Search Results

Search found 34893 results on 1396 pages for 'const method'.

Page 510/1396 | < Previous Page | 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517  | Next Page >

• Unable to create unmanaged object using new keyword in managed C++

  - by chair79

  Hi all, I've created a class with a boost::unordered_map as a member, Linkage.h #ifndef LINKAGE_H #define LINKAGE_H #include <boost/unordered_map.hpp> class Linkage { private: boost::unordered_map<int, int> m_IOMap; public: .... }; Linkage.cpp #include "stdafx.h" ... // methods and in the managed side of C++, I try to create the pointer of the obj: private: System::Void Form1_Load(System::Object^ sender, System::EventArgs^ e) { Linkage* m_pLink = new Linkage(); ..... } However this produces errors: Error 4 error LNK2005: "private: static unsigned int const boost::detail::type_with_alignment_imp<4>::found" (?found@?$type_with_alignment_imp@$03@detail@boost@@$$Q0IB) already defined in Proj_Test.obj Linkage.obj ..... Error 7 fatal error LNK1169: one or more multiply defined symbols found Could anyone explain to me pls? Thanks.

  Read the article

• string manipulation without alloc mem in c

  - by Mike

  I'm wondering if there is another way of getting a sub string without allocating memory. To be more specific, I have a string as: const char *str = "9|0\" 940 Hello"; Currently I'm getting the 940, which is the sub-string I want as, char *a = strstr(str,"9|0\" "); char *b = substr(a+5, 0, 3); // gives me the 940 Where substr is my sub string procedure. The thing is that I don't want to allocate memory for this by calling the sub string procedure. Is there a much easier way?, perhaps by doing some string manipulation and not alloc mem. I'll appreciate any feedback.

  Read the article

• deleting dublicates in listview delphi

  - by radick

  hi all I am trying to remove dublicates in my listview my function like this below procedure RemoveDuplicates(const LV:TbsSkinListView); var i,j: Integer; begin LV.Items.BeginUpdate; LV.SortType := stText; try for i := 0 to LV.Items.Count-1 do begin for j:=i+1 to LV.Items.Count-1 do begin if SameText(LV.Items[i].SubItems[0], LV.Items[j].SubItems[0]) and SameText(LV.Items[i].SubItems[1], LV.Items[j].SubItems[1]) and SameText(LV.Items[i].SubItems[2], LV.Items[j].SubItems[2]) and SameText(LV.Items[i].SubItems[3], LV.Items[j].SubItems[3]) then LV.Items.Delete(j); end; end; finally LV.SortType := stNone; LV.Items.EndUpdate; end; ShowMessage('Deleted'); end; but its not doing what i intended can anyone help me ?

  Read the article

• "Temporary object" warning - is it me or the compiler?

  - by Roddy

  The following snippet gives the warning: [C++ Warning] foo.cpp(70): W8030 Temporary used for parameter '_Val' in call to 'std::vector<Base *,std::allocator<Base *> >::push_back(Base * const &)' .. on the indicated line. class Base { }; class Derived: public Base { public: Derived() // << warning disappears if constructor is removed! { }; }; std::vector<Base*> list1; list1.push_back(new Base); list1.push_back(new Derived); // << Warning on this line! Compiler is Codegear C++Builder 2007. Oddly, if the constructor for Derived is deleted, the warning goes away... Is it me or the compiler?

  Read the article

• visual studio intellisense error

  - by rakkarage

  template <typename T> class Test { friend Test<T> & operator * (T lhs, const Test<T> & rhs) { Test<T> r(rhs); // return r *= lhs; } } 4 IntelliSense: identifier "T" is undefined why is T defined on line 3 but not line 4? i mean i guess its not a real error just an intellisense error... it works anyway but is there something wrong? can i fix it? or remove the red squiggles somehow? thanks i am using visual studio 2010... i wonder if this happens in other versions as well?

