Search Results

Search found 25547 results on 1022 pages for 'table locking'.

Page 681/1022 | < Previous Page | 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688  | Next Page >

  • Strange behaviour on postback in ASP.NET

    - by C-King
    I'm working on a website with a login form. To log in, a postback is used to an OnClick handler in the codebehind. Somehow, the value returned from the Text-property of the username and password textboxes is ten times the value I entered, separated by commas. I checked my entire code for double ID's (which seems to be the most common problem causing this behaviour), but I found each ID defined only once. In the ASPX file I have this: <asp:Label ID="lblFeedback" ForeColor="Red" Font-Bold="true" runat="server" Visible="false" /><br /> <asp:Panel ID="pnlLogin" runat="server"> <table style="border-style: none;"> <tr> <td> <asp:Label ID="lblUsername" AssociatedControlID="txtUsername" runat="server" /> </td> <td> <asp:TextBox ID="txtUsername" runat="server" /><br /> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <asp:Label ID="lblPassword" AssociatedControlID="txtPassword" runat="server" /> </td> <td> <asp:TextBox ID="txtPassword" runat="server" TextMode="password" /><br /> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <asp:Button ID="btnLogin" OnClick="btnLogin_Click" runat="server" /> </td> </tr> </table> </asp:Panel> The OnClick handler in the Codebehind: protected void btnLogin_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { string username = Util.Escape(txtUsername.Text); string password = Util.Escape(txtPassword.Text); WebsiteUser user = WebsiteUser.Create(username, password); if (user != null) { //Set some session variables and redirect to user profile } else { lblFeedback.Text = Localizer.Translate("INVALID_LOGIN"); lblFeedback.ForeColor = Color.Red; lblFeedback.Visible = true; pnlLogin.Visible = true; } } The website is running on ASP.NET 2.0 on ISS 5.1 (Win XP Pro)

    Read the article

  • MS SQL to PostgreSql

    - by Dezigo
    I need to create a trigger in MS SQL. Trigger works: If I found new line where T = 'A'; than.. add this line to PostgreSQL table. Is it possible to create it,without software? (I know how to create trigger,but how to create connection between two servers..?

    Read the article

  • Generate XSD from 2005 SQL Server Database

    - by Robert Finlayson
    What is the easiest method to generate an XSD schema from a 2005 SQL Server Database? Would it be possible to generate one XSD schema for the entire Database (~100 tables)? I searched online and found a SQL example that generates one XSD for the one table: DECLARE @schema xml SET @schema = (SELECT * FROM MyTableName FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS, XMLSCHEMA('MyTableNameSchema')) SELECT @schema Outside of SQL Server, is there a third party tool that could generate the XSD file from the 2005 Database?

    Read the article

  • Can I cache a ManyToOne hibernate object without it being lazy loaded?

    - by Andrew
    @ManyToOne @JoinColumn(name = "play_template_id", table = "team_play_mapping" ) public Play getPlay() { return play; } public void setPlay( Play play ) { this.play = play; } By default, this is eager loading. Can I get it so that it will read the play object from a cache without making it lazy loading? Am I correct that eager loading will force it to do a join query and hence no caching?

    Read the article

  • removing null valued columns from dataset in asp .net

    - by N.Sai Harish
    I have a table which stores data with null valued columns for some entries .I want to retrieve only Not null data to the detail view. I tried the following foreach(string strTableField in (objDataSet.Tables[0].Columns[i])) { if(objDataSet.Tables[0].Columns[i].Equals(null)) { objDataSet.Tables[0].Columns.Remove(strTableField); objDataSet.Tables[0].AcceptChanges(); } i++; } but it is giving error .. Pls help me reg this ...

    Read the article

  • Exporting collections

    - by Ruslan
    Hi, have select like select trn_dt,collect(ac_no) from transactions where rownum < 1000 group by trn_dt i'm doing it in SQL Navigator. But i can't export results! Table collect(ac_no) is not exported. Is there any way out?

