Search Results

Search found 39082 results on 1564 pages for 'magic function'.

Page 701/1564 | < Previous Page | 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708  | Next Page >

  • Highlighting current and previous stars on mouseover

    - by mpet
    I'm trying to make simple five star rating system using Twitter Bootstrap 3 i jQuery. For now, I'm trying to set .hover() and .mouseout() events using counter by writing this code that doesn't work: var i; for (i = 1; i <= 5; i++) { $('#overall_rating_' + i).hover(function(){ $('#overall_rating_' + i).removeClass("glyphicon-star-empty").addClass("glyphicon-star"); }); $('#overall_rating_' + i).mouseout(function(){ $('#overall_rating_' + i).removeClass("glyphicon-star").addClass("glyphicon-star-empty"); }); } Trying to highlight current and previous stars on mouseover. The code is not complete, it would be accompanied by additional sub-counters, but this part doesn't work for now. Any better methods are welcome. What's broken here?

    Read the article

  • Prevent Cookies From Being Sent on AJAX Request

    - by user340571
    Hello everyone, I have a web service that I invoke from script but that does not need any information stored in cookies. Anytime I make a request to the service, the cookie is sent along with it. I understand that by default cookies are sent with HTTP request, but is there any way at all to overwrite that behavior and not send the cookie? In a nutshell, I am issuing my request like this: $.ajax({ type: "POST", cache: false, url: url, data: data, contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", dataType: "json", success: function(response) { successFunc(response); }, error: function(xhr) { errorFunc(xhr); } });

    Read the article

  • When dragged and on mouseup/mouseleave in the document I want to call my Ajax request

    - by Sappy
    For slider range - when dragged and on mouseup/mouseleave in the document I want to call my Ajax request. Explained: When I mousedown to slide my slider I want to say isDown = "true" But it doesn't works. Can anyone please help me with this and let me know how do I achieve this. // Default isDown = false $("#slider-range").find('a').mousedown(function(){ isDown=true; console.log(isDown); // It works here! }); console.log(isDown); // It doesn't works here if(isDown) { $(document).onmouseup(function() { return setAjaxRequest(); isDown = false; }); }

    Read the article

  • Checkbox Issue with IE8 using jquery

    - by rockers
    I have this code $('#Submit').click(function(event) { var checked = $('.inputchbox'); ......IE8 var ids= checked.map(function() { return $(this).val(); }).get().join(','); alert(ids); }); This Code return all the values which is there for Checkboxbox (.inputchbox is class for the checkbox) but If I give somethign like this var checked = $('.inputchbox input:checkbox:checked'); or var checked = $('.inputchbox input[type=checkbox]:checked'); or var checked = $('.inputchbox input[name=chk]:checked'); or var checked = $('.inputchbox').find('input[type=checkbox]:checked'); if i am giving like this nothing is working for me I am not getting the result in IE8? var checked = $('.inputchbox'); .....this is working but I am getting the checkboxes ids its doesnot checking wheather its checked or not.. I need to get only checked chekcbox id's thanks

    Read the article

  • help me with typecasting problem ...

    - by Anil Namde
    I would like to create a function which can take two arguments object and type and then type cast the object to appropriate type using the type parameter. Is that possible ? how can i achieve it ? public class TEST { public int test; } object ot = new TEST(); Type type = typeof(TEST); TEST t = (type)ot; //Function will be something like this public string SearializeObject(Object obj, Type t) { //check if obj is of type t if(obj is of type t){ //cast obj to type t to read it ((Type t)obj).someMethod } }

    Read the article

  • as3 dynamic button name capturing problem

    - by user16458
    i am using this code below to dynamically capture the name of the button pressed and then playing the related balloon movie clip animation. stage.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, player); function player(evt:MouseEvent){ var nameofballoon = evt.target.name; nameofballoon =nameofballoon.substring(nameofballoon.length-1,nameofballoon.length); var movie = "balloon"+nameofballoon; trace(movie); movie.gotoAndPlay("burst"); } i'm getting this error even though the name of the clip capture by the event is correct TypeError: Error #1006: value is not a function. at Balloons2_fla::MainTimeline/player() any thoughts ? what wrong with this code?

