Search Results

Search found 5202 results on 209 pages for 'char'.

Page 56/209 | < Previous Page | 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63  | Next Page >

  • Write pointer to file in C

    - by Sergey
    I have a stucture: typedef structure student { char *name; char *surname; int age; } Student; I need to write it to binary file. Student *s = malloc(sizeof(*s)); I fill my structure with data and then i write in to the file: fwrite(s, sizeof(*s), 1, fp); In my file doesnt exist a name and surname, it have an adresses of char*. How can i write to file a word, not an adresses?

    Read the article

  • C++: Best text accumulator

    - by MInner
    Text gets accumulates piecemeal before being sent to client. Now we use own class that allocates memory for each piece as char massive. (Anyway, works like char[][] + std::list<char*>). Then we build the whole string, convert it into std::sting and then create boost::asio::streambuf using it. That's slow enough, I assume. Correct me if I'm wrong. I know, in many cases simple FILE type from stdio.h is used. How does it works? Allocates memory at every write into it. So, is it faster and is there any way to read into boost::asio::streambuf from FILE?

    Read the article

  • Quick strlen question

    - by LearningC
    Hi again. I've come to bother you all with another probably really simple C question. Using the following code: int get_len(char *string){ printf("len: %lu\n", strlen(string)); return 0; } int main(){ char *x = "test"; char y[4] = {'t','e','s','t'}; get_len(x); // len: 4 get_len(y); // len: 6 return 0; } 2 questions. Why are they different and why is y 6? Thanks guys.

    Read the article

  • Linux c++ error: undefined reference to 'dlopen'

    - by lerax
    Hi all! I work in Linux with c++ (eclipse) and want to use a library. Eclipse shows me an error: undefined reference to 'dlopen' Do you know a solution? Here is my code. #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <dlfcn.h> int main(int argc, char **argv) { void *handle; double (*desk)(char*); char *error; handle = dlopen ("/lib/CEDD_LIB.so.6", RTLD_LAZY); if (!handle) { fputs (dlerror(), stderr); exit(1); } desk= dlsym(handle, "Apply"); if ((error = dlerror()) != NULL) { fputs(error, stderr); exit(1); } dlclose(handle); }

    Read the article

  • Declaring a C function to return an array

    - by Jaska
    How can I make a function which returns an array? I tried this const int WIDTH=11; const int HEIGHT=11; int main() { char A[WIDTH][HEIGHT]; A=rand_grid(WIDTH,HEIGHT); return 0; } // Initializes a random board. char[][] rand_grid(int i, int k) { char* A[i][k]; for(j=0;j<i;++j) { for(l=0;l<k;++l) { A[j][l]=ran(10); } } return A; } // Returns a random number from the set {0,...,9}. int ran(int i) { srand((unsigned int) time(0)); return(rand()%10); }

    Read the article

  • java: speed up reading foreign characters

    - by Yang
    My current code needs to read foreign characters from the web, currently my solution works but it is very slow, since it read char by char using InputStreamReader. Is there anyway to speed it up and also get the job done? // Pull content stream from response HttpEntity entity = response.getEntity(); InputStream inputStream = entity.getContent(); StringBuilder contents = new StringBuilder(); int ch; InputStreamReader isr = new InputStreamReader(inputStream, "gb2312"); // FileInputStream file = new InputStream(is); while( (ch = isr.read()) != -1) contents.append((char)ch); String encode = isr.getEncoding(); return contents.toString();

    Read the article

  • How can I access a global pointer outside of a C function?

