Search Results

Search found 28043 results on 1122 pages for 'sql replication'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 657/1122 | < Previous Page | 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664  | Next Page >

  • Need to use query column value in nested subquery

    - by Dustin
    It seems I cannot use a column from the parent query in a sub query. How can I refactor this query to get what I need? dbo.func_getRelatedAcnts returns a table of related accounts (all children from a given account). Events and Profiles are related to accounts. SELECT COUNT(r.reg_id) FROM registrations r JOIN profiles p ON (r.reg_frn_pro_id = p.pro_id) JOIN events e ON (r.reg_frn_evt_id = e.evt_id) WHERE evt_frn_acnt_id NOT IN (SELECT * FROM dbo.func_getRelatedAcnts(p.pro_frn_acnt_id))

    Read the article

  • Looking for MSSQL Table Design Sanity Check for Profile Tables with Dynamic Columns.

    - by Code Sherpa
    I just want a general sanity check regarding database design. We are building a web system that has both Teachers and Students. Both have accounts in the system. Both have profiles in the system. My question is about the table design of those Profile tables. The Teacher profile is pretty static regarding the metadata associated with it. Each teacher has a set number of fields that exposes information about that individual (schools, degrees, etc). The students, however, are a different case. We are using a windows service to pull varying data about the students from an endless stream of excel spreadsheets. The data gets moved into our database and then the fields appear in association with the student's profile. Accordingly, each and every student may have very different fields in their profile. I originally started with the concept of three tables: Accounts ---------- AccountID TeacherProfiles ---------- TeacherProfileID AccountID SecondarySchool University YearsTeaching Etc... StudentProfiles ---------- StudentProfileID AccountID Header Value The StudentProfiles table would hold the name of the column headers from the excel spreadsheets and the associated values. I have since evolved the design a little to treat Profiles more generically per the attached ERD image. The Teacher and Student "Headers" are stored in a table called "ProfileAttributeTypes" and responses (either from the excel document or via input fields on the web form) are put in a ProfileAttributes table. This way both Student and Teacher profiles can be associated with a dynamic flow of profile fields. The "Permissions" table tells us whether we are dealing with a Student or a Teacher. Since this system is likely to grow quickly, I want to make sure the foundation is solid. Can you please provide feedback about this design and let me know if it seems sound or if you could see problems it might create and, if so, what might be a better approach? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Migrating Data to MSSQL 2008

    - by Fred Clown
    I am trying to migrate data from an Informix database to MSSQL 2008. I've got quite a lot of data to move. I've been try multiple methods to get the data over, and so far SQLBulkCopy in multiple chunks seems to be the fastest that I can find. Does anyone know of a faster means of getting the data over? I'm trying to cut down on the transfer time so that on my cut-over date I don't run out of time to do the full cut-over. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • acts-as-taggable-on: find tags with name LIKE, sort by tag_counts?

    - by James
    Hi I'm using the rails plugin acts-as-taggable-onand I'm trying to find the top 5 most used tags whose names match and partially match a given query. When I do User.skill_counts.order('count DESC').limit(5).where('name LIKE ?', params[:query]) This return the following error: ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: SQLite3::SQLException: ambiguous column name: name: SELECT tags.*, COUNT(*) AS count FROM "tags" INNER JOIN users ON users.id = taggings.taggable_id LEFT OUTER JOIN taggings ON tags.id = taggings.tag_id AND taggings.context = 'skills' WHERE (taggings.taggable_type = 'User') AND (taggings.taggable_id IN(SELECT users.id FROM "users")) AND (name LIKE 'asd') GROUP BY tags.id, tags.name HAVING COUNT(*) > 0 ORDER BY count DESC LIMIT 5 But when I do User.skill_counts.first.name this returns "alliteration" I'd appreciate any help on this matter.

    Read the article

  • How to handle Foreign key for optional field in .NET

    - by brz dot net
    What is the best way to handle following situation? A dropdown(for master table) is optional in a particular form. But, In database table the field is constrained with foreign key. If user don't select from dropdown then It creates problem because of foreign key. One solution is to create default option in master table and use it in case of blank selection. but in dropdown, we need to handle this to show on top. Is it perfect solution? Is there any other optimized solution for this? Thanks

    Read the article

  • MySQL: Limit output according to associated ID

    - by Jess
    So here's my situation. I have a books table and authors table. An author can have many books... In my authors page view, the user (logged in) can click an author in a tabled row and be directed to a page displaying the author's books (collected like this URI format: viewauthorbooks.php?author_id=23), very straight forward... However, in my query, I need to display the books for the author only, and not all books stored in the books table (as i currently have!) As I am a complete novice, I used the most simple query of: SELECT * FROM tasks_tb This returns the books for me, but returns every single value (book) in the database, and not ones associated with the selected author. And when I click a different author the same books are displayed for them...I think everyone gets what I'm trying to achieve, I just don't know how to perform the query. I'm guessing that I need to start using more advanced query clauses like INNER JOIN etc. Anyone care to help me out :)

