Search Results

Search found 28985 results on 1160 pages for 'sql training'.

Page 672/1160 | < Previous Page | 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679  | Next Page >

• How to store data with N columns

  - by iconiK

  I need a way to store an int for N columns. Basically what I have is this: Armies: ArmyID - UINT UnitCount1 - UINT UnitCount2 - UINT UnitCount3 - UINT UnitCount4 - UINT ... I can't possible add a column for each and every unit, so I need a fast way to store the number of each units in an army (you might have guesses it's for a game by now). Using XML is not an option as it will be dead slow.

  Read the article

• drop-down combo box-like functionality for queries.

  - by Frank Developer

  Is it possible to provide the following type of fuctionality with informix client tools? As the user types the first two characters of a name, the drop-down list is empty. At the third character, the list fills with just the names beginning with those three characters. At the fourth character, MS-Access completes the first matching name (assuming the combo's AutoExpand is on). Once enough characters are typed to identify the customer, the user tabs to the next field. The time taken to load the combo between keystrokes is minimal. This occurs once only for each entry, unless the user backspaces through the first three characters again. If your list still contains too many records, you can reduce them by another order of magnitude by changing the value of constant conSuburbMin from 3 to 4.

  Read the article

• Collection was modified; enumeration operation may not execute

  - by Rita

  I have the below code. I am trying to remove the record and it is throwing Exception when it is removing the Record. "Collection was modified; enumeration operation may not execute." Any ideas on how to get rid of the message. Appreciate your time. //validClaimControlNo has valid ClaimControl Numbers. List<string> validClaimControlNo = new List<string>(); int count = 0; foreach (List<Field> f in records) { foreach (Field fe in f) { if (i == 0) if (!(validClaimControlNo.Contains(fe.Value))) { //if this claim is not in the Valid list, Remove that Record records.RemoveAt(count); } i++; } i = 0; count++; }

  Read the article

• Is it bad to have a non-clustered index that contains the primary key from the clustered index?

  - by Don

  If you have a table with a clustered index on the Primary Key (int), is it redundant and bad to have one (ore more) non-clustered indexes that include that primary key column as one of the columns in the non-clustered index?

  Read the article

• sequence of events in ACCESS

  - by I__

  what is the proper way of doing the following: getting DATE as user input running a query generating a report that uses the query this is the solution i was thinking: have a form that takes user input run the query open the report what is the correct way of doing this?

  Read the article

• Should I sanitize EVERY form variable passed along?

  - by Camran

  I have a form with many fields... The action is set to a php page which queries mysql... Should I sanitize with mysql_real_escape_string every single variable? Or can I ignore sanitizing drop-lists and radios for instance? Also, besides mysql_real_escape_string, what else should I do to prevent attacks? Thanks

  Read the article

• how to optimize this query?

  - by jest

  hi! the query is: select employee_id, last_name, salary, round((salary+(salary*0.15)), 0) as NewSalary, (round((salary+(salary*0.15)), 0) - salary) as “IncreaseAmount” from employees; can i optimize this round((salary+(salary*0.15)), 0) part in anyway, so that it doesn't appear twice..i tried giving it an alias but didn't work :(

  Read the article

• counting employee attendance

  - by jjj

  i am trying to write a statment for counting the employees attendance and execute thier id , name and the days that he has working on the last 3 months by counting the duplicate id on NewTimeAttendance for month 1 , 2 and 3 .. i tried to count : Select COUNT(employeeid) from NewTimeAttendance where employeeid=1 and (month=1 or month =2 or month = 3) This is absolutely working ,but just for one employee... the secound try: SELECT COUNT(NewEmployee.EmployeeID) FROM NewEmployee INNER JOIN NewTimeAttendance ON NewEmployee.EmployeeID = NewTimeAttendance.EmployeeID and (month=1 or month =2 or month = 3) This is working , but it counts all employees .. and i want it to execute each EmployeeId, EmployeeName and number of days as new record last try: (before you see the code ... it is wrong ..but i am trying) for i in 0..27 loop SELECT COUNT(NewEmployee.EmployeeID),NewEmployee.EmployeeId,EmployeeName FROM NewEmployee INNER JOIN NewTimeAttendance ON NewEmployee.EmployeeID(i) = NewTimeAttendance.EmployeeID and (month=1 or month =2 or month = 3) end loop i realy need help...thanks in advance

  Read the article

• How can I bind an Enum to a DbType of bit or int?

