Search Results

Search found 32223 results on 1289 pages for 'sql 2012'.

Page 697/1289 | < Previous Page | 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704  | Next Page >

  • Select Statements in Jobs

    - by Andrew Vogel
    I have inherited a few jobs and I am trying to understand why select statements would be in their steps. I would think that select statements would be pointless in an automated job that displays nothing for an end user.

    Read the article

  • Trying to Understand PLSQL Function

    - by Rachel
    I am new to PLSQL and I have this huge plsql function which am trying to understand and am having hard time understanding the flow and so I would really appreciate if anyone can run me through the big pieces so that I can understand the flow. Guidance would be highly appreciated. FUNCTION monthly_analysis( REGION_ID_P VARCHAR2, COUNTRY_ID_P VARCHAR2 , SUB_REGION_ID_P VARCHAR2 , CUSTOMER_TYPE_ID_P VARCHAR2 , RECEIVED_FROM_DATE_P VARCHAR2 , RECEIVED_TO_DATE_P VARCHAR2, CUSTOMER_ID_P VARCHAR2 , PRIORITY_ID_P VARCHAR2, WORK_GROUP_ID_P VARCHAR2, CITY_ID_P VARCHAR2, USER_ID_P VARCHAR2 ) RETURN AP_ANALYSIS_REPORT_TAB_TYPE pipelined IS with_sql LONG; e_sql LONG; where_sql LONG; group_by_sql LONG; curent_date Date; v_row AP_ANALYSIS_REPORT_ROW_TYPE := AP_ANALYSIS_REPORT_ROW_TYPE( NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL ); TYPE rectyp IS REF CURSOR; -- define weak REF CURSOR type rrc_rectyp rectyp; TYPE recordvar IS RECORD( MONTHS VARCHAR2(100), ORDERBY_MONTHS VARCHAR2(100), REQ_RECEIVED NUMBER(9,2), REQ_STILL_OPEN NUMBER(9,2), REQ_AWAIT_ACCEPTANCE NUMBER(9,2), REQ_WITH_ATT NUMBER(9,2), REQ_CLOSED NUMBER(9,2), REQ_CANCELLED NUMBER(9,2) ); res_rec recordvar; BEGIN select sysdate +substr(to_char(systimestamp, 'tzr'),3,1)/24 into curent_date from dual; where_sql := ' AND 1=1 '; IF COUNTRY_ID_P IS NOT NULL THEN where_sql := where_sql ||' AND x.country_id ='|| COUNTRY_ID_P; END IF; IF SUB_REGION_ID_P IS NOT NULL THEN where_sql := where_sql ||' AND x.SUB_REGION_ID ='|| SUB_REGION_ID_P; END IF; IF CUSTOMER_TYPE_ID_P IS NOT NULL THEN where_sql := where_sql ||' AND x.CUSTOMER_TYPE_ID ='|| CUSTOMER_TYPE_ID_P; END IF; IF RECEIVED_FROM_DATE_P IS NOT NULL THEN where_sql := where_sql||' AND convert_time(received_date, ''GMT'', ''GMT'') >= convert_time(trunc(to_date('''||RECEIVED_FROM_DATE_P||''',''dd/mm/yyyy HH24:MI:SS'')), ''Europe/Paris'', ''GMT'')'; END IF; IF RECEIVED_TO_DATE_P IS NOT NULL THEN where_sql := where_sql||' AND convert_time(received_date, ''GMT'', ''GMT'') <= convert_time(trunc(to_date('''||RECEIVED_TO_DATE_P||''',''dd/mm/yyyy HH24:MI:SS'')), ''Europe/Paris'', ''GMT'')'; END IF; IF CUSTOMER_ID_P IS NOT NULL THEN where_sql := where_sql||' AND x.CUSTOMER_ID in(select CUSTOMER_ID from lk_customer where upper(CUSTOMER_NAME) like upper('''||CUSTOMER_ID_P||'%''))'; END IF; IF PRIORITY_ID_P IS NOT NULL THEN where_sql := where_sql ||' AND x.PRIORITY_ID ='|| PRIORITY_ID_P; END IF; IF WORK_GROUP_ID_P IS NOT NULL THEN where_sql := where_sql ||' AND x.WORKGROUP_ID ='|| WORK_GROUP_ID_P; END IF; IF CITY_ID_P IS NOT NULL THEN where_sql := where_sql ||' AND x.CITY_ID = ' || CITY_ID_P; END IF; group_by_sql := ' group by to_char(convert_time(received_date, ''GMT'', ''Europe/Paris''),''mm/YYYY''),to_char(convert_time(received_date, ''GMT'', ''Europe/Paris''),''yyyy/mm'')'; with_sql := 'with b AS (select cep_work_item_no from ap_main where req_accept_date is null and ecep_ap_utils.f_business_days(received_date,'''||curent_date||''')>30), e AS (select cep_work_item_no from ap_main where status_id=1 and req_accept_date is not null and stage_ID != 10 and stage_Id !