Search Results

Search found 56084 results on 2244 pages for 'net controls'.

Page 673/2244 | < Previous Page | 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680  | Next Page >

  • How would you validate a checkbox in ASP.Net MVC 2?

    - by Scott Mayfield
    Using MVC2, I have a simple ViewModel that contains a bool field that is rendered on the view as a checkbox. I would like to validate that the user checked the box. The [Required] attribute on my ViewModel doesn't seem to do the trick. I believe this is because the unchecked checkbox form field is not actually transmitted back during the POST, and therefore the validation doesn't run on it. Is there a standard way to handle checkbox "required" validation in MVC2? or do I have to write a custom validator for it? I suspect the custom validator won't get executed either for the reason mentioned above. Am I stuck checking for it explicitly in my controller? That seems messy... Any guidance would be appreciated. Scott

    Read the article

  • Asp.Net MVC Data Annotations. How to get client side validation on 2 properties being equal

    - by Mark
    How do you get client side validation on two properties such as the classic password confirm password scenario. I'm using a metadata class based on EF mapping to my DB table, heres the code. The commented out attributes on my class will get me server side validation but not client side. [MetadataType(typeof(MemberMD))] public partial class Member { //[CustomValidation(typeof(MemberMD), "Verify", ErrorMessage = "The password and confirmation password did not match.")] //[PropertiesMustMatch("Password", "ConfirmPassword", ErrorMessage = "The password and confirmation password did not match.")] public class MemberMD { [Required(ErrorMessage = "Name is required.")] [StringLength(50, ErrorMessage = "No more than 50 characters")] public object Name { get; set; } [Required(ErrorMessage = "Email is required.")] [StringLength(50, ErrorMessage = "No more than 50 characters.")] [RegularExpression(".+\\@.+\\..+", ErrorMessage = "Valid email required e.g. [email protected]")] public object Email { get; set; } [Required(ErrorMessage = "Password is required.")] [StringLength(30, ErrorMessage = "No more than 30 characters.")] [RegularExpression("[\\S]{6,}", ErrorMessage = "Must be at least 6 characters.")] public object Password { get; set; } [Required] public object ConfirmPassword { get; set; } [Range(0, 150), Required] public object Age { get; set; } [Required(ErrorMessage = "Postcode is required.")] [RegularExpression(@"^[a-zA-Z0-9 ]{1,10}$", ErrorMessage = "Postcode must be alphanumeric and no more than 10 characters in length")] public object Postcode { get; set; } [DisplayName("Security Question")] [Required] public object SecurityQuestion { get; set; } [DisplayName("Security Answer")] [Required] [StringLength(50, ErrorMessage = "No more than 50 characters.")] public object SecurityAnswer { get; set; } public static ValidationResult Verify(MemberMD t) { if (t.Password == t.ConfirmPassword) return ValidationResult.Success; else return new ValidationResult(""); } } Any help would be greatly appreciated, as I have only been doing this 5 months please try not to blow my mind.

    Read the article

  • Receiving "Path 'OPTIONS' is forbidden." Exception in ASP.NET website

    - by Greg
    I am getting the error "Path 'OPTIONS' is forbidden." since we moved our website over to a new server setup. I am unable to recreate the error but I am receiving emails for this exception at least a few times a day. Any ideas what could be causing this and how I can fix it? EDIT: Stack Trace: at System.Web.HttpMethodNotAllowedHandler.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context) at System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) There are no directories or files named OPTIONS and I believe all permissions are correct. I am finding some information about a possible link to EXCEL getting data from the webserver, but nothing that full explains how or what is happening yet. EDIT AGAIN: Seems this has to do with Excel files opening in Internet Explorer..

