Search Results

Search found 88206 results on 3529 pages for 'code coverage'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 579/3529 | < Previous Page | 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586  | Next Page >

  • Web Animations - the next generation

    Web Animations - the next generation The GDL event page for this event: developers.google.com Ask and vote for questions at www.google.com Browser developers are designing the next generation of animation features that will enhance HTML5 with rich, powerful new animation primitives. Designers and web app developers will all benefit from improved methods of animating content. Hear from developers of Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox how this works, and learn how to try out the new animation features now in your favorite browser. From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 0 3 ratings Time: 30:00 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • "Collection Wrapper" pattern - is this common?

    - by Prog
    A different question of mine had to do with encapsulating member data structures inside classes. In order to understand this question better please read that question and look at the approach discussed. One of the guys who answered that question said that the approach is good, but if I understood him correctly - he said that there should be a class existing just for the purpose of wrapping the collection, instead of an ordinary class offering a number of public methods just to access the member collection. For example, instead of this: class SomeClass{ // downright exposing the concrete collection. Things[] someCollection; // other stuff omitted Thing[] getCollection(){return someCollection;} } Or this: class SomeClass{ // encapsulating the collection, but inflating the class' public interface. Thing[] someCollection; // class functionality omitted. public Thing getThing(int index){ return someCollection[index]; } public int getSize(){ return someCollection.length; } public void setThing(int index, Thing thing){ someCollection[index] = thing; } public void removeThing(int index){ someCollection[index] = null; } } We'll have this: // encapsulating the collection - in a different class, dedicated to this. class SomeClass{ CollectionWrapper someCollection; CollectionWrapper getCollection(){return someCollection;} } class CollectionWrapper{ Thing[] someCollection; public Thing getThing(int index){ return someCollection[index]; } public int getSize(){ return someCollection.length; } public void setThing(int index, Thing thing){ someCollection[index] = thing; } public void removeThing(int index){ someCollection[index] = null; } } This way, the inner data structure in SomeClass can change without affecting client code, and without forcing SomeClass to offer a lot of public methods just to access the inner collection. CollectionWrapper does this instead. E.g. if the collection changes from an array to a List, the internal implementation of CollectionWrapper changes, but client code stays the same. Also, the CollectionWrapper can hide certain things from the client code - from example, it can disallow mutation to the collection by not having the methods setThing and removeThing. This approach to decoupling client code from the concrete data structure seems IMHO pretty good. Is this approach common? What are it's downfalls? Is this used in practice?

    Read the article

  • list and explanations of ways to boost this router's signal strength? [closed]

    - by barlop
    Possible Duplicates: Improve Wireless Signal How to get wireless coverage over my whole house? What's the best way to increase the range of my 802.11g router? The back of my house doesn't have WiFi Signal I'm interested in ways that are both specific to certain routers, and generic. When I say generic, I don't necessarily mean a one way that works for many.. but it can also be a generic answer, so mentioning solutions for different situations. So not just the one router I mention. Explanations are important, as well as all the ways. One i'm particularly interested in boosting the strength of is this wireless router/modem Netgear VMDG280 maybe anywhere in a big house with three floors, maybe from the garden.

    Read the article

  • Apps Script Office Hours - October 18, 2012

    Apps Script Office Hours - October 18, 2012 In this episode Ikai and Arun talk about this week's Apps Script news, a Twillio integration and demo, and answer questions from developers on topics such as: - An issue with Apps Script gadgets on Google Sites with custom domains. - Determining the maximum number of objects that can fit in ScriptDB. - Backing up scripts to an outside file store. From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 30 8 ratings Time: 29:14 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586  | Next Page >