Search Results

Search found 11052 results on 443 pages for 'linked tables'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 56/443 | < Previous Page | 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63  | Next Page >

  • mysql - check if data exists across multiple tables

    - by Dd Daym
    I am currently running this query inside MySQL to check if the specified values exists within the table associated with them. SELECT COUNT(artist.artist_id), COUNT(album.album_id), COUNT(tracks.track_id) FROM artist, album, tracks WHERE artist.artist_id = 320295 OR album.album_id = 1234 OR tracks.track_id = 809 The result I get from running this query is all 1, meaning that all the statements after the WHERE clause is true. To further check the query's reliability, I changed the tracks.track_ = 809 to 802, which I know does not match. However the results displayed are still all 1, meaning that they were all successfully matched even when I purposefully inserted a value which would not have matched. How do I get it to show 1 for a match and 0 for no matches within the same query? EDIT: I have inserted an image of the query running

    Read the article

  • How to add indexes to MySQL tables?

    - by Michael
    I've got a very large MySQL table with about 150,000 rows of data. Currently, when I try and run SELECT * FROM table WHERE id = '1'; the code runs fine as the ID field is the primary index. However, recently for a development in the project, I have to search the database by another field. For example SELECT * FROM table WHERE product_id = '1'; This field was not previously indexed, however, I've added it as an index but when I try to run the above query, the results is very slow. An EXPLAIN query reveals that there is no index for the product_id field when I've already added one and as a result the query takes any where from 20 minutes to 30 minutes to return a single row. EDIT: My full EXPLAIN results are: | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----+-------------+-------+------+----------------------+------+---------+------+------+------------------+ | 1 | SIMPLE | table | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 157211 | Using where | +----+-------------+-------+------+----------------------+------+---------+------+------+------------------+

    Read the article

  • Two Different Types of Associatons on the Same Two Tables in Rails

    - by tmo256
    I have two models, users and themes, that I'm currently joining in a HABTM association in a themes_users table. Basically, after a user creates a new theme, it becomes available to other users to select for their own use. However, only the original creator of the theme should have the ability to edit it. So, I need to have some other kind of association to handle that relationship, something like an created_by_id field in the theme. In this way, the user model acts as two different roles: they can be an implementer of a theme AND/OR the owner of the theme. The implementer relationship is handled by the themes_users join table; the question is: What is the right way to handle this secondary association? Do I need to make users polymorphic and then make the created_by_id reference an "owner"? Or is there something easier? Thanks so much for your help!

    Read the article

  • merging two tables, while applying aggregates on the duplicates (max,min and sum)

    - by cloudraven
    I have a table (let's call it log) with a few millions of records. Among the fields I have Id, Count, FirstHit, LastHit. Id - The record id Count - number of times this Id has been reported FirstHit - earliest timestamp with which this Id was reported LastHit - latest timestamp with which this Id was reported This table only has one record for any given Id Everyday I get into another table (let's call it feed) with around half a million records with these fields among many others: Id Timestamp - Entry date and time. This table can have many records for the same id What I want to do is to update log in the following way. Count - log count value, plus the count() of records for that id found in feed FirstHit - the earliest of the current value in log or the minimum value in feed for that id LastHit - the latest of the current value in log or the maximum value in feed for that id. It should be noticed that many of the ids in feed are already in log. The simple thing that worked is to create a temporary table and insert into it the union of both as in Select Id, Min(Timestamp) As FirstHit, MAX(Timestamp) as LastHit, Count(*) as Count FROM feed GROUP BY Id UNION ALL Select Id, FirstHit,LastHit,Count FROM log; From that temporary table I do a select that aggregates Min(firsthit), max(lasthit) and sum(Count) Select Id, Min(FirstHit),Max(LastHit),Sum(Count) FROM @temp GROUP BY Id; and that gives me the end result. I could then delete everything from log and replace it with everything with temp, or craft an update for the common records and insert the new ones. However, I think both are highly inefficient. Is there a more efficient way of doing this. Perhaps doing the update in place in the log table?