    Read the article

  • MVC2 DataAnnotations validation with inheritance

    - by bhiku
    Hi, I have a .NET 2.0 class the properties of which are marked virtual.I need to use the class as a model in a MVC2 application. So, I have created a .NET 3.5 class inheriting from the .NET 2.0 class and added the DataAnnotations attributes to the overriden properties in the new class. A snippet of what I have done is below // .NET 2.0 class public class Customer { private string _firstName = ""; public virtual string FirstName { get { return _firstName; } set { _firstName = value; } } } // .NET 3.5 class public class MVCCustomer : Customer { [Required(ErrorMessage="Firstname is required")] public override string FirstName { get { return base.FirstName; } set { base.FirstName = value; } } } I have used the class as the model for a MVC2 view using the HtmlFor helpers. Serverside validation works correctly but the client side validation does not. Specifically the validation error is not displayed on the page. What am I missing, or is it only possible to do this using buddy classes. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to change stack size for a .NET program?

    - by carter-boater
    I have a program that does recursive calls for 2 billion times and the stack overflow. I make changes, and then it still need 40K resursive calls. So I need probably serveral MB stack memory. I heard the stack size is default to 1MB. I tried search online. Some one said to go properties -linker .........in visual studio, but I cannot find it. Does anybody knows how to increase it? Also I am wondering if I can set it somewhere in my C# program? P.S. I am using 32-bit winXP and 64bit win7.

    Read the article

  • .NET HttpListener - no traffic when listening to "https://*.8080" when browser proxy is set???

    - by Greg
    Hi, Background - I can get HttpListener working fine for HTTP traffic. I'm having trouble with HTTPS traffic however. QUESTION: How can I change the code below so that a browser request to a "https" URL will actually be picked up by my HttpListener? Notes - At the moment with firefox's proxy settings set to "localhost:8080", when I listen to traffic on port 8080 ("https://*:8080/"), and I enter a HTTPS url in firefox, I am getting no traffic being picked up? (when I listen to just http and enter normal http url's it works fine) _httpListener = new HttpListener(); _httpListener.Prefixes.Add("https://*:8080/"); _httpListener.Start(); thanks

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC - using model property as form, how can I post to action?

    - by Ryan Peters
    Consider the following model: public class BandProfileModel { public BandModel Band { get; set; } public IEnumerable<Relationship> Requests { get; set; } } and the following form: <% using (Html.BeginForm()) { %> <%: Html.EditorFor(m => m.Band) %> <input type="submit" value="Save Band" /> <% } %> which posts to the following action: public ActionResult EditPost(BandProfileModel m, string band) { // stuff is done here, but m is null? return View(m); } Basically, I only have one property on my model that is used in the form. The other property in BandProfleModel is just used in the UI for other data. I'm trying to update just the Band property, but for each post, the argument "m" is always null (specifically, the .Band property is null). It's posting just fine to the action, so it isn't a problem with my route. Just the data is null. The ID and name attributes of the fields are BAND_whatever and Band.whatever (whatever being a property of Band), so it seems like it would work... What am I doing wrong? How can I use just one property as part of a form, post back, and have values populated via the model binder for my BandProfileModel property in the action? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to Add, Edit and Display one to many relationship entities in ASP.Net MVC 2?