    Read the article

  • jQuery: Giving each matched element an unique ID

    - by AnGafraidh
    I am writing an 'inline translator' application to be used with a cloud computing platform to extend non-supported languages. The majority of this uses jQuery to find the text value, replace it with the translation, then append the element with a span tag that has an unique ID, to be used elsewhere within the application. The problem arises however, when there are more than one element, say , that have the exact same value to be translated (matched elements). What happens in the function in question is that it puts all matched elements in the same span, taking the second, third, fourth, etc. out of their parent tags. My code is pretty much like this example: <script src='jquery-1.4.2.js'></script> <script> jQuery.noConflict(); var uniqueID='asdfjkl'; jQuery(window).ready(function() { var myQ1 = jQuery("input[id~=test1]"); myClone=myQ1.clone(); myClone.val('Replaced this button'); myQ1.replaceWith('<span id='+uniqueID+'></span>'); jQuery('#'+uniqueID).append(myClone); }); </script> <table> <tr><td> <input id='test1' type='button' value="I'm a button!"></input> &nbsp; <input id='test2' type='button' value="And so am I"></input> </tr></td> <tr><td> <input id='test1' type='button' value="I'm a button!"></input> </tr></td> </table> As a workaround, I've experimented with using a loop to create a class for each span, rising in increment until jQuery("input[id~=test1]").length, but I can't seem to get anything I do to work. Is there any way to give each matched element an unique ID? My fluency in jQuery is being put to the test! Thanks for any help in advance. Aaron

    Read the article

  • Write a SQL to meet my requirement.

    - by rgksugan
    I have been trying to solve this problem for a lot of days. But wouldn't. Please help me. I need a SQL to list product_code, product_name, qty_sold, last_order_date for all the products that have been sold within a date range sorted by the number of quantity sold. My Table structure: tbl_product(product_id,product_code,product_name) tbl_order_detail(order_item_id,order_id,product_id,quantity) tbl_order(order_id,order_date)

    Read the article

  • how to make DIV show up on top of other Divs

    - by feelexit
    I upload my code on jsFiddle, you can see it there. http://jsfiddle.net/SrT2U/2/ When you click on the link, the hidden FAQ section will show up, and it will push other divs down. But that is not what I want, I need all other divs stay where they are, and my hidden FAQ section just float on the top. Not sure how to do it. Not even sure if this should be done in HTML, CSS or jQuery. My jQuery code: $(function(){ $(".OpenTopMessage").click(function () { $("#details").slideToggle("slow"); }); }); HTML code: <div style="border: 1px solid #000;"> <span>link</span> <span>&nbsp;&nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> <span>link</span> <span>&nbsp;&nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> <span>link</span> <span>&nbsp;&nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> <span>link</span> <span>&nbsp;&nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> <span>link</span> <span>&nbsp;&nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> </div> <div id="faqBox"> <table width="100%"> <tr><td><a href="#" id="openFAQ" class="OpenTopMessage">this is hte faq section</a></td> </tr> </table> <div id="details" style="display:none"> <br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/> the display style property is set to none to ensure that the element no longer affects the layout of the page <br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/> </div> </div> <br/><br/> <div style="background:#c00;">other stuff heren the height reaches 0 after a hiding animation, the display style property is set to </div>

    Read the article

  • current_user.user_type_id = @employer ID

    - by sscirrus
    I am building a system with a User model (authenticated using AuthLogic) and three user types in three models: one of these models is Employer. Each of these three models has_many :users, :as = :authenticable. I start by having a new visitor to the site create their own 'User' record with username, password, which user type they are, etc. Upon creation, the user is sent to the 'new' action for one of the three models. So, if they tell us they are an employer, we redirect_to :controller = "employers, :action = "new". Question: When the employer has submitted, I want to set the current_user.user_type_id equal to the employer ID. This should be simple... but it's not working. # Employers Controller / new def new @employer = Employer.new 1.times {@employer.addresses.build} render :layout => 'forms' end # Employers Controller / create def create @employer = Employer.new(params[:employer]) if @employer.save if current_user.blank? redirect_to :controller => "users", :action => "new" else current_user.user_type_id = @employer.id current_user.user_type = "Employer" redirect_to :action => "home", :id => current_user.user_type_id end else render :action => "new" end end ------UPDATE------ Hi guys. In response: I am using this table structure because each of my three user type models have lots of different fields and each has different relationships to the other models, which is why I've avoided STI. By 1.times (@employer.addresses.build) I'm connecting the employer model to the address polymorphic table in one form, so I'm asking the controller to build a new address to go along with the new employer. Averell: you mentioned encapsulating... something in the model using a 'setter' method. I have no idea what you mean by this - could you please explain how this works (or direct me to an example elsewhere)? With tsdbrown's answer I have managed to create the behavior I want... if there's a more elegant way to accomplish the same thing I'd love to learn how. Thanks very much. Thanks to tsdbrown for answering the current_user.save problem!