    Read the article

  • Migrating from mssql to firebird: pro and cons

    - by user193655
    i am considering the migration for 3 reasons: 1) SQLSERVER installation is a nightmar, expecially for 1-user software. Software installs in 10 seconds, SQLServer in 1 hour. Firebird installation is much easier. 2) SQLSERVER runs on windows server only 3) My customers have all the express edition 4) i am not using any advanced feature, I am now starting using filestream, but the main reason for this is that Express eidtion has 4/10GB db size limit So these are all Pros of moving to Firebird. Which are the cons? I can also plan to support both platiforms, but this will backfire I fear.

    Read the article

  • Beginner Ques::How to delete records permanently in case of linked tables?

    - by Serenity
    Let's say I have these 2 tables QuesType and Ques:- QuesType QuestypeID|QuesType |Active ------------------------------------ 101 |QuesType1 |True 102 |QuesType2 |True 103 |XXInActiveXX |False Ques QuesID|Ques|Answer|QUesTypeID|Active ------------------------------------ 1 |Ques1|Ans1 |101 |True 2 |Ques2|Ans2 |102 |True 3 |Ques3|Ans3 |101 |True In the QuesType Table:- QuesTypeID is a Primary key In the Ques Table:- QuesID is a Primary key and QuesType ID is the Foreign Key that refernces QuesTypeID from QuesType Table Now I am unable to delete records from QuesType Table, I can only make QuesType inactive by setting Active=False. I am unable to delete QuesTypes permanently because of the Foreign key relation it has with Ques Table. So , I just set the column Active=false and those Questypes then don't show on my grid wen its binded. What I want to do is be able to delete any QuesType permamnently. Now it can only be deleted if its not being used anywhere in the Ques table, right? So to delete any QuesType permanently I thot this is what I could do:- In the grid that displays QuesTypes, I have this check box for Active and a button for delete.What I thot was, when a user makes some QuesType inactive then OnCheckChanged() event will run and that will have the code to delete all the Questions in Ques table that are using that QuesTypeID. Then on the QuesType grid, that QuesType would show as Deactivated and only then can a user delete it permanently. Am I thinking correctly? Currently in my DeleteQuesType Stored Procedure what I am doing is:- Setting the Active=false and Setting QuesTye= some string like XXInactiveXX Is there any other way?

    Read the article

  • How can i learn Table Name in database an column name?

    - by Phsika
    How can i learn table Name in database an how can i learn any Table's Column name? SELECT Col.COLUMN_NAME, Col.DATA_TYPE FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS AS Col LEFT OUTER JOIN INFORMATION_SCHEMA.CONSTRAINT_COLUMN_USAGE AS Usg ON Col.TABLE_NAME = Usg.TABLE_NAME AND Col.COLUMN_NAME = Usg.COLUMN_NAME LEFT OUTER JOIN INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS AS Con ON Usg.CONSTRAINT_NAME = Con.CONSTRAINT_NAME WHERE Col.TABLE_NAME = 'Addresses_Temp' AND Con.Constraint_TYPE = 'PRIMARY KEY' But it returns to me empty data:(

    Read the article

  • get records from sqlite group by month

    - by peacmaker
    hi i hve an sqlite db which contain transactions each transaction has an price and has an transDate i want to retrieve the sum of the transaction group by month so the retrieved records should be like the following Price month 230 2 500 3 400 4 pleas any help

    Read the article

  • Does AsEnumerable() cache all result (LINQ)

    - by Akshay
    When we call a query operator on a sequence, a sequence-specific operator gets called. I mean if i call Where<>() operator on IEnumerable<>, the operator that will be called will be defined in Enumerable class and if it's called on IQueryable<>, the one defined in Queryable class will be called. Consider the operator Reverse, defined in the Enumerable class. If i want to call it on Iqueryable<> then I must use the AsEnumerable<>() operator to first convert it into IEnumerable<>. db.Countries.OrderBy(cntry=>cntry.CountryName).AsEnumerable().Reverse() But the Reverse operator got to have all records at the same time so that it can reverse them. In the above code do all the records get loaded in memory first and then the Reverse() operator is reversing it ?

