Search Results

Search found 27530 results on 1102 pages for 'sql truncate'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 617/1102 | < Previous Page | 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624  | Next Page >

  • Query next/previous record

    - by Rob
    I'm trying to find a better way to get the next or previous record from a table. Let's say I have a blog or news table: CREATE TABLE news ( news_id INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT, news_datestamp DATETIME NOT NULL, news_author VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL, news_title VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL, news_text MEDIUMTEXT NOT NULL ); Now on the frontend I want navigation buttons for the next or previous records, if i'm sorting by news_id, I can do something rather simple like: SELECT MIN(news_id) AS next_news_id FROM news WHERE news_id > '$old_news_id' LIMIT 1 SELECT MAX(news_id) AS prev_news_id FROM news WHERE news_id < '$old_news_id' LIMIT 1 But the news can be sorted by any field, and I don't necessarily know which field is sorted on, so this won't work if the user sorts on news_author for example. I've resorted to the rather ugly and inefficient method of sorting the entire table and looping through all records until I find the record I need. $res = mysql_query("SELECT news_id FROM news ORDER BY `$sort_column` $sort_way"); $found = $prev = $next = 0; while(list($id) = mysql_fetch_row($res)) { if($found) { $next = $id; break; } if($id == $old_news_id) { $found = true; continue; } $prev = $id; } There's got to be a better way.

    Read the article

  • writing an Dynamic query in sqlserver

    - by prince23
    hi, DECLARE @sqlCommand varchar(1000) DECLARE @columnList varchar(75) DECLARE @city varchar(75) DECLARE @region varchar(75) SET @columnList = 'first_name, last_name, city' SET @city = '''London''' SET @region = '''South''' SET @sqlCommand = 'SELECT ' + @columnList + ' FROM dbo.employee WHERE City = ' + @city and 'region = '+@region --and 'region = '+@region print(@sqlCommand) EXEC (@sqlCommand) when i run this command i get an error Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 8 Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'and'. and help would great thank you

    Read the article

  • any practices ,samples for ERD?

    - by just_name
    Q: I wanna any web sites , any books just for training on ERD and normalization ,, i wanna a lot of samples ,practices,and case studies with recommended answers, to strength myself in database design.and avoid the poor data base design i made . note:i don't need books to explain the concepts , what i need is practices ,examples,case studies with recommended answers. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Array not showing in Jlist but filled in console

    - by OVERTONE
    Hey there. been a busy debugger today. ill give ths short version. ive made an array list that takes names from a database. then i put the contents of the arraylist into an array of strings. now i want too display the arrays contents in a JList. the weird thing is it was working earlier. and ive two methods. ones just a little practice too make sure i was adding to the Jlist correctly. so heres the key codes. this is the layout of my code. variables constructor methods in my variables i have these 3 defined String[] contactListNames = new String[5]; ArrayList<String> rowNames = new ArrayList<String>(); JList contactList = new JList(contactListNames); simple enough. in my constructor i have them again. contactListNames = new String[5]; contactList = new JList(contactListNames); //i dont have the array list defined though. printSqlDetails(); // the prinSqldetails was too make sure that the connectionw as alright. and its working fine. fillContactList(); // this is the one thats causing me grief. its where all the work happens. // fillContactListTest(); // this was the tester that makes sure its adding to the list alright. heres the code for fillContactListTest() public void fillContactListTest() { for(int i = 0;i<3;i++) { try { String contact; System.out.println(" please fill the list at index "+ i); Scanner in = new Scanner(System.in); contact = in.next(); contactListNames[i] = contact; in.nextLine(); } catch(Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } heres the main one thats supposed too work. public void fillContactList() { int i =0; createConnection(); ArrayList<String> rowNames = new ArrayList<String>(); try { Statement stmt = conn.createStatement(); ResultSet namesList = stmt.executeQuery("SELECT name FROM Users"); try { while (namesList.next()) { rowNames.add(namesList.getString(1)); contactListNames =(String[])rowNames.toArray(new String[rowNames.size()]); // this used to print out contents of array list // System.out.println("" + rowNames); while(i<contactListNames.length) { System.out.println(" " + contactListNames[i]); i++; } } } catch(SQLException q) { q.printStackTrace(); } conn.commit(); stmt.close(); conn.close(); } catch(SQLException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } i really need help here. im at my wits end. i just cant see why the first method would add to the JList no problem. but the second one wont. both the contactListNames array and array list can print fine and have the names in them. but i must be transfering them too the jlist wrong. please help p.s im aware this is long. but trust me its the short version.