  Read the article

• Casting problem cant convert from void to float C++

  - by Makenshi

  as i said i get this horrible error i dont really know what to do anymore float n= xAxis[i].Normalize(); thats where i get the error and i get it cuz normalize is a void function this is it void CVector::normalize() { float len=Magnitude(); this->x /= len; this->y /= len; } i need normalize to stay as void tho i tried normal casting like this float n= (float)xAxis[i].Normalize(); and it doesnt work also with static,dynamic cast,reinterpret,const cast and cant make it work any help would be really apreciated... thank you .<

  Read the article

• Does replacing statements by expressions using the C++ comma operator could allow more compiler opti

  - by Gabriel Cuvillier

  The C++ comma operator is used to chain individual expressions, yielding the value of the last executed expression as the result. For example the skeleton code (6 statements, 6 expressions): step1; step2; if (condition) step3; return step4; else return step5; May be rewritten to: (1 statement, 6 expressions) return step1, step2, condition? step3, step4 : step5; I noticed that it is not possible to perform step-by-step debugging of such code, as the expression chain seems to be executed as a whole. Does it means that the compiler is able to perform special optimizations which are not possible with the traditional statement approach (specially if the steps are const or inline)? Note: I'm not talking about the coding style merit of that way of expressing sequence of expressions! Just about the possible optimisations allowed by replacing statements by expressions.

  Read the article

• When do I need to deallocate memory?

  - by extintor

  I am using this code inside a class to make a webbrowser control visit a website: void myClass::visitWeb(const char *url) { WCHAR buffer[MAX_LEN]; ZeroMemory(buffer, sizeof(buffer)); MultiByteToWideChar(CP_ACP, MB_ERR_INVALID_CHARS, url, strlen(url), buffer, sizeof(buffer)-1); VARIANT vURL; vURL.vt = VT_BSTR; vURL.bstrVal = SysAllocString(buffer); // webbrowser navigate code... VariantClear(&vURL); } I call visitWeb from another void function that gets called on the handlemessage() for the app. Do I need to do some memory deallocation here?, I see vURL is being deallocated by VariantClear but should I deallocate memory for buffer? I've been told that in another bool I have in the same app I shouldn't deallocate anything because everything clear out when the bool return true/false, but what happens on this void?

  Read the article

• Get the lua command when a c function is called

  - by gamernb

  Supposed I register many different function names in Lua to the same function in C. Now, everytime my C function is called, is there a way to determine which function name was invoked? for example: int runCommand(lua_State *lua) { const char *name = // getFunctionName(lua) ? how would I do this part for(int i = 0; i < functions.size; i++) if(functions[i].name == name) functions[i].Call() } int main() { ... lua_register(lua, "delay", runCommand); lua_register(lua, "execute", runCommand); lua_register(lua, "loadPlugin", runCommand); lua_register(lua, "loadModule", runCommand); lua_register(lua, "delay", runCommand); } So, how do I get the name of what ever function called it?

  Read the article

• converting string to int in C++

  - by xbonez

  I am trying to convert a string I read in from a file to an int value so I can store it in an integer variable. This is what my code looks like: ifstream sin; sin.open("movie_output.txt"); string line; getline(sin,line); myMovie.setYear(atoi(line)); Over here, setYear is a mutator in the Movie class (myMovie is an object of Movie class) that looks like this: void Movie::setYear(unsigned int year) { year_ = year; } When I run the code, I get the following error: error C2664: 'atoi' : cannot convert parameter 1 from 'std::string' to 'const char *' 1> No user-defined-conversion operator available that can perform this conversion, or the operator cannot be called

  Read the article

• Foo f = Foo(); // no matching function for call to 'Foo::Foo(Foo)' ... huh?!