=4 and ecep_ap_utils.f_business_days(received_date,'''||curent_date||''')>30), --f AS (select cep_work_item_no from ap_main where received_date is not null), m AS (select cep_work_item_no from ap_main where received_date is not null and status_id=1), n AS (select cep_work_item_no from ap_main where status_id=2), o AS (select cep_work_item_no from ap_main where status_id=3)'; --e_sql := ' SELECT MONTHS, REQ_RECEIVED,REQ_STILL_OPEN, REQ_AWAIT_ACCEPTANCE, REQ_WITH_ATT from ('; --e_sql := with_sql; e_sql := with_sql||' select to_char(convert_time(received_date, ''GMT'', ''Europe/Paris''),''mm/YYYY'') MONTHS, to_char(convert_time(received_date, ''GMT'', ''Europe/Paris''),''yyyy/mm'') ORDERBY_MONTHS, count(x.cep_work_item_no) REQ_RECEIVED, count(m.cep_work_item_no) REQ_STILL_OPEN,count(b.cep_work_item_no) REQ_AWAIT_ACCEPTANCE,count(e.cep_work_item_no) REQ_WITH_ATT, count(n.cep_work_item_no) REQ_CLOSED, count(o.cep_work_item_no) REQ_CANCELLED from emea_main x,m,b,e,n,o where x.cep_work_item_no=m.cep_work_item_no(+) and x.cep_work_item_no = b.cep_work_item_no(+) and x.cep_work_item_no=e.cep_work_item_no(+) and x.cep_work_item_no=n.cep_work_item_no(+) and x.cep_work_item_no=o.cep_work_item_no(+) and x.received_date is not null'; e_sql := e_sql|| where_sql||group_by_sql; OPEN rrc_rectyp FOR e_sql; LOOP FETCH rrc_rectyp INTO res_rec; EXIT WHEN rrc_rectyp%NOTFOUND; v_row.MONTHS := res_rec.MONTHS ; v_row.ORDERBY_MONTHS := res_rec.ORDERBY_MONTHS ; v_row.REQ_RECEIVED := res_rec.REQ_RECEIVED; v_row.REQ_STILL_OPEN := res_rec.REQ_STILL_OPEN; v_row.REQ_AWAIT_ACCEPTANCE := res_rec.REQ_AWAIT_ACCEPTANCE; v_row.REQ_WITH_ATT := res_rec.REQ_WITH_ATT; v_row.REQ_CLOSED := res_rec.REQ_CLOSED; v_row.REQ_CANCELLED := res_rec.REQ_CANCELLED; pipe ROW(v_row); END LOOP; RETURN; END monthly_analysis; And would also appreciate if someone can let me know as to what are the important plsql concepts used here so that I can go ahead and understand them in a better way and some small explanation would go long way. As suggested by dcp, i am trying to use debugger, again I have not used it before and so pardon me, here is what am getting: DECLARE REGION_ID_P VARCHAR2(200); COUNTRY_ID_P VARCHAR2(200); SUB_REGION_ID_P VARCHAR2(200); CUSTOMER_TYPE_ID_P VARCHAR2(200); RECEIVED_FROM_DATE_P VARCHAR2(200); RECEIVED_TO_DATE_P VARCHAR2(200); CUSTOMER_ID_P VARCHAR2(200); PRIORITY_ID_P VARCHAR2(200); WORK_GROUP_ID_P VARCHAR2(200); CITY_ID_P VARCHAR2(200); USER_ID_P VARCHAR2(200); v_Return GECEPDEV.AP_ANALYSIS_REPORT_TAB_TYPE; BEGIN REGION_ID_P := NULL; COUNTRY_ID_P := NULL; SUB_REGION_ID_P := NULL; CUSTOMER_TYPE_ID_P := NULL; RECEIVED_FROM_DATE_P := NULL; RECEIVED_TO_DATE_P := NULL; CUSTOMER_ID_P := NULL; PRIORITY_ID_P := NULL; WORK_GROUP_ID_P := NULL; CITY_ID_P := NULL; USER_ID_P := NULL; v_Return := ECEP_AP_REPORTS.MONTHLY_ANALYSIS( REGION_ID_P => REGION_ID_P, COUNTRY_ID_P => COUNTRY_ID_P, SUB_REGION_ID_P => SUB_REGION_ID_P, CUSTOMER_TYPE_ID_P => CUSTOMER_TYPE_ID_P, RECEIVED_FROM_DATE_P => RECEIVED_FROM_DATE_P, RECEIVED_TO_DATE_P => RECEIVED_TO_DATE_P, CUSTOMER_ID_P => CUSTOMER_ID_P, PRIORITY_ID_P => PRIORITY_ID_P, WORK_GROUP_ID_P => WORK_GROUP_ID_P, CITY_ID_P => CITY_ID_P, USER_ID_P => USER_ID_P ); -- Modify the code to output the variable -- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('v_Return = ' || v_Return); END; Can anyone guide me through this query and its goal ?

