Search Results

Search found 40226 results on 1610 pages for 'object relational model'.

Page 535/1610 | < Previous Page | 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542  | Next Page >

  • Sort ArrayList of custom Objects by property

    - by Samuel
    Hello World!! :D I had a question which is pretty easy if you know the answer I guess. I read about sorting ArrayLists using a Comparator but somehow in all of the examples people used compareTo which according to some research is a method working on Strings... I wanted to sort an ArrayList of custom objects by one of their properties: a Date object (getStartDay()). Normally I compare them by item1.getStartDate().before(item2.getStartDate()) so I was wondering whether I could write something like: public class customComparator { public boolean compare(Object object1, Object object2) { return object1.getStartDate().before(object2.getStartDate()); } } public class randomName { ... Collections.sort(Database.arrayList, new customComparator); ... } I just started with Java so please forgive my ignorance :) Thanks in advance!! -Samuel

    Read the article

  • Select a subset of foreign key elements in inlineformset_factory in Django

    - by Enis Afgan
    Hello, I have a model with two foreign keys: class Model1(models.Model): model_a = models.ForeignKey(ModelA) model_b = models.ForeignKey(ModelB) value = models.IntegerField() Then, I create an inline formset class, like so: an_inline_formset = inlineformset_factory(ModelA, Model1, fk_name="model_a") and then instantiate it, like so: a_formset = an_inline_formset(request.POST, instance=model_A_object) Once this formset gets rendered in a template/page, there is ChoiceField associated with the model_b field. The problem I'm having is that the elements in the resulting drop down menu include all of the elements found in ModelB table. I need to select a subset of those based on some criteria from ModelB. At the same time, I need to keep the reference to the instance of model_A_object when instantiating inlineformset_factory and, therefore, I can't just use this example. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Linq help using "Contains"

    - by Kettenbach
    Good Morning All, I'm trying to use "Contains" to see if an object is within the collection. When I break I can see that the object is indeed part of the collection however "Contains" seems to be returning false indicating the item is not in the collection. Any idea what I'm doing wrong? if(HttpContext.Current.Session["AutoPayTypes"] != null) { var autopays = HttpContext.Current.Session["AutoPayTypes"] as List<PaymentTypeInfo>; char? coverageProductLine = null; if(entityProps.ContainsKey("CoverageProductLine")) { coverageProductLine = (char?)entityProps["CoverageProductLine"]; } var paymentTypeInfoRepository = new PaymentTypeInfoRepository(); var payType = paymentTypeInfoRepository.GetPaymentTypeInfo(paymentAdd.PayType, coverageProductLine); if (autopays != null && payType != null) paymentAdd.DaysPaid = autopays.Contains(payType) ? null : paymentAdd.DaysPaid; } If the object is not in the collection the "DaysPaid" needs to be null. Any ideas? Thanks, ~ck in San Diego

    Read the article

  • Which method of creating javascript objects is better?

    - by Germaine
    I've seen objects defined in two different ways, which function similarly, but are, of course, fundamentally different. You can do it either like this: var myobject = {property: 'hello', act: function() { this.property += ' world'; }}; and like this: function myobject() { this.property = 'hello'; this.act = function() { this.property += 'world'; } } The second method could create objects like so var newobj = new myobject(); but you could do something similar using the first notation by making the object the return value of a function. The new keyword has the advantage of being able to pass parameters that can be used to initialize the properties of the object, but you could just as easily add an init function to the first kind of object. Just wondering if besides these two differences, if there was a fundamental difference that made one method definitely better than the other method.

    Read the article

  • Where does the ObjectDataSource cache data?

    - by Jeremy
    I'm considering using an ObjectDataSource as an intermediate between my page controls and my data access layer & object model. Traditionally I have manually created the object and populate it via a series of findcontrol statements when I need to insert/update data in the database. I'm hoping that I can use the ObjectDataSource to marshal data between my object and my controls, eliminating that manual code, as long as the ObjectDataSource doesn't come with a lot of overhead. I noticed the EnableCaching property, where does the caching occure? is it in view state?

    Read the article

  • Confused as to how to validate spring mvc form, what are my options?

