() t_exists.c.new_id.create() But this does not: t_exists.c.new_id.drop() t_new.drop() Trying to drop the foreign key column gives an error: 1025, "Error on rename of '.\my_db_name\#sql-1b0_2e6' to '.\my_db_name\exists' (errno: 150)" If I do this with raw SQL, i can remove the foreign key manually then remove the column, but I haven't been able to figure out how to remove the foreign key with SQLAlchemy? How can I remove the foreign key, and then the column?

    Read the article

  • Linq for java

    - by Milhous
    Would a LINQ for java be a useful tool? I have been working on a tool that will allow a java object to map to a row in a database. Would this be useful for java programmers? What features would be useful?

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to "merge" the values of multiple records into a single field without using a stored

    - by j0rd4n
    A co-worker posed this question to me, and I told them, "No, you'll need to write a sproc for that". But I thought I'd give them a chance and put this out to the community. Essentially, they have a table with keys mapping to multiple values. For a report, they want to aggregate on the key and "mash" all of the values into a single field. Here's a visual: --- ------- Key Value --- ------- 1 A 1 B 1 C 2 X 2 Y The result would be as follows: --- ------- Key Value --- ------- 1 A,B,C 2 X,Y They need this in SQLServer 2005. Again, I think they need to write a stored procedure, but if anyone knows a magic out-of-the-box function that does this, I'd be impressed.

    Read the article

  • Google Maps - user to pinpoint a location

    - by JohnB
    Hi, Is it possible to allow users of my website to mark places on a map I display using Google Maps API? I need to then save that location coordinates to a db. I've been looking through the google maps API, I found that I can use the web service to do searches like this: http://maps.google.com/maps/geo?q=Maine,+United+States&output=json&oe=utf8\&sensor=false&key=my_key But I am not sure it's working on a house number level (which I need it to) and I'm not sure how to display a 'did you mean?' to the user when he misspells the address.. Anyone have an idea? Thanks,

    Read the article

  • PHP Variable with Array

    - by Crays
    Hi guys, i'm trying to make a "update user's power" page. It is something similar to those you can find in say, invisionfree forums. I need it to generate a list of members with checkbox [done] Add an option for it [done] What i don't know how to do is to update, to say, give all the selected users the selected power. Then i went searching for something and found most of them uses array to do this, but i never found one that actually explains how it works. The example i took (with my own modification) was this: while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)) { echo '<tr>'.$id[]=$rows['id'].''; echo '<td width="50px" align="center" class="TableFormCell"><input type="checkbox" name="option[]" /></td>'; echo '<td width="170px" align="center" class="TableFormCell">'.$row['uname'].'</td>'; echo '</tr>'; } I'm not sure what exactly $id[]=$rows['id'] does I know after the row, my option[] would become an array of option[1], option[2], option[3] for what power should be given, i've got no problem with that but on how to update the database i'm got no clue... for($i=0;$i<$count;$i++){ $sql1="UPDATE ninos SET power='$power' WHERE id='$option[$i]'"; $result1=mysql_query($sql1); } So Say i have 5 users, Aye, Bee, Cee, Dee, Eee with IDs of 1,2,3,4,5 how can i make it so that my script would run like $sql1="UPDATE ninos SET power = '$power' Where id='1','2','3','4','5'"; Please help, thanks.

    Read the article

  • What is the proper PHP syntax to post a file that exists in a directory that's on the server?

    - by ggg
    This is a basic post form in PHP that loads from the client PC. What is the proper syntax to load from a directory on the server? <form enctype="multipart/form-data" action="index.php?option=com_productionparse" method="POST"> <input type="hidden" name="MAX_FILE_SIZE" value="90000000000" /><br /> Choose a file to upload: <input name="file" size=120 type="file" /><br /> <input type="submit" value="Upload File" /> </form>

    Read the article

  • Apply a recursive CTE on grouped table rows (SQL server 2005).

