Search Results

Search found 15115 results on 605 pages for 'state pattern'.

Page 64/605 | < Previous Page | 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71  | Next Page >

  • Working with arrays of lists pattern in java

    - by Mad Wombat
    I am writing a card game in java where I need to spread cards from a deck into several columns until I have fixed amount of cards left. This is how I do this. public class Column extends ArrayList {} List deck = Cards.createNewDeck(); Column[] columns = new Column[10]; int c = 0; while (deck.size() 50) { if (c == 10) { c = 0; } if (columns[c] == null) { columns[c] = new Column(); } columns[c].add(Cards.dealTopCard(deck)); c += 1; } This somehow seems clunky. Is there a more readable/comprehensive way of doing the same thing?

    Read the article

  • JavaScript Resource Management Design Pattern

    - by Adam
    As a web developer, a common problem I find myself tackling is waiting for something to load before doing something else. In particular, I often hide (using either display: none; or visibility: hidden; depending on the situation) elements while waiting for a background image or a CSS file to load. Consider this example from Last.FM. They overlay a semi-transparant PNG over each album art image so that it looks like it's inside a jewel-case. They let it load when it loads, so depending on your internet speed, you may see the art image by itself (without the overlay) temporarily. In this case, the album art looks fine without the jewel-case effect. But in similar situations, I have found that I don't want the user to see the site's design mangled as resources incrementally load. So, in rare cases I have hidden everything from the user until the whole kit and kaboodle has loaded. But this is often a pain to write out, and may force the user to wait for a pretty long time to see anything (besides "loading..." text). I can think of (and have used on occasion) some obvious solutions/compromises: Use some inline CSS so that as certain parts of the DOM load and render, they will immediately have the correct size/position/etc. Immediately render the navigation part of the site, so that if the user wanted to use the current page purely to get somewhere else, they don't have to wait for the rest to load. Load pixelated images first as placeholders for layout while lazy-loading higher quality images as replacements. Something quirky like using a cute animated gif to distract the user during a "loading..." phase. Show useful information as a reference while loading the full UI. (Something akin to Gmail Inbox Preview, etc.) (Sorry if my question was basically just asked and answered...) Despite all of these ideas, I still find myself hoping there are better ways of doing some of these things. So I guess what I'm looking for is some inspiration and/or any creative ways of dealing with this problem that you guys may have seen out in the wild.

    Read the article

  • Manipulating collections & the ViewModel pattern

    - by Kragen
    I'm relatively new to WPF, and I'm having trouble with what I'm fairly certain is a relatively simple problem. I have my underlying data object, a Person: class Person { public string Surname {get; set; } public string Firstname {get; set; } public List<Address> Addresses {get; } } And I wish to display and edit this object in my WPF app. To this end I've created a ViewModel that I bind to in my xaml: class PersonViewModel { public string Fullname {get; } public ObservableCollection<AddressViewModel> Addresses {get; } } This is fine, except when it comes to manipulating my Address collection, where I can't work out what I should be doing: Should I add methods AddAddress, RemoveAddress etc... to my PersonViewModel class for manipulating my collection with instances of AddressViewModel Should I just add instances of AddressViewModel to my Addresses observable collection Both of the above seem a bit messy - is there a better way of dealing with collections?

    Read the article

  • Grails pattern to reuse template on error

    - by bsreekanth
    Hello, I have a gsp template, where the data for create view is passed through the controller. def create = { def bookInstance = new Book() bookInstance .properties = params def map = getDefaultValues() render(template: "create", model: [bookInstance : bookInstance , title: map.title, somelist: somelist ....]) the gsp template <g:select optionKey="id" from="${somelist}" name="somelist.id" value="${bookInstance ?.somelist?.id}" noSelection="['null': '']"></g:select> now, in the save method, if there is an error, it returns currently populated and validated instance (default scaffold implementation) render(template: "create", model: [bookInstance : bookInstance ]) But the fields in the gsp (error page rendered from save action) is empty. I could see the reason as it looks the value in "${somelist}" , but it is not used in save method. Do i just need to check for null in the gsp and use whichever map is available, or any better method (passing all the map in the save method is not an option) .. thanks in advance..