    Read the article

  • help with exception handling in linq

    - by stackoverflowuser
    I have the following code to retrieve customer name, total (orders ), sum (order details) for reach customer in Northwind database. The problem with below code is that it raises an exception since a few customers dont have any entry in orders table. I know using the query syntax (join) the exception can be avoided. I want to know if the same can be handled with the extension method syntax. CustomerOrderDataContext db = new CustomerOrderDataContext(); var customerOrders = db.Customers.Select(c => new { CompanyName = c.CompanyName, TotalOrders = c.Orders.Count(), TotalQuantity = c.Orders.SelectMany(o => o.Order_Details).Sum(o=>o.Quantity) });

    Read the article

  • mysql - speedup regex

    - by Uwe
    I have a table: +--------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +--------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | idurl | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | idsite | int(10) unsigned | NO | MUL | NULL | | | url | varchar(2048) | NO | | NULL | | +--------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ the select statement is: SELECT idurl, url FROM URL WHERE idsite = 34 AND url REGEXP '^https\\://www\\.domain\\.com/checkout/step_one\\.php.*' The query needs 5 seconds on a table with 1000000 rows. Can I achieve a speedup with indexes or something else?

    Read the article

  • stored procedure to find value in 2 columns out of 3

    - by user1510533
    I am putting in the samle date and i am supposed to do something similar what i am asking. I want to run a query that would pull values in any two columns out 3 if it has a 1 or if any one column has a 1 it will return just those results. However it should search all three columns and in any of the three columns where it found value as 1 it should return that result. Can anyone please help me with this. Thanks in advance. ID Patient Patient Name prio prio2 prio3 ------------------------------------------------- 1 101563 Robert Riley 1 1 1 2 101583 Cody Ayers 1 0 1 3 101825 Jason Lawler 0 0 1 4 101984 Dustin Lumis 1 0 0 5 102365 Stacy smith 1 0 0 6 102564 Frank Milon 1 0 0 7 102692 Thomas Kroning 1 0 0 8 102856 Andrew Philips 1 0 0 9 102915 Alice Davies 0 0 1 10 103785 Jon Durley 0 0 1 11 103958 Clayton Folsom 1 1 1 12 104696 Michelle Holsley 1 1 1 13 104983 Teresa Jones 1 0 1 14 105892 Betsy Prat 1 1 0 15 106859 Casey Ayers 1 1 0

    Read the article

  • Updating PHP on a Plesk managed Server

    - by mblaettermann
    I just updated PHP and MySQl on my VPS with the current Versions from Atomic Repo. Everything worked out fine so far. From console I get the new PHP 5.3: [root@server phpMyAdmin]# php -v PHP 5.3.16 (cli) (built: Aug 20 2012 11:18:05) Copyright (c) 1997-2012 The PHP Group Zend Engine v2.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2012 Zend Technologies with the ionCube PHP Loader v4.0.5, Copyright (c) 2002-2011, by ionCube Ltd. But through Apache I still get the old version (5.1.6). The server is running some old version of crappy Plesk Panel. That gives me the option to choose between Apache Modul, fCGI and CGI-BIN. Any hints, how to update apache, so it will use the new PHP Version? EDIT: I just needed to restart httpd (/etc/init.d/httpd restart)

    Read the article

  • Active Record/ORM vs Normal Forms?

