Search Results

Search found 28024 results on 1121 pages for 'sql 2014'.

Page 689/1121 | < Previous Page | 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696  | Next Page >

  • how to select the records whose several fields' combination will equal to a specific value

    - by poiu2000
    Hi all, Assume I have the following style table, col1 col2 and col3 have same value scopes, I want to select the records when two of the 3 columns have a value combination such as ('ab' and 'bc'), in the following example, the first 3 records should be selected. Any good way to do this? I am using Sybase. | id | col1 | col2 | col3 | 1 ab bc null 2 null ab bc 3 ab ab bc 4 de ab xy Thanks.

    Read the article

  • removing comma from string array

    - by sarah
    Hi, I want to execute a query like select ID from "xyz_DB"."test" where user in ('a','b') so the corresponding code is like String s="("; for(String user:selUsers){ s+= " ' " + user + " ', "; } s+=")"; Select ID from test where userId in s; The following code is forming the value of s as ('a','b',) i want to remove the comma after the end of array how to do this ?

    Read the article

  • How to differentiate two tables

    - by Nemat
    I have two tables and I want to get all records from one table that are different from the records in second table. Eg.: if we have four records in the first table like A,B,C,D and three records in the second table thats A,B,C then the answer of query should be D. I have tried "EXCEPT" operator but it doesn't work fine. Kindly help me in writing correct query for the given problem.

    Read the article

  • Most efficient way to Update with Linq2Sql

    - by pranay
    can I update my employee record as given in below function or i have to make query of employee collection first and than i update data public int updateEmployee(App3_EMPLOYEE employee) { DBContextDataContext db = new DBContextDataContext(); db.App3_EMPLOYEEs.Attach(employee); db.SubmitChanges(); return employee.PKEY; } or i have to do this public int updateEmployee(App3_EMPLOYEE employee) { DBContextDataContext db = new DBContextDataContext(); App3_EMPLOYEE emp = db.App3_EMPLOYEEs.Single(e => e.PKEY == employee.PKEY); db.App3_EMPLOYEEs.Attach(employee,emp); db.SubmitChanges(); return employee.PKEY; } But i dont want to use second option is there any efficient way to update data

    Read the article

  • Best way to get distinct values from large table

    - by derivation
    I have a db table with about 10 or so columns, two of which are month and year. The table has about 250k rows now, and we expect it to grow by about 100-150k records a month. A lot of queries involve the month and year column (ex, all records from march 2010), and so we frequently need to get the available month and year combinations (ie do we have records for april 2010?). A coworker thinks that we should have a separate table from our main one that only contains the months and years we have data for. We only add records to our main table once a month, so it would just be a small update on the end of our scripts to add the new entry to this second table. This second table would be queried whenever we need to find the available month/year entries on the first table. This solution feels kludgy to me and a violation of DRY. What do you think is the correct way of solving this problem? Is there a better way than having two tables?

    Read the article

  • Problem with MySQL query

    - by Psyche
    This time my setup looks like this: one table with galleries names (gallery_id, gallery_name) and another table with galleries photos (photo_id, photo_gallery_id, photo_name). What I need is to get all the galleries with one random picture for each gallery. Is it possible to do this with a single query?

    Read the article

  • Counting the instances of customers

    - by Mikae Combarado
    Say that I have a table with one column named CustomerId. The example of the instance of this table is : CustomerId 14 12 11 204 14 204 I want to write a query that counts the number of occurences of customer IDs. At the end, I would like to have a result like this : CustomerId NumberOfOccurences 14 2 12 1 11 1 204 2 14 1 I cannot think of a way to do this.

    Read the article

  • simple query Delete records in a table based on count logic

    - by user1905941
    a table with a pk and status column which is having values as 'Y','N','NULL' Query: get the count of records with status column as 'Y', if this count exceeds 1% of total count of records then dont delete , else delete the records in the table. i tried like this Declare v_count Number; v_count1 Number; BEGIN v_count := select count(*) from temp; v_count1 := select count(*) from temp where status = 'Y' ; v_count := v_count + ((0.1) * (v_count)) if (v_count1 > v_count) { insert into temp1 values(pk,status) } else { Delete from temp ; } END;

    Read the article

  • Help with sql query

    - by user225269
    I have two tables: subject and student. I'm trying to count the number of subjects enrolled by each student. How do I do that?I'm trying the code below but it doesn't give the answer I need. Please help. SELECT COUNT( subject.SUBJECT ) , student.IDNO, student.FIRSTNAME, subject.SUBJECT FROM student, subject GROUP BY subject.SUBJECT LIMIT 0 , 30

    Read the article

  • Is an index required for columns in ON clause?