    Read the article

  • Learning MVC - Maintaining model state

    - by GenericTypeTea
    First of all, I'm very new to MVC. Bought the books, but not got the T-Shirt yet. I've put together my first little application, but I'm looking at the way I'm maintaining my model and I don't think it looks right. My form contains the following: <% using (Html.BeginForm("Reconfigured", null, FormMethod.Post, new { id = "configurationForm" })) { %> <%= Html.DropDownList("selectedCompany", new SelectList(Model.Companies, Model.SelectedCompany), new { onchange = "$('#configurationForm').submit()" })%> <%= Html.DropDownList("selectedDepartment", new SelectList(Model.Departments, Model.SelectedDepartment), new { onchange = "$('#configurationForm').submit()" })%> <%=Html.TextArea("comment", Model.Comment) %> <%} %> My controller has the following: public ActionResult Index(string company, string department, string comment) { TestModel form = new TestModel(); form.Departments = _someRepository.GetList(); form.Companies = _someRepository.GetList(); form.Comment = comment; form.SelectedCompany = company; form.SelectedDepartment = department; return View(form); } [HttpPost] public ActionResult Reconfigured(string selectedCompany, string selectedDepartment, string comment) { return RedirectToAction("Index", new { company = selectedCompany, department = selectedDepartment, comment = comment}); } And finally, this is my route: routes.MapRoute( "Default", "{controller}/{company}/{department}", new { controller = "CompanyController", action = "Index", company="", department="" } ); Now, every time I change DropDownList value, all my values are maintained. I end up with a URL like the following after the Reconfigure action is called: http://localhost/Main/Index/Company/Sales?comment=Foo%20Bar Ideally I'd like the URL to remain as: http://localhost/Main/Index My routing object is probably wrong. This can't be the right way? It seems totally wrong to me as for each extra field I add, I have to add the property into the Index() method? I had a look at this answer where the form is passed through TempData. This is obviously an improvement, but it's not strongly typed? Is there a way to do something similar but have it strongly typed? This may be a simple-enough question, but the curse of 10 years of WinForms/WebForms makes this MVC malarky hard to get your head 'round.

    Read the article

  • Pattern for managing reference count and object life

    - by Gopalakrishnan Subramani
    We have a serial port which is connected to hundreds of physical devices on the same wire. We have protocols like Modbus and Hart to handle the request and response between the application and devices. The question is related to managing the reference count of the channel. When no device is using the channel, the channel should be closed. public class SerialPortChannel { int refCount = 0; public void AddReference() { refCount++; } public void ReleaseReference() { refCount--; if (refCount <= 0) this.ReleasePort(); //This close the serial port } } For each device connected, we create a object for the device like device = new Device(); device.Attach(channel); //this calls channel.AddReference() When the device disconnect, device.Detach(channel); //this calls channel.ReleaseReference() I am not convinced by the reference count model. Are there any better way to handle this problem in .NET World?

    Read the article

  • what pattern to use for multi-argument method?

    - by Omid S
    I have a method with the following signature: foo (Sample sample, Aliquot aliquot) "foo" needs to alter a Sample object, either the first argument or from the second argument it can extract its Sample. For example: foo (Sample sample, Aliquot aliquot) { Sample out = null; if (sample != null) out = sample else out = aliquot.getSample() return out; } But that is so un-elegant, other than reading the API a developer does not know the reference of the first argument overrides the Sample of the second argument. Now, I could change "foo" to foo (SomeMagicalObject bar) where SomeMagicalObject is a tuple for Sample and Aliquot and holds some logic ... etc. But I am wondering, are there some patterns for this question?