    - by Picflight
    I am looking for best practices conforming to the MVC design pattern. My Entities have the following relationship. tblPortal PortalId PrortalName tblPortalAlias AliasId PortalId HttpAlias Each Portal can have many PortalAlias. I want to Add a New Portal and then Add the associated PortalAlias. I am confused on how I should structure the Views and how I should present the Views to the user. I am looking for some sample code on how to accomplish this. My thoughts are first present the Portal View, let the user add the Portal. Then click the Edit link on the Portal List View and on the Portal Edit View let them Add the PortalAlias. If so, what should the Edit View look like? So far I have: Edit <%@ Page Title="" Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Views/Shared/Site.Master" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<MyProject.Mvc.Models.PortalFormViewModel>" %> <asp:Content ID="Content1" ContentPlaceHolderID="TitleContent" runat="server"> Edit </asp:Content> <asp:Content ID="Content2" ContentPlaceHolderID="MainContent" runat="server"> <h2>Edit</h2> <% Html.RenderPartial("PortalForm", Model); %> <div> <%= Html.ActionLink("Back to List", "Index") %> </div> </asp:Content> PortalForm <%@ Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<MyProject.Mvc.Models.PortalFormViewModel>" %> <%= Html.ValidationSummary("Please correct the errors and try again.") %> <% using (Html.BeginForm()) {%> <%= Html.ValidationSummary(true) %> <fieldset> <legend>Fields</legend> <div class="editor-label"> <%= Html.LabelFor(model => model.Portal.PortalId) %> </div> <div class="editor-field"> <%= Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.Portal.PortalId) %> <%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.Portal.PortalId) %> </div> <div class="editor-label"> <%= Html.LabelFor(model => model.Portal.PortalName) %> </div> <div class="editor-field"> <%= Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.Portal.PortalName) %> <%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.Portal.PortalName) %> </div> <p> <input type="submit" value="Save" /> </p> </fieldset> <% } %> Alias<br /><%-- This display is for debug --%> <% foreach (var item in Model.PortalAlias) { %> <%= item.HTTPAlias %><br /> <% } %> PortalFormViewModel public class PortalFormViewModel { public Portal Portal { get; private set; } public IEnumerable<PortalAlias> PortalAlias { get; private set; } public PortalFormViewModel() { Portal = new Portal(); } public PortalFormViewModel(Portal portal) { Portal = portal; PortalAlias = portal.PortalAlias; } }

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC Ajax Form: Is enctype correct? Why doesn't file get uploaded?

    - by Fabio Milheiro
    In the case that the user doesn't have Javascript activated, in order to draw a form, I begin this way: <% using (Html.BeginForm("Create", "Language", FormMethod.Post, new {enctype="multipart/form-data"})) { %> If the user has Javascript activated, the following code is used: <% using (Ajax.BeginForm("Create", "Language", new AjaxOptions { UpdateTargetId = "CommonArea" }, new { enctype = "multipart/form-data" })) { %> The problem is this: In the first case, I can get the file uploaded using the following instruction in the business layer: // Get the uploaded file HttpPostedFile Flag = HttpContext.Current.Request.Files["Flag"]; In the second case, this instruction doesn't work. How do I know upload that file using the Ajax.BeginForm? Is the code right? Can anyone more experience advise about using jQuery plug-in to upload file before the form submission? Thank you

    Read the article

  • vs2010 asp.net : Procedure or function expects parameter which was not supplied.

    - by dotnet-practitioner
    I have googled for this issue but listed solutions are not working for me... I get the following error message: Procedure or function 'ContactHide' expects parameter '@ContactID', which was not supplied. Here is my setup..What am I missing? Please help? Debugger shows that I am supplying ContactID correctly in my C# code behind code. <asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource2" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:MYDBConnectionString1 %>" UpdateCommand="ContactHide" UpdateCommandType="StoredProcedure" > int contactid= Convert.ToInt32(e.CommandArgument); SqlDataSource2.UpdateParameters.Add("@ContactID", System.Data.DbType.Int32, "1"); SqlDataSource2.UpdateParameters["@ContactID"].DefaultValue = contactid.ToString(); SqlDataSource2.Update(); ALTER PROCEDURE dbo.ContactHide @ContactID int /* ( @parameter1 int = 5, @parameter2 datatype OUTPUT ) */ AS Update Contacts set Visible = 0 where ContactID = isnull(@ContactID,-1) /* SET NOCOUNT ON */ RETURN