    Read the article

  • How to handle null return from custom HttpHandler in asp.net?

    - by Campos
    I'm using a custom ashx HttpHandler to retrieve gif images from a database and show it on a website - when the image exists, it works great. However, there are cases when the image will not exist, and I'd like to have the html table holding the image to become invisible so the "image not found" icon is not shown. But since the HttpHandler is not synchronous, all my attempts checking for image size at Page_Load were frustrated. Any ideas on how this can be accomplished?

    Read the article

  • Select distinct values from multiple columns

    - by nuhusky2003
    I had a table (Some_Table) with two columns: A B ------------------- 1 test 2 test 3 test1 4 test1 i would like to return DISTINCT values for column B and it's associated value in column A (first in distinct set), so something like this: A B ----------- 1 test 3 test1 What is the sql?

    Read the article

  • oracle blob text search

    - by Skay
    Is it possible to search through blob text using sql statement? I can do select * from $table where f1 like '%foo%' if the f1 is varchar, how about f1 is a blob? Any counter part for this?

    Read the article

  • Cannot add or update a child row: a foreign key constraint fails

    - by Tom
    table 1 +----------+-------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +----------+-------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | UserID | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | Password | varchar(20) | NO | | | | | Username | varchar(25) | NO | | | | | Email | varchar(60) | NO | | | | +----------+-------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ table2 +------------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +------------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | UserID | int(11) | NO | MUL | | | | PostID | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | Title | varchar(50) | NO | | | | | Summary | varchar(500) | NO | | | | +------------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.MySQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException: Cannot add or update a child row: a foreign key constraint fails (myapp/table2, CONSTRAINT table2_ibfk_1 FOREIGN KEY (UserID) REFERENCES table1 (UserID)) What have I done wrong? I read this: http://www.w3schools.com/Sql/sql_foreignkey.asp and i don't see whats wrong. :S

    Read the article

  • Which is more flexible in regards to database changes, EF 4 or Linq to SQL

    - by JBeckton
    Reading about both Linq to SQL and Entity Framework I have developed the impression that EF is more suitable for apps that get data from multiple data sources. But as I am reading about MVC2 models I see an example where EF is more loosely coupled with your data model. If I have to add or remove some columns from a table then what is involved in updating my model or DAL with each of these implementations?

    Read the article

  • Need advice with a model - should I choose has_many through

    - by Martin Petrov
    I have something like a blog with posts and tags. I want to add email notification functionality - users can subscribe to one or more tags and receive email notifications when new posts are added. Currently I have a Tag model. There will be a Subscriber model (containing the user's email) Do you think I also need a Subscription table where Subscriber and Tag are joined? .. or I can skip it and directly link Subscriber with Tag?

    Read the article

  • php menu generated from a db

    - by Duncan Benoit
    Hi there, I have a database with products organized by categories and subcategories. The thing is that I generate a menu by querying the categories table. Because categories are almost the same(they can change/add once a month or something), I don't think I have to query the database for each access of the web-page. Do you have a better idea for me? Many thanks! ps: i'm using the cakephp framework