    - by patrick
    I am trying to access the data of*tkn within a different function in my program for example: putchar(*tkn); It is a global variable but its not working correctly. Any ideas? #define MAX 20 // globals char *tkn; char array[MAX]; ... void tokenize() { int i = 0, j = 0; char *delim = " "; tkn = strtok (str," "); // get token 1 if (tkn != NULL) { printf("token1: "); while ((*tkn != 0) && (tkn != NULL)) { putchar(*tkn); array[i] = *tkn; *tkn++; i++; } } }

    Read the article

  • Forked Function not assigning pointer

    - by Luke Mcneice
    In the code below I have a function int GetTempString(char Query[]); calling it in main works fine. However, when calling the function from a fork the fork hangs (stops running, no errors, no output) before this line: pch = strtok (Query," ,"); the printf shows that the pointer to pch is null. Again this only happens when the fork is executing it. What am I doing doing wrong? int main() { if((Timer =fork())==-1) printf("Timer Fork Failed"); else if(Timer==0) { while(1) { sleep(2); GetTempString("ch 1,2,3,4"); } } else { //CODE GetTempString("ch 1,2,3,4"); } } int GetTempString(char Query[]) { char * pch; printf("DEBUG: '%s'-'%d'\n",Query,pch); pch = strtok (Query," ,");//* PROBLEM HERE* //while loop for strtok... return 1; }

    Read the article

  • Reading in 4 bytes at a time

    - by alphomega
    I have a big file full of integers that I'm loading in. I've just started using C++, and I'm trying out the filestream stuff. From everything I've read, it appears I can only read in bytes, So I've had to set up a char array, and then cast it as a int pointer. Is there a way I can read in 4 bytes at a time, and eliminate the need for the char array? const int HRSIZE = 129951336; //The size of the table char bhr[HRSIZE]; //The table int *dwhr; int main() { ifstream fstr; /* load the handranks.dat file */ std::cout << "Loading table.dat...\n"; fstr.open("table.dat"); fstr.read(bhr, HRSIZE); fstr.close(); dwhr = (int *) bhr; }

    Read the article

  • What is being passed in?

    - by Delirium tremens
    In the code: oneChar :: Char -> Doc oneChar c = case lookup c simpleEscapes of Just r -> text r Nothing | mustEscape c -> hexEscape c | otherwise -> char c where mustEscape c = c < ' ' || c == '\x7f' || c > '\xff' simpleEscapes :: [(Char, String)] simpleEscapes = zipWith ch "\b\n\f\r\t\\\"/" "bnfrt\\\"/" where ch a b = (a, ['\\',b]) r isn't being passed to oneChar. Where does r come from?

    Read the article

  • Copy a function in memory and execute it

    - by Elinghton
    Hi everybody, I would like to know how in C in can copy the content of a function into memroy and the execute it? I'm trying to do something like this: typedef void(*FUN)(int *); char * myNewFunc; char *allocExecutablePages (int pages) { template = (char *) valloc (getpagesize () * pages); if (mprotect (template, getpagesize (), PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC|PROT_WRITE) == -1) { perror ("mprotect"); } } void f1 (int *v) { *v = 10; } // allocate enough spcae but how much ?? myNewFunc = allocExecutablePages(...) /* Copy f1 somewere else * (how? assume that i know the size of f1 having done a (nm -S foo.o)) */ ((FUN)template)(&val); printf("%i",val); Thanks for your answers

    Read the article

  • Use concat and maintain length of variable

    - by user1682055
    I'm trying to use concat on some variables. These variables have been declared as chars: declare v_order_date char(10); declare v_quantity char(11); declare v_plant char(100); I have a cursor where I am setting these as some outputs. To call the results, I am setting v_msg as set v_msg := concat( v_msg, '\n', v_order_date, v_quantity, v_plant); However, the result I am getting when I select v_msg is: 2012-01-222501008 Creeping Buttercup but I want to maintain the length of the declared variables in my select that looks like this 2012-01-22 250 1008 Creeping Buttercup Are there any suggestions? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Avoid incompatible pointer warning when dealing with double-indirection

    - by fnawothnig
    Assuming this program: #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> static void ring_pool_alloc(void **p, size_t n) { static unsigned char pool[256], i = 0; *p = &pool[i]; i += n; } int main(void) { char *str; ring_pool_alloc(&str, 7); strcpy(str, "foobar"); printf("%s\n", str); return 0; } ... is it possible to somehow avoid the GCC warning test.c:12: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘ring_pool_alloc’ from incompatible pointer type test.c:4: note: expected ‘void **’ but argument is of type ‘char **’ ... without casting to (void**) (or simply disabling the compatibility checks)? Because I would very much like to keep compatibility warnings regarding indirection-level...