    - by Evan V.
    Hi all, I have a table (ROOMUSAGE) containing the times people check in and out of rooms grouped by PERSONKEY and ROOMKEY. It looks like this: PERSONKEY | ROOMKEY | CHECKIN | CHECKOUT | ROW ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1 | 8 | 13-4-2010 10:00 | 13-4-2010 11:00 | 1 1 | 8 | 13-4-2010 08:00 | 13-4-2010 09:00 | 2 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 1 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 14:00 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 2 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 13:00 | 13-4-2010 14:00 | 3 13 | 2 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 1 13 | 2 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 2 I want to select just the consecutive rows for each PERSONKEY, ROOMKEY grouping. So the desired resulting table is: PERSONKEY | ROOMKEY | CHECKIN | CHECKOUT | ROW ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1 | 8 | 13-4-2010 10:00 | 13-4-2010 11:00 | 1 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 1 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 14:00 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 2 1 | 1 | 13-4-2010 13:00 | 13-4-2010 14:00 | 3 13 | 2 | 13-4-2010 15:00 | 13-4-2010 16:00 | 1 I want to avoid using cursors so I thought I would use a recursive CTE. Here is what I came up with: ;with CTE (PERSONKEY, ROOMKEY, CHECKIN, CHECKOUT, ROW) as (select RU.PERSONKEY, RU.ROOMKEY, RU.CHECKIN, RU.CHECKOUT, RU.ROW from ROOMUSAGE RU where RU.ROW = 1 union all select RU.PERSONKEY, RU.ROOMKEY, RU.CHECKIN, RU.CHECKOUT, RU.ROW from ROOMUSAGE RU inner join CTE on RU.ROWNUM = CTE.ROWNUM + 1 where CTE.CHECKIN = RU.CHECKOUT and CTE.PERSONKEY = RU.PERSONKEY and CTE.ROOMKEY = RU.ROOMKEY) This worked OK for very small datasets (under 100 records) but it's unusable on large datasets. I'm thinking that I should somehow apply the cte recursevely on each PERSONKEY, ROOMKEY grouping on my ROOMUSAGE table but I am not sure how to do that. Any help would be much appreciated, Cheers!

    Read the article

  • SubSonic: MySqlDataReader closes connection.

    - by SchlaWiener
    I am using SubSonic 2.1 and entcountered a problem while executing a Transaction with SharedDbConnectionScope and TransactionScope. The problem is that in the obj.Save() method I get an "The connection must be valid and open" exception I tracked down the problem to this line: // Loads a SubSonic ActiveRecord object User user = new User(User.Columns.Username, "John Doe"); in this Constructor of the User class a method "LoadParam" is called which eventually does if (rdr != null) rdr.Close(); It looks like the rdr.Close() implicitly closes my connection which is fine when using the AutomaticConnection. But during a transaction it is usally not a good idea to close the connection :-) My Question is if this is by design or if it's an error in the MySqlDataReader.

    Read the article

  • One table, need multiple values from different rows/tuples

    - by WmasterJ
    I have tables like: 'profile_values' userID | fid | value -------+---------+------- 1 | 3 | [email protected] 1 | 45 | 203-234-2345 3 | 3 | [email protected] 1 | 45 | 123-456-7890 And: 'users' userID | name -------+------- 1 | joe 2 | jane 3 | jake I want to join them and have one row with two of the values like: 'profile_values' userID | name | email | phone -------+-------+----------------+-------------- 1 | joe | [email protected] | 203-234-2345 2 | jane | [email protected] | 123-456-7890 I have solved it but it feels clumsy and I want to know if there is a better way to do it. Meaning solutions that are either more readable or faster(optimized) or simply best-practice. Current solution: multiple tables selected, many conditional statements: SELECT u.userID AS memberid, u.name AS first_name, pv1.value AS fname, pv2.value as lname FROM users AS u, profile_values AS pv1, profile_values AS pv2, WHERE u.userID = pv1.userID AND pv1.fid = 3 AND u.userID = pv2.userID AND pv2.fid = 45; Thanks for the help!

    Read the article

  • useing my own db info to replace parts of a url and open in a iframe

    - by Morpheus Lucid
    print ("http://maps.google.com/maps/api/staticmap?center=");echo $City;print (",");echo $City;print (","); echo $State;print ("&zoom=14&size=500x500&maptype=roadmap&markers=color:blue|label:S|"); echo $Latitude;print (",");echo $Longitude;print ("&sensor=false")"); when page is loaded it prints right but would like to take the results from this and put into a iframe so when page loads it shows the map of the entry

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507  | Next Page >