  - by Kyle

  class Foo { public: explicit Foo() {} explicit Foo(Foo&) {} }; Foo d = Foo(); error: no matching function for call to 'Foo::Foo(Foo)' I tried changing Foo(Foo&) to Foo(Foo) as the error suggests, which AFAIK is not a valid constructor, and sure enough I get: error: invalid constructor; you probably meant ‘Foo (const Foo&)’ What gives? How do I resolve this? (This is on GCC by the way)

  Read the article

• Zend Framework Custom Validation Class Error Message

  - by remlabm

  The validation fails as it should but does not return the error message. $form->addElement('text', 'phone_number', array( 'required' => true, 'validators' => array( array('NotEmpty', true, array('messages' => 'Enter a valid Phone Number')), array('regex', false, array('pattern' => '/\([0-9]{3}\)\s[0-9]{3}-[0-9]{4}/', 'messages' => 'Enter a valid Phone Number' )), 'CheckPhoneNumber'), ), )); Custom Class: class Custom_Validators_CheckPhoneNumber extends Zend_Validate_Abstract{ const IN_USE = 'inUse'; protected $_messageTemplates = array( self::IN_USE => "'%value%' is currently in use" ); public function isValid($value) { $this->_setValue($value); $user_check = Users::getActive(preg_replace("/[^0-9]/", "", $value)); if($user_check->id){ $this->_error(self::IN_USE); return false; } return true; } } Just fails does not give the "IN_USE" error.

  Read the article

• Vbscript - Object Required for DateLastModified

  - by Kenny Bones

  I don't really know what's wrong right here. I'm trying to create a vbscript that basically checks two Folders for their files and compare the DateLastModified attribute of each and then copies the source files to the destination folder if the DateLastModified of the source file is newer than the existing one. I have this code: Dim strSourceFolder, strDestFolder Dim fso, objFolder, colFiles strSourceFolder = "c:\users\user\desktop\Source\" strDestFolder = "c:\users\user\desktop\Dest\" Set fso = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject") Set objFolder = fso.GetFolder(strSourceFolder) Set colFiles = objFolder.Files For each objFile in colFiles Dim DateModified DateModified = objFile.DateLastModified ReplaceIfNewer objFile, DateModified, strSourceFolder, strDestFolder Next Sub ReplaceIfNewer (sourceFile, DateModified, SourceFolder, DestFolder) Const OVERWRITE_EXISTING = True Dim fso, objFolder, colFiles, sourceFileName, destFileName Dim DestDateModified, objDestFile Set fso = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject") sourceFileName = fso.GetFileName(sourceFile) destFileName = DestFolder & sourceFileName if fso.FileExists(destFileName) Then objDestFile = fso.GetFile(destFileName) DestDateModified = objDestFile.DateLastModified msgbox "File last modified: " & DateModified msgbox "New file last modified: " & DestDateModified End if End Sub And I get the error: On line 34, Char 3 "Object required: 'objDestFile' But objDestFile IS created?

  Read the article

• uint8_t and unsigned char linking error

  - by mnn

  I'm using template function: template<typename T> void func(const T& value) { obj->func(value); } where obj is object of class: void my_object::func(int64_t value) { ... } void my_object::func(uint64_t value) { ... } void my_object::func(uint32_t value) { ... } void my_object::func(uint16_t value) { ... } void my_object::func(uint8_t value) { ... } The problem is with uint8_t overload of my_object::func() override. Linker complains about unresolved external symbols to overloads, which should have unsigned char parameter. Should I replace uint8_t overload with unsigned char overload? Edit: Just now noticed, that linker complains about uint64_t and int64_t too. I compile on Windows using MSVC++ 2008 Express.

  Read the article

• Multiple constructors definitions with same name but different signatures (C++)

  - by PuRe_ChAoS12

  With the following code, I keep getting error C2535 when I compile. It's complaining that a member function already defined or declared. Rationnel.h ... class Rationnel { public: Rationnel(int); //Constructor Rationnel(int,int); //Constructor void add(const Rationnel); ... Rationnel.cpp ... //Constructor Rationnel::Rationnel(int n = 1) { numerateur = n; denominateur = 1; } //Constructor Rationnel::Rationnel(int n = 1, int d = 1) { numerateur = n; denominateur = d; } ... Any idea what could be causing the error? Thanks for your time.