    Read the article

  • MySQL customized join query using multiple tables

    - by itgeek
    I am searching one student from each class from one group. There are different class groups and every group has different classes and every class has multiple students. See below: Group1 --> Class1, Class2 etc Class1 --> GreenStudent1, GreenStudent2 etc Class2 --> RedStudent1, RedStudent2 etc ------------------------------------------------------ SELECT table1.id, table1.myname, table1.marks table2.studentid, table2.studentname FROM table1 INNER JOIN table3 ON table1.oldid = table3.id INNER JOIN table2 ON table2.studentid = table3.newid WHERE table1.classgroup = 'SCI79' GROUP BY table1.oldid ORDER BY table1.marks DESC There are different joins applied in the query. Above mentioned query giving me correct results but I need little modification in it. Current query returning me one student from each class. What I need? I need one student from each class but only that student who has MAXIMUM table1.marks So I should have one student from each class who has maximum number in their relevant classes. Can anyone suggest some solution or rewrite this query? Thanks :)

    Read the article

  • TSQL - compare tables

    - by Rya
    I want to create a stored procedure that compares the results of two queries. If the results of the 2nd table can be found in the first, print 'YES', otherwise, print 'No'. Table 1: SELECT dbo.Roles.RoleName, dbo.UserRoles.RoleID FROM dbo.Roles LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.UserRoles ON dbo.Roles.RoleID = dbo.UserRoles.RoleID WHERE (dbo.Roles.PortalID = 0) AND (dbo.UserRoles.UserID = 2) Table 2: Declare @RowData as nvarchar(2000) Set @RowData = ( SELECT EditPermissions FROM vw_XMP_DMS_Documents where DocumentID = 2) Select Data from dbo.split(@RowData, ',') For example. Table 1: John Jack James Table 2: John Sally Jane Print 'YES' Is this possible??? Thank you all very much. -R

    Read the article

  • Firefox can not layout nested tables properly?

    - by ooplidi
    I want to implement a collapsible menu. I plan to use table component to simulate a menu, and nest a sub table into a table cell to simulate a sub menu. Below is my code, it works as expected in IE, Chrome and Safari, but it doesn't work well in Firefox: <html> <body> <div id="menu" style="position:absolute; left:150px; top:100px; z-index:1"> <table width="200px" height="90" border=1 cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tr> <td colspan=2>Money</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan=2>Tool</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Food <table style="position:absolute; left:200px; top:60px; z-index:1" width="200px" height="60px" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tr> <td>Cookie</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Fruit <table style="position:absolute; left:200px; top:30px; z-index:1" width="200px" height="60px" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tr> <td>Apple</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Banana</td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table> </div> </body> </html> It seems that Firefox think the "left" and "top" attribute for the level 3 menu is relative to the level 1 menu, so it layout the level 3 menu incorrectly. Other browsers will calculate the offset base on the level 2 menu, that works as expected. Is it a bug in Firefox? If so how can I work around it? I want my code to have the same behavior in all major browsers.

    Read the article

  • How to access JSON values(array) in various tables

    - by ramya
    Hi, I am getting results from JSON, NSDictionary *pname=[[res objectAtIndex:i] objectForKey:@"ax21:productName"]; NSString *str = [pname objectForKey:@"$"]; i++; [detArray addObject:str]; [tblviewhome reloadData]; and calling it in table like cell.textLabel.text = [detArray objectAtIndex:indexPath.section]; this displays data in 4 sections.This is displaying data perfectly . JSON connectivity and table are in same class. but how to access this data in another table which is in another view controller. I hope i made my self clear.

    Read the article

  • How to create a reference tables for collection classes using fluent nhibernate

    - by Akk
    How can i create a 3 table schema from the following model classes. public class Product { public int Id {get; set;} public string Name {get; set;} public IList<Photo> Photos {get; set;} } public class Photo { public int Id {get; set;} public string Path {get; set;} } I want to create the following table structure in the database: Product ------- Id Name ProductPhotos ------------- ProductId (FK Products.Id) PhotoId (FK Photos.Id) Photos ------ Id Path How i can express the above Database Schema using Fluent NHibernate? I could only manage the following the Mapping but this does not get me the 3rd Photo ref table. public class ProductMap : ClassMap<Product> { public CityMap() { Id(x => x.Id); Map(x => x.Name); Table("Products"); HasMany(x => x.Photos).Table("ProductPhotos").KeyColumn("ProductId"); } }

    Read the article

  • MySQL how to display data from two tables.

