Search Results

Search found 36788 results on 1472 pages for 'sql 2008'.

Page 588/1472 | < Previous Page | 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595  | Next Page >

  • SQL Trigger Need to set x from a value

    - by Eric
    Im stuck on a the type of trigger needed to for this constraint. I will have a price and a commission. The price determines the commission amount, < 100 - 4%, < 200 - 5% etc. My idea. the database contains a separate table that will hold 4 price values , 101, 201, 401, 601, with their own matching comission %, this will be called PC. When i create a property listing i want to calculate the commission they earn depending on the price entered. on insert, i need to check the new.price and compare it to the prices in PC. Once new.price is less than the price tuple, i set the price to that commission value create or replace TRIGGER findCommission BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON HASLISTING FOR each ROW BEGIN IF (:NEW.ASKING_PRICE < 100001) THEN :NEW.COMMISSION = 6.0; END IF; IF (:NEW.ASKING_PRICE < 250001) THEN :NEW.COMMISSION = 5.5; END IF; IF (:NEW.ASKING_PRICE < 1000001) THEN :NEW.COMMISSION = 5.0; END IF; IF (:NEW.ASKING_PRICE > 1000000) THEN :NEW.COMMISSION = 4.0; END IF; END;

    Read the article

  • check for null date in CASE statement, where have I gone wrong?

    - by James.Elsey
    Hello, My source table looks like this Id StartDate 1 (null) 2 12/12/2009 3 10/10/2009 I want to create a select statement, that selects the above, but also has an additional column to display a varchar if the date is not null such as : Id StartDate StartDateStatus 1 (null) Awaiting 2 12/12/2009 Approved 3 10/10/2009 Approved I have the following in my select, but it doesn't seem to be working. All of the statuses are set to Approved even though the dates have some nulls select id, StartDate, CASE StartDate WHEN null THEN 'Awaiting' ELSE 'Approved' END AS StartDateStatus FROM myTable The results of my query look like : Id StartDate StartDateStatus 1 (null) Approved 2 12/12/2009 Approved 3 10/10/2009 Approved 4 (null) Approved 5 (null) Approved StartDate is a smalldatetime, is there some exception to how this should be treated? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Php function within SQL statement syntax

    - by Vafello
    I have the following code. I would like username to take the value of the getUserName function however I am fighting with syntax. Can anybody tell me what should be the correct one? $query = "SELECT user FROM users_entity WHERE username = getUserName()";

    Read the article

  • Sql string adding problem

    - by Woland
    SELECT a.one + ' test ' +b.two from table1 a right join table1 on a.id =b.id The problem is that when one is null then it the whole string is null, is there some kind of trick to bypass this problem msSQL 2005

    Read the article

  • question about adding another column to a sql statement

    - by every_answer_gets_a_point
    i am starting with this table: SELECT [Lab Occurrence Form].[Practice Code], [Lab Occurrence Form].[1 0 Preanalytical (Before Testing)], Count([Lab Occurrence Form].[1 0 Preanalytical (Before Testing)]) AS [CountOf1 0 Preanalytical (Before Testing)] FROM [Lab Occurrence Form] WHERE ((([Lab Occurrence Form].[Occurrence Date]) Between [Forms]![By Number]![Text4] And [Forms]![By Number]![Text2])) GROUP BY [Lab Occurrence Form].[Practice Code], [Lab Occurrence Form].[1 0 Preanalytical (Before Testing)] HAVING ((([Lab Occurrence Form].[Practice Code])<>"") AND ((Count([Lab Occurrence Form].[1 0 Preanalytical (Before Testing)]))<>0)); it selects 3 columns but i need to aggregate the comments and put it in the fourth column where the first two values are the same

    Read the article

  • SQL Exception error??