    Read the article

  • Recommendations on resolving a cs1705 error

    - by Scott A. Lawrence
    I'm upgrading a number of solutions from Visual Studio 2008 to Visual Studio 2010RC. In the process of doing this, I've encountered two instances of compiler error cs1705, one for System.Core and another for System.Data.Linq. In each case, an assembly compiled earlier has a reference to the .NET 4.0 version of these system assemblies, while the web project I'm trying to compile only has references to the .NET 3.5 version of them. Adding .NET 4.0 versions of System.Core and System.Data.Linq to the web project doesn't resolve the error. Removing the .NET 3.5 versions of the assemblies so that only the .NET 4.0 versions remain results in even more errors. Any recommendations on how to resolve this error would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • How to tell whether Code Access Security is allowed in library code

    - by Sander Rijken
    In .NET 4 Code Access Security (CAS) is deprecated. Whenever you call a method that implicitly uses it, it fails with a NotSupportedException, that can be resolved with a configuration switch that makes it fall back to the old behavior. We have a common library that's used in both .NET 3.5 and .NET 4, so we need to be able to tell whether or not we should use the CAS method. For example, in .NET 3.5 I should call: Assembly.Load(string, Evidence); Whereas in .NET 4 I want to call Assembly.Load(string); Calling Load(string, Evidence) throws a NotSupportedException. Of course this works, but I'd like to know if there's a better method: try { asm = Assembly.Load(someString, someEvidence); } catch(NotSupportedException) { asm = Assembly.Load(someString); }

    Read the article

  • SelectedIndexChanged for programmatically created dropdownlist in ASP.NET fires multiple times.

    - by Achilles
    Consider the following: dim dropdownlist1 as new dropdownlist dim dropdownlist2 as new dropdownlist dim dropdownlist3 as new dropdownlist dropdownlist1.AutoPostBack = true dropdownlist2.AutoPostBack = true dropdownlist3.AutoPostBack = true AddHandler dropdownlist1.SelectedIndexChanged, AddressOf SomeEvent AddHandler dropdownlist2.SelectedIndexChanged, AddressOf SomeEvent AddHandler dropdownlist3.SelectedIndexChanged, AddressOf SomeEvent The SomeEvent fires as expected when any of the dropdown's selection is changed. However if say DropdownList2 has a selection made then I make a selection with either DropDownList1 or DropdownList3, then SomeEvent fires again. What is causing this behavior and how do I get just a single raising of that event? I suspect that when the viewstate for the dynamcially created dropdownlists is restored and the selection restored, then the event is fired because technically the selected index did change when the control was recreated. The reason I suspect this is that the event fires the for each dropdownlist...

    Read the article

  • HttpHandler instance and HttpApplication object - does the latter...?

    - by SourceC
    A Book showed an example where ( when using IIS7 ) the following module was configured such that it would be used by any web application ( even by non-asp.net apps ) running on a web site. But: A) if this module is invoked for non-asp.net application, then how or why would HttpApplication object still be created, since non-asp.net apps don’t run in the context of CLR ( and thus Asp.Net runtime also won’t run )? b) Assuming HttpApplication object is also created for non-asp.net apps, why then does the code inside Init() event handler have to check for whether HttpApplication object actually exists? Why wouldn’t it exist? Isn’t this HttpApplication object which actually instantiates Http module instance? Here is Http handler: public class SimpleSqlLogging : IHttpModule { private HttpApplication _CurrentApplication; public void Dispose() { _CurrentApplication = null; } public void Init(HttpApplication context) { // Attach to the incoming request event _CurrentApplication = context; if (context != null) { context.BeginRequest += new EventHandler(context_BeginRequest); } } void context_BeginRequest(object sender, EventArgs e) { ... } }

    Read the article

  • Change the Default Application Pool in IIS7 using .net?

