Search Results

Search found 57907 results on 2317 pages for 'database access'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 515/2317 | < Previous Page | 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522  | Next Page >

  • What will happen if I change the type of a column from int to year?

    - by MachinationX
    I have a table in MySQL 4.0 which currently has a year field as a smallint(6) type. What will happen if I convert it directly to a Year type with a query like the following: ALTER TABLE t MODIFY y YEAR(4) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP; When the current members of column y have values like 2010? I assume that because the year type is technically values from 1-255, values above that will be truncated or broken. So if MySQL isn't smart enough to realize that 2010(int) = 110(year), what would be the simplest query or queries to convert the values? Thanks for your help!

    Read the article

  • Is this safe? Is this OK to do in MYSQL?

    - by alex
    I have always done this: mysqldump -hlocalhost -uuser -ppass MYDATABASE > /home/f/db_backup/MYDATABASE.sql mysql -uuser -ppass MYDATABASE < MYDATABASE.sql But, if I do this instead...is this safe? Is this identical to the above??? mysqldump -hlocalhost -uuser -ppass MYDATABASE | gzip > /home/f/db_backup/MYDATABASE.sql.gz zcat MYDATABASE.sql.gz | mysql -uuser -ppass MYDATABASE

    Read the article

  • Beginner having difficulty with SQL query

    - by Vulcanizer
    Hi, I've been studying SQL for 2 weeks now and I'm preparing for an SQL test. Anyway I'm trying to do this question: For the table: 1 create table data { 2 id int, 3 n1 int not null, 4 n2 int not null, 5 n3 int not null, 6 n4 int not null, 7 primary key (id) 8 } I need to return the relation with tuples (n1, n2, n3) where all the corresponding values for n4 are 0. The problem asks me to solve it WITHOUT using subqueries(nested selects/views) It also gives me an example table and the expected output from my query: 01 insert into data (id, n1, n2, n3, n4) 02 values (1, 2,4,7,0), 03 (2, 2,4,7,0), 04 (3, 3,6,9,8), 05 (4, 1,1,2,1), 06 (5, 1,1,2,0), 07 (6, 1,1,2,0), 08 (7, 5,3,8,0), 09 (8, 5,3,8,0), 10 (9, 5,3,8,0); expects (2,4,7) (5,3,8) and not (1,1,2) since that has a 1 in n4 in one of the cases. The best I could come up with was: 1 SELECT DISTINCT n1, n2, n3 2 FROM data a, data b 3 WHERE a.ID <> b.ID 4 AND a.n1 = b.n1 5 AND a.n2 = b.n2 6 AND a.n3 = b.n3 7 AND a.n4 = b.n4 8 AND a.n4 = 0 but I found out that also prints (1,1,2) since in the example (1,1,2,0) happens twice from IDs 5 and 6. Any suggestions would be really appreciated.

    Read the article

  • About curse of dimensionality

    - by Dan
    My question is about this topic I've been reading about a bit. Basically my understanding is that in higher dimensions all points end up being very close to each other. The doubt I have is whether this means that calculating distances the usual way (euclidean for instance) is valid or not. If it were still valid, this would mean that when comparing vectors in high dimensions, the two most similar wouldn't differ much from a third one even when this third one could be completely unrelated. Is this correct? Then in this case, how would you be able to tell whether you have a match or not?

    Read the article

  • Any way to make this PostgreSQL count query any faster?

    - by Ben Dauphinee
    I'm running a case-insensitive search on a table with 7.2 million rows, and I was wondering if there was any way to make this query any faster? Currently, it takes approx 11.6 seconds to execute, with just one search parameter, and I'm worried that as soon as I add more than one, this query will become massively slow. SELECT count(*) FROM "exif_parse" WHERE (description ~* 'canon')

    Read the article

  • db optimization - have a total field or query table?