    - by gew
    I'm trying to display the username of the person who has submitted the most articles but I don't know how to do it using MySQL & PHP, can someone help me? Here is the MySQL code. CREATE TABLE users ( user_id INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, username VARCHAR(255) DEFAULT NULL, pass CHAR(40) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (user_id) ); CREATE TABLE users_articles ( id INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, user_id INT UNSIGNED mNOT NULL, title TEXT NOT NULL, acontent LONGTEXT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ); Here is the code I have so far. $mysqli = mysqli_connect("localhost", "root", "", "sitename"); $dbc = mysqli_query($mysqli,"SELECT COUNT(*) as coun, user_id FROM users_articles GROUP BY user_id ORDER BY coun DESC LIMIT 1");

    Read the article

  • How come Java doesn't accept my LinkedList in a Generic, but accepts its own?

    - by master chief
    For a class assignment, we can't use any of the languages bultin types, so I'm stuck with my own list. Anyway, here's the situation: public class CrazyStructure <T extends Comparable<? super T>> { MyLinkedList<MyTree<T>> trees; //error: type parameter MyTree is not within its bound } However: public class CrazyStructure <T extends Comparable<? super T>> { LinkedList<MyTree<T>> trees; } Works. MyTree impleements the Comparable interface, but MyLinkedList doesn't. However, Java's LinkedList doesn't implement it either, according to this. So what's the problem and how do I fix it? MyLinkedList: public class MyLinkedList<T extends Comparable<? super T>> { private class Node<T> { private Node<T> next; private T data; protected Node(); protected Node(final T value); } Node<T> firstNode; public MyLinkedList(); public MyLinkedList(T value); //calls node1.value.compareTo(node2.value) private int compareElements(final Node<T> node1, final Node<T> node2); public void insert(T value); public void remove(T value); } MyTree: public class LeftistTree<T extends Comparable<? super T>> implements Comparable { private class Node<T> { private Node<T> left, right; private T data; private int dist; protected Node(); protected Node(final T value); } private Node<T> root; public LeftistTree(); public LeftistTree(final T value); public Node getRoot(); //calls node1.value.compareTo(node2.value) private int compareElements(final Node node1, final Node node2); private Node<T> merge(Node node1, Node node2); public void insert(final T value); public T extractMin(); public int compareTo(final Object param); }

    Read the article

  • LinkedList insert tied to inserted object

    - by wrongusername
    I have code that looks like this: public class Polynomial { List<Term> term = new LinkedList<Term>(); and it seems that whenever I do something like term.add(anotherTerm), with anotherTerm being... another Term object, it seems anotherTerm is referencing the same thing as what I've just inserted into term so that whenever I try to change anotherTerm, term.get(2) (let's say) get's changed too. How can I prevent this from happening?

    Read the article

  • Custom Drupal Module not creating any tables

    - by Anthony
    Anything specific I need in the module file? Install File function module_install() { //lets create the school database $create_table_sql = "CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `table1` ( id int(11) NOT NULL, principal_name varchar(300) NOT NULL, school_name varchar(300) NOT NULL, address1 varchar(300) NOT NULL, address2 varchar(300) NOT NULL, city varchar(300) NOT NULL, computer_serial_no varchar(300) NOT NULL, state varchar(200) NOT NULL, uid int(200) NOT NULL ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1"; db_query($create_table_sql); //lets create the student database $create_table_sql = "CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS table2 ( id int(11) NOT NULL, principal_name varchar(300) NOT NULL, school_name varchar(300) NOT NULL, address1 varchar(300) NOT NULL, address2 varchar(300) NOT NULL, city varchar(300) NOT NULL, computer_serial_no varchar(300) NOT NULL, state varchar(200) NOT NULL, uid int(200) NOT NULL ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1"; db_query($create_table_sql); } /** * _UNINSTALL hook * * This function is run to uninstall the module. * */ function module_uninstall() { // Delete the DB db_query("drop table table1"); db_query("drop table table2"); } Info File Just in Case ; $Id$ name = My Module description = This module deals with blah blah package = Somepackage core = 6.x version = "6.x-1.0" core = "6.x"

    Read the article

  • How to update two f.select from 2 different tables on ruby on rails

    - by Zerosoul13
    Hello, I just started working on a Ruby On Rails project and i got to the point where i need to see the contacts of a company. They should appear once the company is selected.. <%= observe_field :empresa_id, :url={:action = "get_contactos", :controller= :contactos, :updatewith =:empresa_id} % but nothing happens, i don't see even a error on the script/server. Can someone point me in the right direction? http://nealenssle.com/blog/2007/04/12/how-to-dynamically-update-form-elements-in-rails-using-ajax/ I see on the link that a guy did the exact same thing i need but did not post any info. Cheers.