    Read the article

  • How to check whether your code environment on Windows or on Linux or other OS

    - by justjoe
    hi, right now, i code custom wordpress theme and testing it in xampp windows XP on apache server. But as long as i concern, there's no wp build-in function to identify the code environment. Is there's any PHP build-in function to identify such thing ? for the record, what i want to code need to read a directory. in my apache (in windows), the path will be c:/xampp/htdocs where apache on linux will be \somepath\somepath\ so, is there any code solution to know what is the OS environment without i have to compare the path ? i hope it will also work on other OS with other webserver then APACHE such as IIS

    Read the article

  • PHP - Why does my computation produce a different result when I assign it to a variable?

    - by David
    I want to round a number to a specific number of significant digits - basically I want the following function: round(12345.67, 2) -> 12000 round(8888, 3) -> 8890 I have the following, but there's a strange problem. function round_to_sf($number, $sf) { $mostsigplace = floor(log10(abs($number)))+1; $num = $number / pow(10, ($mostsigplace-$sf)); echo ($number / pow(10, ($mostsigplace-$sf))).' '.$num.'<BR>'; } round_to_sf(41918.522, 1); Produces the following output: 4.1918522 -0 How can the result of a computation be different when it's assigned to a variable?

    Read the article

  • Execute js on DOMContentLoaded in ff-extension

    - by ArtWorkAD
    Hi, I want to enable jQuery for my extension. So I want to do something similar to $(document).ready(function() { // put all your jQuery goodness in here. }); So I came up with var app = window.document.getElementById('page'); app.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", onPageLoad, false); function onPageLoad(){ alert("test"); } But this does not work at all. Any ideas how to call onPageLoad each time DOM content is reloaded?

    Read the article

  • code in xmlhttp.readyState==4 doen't get executed

    - by shazia
    function download() { if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {// code for IE7+, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest(); } else {// code for IE6, IE5 xmlhttp=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=function() { //alert(xmlhttp.readyState); if(xmlhttp.readyState==4 && xmlhttp.status==200) { alert (xmlhttp.responseText); } } xmlhttp.open("GET","import.php?file="+document.getElementById('uploaded_file').value,false); xmlhttp.send(); // location.reload(true); } if I put alert and monitor xmlhttp.readyState then it shows me that its status does turn 4 and it does go in the if statement, if I don't monitor it with alert then it doesn't go in the if statement but I know import.php is working because I can see the changes in the database. I don't know whats going on...can anyone help. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Looping class, for template engine kind of thing

    - by tarnfeld
    Hey, I am updating my class Nesty so it's infinite but I'm having a little trouble.... Here is the class: <?php Class Nesty { // Class Variables private $text; private $data = array(); private $loops = 0; private $maxLoops = 0; public function __construct($text,$data = array(),$maxLoops = 5) { // Set the class vars $this->text = $text; $this->data = $data; $this->maxLoops = $maxLoops; } // Loop funtion private function loopThrough($data) { if( ($this->loops +1) > $this->maxLoops ) { die("ERROR: Too many loops!"); } else { $keys = array_keys($data); for($x = 0; $x < count($keys); $x++) { if(is_array($data[$keys[$x]])) { $this->loopThrough($data[$keys[$x]]); } else { return $data[$keys[$x]]; } } } } // Templater method public function template() { echo $this->loopThrough($this->data); } } ?> Here is the code you would use to create an instance of the class: <?php // The nested array $data = array( "person" => array( "name" => "Tom Arnfeld", "age" => 15 ), "product" => array ( "name" => "Cakes", "price" => array ( "single" => 59, "double" => 99 ) ), "other" => "string" ); // Retreive the template text $file = "TestData.tpl"; $fp = fopen($file,"r"); $text = fread($fp,filesize($file)); // Create the Nesty object require_once('Nesty.php'); $nesty = new Nesty($text,$data); // Save the newly templated text to a variable $message $message = $nesty->template(); // Print out $message on the page echo("<pre>".$message."</pre>"); ?> Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Array-size macro that rejects pointers

    - by nneonneo
    The standard array-size macro that is often taught is #define ARRAYSIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0])) or some equivalent formation. However, this kind of thing silently succeeds when a pointer is passed in, and gives results that can seem plausible at runtime until things mysteriously fall apart. It's all-too-easy to make this mistake: a function that has a local array variable is refactored, moving a bit of array manipulation into a new function called with the array as a parameter. So, the question is: is there a "sanitary" macro to detect misuse of the ARRAYSIZE macro in C, preferably at compile-time? In C++ we'd just use a template specialized for array arguments only; in C, it seems we'll need some way to distinguish arrays and pointers. (If I wanted to reject arrays, for instance, I'd just do e.g. (arr=arr, ...) because array assignment is illegal).