    - by Kyle Sevenoaks
    I just came into work and found this where our site should be: SQLException ERROR: connect failed [Native Error: Host 'linux7.fastname.no' is blocked because of many connection errors; unblock with 'mysqladmin flush-hosts'] [User Info: Array] What does it mean? www.euroworker.no

    Read the article

  • Combining IN and NOT IN in SQL as single result

    - by UltraVi01
    I apologize for the vague title. I am attempting to write a query that returns an alias column with matching values (resulting from an IN) as well as an alias column with values that do not match (using NOT IN). I want the result set to have: userId | matches | nonmatches. I currently have the following query which returns the matches as expected. I am having trouble getting the nonmatches in the result set -- that is, from a NOT IN statement SET @userId = 9; SELECT ug.user_id, COUNT(DISTINCT goal_id) as matches FROM user_goal ug WHERE ug.user_id!=@userId AND goal_id IN (SELECT iug.goal_id FROM user_goal iug WHERE user_id=@userId) GROUP BY user_id ORDER BY matches DESC LIMIT 4 So, the NOT IN would look something like this: goal_id NOT IN(SELECT uggg.goal_id FROM user_goal uggg WHERE user_id=@userId) AS nonmatches I am just not sure how to incorporate the NOT IN statement in my query so I get all the results

    Read the article

  • SQL Server > Query > Column Names

    - by pojomx
    Hi, I'm here again- I have something like this Select A.a, A.b, A.a+A.b as c, (A.a+A.b*2)+A.d as d from Table But i want to know, if it is possible, to make it work with something like this: Select A.a,A.b,A.a+A.b as c, (c*2)+A.d as d from Table Thank you

    Read the article

  • saving an image object in sql server database from action method

    - by user3532152
    [HttpPost] public void Test(HttpPostedFileBase file) { UsersContext db = new UsersContext(); byte[] image = new byte[file.ContentLength]; file.InputStream.Read(image, 0, image.Length); CrimeReport i = new CrimeReport { ImageId=1, ImageName="Anjli",ImageContent = image, Active=true }; db.CrimeReports.Add(i); db.SaveChanges(); } I am getting an exception on db.CrimeReports.Add(i);

    Read the article

  • SQL more elegant combination of boolean checks possible?

    - by Matze
    Call me pedantic but is there a more elegant way to combine all those checks? SELECT * FROM [TABLE1] WHERE [path] = 'RECEIVE' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE '10.48.20.10' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE '0.%' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE '127.%' ORDER BY [date],[time] DESC; To something like this: SELECT * FROM [TABLE1] WHERE [path] = 'RECEIVE' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE IN ('10.48.20.10','0.%','127.%', .... ) ORDER BY [date],[time] DESC;

    Read the article

  • SQL 2000 xp_sendmail

    - by Steven
    Hi Guys, I have a trigger that sends an email once a value has been changed. It works when i make any amendments but when the users make the changes it fails. I have figured out the users havnt got permission to send mails in master.dbo.xp_sendmail The way the DB was originally setup wis shocking!! (each user has a network login rather than being part of a network group) Is there anyway i can allow a role in customerDb to access the xp_sendmail proc in the mater db? Thanks Sp

    Read the article

  • sql exception handling

    - by christine33990
    CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE p_createLocaltable IS table_already_exist EXCEPTION; PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT (table_already_exist, -00955); BEGIN create table local_table as select * from supplied_table where rownum < 1; EXCEPTION when table_already_exist then DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('Table already exists , does not need to recreate it'); END; can anyone see any problem of the above code?

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2005 Transactions

    - by mcallec
    I have a long running stored proc (approx 30 mins) which is currently running within a transaction (isolation level snapshot). I've set the transaction to snapshot to avoid locking records preventing other processes from accessing the data. What I'm trying to do is write to and read from a status table, but although we're in a transaction I'd like to write to and read from the status table as if I'm not in a transaction. I need this so that other processes can read any updates to this table by my stored proc, and this stored proc can also read any inserts made by other processes. I realise that having my entire stored proc running within a transaction isn't recommended, but this has been done for other reasons and we need to stick with that approach. So my question is within a transaction, is it possible to execute a query or call a stored proc which effectively isn't enlisted in the transaction?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595  | Next Page >