Search Results

Search found 10318 results on 413 pages for 'computed column'.

Page 56/413 | < Previous Page | 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63  | Next Page >

  • Selecting a column that is also a keyword in MySQL

    - by randall123
    For some reason, the developers at a new company I'm working for decided to name their columns "ignore" and "exists". Now when I run MySQL queries with those words in the where clause, I get a syntax error; however, I can't seem to figure out how to reference those columns without running into an error. I tried setting them as strings, but that doesn't make any sense. Help? Also, is there a term for this kind of mismatch?

    Read the article

  • In SQL Server changing column varchar(255) nvarchar

    - by JD
    Hi, I am using SQL server 2008 express and some of our columns are defined as varchar(255). Should I convert these columns to NvarChar(255) or nvarchar(max)? The reason I ask is I read that nvarchar(255) for unicode characters would actually store 1/2 the number of characters (since unicode characters are 2 bytes) whereas 255 with varchar() would allow me to store 255 characters (or is it 255 - 2 for the offset). Would there be any performance hits using nvarchar(max)? JDs

    Read the article

  • SharePoint filtered column that only allows item to be used once

    - by Jason
    I have a WSS 3.0 site that I use for change management. There are three primary lists on it -- a bug list, an enhancement list, and a release list. The release list has two lookup columns that provide a list of bugs and enhancements that are included in that particular release. I am trying to figure out how to filter the bug and enhancement list to include only items that have not already been included in another release. All the docs and examples I have seen regarding filtered lookups deal with a query on the list itself. For my situation, and if this was a SQL query, I would need to use a LEFT JOIN to generate the list.

    Read the article

  • Equal Column Heights

    - by cjmcjm
    I want the east and west divs to extend down to match the height of the center div... possible? Thanks so much. .con{ padding-left: 22px; padding-right: 22px; overflow: hidden; } .col{ position: relative; float: left; } .west{ width: 7px; right: 22px; margin-left: -100%; background: url(http://www.example.com/west.png) repeat-y; padding: 0 0 0 15; } .east{ width: 7px; margin-right: -22px; background: url(http://www.example.com/east.png) repeat-y; padding: 0 15 0 0; } .center{ width: 100%; } <div class="con"> <div class="center col"> Test Text<br/> Test Text<br/> Test Text<br/> Test Text<br/> </div> <div class="west col"> </div> <div class="east col"> </div> </div>

    Read the article

  • Searching a column containing CSV data in a MySQL table for existence of input values

    - by Adarsh R
    Hi, I have a table say, ITEM, in MySQL that stores data as follows: ID FEATURES -------------------- 1 AB,CD,EF,XY 2 PQ,AC,A3,B3 3 AB,CDE 4 AB1,BC3 -------------------- As an input, I will get a CSV string, something like "AB,PQ". I want to get the records that contain AB or PQ. I realized that we've to write a MySQL function to achieve this. So, if we have this magical function MATCH_ANY defined in MySQL that does this, I would then simply execute an SQL as follows: select * from ITEM where MATCH_ANY(FEAURES, "AB,PQ") = 0 The above query would return the records 1, 2 and 3. But I'm running into all sorts of problems while implementing this function as I realized that MySQL doesn't support arrays and there's no simple way to split strings based on a delimiter. Remodeling the table is the last option for me as it involves lot of issues. I might also want to execute queries containing multiple MATCH_ANY functions such as: select * from ITEM where MATCH_ANY(FEATURES, "AB,PQ") = 0 and MATCH_ANY(FEATURES, "CDE") In the above case, we would get an intersection of records (1, 2, 3) and (3) which would be just 3. Any help is deeply appreciated. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Querying datatable to get rows with a certain value in the first column

    - by user1776590
    I am currently using the code below and am wondering if it would be possible to query based on an entry value. At the moment it returns the number of rows that have been defined. var q = sqlData.AsEnumerable().Take(2); This data comes in from a database and is imputed into the table but at the moment it only returns database data into the datatable and allows me to select the first two rows and I was wondering if I can query the data table so that I can get the rows that I require based on an index in the actual table itself (e.g. in the table I find five rows and query this information out).