    - by newbie
    Do I have to create an index on columns referenced in Joins? E.g. SELECT * FROM left_table INNER JOIN right_table ON left_table.foo = right_table.bar WHERE ... Should I create indexes on left_table(foo), right_table(bar), or both? I noticed different results when I used EXPLAIN (Postgresql) with and without indexes and switching around the order of the comparison (right_table.bar = left_table.foo) I know for sure that indexes are used for the left of the WHERE clause but I am wondering whether I need indexes for columns listed in ON clauses.

    Read the article

  • How can I select the required records?

    - by simple
    Tables: Product: [id, name, brand_id, is_published] Brand: [id, name, is_published] Awards: [id, name] ProductAwards [product_id, award_id] How do I select the list of PUBLISHED brands along with the number of AWARDS of brand's products that are Published. I am cool with all the part except issuing the "is_published" restriction when counting Awards. I hope this is clear; can anyone just suggest where to dig?

    Read the article

  • MySQL: group by and IF statement

    - by notset
    By default, parent_id = 0. I want to select all records with parent_id = 0 and only the last ones with parent_id 0. I tried this, but it didn't work: SELECT * FROM `articles` IF `parent_id` > 0 THEN GROUP BY `parent_id` HAVING COUNT(`parent_id`) >= 1 END; ORDER BY `time` DESC What could be the solution?

    Read the article

  • Entity diagram with tables that have foreign keys that point to a non-PK column do not show relation

    - by Jason Coyne
    I have two tables parent and child. If I make a foreign key on child that points to the primary key of parent, and then make an entity diagram, the relationship is shown correctly. If I make the foreign key point to a different column, the relationship is not shown. I have tried adding indexes to the column, but it does not have an effect. The database is sqlite, but I am not sure if that has an effect since its all hidden behind ADO.net. How do I get the relationship to work correctly?

    Read the article

  • Problems with mysql syntax

    - by user368453
    Hello everyone !! I´m trying to create a trigger on MySQL but I´m having a sintaxe problem, which I was not able to find. If someone more experient could help me it would be great (it´s the first time I use MySQL!)... The reason why I´m creating this trigger is for deleting all the orphan "labels", which has a many-to-many relation with "service_descriptor" (this two entities are linked by service_labels). The code I have is: CREATE TRIGGER trg_delete_orphan_label AFTER DELETE FOR EACH ROW ON restdb.service_labels DELETE FROM restdb.labels WHERE EXISTS (SELECT * FROM old D LEFT_JOIN restdb.service_labels SL ON SL.id_label = D.id_label AND D.id_service = SL.id_service WHERE SL.id_label IS NULL restdb.labels.id = D.SL.id_label ); Thanks in advance !

    Read the article

  • oracle query returns 4 duplicates of each row

    - by ajoe
    hello, I am Running a oracle query, it seems to work except that it returns 4 dupes of each result. here is the code: Select * from (Select a.*, rownum rnum From (SELECT NEW_USER.*, NEW_EHS_QUIZ_COMPLETE.datetime FROM NEW_USER, NEW_EHS_QUIZ_COMPLETE WHERE EXISTS(select * from NEW_EHS_QUIZ_COMPLETE where NEW_USER.id=NEW_EHS_QUIZ_COMPLETE.USER_ID) ORDER by last_name ASC ) a where rownum <= #pgtop# ) where rnum >= #pgbot# does anyone know why this isnt working properly? thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Firebird 2.1 + EXISTS = query bug?

    - by Atlas
    Using Delphi 2009 + Firebird 2.1.3. Database is ODS 11.1, default char set is UTF8. My prepared query is as follows: SELECT a.po_id, a.po_no FROM purchase_order a WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM sales_order_item z1 JOIN purchase_order_item z2 ON z2.so_item_id = z1.so_item_id AND z2.po_id = a.po_id WHERE z1.so_id = :soid) ORDER BY a.po_no Now when I loop this say 1000 times because I have 1000 x so_id, the CPU usage get at 100% for FBSERVER.EXE Anyone encountered this problem?

