Search Results

Search found 1848 results on 74 pages for 'printf'.

Page 56/74 | < Previous Page | 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63  | Next Page >

  • Elegant way for a recursive C++ template to do something different with the leaf class?

    - by Costas
    I have a C++ class template that makes an Array of pointers. This also gets typedefed to make Arrays of Arrays and so on: typedef Array<Elem> ElemArray; typedef Array<ElemArray> ElemArrayArray; typedef Array<ElemArrayArray> ElemArrayArrayArray; I would like to be able to set one leaf node from another by copying the pointer so they both refer to the same Elem. But I also want to be able to set one Array (or Array of Arrays etc) from another. In this case I don't want to copy the pointers, I want to keep the arrays seperate and descend into each one until I get to the leaf node, at where I finally copy the pointers. I have code that does this (below). When you set something in an Array it calls a CopyIn method to do the copying. But because this is templated it also has to call the CopyIn method on the leaf class, which means I have to add a dummy method to every leaf class that just returns false. I have also tried adding a flag to the template to tell it whether it contains Arrays or not, and so whether to call the CopyIn method. This works fine - the CopyIn method of the leaf nodes never gets called, but it still has to be there for the compile to work! Is there a better way to do this? #include <stdio.h> class Elem { public: Elem(int v) : mI(v) {} void Print() { printf("%d\n",mI); } bool CopyIn(Elem *v) { return false; } int mI; }; template < typename T > class Array { public: Array(int size) : mB(0), mN(size) { mB = new T* [size]; for (int i=0; i<mN; i++) mB[i] = new T(mN); } ~Array() { for (int i=0; i<mN; i++) delete mB[i]; delete [] mB; } T* Get(int i) { return mB[i]; } void Set(int i, T* v) { if (! mB[i]->CopyIn(v) ) { // its not an array, so copy the pointer mB[i] = v; } } bool CopyIn(Array<T>* v) { for (int i=0; i<mN; i++) { if (v && i < v->mN ) { if ( ! mB[i]->CopyIn( v->mB[i] )) { // its not an array, so copy the pointer mB[i] = v->mB[i]; } } else { mB[i] = 0; } } return true; // we did the copy, no need to copy pointer } void Print() { for (int i=0; i<mN; i++) { printf("[%d] ",i); mB[i]->Print(); } } private: T **mB; int mN; }; typedef Array<Elem> ElemArray; typedef Array<ElemArray> ElemArrayArray; typedef Array<ElemArrayArray> ElemArrayArrayArray; int main () { ElemArrayArrayArray* a = new ElemArrayArrayArray(2); ElemArrayArrayArray* b = new ElemArrayArrayArray(3); // In this case I need to copy the pointer to the Elem into the ElemArrayArray a->Get(0)->Get(0)->Set(0, b->Get(0)->Get(0)->Get(0)); // in this case I need go down through a and b until I get the to Elems // so I can copy the pointers a->Set(1,b->Get(2)); b->Get(0)->Get(0)->Get(0)->mI = 42; // this will also set a[0,0,0] b->Get(2)->Get(1)->Get(1)->mI = 96; // this will also set a[1,1,1] // should be 42,2, 2,2, 3,3, 3,96 a->Print(); }

    Read the article

  • why am i getting a null pointer when converting string to int array?

    - by Sackling
    My main method: public static void main(String[] args) { Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in); String string1; string1 = input.next(); LargeInteger firstInt = new LargeInteger(string1); System.out.printf("First integer: %s \n", firstInt.display()); } LargeInteger class: public class LargeInteger { private int[] intArray; //convert the strings to array public LargeInteger(String s) { for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); i++) { intArray[i] = Character.digit(s.charAt(i), 10); // in base 10 } } //display the strings public String display() { String result = ""; for (int i = 0; i < intArray.length; i++) { result += intArray[i]; } return result.toString(); } }

    Read the article

  • how to parse from command line arguements in yacc ?