    Read the article

  • State machines in C#

    - by Sir Psycho
    Hi, I'm trying to work out what's going on with this code. I have two threads iterating over the range and I'm trying to understand what is happening when the second thread calls GetEnumerator(). This line in particular (T current = start;), seems to spawn a new 'instance' in this method by the second thread. Seeing that there is only one instance of the DateRange class, I'm trying to understand why this works. Thanks in advance. class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { var daterange = new DateRange(DateTime.Now, DateTime.Now.AddDays(10), new TimeSpan(24, 0, 0)); var ts1 = new ThreadStart(delegate { foreach (var date in daterange) { Console.WriteLine("Thread " + Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId + " " + date); } }); var ts2 = new ThreadStart(delegate { foreach (var date in daterange) { Console.WriteLine("Thread " + Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId + " " + date); } }); Thread t1 = new Thread(ts1); Thread t2 = new Thread(ts2); t1.Start(); Thread.Sleep(4000); t2.Start(); Console.Read(); } } public class DateRange : Range<DateTime> { public DateTime Start { get; private set; } public DateTime End { get; private set; } public TimeSpan SkipValue { get; private set; } public DateRange(DateTime start, DateTime end, TimeSpan skip) : base(start, end) { SkipValue = skip; } public override DateTime GetNextElement(DateTime current) { return current.Add(SkipValue); } } public abstract class Range<T> : IEnumerable<T> where T : IComparable<T> { readonly T start; readonly T end; public Range(T start, T end) { if (start.CompareTo(end) > 0) throw new ArgumentException("Start value greater than end value"); this.start = start; this.end = end; } public abstract T GetNextElement(T currentElement); public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator() { T current = start; do { Thread.Sleep(1000); yield return current; current = GetNextElement(current); } while (current.CompareTo(end) < 1); } System.Collections.IEnumerator System.Collections.IEnumerable.GetEnumerator() { return GetEnumerator(); } }