    Read the article

  • Erlang - Eccentricity with accented characters and string literal

    - by erevfall
    Hey, I am trying to implement a function to differentiate between french vowels and consonnants. It should be trivial, let's see what I wrote down : -define(vowels,"aeiouyàâéèêëôù"). is_vowel(Char) -> C = string:to_lower(Char), lists:member(C,?vowels). It's pretty simple, but it behaves incorrectly : 2> char:is_vowel($â). false While the interpreted version works well : 3> C = string:to_lower($â), lists:member(C,"aeiouyàâéèêëôù"). true What's going on ?

    Read the article

  • How would you create a string of all UTF-8 characters? [PHP]

    - by Xeoncross
    There are many ways to represent the +1 million UTF-8 characters. Take the latin capital "A" with macron (A). This is unicode code point U+0100, hex number 0xc4 0x80, decimal number 196 128, and binary 11000100 10000000. I would like to create a collection of the first 65,535 UTF-8 characters for use in testing applications. These are all unicode characters up to code point U+FFFF (byte3). Is it possible to do something like a for($x=0) loop and then convert the resulting decimal to another base (like hex) which would allow the creation of the matching unicode character? I can create the value A using something like this: $char = "\xc4\x80"; // or $char = chr(196).chr(128); However, I am not sure how to turn this into an automated process. // fail! $char = "\x". dechex($a). "\x". dexhex($$b);

    Read the article

  • c++ function overloading, making fwrite/fread act like PHP versions

    - by Newbie
    I'm used to the PHP fwrite/fread parameter orders, and i want to make them the same in C++ too. I want it to work with char and string types, and also any data type i put in it (only if length is defined). I am total noob on c++, this is what i made so far: size_t fwrite(FILE *fp, const std::string buf, const size_t len = SIZE_MAX){ if(len == SIZE_MAX){ return fwrite(buf.c_str(), 1, buf.length(), fp); }else{ return fwrite(buf.c_str(), 1, len, fp); } } size_t fwrite(FILE *fp, const void *buf, const size_t len = SIZE_MAX){ if(len == SIZE_MAX){ return fwrite((const char *)buf, 1, strlen((const char *)buf), fp); }else{ return fwrite(buf, 1, len, fp); } } Should this work just fine? And how should this be done if i wanted to do it the absolutely best possible way?

    Read the article

  • To find the substring in a given text.. C programm..

    - by RBA
    char *substring(char *text, int position, int length) { int i, j=0; char *temp ; for(i=position-1; i<position+length-1; i++) { temp[j++] = text[i]; } temp[j] = '\0'; return temp; } Hi What is the error in the following code.. I am trying to run this on Fedora Machine.. And its giving me a run-time error "Segmentation Fault". What is this error all about.. and why is it giving this error.. Thanks..

    Read the article

  • MPFR Rounding 0.9999 to 1?

    - by Silmaersti
    I'm attempting to store the value 0.9999 into an mpfr_t variable But 0.9999 is rounded to 1 (or some other value != 0.9999) during storage, no matter the round value (GMP_RNDD, GMP_RNDU, GMP_RNDN, GMP_RNDZ) So what's the best method to store 0.9999 in an mpfr_t variable? Is it possible? Here is my test program, it prints "buffer is: 1", instead of the wanted "buffer is: 0.9999": int main() { size_t precision = 4; mpfr_t mpfrValue; mpfr_init2(mpfrValue, precision); mpfr_set_str(mpfrValue, "0.9999", 10, GMP_RNDN); char *buffer = (char*)malloc((sizeof(char) * precision) + 3); mp_exp_t exponent; mpfr_get_str(buffer, &exponent, 10, precision, mpfrValue, GMP_RNDN); printf("buffer is: %s\n", buffer); free(buffer); mpfr_clear(mpfrValue); return 0; } Thanks for any help !