    Read the article

  • mysql select from multi tables problem

    - by moustafa
    this is the query SELECT members.memberID, members.salutation, members.firstName, members.middleName, members.lastName, members.suffix, members.company, addresses.address1, addresses.address2, addresses.city, addresses.state, addresses.postalCode, addresses.country, addresses.memberID, email.email, email.memberID, phonenumbers.phoneNumber, phonenumbers.memberId, subscriptions.year, subscriptions.memberID FROM members, addresses, email, phonenumbers, subscriptions WHERE subscriptions.year = '%s' AND subscriptions.memberID = members.memberID AND subscriptions.memberID = addresses.memberID AND subscriptions.memberID = email.memberID AND subscriptions.memberID = phonenumbers.memberID ORDER BY members.lastName, members.firstName, members.company LIMIT 0, 10 my problem is its a huge query so Im trying to limit it to so many at a time... its supposed to have over 5000 results... anyway the only limit that works is limit 0, 10 if you do anything else 5, 10 it doesnt work 0, 50 doesnt work... only 0, 10 works... and when I do 0, 10 the query returns blake firstName, middleName, lastName, and a few others... and when I do a print_r() on the $result it shows them blank as well and there is most def data in the database and there is also no typos for that...

    Read the article

  • Joining 3 tables - doing joins how to

    - by Kieran
    This is my current query - its not getting the required result. I want it do display all of the "resources" even if they dont have a connection. SELECT * FROM (`user_permissions`) JOIN `user_groups` ON `user_groups`.`id` = `user_permissions`.`role` JOIN `user_resources` ON `user_resources`.`id` = `user_permissions`.`resource` WHERE `role` = '4' When I try left join or right join it still returns the same result. The result I get is: id | role | resource | name 5 | 4 | 2 | Changelog I want id | role | resource | name 5 | 4 | 2 | Changelog null | null | null | Resource2 null | null | null | Resource3 Is this possible?

    Read the article

  • Lua Tables w/ Changing Variables - Mental Block

    - by bottles
    I always assumed that changing the value of k from "x" to 20 would eliminate "x". So why then in this example are we able to go back and reference "x"? a = {} k = "x" a[k] = 10 print(a[k]) ---> Returns 10 print(a["x"]) ---> Returns 10 a[20] = "great" k = 20 print(a[k]) ---> "great" a["x"] = a["x"] + 1 print(a["x"]) --> 11 Why does that last print command work, and return 11? I thought we set k = 20. Why is "x" even in the picture?

    Read the article

  • dymanic columns in mysql tables?

    - by fayer
    i want to add dynamic columns in a mysql table. but i dont know exactly how. i want to let the user add some columns (fields) in a thread. eg. let him add a integer field and a value (eg. price: 199) or a string field and a value (eg. name: teddybear). the user can add as many field/value-pairs as he wants. i thought i could create a many-to-many table: thread <- thread_field <- field thread: id, title thread_field: field_id, thread_id, value field: id, name is this a good structure? but in this way i have to set a specific column type of thread_field.value. either its an integer or a string. i want to have the possibility to have it dymanic, let the user choose. how can i do this? thanks!