    - by Blankman
    Latest spring mvc, using freemarker. Hoping someone could tell me what my options are in terms of validating a form with spring mvc, and what the recommend way would be to do this. I have a form that doesn't map directly to a model, it has input fields that when posted, will be used to initialze 2 model objects which I will then need to validate, and if they pass I will save them. If they fail, I want to return back to the form, pre-fill the values with what the user entered and display the error messages. I have read here and there about 2 methods, once of which I have done and understand how it works: @RequestMapping(...., method = RequestMethod.POST) public ModelAndView myMethod(@Valid MyModel, BindingResult bindingResult) { ModelAndView mav = new ModelAndView("some/view"); mav.addObject("mymodel", myModel); if(bindingResult.hasErrors()) { return mav; } } Now this worked if my form mapped directly to the form, but in my situation I have: form fields that don't map to any specific model, they have a few properties from 2 models. before validation occurrs, I need to create the 2 models manually, set the values from the values from the form, and manually set some properties also: Call validate on both models (model1, model2), and append these error messages to the errors collection which I need to pass back to the same view page if things don't work. when the form posts, I have to do some database calls, and based on those results may need to add additional messages to the errors collection Can someone tell me how to do this sort of validation? Pseudo code below: Model1 model1 = new Model1(); Model2 model2 = new Model2(); // manually or somehow automatically set the posted form values to model1 and model2. // set some fields manually, not from posted form model1.setProperty10(GlobalSettings.getDefaultProperty10()); model2.setProperty11(GlobalSettings.getDefaultProperty11()); // db calls, if they fail, add to errors collection if(bindingResult.hasErrors()) { return mav; } // validation passed, save Model1Service.save(model1); Model2Service.save(model2); redirect to another view Update I have using the JSR 303 annotations on my models right now, and it would great if I can use those still. Update II Please read the bounty description below for a summary of what I am looking for.

    Read the article

  • Storing entity in XML, using MVVM to read/write in WPF Application

    - by Christian
    Say I've a class (model) called Instance with Properties DatbaseHostname, AccessManagerHostname, DatabaseUsername and DatabasePassword public class Instance { private string _DatabaseHostname; public string DatabaseHostname { get { return _DatabaseHostname; } set { _DatabaseHostname = value; } } private string _AccessManagerHostname; public string AccessManagerHostname { get { return _AccessManagerHostname; } set { _AccessManagerHostname = value; } } private string _DatabaseUsername; public string DatabaseUsername { get { return _DatabaseUsername; } set { _DatabaseUsername = value; } } private string _DatabasePassword; public string DatabasePassword { get { return _DatabasePassword; } set { _DatabasePassword = value; } } } I'm looking for a sample code to read/write this Model to XML (preferably linq2XML) = storing 1:n instances in XML. i can manage the the view and ViewModel part myself, although it would be nice if someone had a sample of that part too..

    Read the article

  • How can I exceed the 60% Memory Limit of IIS7 in ASP.NET Caching application

    - by evilknot
    Pardon if this is more serverfault vs. stackoverflow. It seems to be on the border. We have an application that caches a large amount of product data for an e-commerce application using ASP.NET caching. This is a dictionary object with 65K elements, and our calculations put the object's size at ~10GB. Problem: The amount of memory the object consumes seems to be far in excess of our 10GB calculation. BIGGEST CONCERN: We can't seem to use over 60% of the 32GB in the server. What we've tried so far: In machine.config/system.web (sf doesn't allow the tags, pardon the formatting): processModel autoConfig="true" memoryLimit="80" In web.config/system.web/caching/cache (sf doesn't allow the tags, pardon the formatting): privateBytesLimit = "20000000000" (and 0, the default of course) percentagePhysicalMemoryUsedLimit = "90" Environment: Windows 2008R2 x64 32GB RAM IIS7 Nothing seems to allow us to exceed the 60% value. See screenshot of taskman. http://www.freeimagehosting.net/image.php?7a42144e03.jpg

    Read the article

  • Accessing the constructor by using Reflection

    - by Md. Rashim Uddin
    Assume the class is public and and the constructor is internal like as Public class A { private string text; internal A(string submittedText); public string StrText { get; } } In this case how could I Access the constructor by using Reflection. What I have done so far Type[] pTypes = new Type[1]; pTypes[0] = typeof(object); object[] argList = new object[1]; argList[0] = "Some Text"; ConstructorInfo c = typeof(A).GetConstructor (BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance, null, pTypes, null); A foo = (A)c.Invoke(BindingFlags.NonPublic, null, argList, Application.CurrentCulture); But it shows an error. Any Suggestions

    Read the article

  • Jruby embedded modules and classes.