    Read the article

  • How can I SELECT rows with MAX(Column value), DISTINCT by another column in SQL?

    - by Kaptah
    My table is: id home datetime player resource ---|-----|------------|--------|--------- 1 | 10 | 04/03/2009 | john | 399 2 | 11 | 04/03/2009 | juliet | 244 5 | 12 | 04/03/2009 | borat | 555 3 | 10 | 03/03/2009 | john | 300 4 | 11 | 03/03/2009 | juliet | 200 6 | 12 | 03/03/2009 | borat | 500 7 | 13 | 24/12/2008 | borat | 600 8 | 13 | 01/01/2009 | borat | 700 I need to select each distinct "home" holding the maximum value of "datetime". Result would be: id home datetime player resource ---|-----|------------|--------|--------- 1 | 10 | 04/03/2009 | john | 399 2 | 11 | 04/03/2009 | juliet | 244 5 | 12 | 04/03/2009 | borat | 555 7 | 13 | 24/12/2008 | borat | 600 8 | 13 | 01/01/2009 | borat | 700 I have tried: // 1 ..by the MySQL manual: SELECT DISTINCT home, id, datetime as dt, player, resource FROM topten t1 WHERE datetime = (SELECT MAX(t2.datetime) FROM topten t2 GROUP BY home ) GROUP BY daytime ORDER BY daytime DESC Doesn't work. Result-set has 130 rows although database holds 187. Result includes some dublicates of 'home'. // 2 ..join SELECT s1.id, s1.home, s1.datetime, s1.player, s1.resource FROM topten s1 JOIN (SELECT id, MAX(datetime) AS dt FROM topten GROUP BY id) AS s2 ON s1.id = s2.id ORDER BY daytime Nope. Gives all the records. // 3 ..something exotic: With various results.

    Read the article

  • Select column value that matches a combination of other columns values on the same table

    - by Ala
    I have a table called Ads and another Table called AdDetails to store the details of each Ad in a Property / Value style, Here is a simplified example with dummy code: [AdDetailID], [AdID], [PropertyName], [PropertyValue] 2 28 Color Red 3 28 Speed 100 4 27 Color Red 5 28 Fuel Petrol 6 27 Speed 70 How to select Ads that matches many combinations of PropertyName and PropertyValue, for example : where PropertyName='Color' and PropertyValue='Red' And where PropertyName='Speed' and CAST(PropertyValue AS INT) > 60

    Read the article

  • How change column names randomly in gridview?

    - by James123
    I am struggling to show different views of gridview with database values. Here is my requirement. Database Table: I need to show one drop downlist with three values 1,2,3. If user selects 3 i Need to show a grid like below Age,AnnualSales and Assortment are names which are coming dynamically from database. High,Medium and Core all are values Here my question is I need to show same attribute names. Like If the name changes from "Assortment" to "Location" I need to show it in different page index . In page index 2 i need to show like below. Please help with solution

    Read the article

  • Single Column Multiple Filter In Mysql Intersection

    - by Jeebus
    Here is a table CarID| Attribute | Value 1 | Color | Red 2 | Color | Blue 3 | Color | Red 1 | Type | Coupe 2 | Type | Hatch Back 3 | Type | Coupe 3 | Make | Honda 2 | Make | Toyota 1 | Make | Ford Now I would like to run a filter Like Select * From Cars WHERE (Attribute = Color AND Value = Red) AND (Attribute = Make AND Value = Honda).... and Hope to get the CarID as 3 ! This is simple case of Intersection of 2 queries but I don't know how to get it done in a single query. Any help appriciated.

    Read the article

  • Rails Model multiple column uniqueness

    - by Jty.tan
    I am making a Viewer model with belongs_to :users belongs_to :orders that joins the models Users and Orders with a :has_many :through => :viewers. And the Viewer model has the attributes of user_id and order_id. How would I set it up so that new viewers are only accepted if both user_id and order_id are unique in the same row? I remember in MySQL being able to do so with a flag (although I can't for the life of me remember what it was), but I'm not sure how to do it with Rails. Can I do something like (for Viewer.rb) validates_uniqueness_of :user_id, :scope => :order_id?