    Read the article

  • How to SELECT DISTINCT Info with TOP 1 Info and an Order By FROM the Top 1 Info

    - by Erin Taylor
    I have 2 tables, that look like: CustomerInfo(CustomterID, CustomerName) CustomerReviews(ReviewID, CustomerID, Review, Score) I want to search reviews for a string and return CustomerInfo.CustomerID and CustomerInfo.CustomerName. However, I only want to show distinct CustomerID and CustomerName along with just one of their CustomerReviews.Reviews and CustomerReviews.Score. I also want to order by the CustomerReviews.Score. I can't figure out how to do this, since a customer can leave multiple reviews, but I only want a list of customers with their highest scored review. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • How to select only the first rows for each unique value of a column

    - by nuit9
    Let's say I have a table of customer addresses: CName | AddressLine ------------------------------- John Smith | 123 Nowheresville Jane Doe | 456 Evergreen Terrace John Smith | 999 Somewhereelse Joe Bloggs | 1 Second Ave In the table, one customer like John Smith can have multiple addresses. I need the select query for this table to return only first row found where there are duplicates in 'CName'. For this table it should return all rows except the 3rd (or 1st - any of those two addresses are okay but only one can be returned). Is there a keyword I can add to the SELECT query to filter based on whether the server has already seen the column value before?

    Read the article

  • Stored procedure error when use computed column for ID

    - by Hari
    I got the error: Procedure or function usp_User_Info3 has too many arguments specified When I run the program. I don't know the error in SP or in C# code. I have to display the Vendor_ID after the user clicks the submit button. Where the thing going wrong here ? Table structure : CREATE TABLE User_Info3 ( SNo int Identity (2000,1) , Vendor_ID AS 'VEN' + CAST(SNo as varchar(16)) PERSISTED PRIMARY KEY, UserName VARCHAR(16) NOT NULL, User_Password VARCHAR(12) NOT NULL, User_ConPassword VARCHAR(12) NOT NULL, User_FirstName VARCHAR(25) NOT NULL, User_LastName VARCHAR(25) SPARSE NULL, User_Title VARCHAR(35) NOT NULL, User_EMail VARCHAR(35) NOT NULL, User_PhoneNo VARCHAR(14) NOT NULL, User_MobileNo VARCHAR(14)NOT NULL, User_FaxNo VARCHAR(14)NOT NULL, UserReg_Date DATE DEFAULT GETDATE() ) Stored Procedure : ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[usp_User_Info3] @SNo INT OUTPUT, @Vendor_ID VARCHAR(10) OUTPUT, @UserName VARCHAR(30), @User_Password VARCHAR(12), @User_ConPassword VARCHAR(12), @User_FirstName VARCHAR(25), @User_LastName VARCHAR(25), @User_Title VARCHAR(35), @User_OtherEmail VARCHAR(30), @User_PhoneNo VARCHAR(14), @User_MobileNo VARCHAR(14), @User_FaxNo VARCHAR(14) AS BEGIN SET NOCOUNT ON; INSERT INTO User_Info3 (UserName,User_Password,User_ConPassword,User_FirstName, User_LastName,User_Title,User_OtherEmail,User_PhoneNo,User_MobileNo,User_FaxNo) VALUES (@UserName,@User_Password,@User_ConPassword,@User_FirstName,@User_LastName, @User_Title,@User_OtherEmail,@User_PhoneNo,@User_MobileNo,@User_FaxNo) SET @SNo = Scope_Identity() SELECT Vendor_ID From User_Info3 WHERE SNo = @SNo END C# Code : protected void BtnUserNext_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure; cmd.CommandText = "usp_User_Info3"; System.Data.SqlClient.SqlParameter SNo=cmd.Parameters.Add("@SNo",System.Data.SqlDbType.Int); System.Data.SqlClient.SqlParameter Vendor_ID=cmd.Parameters.Add("@Vendor_ID", System.Data.SqlDbType.VarChar,10); cmd.Parameters.Add("@UserName", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value = txtUserName.Text; cmd.Parameters.Add("@User_Password", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value = txtRegPassword.Text; cmd.Parameters.Add("@User_ConPassword", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value = txtRegConPassword.Text; cmd.Parameters.Add("@User_FirstName", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value = txtRegFName.Text; cmd.Parameters.Add("@User_LastName", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value = txtRegLName.Text; cmd.Parameters.Add("@User_Title", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value = txtRegTitle.Text; cmd.Parameters.Add("@User_OtherEmail", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value = txtOtherEmail.Text; cmd.Parameters.Add("@User_PhoneNo", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value =txtRegTelephone.Text; cmd.Parameters.Add("@User_MobileNo", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value =txtRegMobile.Text; cmd.Parameters.Add("@User_FaxNo", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value =txtRegFax.Text; cmd.Connection = SqlCon; try { Vendor_ID.Direction = System.Data.ParameterDirection.Output; SqlCon.Open(); cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); string VendorID = cmd.ExecuteScalar() as string; } catch (Exception ex) { throw new Exception(ex.Message); } finally { string url = "../CompanyBasicInfo.aspx?Parameter=" + Server.UrlEncode(" + VendorID + "); SqlCon.Close(); } }

