Search Results

Search found 55886 results on 2236 pages for 'advanced net'.

Page 662/2236 | < Previous Page | 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669  | Next Page >

  • How do I restrict the WCF service called by an ASP.NET AJAX page to only allow calls for that page?

    - by NovaJoe
    I have an AjaxControlToolkit DynamicPopulate control that is updated by calls to a WCF service. I know I can check the HttpContext in the service request to see if a user of the page (and thus, the control) is authenticated. However, I don't want anyone clever to be able to call the service directly, even if they're logged in. I want access to the service to be allowed ONLY to requests that are made from the page. Mainly, I don't want anyone to be able to programatically make a large number of calls and then reverse-engineer the algorithm that sits behind the service. Any clever ideas on how this can be done? Maybe I'm over-thinking this? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • How to provide translations for items in a ASP.Net custom web control (.ascx)?

    - by paul
    How do I go about providing localised text for items in a custom web control? I had thought that I just need to add meta.resourcekey tags to the control items and then define and fill some resource files called mycontrol.ascx.[lang].resx but that doesn't seem to work. e.g. MyControl.ascx <asp:Label ID="Label1" meta:resourcekey="Label1" runat="server" Text="Oops!"></asp:Label> MyControl.ascx.de.resx Label1.Text Donner und Blitzen!

    Read the article

  • Using Session State in Public Class in ASP.NET?

    - by davemackey
    I'm trying to move some reusable portions of code into a class. This is working okay except when I attempt to use Session within this class. I get an error: "Cannot refer to an instance member of a class from within a shared method or shared member initializer without an explicit instance of the class." My code looks something like this: Public Class webHousing Inherits System.Web.UI.Page Public Sub GetUserInfo() Dim x as String x = 10 Session("x")= x End Sub End Class I've simplified this code significantly - but the basic problem is present - trying to set a session value from within a class. I found the following MSDN article1 but don't believe Public/Shared can be used on Session?

    Read the article

  • is there something equivalent to 'Address of' or offset operator in .net?

    - by Gio
    We have nested stuctures as such, used as an interface for some device drivers. On occasion we have to update individual elements. An 'address of' operator would be helpful, but an 'offset' function or operator is what I'm really looking for, but not sure how to go about it. In other words, how far is structureN.elementX away from the start of the structure in bytes? [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct s1 { UInt16 elem1; UInt16 elem2; UInt16 elem3; } [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct s2 { UInt16 elem1; UInt16 elem2; UInt16 elem3; } [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct driver { public S1 s1; public S2 s2; } For instance we need to send the device driver some data to update driver.s1.elem3, by way of providing an offset address, data block and length. We would update our local copy, then call the device api with the afore mentioned data. Not sure I have to do this with 'unsafe' method calls. Any help?

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to override a property and return a derived type in VB.NET?

    - by Casey
    Consider the following classes representing an Ordering system: Public Class OrderBase Public MustOverride Property OrderItem() as OrderItemBase End Class Public Class OrderItemBase End Class Now, suppose we want to extend these classes to a more specific set of order classes, keeping the aggregate nature of OrderBase: Public Class WebOrder Inherits OrderBase Public Overrides Property OrderItem() as WebOrderItem End Property End Class Public Class WebOrderItem Inherits OrderItemBase End Class The Overriden property in the WebOrder class will cause an error stating that the return type is different from that defined in OrderBase... however, the return type is a subclass of the type defined in OrderBase. Why won't VB allow this?

    Read the article

  • How to install ASP.NET MVC 2 templates after already installing VS Web Dev 2010 first?

    - by Lucas McCoy
    First off these questions are related but do not fix my problem: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2499934/ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/652836/ I have installed Visual Studio Web Developer Express Edition 2010, then I installed MVC 2. Now I can successfully run a MVC 2 application, however I have to do the manual imports of the namespaces and stuff. How can I install the templates?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET. Css file in master page.

    - by w1z
    Hi All, In my application I have next problem. I created master page and some content pages, some of which are located in the nested folders. In the master page I added the link to .css file <link href="default.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> But pages are located in the nested folders can't use this .css file. How can I fix this? I want to have one .css file for all pages (: Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Where does ASP.Net get its rendered IDs from?

    - by NeilD
    Hi, I've inherited a project with some nasty JavaScript that depends on hard coded object ids. i.e. There are lots of places where it does things like this var magazine = document.getElementById('repModuleDisplay__ctl3_chkCats_0'); When the page renders in my UAT environment, the HTML looks like this, and everything works OK. <input id="repModuleDisplay__ctl3_chkCats_0" type="checkbox" name="repModuleDisplay:_ctl3:chkCats:0" ... etc However, when I put it on my Production environment, the HTML is suddenly rending like this: <input id="repModuleDisplay_ctl03_chkCats_0" type="checkbox" name="repModuleDisplay$ctl03$chkCats$0" ... etc The difference in ids means that the JavaScript can't find the Element, and fails. In an ideal world, I'd scrap the buggy JavaScript and do it again properly, but for a quick fix, I'd like to know what is causing the difference in rendering between the two environments. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Neil

    Read the article

  • .NET Forms Abstraction for WPF, Silverlight, Winforms, WebForms, etc...