    - by Arsenal
    Hello, I've been playing around with Active Record a bit, and I have noticed that A.C./ORM always uses the following database model when creating a one-to-one relationship Person id | country_id | name | ... Country id | tld | name | ... No I wondered, isn't this a violiation of the third Normal Form? This clearly states "Every non-prime attribute is non-transitively dependent on every key of the table". Well this country_id isn't dependent of personid is it? So is this wrong or am I just not getting the point?

    Read the article

  • How do you compare dates in a LINQ query?

    - by Gina
    I am tring to compare a date from a asp calendar control to a date in the table.... here's what i have... it doesn't like the == ? var query = from details in db.TD_TravelCalendar_Details where details.StartDate == calStartDate.SelectedDate && details.EndDate == calEndDate.SelectedDate select details;

    Read the article

  • How to manage multiple versions of the same record

    - by Darvis Lombardo
    I am doing short-term contract work for a company that is trying to implement a check-in/check-out type of workflow for their database records. Here's how it should work... 1) A user creates a new entity within the application. There are about 20 related tables that will be populated in addition to the main entity table. 2) Once the entity is created the user will mark it as the master. 3) Another user can make changes to the master only by "checking out" the entity. Multiple users can checkout the entity at the same time. 4) Once the user has made all the necessary changes to the entity, they put it in a "needs approval" status. 5) After an authorized user reviews the entity, they can promote it to master which will put the original record in a tombstoned status. The way they are currently accomplishing the "check out" is by duplicating the entity records in all the tables. The primary keys include EntityID + EntityDate, so they duplicate the entity records in all related tables with the same EntityID and an updated EntityDate and give it a status of "checked out". When the record is put into the next state (needs approval), the duplication occurs again. Eventually it will be promoted to master at which time the final record is marked as master and the original master is marked as dead. This design seems hideous to me, but I understand why they've done it. When someone looks up an entity from within the application, they need to see all current versions of that entity. This was a very straightforward way for making that happen. But the fact that they are representing the same entity multiple times within the same table(s) doesn't sit well with me, nor does the fact that they are duplicating EVERY piece of data rather than only storing deltas. I would be interested in hearing your reaction to the design, whether positive or negative. I would also be grateful for any resoures you can point me to that might be useful for seeing how someone else has implemented such a mechanism. Thanks! Darvis

    Read the article

  • Bulk inserting and updating with Entity Framework (Probably a better alternative?)