    Read the article

  • How can i return dataset perfectly from sql?

    - by Phsika
    i try to write a winform application: i dislike below codes: DataTable dt = new DataTable(); dt.Load(dr); ds = new DataSet(); ds.Tables.Add(dt); Above part of codes looks unsufficient.How can i best loading dataset? public class LoadDataset { public DataSet GetAllData(string sp) { return LoadSQL(sp); } private DataSet LoadSQL(string sp) { SqlConnection con = new SqlConnection(ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings["ConnectionString"].ToString()); SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(sp, con); DataSet ds; try { con.Open(); cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure; SqlDataReader dr = cmd.ExecuteReader(); DataTable dt = new DataTable(); dt.Load(dr); ds = new DataSet(); ds.Tables.Add(dt); return ds; } finally { con.Dispose(); cmd.Dispose(); } } }

    Read the article

  • java.sql.SQLException: Parameter index out of range (3 > number of parameters, which is 2)

    - by sam
    @WebMethod(operationName = "SearchOR") public SearchOR getSearchOR (@WebParam(name = "comp") String comp, @WebParam(name = "name") String name) { //TODO write your implementation code here: SearchOR ack = null; try{ String simpleProc = "{ call getuser_info_or(?,?)}"; CallableStatement cs = con.prepareCall(simpleProc); cs.setString(1, comp); cs.setString(2, name); ResultSet rs = cs.executeQuery(); System.out.print("2"); /* int i = 0, j = 0; if (rs.last()) { i = rs.getRow(); ack = new SearchOR[i]; rs.beforeFirst(); }*/ while (rs.next()) { // ack[j] = new SearchOR(rs.getString(1), rs.getString(2)); // j++; ve.add(rs.getString(1)); ve.add(rs.getString(2)); }}catch ( Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); System.out.print(e); } return ack; } I am getting error at portion i have made bold.It is pointing to that location.My Query is here: DELIMITER $$ DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS discoverdb.getuser_info_or$$ MySQL returned an empty result set (i.e. zero rows). CREATE PROCEDURE discoverdb.getuser_info_or ( IN comp VARCHAR(100), IN name VARCHAR(100), OUT Login VARCHAR(100), OUT email VARCHAR(100) ) BEGIN SELECT sLogin, sEmail INTO Login, email FROM ad_user WHERE company = comp OR sName=name; END $$ MySQL returned an empty result set (i.e. zero rows). DELIMITER ;

    Read the article

  • How do I Put Several Select Statements into Different Columns

    - by Russ Bradberry
    I basically have 7 select statement that I need to have the results output into separate columns. Normally I would use a crosstab for this but I need a fast efficient way to go about this as there are over 7 billion rows in the table. I am using the vertica database system. Below is an example of my statements: SELECT COUNT(user_id) AS '1' FROM event_log_facts WHERE date_dim_id=20100101 SELECT COUNT(user_id) AS '2' FROM event_log_facts WHERE date_dim_id=20100102 SELECT COUNT(user_id) AS '3' FROM event_log_facts WHERE date_dim_id=20100103 SELECT COUNT(user_id) AS '4' FROM event_log_facts WHERE date_dim_id=20100104 SELECT COUNT(user_id) AS '5' FROM event_log_facts WHERE date_dim_id=20100105 SELECT COUNT(user_id) AS '6' FROM event_log_facts WHERE date_dim_id=20100106 SELECT COUNT(user_id) AS '7' FROM event_log_facts WHERE date_dim_id=20100107