    - by user205688
    how to parse from command line arguements in yacc ? of course i undefined input in both lex & yacc and then wrote int input(void) { printf("in input\n:"); char c; if(target > limit) return 0; if((c = target[0][offset++]) != '\0') return (c); target++; offset =0; return (' '); } where target contains the command line arguements. But only the standard input is getting excueted how to make dis input function get executed.

    Read the article

  • Lua - initializing

    - by Ockonal
    Hello, I can't init lua correctly under Arch Linux. Lua - latest version. Here is my code: #include <stdio.h> extern "C" { #include <lua.h> #include <lauxlib.h> #include <lualib.h> } int main() { lua_State *luaVM = luaL_newstate(); if (luaVM == NULL) { printf("Error initializing lua!\n"); return -1; } luaL_openlibs(luaVM); lua_close(luaVM); return 0; } /tmp/cc0iJ6lW.o: In function main': test_lua.cpp:(.text+0xa): undefined reference toluaL_newstate' test_lua.cpp:(.text+0x34): undefined reference to `luaL_openlibs' test_lua.cpp:(.text+0x40): undefined reference to `lua_close' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status What's wrong?

    Read the article

  • MPFR Rounding 0.9999 to 1?

    - by Silmaersti
    I'm attempting to store the value 0.9999 into an mpfr_t variable But 0.9999 is rounded to 1 (or some other value != 0.9999) during storage, no matter the round value (GMP_RNDD, GMP_RNDU, GMP_RNDN, GMP_RNDZ) So what's the best method to store 0.9999 in an mpfr_t variable? Is it possible? Here is my test program, it prints "buffer is: 1", instead of the wanted "buffer is: 0.9999": int main() { size_t precision = 4; mpfr_t mpfrValue; mpfr_init2(mpfrValue, precision); mpfr_set_str(mpfrValue, "0.9999", 10, GMP_RNDN); char *buffer = (char*)malloc((sizeof(char) * precision) + 3); mp_exp_t exponent; mpfr_get_str(buffer, &exponent, 10, precision, mpfrValue, GMP_RNDN); printf("buffer is: %s\n", buffer); free(buffer); mpfr_clear(mpfrValue); return 0; } Thanks for any help !

    Read the article

  • storing an integer constant other than zero in a pointer variable

    - by benjamin button
    int main() { int *d=0; printf("%d\n",*d); return 0; } this works fine. >cc legal.c > ./a.out 0 if i change the statement int *d=0; to int *d=1; i see the error. cc: "legal.c", line 6: error 1522: Cannot initialize a pointer with an integer constant other than zero. so its obvious that it will allow only zero.i want to know what happens inside the memory when we do this int *d=0 which is making it valid syntax. I am just asking this out of curiosity!

    Read the article

  • timer_getoverrun() doesn't behave as expected when using sleep()