    Read the article

  • How to maintain the state of button cutom listview in android

    - by Akshay
    I have custom ListView with three TextView three Button and three Chronometer. And the situation is I am loading the ListView properly.But while loading ListView I am disabling some button in the ListView by checking one parameter. Up to this point ListView is showing it's row properly. But when I am scrolling the ListView at that time previously enabled Button are getting disabled.What I am doing wrong I am not getting can one please point out my mistake Or any suggestion. Here is my Adapter class. public class OrderSmartKitchenAdapter extends BaseAdapter { private int flagDeliveryComplete = 0; private int flagPreparationComplete = 0; private int flagPreparationStarted = 0; private List<OrderitemdetailsBO> list = new ArrayList<OrderitemdetailsBO(); private int orderStatus; public OrderSmartKitchenAdapter() { // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub } public void setOrderList(List<OrderitemdetailsBO> orderList) { this.list = orderList; } @Override public int getCount() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub Log.i("OrderItemList Size :-", Integer.toString(list.size())); return list.size(); } @Override public Object getItem(int position) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub return null; } @Override public long getItemId(int position) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub return 0; } @Override public View getView(final int position, View convertView,ViewGroup parent) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub final ViewHolder viewHolder ; if (convertView == null) { layoutInflater = LayoutInflater.from(myContext); convertView = layoutInflater.inflate(R.layout.table_row_view,null); viewHolder = new ViewHolder(); viewHolder.txtTableNumber = (TextView) convertView.findViewById(R.id.txtTableNumber); viewHolder.txtMenuItem = (TextView) convertView.findViewById(R.id.txtMenuItem); viewHolder.txtQuantity = (TextView) convertView.findViewById(R.id.txtQuantity); viewHolder.txtOrderAcceptanceTime = (TextView) convertView.findViewById(R.id.txtOrderAcceptanceTime); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance = (Chronometer) convertView.findViewById(R.id.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance); viewHolder.btnPreparationStart = (Button) convertView.findViewById(R.id.btnPreparationStart); viewHolder.btnPreparationStart.setTag(position); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation = (Chronometer) convertView.findViewById(R.id.txtElapsedTimeForPrepatration); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete = (Button) convertView.findViewById(R.id.btnPreparationCompleted); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.setTag(position); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete = (Chronometer) convertView.findViewById(R.id.txtElapsedTimeForCompleation); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete = (Button) convertView.findViewById(R.id.btnOrderComplete); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.setTag(position); convertView.setTag(viewHolder); } else{ viewHolder = (ViewHolder)convertView.getTag(); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.setTag(position); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.setTag(position); viewHolder.btnPreparationStart.setTag(position); } if (list.get(position) != null) { OrderitemdetailsBO orderitemdetailsBO = new OrderitemdetailsBO(); orderitemdetailsBO = list.get(position); viewHolder.txtTableNumber.setText(orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderitemid().toString()); viewHolder.txtMenuItem.setText(orderitemdetailsBO.getMenuitemname().toString()); viewHolder.txtQuantity.setText(orderitemdetailsBO.getQuantity().toString()); Log.i("Table Number :-", Long.toString(orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderitemid())); Log.i("Menu Name :-", orderitemdetailsBO.getMenuitemname().toString()); Log.i("Quantity", orderitemdetailsBO.getQuantity().toString()); Date acceptTime = new Date(); acceptTime = orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderdatetime(); viewHolder.txtOrderAcceptanceTime.setText(DateUtil.getDateAsString(acceptTime,"HH:mm")); Log.i("Order Accept Time :-", acceptTime.getMinutes() + ":"+ acceptTime.getSeconds()); orderStatus = orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderstatus(); Date preparationStartTime = new Date(); preparationStartTime = orderitemdetailsBO.getPreparationstarttime(); if(preparationStartTime != null) { Log.i("OrderSmartKitchenActivity", "2 Order Acceptance Time :-" + "Menu Item id "+ orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderitemid() + " Preparation Start time " + orderitemdetailsBO.getPreparationstarttime() ); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.stop(); Log.i("Preparation Start Time :-",preparationStartTime.getMinutes() + ":" + preparationStartTime.getSeconds()); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.setText(DateUtil.getDateAsString(preparationStartTime,"MM:ss")); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.stop(); viewHolder.btnPreparationStart.setEnabled(false); viewHolder.btnPreparationStart.setClickable(false); viewHolder.btnPreparationStart.setBackgroundColor(Color.LTGRAY); } else { Long n = acceptTime.getTime(); Log.i("OrderSmartKitchenActivity", "Order Acceptance Time :-" + "Menu Item id "+ orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderitemid() + " Acceptance time" + Long.toString(n) + " Preparation Start time " + orderitemdetailsBO.getPreparationstarttime() ); // Calculate Time difference viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.setBase(SystemClock.elapsedRealtime() - System.currentTimeMillis() + n); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.getBase(); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.start(); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.setFormat("%s"); } viewHolder.btnPreparationStart.