    - by Dave
    I have a data set of devices, addresses, and companies that I need to import into our database, with the catch that our database may already include a specific device/address/company that is included in the new data set. If that is the case, I need to update that entry with the new information in the data set, excluding addresses. We check if an exact copy of that address exists, otherwise we make a new entry. My issue is that it is very slow to attempt to grab a device/company in EF and if it exist updated it, otherwise insert it. To fix this I tried to get all the companies, devices, and addresses and insert them into respective hashmaps, and check if the identifier of the new data exists in the hashmap. This hasn't led to any performance increases. I've included my code below. Typically I would do a batch insert, I'm not sure what I would do for a batch update though. Can someone advise a different route? var context = ObjectContextHelper.CurrentObjectContext; var oldDevices = context.Devices; var companies = context.Companies; var addresses = context.Addresses; Dictionary<string, Company> companyMap = new Dictionary<string, Company>(StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase); Dictionary<string, Device> deviceMap = new Dictionary<string, Device>(StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase); Dictionary<string, Address> addressMap = new Dictionary<string, Address>(StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase); foreach (Company c in companies) { if (c.CompanyAccountID != null && !companyMap.ContainsKey(c.CompanyAccountID)) companyMap.Add(c.CompanyAccountID, c); } foreach (Device d in oldDevices) { if (d.SerialNumber != null && !deviceMap.ContainsKey(d.SerialNumber)) deviceMap.Add(d.SerialNumber, d); } foreach (Address a in addresses) { string identifier = GetAddressIdentifier(a); if (!addressMap.ContainsKey(identifier)) addressMap.Add(identifier, a); } foreach (DeviceData.TabsDevice device in devices) { // update a device Company tempCompany; Address tempAddress; Device currentDevice; if (deviceMap.ContainsKey(device.SerialNumber)) //update a device deviceMap.TryGetValue(device.SerialNumber, out currentDevice); else // insert a new device currentDevice = new Device(); currentDevice.SerialNumber = device.SerialNumber; currentDevice.SerialNumberTABS = device.SerialNumberTabs; currentDevice.Model = device.Model; if (device.CustomerAccountID != null && device.CustomerAccountID != "") { companyMap.TryGetValue(device.CustomerAccountID, out tempCompany); currentDevice.CustomerID = tempCompany.CompanyID; currentDevice.CustomerName = tempCompany.CompanyName; } if (companyMap.TryGetValue(device.ServicingDealerAccountID, out tempCompany)) currentDevice.CompanyID = tempCompany.CompanyID; currentDevice.StatusID = 1; currentDevice.Retries = 0; currentDevice.ControllerFamilyID = 1; if (currentDevice.EWBFrontPanelMsgOption == null) // set the Panel option to the default if it isn't set already currentDevice.EWBFrontPanelMsgOption = context.EWBFrontPanelMsgOptions.Where( i => i.OptionDescription.Contains("default")).Single(); // link the device to the existing address as long as it is actually an address if (addressMap.TryGetValue(GetAddressIdentifier(device.address), out tempAddress)) { if (GetAddressIdentifier(device.address) != "") currentDevice.Address = tempAddress; else currentDevice.Address = null; } else // insert a new Address and link the device to it (if not null) { if (GetAddressIdentifier(device.address) == "") currentDevice.Address = null; else { tempAddress = new Address(); tempAddress.Address1 = device.address.Address1; tempAddress.Address2 = device.address.Address2; tempAddress.Address3 = device.address.Address3; tempAddress.Address4 = device.address.Address4; tempAddress.City = device.address.City; tempAddress.Country = device.address.Country; tempAddress.PostalCode = device.address.PostalCode; tempAddress.State = device.address.State; addresses.AddObject(tempAddress); addressMap.Add(GetAddressIdentifier(tempAddress), tempAddress); currentDevice.Address = tempAddress; } } if (!deviceMap.ContainsKey(device.SerialNumber)) // if inserting, add to context { oldDevices.AddObject(currentDevice); deviceMap.Add(device.SerialNumber, currentDevice); } } context.SaveChanges();

    Read the article

  • Compare and find differences in two tables in Oracle

    - by Ruslan
    Hi! i have 2 tables: account: ID, ACC, AE_CCY, DRCR_IND, AMOUNT, MODULE flex: ID, ACC, AE_CCY, DRCR_IND, AMOUNT, MODULE I want to show differences comparing only by: AE_CCY, DRCR_IND, AMOUNT, MODULE and ACC by first 4 characters Example: ID ACC AE_CCY DRCR_IND AMOUNT MODULE -- --------- ------ -------- ------ ------ 1 734647674 USD D 100 OP and in flex: ID ACC AE_CCY DRCR_IND AMOUNT MODULE -- --------- ------ -------- ------ ------ 1 734647654 USD D 100 OP 2 734665474 USD D 100 OP 9 734611111 USD D 100 OP ID's 2 and 9 should be shown as differences. If I use FULL JOIN I'll get no differences as substr(account.ACC,1,4) = substr(flex.ACC,1,4) are equal and others are equal and MINUS doesn't work because ID's different. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • (N)Hibernate: deleting orphaned ternary association rows when either associated row is deleted.

    - by anthony
    I have a ternary association table created using the following mapping: <map name="Associations" table="FooToBar"> <key column="Foo_id"/> <index-many-to-many class="Bar" column="Bar_id"/> <element column="AssociationValue" /> </map> I have 3 tables, Foo, Bar, and FooToBar. When I delete a row from the Foo table, the associated row (or rows) in FooToBar is automatically deleted. This is good. When I delete a row from the Bar table, the associated row (or rows) in FooToBar remain, with a stale reference to a Bar id that no longer exists. This is bad. How can I modify my hbm.xml to remove stale FooToBar rows when deleting from the Bar table?