    - by James Moore
    Hey, I have a ruby file as follows: module Example class Myclass def t_st "Hello World!" end end end now if this was just a class I would be able to use the following java code: ScriptEngine jruby = new ScriptEngineManager().getEngineByName("jruby"); jruby.eval(new BufferedReader(new FileReader("example.rb"))); Object example = jruby.eval("myclass.new"); However, this class rests inside a module. Calling the same code as above produces the error: Exception in thread "main" org.jruby.embed.EvalFailedException: uninitialized constant myclass In addition, calling: Object example = jruby.eval("Example"); The module returns no error. So one would assume this follows the format for Ruby. Object example = jruby.eval("Example::myclass.new"); Again however, I get the same error as before. Can anyone help? As there is little documentation on JRuby? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Validate a belongs to association in a build situation.

    - by Victor Martins
    I have a Mission model that has_many Task, and the Task belongs_to Mission For security I've made this validation on the Task Model: validates_presence_of :mission_id validates_numericality_of :mission_id But the problem is that when create a Mission and add tasks like this: @mission.tasks.build The validation returns error, because the mission id on the task is null ( the mission wasn't yet created ) If I delete the validation, the Mission and Task is created successfuly, but how can I keep the validation and still have this work? I could do a callback after the save, but I don't think that's right, because I don't want to save Tasks without a mission_id. P.S. I'm hidding my mission field on the form. If I have it visible, it will show the currect mission and everything is ok. But if I hidde it the error happens. <%= f.hidden_field :mission, :label => "Missão" %> Is the form reseting the attributes given by the controller on the new action?

    Read the article

  • Do Scala and Erlang use green threads?

    - by CHAPa
    I've been reading a lot about how Scala and Erlang does lightweight threads and their concurrency model (actors). However, I have my doubts. Do Scala and Erlang use an approach similar to the old thread model used by Java (green threads) ? For example, suppose that there is a machine with 2 cores, so the Scala/Erlang environment will fork one thread per processor? The other threads will be scheduled by user-space (Scala VM / Erlang VM ) environment. Is this correct? Under the hood, how does this really work?

    Read the article

  • What is node.js?

    - by Jeffrey
    I don't fully get what node.js is all about. Maybe it's because I am mainly a web based business app developer. Can someone please explain what it is and the use of it? Thanks. My understanding so far is that: The programming model is event driven, especially the way it handles IO. It uses javascript and the parser is V8. It can be easily used to create concurrent server apps. Are my understandings correct? If yes, then what are the benefits of evented IO, is it just more for the concurrency stuffs? Also is the direction of node.js to become a framework like, javascript based (v8 based) programming model?

    Read the article

  • LLBLGenProDataSource : cannot see updates values of newly inserted item from a FormView

    - by tbone
    After performing a FormView.InsertItem, I am unable to read the new values from the bound object within the LLBLGenProDataSource that the FormView is bound to. I have tracing turned on, I can see the insert happen, and the data does make it into the database, yet when I examine the contents of LLBLGenProDataSource.EntityCollection(0) (there is only one item in the collection) I do not see the values from the FormView.....yet, they are somehow being inserted into the database. Relevant code: <llblgenpro:LLBLGenProDataSource ID="llbDataSource" runat="server" MaxNumberOfItemsToReturn="1" DataContainerType="EntityCollection" EntityCollectionTypeName="Domain.CollectionClasses.MetricCollection, Domain" LivePersistence="True" ThrowExceptionOnIllegalFieldInput="true" /> Private Sub frmEdit_ItemCreated(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles frmEdit.ItemCreated If Me.llbDataSource.EntityCollection.Count = 0 Then Me.frmEdit.ChangeMode(FormViewMode.Insert) Me.llbDataSource.EntityCollection.Add(New MetricEntity) Me.frmEdit.DataBind() Else LoadDropdowns() End If End Sub Private Sub cmdSave_Click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles cmdSave.Click If Me.frmEdit.CurrentMode = FormViewMode.Edit Then Me.frmEdit.UpdateItem(False) ElseIf Me.frmEdit.CurrentMode = FormViewMode.Insert Then Me.frmEdit.InsertItem(False) 'Me.llbDataSource.DataBind() 'NOPE! Response.Redirect("~/MetricDetail.aspx?MetricCode=" & Me.llbDataSource.EntityCollection(0).Fields("MetricCode").CurrentValue.ToString) End If End Sub

