Search Results

Search found 21356 results on 855 pages for 'check digit'.

Page 57/855 | < Previous Page | 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64  | Next Page >

  • How to hash and check for equality of objects with circular references

    - by mfya
    I have a cyclic graph-like structure that is represented by Node objects. A Node is either a scalar value (leaf) or a list of n=1 Nodes (inner node). Because of the possible circular references, I cannot simply use a recursive HashCode() function, that combines the HashCode() of all child nodes: It would end up in an infinite recursion. While the HashCode() part seems at least to be doable by flagging and ignoring already visited nodes, I'm having some troubles to think of a working and efficient algorithm for Equals(). To my surprise I did not find any useful information about this, but I'm sure many smart people have thought about good ways to solve these problems...right? Example (python): A = [ 1, 2, None ]; A[2] = A B = [ 1, 2, None ]; B[2] = B A is equal to B, because it represents exactly the same graph. BTW. This question is not targeted to any specific language, but implementing hashCode() and equals() for the described Node object in Java would be a good practical example.

    Read the article

  • Background Worker Check For When It's Midnight?

    - by Soo
    I want to create a background worker for a WinForm that triggers code whenever midnight rolls by. I have an idea of how to do it, but I'm pretty sure it's not the best way to do it. while(1==1) { //if Datetime.Now == midnight, execute code //sleep(1second) }

    Read the article

  • Check for state change in objects using serialization?

    - by sev7n
    I have a form that is bind to an object, and when the user trying to leave the form, I want to warn them if anything on the form has been changed, and prompt them to save. My question is, is there any way to achieve this without implementing IComparar for all my classes in the binded object? I was thinking if there is a way I can serialize my object when loading the form, and do a simple comparison against the change object that also get serialized. Something like a string comparison. Hope that make sense, Thanks

    Read the article

  • Rewrite URL based on file existence check

    - by Anthony Faull
    I need to redirect web requests of the form /{language}-{country}/{file} to: /{language}-{country}/{file} if it exists, otherwise /{language}/{file} if it exists, otherwise /en-US/{file} The existing .htaccess fulfils requirements 1 and 3. What changes do I need to fulfil requirement 2? .htaccess: Options +FollowSymLinks RewriteEngine On RewriteCond $0 !i18n/en-US [NC] RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteRule ^(i18n)/([^/]+)/(.*)$ $1/en-US/$3 [NC,L]

    Read the article

  • password-check directive in angularjs

    - by mpm
    I'm writing a password verify directive : Directives.directive("passwordVerify",function(){ return { require:"ngModel", link: function(scope,element,attrs,ctrl){ ctrl.$parsers.unshift(function(viewValue){ var origin = scope.$eval(attrs["passwordVerify"]); if(origin!==viewValue){ ctrl.$setValidity("passwordVerify",false); return undefined; }else{ ctrl.$setValidity("passwordVerify",true); return viewValue; } }); } }; }); html : <input data-ng-model='user.password' type="password" name='password' placeholder='password' required> <input data-ng-model='user.password_verify' type="password" name='confirm_password' placeholder='confirm password' required data-password-verify="user.password"> Given 2 password fields in a form, if both password values are equal then the field affected by the directive is valid. The issue is that it works one way (i.e. when I type a password in the password-verify field). However, when the original password field is updated, the password-verify doesn't become valid. Any idea how I could have a "two way binding verify?"

    Read the article

  • problem while checking second check checkbox checked.

    - by kumar
    $('#nextpage').click(function() { $('#Details input[type=checkbox]').each( function() { if( $(this).attr('checked') ) { $("#tabs").tabs('enable', 3).tabs('select', 3); } else { $().ShowDialog('please select atleast one'); } }); }); <fieldset> <legend>information</legend> <input type="checkbox"> <label>ID#: <span><%=(null != a) ? Model.ID: 0%></span></label> <label>Name:<span><%=(null != a) ? Model.Name: null%></span></label> </fieldset> this filedset is for multiple users.. that is on the same page there are multiple fiedsetsfor multiple users.. how to handle those things.. thanks

    Read the article

  • check if a line is valid or not in Java

    - by Adnan
    I would like to perform checking on the following: VALID LINES; /**/ some code */ some code /** dsfsdkf sd**/ NOT VALID LINES; /**/ //some code */ /***/ //somecode So basically if there is a line of code outside a comment it is valid, otherwise not. What would be the best way to tackle this kind of validation? Note: For */ I assume that the /* has been opened some lines before.

