Search Results

Search found 23708 results on 949 pages for 'javascript'.

Page 63/949 | < Previous Page | 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70  | Next Page >

  • Preview an html page without opening it

    - by Hulk
    On click a image how can another page be previewed in the same page without opening the actual page.And lets say the url /home/home.php?id=3 The preview should be in the preview div <img src="/home/app/img/toggle.gif" onlclick="show();" /> <div id="preview"></div> Thanks..

    Read the article

  • Problem with onMouseOut event with select box options (IE)

    - by nik
    Hello All, The problem I am facing with below code is that whenever I try to select any option from the select box, the mouseout event executed (in IE, Mozilla doing gr8) and option disappear. How can one get over this bug. <select name="ed" id="ed" dir="ltr" style="width:200px;overflow:hidden;" onMouseOver="this.style.width='auto'" onMouseOut="this.style.width='200px';"> <option value="1" selected="selected">click here</option> <option value="1">Samuel Jackson</option> <option value="2">David Nalog</option> <option value="3">This one is a real real big name</option> </select>

    Read the article

  • Disable link with the prototype observe method...

    - by enyo
    I want to create a link like this: <a href="http://example.com">text</a> and replace the behavior so that the link downloads the content with Ajax instead when clicking. It is important for me not to replace the href attribute (so copying the link still works). One solution would be to do: $('link').onclick = function() { return false; }; but I would like to use the .observe method. But this doesn't work: $('link').observe('click', function() { return false; }); (which is quite logical). Any ideas on how I could achieve this? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Catch all DOM events on a page (without Firebug et. al.)

    - by Morten Bergfall
    How would I go about creating a cross-browser script, that would intercept all events firing on a page/browser window/DOM-tree (regardless of browser)? What I'm hoping to accomplish is basically to get a better understanding of the different handling of events in different browsers; I know the basic theory, but need to see to believe...

    Read the article

  • How can i put my form value in javascript array

    - by Lucas van den Abbeele
    I want to make a script where i can put my form in the javascript array invoer[] and display the total It constantly stops working and i searched a lot, i really can't find the right way :D This is my javascript code var strijk = ['broek', 'hemd', 'tshirt', 'lakens', 'korte broek', 'babykledij']; var minuten = [5, 10, 5, 6, 3, 3]; function invoerstrijk() { document.write("<form action='' method='get' name='strijkform'>"); for (var a = 0; a < minuten.length; a++) { document.write(strijk[a] + "<input id='" + strijk[a] + "' name ='" + strijk[a] + "' type='text' />" + "<BR>"); } document.write("<button onclick='opgeven()'>opgeven</button>"); document.write("</form>"); } function opgeven() { var invoer = []; for (var a = 0; a < minuten.length; a++) { invoer[a] = document.getElementByI(strijk[a]).value; } var totaal; for (var a = 0; a < minuten.length; a++) { totaal += parseint(invoer[a]) * parseint(minuten[a]); } document.write("<input name=" + strijk[a] + " type='text' value=" + invoer[a] + " readonly />"); if (invoer != []) { document.write("totaal aantal minuten" + totaal); } else { document.write("geen invoer"); } } my html looks likes this <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <title>Untitled Document</title> </head> <body> <script type="text/javascript" > //my javasccript </script> <button id="B1" onclick="invoerstrijk()" >Nieuwe strijk</button> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • Play Framework: Generate PDF from template that uses Javascript for graphing

    - by digiarnie
    I have a template that has some Javascript used to generate graphs in the browser. I would like to use that same template to create a PDF and send as an attachment in an e-mail. In this scenario, there would be no browser/client interaction. I am using the PDF module that is available from the Play website and I have managed to get the PDF rendering to work. The only issue is that the graphs don't show up in the PDF but all other static text does. I'm assuming the graphs aren't appearing in the PDF due to the Javascript not being executed prior to the PDF generation. Does anyone have any ideas on how to get around this problem?

    Read the article

  • Enable/disable zoom on iPhone safari with Javascript?