    Read the article

  • Mysql join two tables and add column values

    - by Mike
    My knowledge of mysql is not very in depth. If I have two tables that for example look like this: Table1 Date v1 v2 v3 05/01/2010 26 abc 45 05/02/2010 31 def 25 05/03/2010 50 ghi 46 Table2 Date v1 v2 v3 05/01/2010 42 jkl 15 05/02/2010 28 mno 14 05/03/2010 12 pqr 64 How can I join them in a query by their date and have the sum of table1.v1 and table2.v1 and also have the sum of table1.v3 and table2.v3. V2 should be ignored.

    Read the article

  • Retrieve part of a MySQL column with PHP

    - by Gerardo Marset
    For instance, if I have the following table: +----+---+----------+ | id | a | position | +----+---+----------+ | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 4 | | 3 | 1 | 9 | | 4 | 1 | 6 | | 5 | 1 | 1 | +----+---+----------+ and I want to get an array that contains the first 100 values from position where a is 1 in ascending order, what would I do? Im guessing something like this: $col = mysql_fetch_array( mysql_query(' SELECT `position` FROM `table` WHERE `a`="1" ORDER BY `position` ASC LIMIT 100 ')); I'd expect to get the following array: +-------+-------+ | index | value | +-------+-------+ | 0 | 1 | | 1 | 4 | | 2 | 6 | | 3 | 9 | +-------+-------+ but it doesn't work. ¿What should I do to make it work? Thanks

    Read the article

  • How can I pin a div in my sidebar column to the bottom?

    - by vg1890
    I have a simple two column layout with a footer at the bottom. When the content in the sidebar is taller than the content in the main column, everything looks great. But when the height of the main column is greater than the sidebar, I need the sidebar to grow to the same height as the main column and for the last <div> in the sidebar to be pinned to the very bottom. Here's my sample code: http://jsfiddle.net/mqnML/1/

    Read the article

  • A simple two column layout with Swing

    - by Derk
    How to get a sidebar JPanel of a fixed with with Swing. Now I'm trying this: public SidebarPanel() { this.setLayout(new BoxLayout(this, BoxLayout.PAGE_AXIS)); this.setPreferredSize(new Dimension(200, this.getPreferredSize().height)); ... But when I resize the window also the width of the sidebar changes. How to fix this?

    Read the article

  • Using SQL dB column as a lock for concurrent operations in Entity Framework

    - by Sid
    We have a long running user operation that is handled by a pool of worker processes. Data input and output is from Azure SQL. The master Azure SQL table structure columns are approximated to [UserId, col1, col2, ... , col N, beingProcessed, lastTimeProcessed ] beingProcessed is boolean and lastTimeProcessed is DateTime. The logic in every worker role is: public void WorkerRoleMain() { while(true) { try { dbContext db = new dbContext(); // Read foreach (UserProfile user in db.UserProfile .Where(u => DateTime.UtcNow.Subtract(u.lastTimeProcessed) > TimeSpan.FromHours(24) & u.beingProcessed == false)) { user.beingProcessed = true; // Modify db.SaveChanges(); // Write // Do some long drawn processing here ... ... ... user.lastTimeProcessed = DateTime.UtcNow; user.beingProcessed = false; db.SaveChanges(); } } catch(Exception ex) { LogException(ex); Sleep(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5)); } } // while () } With multiple workers processing as above (each with their own Entity Framework layer), in essence beingProcessed is being used a lock for MutEx purposes Question: How can I deal with concurrency issues on the beingProcessed "lock" itself based on the above load? I think read-modify-write operation on the beingProcessed needs to be atomic but I'm open to other strategies. Open to other code refinements too.