    Read the article

  • Complex SQL query, one to many relationship

    - by Ethan
    Hey SO, I have a query such that I need to get A specific dog All comments relating to that dog The user who posted each comment All links to images of the dog the user who posted each link I've tried a several things, and can't figure out quite how to work it. Here's what I have (condensed so you don't have to wade through it all): SELECT s.dog_id, s.name, c.comment, c.date_added AS comment_date_added, u.username AS comment_username, u.user_id AS comment_user_id, l.link AS link, l.date_added AS link_date_added, u2.username AS link_username, u2.user_id AS link_user_id FROM dogs AS d LEFT JOIN comments AS c ON c.dog_id = d.dog_id LEFT JOIN users AS u ON c.user_id = u.user_id LEFT JOIN links AS l ON l.dog_id = d.dog_id LEFT JOIN users AS u2 ON l.user_id = u2.user_id WHERE d.dog_id = '1' It's sorta close to working, but it'll only return me the first comment, and the first link all as one big array with all the info i requested. The are multiple comments and links per dog, so I need it to give me all the comments and all the links. Ideally it'd return an object with dog_id, name, comments(an array of the comments), links(an array of the links) and then comments would have a bunch of comments, date_added, username, and user_id and links would have a bunch of links with link, date_added, username and user_id. It's got to work even if there are no links or comments. I learned the basics of mySQL somewhat recently, but this is pretty far over my head. Any help would be wonderful. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • PostgreSQL, Foreign Keys, Insert speed & Django

    - by Miles
    A few days ago, I ran into an unexpected performance problem with a pretty standard Django setup. For an upcoming feature, we have to regenerate a table hourly, containing about 100k rows of data, 9M on the disk, 10M indexes according to pgAdmin. The problem is that inserting them by whatever method literally takes ages, up to 3 minutes of 100% disk busy time. That's not something you want on a production site. It doesn't matter if the inserts were in a transaction, issued via plain insert, multi-row insert, COPY FROM or even INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t2. After noticing this isn't Django's fault, I followed a trial and error route, and hey, the problem disappeared after dropping all foreign keys! Instead of 3 minutes, the INSERT INTO SELECT FROM took less than a second to execute, which isn't too surprising for a table <= 20M on the disk. What is weird is that PostgreSQL manages to slow down inserts by 180x just by using 3 foreign keys. Oh, disk activity was pure writing, as everything is cached in RAM; only writes go to the disks. It looks like PostgreSQL is working very hard to touch every row in the referred tables, as 3MB/sec * 180s is way more data than the 20MB this new table takes on disk. No WAL for the 180s case, I was testing in psql directly, in Django, add ~50% overhead for WAL logging. Tried @commit_on_success, same slowness, I had even implemented multi row insert and COPY FROM with psycopg2. That's another weird thing, how can 10M worth of inserts generate 10x 16M log segments? Table layout: id serial primary, a bunch of int32, 3 foreign keys to small table, 198 rows, 16k on disk large table, 1.2M rows, 59 data + 89 index MB on disk large table, 2.2M rows, 198 + 210MB So, am I doomed to either drop the foreign keys manually or use the table in a very un-Django way by defining saving bla_id x3 and skip using models.ForeignKey? I'd love to hear about some magical antidote / pg setting to fix this.

    Read the article

  • Setting property of objects in datacontext

    - by ryudice
    Hi, all my entities have a common property which specifies the company they belong to, I would like to set this property in a method in my datacontext but I do not want to use the partial methods for each of the entity types that the datacontext provides, is there a method that receives any entity that is inserted throught the datacontext so that I can hook to it or override it and set the property using reflection? thanks.

    Read the article

  • Linq like or other construction

    - by Yauhen Kavalenka
    I have DB oracle in my solution. I want to have some results in this query. Query example: select * from doctor where doctor.name like '%IVANOV_A%'; But if i do it at LINQ i cannot get any result. from p in repository.Doctor.Where(x => x.Name.ToLower().Containsname)) select p; Where 'name' is variable of string parameter. Web layout request next string: "Ivanov a" or "A Ivanov" But i suggest for user choose you pattetn for query. How i can to get "patient by name" if name consist of "First name" and "Last name" but user doesn't know your doctor's full name?