    Read the article

  • MySQL: Check if first character is _not_ A-Z

    - by dbemerlin
    I have to create an SQL Query to get all rows starting with a specific character, except if the parameter passed to the (PHP) function is 0, in that case it should get every row that does not start with A - Z (like #0-9.,$ etc). What is the easiest and fastest way to get those rows? DB: MySQL 5.1 Column: title

    Read the article

  • check if username exists on form submit

    - by Developer
    This is my code. .js $(document).ready(function() { $("#username").focusout(function() { $.ajax({ type:'post', url:site_url()+'/client/checkUserName', data:{'username':$("#username").val()}, dataType:'json', success:function(result){ if(result != 'false'){ $('#message').text('Username exists'); } } }); }); .html <form id='form1' method="post"> <input type="text" name="username" id="username"/> <span id="message" style="color:red"></span> <input type="submit" value="submit" id="regis" class="btn"/> </form> Its working fine on focusout. How to make the form to not submit if username exists? Suppose there is a hidden field in the form say <input type="text" hidden id="type" value="<?php echo $type;?>"> Then if value exists in the hidden field then the username neednot be checked if already exists or not.

    Read the article

  • function to efficiently check a change of value in a nested hashmap

    - by zcaudate
    the motivation is for checking what has changed in a deeply nest map, kind of like a reverse of update-in. This is a simple example: (def p1 {:a {:a1 :1 :a2 :2} :b {:b1 :1 :b2 :2}}) (def p2 (update-in p1 [:a :a1] (constantly :updated)) ;; => {:a {:a1 :updated :a2 :2} ;; :b {:b1 :1 :b2 :2}} (what-changed? p1 p2) ;; => {:keys [:a :a1] :value :updated) (what-changed? p2 p1) ;; => {:keys [:a :a1] :value :2) I'm hoping that because clojure maps are persistent data-structures, there may be a smart algorithm to figure this out by looking at the underlying structure as opposed to walking through the nested maps and comparing the difference.

    Read the article

  • fastest way to check to see if a certain index in a linq statement is null

    - by tehdoommarine
    Basic Details I have a linq statement that grabs some records from a database and puts them in a System.Linq.Enumerable: var someRecords = someRepoAttachedToDatabase.Where(p=>true); Suppose this grabs tons (25k+) of records, and i need to perform operations on all of them. to speed things up, I have to decided to use paging and perform the operations needed in blocks of 100 instead of all of the records at the same time. The Question The line in question is the line where I count the number of records in the subset to see if we are on the last page; if the number of records in subset is less than the size of paging - then that means there are no more records left. What I would like to know is what is the fastest way to do this? Code in Question int pageSize = 100; bool moreData = true; int currentPage = 1; while (moreData) { var subsetOfRecords = someRecords.Skip((currentPage - 1) * pageSize).Take(pageSize); //this is also a System.Linq.Enumerable if (subsetOfRecords.Count() < pageSize){ moreData = false;} //line in question //do stuff to records in subset currentPage++; } Things I Have Considered subsetOfRecords.Count() < pageSize subsetOfRecords.ElementAt(pageSize - 1) == null (causes out of bounds exception - can catch exception and set moreData to false there) Converting subsetOfRecords to an array (converting someRecords to an array will not work due to the way subsetOfRecords is declared - but I am open to changing it) I'm sure there are plenty of other ideas that I have missed.

    Read the article

  • Multiple dropdown combination check and filter

    - by Tom
    Using Javascript / jQuery, I'm trying to build a "combination checker" that will take the values of three (but can be more) dropdown lists and filter the options based on a supplied list of allowed combinations. For example: DROPDOWNS Field 1: - value_1 - value_2 Field 2: - value_3 Field 3: - value_4 - value_5 COMBINATIONS - value_1, value_3, value_5 - value_1, value_3, value_4 - value_2, value_3, value_5 When a user selects Field 3 - value_4, the unavailable options will be disabled - ie, Field 1 - value_2 (there is no combination that allows value_2 and value_4 to be selected together). It would be really great if someone could provide some pointers on how this can be achieved or just provide a fresh perspective - I'm going round in circles on this one!

