Search Results

Search found 36013 results on 1441 pages for 'public fields'.

Page 658/1441 | < Previous Page | 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665  | Next Page >

  • Two methods with different signatures, jquery is not calling correct method

    - by Lee
    There are two methods GetUserAssignedSystems() and GetUserAssignedSystems(string Id) These methods act very differently from each other. The problem is, when I want to call GetUserAssignedSystems(string Id), the parameter-less method is called. Here are the methods: [WebMethod] [ScriptMethod] public IEnumerable GetUserAssignedSystems(string cacId) { return Data.UserManager.GetUserAssingedSystems(cacId); } [WebMethod] [ScriptMethod] public IEnumerable GetUserAssignedSystems() { //do something else } Here is the jquery making the call: CallMfttService("ServiceLayer/UserManager.asmx/GetUserAssignedSystems", "{'cacId':'" + $('#EditUserCacId').val() + "'}", function(result) { for (var userSystem in result.d) { $('input[UserSystemID=' + result.d[userSystem] + ']').attr('checked', 'true'); } }); Any ideas why this method is being ignored?

    Read the article

  • [C#] How to create a constructor of a class that return a collection of instances of that class?

    - by codemonkie
    My program has the following class definition: public sealed class Subscriber { private subscription; public Subscriber(int id) { using (DataContext dc = new DataContext()) { this.subscription = dc._GetSubscription(id).SingleOrDefault(); } } } ,where _GetSubscription() is a sproc which returns a value of type ISingleResult<_GetSubscriptionResult> Say, I have a list of type List<int> full of 1000 ids and I want to create a collection of subscribers of type List<Subscriber>. How can I do that without calling the constructor in a loop for 1000 times? Since I am trying to avoid switching the DataContext on/off so frequently that may stress the database. TIA.

    Read the article

  • How do I set up Array/List dependencies in code with Castle Windsor?

    - by SharePoint Newbie
    Hi, I have the following classes: class Repository : IRepository class ReadOnlyRepository : Repository abstract class Command abstract CommandImpl : Command { public CommandImpl(Repository repository){} } class Service { public Service (Command[] commands){} } I register them in code as follows: var container = new Container("WindsorCOntainer.config"); var container = new WindsorContainer(new XmlInterpreter("WindsorConfig.xml")); container.Kernel.Resolver.AddSubResolver(new ArrayResolver(container.Kernel)); container.AddComponent("repository", typeof(RentServiceRepository)); container.Resolve<RentServiceRepository>(); container.AddComponent("command", typeof(COmmandImpl)); container.AddComponent("rentService", typeof (RentService)); container.Resolve<RentService>(); // Fails here I get the message that "RentService is waiting for dependency commands" What am I doing wrong? Thanks,

    Read the article

  • Binding in ContentControl Crash

    - by ImJames
    Can anyone tell me why this crashes my app? There seems to be some endless recursion by I can't figure out why. I get this exception Logical tree depth exceeded while traversing the tree. This could indicate a cycle in the tree <ContentControl Content="{Binding}"> <ContentControl.ContentTemplate> <DataTemplate> <Button Content="{Binding MyString}"/> </DataTemplate> </ContentControl.ContentTemplate> </ContentControl> And this is all I have as Source public MainWindow() { InitializeComponent(); MyString = "Test"; this.DataContext = this; } public string MyString { get; set; }

    Read the article

  • Java: Allowing the child thread to kill itself on InterruptedException?

    - by Zombies
    I am using a ThreadPool via ExecutorService. By calling shutDownNow() it interrupts all running threads in the pool. When this happens I want these threads to give up their resources (socket and db connections) and simply die, but without continuing to run anymore logic, eg: inserting anything into the DB. What is the simplest way to achieve this? Bellow is some sample code: public void threadTest() { Thread t = new Thread(new Runnable() { public void run() { try { Thread.sleep(999999); } catch (InterruptedException e) { //invoke thread suicide logic here } } }); t.start(); t.interrupt(); try { Thread.sleep(4000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { } }

    Read the article

  • Print an EObject ?