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(final View v) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub if (flagPreparationStarted == 0) { flagPreparationStarted++; v.startAnimation(playAnimation()); handler.postDelayed(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub v.clearAnimation(); Date currentTime = new Date(); // Set Preparation Start Time. viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.stop(); Date setTime = new Date(currentTime.getTime() * 1000); OrderitemdetailsBO orderitemdetailsBO = list.get(position); orderitemdetailsBO.setPreparationstarttime(setTime); String orderDetails = "2"; String getPosition = Integer.toString(position); viewHolder.btnPreparationStart.setBackgroundColor(Color.LTGRAY); new sendOrderStatusToServer().execute(orderDetails,getPosition); } }, 5000); } else { handler.removeCallbacksAndMessages(null); v.clearAnimation(); flagPreparationStarted = 0; Log.i("Handler Removed. :-", "Here"); } } }); String preparationTime = orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderpreparationtime(); if(preparationTime != null && orderStatus == order_preparationComplete) { viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.setText(preparationTime); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.stop(); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.getTag(position); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.setEnabled(false); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.setClickable(false); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.setBackgroundColor(Color.LTGRAY); } else if( orderStatus == order_preparationStart || orderStatus == orderReceived || orderStatus == order_delivered){ Long n = acceptTime.getTime(); Log.i("Preparation Start Time :-", Long.toString(n)); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.setBase(SystemClock.elapsedRealtime() - System.currentTimeMillis() + n); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.getBase(); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.start(); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.setFormat("%s"); } viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(final View v) { // TODO Auto-generated method if (flagPreparationComplete == 0) { flagPreparationComplete++; v.startAnimation(playAnimation()); handler.postDelayed(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub v.clearAnimation(); OrderitemdetailsBO orderitemdetailsBO = list.get(position); Date date = orderitemdetailsBO.getPreparationstarttime(); if(date != null) { viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.stop(); Date currentTime = new Date(); Calendar calendar = Calendar.getInstance(); int minute = calendar.get(Calendar.MINUTE); int second = calendar.get(Calendar.SECOND); orderitemdetailsBO.setOrderpreparationtime(calendar.get(Calendar.MINUTE) +":" +calendar.get(Calendar.SECOND)); String orderDetails = "3"; String getPosition = Integer.toString(position); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.setBackgroundColor(Color.LTGRAY); new sendOrderStatusToServer().execute(orderDetails,getPosition); } else { Toast.makeText(myContext, "Please Enter Preparation Start Time.", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show(); } } }, 5000); } else { handler.removeCallbacksAndMessages(null); v.clearAnimation(); flagPreparationComplete = 0; } } }); String deleveredTime = orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderdeliverytime(); if(deleveredTime != null && orderStatus == order_delivered) { Date delevered = new Date(Long.parseLong(deleveredTime)); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.setText(DateUtil.getDateAsString(delevered,"MM:ss")); Log.i("Preparation Start Time :-", delevered.getMinutes()+":"+delevered.getSeconds()); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.stop(); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.getTag(position); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.setEnabled(false); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.setClickable(false); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.setBackgroundColor(Color.LTGRAY); } else if(orderStatus == 3 || orderStatus == 2 || orderStatus == 1) { Long n = acceptTime.getTime(); Log.i("Preparation Start Time :-", Long.toString(n)); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete.setTag(list.get(position)); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete.setBase(SystemClock.elapsedRealtime() - System.currentTimeMillis() + n); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete.getBase(); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete.start(); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete.setFormat("%s"); } viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(final View v) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub if (flagDeliveryComplete == 0) { flagDeliveryComplete++; v.startAnimation(playAnimation()); handler.postDelayed(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub v.clearAnimation(); OrderitemdetailsBO orderitemdetailsBO = list.get(position); Date date = orderitemdetailsBO.getPreparationstarttime(); String preparationComplete = orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderpreparationtime(); if(date != null && preparationComplete != null ) { Date currentTime = new Date(); Calendar calendar = Calendar.getInstance(); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete.stop(); orderitemdetailsBO.setOrderdeliverytime(calendar.get(Calendar.MINUTE) +":"+calendar.get(Calendar.SECOND)); String orderDetails = Integer.toString(order_delivered); String getPosition = Integer.toString(position); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.setBackgroundColor(Color.LTGRAY); new sendOrderStatusToServer().execute(orderDetails,getPosition); } else { Toast.makeText(myContext, "Please Enter Preparation Start Time & Preparation Complete Time.", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show(); } } }, 5000); } else { handler.removeCallbacksAndMessages(null); v.clearAnimation(); flagDeliveryComplete = 0; } } }); } return convertView; } } private static class ViewHolder { protected TextView txtTableNumber; protected TextView txtMenuItem; protected TextView txtQuantity; protected TextView txtOrderAcceptanceTime; protected Chronometer txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance; protected Button btnPreparationStart; protected Chronometer txtElapsedTimeForPreparation; protected Button btnPreparationComplete; protected Chronometer txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete; protected Button btnDeliveryComplete; }

