Search Results

Search found 22025 results on 881 pages for 'jquery filter'.

Page 590/881 | < Previous Page | 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597  | Next Page >

  • How to drop a sortable block?

    - by Pentium10
    I have a list which is reordered using sortable. I defined a trash can div, and I want to achieve that when the blocks are dropped on this div to get deleted. So far I can't seam to fine the way to fire the drop event, when I release the item gets back to his previous position. I have this code: $(document).ready(function() { var order = null; $("#order-list").load(location.href+" #order-list>*",""); $("#order-list").sortable({ handle : '.handle', update : function (e, ui) { order = $(this).sortable('serialize'); $("#info").load("process-sortable.php?"+order); } }); }); and $("#trashcan").droppable({ drop: function(event, ui) { draggedid = ui.draggable.attr('id'); alert(draggedid); // doesn't fire $.get("process-add-subcat.php", { "action" : "delete_subcategory", "draggedid": draggedid }, function(data){ }); } });

    Read the article

  • optimized search using ajax and keypress

    - by ooo
    i have the following code as i want to search a database as a user is typing into a textbox. This code below works fine but it seems a little inefficient as if a user is typing really fast, i am potentially doing many more searches than necessary. So if a user is typing in "sailing" i am searching on "sail", "saili", "sailin", and "sailing" i wanted to see if there was a way to detect any particular time between keypresses so only search if user stops typing for 500 milliseconds or something like this. is there a best practices for something like this? $('#searchString').keypress(function(e) { if (e.keyCode == 13) { var url = '/Tracker/Search/' + $("#searchString").val(); $.get(url, function(data) { $('div#results').html(data); $('#results').show(); }); } else { var existingString = $("#searchString").val(); if (existingString.length > 2) { var url = '/Tracker/Search/' + existingString; $.get(url, function(data) { $('div#results').html(data); $('#results').show(); }); } }

    Read the article

  • Better alternatives to know whether a control is valid in javascript?

    - by Anthony
    I want to know whether a control is valid or not in javascript. Is there a direct client side API available in Asp.Net which can tell me whether a control is valid or not? Eg. If I have 2 validators attached to a textbox, I need a function that can tell me whether the textbox is valid or not. If even 1 validator is not valid then it should return false. I can't seem to find a function that can give me this. Here is a little helper that I wrote which does the job but is inefficient: function isControlValid(control) { for (i = 0; i < Page_Validators.length; i++) { var validator = Page_Validators[i]; var controlId = validator.controltovalidate; if ($(control).attr('id') == controlId && validator.isvalid == false) { return false; } } return true; } Anybody has any better alternatives?

    Read the article

  • How to move an anonymous function out

    - by cf_PhillipSenn
    I have a $.ajax call with an error callback: error: function(result){ $('#msg').text(result.statusText).addClass('err'); } I'd like to change it to a more generic: error: myError(result) And then all by itself: function myError(theError){ $('#msg').text(theError.statusText).addClass('err'); } But firebug is telling me "result" is not defined.

    Read the article

  • MVC4 not binding a list of basic types

    - by admanb
    I cannot, for the life of me, get this data to bind. Here's my JavaScript: var params = { 'InvItemIDs': ["188475", "188490"]}; $.post("api/Orders/OrderFromInventory?" + $.param(params)) and the Controller action: public HttpResponseMessage OrderFromInventory(IList<int> InvItemIDs) { return new HttpResponseMessage(); } I've built the query string so that it's sending: ?InvItemIDs=188475&InvItemIDs=188490 as well as ?InvItemIDs[]=188475&InvItemIDs[]=188490 and even ?InvItemIDs[0]=188475&InvItemIDs[1]=188490 and none of them are binding. InvItemIDs is always null. What am I doing wrong? EDIT: So it turns out all this is a bug (or something) in the new Web API controller code in MVC4. As soon as I moved the exact same code over to a standard controller it started working. I'm still interested if anyone has any insight as to why the Web API would break this binding.

    Read the article

  • Overlapping elements stop overlapping in IE7 on class change

    - by Gazzer
    On this page http://zenchan.com/program/ When I rollover the right box 2nd from the top suddenly the overlapping (negative margin disappears). What's happening is that a 'hover' class is being added to shift the background sprite. The two yellow boxes are debugging: if the hover class is put their in advance there is no problem. So fundamentally the CSS is not a problem for IE7 but adding the class is. Any ideas what's causing this. I've tried adding haslayout to various elements but to little effect.