    Read the article

  • Filter Datagrid onLoad

    - by Morgan Delvanna
    My data grid successfully filters when I select a month from a dropdown list, however when I try to filter it onLoad it just doesn't filter. The dropdown successfully displays the current month, and the grid should also show the current month data. <script type="text/javascript"> dojo.require("dojox.grid.DataGrid"); dojo.require("dojox.data.XmlStore"); dojo.require("dijit.form.FilteringSelect"); dojo.require("dojo.data.ItemFileReadStore"); dojo.require("dojo.date"); theMonth = new Date(); dojo.addOnLoad(function() { dojo.byId('monthInput').value = month_name[(theMonth.getMonth()+1)]; var filterString='{month: "' + theMonth.getMonth() + '"}'; var filterObject=eval('('+filterString+')'); dijit.byId("eventGrid").filter(filterObject); } ); var eventStore = new dojox.data.XmlStore({url: "events.xml", rootItem: "event", keyAttribute: "dateSort"}); function monthClick() { var ctr, test, rtrn; test = dojo.byId('monthInput').value; for (ctr=0;ctr<=11;ctr++) { if (test==month_name[ctr]) { rtrn = ctr; } } var filterString='{month: "' + rtrn + '"}'; var filterObject=eval('('+filterString+')'); eventGrid.setQuery(filterObject); } </script> </head> <body class="tundra"> <div id="header" dojoType="dijit.layout.ContentPane" region="top" class="pfga"></div> <div id="menu" dojoType="dijit.layout.ContentPane" region="left" class="pfga"></div> <div id="content" style="width:750px; overflow:visible" dojoType="dijit.layout.ContentPane" region="center" class="pfga"> <div dojotype="dojo.data.ItemFileReadStore" url="months.json" jsID="monthStore"></div> <div id="pagehead" class="Heading1" >Upcoming Events</div> <p> <input dojoType="dijit.form.FilteringSelect" store="monthStore" searchAttr="month" name="id" id="monthInput" class="pfga" onChange="monthClick()" /> </p> <table dojoType="dojox.grid.DataGrid" store="eventStore" class="pfga" style="height:500px; width:698px" clientSort="true" jsID="eventGrid"> <thead> <tr> <th field="date" width="80px">Date</th> <th field="description" width="600px">Description</th> </tr> <tr> <th field="time" colspan="2">Details</th> </tr> </thead> </table> </div> <div id="footer"></div>

    Read the article

  • Problem persisting inheritance tree

    - by alaiseca
    I have a problem trying to map an inheritance tree. A simplified version of my model is like this: @MappedSuperclass @Embeddable public class BaseEmbedded implements Serializable { @Column(name="BE_FIELD") private String beField; // Getters and setters follow } @MappedSuperclass @Embeddable public class DerivedEmbedded extends BaseEmbedded { @Column(name="DE_FIELD") private String deField; // Getters and setters follow } @MappedSuperclass public abstract class BaseClass implements Serializable { @Embedded protected BaseEmbedded embedded; public BaseClass() { this.embedded = new BaseEmbedded(); } // Getters and setters follow } @Entity @Table(name="MYTABLE") @Inheritance(strategy=InheritanceType.SINGLE_TABLE) @DiscriminatorColumn(name="TYPE", discriminatorType=DiscriminatorType.STRING) public class DerivedClass extends BaseClass { @Id @Column(name="ID", nullable=false) private Long id; @Column(name="TYPE", nullable=false, insertable=false, updatable=false) private String type; public DerivedClass() { this.embedded = new DerivedClass(); } // Getters and setters follow } @Entity @DiscriminatorValue("A") public class DerivedClassA extends DerivedClass { @Embeddable public static NestedClassA extends DerivedEmbedded { @Column(name="FIELD_CLASS_A") private String fieldClassA; } public DerivedClassA() { this.embedded = new NestedClassA(); } // Getters and setters follow } @Entity @DiscriminatorValue("B") public class DerivedClassB extends DerivedClass { @Embeddable public static NestedClassB extends DerivedEmbedded { @Column(name="FIELD_CLASS_B") private String fieldClassB; } public DerivedClassB() { this.embedded = new NestedClassB(); } // Getters and setters follow } At Java level, this model is working fine, and I believe is the appropriate one. My problem comes up when it's time to persist an object. At runtime, I can create an object which could be an instance of DerivedClass, DerivedClassA or DerivedClassB. As you can see, each one of the derived classes introduces a new field which only makes sense for that specific derived class. All the classes share the same physical table in the database. If I persist an object of type DerivedClass, I expect fields BE_FIELD, DE_FIELD, ID and TYPE to be persisted with their values and the remaining fields to be null. If I persist an object of type DerivedClass A, I expect those same fields plus the FIELD_CLASS_A field to be persisted with their values and field FIELD_CLASS_B to be null. Something equivalent for an object of type DerivedClassB. Since the @Embedded annotation is at the BaseClass only, Hibernate is only persisting the fields up to that level in the tree. I don't know how to tell Hibernate that I want to persist up to the appropriate level in the tree, depending on the actual type of the embedded property. I cannot have another @Embedded property in the subclasses since this would duplicate data that is already present in the superclass and would also break the Java model. I cannot declare the embedded property to be of a more specific type either, since it's only at runtime when the actual object is created and I don't have a single branch in the hierarchy. Is it possible to solve my problem? Or should I resignate myself to accept that there is no way to persist the Java model as it is? Any help will be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688  | Next Page >