    Read the article

  • Unmanaged Struct Instance in Managed Class

    - by HeHasMoments
    Hi, I've got a fairly specific problem i've been struggling with for a couple of days. I'm using a native C++, one of the methods takes a ptr to a struct containing fixed size char arrays. e.g. struct userData { char data1[10]; char data2[10]; }; method: short AddItem(long id, userData* data); I'm trying to call to call this from Managed VC++ but I need to have an instance of userData I can keep hold of in my managed class. Can anyone help with how to achieve this? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Designing an API with compile-time option to remove first parameter to most functions and use a glob

    - by tomlogic
    I'm trying to design a portable API in ANSI C89/ISO C90 to access a wireless networking device on a serial interface. The library will have multiple network layers, and various versions need to run on embedded devices as small as an 8-bit micro with 32K of code and 2K of data, on up to embedded devices with a megabyte or more of code and data. In most cases, the target processor will have a single network interface and I'll want to use a single global structure with all state information for that device. I don't want to pass a pointer to that structure through the network layers. In a few cases (e.g., device with more resources that needs to live on two networks) I will interface to multiple devices, each with their own global state, and will need to pass a pointer to that state (or an index to a state array) through the layers. I came up with two possible solutions, but neither one is particularly pretty. Keep in mind that the full driver will potentially be 20,000 lines or more, cover multiple files, and contain hundreds of functions. The first solution requires a macro that discards the first parameter for every function that needs to access the global state: // network.h typedef struct dev_t { int var; long othervar; char name[20]; } dev_t; #ifdef IF_MULTI #define foo_function( x, a, b, c) _foo_function( x, a, b, c) #define bar_function( x) _bar_function( x) #else extern dev_t DEV; #define IFACE (&DEV) #define foo_function( x, a, b, c) _foo_function( a, b, c) #define bar_function( x) _bar_function( ) #endif int bar_function( dev_t *IFACE); int foo_function( dev_t *IFACE, int a, long b, char *c); // network.c #ifndef IF_MULTI dev_t DEV; #endif int bar_function( dev_t *IFACE) { memset( IFACE, 0, sizeof *IFACE); return 0; } int foo_function( dev_t *IFACE, int a, long b, char *c) { bar_function( IFACE); IFACE->var = a; IFACE->othervar = b; strcpy( IFACE->name, c); return 0; } The second solution defines macros to use in the function declarations: // network.h typedef struct dev_t { int var; long othervar; char name[20]; } dev_t; #ifdef IF_MULTI #define DEV_PARAM_ONLY dev_t *IFACE #define DEV_PARAM DEV_PARAM_ONLY, #else extern dev_t DEV; #define IFACE (&DEV) #define DEV_PARAM_ONLY void #define DEV_PARAM #endif int bar_function( DEV_PARAM_ONLY); // I don't like the missing comma between DEV_PARAM and arg2... int foo_function( DEV_PARAM int a, long b, char *c); // network.c #ifndef IF_MULTI dev_t DEV; #endif int bar_function( DEV_PARAM_ONLY) { memset( IFACE, 0, sizeof *IFACE); return 0; } int foo_function( DEV_PARAM int a, long b, char *c) { bar_function( IFACE); IFACE->var = a; IFACE->othervar = b; strcpy( IFACE->name, c); return 0; } The C code to access either method remains the same: // multi.c - example of multiple interfaces #define IF_MULTI #include "network.h" dev_t if0, if1; int main() { foo_function( &if0, -1, 3.1415926, "public"); foo_function( &if1, 42, 3.1415926, "private"); return 0; } // single.c - example of a single interface #include "network.h" int main() { foo_function( 11, 1.0, "network"); return 0; } Is there a cleaner method that I haven't figured out? I lean toward the second since it should be easier to maintain, and it's clearer that there's some macro magic in the parameters to the function. Also, the first method requires prefixing the function names with "_" when I want to use them as function pointers. I really do want to remove the parameter in the "single interface" case to eliminate unnecessary code to push the parameter onto the stack, and to allow the function to access the first "real" parameter in a register instead of loading it from the stack. And, if at all possible, I don't want to have to maintain two separate codebases. Thoughts? Ideas? Examples of something similar in existing code? (Note that using C++ isn't an option, since some of the planned targets don't have a C++ compiler available.)