  - by uriDium

  Hi I am using Linq2Sql and want to bind an objects field (which is enum) to either a bit or a int type in the database. For example I want have a gender field in my model. I have already edited the DBML and changed the Type to point to my enum. I want to create Radio buttons (which I think I have figured out) for gender and dropdown lists for other areas using the same idea. My enum looks like this public enum Gender { Male, Female } Mapping between DbType 'int' and Type 'Project.Models.Gender' in Column 'Gender' of Type 'Candidate' is not supported. Any ideas on how to do this mapping. Am I missing something on the enums.

  Read the article

• MSSQL Sum query

  - by ldb

  today my problem is this i have 2 column and i wish check if the sum of that columns isn't Higher then a value(485 for example) and if is do a query...i though to do SELECT * FROM table WHERE ColumnA+ColumnB<485 But isn't working... i've already tried with SELECT Sum(ColumnA)+Sum(ColumnB) AS Total FROM table but it gives me 1 column with the sum of all rows, i instead want a row for every sum. so how can i do..? xD i hope you understood if not just ask that i try to explain it better! and thanks in advice for who want to help me! EDIT: I Found out XD the problem was that the columns was Smallint and the result of 1 or more rows was more than 32k so it wasn't working! Thanks At all!!

  Read the article

• select distinct col1 with min(col2) and max(col3) from table

  - by user338804

  My table looks like this with duplicates in col1 col1, col2, col3, col4 1, 1, 0, a 1, 2, 1, a 1, 3, 1, a 2, 4, 1, b 3, 5, 0, c I want to select distinct col1 with max (col3) and min(col2); so result set will be: col1, col2, col3, col4 1, 2, 1, a 2, 4, 1, b 3, 5, 0, c I have a solution but looking for best ideas?

  Read the article

• Update table with if statement PS/SQL

  - by Matt

  I am trying to do something like this but am having trouble putting it into oracle coding. BEGIN IF ((SELECT complete_date FROM task_table WHERE task_id = 1) IS NULL) THEN UPDATE task_table SET complete_date = //somedate WHERE task_id = 1; ELSE UPDATE task_table SET complete_date = NULL; END IF; END; But this does not work i also tried IF EXISTS(SELECT complete_date FROM task_table WHERE task_id = 1) with no luck

  Read the article

• Relating text fields to check boxes in Java

  - by Finzz

  This program requires the user to login and request a database to access. The program then gets a connection object, searches through the database storing the column names into a vector for later use. The problem comes with implementing text fields to allow the user to search for specific values within the database. I can get the check boxes and text fields to appear using a gridlayout and add them to a panel. How do I relate the text fields to their appropriate check box? I've tried adding them to a vector, but then they can't also be added to the panel as well. I've searched for a way to name the text fields as the loop cycles through the column names, but it seems impossible to do without having them declared ahead of time. This can't be done either, as it's impossible to determine the attributes that the user will request. I just need to be able to know the names of the text fields so I can test to see if the user entered information and perform the necessary logic. Let me know if you have to see the rest of the code to give an answer, but hopefully you get the general idea of what I'm trying to accomplish. Picture of UI: try { ResultSet r2 = con.getMetaData().getColumns("", "", rb.getText(), ""); colNames1 = new Vector<String>(); columns1 = new Vector<JCheckBox>(); while (r2.next()) { colNames1.add(r2.getString(4)); JCheckBox cb = new JCheckBox(r2.getString(4)); JTextField tf = new JTextField(10); columns1.add(cb); p3.add(cb); p3.add(tf); } }

  Read the article

• MySQL - Where - search string - MATCH.