    Read the article

  • Help doing a dynamic sort?

    - by Kevin
    I have a notifications table which contains different types of notifications for different events. Inside the table is a notifications_type:string column that contains the type of notification, i.e. "foo" or "bar" or "oof" I want the user to be able to select what notifications they want to display, so there are checkboxes below the result that correspond to prefs_display_foo:boolean, prefs_display_bar:boolean in the User model. What is an elegant way for me to set the :conditions in the find to properly display the sorted results? Also, currently I have it as a method in the user, but how would I do it as a has_many :notifications, :conditions = .....

    Read the article

  • dbo in SqlServer

    - by ala
    I'm converting database from Teradata to SqlServer. I've noticed all tables and procedures are named by the prefix "dbo." (e.g. "dbo.Table1"). I would like to know if and how I can get rid of "dbo" because it would make the conversion task a lot more easier.

    Read the article

  • Find Consecutive Rows & Calculate Duration

    - by MannyKo
    I have a set a of data that tells me if a couple of systems are available or not every 5 or 15 minutes increments. For now, the time increment shouldn't matter. The data looks like this: Status Time System_ID T 10:00 S01 T 10:15 S01 F 10:30 S01 F 10:45 S01 F 11:00 S01 T 11:15 S01 T 11:30 S01 F 11:45 S01 F 12:00 S01 F 12:15 S01 T 12:30 S01 F 10:00 S02 F 10:15 S02 F 10:30 S02 F 10:45 S02 F 11:00 S02 T 11:15 S02 T 11:30 S02 I want to create a view that tells when a system is NOT available (i.e. when it is F), from what time, to what time, and duration which is to - from. Desired results: System_ID From To Duration S01 10:30 11:00 00:30 S01 11:45 12:15 00:30 S02 10:00 11:00 01:00 Here is the script data: DROP SCHEMA IF EXISTS Sys_data CASCADE; CREATE SCHEMA Sys_data; CREATE TABLE test_data ( status BOOLEAN, dTime TIME, sys_ID VARCHAR(10), PRIMARY KEY (dTime, sys_ID) ); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '10:00:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '10:15:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:30:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:45:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '11:00:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '11:15:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '11:30:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '11:45:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '12:00:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '12:15:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '12:30:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:00:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:15:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:30:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:45:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '11:00:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '11:15:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '11:30:00', 'S02'); Thank you in advance!

    Read the article

  • correct mysql syntax error

    - by user2981651
    please could someone tell me the problem with this syntax because mysql 5.5.32 keeps tell me about an error CREATE TABLE `clients` ( `ID` tinyint(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `title` varchar(10) NOT NULL default '', `firstName` varchar(30) NOT NULL default '', `lastName` varchar(30) NOT NULL default '', `address1` varchar(100) NOT NULL default '', `address2` varchar(100) NOT NULL default '', `town` varchar(100) NOT NULL default '', `province` varchar(100) NOT NULL default '', `country` varchar(40) NOT NULL default '', `postCode` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '', `telephone` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '', `email` varchar(100) NOT NULL default '', `cardNo` varchar(16) NOT NULL default '0000-00-00', `expiryDate` date NOT NULL default '0000-00-00', PRIMARY KEY (`ID`) ) TYPE=MyISAM COMMENT='customer table' AUTO_INCREMENT=1 ;

    Read the article

  • is NATURAL JOIN any better than SELECT FROM WHERE in terms of performance ?

    - by ashy_32bit
    Today I got into a debate with my project manager about Cartesian products. He says a 'natural join' is somehow much better than using 'select from where' because the later cause the db engine to internally perform a Cartesian product but the former uses another approach that prevents this. As far as I know, the natural join syntax is not any different in anyway than 'select from where' in terms of performance or meaning, I mean you can use either based on your taste. SELECT * FROM table1,table2 WHERE table1.id=table2.id SELECT * FROM table1 NATURAL JOIN table2 please elaborate about the first query causing a Cartesian product but the second one being somehow more smart

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696  | Next Page >