    - by EdenMachine
    I'm using the following function to create a IIS7 Application and/or Virtual Directory. How would I also set the Application to use a different Application Pool? Private Sub CreateVirtualDir(ByVal WebSite As String, ByVal AppName As String, ByVal Path As String, Optional ByVal IsApplication As Boolean = True, Optional ByVal RunScripts As Boolean = True, Optional ByVal IsWrite As Boolean = True) Dim IISSchema As New System.DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry("IIS://" & WebSite & "/Schema/AppIsolated") Dim CanCreate As Boolean = Not IISSchema.Properties("Syntax").Value.ToString.ToUpper() = "BOOLEAN" IISSchema.Dispose() If CanCreate Then Dim PathCreated As Boolean Try Dim IISAdmin As New System.DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry("IIS://" & WebSite & "/W3SVC/1/Root") 'make sure folder exists If Not System.IO.Directory.Exists(Path) Then System.IO.Directory.CreateDirectory(Path) PathCreated = True End If 'If the virtual directory already exists then delete it For Each VD As System.DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry In IISAdmin.Children If VD.Name = AppName Then IISAdmin.Invoke("Delete", New String() {VD.SchemaClassName, AppName}) IISAdmin.CommitChanges() Exit For End If Next VD 'Create and setup new virtual directory Dim VDir As System.DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry = IISAdmin.Children.Add(AppName, "IIsWebVirtualDir") VDir.Properties("Path").Item(0) = Path If IsApplication Then VDir.Properties("AppFriendlyName").Item(0) = AppName End If VDir.Properties("EnableDirBrowsing").Item(0) = False VDir.Properties("AccessRead").Item(0) = True VDir.Properties("AccessExecute").Item(0) = False VDir.Properties("AccessWrite").Item(0) = IsWrite VDir.Properties("AccessScript").Item(0) = RunScripts VDir.Properties("AuthNTLM").Item(0) = True VDir.Properties("EnableDefaultDoc").Item(0) = True VDir.Properties("DefaultDoc").Item(0) = "default.htm,default.aspx,default.asp" VDir.Properties("AspEnableParentPaths").Item(0) = True 'VDir.Properties("AppCreate").Item(0) = False VDir.CommitChanges() 'the following are acceptable params 'INPROC = 0 'OUTPROC = 1 'POOLED = 2 If IsApplication Then VDir.Invoke("AppCreate", 1) Else VDir.Invoke("AppCreate", False) End If Catch Ex As Exception If PathCreated Then System.IO.Directory.Delete(Path) End If 'MsgBox(Ex.Message) End Try End If End Sub

    Read the article

  • How to provide a fileDownloadName only if the user requests to save the file in ASP.NET MVC?

    - by davekaro
    I've got a controller action that returns a FileResult like this return this.File("file.pdf", "application/pdf"); for the URL "/Download/322" - where 322 is the id of the file. This works great, so that if a user clicks on a link to the PDF - it will open in their web browser as long as they have a PDF plugin installed. But, what if they right-click the link and choose "Save as..."? The browser pops up with the filename as "322." I'd like to have a better filename at this point, by doing something like this: return this.File("file.pdf", "application/pdf", "file.pdf"); But if I change the controller to return like that, then it will always pop up the download box, since MVC is setting the Content-Disposition header to attachment (so I can't embed the file). In summary, can I somehow detect that the user is trying to download the file vs. the file is just being embedded in something on the page?

    Read the article

  • Why this strange behavior of sqlbulkcopy in a asp.net website running under iis?