  - by Jamie

  Hi guys, Quick question. I'm in a bit of a rush but if someone could quickly point me in the right direction I would be very very happy. I have a field in the db, let's call it field_a which returns a string in the format "20,50,60,80" etc. I wish to do a query which will search in this field to see if 20 exists. Could I use MySQL MATCH or is there a better way? Thank you!

  Read the article

• getting complete sql query in jython

  - by kdev

  result=sqlstring.executeQuery("select distinct table_name,owner from all_tables ") rs.append(str(i)+' , '+result.getString("table_name")+' , '+result.getString("owner")) If i want to display the query select * from all_tables or ' select count(*) from all_tables' how can i get the output to display . Please suggest thanks

  Read the article

• Change update value of property (LINQTOSQL)

  - by Dynde

  Hi... I've got an entity object - Customer, with a property called VATRate. This VATRate is in the form of a decimal (0.25). I wanted to be able to enter a percentage value, and save it in the correct decimal value in the database, so I made this custom property: partial class Customer{ public decimal VatPercent { get{ ... //Get code works fine} set { this.VATRate = (value / 100); } } } And then I just bind this property instead of VATRate in my ASPX editTemplate (formview). This actually works - at least one time, when I debug an update, the value is set correctly one time, and then right after it gets set to the old value. I can't really see why it sets the value twice (and with the old value the second time). Can anyone shed some light on this?

  Read the article

• SSAS OLAP MDX and relationships

  - by Sonic Soul

  I new to OLAP, and still not sure how to create a relationship between 2 or more entities. I am basing my cube on views. For simplicity sake let's call them like this: viewParent (ParentID PK) viewChild (ChildID PK, ParentID FK) these views have more fields, but they're not important for this question. in my data source, i defined a relationship between viewParent and viewChild using ParentID for the link. As for measures, i was forced to create separate measures for Parent and Child. in my MDX query however, the relationship does not seem to be enforced. If i select record count for parent, child, and add some filters for the parent, the child count is not reflecting it.. SELECT { [Measures].[ParentCount],[Measures].[ChildCount] } ON COLUMNS FROM [Cube] WHERE { ( {[Time].[Month].&[2011-06-01T00:00:00]} ,{[SomeDimension].&[Foo]} ) } the selected ParentCount is correct, but ChildCount is not affected by any of the filters (because they are parent filters). However, since i defined a relationship, how can i take advantage of that to filter children by parent filter?

  Read the article

• How can I use an array within a SQL query

  - by ThinkingInBits

  So I'm trying to take a search string (could be any number of words) and turn each value into a list to use in the following IN statement) in addition, I need a count of all these values to use with my having count filter $search_array = explode(" ",$this->search_string); $tag_count = count($search_array); $db = Connect::connect(); $query = "select p.id from photographs p left join photograph_tags c on p.id = c.photograph_id and c.value IN ($search_array) group by p.id having count(c.value) >= $tag_count"; This currently returns no results, any ideas?

  Read the article

• Specify sorting order for a GROUP BY query to retrieve oldest or newest record for each group

  - by Beau Simensen

  I need to get the most recent record for each device from an upgrade request log table. A device is unique based on a combination of its hardware ID and its MAC address. I have been attempting to do this with GROUP BY but I am not convinced this is safe since it looks like it may be simply returning the "top record" (whatever SQLite or MySQL thinks that is). I had hoped that this "top record" could be hinted at by way of ORDER BY but that does not seem to be having any impact as both of the following queries returns the same records for each device, just in opposite order: SELECT extHwId, mac, created FROM upgradeRequest GROUP BY extHwId, mac ORDER BY created DESC SELECT extHwId, mac, created FROM upgradeRequest GROUP BY extHwId, mac ORDER BY created ASC Is there another way to accomplish this? I've seen several somewhat related posts that have all involved sub selects. If possible, I would like to do this without subselects as I would like to learn how to do this without that.

  Read the article

• Specify fields in a recursive find with cakephp

  - by Razor Storm

  Suppose I have a table Recipe that hasmany ingredients. I do a recursive find to grab recipes with their associated ingredients: $this->Recipe->find('all', array('fields' => array('id','title','description'))); Here I can use the 'fields' attribute to specify that I only want it to return id, title, and description. However, despite this, cakephp still returns ALL columns from the ingredients table. How do I tell cakephp that I only want ingredient table's id and name fields? btw ingredient model is "Ingredient" and the table is ingredients, and the aggregation table is recipes_ingredients.