    Read the article

  • Python check if object is in list of objects

    - by John
    Hi, I have a list of objects in Python. I then have another list of objects. I want to go through the first list and see if any items appear in the second list. I thought I could simply do for item1 in list1: for item2 in list2: if item1 == item2: print "item %s in both lists" However this does not seem to work. Although if I do: if item1.title == item2.title: it works okay. I have more attributes than this though so don't really want to do 1 big if statement comparing all the attributes if I don't have to. Can anyone give me help or advise on what I can do to find the objects which appear in both lists. Thanks

    Read the article

  • I want to retrieve check items of list view

    - by kamil
    for(int i=0;i < users.size();i++) { map = new HashMap<String, String>(); map.put("id",String.valueOf(i)); map.put("userID", String.valueOf(users.get(i).getUserId())); map.put("emailID", users.get(i).getEmailAddress()); memList.add(map); } ListAdapter adapter = new SimpleAdapter(this, memList , R.layout.member_list_view, new String[] { "emailID" },new int[] { R.id.memTextView}); memberList.setAdapter(adapter); I have to retrieve the checked items on a separate button listener. how can I? I am using a customize list view. Plz help...

    Read the article

  • Bash script to (more or less) reliably check if the internet is up

    - by João Portela
    I need a bash script to put in a cron job that every minute checks if the internet is up. This is how I did it: #! /bin/sh host1=google.com host2=wikipedia.org curr_date=`date +"%Y%m%d%H%M"` echo -n "${curr_date};" ((ping -w5 -c3 $host1 || ping -w5 -c3 $host2) > /dev/null 2>&1) && echo "up" || (echo "down" && exit 1) How would you do it? Which hosts would you ping? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Infinite recursion trying to check all elements of a TreeCtrl

    - by mavnn
    I have a TreeCtrl in which more than one Item can be assigned the same object as PyData. When the object is updated, I want to update all of the items in the tree which have that object as their PyData. I thought the following code would solve the problem quite neatly, but for some reason the logical test (current != self.GetFirstVisibleItem()) always returns true leading to infinite recursion. Can anyone explain why? def RefreshNodes(self, obj, current=None): print "Entered refresh" current = current or self.GetFirstVisibleItem() if current.IsOk(): print self.GetPyData(current).name if self.GetPyData(current) == obj: self.RefreshNode(current) current = self.GetNextVisible(current) if current != self.GetFirstVisibleItem(): self.RefreshNodes(obj, current) Edit: the above is obviously part of a class based on wx.TreeCtrl

    Read the article

  • check whether fgets would block

    - by lv
    Hi, I was just wondering whether in C is it possible to peek in the input buffer or perform similar trickery to know whether a call to fgets would block at a later time. Java allows to do something like that by calling BufferedReader.ready(), this way I can implement console input something like this: while (on && in.ready()) { line = in.readLine(); /* do something with line */ if (!in.ready()) Thread.sleep(100); } this allows an external thread to gracefully shutdown the input loop by setting on to false; I'd like to perform a similar implementation in C without resorting to non portable tricks, I already know I can make a "timed out fgets" under unix by resorting to signals or (better, even though requering to take care of buffering) reimplement it on top of recv/select, but I'd prefer something that would work on windows too. TIA

    Read the article

  • How to Check Authenticity of an AJAX Request

    - by Alex Reisner
    I am designing a web site in which users solve puzzles as quickly as they can. JavaScript is used to time each puzzle, and the number of milliseconds is sent to the server via AJAX when the puzzle is completed. How can I ensure that the time received by the server was not forged by the user? I don't think a session-based authenticity token (the kind used for forms in Rails) is sufficient because I need to authenticate the source of a value, not just the legitimacy of the request. Is there a way to cryptographically sign the request? I can't think of anything that couldn't be duplicated by a hacker. Is any JavaScript, by its exposed, client-side nature, subject to tampering? Am I going to have to use something that gets compiled, like Flash? (Yikes.) Or is there some way to hide a secret key? Or something else I haven't thought of? Update: To clarify, I don't want to penalize people with slow network connections (and network speed should be considered inconsistent), so the timing needs to be 100% client-side (the timer starts only when we know the user can see the puzzle). Also, there is money involved so no amount of "trusting the user" is acceptable.

    Read the article

  • To check the default select value tag!

    - by Small Wolf
    I have a question.Here is the code! f.select(:departments,Department.all.collect{|c|[c.name,c.id]},{},:size=>10,:multiple => ture) class Emergency has many :departments end the html source like this: <select id="emergency_departments" multiple="multiple" name="emergency[departments][]" size="10"><option value ="">""</option>....</select> now I want to get the default selected tag , who can tell me how ?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64  | Next Page >