  Read the article

• Sql inline query with parameters. Parameter is not read when the query is executed.

  - by fzshah76

  Hi All: I am having a problem with my sql query in c#, basically it's inline query with parameters, but when I run it it tells me that parameter 1 or parameter 2 is not there here is my query declared on top of the page as public: public const string InsertStmtUsersTable = "insert into Users (username, password, email, userTypeID, memberID, CM7Register) " + "Values(@username, @password, @email, @userTypeID, @memberID,@CM7Register ); select @@identity"; this is my code for assigning the parameters, I know I am having problem so I am assigning the params twice: Username =(cmd.Parameters["@username"].Value = row["username"].ToString()) as string; cmd.Parameters["@username"].Value = row["username"].ToString(); In 1 methopd it calls this query and tries to insert to table, here is the code: Result = Convert.ToInt32(SqlHelper.ExecuteScalar(con, CommandType.Text,InsertStmtUsersTable)); Exact error message is: Must declare the variable '@username'.

  Read the article

• Multiplying complex with constant in C++

  - by Atilla Filiz

  The following code fails to compile #include <iostream> #include <cmath> #include <complex> using namespace std; int main(void) { const double b=3; complex <double> i(0, 1), comp; comp = b*i; comp=3*i; return 0; } with error: no match for ‘operator*’ in ‘3 * i’ What is wrong here, why cannot I multiply with immediate constants?

  Read the article

• use callback function to report stack backtrace

  - by user353394

  Assume I have the following: typedef struct { char *name; char binding; int address; } Fn_Symbol //definition of function symbol static Fn_Symbol *fnSymbols; //array of function symbols in a file statc int total; //number of symbol functions in the array and file static void PrintBacktrace(int sigum, siginfo_t * siginfo, void *context) { printf("\nSignal received %d (%s)\n", signum, strsignal(signum)); const int eip_index = 14; void *eip = (void *)((struct ucontext *)context)->uc_mcontext.gregs[eip_index]; printf("Error at [%p] %s (+0x%x), eip, fnName, offset from start); //????? exit(0); } I have this so far, but what is the best way using the fnSymbols static global pointer to identify the function where the error occured and then back trace through the stack to identify each calling function by address, name, and offset?

  Read the article

• How to 'hide' spurious "declared but never used" warnings?

  - by Roddy

  I'm using the C++Builder compiler which has a minor bug that certain static const items from system header files can cause spurious "xyzzy is declared but never used" warnings. I'm trying to get my code 100% warning free, so want a way of masking these particular warnings (note - but not by simply turning off the warning!) Also, I can't modify the header files. I need a way of 'faking' the use of the items, preferably without even knowing their type. As an example, adding this function to my .cpp modules fixes warnings for these four items, but it seems a bit 'ad-hoc'. Is there a better and preferably self-documenting way of doing this? static int fakeUse() { return OneHour + OneMinute + OneSecond + OneMillisecond; }

  Read the article

• Determine if a string contains only alphanumeric characters (or a space)

  - by dreamlax

  I'm learning C++ and I am writing a function that determines whether a string contains only alphanumeric characters and spaces. I suppose I am effectively testing whether it matches the regular expression ^[[:alnum:] ]+$ but without using regular expressions. I have seen a lot of algorithms revolve around iterators, so I tried to find a solution that made use of iterators, and this is what I have: #include <algorithm> static inline bool is_not_alnum_space(char c) { return !(isalpha(c) || isdigit(c) || (c == ' ')); } bool string_is_valid(const std::string &str) { return find_if(str.begin(), str.end(), is_not_alnum_space) == str.end(); } Is there a better solution, or a “more C++” way to do this?