    Read the article

  • making query from different related tables using codeigniter

    - by fatemeh karam
    I'm using codeigniter as i mentioned this is a part of my view code foreach($projects_query as $row)// $row indicates the projects { ?> <tr><td><h3><button type="submit" class="button red-gradient glossy" name = "project_click" > <?php echo $row->txtTaskName; ?></button></h3></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <?php foreach($tasks_query as $row2) { // if( $row->txtTaskName == "TestProject") if($row->intTaskID == $row2->intInside)// intInside indicades that the current task($row2) is the subset of which task (system , subsystem or project) { if($row2->intSummary == 0)//if the task(the system) is an executable task & doesn't have any subtask: { $query_team_user_id = $this->admin_in_out_model->get_user_team_task_query($row2->intTaskID);//runs the function and generates a query from tbl_userteamtask where intTaskID equals to the selected row's intTaskID foreach($query_team_user_id as $row_teamid) { $query_teamname = $this->admin_in_out_model->get_team_name($row_teamid->intTeamID); $query_fn_ln = $this->admin_in_out_model->get_fn_ln_from_userid($row_teamid->intUserID); foreach($query_teamname as $row_teamname) {?> <tr><td></td><td></td><td><h4> <?php echo $row2->txtTaskName;?></h4></td> <td><b><font color='#F33558'><?php echo $row_teamname->txtTeamName;?></font></b></td> <?php } foreach($query_fn_ln as $row_f_l_name) {?> <td> <?php echo $row_f_l_name->txtFirstname." ".$row_f_l_name->txtLastname;?></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td> <?php }?> </tr> <?php } } else{ ?> <tr><td></td><td></td><td><h4> <?php echo $row2->txtTaskName;?></h4></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><?php } foreach($tasks_query as $row_subsystems) { if($row_subsystems->intInside == $row2->intTaskID )//if the task is the subtask of a system(it means the task is a subsystem) { if($row_subsystems->intSummary == 0)//if the task is an executable task & doesn't have any subtask: { $query_team_user_id = $this->admin_in_out_model->get_user_team_task_query($row_subsystems->intTaskID); foreach($query_team_user_id as $row_teamid) {?> <tr><?php $query_teamname = $this->admin_in_out_model->get_team_name($row_teamid->intTeamID); $query_fn_ln = $this->admin_in_out_model->get_fn_ln_from_userid($row_teamid->intUserID); foreach($query_teamname as $row_teamname) {?> <td></td><td></td><td><h5><?php echo $row_subsystems->txtTaskName?></h5><br/></td> <td><b><font color='#F33558'><?php echo $row_teamname->txtTeamName;?></font></b></td><?php } foreach($query_fn_ln as $row_f_l_name) {?> <td><?php echo $row_f_l_name->txtFirstname." ".$row_f_l_name->txtLastname;?></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><?php }?> </tr><?php } } else{ ?><tr><td></td><td></td><td><h5><?php echo $row_subsystems->txtTaskName?></h5></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><?php } foreach($tasks_query as $row_tasks) { if($row_tasks->intInside == $row_subsystems->intTaskID )//if the task is the subtask of a subsystem { if($row_tasks->intSummary == 0)//if the task is an executable task & doesn't have any subtask: { $query_team_user_id = $this->admin_in_out_model->get_user_team_task_query($row_tasks->intTaskID); foreach($query_team_user_id as $row_teamid) {?> <tr><?php $query_teamname = $this->admin_in_out_model->get_team_name($row_teamid->intTeamID); $query_fn_ln = $this->admin_in_out_model->get_fn_ln_from_userid($row_teamid->intUserID); foreach($query_teamname as $row_teamname) {?> <td></td><td></td><td><b><?php echo $row_tasks->txtTaskName;?></b></td> <td><b><font color='#F33558'><?php echo $row_teamname->txtTeamName;?></font></b></td><?php } foreach($query_fn_ln as $row_f_l_name) {?> <td><?php echo $row_f_l_name->txtFirstname." ".$row_f_l_name->txtLastname;?></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><?php }?> </tr><?php } } } } } } } } }?> and in controller i have $projects_query = $this->admin_in_out_model->get_projects(); $tasks_query = $this->admin_in_out_model->get_systems(); $userteamtask = $this->admin_in_out_model->get_user_team_task(); $data['tasks_query'] = $tasks_query; $data['projects_query'] = $projects_query; $this->load->view('project_view',$data); but as you see I'm calling my model functions within the view how can i do something else to do this i mean not calling my model function in my view I have to add that, my model function have parameters these are the model functions: function get_projects() { $this -> db -> select('*'); $this -> db -> from('tbl_task'); $this -> db -> where('intInside','0'); $query = $this->db->get(); return $query->result(); } function get_systems() { $this -> db -> select('*'); $this -> db -> from('tbl_task '); $this -> db -> where('intInside <> ','0'); $query = $this->db->get(); return $query->result(); } function get_user_team_task_query($task_id)//gets information from tbl_userteamtask where the field intTaskID is equal to $task_id { $this -> db -> select('*'); $this -> db -> from('tbl_userteamtask'); $this -> db -> where('intTaskID',$task_id); $query_teamid = $this->db->get(); return $query_teamid->result(); } function get_user_team_task()//gets information from tbl_userteamtask where the field intTaskID is equal to $task_id { $this -> db -> select('*'); $this -> db -> from('tbl_userteamtask'); // $this -> db -> where('intTaskID',$task_id); $query_teamid = $this->db->get(); return $query_teamid->result(); } function get_team_name($query_teamid) { $this -> db -> select('*'); $this -> db -> from('tbl_team'); $this -> db -> where('intTeamID',$query_teamid); $query_teamname = $this->db->get(); return $query_teamname->result(); } function get_user_name($query_userid) { $this -> db -> select('*'); $this -> db -> from('tbl_user'); $this -> db -> where('intUserID',$query_userid); $query_username = $this->db->get(); return $query_username->result(); } function get_fn_ln_from_userid($selected_id) { $this -> db -> select('tbl_user.intUserID, tbl_user.intPersonID,tbl_person.intPersonID,tbl_person.txtFirstname, tbl_person.txtLastname'); $this -> db -> from('tbl_user , tbl_person'); $where = "tbl_user.intPersonID = tbl_person.intPersonID "; $this -> db -> where($where); $this -> db -> where('tbl_user.intUserID', $selected_id); $query = $this -> db -> get();//makes query from DB return $query->result(); } do I have to use subquery ? is this true? i mean can i do this? foreach( $data as $key => $each ) { $data[$key]['team_id'] = $this->get_user_team_task_query( $each['intTaskID'] ); foreach($data[$key]['team_id'] as $key_teamname => $each) { $data[$key_teamname]['team_name'] = $this->get_team_name( $each['intTeamID'] ); } } the model code: foreach( $data as $key => $each ) { $data[$key]['intTaskID'] = $each['intTaskID']; $data[$key]['team_id'] = $this->get_user_team_task_query( $each['intTaskID'] ); foreach($data[$key]['team_id'] as $key => $each) { $data[$key]['team_name'] = $this->get_team_name( $each['intTeamID'] ); #fetching of the teamname and saving in the array $data[$key]['user_name'] = $this->get_fn_ln_from_userid( $each['intUserID'] ); foreach($data[$key]['user_name'] as $key => $each) { $data[$key]['first_name'] = $each['txtFirstname'] ; $data[$key]['last_name'] = $each['txtLastname'] ; } $data[$key]['first_name'] = $data[$key]['first_name']; $data[$key]['last_name'] = $data[$key]['last_name']; } }