    Read the article

  • SQL: Update a column with multiple values with single query

    - by Sandeep Jindal
    Hi, I have an update query like following: update table TABLE1 set COL1 = 'X' where COL2 = 'Y' ---1 Support the values 'X' and 'Y' are fetched from database now TABLE2. E.g. select COL1, COL2 from TABLE2. ----2 I want to update table TABLE1 with values from TABLE2. Just to make it more clear, assume that TABLE2 has following values: Can you please help me in doing this in a single query!

    Read the article

  • How to save multiple column in database

    - by shamim
    I have a text file.I need to get data from this text file and show on grid , 1)After this user can update information from gridview, 2)Click on save button save data on database. Before clicking on button data don't save on database.How to do that?

    Read the article

  • SQL Query Help - Return row in table which relates to another table row with max(column)

    - by Seth
    I have two tables: Table1 = Schools Columns: id(PK), state(nvchar(100)), schoolname Table2 = Grades Columns: id(PK), id_schools(FK), Year, Reading, Writing... I would like to develop a query to find the schoolname which has the highest grade for Reading. So far I have the following and need help to fill in the blanks: SELECT Schools.schoolname, Grades.Reading FROM Schools, Grades WHERE Schools.id = (* need id_schools for max(Grades.Reading)*)

    Read the article

  • Oracle ODBC x64 - getting 0 when selecting a number(9) column

    - by MatsL
    I'm having a really weird problem with a third party web service that uses an ODBC connection to Oracle 10.2.0.3.0. I've written a .NET client that generates the same SQL as the web service so I can find out what's going on. The web service is hosted by IIS 6 that's in x64 mode so we use Oracle x64 client. The oracle client version is 10.2.0.1.0. I have a table that looks like this (I've removed some columns and names): SQL> describe tablename; Name Null? Type ----------------------------------------- -------- ---------------------------- KOD VARCHAR2(30) ORDNING NUMBER(5) AVGIFT NUMBER(9) I then in SQL*Plus issue the following statement: SELECT KOD as kod, AVGIFT as riskPoang FROM tablename Where upper(KODTYP) = 'OBJLIVSV_RISKVERKSAMTYP' ORDER BY ORDNING And I get the following result: KOD RISKPOANG ------------------------------ ---------- Hög risk 55 Mellan risk 35 Låg risk 15 Mycket låg risk 5 But when I execute the exact same SQL using the same DSN on the same machine I get this: Values Kod: Hög risk RiskPoäng: 0 Kod: Mellan risk RiskPoäng: 0 Kod: Låg risk RiskPoäng: 0 Kod: Mycket låg risk RiskPoäng: 0 If I first cast the number to varchar and then back again to number, like this: SELECT KOD as kod, to_number(to_char(AVGIFT, '99'), '9999999999') as riskPoang FROM tablename Where upper(KODTYP) = 'OBJLIVSV_RISKVERKSAMTYP' ORDER BY ORDNING I get the correct result: Values Kod: Hög risk RiskPoäng: 55 Kod: Mellan risk RiskPoäng: 35 Kod: Låg risk RiskPoäng: 15 Kod: Mycket låg risk RiskPoäng: 5 Has anyone else experiences this? It's incredibly annoying and I'm completely stuck and not sure what to do next. We have a third party web service that use these tables so I must get the original SQL-statement to work since I can't modify its code. And pointers are greatly appreciated! :-) Best regards, Mats

    Read the article

  • SQL Alias as Table.column

    - by bakerjr
    hi, is it possible to alias an aggregate function in a select clause as AliasTable.AliasColumn? The reason is because I want minimum modifications in my arrays (I'm using PHP). Thanks! P.S. I'm using SQl Server 2008

    Read the article

  • Are Multi-column Primary Keys in MySQL a optimisation problem?

    - by David
    Been looking into using multi-column primary keys and as performance is extremely important with the size of traffic and database I need to know if there is anything to consider before I start throwing out the unique ID method on many of my tables and start using mulit column primary keys. So, what are the performance/optimisation pros/cons to using multi column primary keys versus a basic single column, auto-inc primary key?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63  | Next Page >