    Read the article

  • (static initialization order?!) problems with factory pattern

    - by smerlin
    Why does following code raise an exception (in createObjects call to map::at) alternativly the code (and its output) can be viewed here intererestingly the code works as expected if the commented lines are uncommented with both microsoft and gcc compiler (see here), this even works with initMap as ordinary static variable instead of static getter. The only reason for this i can think of is that the order of initialization of the static registerHelper_ object (factory_helper_)and the std::map object (initMap) are wrong, however i cant see how that could happen, because the map object is constructed on first usage and thats in factory_helper_ constructor, so everything should be alright shouldnt it ? I am even more suprised that those doNothing() lines fix the issue, because that call to doNothing() would happen after the critical section (which currently fails) is passed anyway. EDIT: debugging showed, that without the call to factory_helper_.doNothing(), the constructor of factory_helper_ is never called. #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <map> #define FACTORY_CLASS(classtype) \ extern const char classtype##_name_[] = #classtype; \ class classtype : FactoryBase<classtype,classtype##_name_> namespace detail_ { class registerHelperBase { public: registerHelperBase(){} protected: static std::map<std::string, void * (*)(void)>& getInitMap() { static std::map<std::string, void * (*)(void)>* initMap = 0; if(!initMap) initMap= new std::map<std::string, void * (*)(void)>(); return *initMap; } }; template<class TParent, const char* ClassName> class registerHelper_ : registerHelperBase { static registerHelper_ help_; public: //void doNothing(){} registerHelper_(){ getInitMap()[std::string(ClassName)]=&TParent::factory_init_; } }; template<class TParent, const char* ClassName> registerHelper_<TParent,ClassName> registerHelper_<TParent,ClassName>::help_; } class Factory : detail_::registerHelperBase { private: Factory(); public: static void* createObject(const std::string& objclassname) { return getInitMap().at(objclassname)(); } }; template <class TClass, const char* ClassName> class FactoryBase { private: static detail_::registerHelper_<FactoryBase<TClass,ClassName>,ClassName> factory_helper_; static void* factory_init_(){ return new TClass();} public: friend class detail_::registerHelper_<FactoryBase<TClass,ClassName>,ClassName>; FactoryBase(){ //factory_helper_.doNothing(); } virtual ~FactoryBase(){}; }; template <class TClass, const char* ClassName> detail_::registerHelper_<FactoryBase<TClass,ClassName>,ClassName> FactoryBase<TClass,ClassName>::factory_helper_; FACTORY_CLASS(Test) { public: Test(){} }; int main(int argc, char** argv) { try { Test* test = (Test*) Factory::createObject("Test"); } catch(const std::exception& ex) { std::cerr << "caught std::exception: "<< ex.what() << std::endl; } #ifdef _MSC_VER system("pause"); #endif return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Design Pattern for error handling in ASP.NET 3.5 site

    - by Kevin
    I am relatively new to ASP.NET programming, and web programming in general. We have a site we recently ported from .NET 1.1 to 3.5. Currently we have two methods of error handling: either catching the error during data load on a page and displaying the formatted error in a label on the page, or redirecting to a generic error page. Both of these are somewhat annoying, as right now I'm trying to redesign how our errors are displayed. We are soon moving to Master pages, and I'm wondering if there is a way to "build in" an error handling control. What I mean by this is using a ASP.NET user control I've designed that simply gets passed the error string returned from the server. If an error occurs, the page would not display the content, and instead display the error control. This provides us with the ability to retain the current banner/navigation during an error (which we don't get with the generic error page), as well as keeping me from having to add the control to every aspx page we have (which I have to do with using the label-per-page system). Does something like this make sense? Ultimately I just want to have the error control added to a single page, and all other pages have access to it directly. Is this something Master pages help with? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET - ViewState: empty placeholder generates view state

    - by Budda
    On my web-page I have PlaceHolder, not controls are loaded into it. <asp:PlaceHolder ID="PlaceHolderStatMain" runat="server"> </asp:PlaceHolder> I am looking the ViewState generated for the page, it is the following: <input type="hidden" name="__VIEWSTATE" id="__VIEWSTATE" value="/wEPDwUJLTg1NDkyNTUzD2QWAgIDD2QWAgIND2QWAmYPZBYCAgEPZBYCZg9kFgJmD2QWBmYPFQEYL3N0YXRfc3RhZGl1bS9sZWFndWVfV0VGZAIBDxUBGC9zdGF0X3N0YWRpdW0vbGVhZ3VlX0VFRmQCAg8VARgvc3RhdF9zdGFkaXVtL2xlYWd1ZV9GQ1VkZEuSBUr5LFL6WfCehNBJgjrq0GzwWCWN2qlU70V7LAAb" /> When I set EnableViewState to false: <asp:PlaceHolder ID="PlaceHolderStatMain" runat="server" EnableViewState="false"> </asp:PlaceHolder> The viewstate content was decreased significantly: <input type="hidden" name="__VIEWSTATE" id="__VIEWSTATE" value="/wEPDwUJLTg1NDkyNTUzZGTTn8Y28VwmpE/K7yPPkLFvhrqMdU8THijFW/BMFzk0tQ==" /> Question: how to remove 'useless' viewstate content without disabling viewstate for placeholder himself (I would like other control loaded into placeholder to has viewstate)? Is it possible at all? Any thought are welcome! P.S. I am using ASP.NET 4.0

    Read the article

  • How do you pass or share variables between django views?

    - by Hugh
    Hi, I'm kind of lost as to how to do this: I have some chained select boxes, with one select box per view. Each choice should be saved so that a query is built up. At the end, the query should be run. But how do you share state in django? I can pass from view to template, but not template to view and not view to view. Or I'm truly not sure how to do this. Please help!