    Read the article

  • How can I detect endianness on a system where all primitive integer sizes are the same?

    - by Joe Wreschnig
    (This question came out of explaining the details of CHAR_BIT, sizeof, and endianness to someone yesterday. It's entirely hypothetical.) Let's say I'm on a platform where CHAR_BIT is 32, so sizeof(char) == sizeof(short) == sizeof(int) == sizeof(long). I believe this is still a standards-conformant environment. The usual way to detect endianness at runtime (because there is no reliable way to do it at compile time) is to make a union { int i, char c[sizeof(int)] } x; x.i = 1 and see whether x.c[0] or x.c[sizeof(int)-1] got set. But that doesn't work on this platform, as I end up with a char[1]. Is there a way to detect whether such a platform is big-endian or little-endian, at runtime? Obviously it doesn't matter inside this hypothetical system, but one can imagine it is writing to a file, or some kind of memory-mapped area, which another machine reads and reconstructs it according to its (saner) memory model.

    Read the article

  • Building 16 bit os - character array not working

    - by brainbarshan
    Hi. I am building a 16 bit operating system. But character array does not seem to work. Here is my example kernel code: asm(".code16gcc\n"); void putchar(char); int main() { char *str = "hello"; putchar('A'); if(str[0]== 'h') putchar('h'); return 0; } void putchar(char val) { asm("movb %0, %%al\n" "movb $0x0E, %%ah\n" "int $0x10\n" : :"m"(val) ) ; } It prints: A that means putchar function is working properly but if(str[0]== 'h') putchar('h'); is not working. I am compiling it by: gcc -fno-toplevel-reorder -nostdinc -fno-builtin -I./include -c -o ./bin/kernel.o ./source/kernel.c ld -Ttext=0x9000 -o ./bin/kernel.bin ./bin/kernel.o -e 0x0 What should I do?

    Read the article

  • How to display label of unnamed drive ?

    - by iira
    I want to get the name or label of drive. I use this function : function GetVolumeLabel(DriveChar: Char): string; var NotUsed: DWORD; VolumeFlags: DWORD; VolumeInfo: array[0..MAX_PATH] of Char; VolumeSerialNumber: DWORD; Buf: array [0..MAX_PATH] of Char; begin GetVolumeInformation(PChar(DriveChar + ':\'), Buf, SizeOf(VolumeInfo), @VolumeSerialNumber, NotUsed, VolumeFlags, nil, 0); SetString(Result, Buf, StrLen(Buf)); { Set return result } Result:=AnsiUpperCase(Result) end; For example, here're my drives in Windows Explorer : Local Disk (C:) Data (D:) DVD RW Drive (E:) The output of the code : C: D: DATA E: The labels of C and E are empty. What winapi/function should I use to display the label of unnamed drive (C and E)?

    Read the article

  • Why does strlen not working for me?

    - by tushar
    char p[4]={'h','g','y'}; cout<<strlen(p); This code prints 3. char p[3]={'h','g','y'}; cout<<strlen(p); This prints 8. char p[]={'h','g','y'}; cout<<strlen(p); This again prints 8. Please help me as I can't figure out why three different values are printed by changing the size of the array.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63  | Next Page >