    Read the article

  • PHP - Language Data

    - by bobrusha
    What's the best way to store language data? Keep it as variables in some kind of lang.php file... $l_ipsum = 'smth'; $l_rand = 'string'; Or select them from a database? I'm in search of your advice.

    Read the article

  • SQLException: incorrect syntax near '2'.

    - by Tobechukwu Ezenachukwu
    whenever I call the "ExecuteNonQuery" command on the following CommandText, I get the above SQLException myCommand.CommandText = "INSERT INTO fixtures (round_id, matchcode, date_utc, time_utc, date_london, time_london, team_A_id, team_A, team_A_country, team_B_id, team_B, team_B_country, status, gameweek, winner, fs_A, fs_B, hts_A, hts_B, ets_A, ets_B, ps_A, ps_B, last_updated) VALUES (" _ & round_id & "," & match_id & "," & date_utc & ",'" & time_utc & "'," & date_london & ",'" & time_london & "'," & team_A_id & ",'" & team_A_name & "','" & team_A_country & "'," & team_B_id & ",'" & team_B_name & "','" & _ team_B_country & "','" & status & "'," & gameweek & ",'" & winner & "'," & fs_A & "," & fs_B & "," & hts_A & "," & hts_B & "," & ets_A & "," & ets_B & "," & ps_A & "," & ps_B & "," & last_updated & ")" But whenever, i remove the last table item - "last_updated", the error disappears. Please help me resolve this issue. Is there any special treatment to be given to datetime fields??? Thanks for your help

    Read the article

  • MySQL: selecting totals as three fields from same table as one query?

    - by coderama
    I have a table with various orders in it: ID | Date | etc... 1 | 2013-01-01 | etc 2 | 2013-02-01 | etc 3 | 2013-03-01 | etc 4 | 2013-04-01 | etc 5 | 2013-05-01 | etc 6 | 2013-06-01 | etc 7 | 2013-06-01 | etc 8 | 2013-03-01 | etc 9 | 2013-04-01 | etc 10 | 2013-05-01 | etc I want a query that ends wit the result: overallTotal | totalThisMonth | totalLastMonth 10 | 2 | 1 But I want to do this in one query! I am trying to find a way to use subqueries to do this. SO far I have: SELECT * from ( SELECT count(*) as overallTotal from ORDERS ) How can I combine this with other subqueries so I can get the totals in one query?

    Read the article

  • data filter using dataloadoptions

    - by Tassadaque
    Using dataloadoptions i have tried the following example Northwnd db = new Northwnd(@"northwnd.mdf"); // Preload Orders for Customer. // One directive per relationship to be preloaded. DataLoadOptions ds = new DataLoadOptions(); ds.LoadWith<Customer>(c => c.Orders); ds.AssociateWith<Customer> (c => c.Orders.Where(p => p.ShippedDate != DateTime.Today)); db.LoadOptions = ds; var custQuery = from cust in db.Customers where cust.City == "London" select cust; foreach (Customer custObj in custQuery) { Console.WriteLine("Customer ID: {0}", custObj.CustomerID); foreach (Order ord in custObj.Orders) { Console.WriteLine("\tOrder ID: {0}", ord.OrderID); foreach (OrderDetail detail in ord.OrderDetails) { Console.WriteLine("\t\tProduct ID: {0}", detail.ProductID); } } } Now i need to ask how can i display Category ID and Category Name of the productID (i am supposing that One product can be in at most one category) by extending the above example Regards

    Read the article

  • Highlight row in report?

    - by sanjeev40084
    I have a SSRS report which displays hundred of rows. I was wondering if there is anyway i can highlight the rows so that i can easily know on which row i am while accessing the report. Any thoughts?

    Read the article

  • DB Interface Design Optimization: Is it better to optimise for Fewer requests of smaller data size?

    - by Overflow
    The prevailing wisdom in webservices/web requests in general is to design your api such that you use as few requests as possible, and that each request returns therefore as much data as is needed In database design, the accepted wisdom is to design your queries to minimise size over the network, as opposed to minimizing the number of queries. They are both remote calls, so what gives?

    Read the article

  • Procedure Maximum stored procedure, function, trigger, or view nesting level exceeded (limit 32).