    Read the article

  • IoC and Design Time

    - by benPearce
    I have a WPF application which I am using to learn MVVM and IoC. The problem is that the Model used by one of the Views expects to pull one of its dependancies in the constructor from an IoC container. When working on this View in the Visual Studio designer it cannot show the design because an exception is being raised in the model. Is there a way around this? Am I pulling my dependancies in the wrong place in code or is there a way I can pass in constructed dependancies, perhaps through Constructor injection. At present the IoC container is setup in code in App.xaml.cs. The IoC container is a roll-your-own taken from this article on MSDN - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc337885.aspx

    Read the article

  • How to get the client ip address in ASP.Net MVC?

    - by melaos
    hi guys, i'm totally new to the asp.net mvc stack and i was wondering what happened to the simple Page object and the Request ServerVariables object? basically what i wanted to do is to pull out the client's pc ip address. but i fail to understand how the current MVC structure has changed all of this. as far as i can understand, most of the variable object has been replaced by the HttpRequest variants? anybody care to share some resources? really a sea of stuff to learn in the asp.net mvc world :) thanks.

    Read the article

  • Create a string with the result of an expression and the expression that originated the value. Is it

    - by Oscar Reyes
    Like String r = SomeThing.toExecString("new Object().toString()"); And when executed the value of r would be: "new Object().toString() = java.lang.Object@c5e3974" Is this even possible at all? Would it need a bunch of reflection? A built in compiler maybe? AFAIK, this is not possible with regular Java. The closest thing I could get is IDE support like in IDEA with the "macro" soutv+tab that prints: Hit taband type the expression The IDE types the rest for you. But that's quite another completely thing.

    Read the article

  • Winforms application hangs when switching to another app

    - by joseluisrod
    Hi, I believe I have a potential threading issue. I have a user control that contains the following code: private void btnVerify_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { if (!backgroundWorkerVerify.IsBusy) { backgroundWorkerVerify.RunWorkerAsync(); } } private void backgroundWorkerVerify_DoWork(object sender, System.ComponentModel.DoWorkEventArgs e) { VerifyAppointments(); } private void backgroundWorkerVerify_RunWorkerCompleted(object sender, System.ComponentModel.RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e) { MessageBox.Show("Information was Verified.", "Verify", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Information); CloseEvent(); } vanilla code. but the issue I have is that when the application is running and the users tabs to another application when they return to mine the application is hung, they get a blank screen and they have to kill it. This started when I put the threading code. Could I have some rogue threads out there? what is the best way to zero in a threading problem? The issue can't be recreated on my machine...I know I must be missing something on how to dispose of a backgroundworker properly. Any thoughts are appreciated, Thanks, Jose

    Read the article

  • Rails 2.3 - Storing sessions in different schema

    - by sa125
    Hi - I want to config my app to use a different schema than the default for storing sessions. Basically, I want the app to store all its active_record objects in app_development and only its sessions in app_sessions. Normally this could be done by defining the sessions db in database.yml: development: # ... sessions: host: localhost database: app_sessions username: blah password: sssshhh #.... And then setting in the model: class Session < ActiveRecord::Base establish_connection :sessions #... end But since session doesn't have a model class defined, I'm looking for a way to tell it where to store its data. I've noticed the session comes from ActionController::Session, but couldn't find what I needed there. Any thoughts? thanks.