    - by Dorian Fife
    I have an app where users get points for actions they perform - either 1 point for an easy action or 2 for a difficult one. I wish to display to the user the total number of points he got in my app and the points obtained this week (since Monday at midnight). I have a table that records all actions, along with their time and number of points. I have two alternatives and I'm not sure which is better: Every time the user sees the report perform a query and sum the points the user got Add two fields to each user that records the number of points obtained so far (total and weekly). The weekly points value will be set to 0 every Monday at midnight. The first option is easier, but I'm afraid that as I'll get many users and actions queries will take a long time. The second option bares the risk of inconsistency between the table of actions and the summary values. I'm very interested in what you think is the best alternative here. Thanks, Dorian

    Read the article

  • How to translate this query:

    - by xRobot
    How can I translate this 2 queries in postgresql ? : . CREATE TABLE example ( id int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment, from varchar(255) NOT NULL default '0', message text NOT NULL, lastactivity timestamp NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00', read int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id), KEY from (from) ) DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; . SELECT * FROM table_1 LEFT OUTER JOIN table_2 ON ( table_1.id = table_2.id ) WHERE (table_1.lastactivity > NOW()-100);

    Read the article

  • How to translate this 2 queries from Mysql to Postgresql? :

    - by xRobot
    How can I translate this 2 queries in postgresql ? : CREATE TABLE `example` ( `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment, `from` varchar(255) NOT NULL default '0', `message` text NOT NULL, `lastactivity` timestamp NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00', `read` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`), KEY `from` (`from`) ) DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; Query: SELECT * FROM table_1 LEFT OUTER JOIN table_2 ON ( table_1.id = table_2.id ) WHERE (table_1.lastactivity > NOW()-100);

    Read the article

  • Table naming convention?

    - by MattSlay
    In our manufacturing shop, each Employee hits the time clock every time they change Jobs or Machines (work centers) during their work day. Each record created in the Time Clock app has foreign keys that link the record to: the Employee, the Job, and the Machine which they are about to operate. I’m trying to determine the best name for this table… If I were tempted to call it ClockRecords or TimeClockRecords, why wouldn’t I also consider naming it JobTimeRecords, or why not MachineTimeRecords. Any ideas on a good name?

    Read the article

  • Static selection and Ruby on Rails objects

    - by Dave
    Hi all- I have a simple problem, but am having trouble wrapping my head around it. I have an video object that should have one or more "genres". This list of genres should be prepopulated and then the user should just select one or more using autocomplete or some such. Here is the question: Is it worth creating a table with genres for the static selection? Or should it just be included in the presentation layer? If there is a static table, how do we name it correctly. I envision something like this class Video < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :genres ... end class Genre < ... belongs_to :video ... end But then we get a table called genre, that basically maps all the selected genres to their parent videos. There would need to be some static table to reference the static genres. Is this the best way to do it? Sorry if this was rambl-y a little stream of conciousness. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Using SQL Server for web applications

    - by rem
    As far as I understand, due to license reqirements all web applications, which use MS SQL Server, use SQL Server Express (free) or SQL Server web edition (processor license). Is it so? What are other specific features of SQL Server usage for web app?

    Read the article

  • How to handle ids and polymorphic associations in views if compound keys are not supported?

    - by duncan
    I have a Movie plan table: movie_plans (id, description) Each plan has items, which describe a sequence of movies and the duration in minutes: movie_plan_items (id, movie_plan_id, movie_id, start_minutes, end_minutes) A specific instance of that plan happens in: movie_schedules (id, movie_plan_id, start_at) However the schedule items can be calculated from the movie_plan_items and the schedule start time by adding the minutes create view movie_schedule_items as select CONCAT(p.id, '-', s.id) as id, s.id as movie_schedule_id, p.id as movie_plan_item_id, p.movie_id, p.movie_plan_id, (s.start_at + INTERVAL p.start_minutes MINUTE) as start_at, (s.start_at + INTERVAL p.end_minutes MINUTE) as end_at from movie_plan_items p, movie_schedules s where s.movie_plan_id=p.movie_plan_id; I have a model over this view (readonly), it works ok, except that the id is right now a string. I now want to add a polymorphic property (like comments) to various of the previous tables. Therefore for movie_schedule_items I need a unique and persistent numeric id. I have the following dilemma: I could avoid the id and have movie_schedule_items just use the movie_plan_id and movie_schedule_id as a compound key, as it should. But Rails sucks in this regard. I could create an id using String#hash or a md5, thus making it slower or collision prone (and IIRC String#hash is no longer persistent across processes in Ruby 1.9) Any ideas on how to handle this situation?