    - by tul
    I am writing some eclipse emf code and would like to print the content of an EObject (not store it to disk). Here is what I try: public static void print(EObject obj) { Resource eResource = obj.eResource(); try { eResource.save(System.out, null); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } but that gives a NullPointerException. I have tried this instead: public static void print(EObject obj) { ResourceSet resourceSet = new ResourceSetImpl(); resourceSet.getResourceFactoryRegistry().getProtocolToFactoryMap() .put("*", new XMIResourceFactoryImpl()); Resource resource = resourceSet.createResource(URI.createURI("dummyfile.xml")); resource.getContents().add(obj); try { resource.save(System.out, null); } catch (IOException ioe) { ioe.printStackTrace(); } } This works, but is it not possible to print to screen without specifying a dummy URI??

    Read the article

  • updated validation example for web api

    - by MonkeyBonkey
    I tried the validation example code for web api on the latest mvc 4 download and I'm getting some errors. Does anyone have an updated example of the ValidationActionFilter class. Here's the original code public class ValidationActionFilter : ActionFilterAttribute { public override void OnActionExecuting(HttpActionContext context) { var modelState = context.ModelState; if (!modelState.IsValid) { dynamic errors = new JsonObject(); foreach (var key in modelState.Keys) { var state = modelState[key]; if (state.Errors.Any()) { errors[key] = state.Errors.First().ErrorMessage; } } context.Response = new HttpResponseMessage<JsonValue>(errors, HttpStatusCode.BadRequest); } } } I'm getting an error on HttpResponseMessage The non-generic type 'System.Net.Http.HttpResponseMessage' cannot be used with type arguments Also it looks like I need to add a Json reference, but should I be using JSON.net instead? An example of this using Json.net?

    Read the article

  • how to truncate an double datatype value variable

    - by prince23
    hi, i have an class public class Score { public double marks { get; set; } } now in my code List<Level1> Obj= new List<Level1>(); Score Object= new Score(); l1.marks=94.345454; Obj.Add(Object) // now whiling adding the object to list i need to trunacte the value to 94.34 and store in the list obj. so that i need to get output has 94.34 how can i do it. thanks in advance prince

    Read the article

  • How to stop an event for raising

    - by Akshay
    Hi, I have Two fields, one textbox nad one Div element. I have onblur event for textbox, and onclick event for div element. when i click the div element the textbox's onblur event occurs and not the onclick event of div element. how to supress the onblur event when i click on the div element Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • How can I delete a specific element in priority queue?

    - by Yuan
    import java.util.*; public class test4 { public static void main(String[] args){ PriorityQueue[] P = new PriorityQueue[10]; P[1] = new PriorityQueue<ClassEntry>(); P[1].add(new ClassEntry(1.2,1)); P[1].add(new ClassEntry(1.5,2)); P[1].add(new ClassEntry(1.2,3)); P[1].add(new ClassEntry(10,4)); P[1].remove(new ClassEntry(10,4));//I can't delete this object??? System.out.println(P[1].size()); ClassEntry ce = (ClassEntry) P[1].peek(); System.out.println(P[1].size()); System.out.println(ce.sim+"\t"+ce.index); } } Why i can't delete (10,4)? Can somebody teach how to implement...thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to make c# don't call destructor of a instance

    - by Bình Nguyên
    I have two forms and form1 needs to get data from form2, i use a parameter in form2 constructor to gets form1's instance like this: public form2(Form form1) { this.f = form1; } and in form1: Form form2 = new Form(this); But it seem form1 destruct was called when i closed form1. my question is how can i avoid this problem? EDIT: I have many typing mistakes in my question, i'm so sorry, fixed: I have two forms and form2 needs to get data from form1, i use a parameter in form1 constructor to gets form1's instance like this: private Form f; public form2(Form form1) { this.f = form1; } and in form1: Form form2 = new Form(this); But it seem form1 destruct was called when i closed form2. my question is how can i avoid this problem?

    Read the article

  • UTC date and time

    - by klaus-vlad
    Hi, How can I obtain the current UTC time and date using a gps location changed lsitener ? public void onLocationChanged(Location lastLocation) { lastLocation.getTime() }

    Read the article

  • Static methods requiring var

    - by Charlie Pigarelli
    Ok, i'm stuck on this, why don't i get what i need? class config { private $config; # Load configurations public function __construct() { loadConfig('site'); // load a file with $cf in it loadConfig('database'); // load another file with $cf in it $this->config = $cf; // $cf is an array unset($cf); } # Get a configuration public static function get($tag, $name) { return $this->config[$tag][$name]; } } I'm getting this: Fatal error: Using $this when not in object context in [this file] on line 22 [return $this->config[$tag][$name];] And i need to call the method in this way: config::get()...