    Read the article

  • Display custom field if it has content or hide if not

    - by fxg
    I'm display a custom field this way: <div class="blog_text"> <img src="<?php the_field('imagen_prensa'); ?>" /> </div> I would like to make the img appear only if the user has uploaded an image, because right now if there is no image appear the symbol of broken image. I have tried with this but it doesn't work: <?php if (get_field('imagen_prensa') != ''): ?> <img src="<?php the_field('imagen_prensa'); ?>" /> <?php endif; ?> Any idea on the way to achieve it?

    Read the article

  • Links in rounded boxes? In ALL browsers (yep included IE8)

    - by raffaello123
    I tried maaaany script but every time I get stuck in something bad. My goal is to create rounded boxes for links. You can see an example of I'm talking about here in the read more link (effects not necessary). Very common I know, but I want to make it work in eeeevery browsers at least safari, FF, chrome and most important IE7+ (IE6 not necessary...). The script that took me closest to the solution is Cornerz but I can't fix a very bad issue on IE8. Does anybody knows a way to get rid of this or to achieve my goal? Thank you I appreciate every support. Cheers

    Read the article

  • Insert something .after a set of elements if the first in the set has a certain class.

    - by Adripants
    I would like to add a label AFTER a group of radio inputs IF the first has a certain class <label>Has the strategy and all of it's relevant background documents been uploaded</label> <label for="Radio1"><input type="radio" name="uploaded" class="required cat1" id="Radio1">Yes</label> <label for="Radio2"><input type="radio" name="uploaded" id="Radio2">No</label> Radio1 has the class, but I'd like to insert a label after the last (in this case Radio2) I thought I could use this: $('input[type="radio"].cat1').siblings('input:last').after('<label>Hi!</label>'); But it doesn't work. Can you pick what I am doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • 'Best' way to pull data relative to a div?

    - by acidzombie24
    This answer suggested i should put my data in JS instead of a textarea. Thinking about it i could have scripts and do something like myarray[i]="data" where i is the index of my for loop. However when i click a div how do i find out what i is? I have used var data = $(this).parent('.parent').find('.valuestr').eq(0).val(); which is extremely simple. Should i use a script or should i continue to do it with a textarea? if i should use a script 1) Whats the easiest way to find i and 2) Is it bad pratice to have dozens or hundreds of <script> in my html? or i can go through the loop twice but i still dont know the easiest way to find i. I would have to store it somewhere or go through multiple tags and count them.

    Read the article

  • return false is not working in my submit click

    - by kumar
    Hello friends. this is the code i am using for my Html.BeginForm.. $('#PbtnSubmit').click(function() { $('#PricingEditExceptions input[name=PMchk]').each(function() { if ($("#PricingEditExceptions input:checkbox:checked").length > 0) { var checked = $('#PricingEditExceptions input[type=checkbox]:checked'); var PMstrIDs = checked.map(function() { return $(this).val(); }).get().join(','); $('#1_exceptiontypes').attr('value', exceptiontypes) $('#1_PMstrIDs').attr('value', PMstrIDs); } else { alert("Please select atleast one exception"); return false; } }); }); in else blcok my return false is not working after alert mesage also its going to my controler? thanks is this right? i tried like this $('#PbtnSubmit').click(function() { $('#PricingEditExceptions input[name=PMchk]').each(function() { if ($("#PricingEditExceptions input:checkbox:checked").length > 0) { var checked = $('#PricingEditExceptions input[type=checkbox]:checked'); var PMstrIDs = checked.map(function() { return $(this).val(); }).get().join(','); $('#1_exceptiontypes').attr('value', exceptiontypes) $('#1_PMstrIDs').attr('value', PMstrIDs); } else { alert("Please select atleast one exception"); } }); return false; }); if i do like this on submit its doing nothing.. thanks

    Read the article

  • how to make condition on selection of checkbox in user controler

    - by kumar
    I have a user control <input id="check" type="checkbox" /> <label>&nbsp;</label> <fieldset class="clearfix" id="fieldset-exception"> <legend>Student Information</legend> <div class="fiveper"> <label for="StudentID"> Exception ID: <span><%=Html.EditorFor(x => x.studentid)%></span> </label> <label for="Classroom"> Origination: <span><%=Html.EditorFor(model => model.Classroom)%></span> </label> <label for="Subject"> Age: <span><%=Html.EditorFor(model => model.subject)%></span> </label> </div> $('#btnAll').click(function() { $('#Details input[type=checkbox]').attr('checked', 'checked'); }); I am checking all checkboxes using above code but I need to make condition here that user need to select atleast one checkbox to do something? i have other button to go other page based on this checkbox checked? can anybody tell me how to check that and how to make that condition here? Thanks thanks