  Read the article

• Access is refusing to run an query with linked table?

  - by Mahmoud

  Hey all i have 3 tables each as follow cash_credit Bank_Name-------in_date-------Com_Id---Amount America Bank 15/05/2010 1 200 HSBC 17/05/2010 3 500 Cheque_credit Bank_Name-----Cheque_Number-----in_date-------Com_Id---Amount America Bank 74835435-5435 15/05/2010 2 600 HSBC 41415454-2851 17/05/2010 5 100 Companies com_id----Com_Name 1 Ebay 2 Google 3 Facebook 4 Amazon Companies table is a linked table when i tried to create an query as follow SELECT cash_credit.Amount, Companies.Com_Name, cheque_credit.Amount FROM cheque_credit INNER JOIN (cash_credit INNER JOIN Companies ON cash_credit.com_id = Companies.com_id) ON cheque_credit.com_id = Companies.com_id; I get an error saying that my inner Join is incorrectly, this query was created using Access 2007 query design the error is Type mismatch in expression then i thought it might be the inner join so i tried Left Join and i get an error that this method is not used JOIN expression is not supported I am confused on where is the problem that is causing all this

  Read the article

• how do I integrate the aspnet_users table that comes with asp.net membership into my existing databa

  - by ooo

  i have a database that already has a users table COLUMNS: userID - int loginName - string First - string Last - string i just installed the asp.net membership table. Right now all of my tables are joined into my users table foreign keyed into the "userId" field How do i integrate asp.net_users table into my schema? here are the ideas i thought of: Add a membership_id field to my users table and on new inserts, include that new field in my users table. This seems like the cleanest way as i dont need to break any existing relationships. break all existing relationship and move all of the fields in my user table into the asp.net_users table. This seems like a pain but ultimately will lead to the most simple, normalized solution any thoughts?

  Read the article

• how do I integrate the aspnet_users table (asp.net membership) into my existing database

  - by ooo

  i have a database that already has a users table COLUMNS: userID - int loginName - string First - string Last - string i just installed the asp.net membership table. Right now all of my tables are joined into my users table foreign keyed into the "userId" field How do i integrate asp.net_users table into my schema? here are the ideas i thought of: Add a membership_id field to my users table and on new inserts, include that new field in my users table. This seems like the cleanest way as i dont need to break any existing relationships. break all existing relationship and move all of the fields in my user table into the asp.net_users table. This seems like a pain but ultimately will lead to the most simple, normalized solution any thoughts?

  Read the article

• Login faild for user 'SOFTWARE\Soft'

  - by Noro

  Cannot open database "SystematicDBSearch" requested by the login.Login faild for user 'SOFTWARE\Soft'.Where is a problem.

  Read the article

• Select rows where column LIKE dictionary word

  - by Gerve

  I have 2 tables: Dictionary - Contains roughly 36,000 words CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `dictionary` ( `word` varchar(255) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`word`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1; Datas - Contains roughly 100,000 rows CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `datas` ( `ID` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `hash` varchar(32) NOT NULL, `data` varchar(255) NOT NULL, `length` int(11) NOT NULL, `time` int(11) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`ID`), UNIQUE KEY `hash` (`hash`), KEY `data` (`data`), KEY `length` (`length`), KEY `time` (`time`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=105316 ; I would like to somehow select all the rows from datas where the column data contains 1 or more words. I understand this is a big ask, it would need to match all of these rows together in every combination possible, so it needs the best optimization. I have tried the below query, but it just hangs for ages: SELECT `datas`.*, `dictionary`.`word` FROM `datas`, `dictionary` WHERE `datas`.`data` LIKE CONCAT('%', `dictionary`.`word`, '%') AND LENGTH(`dictionary`.`word`) > 3 ORDER BY `length` ASC LIMIT 15 I have also tried something similar to the above with a left join, and on clause that specified the like statement.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679  | Next Page >