    Read the article

  • Fluent NHibernate - Map 2 tables to one class

    - by Morten Schmidt
    Hi I have a table structure something like this table Employees EmployeeID EmployeeLogin EmployeeCustID table Customers CustomerID CustomerName What i would like is to map the structure above to one single class named: Class Employee EmployeeID EmployeeLogin EmployeeName How do i do that with fluent nhibernate ?

    Read the article

  • Adding a column to a model at runtime (without additional tables) in rails

    - by Marek
    I'm trying to give admins of my web application the ability to add some new fields to a model. The model is called Artwork and i would like to add, for instante, a test_column column at runtime. I'm just teting, so i added a simple link to do it, it will be of course parametric. I managed to do it through migrations: def test_migration_create Artwork.add_column :test_column, :integer flash[:notice] = "Added Column test_column to artworks" redirect_to :action => 'index' end def test_migration_delete Artwork.remove_column :test_column flash[:notice] = "Removed column test_column from artworks" redirect_to :action => 'index' end It works, the column gets added/ removed to/from the databse without issues. I'm using active_scaffold at the moment, so i get the test_column field in the form without adding anything. When i submit a create or an update, however, the test_column does not get updated and stay empty. Inspecting the parameters, i can see: Parameters: {"commit"=>"Update", "authenticity_token"=>"37Bo5pT2jeoXtyY1HgkEdIhglhz8iQL0i3XAx7vu9H4=", "id"=>"62", "record"=>{"number"=>"test_artwork", "author"=>"", "title"=>"Opera di Test", "test_column"=>"TEEST", "year"=>"", "description"=>""}} the test_column parameter is passed correctly. So why active record keeps ignoring it? I tried to restart the server too without success. I'm using ruby 1.8.7, rails 2.3.5, and mongrel with an sqlite3 database. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to use bindModel to bind 3 different nested tables in CakePHP

    - by paullb
    I have a segment which can have many comments and each comment can have many tags. I can bind the comments to the segments using code like the below which is a function in the segment model class. function prepareForGettingSegmentsWithComments() { $this->bindModel( array('hasMany' => array( 'Comment' => array( 'className' => 'Comment', 'foreignKey' => 'segmentID' ) ) ) ); } However how can I bind in the Tags as well?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63  | Next Page >