    Read the article

  • import a text file into a temporary table using 'Load data infile' in a stored procedure- MySQL

    - by Pankaj
    I need to import a text file into a temporary table and from that select portions of it to insert in different tables. I wanted to use 'LOAD DATA INFILE'. Is there any way, i can use 'Load data infile' in a stored procedure. I am using mysql. LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE 'C:\\MyData.txt' INTO TABLE tempprod fields terminated by ',' lines terminated by '\r\n'; SELECT * FROM product p;

    Read the article

  • How to Dispose myClass with Garbage Collecter C#

    - by Ibrahim AKGUN
    Hi, I have a class and got a method that doin so many things in memory and need to be disposed when its jobs done.But i have looked for MSDN for solution.There is an example thats not solved my problem.When my Class is instanced and run this method my memory is getting bigger and bigger.How can i Dispose it when its job done ? Here is my CODES ; class Deneme { public Deneme() { } ~Deneme() { GC.Collect(); GC.SuppressFinalize(this); } public void TestMetodu() { System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox.Show("Test"); // This is my method that doing big jobs :) } } Deneme CCCX = new Deneme(); CCCX.TestMetodu(); CCCX = null; So i cant dispose it with this.

    Read the article

  • how to call context menu

    - by gdonald
    I open my context menu like this: private OnClickListener optionsClickListener = new OnClickListener() { public void onClick( View v ) { registerForContextMenu( v ); openContextMenu( v ); } }; How can I call registerForContextMenu( v ); openContextMenu( v ); from inside my regular menu handler here: public boolean onOptionsItemSelected( MenuItem item ) { switch( item.getItemId() ) { case OPTIONS: registerForContextMenu( v ); openContextMenu( v ); return true; where I have no View to pass?

    Read the article

  • Java Flow Control Problem

    - by Kyle_Solo
    I am programming a simple 2d game engine. I've decided how I'd like the engine to function: it will be composed of objects containing "events" that my main game loop will trigger when appropriate. A little more about the structure: Every GameObject has an updateEvent method. objectList is a list of all the objects that will receive update events. Only objects on this list have their updateEvent method called by the game loop. I’m trying to implement this method in the GameObject class (This specification is what I’d like the method to achieve): /** * This method removes a GameObject from objectList. The GameObject * should immediately stop executing code, that is, absolutely no more * code inside update events will be executed for the removed game object. * If necessary, control should transfer to the game loop. * @param go The GameObject to be removed */ public void remove(GameObject go) So if an object tries to remove itself inside of an update event, control should transfer back to the game engine: public void updateEvent() { //object's update event remove(this); System.out.println("Should never reach here!"); } Here’s what I have so far. It works, but the more I read about using exceptions for flow control the less I like it, so I want to see if there are alternatives. Remove Method public void remove(GameObject go) { //add to removedList //flag as removed //throw an exception if removing self from inside an updateEvent } Game Loop for(GameObject go : objectList) { try { if (!go.removed) { go.updateEvent(); } else { //object is scheduled to be removed, do nothing } } catch(ObjectRemovedException e) { //control has been transferred back to the game loop //no need to do anything here } } // now remove the objects that are in removedList from objectList 2 questions: Am I correct in assuming that the only way to implement the stop-right-away part of the remove method as described above is by throwing a custom exception and catching it in the game loop? (I know, using exceptions for flow control is like goto, which is bad. I just can’t think of another way to do what I want!) For the removal from the list itself, it is possible for one object to remove one that is farther down on the list. Currently I’m checking a removed flag before executing any code, and at the end of each pass removing the objects to avoid concurrent modification. Is there a better, preferably instant/non-polling way to do this?