    - by dlp
    Here is a program that uses a POSIX per-process timer alongside the sleep subroutine. The signal used by the timer has been set to SIGUSR1 rather than SIGALRM, since SIGALRM may be used internally by sleep, but it still doesn't seem to work. I have run the program using the command line timer-overruns -d 1 -n 10000000 (1 cs interval) so, in theory, we should expect 100 overruns between calls to sigwaitinfo. However, timer_getoverrun returns 0. I have also tried a version using a time-consuming for loop to introduce the delay. In this case, overruns are recorded. Does anyone know why this happens? I am running a 3.4 Linux kernel. Program source /* * timer-overruns.c */ #include <unistd.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <signal.h> #include <time.h> // Signal to be used for timer expirations #define TIMER_SIGNAL SIGUSR1 int main(int argc, char **argv) { int opt; int d = 0; int r = 0; // Repeat indefinitely struct itimerspec its; its.it_interval.tv_sec = 0; its.it_interval.tv_nsec = 0; // Parse arguments while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "d:r:s:n:")) != -1) { switch (opt) { case 'd': // Delay before calling sigwaitinfo() d = atoi(optarg); break; case 'r': // Number of times to call sigwaitinfo() r = atoi(optarg); break; case 's': // Timer interval (seconds) its.it_interval.tv_sec = its.it_value.tv_sec = atoi(optarg); break; case 'n': // Timer interval (nanoseconds) its.it_interval.tv_nsec = its.it_value.tv_nsec = atoi(optarg); break; default: /* '?' */ fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s [-d signal_accept_delay] [-r repetitions] [-s interval_seconds] [-n interval_nanoseconds]\n", argv[0]); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } } // Check sanity of command line arguments short e = 0; if (d < 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Delay (-d) cannot be negative!\n"); e++; } if (r < 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Number of repetitions (-r) cannot be negative!\n"); e++; } if (its.it_interval.tv_sec < 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Interval seconds value (-s) cannot be negative!\n"); e++; } if (its.it_interval.tv_nsec < 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Interval nanoseconds value (-n) cannot be negative!\n"); e++; } if (its.it_interval.tv_nsec > 999999999) { fprintf(stderr, "Interval nanoseconds value (-n) must be < 1 second.\n"); e++; } if (e > 0) exit(EXIT_FAILURE); // Set default values if not specified if (its.it_interval.tv_sec == 0 && its.it_interval.tv_nsec == 0) { its.it_interval.tv_sec = its.it_value.tv_sec = 1; its.it_value.tv_nsec = 0; } printf("Running with timer delay %d.%09d seconds\n", (int) its.it_interval.tv_sec, (int) its.it_interval.tv_nsec); // Will be waiting for signals synchronously, so block the one in use. sigset_t sigset; sigemptyset(&sigset); sigaddset(&sigset, TIMER_SIGNAL); sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &sigset, NULL ); // Create and arm the timer struct sigevent sev; timer_t timer; sev.sigev_notify = SIGEV_SIGNAL; sev.sigev_signo = TIMER_SIGNAL; sev.sigev_value.sival_ptr = timer; timer_create(CLOCK_REALTIME, &sev, &timer); timer_settime(timer, TIMER_ABSTIME, &its, NULL ); // Signal handling loop int overruns; siginfo_t si; // Make the loop infinite if r = 0 if (r == 0) r = -1; while (r != 0) { // Sleeping should cause overruns if (d > 0) sleep(d); sigwaitinfo(&sigset, &si); // Check that the signal is from the timer if (si.si_code != SI_TIMER) continue; overruns = timer_getoverrun(timer); if (overruns > 0) { printf("Timer overrun occurred for %d expirations.\n", overruns); } // Decrement r if not repeating indefinitely if (r > 0) r--; } return EXIT_SUCCESS; }

    Read the article

  • Why would I get a bus error or segmentation fault when calling free() normally?

    - by chucknelson
    I have a very simple test program, running on Solaris 5.8: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main(void) { char *paths; paths = getenv("PATH"); printf("Paths: %s\n", paths); free(paths); // this causes a bus error return 0; } If I don't call free() at the end, it displays the message fine and exits. If I include the free() call, it crashes with a bus error. I've had other calls to free(), in other programs, cause segmentation faults as well. Even if I allocate the memory for *paths myself, free() will cause a bus error. Is there some reason trying to free up the memory is causing a crash?

    Read the article

  • Why the output for "a" is -80?

    - by Abhi
    #include<stdio.h> #include<conio.h> #define ABC 20 #define XYZ 10 #define XXX ABC - XYZ void main() { int a; a = XXX * 10; printf("\n %d \n", a); getch(); } I thought the output should be 100 but when i saw the result i found o/p as -80. when i put bracket as #define XXX (ABC-XYZ) then i get output as 100 but without bracket i get o/p as -80.

    Read the article

  • Can we have an anonymous struct as template argument?