    Read the article

  • i need a query to retrieve the following constraint

    - by ANITHA
    I have the following tables and fields: +------------------+ +-------------------+ +---------------+ | Request | | RequestItem | | Item | +------------------+ +-------------------+ +---------------+ | + Requester_Name | | + Request_No | | + Item | +------------------+ +-------------------+ +---------------+ | + Request_No | | + Item | +------------------+ +-------------------+ I would like to filter the items which are selected under a particular request number, along with a specific requester name. How might I go about doing this?

    Read the article

  • How to select all parent objects into DataContext using single LINQ query ?

    - by too
    I am looking for an answer to a specific problem of fetching whole LINQ object hierarchy using single SELECT. At first I was trying to fill as much LINQ objects as possible using LoadOptions, but AFAIK this method allows only single table to be linked in one query using LoadWith. So I have invented a solution to forcibly set all parent objects of entity which of list is to be fetched, although there is a problem of multiple SELECTS going to database - a single query results in two SELECTS with the same parameters in the same LINQ context. For this question I have simplified this query to popular invoice example: public static class Extensions { public static IEnumerable<T> ForEach<T>(this IEnumerable<T> collection, Action<T> func) { foreach(var c in collection) { func(c); } return collection; } } public IEnumerable<Entry> GetResults(AppDataContext context, int CustomerId) { return ( from entry in context.Entries join invoice in context.Invoices on entry.EntryInvoiceId equals invoice.InvoiceId join period in context.Periods on invoice.InvoicePeriodId equals period.PeriodId // LEFT OUTER JOIN, store is not mandatory join store in context.Stores on entry.EntryStoreId equals store.StoreId into condStore from store in condStore.DefaultIfEmpty() where (invoice.InvoiceCustomerId = CustomerId) orderby entry.EntryPrice descending select new { Entry = entry, Invoice = invoice, Period = period, Store = store } ).ForEach(x => { x.Entry.Invoice = Invoice; x.Invoice.Period = Period; x.Entry.Store = Store; } ).Select(x => x.Entry); } When calling this function and traversing through result set, for example: var entries = GetResults(this.Context); int withoutStore = 0; foreach(var k in entries) { if(k.EntryStoreId == null) withoutStore++; } the resulting query to database looks like (single result is fetched): SELECT [t0].[EntryId], [t0].[EntryInvoiceId], [t0].[EntryStoreId], [t0].[EntryProductId], [t0].[EntryQuantity], [t0].[EntryPrice], [t1].[InvoiceId], [t1].[InvoiceCustomerId], [t1].[InvoiceDate], [t1].[InvoicePeriodId], [t2].[PeriodId], [t2].[PeriodName], [t2].[PeriodDateFrom], [t4].[StoreId], [t4].[StoreName] FROM [Entry] AS [t0] INNER JOIN [Invoice] AS [t1] ON [t0].[EntryInvoiceId] = [t1].[InvoiceId] INNER JOIN [Period] AS [t2] ON [t2].[PeriodId] = [t1].[InvoicePeriodId] LEFT OUTER JOIN ( SELECT 1 AS [test], [t3].[StoreId], [t3].[StoreName] FROM [Store] AS [t3] ) AS [t4] ON [t4].[StoreId] = ([t0].[EntryStoreId]) WHERE (([t1].[InvoiceCustomerId]) = @p0) ORDER BY [t0].[InvoicePrice] DESC -- @p0: Input Int (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [186] -- Context: SqlProvider(Sql2008) Model: AttributedMetaModel Build: 3.5.30729.1 SELECT [t0].[EntryId], [t0].[EntryInvoiceId], [t0].[EntryStoreId], [t0].[EntryProductId], [t0].[EntryQuantity], [t0].[EntryPrice], [t1].[InvoiceId], [t1].[InvoiceCustomerId], [t1].[InvoiceDate], [t1].[InvoicePeriodId], [t2].[PeriodId], [t2].[PeriodName], [t2].[PeriodDateFrom], [t4].[StoreId], [t4].[StoreName] FROM [Entry] AS [t0] INNER JOIN [Invoice] AS [t1] ON [t0].[EntryInvoiceId] = [t1].[InvoiceId] INNER JOIN [Period] AS [t2] ON [t2].[PeriodId] = [t1].[InvoicePeriodId] LEFT OUTER JOIN ( SELECT 1 AS [test], [t3].[StoreId], [t3].[StoreName] FROM [Store] AS [t3] ) AS [t4] ON [t4].[StoreId] = ([t0].[EntryStoreId]) WHERE (([t1].[InvoiceCustomerId]) = @p0) ORDER BY [t0].[InvoicePrice] DESC -- @p0: Input Int (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [186] -- Context: SqlProvider(Sql2008) Model: AttributedMetaModel Build: 3.5.30729.1 The question is why there are two queries and how can I fetch LINQ objects without such hacks?

