Search Results

Search found 30511 results on 1221 pages for 'javascript events'.

Page 671/1221 | < Previous Page | 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678  | Next Page >

  • ExtJS panel does not render properly unless I open Firebug - WTF?

    - by Huuuze
    I have the following ExtJS Panel embedded in another Panel, which then resides in a TabPanel and the TabPanel is in a FormPanel. With that being said, these start/end date fields are initially displayed in very small cells -- the cells are so small that I see horizontal scroll bars. Now here's the weird part: if I open Firebug, everything pops into place. Does anyone know what's going on? Why isn't it rendering properly in the first place and why does Firebug cause everything to work properly simply by opening Firebug? var dateFields = new Ext.Panel({ id: 'dateFields', labelAlign: 'bottom', border: false, items: [{ layout: 'column', defaults: { columnWidth: 0.5 }, items: [{ layout: 'form', border: false, items: [{ xtype: 'datefield', name: 'start_date', fieldLabel: 'Start Date' }] }, { layout: 'form', border: false, items: [{ xtype: 'datefield', name: 'end_date', fieldLabel: 'End Date' }] }] }] });

    Read the article

  • problems piping in node.js

    - by alvaizq
    We have the following example in node.js var http = require('http'); http.createServer(function(request, response) { var proxy = http.createClient(8083, '127.0.0.1') var proxy_request = proxy.request(request.method, request.url, request.headers); proxy_request.on('response', function (proxy_response) { proxy_response.pipe(response); response.writeHead(proxy_response.statusCode, proxy_response.headers); }); setTimeout(function(){ request.pipe(proxy_request); },3000); }).listen(8081, '127.0.0.1'); The example listen to a request in 127.0.0.1:8081 and sends it to a dummy server (always return 200 OK status code) in 127.0.0.1:8083. The problem is in the pipe among the input stream (readable) and output stream (writable) when we have a async module before (in this case the setTimeOut timing). The pipe doesn't work and nothing is sent to dummy server in 8083 port. Maybe, when we have a async call (in this case the setTimeOut) before the pipe call, the inputstream change to a state "not readable", and after the async call the pipe doesn't send anything. This is just an example...we test it with more async modules from node.js community with the same result (ldapjs, etc)... We try to fix it with: - request.readable =true; //before pipe call - request.pipe(proxy_request, {end : false}); with the same result (the pipe doesn't work). Can anybody help us? Many thanks in advanced and best regards,

    Read the article

  • how to show jquery notify bar on submit using php or zend?

    - by user1400
    hi guys in my application on zend framework i use of 'jQuery Notify Bar' plugin for display messages, i'd like to show message when my form submit ,the other page is opened and notify bar be open until the other page is completely load and even some second more but the problem is that notify bar show for short Moment and when the other page begin to load , notify bar is closed, and the delay property is not effect to that $('#myForm').submit(function(){ $.notifyBar({ html: "Thank you, your settings were updated!", **delay: 20000,** animationSpeed: "normal" }); how to show notify bar in the other page too? thanks

    Read the article

  • Loading jQuery multiple times in the same page

    - by Winaji
    I'm implementing a plug-in that's embeddable in different sites (a la Meebo, Wibiya), and I want to use jQuery. Problem is, the site I'm embedding to, may already have a jQuery script loaded. The question is, what's the best approach for this kind of problem: Should I just check if jQuery is already loaded and if so, use the original site's jQuery, otherwise load it myself? If I use this approach, am I not risking comaptibility problems (i.e. the site uses an old version of jQuery)? Should I load jQuery myself (whether it's already loaded or not) and call "jQuery.noConflict(true)" when it's finished loading? If so, how can I make sure that my jQuery has finished loading (hooking to the onLoad event doesn't seem to work all the time, and polling for "jQuery" won't work for obvious reasons)? Should I do something else? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • keeping track of multiple runs of the same function, part 2

    - by qwertymk
    This is related to this Anyway what I need is actually something slightly different I need some way of doing this: function run(arg) { this.ran = this.ran || false; if (!this.ran) init; /* code */ this.ran = true; } This works fine, I just want to make sure that this code works even when this in case it was called with call() or apply() Check this out for what I'm talking about, All of the calls after the first one should all be true, no matter the context

    Read the article

  • How to get final destination URL from AJAX?

    - by Maurice Lam
    When I do an XMLHttpRequest, I always get redirected automatically to the URL (presumably by the headers of the response). For example, if I query "http://www.stackoverflow.com" I will be redirected to "http://stackoverflow.com". How can I get that final URL? (http://stackoverflow.com/ in the example) I checked in the response headers but I cannot seem to find it. (I just used the GET/POST method not HEAD).

    Read the article

  • How to click TinyMCE toolbar's button programmatically ?

    - by hongkildong
    I want to make preview button as usual form button next to submit button(as it made in most cases of "Post new topic" forms). How can I programmatically simulate toolbar's preview button click ? I tried $('#article_body_preview').click() but it didn't work. (I use jQuery lib and #article_body_preview is toolbar's preview button element )

    Read the article

  • Forced to use too many hidden fields; looking for an alternative approach

    - by harisri786
    I am looking for a better approach to do this. I have around 70 to 80 hidden fields in my page. This hidden fields are initialized at the server side and then used at the client side for validations, calculations, etc,. using java script. I wanted to know if there is any other alternative approach to using hidden fields in asp.net. I guess, these many hidden fields are increasing the page size and hence affecting the performance of my web page and I want to do away with it. FYI: I am working on an asp.net web application.