    Read the article

  • Trying to condense javascript into for loop

    - by rod
    I've got the following code that I am trying to condense to a for loop but am having no luck: $("#motion1-sub1-1").hover( function () { $("#motion1-sub1-1 div").show(); }, function () { $("#motion1-sub1-1 div").hide(); } ); $("#motion1-sub1-2").hover( function () { $("#motion1-sub1-2 div").show(); }, function () { $("#motion1-sub1-2 div").hide(); } ); $("#motion1-sub1-3").hover( function () { $("#motion1-sub1-3 div").show(); }, function () { $("#motion1-sub1-3 div").hide(); } ); $("#motion1-sub1-4").hover( function () { $("#motion1-sub1-4 div").show(); }, function () { $("#motion1-sub1-4 div").hide(); } ); $("#motion1-sub1-5").hover( function () { $("#motion1-sub1-5 div").show(); }, function () { $("#motion1-sub1-5 div").hide(); } ); Here's the for loop code that have to condense the above code: for (var i = 1; i <= 5; i++) { $("motion1-sub1-" + i).hover( function () { $("motion1-sub1-" + i + "div").show(); }, function () { $("motion1-sub1-" + i + "div").hide(); } ); }

    Read the article

  • About Web service ,how to use Ajax to call a specific member function of a class?

    - by Liu chwen
    I'm trying to build a web service by PHP. In my case, I called the getINFO(), but the return value on client side always null. Have no idea to solve this problem.. Here's the SOAPserver code(WS.WEB_s.php): require("WEB_s.php"); ini_set("soap.wsdl_cache_enabled", 0); $server = new SoapServer('wsdl/WEB_s.wsdl'); $server->setClass("WEB_s"); $server->handle(); Where the main Class is(WEB_s.php): final class WEB_s { public function getINFO(){ $JsonOutput = '{"key":"value",...}'; return $JsonOutput; } public function setWAN($setCommand,$newConfigfilePath){ $bOutput; return $bOutput; } } And Client side: $(document).ready(function(){ $('#qqq').button().click(function(){ var soapMessage = LoginSoap($('#uid').val(),$('#pwd').val()); alert('soapMessage'); $.ajax({ //url: 'libraries/WS.WEB_s.php/WEB_s/getINFO',//success , return null //url: 'libraries/WS.WEB_s.php/', //success , return null url: 'libraries/WS.WEB_s.php/getINFO',//success , return null type: 'GET', timeout: (10* 1000), contentType: "text/xml", dataType: "xml", success: function( data,textStatus,jqXHR){ alert('Server success(' + data+')('+ textStatus + ')(' + jqXHR + ')'); }, error: function (request, status, error) { alert('Server Error(' + status+')->'+error); }, complete: function (jqXHR, textStatus) { alert('Server success(' + jqXHR+')('+ textStatus + ')'); } }); }); }); The following is the corresponding WSDL file : http://codepaste.net/95wq9b

    Read the article

  • looping through new div as they are created

    - by eknown
    I have a div, let's call it class="phoneNo". Inside the div there are two links, one to add another div just like it, and another to delete the div itself. I'm trying to create a loop where if there's only 1 of these divs, the "delete" link should hide, and if there are more than 1 of these divs, the "delete" link should show up on all the divs. So far I came up with this, but no success: var pCount = $(".phoneNo").length; $(pCount).each(function(){ if (pCount <= 1) { $("a.deleteThis").hide(); } else if (pCount >= 1) { $("a.deleteThis").show(); } return true; });

    Read the article

  • Calling a Function Based on a String Which Contains the Function Name

    - by Phonethics
    var foo1,foo2; switch (fn) { case "fade" : foo1 = "fadeOut"; foo2 = "fadeIn"; break; case "slide" : foo1 = "slideUp"; foo2 = "slideDown"; break; } eval("$('.cls1')." + foo1 + "();"); currentSlideIndex = currentSlideIndex + n; eval("$('.cls1')." + foo2 + "();"); Any better way to achieve this without using eval ? Im not a very big fan of using eval unless absolutely necessary.

    Read the article

  • Bind event to right mouse click

    - by zac
    How can I trigger some action with right click after disabling the browser context menu ? I tried this . . . $(document).ready(function(){ $(document).bind("contextmenu",function(e){ return false; $('.alert').fadeToggle(); }); }); .alert { visibility: hidden; }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597  | Next Page >