    - by nonoitall
    The title is pretty self-explanatory, but here's a simplified example: #include <cstdio> template <typename T> struct MyTemplate { T member; void printMemberSize() { printf("%i\n", sizeof(T)); } }; int main() { MyTemplate<struct { int a; int b; }> t; // <-- compiler doesn't like this t.printMemberSize(); return 0; } The compiler complains when I try to use an anonymous struct as a template argument. What's the best way to achieve something like this without having to have a separate, named struct definition?

    Read the article

  • Gtk, Does deleting builder pointer deletes all the Widgets created using it.

    - by PP
    I am creating builder pointer as follows. GtkBuilder *builder_ptr; builder_ptr = gtk_builder_new(); if( ! gtk_builder_add_from_file(builder_ptr, "Test.glade", &error ) ) printf("\n Error Builder, Exit!\n"); and i am deleting this builder pointer as follows: g_object_unref(G_OBJECT(m_builder)); this builder pointer contains 2-3 GtkWindows and other widgets. So my question is that do i need to delete all the windows in this builder manually when i delete this builder or all the windows will get destroyed when i delete builder pointer. Thanks, PP.

    Read the article

  • Returning pointer to a certain value in a macro?

    - by Andrei Ciobanu
    Is it possible to write a macro that has a type and a value as its input parameters (MACRO(type,value)), and returns a valid pointer to a location that holds the submitted value. This macro should perform like the following function, but in a more generic manner: int *val_to_ptr(int val){ int *r = NULL; r = nm_malloc(sizeof(*r)); *r = val; return r; } Where nm_malloc() is a failsafe malloc. The Macro usage should be compatible with this usage: printf("%d",*MACRO(int,5)); Is it possible to achieve that ?

    Read the article

  • How to buffer stdout in memory and write it from a dedicated thread

    - by NickB
    I have a C application with many worker threads. It is essential that these do not block so where the worker threads need to write to a file on disk, I have them write to a circular buffer in memory, and then have a dedicated thread for writing that buffer to disk. The worker threads do not block any more. The dedicated thread can safely block while writing to disk without affecting the worker threads (it does not hold a lock while writing to disk). My memory buffer is tuned to be sufficiently large that the writer thread can keep up. This all works great. My question is, how do I implement something similar for stdout? I could macro printf() to write into a memory buffer, but I don't have control over all the code that might write to stdout (some of it is in third-party libraries). Thoughts? NickB

    Read the article

  • Why am I getting a segmentation fault with this code?

    - by gooswa
    Trying to make a simple rectangle/bin packer in C. Takes a given area and finds placement for any given size rectangle. About after 4 recursions is when I get the segmentation fault. #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct node_type PackNode; struct node_type { int x , y; int width , height; int used; struct node_type *left; struct node_type *right; }; typedef struct point_type PackPoint; struct point_type { int x,y; }; PackNode _clone(PackNode *node) { PackNode clone; clone.used = 0; clone.x = node->x; clone.y = node->y; clone.width = node->width; clone.height= node->height; clone.left = NULL; clone.right= NULL; return clone; } PackNode root; int rcount; PackPoint* recursiveFind(PackNode *node, int w, int h) { PackPoint rp; PackPoint *p = NULL; rcount++; printf ("rcount = %u\n", rcount); //left is not null go to left, if left didn't work try right. if (node->left!=NULL) { //move down to left branch p = recursiveFind(node->left, w, h); if (p!=NULL) { return p; } else { p = recursiveFind(node->right, w, h); return p; } } else { //If used just return null and possible go to the right branch; if (node->used==1 || w > node->width || h > node->height) { return p; } //if current node is exact size and hasn't been used it return the x,y of the mid-point of the rectangle if (w==node->width && h == node->height) { node->used=1; rp.x = node->x+(w/2); rp.y = node->y+(h/2); p = &rp; return p; } //If rectangle wasn't exact fit, create branches from cloning it's parent. PackNode l_clone = _clone(node); PackNode r_clone = _clone(node); node->left = &l_clone; node->right = &r_clone; //adjust branches accordingly, split up the current unused areas if ( (node->width - w) > (node->height - h) ) { node->left->width = w; node->right->x = node->x + w; node->right->width = node->width - w; } else { node->left->height = h; node->right->y = node->y + h; node->right->height = node->height - h; } p = recursiveFind(node->left, w, h); return p; } return p; } int main(void) { root = malloc( root.x=0; root.y=0; root.used=0; root.width=1000; root.height=1000; root.left=NULL; root.right=NULL; int i; PackPoint *pnt; int rw; int rh; for (i=0;i<10;i++) { rw = random()%20+1; rh = random()%20+1; pnt = recursiveFind(&root, rw, rh); printf("pnt.x,y: %d,%d\n",pnt->x,pnt->y); } return 0; }