    Read the article

  • How to map to tables in database PHPMyAdmin

    - by thegrede
    I'm working now on a project which a user can save their own coupon codes on the websites, so I want to know what is the best to do that, Lets say, I have 1 table with the users, like this, userId | firstName | lastName | codeId and then I have a table of the coupon codes, like this, codeId | codeNumber So what I can do is to connect the codeId to userId so when someone saves the coupons goes the codeId from the coupon table into the codeId of the users table, But now what if when a user have multiple coupons what do I do it should be connected to the user? I have 2 options what to do, Option 1, Saving the codeId from coupons table into the codeId of users table like 1,2,3,4,5, Option 2 To make a new row into the coupons table and to connect the user to the code with adding another field in the coupon table userId and putting into it the user which has added the coupon his userId of the users table, So what of the two options is better to do? Thanks you guys.

    Read the article

  • Fact table with multiple facts

    - by Jeff Meatball Yang
    I have a dimension (SiteItem) has two important facts: perUserClicks perBrowserClicks however, within this dimension, I have groups of dimensions based on an attribute column (let's call the groups AboveFoldItems, LeftNavItems, OnTheFlyItems, etc.) each have more facts that are specific to that group: AboveFoldItems: eyeTime, loadTime LeftNavItems: mouseOverTime OnTheFlyItems: doesn't have any extra, but may in the future Is the following fact table schema ok? DateKey SessionKey SiteItemKey perUserClicks perBrowserClicks eyeTime loadTime mouseOverTime It seems a little wasteful since only some columns pertain to some dimension keys (the irrelevant facts are left NULL). But... this seems like it would be a common problem, so there should be a common solution for this, right?

    Read the article

  • GridView will not update underlying data source

    - by John Christensen
    So I'm been pounding on this problem all day. I've got a LinqDataSource that points to my model and a GridView that consumes it. When I attempt to do an update on the GridView, it does not update the underlying data source. I thought it might have to do with the LinqDataSource, so I added a SqlDataSource and the same thing happens. The aspx is as follows (the code-behind page is empty): <asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource1" runat="server" ConnectionString="Data Source=devsql32;Initial Catalog=Steam;Persist Security Info=True;" ProviderName="System.Data.SqlClient" SelectCommand="SELECT [LangID], [Code], [Name] FROM [Languages]" UpdateCommand="UPDATE [Languages] SET [Code]=@Code WHERE [LangID]=@LangId"> </asp:SqlDataSource> <asp:GridView ID="_languageGridView" runat="server" AllowPaging="True" AllowSorting="True" AutoGenerateColumns="False" DataKeyNames="LangId" DataSourceID="SqlDataSource1"> <Columns> <asp:CommandField ShowDeleteButton="True" ShowEditButton="True" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="LangId" HeaderText="Id" ReadOnly="True" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="Code" HeaderText="Code" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="Name" HeaderText="Name" /> </Columns> </asp:GridView> <asp:LinqDataSource ID="_languageDataSource" ContextTypeName="GeneseeSurvey.SteamDatabaseDataContext" runat="server" TableName="Languages" EnableInsert="True" EnableUpdate="true" EnableDelete="true"> </asp:LinqDataSource> What in the world am I missing here? This problem is driving me insane.