    Read the article

  • How does Entity Framework 4.0 determine which parameters are required for the factory method of an e

    - by Scott Davies
    Hi, I am working with Entity Framework 4.0 (VS 2010 Beta 2, NOT RC). I can model the EDM and produce the required database. When I ask VS to generate the code for the model, it generates the expected .designer.cs file. When I look at the factory methods for each entity that the designer has generated, I've noticed that it doesn't include all of the properties of the entity. Is it correct to say that the factory method only includes properties that cannot be null ? This appears to be the case, but I'm not entirely sure. Thanks, Scott

    Read the article

  • Merge entries in CakePHP

    - by Andrea
    Let's say I have a Model, for example User, and I want to merge two instances of this Model, say merge User2 into User1. Explicitly this is what I mean: If a field is already filled in User1, it should remain the same If a field is missing in User1 but is present in User2, it should be copied If SomeModel BelongsTo User, every instance of SomeModel pointing to User2 should be modified to point to User1 Same if SomeModel HasAndBelongsToMany User If SomeModel HasMany User, and SomeModel1 Has User2 but no other instance Has User1, it should be modified so that SomeModel1 has User1 instead If SomeModel HasMany User, SomeModel1 Has User1 and SomeModel2 Has User2... well, I'm not sure here, I guess the only solution is to discard SomeModel2, since User1 can BelongTo only one SomeModel. Finally User2 should be removed. Is there a way to automate this? Maybe a Behaviour? If not, I may consider creating it, since I will need it a lot.

    Read the article

  • How to combine mvc2 client side validation with other client side validation?

    - by Andrey
    I have a page using mvc2 with client side validation. The client side validation is provided by Microsoft Ajax mvc validation script. This does very well to validate all fields that are related to the model. I also have fields that are never sent to the server such as the confirm password value, and the accept agreement. For these fields i need pure client side validation. I created the javascript to do this, but am now having a hard time integrating the two validatiosn together. I was hoping that i could do something like add another error to an array, or set the page manually to not valid to make sure that the user cannot submit. Basically follow the same approach that i would with normal asp.net validation. I can't find anything like that. In all examples validators are discussed that are connected to parts of the model. What is my best approach here?

    Read the article

  • Multi Select Checkbox using ListView

    - by Parsa
    I have a CheckBox in the header of ListView. I write a code to select all Checkboxes in ItemTemplate automatically when the user select the checkBox in the header of ListView. This code is useful, when you bind your ListView in DataPager_PreRender. protected void DataPager1_PreRender(object sender, EventArgs e) { //get the user id of the current user Guid userGuid = (Guid)Membership.GetUser().ProviderUserKey; ListView1.DataSource = MyClass.MyStaticMethod(userGuid.ToString()); ListView1.DataBind(); } protected void ListView1_ItemCreated(object sender, ListViewItemEventArgs e) { //Find the checkBox in each Row CheckBox checkBoxRow = e.Item.FindControl("CheckBoxRow") as CheckBox; //Assign the value of checkBoxHeader to the checkBoxRow checkBoxRow.Checked = CheckBoxHeader.Checked; } protected void ListView1_PagePropertiesChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { // assign false value to the CheckBoxHeader when user click on the DataPager // so if checkboxheader is true in the page 1, when user select Page 2,this check box will be false // therefore all checkbox rows will be false in the new page. if (CheckBoxHeader.Checked == true) CheckBoxHeader.Checked = false; }

    Read the article

  • asp.net mvc2 ajax.actionlink is not working refresh problem

    - by mazhar kaunain baig
    has someone make ajax.actionlink for delete to work properly.After deleting the record successfully at the end it is not refreshing the page properly. the page refresh is my problem. i have defined the updatetarget id and returning view(model) from my controller but it is returning the master page with it. So the thing is that i am having a page with a page.I have used redirect as well which is not refreshing, <%= Ajax.ActionLink("Delete", "Delete", new { id = item.int_OrganizationGroupId }, new AjaxOptions { UpdateTargetId = "abc", HttpMethod = "Post", Confirm = "Delete Group with Organization Group ID:" + item.int_OrganizationGroupId + " Organization Group Name:" + item.vcr_OrganizationGroupName, OnSuccess = "handleSuccess" })%>| abc is the id of the table From controller View("ManageGroup,Model);

    Read the article

  • Actionscript 3 introspection -- function names

    - by Markus O'reilly
    I am trying to iterate through each of the members of an object. For each member, I check to see if it is a function or not. If it is a function, I want to get the name of it and perform some logic based on the name of the function. I don't know if this is even possible though. Is it? Any tips? example: var mems: Object = getMemberNames(obj, true); for each(mem: Object in members) { if(!(mem is Function)) continue; var func: Function = Function(mem); //I want something like this: if(func.getName().startsWith("xxxx")) { func.call(...); } } I'm having a hard time finding much on doing this. Thanks for the help.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542  | Next Page >