    Read the article

  • why does the array doesn't get initialized by global variable , even though it should not?

    - by ashish yadav
    why does the array a does not get initialized by global variable 'size'. include int size=5; int main() { int a[size]={1,2,3,4,5}; printf("%d",a[0]); return 0; } the compilation error is shown as "variable-sized object may not be initialized". according to me the array should get initialized by 'size'. i apologize if i am not clear but i feel i have expressed myself well enough. thank you!!!!!!!!!!!

    Read the article

  • Fibonacci Numbers in Haskell

    - by boraer
    Hi everbody I need to change my F# code to Haskell code but I am so new in Haskell and I can not this My code simply read data from keyboard if data not an integer return an error message then calculate the n fibonacci number then writes to a list after that writes the list into a txt file Here is my code open System let rec fib n = match n with |0->0 |1->1 |2->1 |n->fib(n-1)+fib(n-2);; let printFibonacci list = for i=0 to (List.length list)-1 do printf "%d " (list.Item(i));; let writeToFile list = let file = System.IO.File.Create("C:\out2.txt") let mutable s ="" let writer = new System.IO.StreamWriter(file) try for i=0 to (List.length list)-1 do s <- list.Item(i).ToString() writer.Write(s+" ") finally writer.Close() file.Dispose() printfn "Writed To File" let mutable control = true let mutable num = 0 while control do try printfn "Enter a Number:" num <- Convert.ToInt32(stdin.ReadLine()) let listFibonacci = [for i in 0 .. num-1->fib(i)] printFibonacci(listFibonacci) printfn "\n%A"(listFibonacci) writeToFile(listFibonacci) control<-false with | :? System.FormatException->printfn "Number Format Exception"; Console.ReadKey true|>ignore

    Read the article

  • Function declaration in C and C++

    - by Happy Mittal
    I have two C++ files, say file1.cpp and file2.cpp as //file1.cpp #include<cstdio> void fun(int i) { printf("%d\n",i); } //file2.cpp void fun(double); int main() { fun(5); } When I compile them and link them as c++ files, I get an error "undefined reference to fun(double)". But when I do this as C files, I don't get error and 0 is printed instead of 5. Please explain the reason. Moreover I want to ask whether we need to declare a function before defining it because I haven't declared it in file1.cpp but no error comes in compilation.

    Read the article

  • Using scanf() in C++ programs is faster than using cin ?

    - by zeroDivisible
    Hello, I don't know if this is true, but when I was reading FAQ on one of the problem providing sites, I found something, that poke my attention: Check your input/output methods. In C++, using cin and cout is too slow. Use these, and you will guarantee not being able to solve any problem with a decent amount of input or output. Use printf and scanf instead. Can someone please clarify this? Is really using scanf() in C++ programs faster than using cin something ? If yes, that is it a good practice to use it in C++ programs? I thought that it was C specific, though I am just learning C++...