    Read the article

  • Does the optimizer filter subqueries with outer where clauses

    - by Mongus Pong
    Take the following query: select * from ( select a, b from c UNION select a, b from d ) where a = 'mung' Will the optimizer generally work out that I am filtering a on the value 'mung' and consequently filter mung on each of the queries in the subquery. OR will it run each query within the subquery union and return the results to the outer query for filtering (as the query would perhaps suggest) In which case the following query would perform better : select * from ( select a, b from c where a = 'mung' UNION select a, b from d where a = 'mung' ) Obviously query 1 is best for maintenance, but is it sacrificing much performace for this? Which is best?

    Read the article

  • MySQL - are FK's useful / viable in a web app?

    - by yoda
    Hi all, I've encountered this discussion related to FK's and web applications. Basically some people say that FK's in web applications doesn't represent a real improvement and can even make the application slower in some cases. What do you guys think, what's your experience? -- A quote from Heikki Tuuri, creator of InnoDB engine, founder and CEO of Innobase: InnoDB checks foreign keys as soon as a row is updated, no batching is performed or checks delayed till transaction commit Foreign keys are often serious performance overhead, but help maintain data consistency Foreign Keys increase amount of row level locking done and can make it spread to a lot of tables besides the ones directly updated

    Read the article

  • SYSDATE - 1 error on pl/sql function

    - by ayo
    Hi curtisk/all, I have an issue: when i issue this function below ti gives me the following error: select 'EXECUTE DBMS_LOGMNR.ADD_LOGFILE(LOGFILENAME =>'''||name||'''||,OPTIONS=>DBMS_LOGMNR.NEW);' from v\$archived_log where name is not null; select 'EXECUTE DBMS_LOGMNR.ADD_LOGFILE(LOGFILENAME =>'''||name||'''||,OPTIONS=>DBMS_LOGMNR.ADDFILE);' from v\$archived_log where name is not null; EXECUTE DBMS_LOGMNR.START_LOGMNR( STARTTIME => SYSDATE - 1, ENDTIME => SYSDATE, OPTIONS => DBMS_LOGMNR.DICT_FROM_ONLINE_CATALOG + DBMS_LOGMNR.CONTINUOUS_MINE + DBMS_LOGMNR.COMMITTED_DATA_ONLY + DBMS_LOGMNR.PRINT_PRETTY_SQL); Error: * ERROR at line 1: ORA-01291: missing logfile ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_LOGMNR", line 58 ORA-06512: at line 1 But i have added all the archived logs for several days before and my sysdate is at today. Kindly help out on this issue. thanks. Reagrds Ayo

    Read the article

  • Hmm, why finding by '2' or '2' return the same record?

    - by SXLee
    Hi everyone, forget my newbie question, but why finding by '2' or '2' in Mysql returns the same record? For example: Say I have a record with string field named 'slug', and the value is '2'. And the following SQLs returns same record. SELECT * From articles WHERE slug='2' SELECT * From articles WHERE slug='2'

    Read the article

  • Problem with LINQ in C#

    - by David Bonnici
    I am encountering a problem when using LINQ in C#, I am constantly getting "Specified cast is not valid". This is what I am trying to do. I create a class in which I declare all the columns of the table. [Table(Name="tbl_Aff")] public class Affiliate { [Column] public string name; [Column] public string firstname; [Column] public string surname; [Column] public string title; } I then declare a strongly typed DataContext in which I declare all Table collections as members of the context. public partial class Database : DataContext { public Table affiliate; public Database() : base(Settings.getConnectionString()) { } //This method gets the connection string by reading from an XML file. } public partial class Default : System.Web.UI.Page { protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { Database database = new Database(); try { var q = from a in database.affiliate select a; foreach (var aff in q) // Here I get the error "Specified cast is not valid" { lblMessage.InnerHtml += aff.name + ""; } } catch (Exception ex) { System.Console.WriteLine(ex.Message); } } }

    Read the article

  • Continuously checking database from a Windows service

    - by JonF
    I am making a Windows service which needs to continuously check for database entries that can be added at any time to tell it to execute some code. It is looking to see if it's status is set to pending, and it's execute time entry is than the current time. Is the only way to do this to just run select statements over and over? It might need to execute the code every minute which means I need to run the select statement every minute looking for entries in the database. I'm trying to avoid unneccesary cpu time because I'm probably going to end up paying for cpu cycles on the hosting provider

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704  | Next Page >