    - by tyndall
    Anyone know of a project(s) that seek to abstract form definitions on level higher than WPF, Silverlight, Winforms, WebForms, etc... I'm working on a project where we are fixing up 16 somewhat simple WebForms. But we may convert (and probably will convert to WPF or Silverlight 3 to 4 months from now. I'd rather define these forms once and be done with it. I'm willing to write a small DSL to help define forms, subforms, validation, links, and popups. I'm only looking to solve this for 80% or 90% of the forms. Four are very complicated and I'm willing to hand code these. I guess I'm looking for something like what XUL had hoped to be.

    Read the article

  • how to turn off percentage sign in .net/wpf?

    - by Vitalik
    I would like my WPF application to display all percentages without % sign. For example 20% would be displayed as "20" but i still want to use the standard formatting for percentages (so i get the benefit of string formatter to multiply it by 100 for me) in other words, how do i get string.Format("0.00%", 0.2) to output "20" but not "20%"? Is it possible to globally define PercentSymbol as empty string for the entire application? In particular i am using ContentStringFormat in my WPF application to format the numbers and percentages. Maybe i can do it directly in WPF.

    Read the article

  • Best way to check for string in comma-delimited list with .NET?

    - by Jeremy Stein
    I'm reading a comma-delimited list of strings from a config file. I need to check whether another string is in that list. For example: "apple,banana,cheese" If I check for "apple" I should find it, but if I check for "app" I should not. What's the most straight-forward and concise way to do this? It doesn't have to be fast. (I'll add my solution as an answer, but I'm hoping someone has something better.)

    Read the article

  • Telerik ASP.NET MVC2 Grid Delete Function with compound key.

    - by Dani
    I have a grid with a compound key: OrderId, ItemID. When I update the grid - the public ActionResult UpdateItemGridAjax(int OrderID, string ItemID) Gets both values from the grid. When I delete a row I get only the first one: public ActionResult DeleteItemGridAjax(int OrderID, string ItemID) Why is it happens and how can I get the ItemId value of the deleted row ? Grid Definition: <%= Html.Telerik().Grid<ItemsInOrderPOCO>() .Name("ItemsInOrderGrid") .DataKeys(dataKeys => { dataKeys.Add(e => e.OrderID); dataKeys.Add(e => e.ItemID); }) .ToolBar(commands => commands.Insert()) .DataBinding(dataBinding => { dataBinding.Ajax() //Ajax binding .Select("SelectItemGridAjax", "Orders", new { OrderID = Model.myOrder.OrderID }) .Insert("InsertItemGridAjax", "Orders", new { OrderID = Model.myOrder.OrderID }) .Update("UpdateItemGridAjax", "Orders") .Delete("DeleteItemGridAjax", "Orders"); }) .Columns(c => { c.Bound(o => o.ItemID); c.Bound(o => o.OrderID).Column.Visible = false; c.Bound(o => o.ItemDescription); c.Bound(o => o.NumOfItems); c.Bound(o => o.CostOfItem); c.Bound(o => o.TotalCost); c.Bound(o => o.SupplyDate); c.Command(commands => { commands.Edit(); commands.Delete(); }).Width(180).Title("Upadte"); })

    Read the article

  • ASP.Net MVC 2 is it possible to get the same instance of model(with slight changes) in HttpPost meth

    - by jjjjj
    Hi I have a complex entity User: public class User : BaseEntity { public virtual Taxi Taxi { get; set; } --> That is why i call it "complex" public virtual string Login { get; set; } public virtual string Password { get; set; } } where Taxi is a parent of User (Taxi has-many Users): public class Taxi : BaseEntity { public virtual string Name { get; set; } public virtual string ClientIp { get; set; } } BaseEntity consists of public virtual int Id { get; private set; } The problem occurs while trying to edit User [Authorize] public ActionResult ChangeAccountInfo() { var user = UserRepository.GetUser(User.Identity.Name); return View(user); } My ChangeAccountInfo.aspx <fieldset> <legend>Fields</legend> <% %> <div class="editor-label"> <%: Html.LabelFor(model => model.Login) %> </div> <div class="editor-field"> <%: Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.Login) %> <%: Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.Login) %> </div> <div class="editor-label"> <%: Html.LabelFor(model => model.Password) %> </div> <div class="editor-field"> <%: Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.Password) %> <%: Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.Password) %> </div> <div class="editor-field"> <%: Html.HiddenFor(model => model.Taxi.Name)%> </div> <p> <input type="submit" value="Save" /> </p> </fieldset> Post changes: [Authorize] [HttpPost] public ActionResult ChangeAccountInfo(User model) { if (ModelState.IsValid) { UserRepository.UpdateUser(model); return RedirectToAction("ChangeAccountInfoSuccess", "Account"); } return View(model); } But, the (User model) parameter has User.Id == 0 -- User entity had 5 before edit User.Login == "my new login" User.Password == "my new password" User.Taxi.Id == 0 -- User.Taxi entity had 3 before edit User.Taxi.Name == "old hidden name" User.Taxi.ClientIp == null -- User entity had 192.168.0.1 before edit Q: Is it possible not to mark all the fields of an entity (that should be in my UpdateUser) with tag "hidden" but still have them unchanged in my HttpPost method? e.g. not User.Taxi.ClientIp = null, but User.Taxi.ClientIp = 192.168.0.1 I'm using nhibernate, if it matters.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669  | Next Page >