    - by Nick
    The stored proc is failing at below location,Thanks, for all your help. --Insert MSOrg Information DECLARE @PersonnelNumber int, @MSOrg varchar(255) DECLARE csr CURSOR FAST_FORWARD FOR SELECT PersonnelNumber FROM Person OPEN csr FETCH NEXT FROM csr INTO @PersonnelNumber WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0 BEGIN EXEC GetMSOrg @PersonnelNumber, @MSOrg out INSERT INTO PersonSubject ( PersonnelNumber ,SubjectID ,SubjectValue ,Created ,Updated ) SELECT @PersonnelNumber ,SubjectID ,@MSOrg ,getDate() ,getDate() FROM Subject WHERE DisplayName = 'MS Org' FETCH NEXT FROM csr INTO @PersonnelNumber END CLOSE csr DEALLOCATE csr Below is the stored prc defination GetMSOrg and fails at third condition CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[GetMSOrg] ( @PersonnelNumber int ,@OrgTerm varchar(200) out ) AS DECLARE @MDRTermID int ,@ReportsToPersonnelNbr int --Check to see if we have reached the top of the chart SELECT @ReportsToPersonnelNbr = ReportsToPersonnelNbr FROM ReportsTo WHERE PersonnelNumber = @PersonnelNumber IF (@ReportsToPersonnelNbr IS NULL) --Reached the Top of the Org Ladder BEGIN SET @OrgTerm = 'Non-standard rollup' END ELSE IF (@PersonnelNumber IN (SELECT PersonnelNumber FROM OrgTermMap)) BEGIN SELECT @OrgTerm = s.Term FROM OrgTermMap tm JOIN Taxonomy..StaticHierarchy s ON tm.OrgTermID = s.TermID WHERE tm.PersonnelNumber = @PersonnelNumber END ELSE BEGIN SELECT @MDRTermID = tm.OrgTermID FROM ReportsTo r JOIN OrgTermMap tm ON r.ReportsToPersonnelNbr = tm.PersonnelNumber WHERE r.PersonnelNumber = @PersonnelNumber IF (@MDRTermID IS NULL) BEGIN EXEC GetMSOrg @ReportsToPersonnelNbr, @OrgTerm out END ELSE BEGIN SELECT @OrgTerm = Term FROM Taxonomy..StaticHierarchy WHERE VocabID = 118 AND TermID = @MDRTermID END END GO

    Read the article

  • (NOT) NULL for NVARCHAR columns

    - by Anders Abel
    Allowing NULL values on a column is normally done to allow the absense of a value to be represented. When using NVARCHAR there is aldready a possibility to have an empty string, without setting the column to NULL. In most cases I cannot see a semantical difference between an NVARCHAR with an empty string and a NULL value for such a column. Setting the column as NOT NULL saves me from having to deal with the possibility of NULL values in the code and it feels better to not have to different representations of "no value" (NULL or an empty string). Will I run into any other problems by setting my NVARCHAR columns to NOT NULL. Performance? Storage size? Anything I've overlooked on the usage of the values in the client code?

    Read the article

  • How can I kill MySQL queries every 60 seconds in Windows?

    - by Ethan Allen
    I want to check my MySQL server every minute and kill queries that have run longer than 150 seconds. The main reason I want to do this is because I don't want queries from certain people to lock up the DB for everyone else. I know this is not the ultimate solution to the problem, but at least it's a fallback in case something goes wrong with a query. I don't have a slave DB (this is just an at-home project). I'd like to schedule a script to run that does this for me. I'm unfamiliar with Perl or Ruby and I need it done on my Windows 2008 Server box. I've looked into creating a simple cmd line script, but that doesn't seem to be possible. I know currently I can do something like this but I have to do it manually: mysqladmin processlist mysqladmin kill Anyone have any ideas or examples on how I could do this?

    Read the article

  • Voting Script, Possibility of Simplifying Database Queries

    - by Sev
    I have a voting script which stores the post_id and the user_id in a table, to determine whether a particular user has already voted on a post and disallow them in the future. To do that, I am doing the following 3 queries. SELECT user_id, post_id from votes_table where postid=? AND user_id=? If that returns no rows, then: UPDATE post_table set votecount = votecount-1 where post_id = ? Then SELECT votecount from post where post_id=? To display the new votecount on the web page Any better way to do this? 3 queries are seriously slowing down the user's voting experience Edit In the votes table, vote_id is a primary key In the post table, post_id is a primary key. Any other suggestions to speed things up?

    Read the article

  • How to: Display multiple related classes in an ASP.NET GridView ?

    - by kversch
    I would like to display students and their grades with a GridView and LinqToSQL like this: assignment1 assignment2 Student 1 55 89 Student 2 87 56 Student 3 92 34 I found this topic but it doesn't answer my question: http://forums.asp.net/t/1557987.aspx I have a many-to-many relationship between students and assignments called "grades". The grade for the assignment is stored in that table in a "gradeNumber" column. I would also like to specify which assignments should be displayed in the grid. Btw, my LINQ entities are extended to allow me to write/get studentx.Assignments or assignmentx.Students.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664  | Next Page >