    Read the article

  • C : Memory layout of C program execution

    - by pavun_cool
    Hi All , I wanted know how the kernel is providing memory for simple C program . For example : #include<stdio.h> #include<malloc.h> int my_global = 10 ; main() { char *str ; static int val ; str = ( char *) malloc ( 100 ) ; scanf ( "%s" , str ) ; printf( " val:%s\n",str ) ; } See, In this program I have used static , global and malloc for allocating dynamic memory So , how the memory lay out will be ... ? Any one give me url , which will have have details information about this process..

    Read the article

  • how to compile youtube-api appliation

    - by Gpathy
    Hi, i am developing a custom Youtube video player. But i am not able to compile the program. I am missing something in Makefile. My program looks like main.c #include<gdata/services/youtube/gdata-youtube-service.h> int main(int argc, char **argv[]) { printf("Youtube Application\n"); return 0; } makefile gcc `pkg-config --cflags --libs libgdata-google-1.2`  -lgdata-google-1.2 main.c -o youtube When i compile, it is giving error like error: gdata/services/youtube/gdata-youtube-service.h: No such file or directory Do i got to install some other packages ? Or, i need to include something in my Makefile ? Thanks...

    Read the article

  • pthreads recursively calling system command and segfault appears

    - by jess
    I have a code base where i am creating 8 threads and each thread just calls system command to display date in a continuous cycle, as shown below: void * system_thread(void *arg) { int cpu = (int)arg; printf("thread : start %d\n", cpu); for (;;) { // date ã³ãã³ãã®å®è¡ if (mode == 0) { system("date"); } else { f_hfp_nlc_Fsystem("date"); } } sleep(timerval); return NULL; } This application segfaults after running for 2-3 seconds, due to following 2 reasons: 1. read access, where the address is out of VM area 2. write acces, where it does not of write permission and its trying to modify some structure.

    Read the article

  • Why this C program outputs a negative number?

    - by JMSA
    I have assigned the complement value in an unsigned variable. Then why this C program outputs a negative number? #include<stdio.h> #include<conio.h> int main() { unsigned int Value = 4; /* 4 = 0000 0000 0000 0100 */ unsigned int result = 0; result = ~ Value; /* -5 = 1111 1111 1111 1011 */ printf("result = %d", result); /* -5 */ getch(); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Where does output of print in kernel go?

    - by apoorv020
    I am debugging a driver for linux (specifically ubuntu server 9.04), and there are several printf statements in the code. Where can I view the output of these statements? EDIT1: What i'm trying to do is write to kernel using the proc file-system. The print code is static int proc_fractel_config_write(struct file *file, const char *argbuf, unsigned long count, void *data) { printk(KERN_DEBUG "writing fractel config\n"); ... In kern.log when I see the following message when i try to overwrite the file /proc/net/madwifi/ath1/fractel_config (with varying time of course). [ 8671.924873] proc write [ 8671.924919] Any explainations?

    Read the article

  • The unary increment operator in pointer arithmetic

    - by RhymesWithDuck
    Hello, this is my first post. I have this function for reversing a string in C that I found. void reverse(char* c) { if (*c != 0) { reverse(c + 1); } printf("%c",*c); } It works fine but if I replace: reverse(c + 1); with: reverse(++c); the first character of the original string is truncated. My question is why would are the statements not equivalent in this instance? Thanks

    Read the article

  • searching for hidden files using winapi

    - by Kristian
    HI i want to search for a hidden files and directories in a specefic given path but I don't know how to do it for hidden files i do know how to search for normal files and dir i did this code but im stuck can't make it search for only hidden files #include "stdafx.h" #include <windows.h> int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { TCHAR *fn; fn=L"d:\\*"; HANDLE f; WIN32_FIND_DATA data; { FILE_ATTRIBUTE_HIDDEN; } f=FindFirstFile(fn,&data); if(f==INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE){ printf("not found\n"); return 0; } else{ _tprintf(L"found this file: %s\n",data.cFileName); while(FindNextFile(f,&data)){ _tprintf(L"found this file: %s\n",data.cFileName); } } FindClose(f); return 0; }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63  | Next Page >