    - by msqr
    I have 1 page which has 2 DIV elements which is shown/hidden based on user click on action buttons with javascript, I would like to toggle scaling on action button click. I tried with below javascript and it is changing viewport meta but getting no effect. Any suggestions? Blockquote var ViewPortAllowZoom = 'width=device-width;'; var ViewPortNoZoom = 'width=device-width; initial-scale=1.0; maximum-scale=1.0; minimum-scale=1.0; user-scalable=no;'; function AllowZoom(flag) { if (flag == true) { $('meta[name*=viewport]').attr('content', ViewPortAllowZoom); } else { $('meta[name*=viewport]').attr('content', ViewPortNoZoom); } }

    Read the article

  • Dynamically loading JavaScript synchronously

    - by spoon16
    I'm using the module pattern, one of the things I want to do is dynamically include an external JavaScript file, execute the file, and then use the functions/variables in the file in the return { } of my module. I can't figure out how to do this easily. Are there any standard ways of performing a pseudo synchronous external script load? function myModule() { var tag = document.createElement("script"); tag.type = "text/javascript"; tag.src = "http://some/script.js"; document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(tag); //something should go here to ensure file is loaded before return is executed return { external: externalVariable } }

    Read the article

  • javascript date.utc problem

    - by Dave
    I'm trying to compare 2 dates using javascript. 1 at the end of the month and 1 at the beginning. I need to compare these 2 dates in seconds so I'm using the Date.UTC javascript function. Here's the code: var d = Date.UTC(2010,5,31,23,59,59); document.write(d); var d2 = Date.UTC(2010,6,1,12,20,11); document.write(d2); The output for is: 1278028799000 1277986811000 This is telling me that 1/6/2010 is less than 5/31/2010 in milliseconds. How is that possible? What am I doing wrong? Thanks for your help.

    Read the article

  • how can I declare a value deep in an object tree using variable properties in javascript

    - by joshs
    I am trying to have a javascript object tree behave like a php associative array in the following way. var key1 = 'a'; var key2 = 'b'; var key3 = 'c'; var obj[key1][key2][key3] = 'd'; However, in javascript I believe you need to define each property/object pair individually, forming deeper leaves. Something like: var obj[key1] = {}; var obj[key1][key2] = {}; ... Is there a way to simplify or shorten this script? Thanks

    Read the article

  • JavaScript based diff utility

    - by poke
    I'm looking for a diff equivalent written in JavaScript that only returns/prints relevant lines. I don't want both full text displayed next to each other with the differences highlighted, but just want the actual differences (plus some buffer lines to know where the difference is), similar to the output from the linux diff utility. Does anybody know a javascript function that does this? All differences should be recognized (even changed whitespace). Thanks. edit I have seen jsdifflib but in the example it always shows the full source, so unless there is a way to change the output somehow, it doesn't fully meet my requirements.

    Read the article

  • Usercontrol access javascript from a Content's Page's Master Page

    - by Coda
    Hello all I have a problem. I have a masterpage that all of my Content pages inherit from. Within this masterpage I have a script tag pointing to the javascript file folder "~/Scripts/validation.js" On my content pages I use different usercontrols that require the use of many of the functions within the validation.js file however if I dont put the tag and the javascript functions within a contentholder on the contentpage the usercontrols do not see these functions and I get errors like "OnNameValidation" is not defined. Of course I can copy the javscript code into all of the pages but that's 30+ pages and a maintenance nightmare if I find a bug in one of the javscript functions. So the question (if you haven't already figured out from my long dissertation) is how can I declare the script tag with the path to the validation.js file so that contentpages and their usercontrols etc. can access the functions/code. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Simple Hide/Expand with Javascript

    - by user478419
    I have created a simple expand/hide test script: <html> <head> <script type="type/javascript"><!-- function showHide(elementid){ if (document.getElementById(elementid).style.display == 'none'){ document.getElementById(elementid).style.display = ''; } else { document.getElementById(elementid).style.display = 'none'; } } //--> </script> </head> <body> <div><a href="javascript:showHide('div_1035677');">more...</a></div> <div id="div_1035677" style="display:none"> HIDDEN CONTENT </div> </body> </html> I get an error message that I can't make any sense of (Object expected on line one). I don't see any errors in the above code. :-(

    Read the article

  • jquery for ruby on rails

    - by Cezar
    Hello, I am tying to use this code http://gist.github.com/110410 to dump Prototype in favor of jQuery but I do have a problem. This is my HTML (a link_to generated link): <a onclick="var f = document.createElement('form'); f.style.display = 'none'; this.parentNode.appendChild(f); f.method = 'POST'; f.action = this.href;var s = document.createElement('input'); s.setAttribute('type', 'hidden'); s.setAttribute('name', 'authenticity_token'); s.setAttribute('value', 'Mi6RcR6YDyvg2uNwGrpbeIJutSHa2fYboU37wSDE7AU='); f.appendChild(s);f.submit();return false;" class="post add_to_cart " href="/line_items?product_id=547">Add to cart</a> Issue: Everything works as it should except that the page does a reload. I suspect that the submit gets thru which causes a page reload. Is there an elegant way to prevent that ? return false; doesn't seem to cut it in this case.