    Read the article

  • Retrieivng coordinates in this page

    - by hao
    Hey guys, Im trying to do some data mining and analyze data based on locations. For this site, http://www.dianping.com/shop/1898365 I am trying to figure out whats the latitude and longitude by crawling. But I cant seem to figure out where this information is stored. Can someone give me some pointers

    Read the article

  • Check checkbox checked property using jQuery

    - by Prasad
    I need to check the checked property of a checkbox and perform an action based on the checked property using jQuery. For example, if the age checkbox is checked, then I need to show a textbox to enter age, else hide the textbox. But the following code returns false by default: if($('#isAgeSelected').attr('checked')) { $("#txtAge").show(); } else { $("#txtAge").hide(); } How do I successfully query the checked property?

    Read the article

  • hide inputs value when input is hidden

    - by toingbou
    Hello, im using this function to hide some inputs from a form when a value selected in select tag. this is the function: function showEntry(obj,optionValue){ //hide all entry selections onchange document.getElementById("group1").style.display="none"; document.getElementById("group2").style.display="none"; if(obj.value=="group1") { document.getElementById('group1').style.display="inline"; } else if(obj.value=="group2") { document.getElementById('group2').style.display="inline"; } } and this is the form: <select class="textinput" name="function_title" onchange="showEntry(this,this.value);"> <option value=""> </option> <option value="group1" >group1</option> <option value="group2" >group2</option> </select> <span id="group1" style="display:none;"> <input class="textinput" type="text" id="input1" name="input1" value="100"/> <input class="textinput" type="text" id="input2" name="input2" value="50"/> </span> <span id="group2" style="display:none;"> <input class="textinput" type="text" id="input3" name="input3" value="60"/> <input class="textinput" type="text" id="input4" name="input4" value="45"/> </span> All i want is to hide the hidden inputs value when this group of inputs are hidden. Something like that: <input class="textinput" type="text" id="input3" name="input3" value="if(obj.value!="group2") { print(60); }"/> Is that right?

    Read the article

  • How can I use innerHTML without delete the before innerHTML?

    - by Mikelon85
    I want to convert an Array to a HTML table, but innerHTML deletes it writes before. Here is the code: <html><div id="tablaP"></div> function cargar2() { document.getElementById('tablaP').innerHTML= "<table>" var h=1 for (i=0;i<miArray.length;i++){ document.getElementById('tablaP').innerHTML = '<tr>' for (j=0;j<miArray[i].length;j++){ document.getElementById("tablaP").innerHTML = '<td><td>' } document.getElementById('tablaP').innerHTML = '</tr>' h++ } document.getElementById('tablaP').innerHTML = '</table>' }

    Read the article

  • Image visualization with canvas. How to resize them?

    - by Luca Matteis
    I'm building a website photo gallery for a friend. Images are loaded as simple DOM image objects (<img src="" />), and the size of these images is based on the browser size. So I resize them with CSS. This isn't an optimal solution since CSS resizing seems to change the quality of the image and pixelate it quite a bit. I was thinking of rendering the image with canvas and then resize it with that so that the quality remains effective, but I can't find any info about this online. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Adobe AIR canvas dimensions messed up

    - by Nikhil
    I'm messing about with Canvas in Adobe Air. But their seems to be some issue with the mouse coordinates. The more I click towards the right, the difference between the draw position and actual click increases. My code is Wb.canvas.fillRect(evt.clientX-canvasTag.clientX, evt.clientY-canvasTag.clientY, 50, 50);

    Read the article

  • jQuery infinite loop w/ tablesorter

    - by Wells
    Got myself in a funny situation: page has three tables. Using sortEnd, any time you sort one table, it sorts the other three. However, since I bound sortEnd to the function that does the sorting, you get a infinite loop of sorting/resorting. It looks like: $("table.tablesorter").tablesorter({widgets: ['zebra']}).bind("sortEnd", function() { $(this).find("th.headerSortDown,.headerSortUp").each(function(i) { index = $(this).attr("cellIndex"); order = ($(this).is(".headerSortDown")) ? 1 : 0; $("table.tablesorter").tablesorter({sortList: [[index,order]]}); }); }); Any tips on how to clean this up?

    Read the article

  • transition background-image/css change on hover?

    - by John Isaacks
    I have a thumb nail inside another div, when the thumbnail is hovered I want the parent div to fade/transition to the background of the thumbnail, then fade back to the original image after hover. I have this so far which changes the parent background to that of the thumbnail and back but with no transition. $(document).ready(function() { var originalBG; var hoverBG; $(".alt-img").hover( function () { originalBG = $(this).parent().css('backgroundImage'); hoverBG = $(this).css('backgroundImage'); $(this).parent().css('backgroundImage',hoverBG); }, function () { $(this).parent().css('backgroundImage',originalBG); } ); });

    Read the article

  • Why aren't my JQuery .ajax requests being made in parallel?

    - by Ryan Olson
    I am trying to make two ajax requests in parallel using jQuery like this: var sources = ["source1", "source2"]; $(sources).each(function() { var source = this; $.ajax({ async: true, type: "POST", data: {post: "data", in: "here"}, url: "/my/url/" + source, success: function(data) { process_result(data); } }); }); I got the basic structure from this question, but my requests still aren't being made in parallel. "source1" takes a while to complete, and I can see on the server that the second request isn't made until the first is completed. As far as I can tell, I don't have any other active requests, so I don't think it's a problem with the maximum number of parallel requests for the browser. Am I missing something else here?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678  | Next Page >