    - by Pandiya Chendur
    I'm using SqlClient.SqlBulkCopy to try and bulk copy a csv file into a database. I am getting the following error after calling the ..WriteToServer method. "The given value of type String from the data source cannot be converted to type bit of the specified target column." Here is my code, dt.Columns.Add("IsDeleted", typeof(byte)); dt.Columns.Add(new DataColumn("CreatedDate", typeof(DateTime))); foreach (DataRow dr in dt.Rows) { if (dr["MobileNo2"] == "" && dr["DriverName2"] == "") { dr["MobileNo2"] = null; dr["DriverName2"] = ""; } dr["IsDeleted"] = Convert.ToByte(0); dr["CreatedDate"] = Convert.ToDateTime(System.DateTime.Now.ToString()); } string connectionString = System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager. ConnectionStrings["connectionString"].ConnectionString; SqlBulkCopy sbc = new SqlBulkCopy(connectionString); sbc.DestinationTableName = "DailySchedule"; sbc.ColumnMappings.Add("WirelessId", "WirelessId"); sbc.ColumnMappings.Add("RegNo", "RegNo"); sbc.ColumnMappings.Add("DriverName1", "DriverName1"); sbc.ColumnMappings.Add("MobileNo1", "MobileNo1"); sbc.ColumnMappings.Add("DriverName2", "DriverName2"); sbc.ColumnMappings.Add("MobileNo2", "MobileNo2"); sbc.ColumnMappings.Add("IsDeleted", "IsDeleted"); sbc.ColumnMappings.Add("CreatedDate", "CreatedDate"); sbc.WriteToServer(dt); sbc.Close(); There is no error when running under visual studio developement server but it gives me an error when running under iis..... Here is my sql server table details, [Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [WirelessId] [int] NULL, [RegNo] [nvarchar](50) NULL, [DriverName1] [nvarchar](50) NULL, [MobileNo1] [numeric](18, 0) NULL, [DriverName2] [nvarchar](50) NULL, [MobileNo2] [numeric](18, 0) NULL, [IsDeleted] [tinyint] NULL, [CreatedDate] [datetime] NULL,

    Read the article

  • how to rename the boundfield of a gridview in asp.net?

    - by Akshay
    protected void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { System.Collections.ArrayList list = new System.Collections.ArrayList(); list.Add("abc"); list.Add("xyz"); list.Add("pqr"); list.Add("efg"); GridView1.DataSource = list; GridView1.DataBind(); } Now when data is bound to the gridview the column name is by default "Items" but I want to change the header text of this column. How to do this..?

    Read the article

  • How to tell wether Code Access Security is allowed in library code

    - by Sander Rijken
    in .NET 4 Code Access Security (CAS) is deprecated. Whenever you call a method that implicitly uses it, it fails with a NotSupportedException, that can be resolved with a configuration switch that makes it fall back to the old behavior. We have a common library that's used in both .NET 3.5 and .NET 4, so we need to be able to tell wether or not we should use the CAS method. For example, in .NET 3.5 I should call: Assembly.Load(string, Evidence); Whereas in .NET 4 I want to call Assembly.Load(string); Calling Load(string, Evidence) throws a NotSupportedException. Ofcourse this works, but I'd like to know if there's a better method: try { asm = Assembly.Load(someString, someEvidence); } catch(NotSupportedException) { asm = Assembly.Load(someString); }

    Read the article

  • .net question - where are the DefaultCredentials stored/accessed from for a WinForms v3.5 app?

    - by Greg
    Hi, Where are the DefaultCredentials stored/accessed from for a WinForms v3.5 app? That is if I am using the settings for defaultProxy for my Winforms v3.5 application, and set a proxy server address here, exactly where does/can the username/password come from? Or in other words where does the framework source the "default credentials" for a winforms application running on the client PC? <defaultProxy enabled="true|false" useDefaultCredentials="true|false" <bypasslist> … </bypasslist> <proxy> … </proxy> <module> … </module> /> Background - apparently ClickOnce can use this for a client side application, however I'm trying to work out where click once would get this defaultCredential from, for a user who is running the clickonce install for my winforms application.

    Read the article

  • How do you implement a combobox filter using AJAX in ASP.NET?

    - by geocine
    To save some time on discussing my problem you could check the demo below: http://demos.telerik.com/aspnet-ajax/combobox/examples/functionality/filteringcombo/defaultcs.aspx I already checked the ListBoxExtender on the Ajax Control Toolkit but it wouldn't give me fine results. What I want to do is to filter a listbox which is populated by over 3000 records from the database upon typing. It should not only filter the listbox with the starting letters but also the group of characters which could be found in between each item on the list. The list is a list of Item Name as a value and an Item Code as the key.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680  | Next Page >