Search Results

Search found 88950 results on 3558 pages for 'crazy code'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 583/3558 | < Previous Page | 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590  | Next Page >

  • WebService DIME Bridge

    The DIME Bridge transferring a web service response (any serializable object) in the binary format across the Internet. It's a full transparent loosely coupled solution between the web service and its consumer - just injecting the bridge in their config files.

    Read the article

  • Release Notes for 11/20/2012

    The CodePlex team deployed a few times over the last week. Below is a roll-up of changes: Fixed issue with being able add additional commits to pull requests - Thanks to Oren Novotny Fixed problem with issue summaries breaking within words - Thanks to Jeff Handley and SoonDead Corrected inconsistencies between the time displayed on the history page and previous versions page for Git/Hg commits. Fixed perma-link issue when linking to forks. - Thanks to Scott Blomquist Fixed problem with connecting via Windows Live Writer - Thanks to yufeih Fixed source browsing problem when folders have special characters. Fixed AppHarbor service hooks for Mercurial projects. Have ideas on how to improve CodePlex? Please visit our suggestions page! Vote for existing ideas or submit a new one. As always you can reach out to the CodePlex team on Twitter @codeplex or reach me directly @mgroves84

    Read the article

  • Using Git with TFS projects

    If you having been following the updates to CodePlex over the last several months you will have noticed that we added support for Git source control. It is important to the CodePlex team to enable developers to use the source control system that supports their development style whether it is distributed version control or centralized version control. There are many projects on CodePlex that are using TFS centralized version control. But we continue to see more and more developers interested in using Git. Last week Brian Harry announced a new open source project called Git-TF. Git-TF is a client side bridge that enabled developer to use Git locally and push to a remote backed by Team Foundation version control. Git-TF also works great for TFS based projects on CodePlex. You may already be familiar with git-tfs. Git-TFS is a similar client side bridge between Git and TFS. Git-TFS works great if you are on Windows since it depends on the TFS .Net client object model. Git-TF adds the ability to use a Git to TFS bridge on multiple platforms since it is written in Java. You can use it on Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows, etc. Since you are connecting to a TFS Server when using Git-TF make sure you use your CodePlex TFS account name: snd\YOUR_USERNAME_cp along with your password. At this point, you will need to be a member of the project to connect using Git-TF. Resources Git-TF Getting Started Guide Download: Git-TF Git-TF Source on CodePlex

    Read the article

  • Release Notes for 8/16/2012

    Below are the release notes for today's deployment. Source Tab Improvements Revamped fork navigation to make it more clear that you are within a fork verses the parent project. Infrastructure Updated CodePlex to ASP.Net MVC 4.0. RTM+1 how's that for a turnaround? Bug Fixes Fixed a set of user experience issues with the in-line diff view experience. Fixed issue with date mismatches between UTC and local time for discussions and issue tracker Fixed issue where new issues would not show up in search results. Changed the default destination branch for pull requests to master. Have ideas on how to improve CodePlex? Please visit our suggestions page! Vote for existing ideas or submit a new one. As always you can reach out to the CodePlex team on Twitter @codeplex or reach me directly @mgroves84

    Read the article

  • Classic vs universal and loss of historical data

    - by iss42
    I'm keen to use some of the new features in Google Universal Analytics. I have an old site though that I don't want to lose the historical data for. The comparisons with historical data are interesting for example. However Google doesn't appear to allow you to change a property from the classic code to the new code. Am I missing something? I'm surprised this isn't a bigger issue for many other users.

    Read the article

  • Web Animations - the next generation

    Web Animations - the next generation The GDL event page for this event: developers.google.com Ask and vote for questions at www.google.com Browser developers are designing the next generation of animation features that will enhance HTML5 with rich, powerful new animation primitives. Designers and web app developers will all benefit from improved methods of animating content. Hear from developers of Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox how this works, and learn how to try out the new animation features now in your favorite browser. From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 0 3 ratings Time: 30:00 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • "Collection Wrapper" pattern - is this common?

    - by Prog
    A different question of mine had to do with encapsulating member data structures inside classes. In order to understand this question better please read that question and look at the approach discussed. One of the guys who answered that question said that the approach is good, but if I understood him correctly - he said that there should be a class existing just for the purpose of wrapping the collection, instead of an ordinary class offering a number of public methods just to access the member collection. For example, instead of this: class SomeClass{ // downright exposing the concrete collection. Things[] someCollection; // other stuff omitted Thing[] getCollection(){return someCollection;} } Or this: class SomeClass{ // encapsulating the collection, but inflating the class' public interface. Thing[] someCollection; // class functionality omitted. public Thing getThing(int index){ return someCollection[index]; } public int getSize(){ return someCollection.length; } public void setThing(int index, Thing thing){ someCollection[index] = thing; } public void removeThing(int index){ someCollection[index] = null; } } We'll have this: // encapsulating the collection - in a different class, dedicated to this. class SomeClass{ CollectionWrapper someCollection; CollectionWrapper getCollection(){return someCollection;} } class CollectionWrapper{ Thing[] someCollection; public Thing getThing(int index){ return someCollection[index]; } public int getSize(){ return someCollection.length; } public void setThing(int index, Thing thing){ someCollection[index] = thing; } public void removeThing(int index){ someCollection[index] = null; } } This way, the inner data structure in SomeClass can change without affecting client code, and without forcing SomeClass to offer a lot of public methods just to access the inner collection. CollectionWrapper does this instead. E.g. if the collection changes from an array to a List, the internal implementation of CollectionWrapper changes, but client code stays the same. Also, the CollectionWrapper can hide certain things from the client code - from example, it can disallow mutation to the collection by not having the methods setThing and removeThing. This approach to decoupling client code from the concrete data structure seems IMHO pretty good. Is this approach common? What are it's downfalls? Is this used in practice?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590  | Next Page >