    Read the article

  • Conditionally Summing the same Column multiple times in a single select statement?

    - by btollett
    I have a single table that shows employee deployments, for various types of deployment, in a given location for each month: ID | Location_ID | Date | NumEmployees | DeploymentType_ID As an example, a few records might be: 1 | L1 | 12/2010 | 7 | 1 (=Permanent) 2 | L1 | 12/2010 | 2 | 2 (=Temp) 3 | L1 | 12/2010 | 1 | 3 (=Support) 4 | L1 | 01/2011 | 4 | 1 5 | L1 | 01/2011 | 2 | 2 6 | L1 | 01/2011 | 1 | 3 7 | L2 | 12/2010 | 6 | 1 8 | L2 | 01/2011 | 6 | 1 9 | L2 | 12/2010 | 3 | 2 What I need to do is sum the various types of people by date, such that the results look something like this: Date | Total Perm | Total Temp | Total Supp 12/2010 | 13 | 5 | 1 01/2011 | 10 | 2 | 1 Currently, I've created a separate query for each deployment type that looks like this: SELECT Date, SUM(NumEmployees) AS "Total Permanent" FROM tblDeployment WHERE DeploymentType_ID=1 GROUP BY Date; We'll call that query qSumPermDeployments. Then, I'm using a couple of joins to combine the queries: SELECT qSumPermDeployments.Date, qSumPermDeployments.["Total Permanent"] AS "Permanent" qSumTempDeployments.["Total Temp"] AS "Temp" qSumSupportDeployments.["Total Support"] AS Support FROM (qSumPermDeployments LEFT JOIN qSumTempDeployments ON qSumPermDeployments.Date = qSumTempDeployments.Date) LEFT JOIN qSumSupportDeployments ON qSumPermDeployments.Date = qSumSupportDeployments.Date; Note that I'm currently constructing that final query under the assumption that a location will only have temp or support employees if they also have permanent employees. Thus, I can create the joins using the permanent employee results as the base table. Given all of the data I currently have, that assumption holds up, but ideally I'd like to move away from that assumption. So finally, my question. Is there a way to simplify this down to a single query or is it best to separate it out into multiple queries - if for no other reason that readability.

    Read the article

  • Is SELECT INTO able to affect data from its original table during UPDATE

    - by driveby
    Whilst asking this question asp.net scheduling timed events user murph posted some insightful information: Point about this is that its very, very simple - you have an process for exchange that is performing a clearly defined task and you have a high frequency task that is not doing anything particularly complex, its a straightforward query (select from table where sent = false and send at < value) - probably into temporary table so that you can run a single query update after you've done the sends - that you can optimise the index for. You're not trying to queue up a huge pile of event triggers, just one that fires once a minute and processes things that are due. Is it possible to SELECT data from table X INTO table Y and have the UPDATES that are performed on table Y pushed into table X? I guess the alternative would be that the data gets updated in table Y then an update command can be run on table X based on the data in table Y. What would be the advantage of selecting into another table? Thank you,

    Read the article

  • How can I get the rank of rows relative to total number of rows based on a field?

    - by Arms
    I have a scores table that has two fields: user_id score I'm fetching specific rows that match a list of user_id's. How can I determine a rank for each row relative to the total number of rows, based on score? The rows in the result set are not necessarily sequential (the scores will vary widely from one row to the next). I'm not sure if this matters, but user_id is a unique field. Edit @Greelmo I'm already ordering the rows. If I fetch 15 rows, I don't want the rank to be 1-15. I need it to be the position of that row compared against the entire table by the score property. So if I have 200 rows, one row's rank may be 3 and another may be 179 (these are arbitrary #'s for example only). Edit 2 I'm having some luck with this query, but I actually want to avoid ties SELECT s.score , s.created_at , u.name , u.location , u.icon_id , u.photo , (SELECT COUNT(*) + 1 FROM scores WHERE score > s.score) AS rank FROM scores s LEFT JOIN users u ON u.uID = s.user_id ORDER BY s.score DESC , s.created_at DESC LIMIT 15 If two or more rows have the same score, I want the latest one (or earliest - I don't care) to be ranked higher. I tried modifying the subquery with AND id > s.id but that ended up giving me an unexpected result set and different ties.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624  | Next Page >