    Read the article

  • How to store UISegmentedControle state in NSUserdefaults

    - by Chrizzz
    The problem is when de selectedSegmentIndex is unselected: "UISegmentedControlNoSegment" alias "-1". The other states (0, 1, 2 , etc.), I can store as Integers and retrieve with carTypeSegmentedControl.selectedSegmentIndex = [defaults integerForKey:@"typeOfCar"]; But -1 is no NSInteger. I also tried to remove the Integer out of the NSUserdefaults but a request would return an "0", which is not acceptable. So, is there another easy way? tnx for reading

    Read the article

  • Routing in Php and decorator pattern

    - by Joey Salac Hipolito
    I do not know if I am using the term 'routing' correctly, but here is the situation: I created an .htaccess file to 'process' (dunno if my term is right) the url of my application, like this : RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteRule ^(.+)$ index.php?url=$1 [QSA,L] Now I have this : http://appname/controller/method/parameter http://appname/$url[0]/$url[1]/$url[2] What I did is: setup a default controller, in case it is not specified in the url setup a Controller wrapper I did it like this $target = new $url[0]() $controller = new Controller($target) The problem with that one is that I can't use the methods in the object I passed in the constructor of the Controller: I resolved it like this : class Controller { protected $target; protected $view; public function __construct($target, $view) { $this->target = $target; $this->view = $view; } public function __call($method, $arguments) { if (method_exists($this->target, $method)) { return call_user_func_array(array($this->target, $method), $arguments); } } } This is working fine, the problem occurs in the index where I did the routing, here it is if(isset($url[2])){ if(method_exists($controller, $url[1])){ $controller->$url[1]($url[2]) } } else { if(method_exists($controller, $url[1])){ $controller->$url[1]() } } where $controller = new Controller($target) The problem is that the method doesn't exist, although I can use it directly without checking if method exist, how can I resolve this?

    Read the article

  • GWT and Mock the view in MVP pattern

    - by Yannick Eurin
    Hello, i dunno if the question is already ask, but i couldn't find it... i'm searching a way to mock my view in order to test my presenter ? i try to use mockito for the view, and set it in the presenter, but in result in presenter, when i call presenter.getDisplay() (the getter for the view) all of my widget is null ? as i believe it's normal mockito will not mock the widget. i'm 100% sure i mistaken something but i couldnt find it. thanks for your enlightement :)

    Read the article

  • Using the Proxy pattern with C++ iterators

    - by Billy ONeal
    Hello everyone :) I've got a moderately complex iterator written which wraps the FindXFile apis on Win32. (See previous question) In order to avoid the overhead of constructing an object that essentially duplicates the work of the WIN32_FIND_DATAW structure, I have a proxy object which simply acts as a sort of const reference to the single WIN32_FIND_DATAW which is declared inside the noncopyable innards of the iterator. This is great because Clients do not pay for construction of irrelevant information they will probably not use (most of the time people are only interested in file names), and Clients can get at all the information provided by the FindXFile APIs if they need or want this information. This becomes an issue though because there is only ever a single copy of the object's actual data. Therefore, when the iterator is incrememnted, all of the proxies are invalidated (set to whatever the next file pointed to by the iterator is). I'm concerned if this is a major problem, because I can think of a case where the proxy object would not behave as somebody would expect: std::vector<MyIterator::value_type> files; std::copy(MyIterator("Hello"), MyIterator(), std::back_inserter(files)); because the vector contains nothing but a bunch of invalid proxies at that point. Instead, clients need to do something like: std::vector<std::wstring> filesToSearch; std::transform( DirectoryIterator<FilesOnly>(L"C:\\Windows\\*"), DirectoryIterator<FilesOnly>(), std::back_inserter(filesToSearch), std::mem_fun_ref(&DirectoryIterator<FilesOnly>::value_type::GetFullFileName) ); Seeing this, I can see why somebody might dislike what the standard library designers did with std::vector<bool>. I'm still wondering though: is this a reasonable trade off in order to achieve (1) and (2) above? If not, is there any way to still achieve (1) and (2) without the proxy?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71  | Next Page >