    Read the article

  • Using Selenium-IDE with a rich Javascript application?

    - by Darien
    Problem At my workplace, we're trying to find the best way to create automated-tests for an almost wholly javascript-driven intranet application. Right now we're stuck trying to find a good tradeoff between: Application code in reusable and nest-able GUI components. Tests which are easily created by the testing team Tests which can be recorded once and then automated Tests which do not break after small cosmetic changes to the site XPath expressions (or other possible expressions, like jQuery selectors) naively generated from Selenium-IDE are often non-repeatable and very fragile. Conversely, having the JS code generate special unique ID values for every important DOM-element on the page... well, that is its own headache, complicated by re-usable GUI components and IDs needing to be consistent when the test is re-run. What successes have other people had with this kind of thing? How do you do automated application-level testing of a rich JS interface? Limitations We are using JavascriptMVC 2.0, hopefully 3.0 soon so that we can upgrade to jQuery 1.4.x. The test-making folks are mostly trained to use Selenium IDE to directly record things. The test leads would prefer a page-unique HTML ID on each clickable element on the page... Training the testers to write or alter special expressions (such as telling them which HTML class-names are important branching points) is a no-go. We try to make re-usable javascript components, but this means very few GUI components can treat themselves (or what they contain) as unique. Some of our components already use HTML ID values in their operation. I'd like to avoid doing this anyway, but it complicates the idea of ID-based testing. It may be possible to add custom facilities (like a locator-builder or new locator method) to the Selenium-IDE installation testers use. Almost everything that goes on occurs within a single "page load" from a conventional browser perspective, even when items are saved Current thoughts I'm considering a system where a custom locator-builder (javascript code) for Selenium-IDE will talk with our application code as the tester is recording. In this way, our application becomes partially responsible for generating a mostly-flexible expression (XPath or jQuery) for any given DOM element. While this can avoid requiring more training for testers, I worry it may be over-thinking things.

    Read the article

  • how to add markup to text using JavaScript regex

    - by Richard
    I need to add markup to some text using JavaScript regular expressions. In Python I could do this with: >>> import re >>> re.sub('(banana|apple)', r'<b>{\1}</b>', 'I have 1 banana and 2 apples!') 'I have 1 <b>{banana}</b> and 2 <b>{apple}</b>s!' What is the equivalent in JavaScript? string.replace(regex, newstring) seems to only take a raw string for replacing.

    Read the article

  • View code inside Javascript file on Rails

    - by SpyrosP
    Hello, previously i had javascript code right in the top of my view and it would work. Then, i learned that you can include the js file using yield and i did just that. I had rails view code inside my javascript code like : $( "#exp-progressbar" ).progressbar({ value: <%= ((@quest.end_time - Time.now).to_i * 100 ) / (@quest.duration * 60) %> }); Now, after i do it with yield, i get an error when i do that in the separate js file. How can i do it now ?

    Read the article

  • Progressbar: Force element.innerHTML update before javascript sort call

    - by maras
    Hi, what is the best practice for this scenario: 1) User clicks "Sort huge javascript array" 2) Browser shows "Sorting..." through element.innerHTML="Sorting" 3) Browser sorts huge javascript array (100% CPU for several seconds) while displaying "Sorting..." message. 4) Browser shows result. Pseudo code: ... <a href="#" onclick="sortHugeArray();return false">Sort huge array</a> ... function sortHugeArray(){ document.getElementById("progress").innerHTML="Sorting..."; ...do huge sort ... ...render result... document.getElementById("progress").innerHTML=result; } When i do that this way, browser never shows "Sorting...", it freezes browser for several seconds and shows result without noticing user... Thank you for advice.

    Read the article

  • JQuery: how to use "delegate" instead of "live"?

    - by JacobD
    I've read countless articles how using the JQuery delegate is much more efficient than using the "live" event. As such, I'm having trouble converting my existing Live code to using Delegate. $("#tabs li:eq(0)").live('click',function(){ //...code }); $('#A > div.listing, #B > div.listing, #C > div.listing').live('mouseover',function(){ // ...code }); When I replace the previous code with what I assume is more efficient delegate code, my page doesn't load. $("#tabs li:eq(0)").delegate('click',function(){ //...code }); $('#A > div.listing, #B > div.listing, #C > div.listing').delegate('mouseover',function(){ // ...code }); Any idea why my delegate code doesn't work? Also, any suggestions on how to make this more efficient? UPDATE: The think part of the problem is that, both "#tabs" and "#A, #B, #C" are't present on the web page at page load. Those attributes are dynamically inserted onto the page with an AJAX call. As such, does that mean I have to use live over delegate?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70  | Next Page >