  Read the article

• Avoiding "variable might not have been initialized"

  - by Mason Wheeler

  I recently ran across a routine that looks something like this: procedure TMyForm.DoSomething(list: TList<TMyObject>; const flag: boolean); var local: integer; begin if flag then //do something else local := ExpensiveFunctionCallThatCalculatesSomething; //do something else for i := 0 to list.Count do if flag then //do something else if list[i].IntValue > local then //WARNING HERE //do something else end; This gives Variable 'local' might not have been initialized even though you can tell by reading the code that you won't hit that line unless the code branch that initializes it has run. Now, I could get rid of this warning by adding a useless local := 0; at the top of the procedure, but I wonder if there might not be a better way to structure this to avoid the issue. Anyone have any ideas?

  Read the article

• read out a txt and send the last line to email adress - vbscript

  - by matthias

  Hallo, I'm back haha :-) so i have the next question and i hope someone can help me... I know i have a lot of questions but i will try to learn vbscript :-) Situation: I try to make a program that check all 5 min a txt and if there a new line in the txt, i'll try to send it to my eMail Address Option Explicit Dim fso, WshShell, Text, Last, objEmail Const folder = "C:\test.txt" Set fso=CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject") Set WshShell = WScript.CreateObject("WScript.Shell") Do Text = Split(fso.OpenTextFile(Datei, 1).ReadAll, vbCrLF) Letzte = Text(UBound(Text)) Set objEmail = CreateObject("CDO.Message") objEmail.From = "[email protected]" objEmail.To = "[email protected]" objEmail.Subject = "Control" objEmail.Textbody = Last objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _ ("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/sendusing") = 2 objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _ ("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpserver") = _ "smtpip" objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _ ("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpserverport") = 25 objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Update objEmail.Send WScript.Sleep 300000 Loop This program works, but this program send me all 5 mins a mail...but i will only have a new mail when there is a new line in the txt. Can someone help me?

  Read the article

• CImg compile problems in Codegear 2009

  - by Seth

  I wish to use the CImg library for image processing in my current project. I am using Codegear C++ Builder 2009. I include CImg.h in the source file and put in the following code: int rows =5; int cols = 5; CImg<double> img(rows,cols); I get the following error: [BCC32 Error] CImg.h(39159): E2285 Could not find a match for 'CImg<unsigned char>::move_to<t>(const CImg<unsigned char>)' Does anyone know if there is a #define I should be using when building in Codegear C++ Builder 2009. Or is it simply not compatible?

  Read the article

• Why won't C++ allow this default value

  - by nieldw

  Why won't GCC allow a default parameter here? template<class edgeDecor, class vertexDecor, bool dir> Graph<edgeDecor,int,dir> Graph<edgeDecor,vertexDecor,dir>::Dijkstra(vertex s, bool print = false) const { This is the output I get: graph.h:82: error: default argument given for parameter 2 of ‘Graph<edgeDecor, int, dir> Graph<edgeDecor, vertexDecor, dir>::Dijkstra(Vertex<edgeDecor, vertexDecor, dir>, bool)’ graph.h:36: error: after previous specification in ‘Graph<edgeDecor, int, dir> Graph<edgeDecor, vertexDecor, dir>::Dijkstra(Vertex<edgeDecor, vertexDecor, dir>, bool)’ Can anyone see why I'm getting this?

  Read the article

• how to copy char * into a string and visa versa

  - by user295030

  If i pass a char * into a function. I want to then take that char * convert it to a std::string and once I get my result convert it back to char * from a std::string to show the result. I don't know how to do this for conversion ( I am not talking const char * but just char *) I am not sure how to manipulate the value of the pointer I send in. so steps i need to do take in a char * convert it into a string. take the result of that string and put it back in the form of a char * return the result such that the value should be available outside the function and not get destroyed. If possible can i see how it could be done via reference vs a pointer (whose address I pass in by value however I can still modify the value that pointer is pointing to. so even though the copy of the pointer address in the function gets destroyed i still see the changed value outside. thanks!

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517  | Next Page >