    Read the article

  • How can an improvement to the query cache be tracked?

    - by Bill Paetzke
    I am parameterizing my web app's ad hoc sql. As a result, I expect the query plan cache to reduce in size and have a higher hit ratio. Perhaps even other important metrics will be improved. Could I use perfmon to track this? If so, what counters should I use? If not perfmon, how could I report on the impact of this change?

    Read the article

  • how to get result from this data.

    - by Shantanu Gupta
    I want to compute result from this table. I want quantity 1 - quantity2 as another column in the table shown below. this table has more such records I am trying to query but not been able to get result. select * from v order by is_active desc, transaction_id desc PK_GUEST_ITEM_ID FK_GUEST_ID QUANTITY TRANSACTION_ID IS_ACTIVE ---------------- -------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ----------- 12963 559 82000 795 1 12988 559 79000 794 0 12987 559 76000 793 0 12986 559 73000 792 0 12985 559 70000 791 0 12984 559 67000 790 0 12983 559 64000 789 0 12982 559 61000 788 0 12981 559 58000 787 0 12980 559 55000 786 0 12979 559 52000 785 0 12978 559 49000 784 0 12977 559 46000 783 0 12976 559 43000 782 0 I want another column that will contain the subtraction of two quantities . DESIRED RESULT SHOULD BE SOMETHING LIKE THIS PK_GUEST_ITEM_ID FK_GUEST_ID QUANTITY Result TRANSACTION_ID IS_ACTIVE ---------------- -------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ----------- 12963 559 82000 3000 795 1 12988 559 79000 3000 794 0 12987 559 76000 3000 793 0 12986 559 73000 3000 792 0 12985 559 70000 3000 791 0 12984 559 67000 3000 790 0 12983 559 64000 3000 789 0 12982 559 61000 3000 788 0 12981 559 58000 3000 787 0 12980 559 55000 3000 786 0 12979 559 52000 3000 785 0 12978 559 49000 3000 784 0 12977 559 46000 3000 783 0 12976 559 43000 NULL 782 0

    Read the article

  • Multiple column foreign key contraints

    - by eugene4968
    I want to setup table constraints for the following scenario and I’m not sure how to do it or if it’s even possible in SQL Server 2005. I have three tables A,B,C. C is a child of B. B will have a optional foreign key(may be null) referencing A. For performance reasons I also want table C to have the same foreign key reference to table A. The constraint on table C should be that C must reference its parent (B) and also have the same foreign key reference to A as its parent. Anyone have any thoughts on how to do this?

    Read the article

  • mysql query to get unique value from one column

    - by vesselyp
    i have a table named locations of which i want to select and get values in such a way that it should select only distinct values from a column but select all other values . table name: locations column names 1: country values : America, India, India, India column names 2: state/Province : Newyork, Punjab, Karnataka, kerala when i select i should get India only once and all the three states listed under India . is ther any way..??? sombody please help

    Read the article

  • MSSQL. Compare columns in two tables.

    - by maxt3r
    Hi, i've recently done a migration from a really old version of some application to the current version and i faced some problems while migrating databases. I need a query that could help me to compare columns in two tables. I mean not the data in rows, i need to compare the columns itself to figure out, what changes in table structure i've missed.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522  | Next Page >