    Read the article

  • ListView created programmatically - emptyView doesn't show

    - by Yorick
    I've created custom ListView programmatically, and set view to show when ListAdapter is empty but nothing shows on the screen in that case, what can be wrong? public PlayerList(Context context, Activity activity) { super(context); mParent = activity; setOnItemClickListener( new OnItemClickListener() { public void onItemClick(AdapterView<?> parent, View view, int position, long id) { ... } }; List<PlayerInfo> players; players = getPlayerList(); // here size of players == 0 setAdapter(new PlayersAdapter(this.getContext(), R.id.player_name, players)); LayoutInflater vi = (LayoutInflater)mParent.getSystemService(Context.LAYOUT_INFLATER_SERVICE); emptyView = vi.inflate(R.layout.empty_view, null); // emptyView is View, and member of PlayerList this.setEmptyView(emptyView); }

    Read the article

  • Converting BindingList(Of T) to Array

    - by George
    Public Class Orders Inherits System.ComponentModel.BindingList(Of Order) End Class Public Sub DataBind(ByVal Orders() As Orders) End Sub Dim MyOrders() As Order = Orders.ToArray SuperListBinder.DataBind(MyOrders) '<<Error occurs on this line I don't understand this error. I think that I am passing the appropriate data type to a sub. I don't understand the meaning of "Cannot convert object of type x to an object of type x! Note that, if relevant, my Solution File contains ,multiple projects and that they are all project references. Error: Error 1 Value of type '1-dimensional array of BESI.BusinessObjects.Order' cannot be converted to '1-dimensional array of BESI.BusinessObjects.Orders' because 'BESI.BusinessObjects.Order' is not derived from 'BESI.BusinessObjects.Orders'. C:\My\Code\BESI\BesiAdmin\Forms\Activity.vb 17 34 BesiAdmin

    Read the article

  • C# Closing a form during a constructor

    - by pm_2
    Is it possible to close a form while the constructor is executing (or simply to stop it showing at this stage)? I have the following code: public partial class MyForm : Form { public MyForm() { if (MyFunc()) { this.Close(); } } } Which errors in Main(), here: static void Main() { ... // Following line errors Application.Run(new MyForm()); } I’ve tried checking the result of MyForm like this: static void Main() { ... MyForm frm = new MyForm(); if (frm != null) { // Following line errors Application.Run(frm); } } But that doesn’t seem to help. Can anyone tell me a way around this, please? Maybe a way to check the form to see if it still exists?

    Read the article

  • identify the input that is multiple of 11 and odd or even java

    - by Bolor Ch
    i am trying to write code to determine the nature of input using if statement only. The nature of input could be following: a multiple of 11 even or odd. For the code below, when I enter my input, it does not display the result as "input:NOT:ODD". Also how can I check multiple conditions with if statement? (else is not considered) import java.util.Scanner; public class test { public static void main( String args[] ) { Scanner input = new Scanner( System.in ); int x; int EO; int Mult; System.out.print ( "Enter value: " ); x = input.nextInt(); EO = x % 2; Mult = x % 11; if (EO > 0 && Mult > 0) { System.out.printf ("%d:NOT:ODD"); } } }

    Read the article

  • Undefined behaviour with non-virtual destructors - is it a real-world issue?

    - by Roddy
    Consider the following code: class A { public: A() {} ~A() {} }; class B: public A { B() {} ~B() {} }; A* b = new B; delete b; // undefined behaviour My understanding is that the C++ standard says that deleting b is undefined behaviour - ie, anything could happen. But, in the real world, my experience is that ~A() is always invoked, and the memory is correctly freed. if B introduces any class members with their own destructors, they won't get invoked, but I'm only interested in the simple kind of case above, where inheritance is used maybe to fix a bug in one class method for which source code is unavailable. Obviously this isn't going to be what you want in non-trivial cases, but it is at least consistent. Are you aware of any C++ implementation where the above does NOT happen, for the code shown?

    Read the article

  • C++ allocate objects on heap of base class with protected constructors via inheritance

    - by KRao
    I have a class with protected constructor: class B { protected: B(){}; }; Now I derive from it and define two static functions and I manage to actually create objects of the class B, but not on the heap: class A : public B { public: static B createOnStack() {return B();} //static B* createOnHeap() {return new B;} //Compile time Error on VS2010 }; B b = A::createOnStack(); //This works on VS2010! The question is: 1) Is VS2010 wrong in allowing the first case? 2) Is it possible to create objects of B without modifying B in any way (no friendship and no extra functions). I am asking, because it is possible to make something similar when dealing with instances of B and its member functions, see: http://accu.org/index.php/journals/296 Thank you in advance for any suggestion! Kind regards

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665  | Next Page >