    Read the article

  • Image Replacement (JS/JQuery) working in IE but not FF

    - by Sunburnt Ginger
    I have tried multiple solutions for replacing broken images (both JS & jQuery) and all work perfectly with IE but not in FF, is there a reason for this? Are images handled differently in FF that may cause this? JQuery Example: $("img").error(function(){ $(this).unbind("error").attr("src", "nopic.jpg"); }); Javascript Example: (triggered by onError event in img tag) function noimage(img){ img.onerror=""; img.src="nopic.jpg"; return true; } Both of these examples work perfectly in IE but not at all in FF. What gives? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Jquery Scrolling

    - by Rich - Pixel Vector
    I have implemented the following code from this page: http://tympanus.net/codrops/2010/06/02/smooth-vertical-or-horizontal-page-scrolling-with-jquery/ $(document).ready(function() { $('ul.navone li a, ul.navtwo li a,a.toplink, a.bodylink').bind('click',function(event){ var $anchor = $(this); $('html, body, header').stop().animate({ scrollTop: $($anchor.attr('href')).offset().top }, 1500,'easeInOutExpo'); event.preventDefault(); }); }); This all works correctly. However, in my layout I have a fixed header div (i.e. it stays in place when the user scrolls). Therefore I need to set an offset for the scrolling script of 117 pixels. How do I do this please?

    Read the article

  • Toggled() text input field not working in IE6 in Jquery 1.3.2

    - by Michal
    In IE6 after showing() or toggling() an initially hidden text input field it is impossible to enter any text in the box. It is also impossible to focus() on the element. I am using jquery 1.3.2 Here is the code... Any ideas? $(document).ready(function(){ $(".hide").click(function(){ $(".form").toggle(); }) }) and HTML <form> <div class="hide"> Show </div> <div class="form" style="display:none"> <input type="text" name="crap"> </div> </form>

    Read the article

  • jquery specific show buttons on hover

    - by bob
    I have an application creating a bunch of divs through a loop. Each div has the class "product" so it looks like <div class="product"> !.....stuff here ....! <div class="show_on_hover">...buttons here... </div> </div> so there are about 12 of these same divs per page. I would like to hover over a specific one and show the specific "show_on_hover" div which is initially set to display:none. $('.product').hover(function() { $(.show_on_hover).show(); }, function () { $(.show_on_hover).hide(); } ); That is what I have so far but it will show ALL of the .show_on_hovers on the page so I am wondering how to get only the specific one you have moused over to show. This effect is seen on youtube when you mouseover any of the comments, and some comment tools pop up. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Converting keys of an array/object-tree to lowercase

    - by tstenner
    Im currently optimizing a PHP application and found one function being called around 10-20k times, so I'd thought I'd start optimization there. function keysToLower($obj) { if(!is_object($obj) && !is_array($obj)) return $obj; foreach($obj as $key=>$element) { $element=keysToLower($element); if(is_object($obj)) { $obj->{strtolower($key)}=$element; if(!ctype_lower($key)) unset($obj->{$key}); } else if(is_array($obj) && ctype_upper($key)) { $obj[strtolower($key)]=$element; unset($obj[$key]); } } return $obj; } Most of the time is spent in recursive calls (which are quite slow in PHP), but I don't see any way to convert it to a loop. What would you do?

    Read the article

  • Highlight current page in jquery

    - by 3gwebtrain
    Hi, I have the 12 html pages. and all this pages are loads when the left navigation bar link clicked. in this, i need to add a class to the current link, which is clicked and loaded the page. i tried with this: $(function(){ $('#container li a').click(function(){ $('#container li a').removeClass('current'); var pathname = (window.location.pathname.match(/[^\/]+$/)[0]); var currentPage = $(this).attr('href'); if(currentPage==pathname){ $(this).addClass('current'); } else{ alert('wrong'); } // alert(pathname+' currentPage: '+currentPage); }) }) it works, but on page load, the class is removed, i don't know why it's happening.. any help?

    Read the article

  • boost scoped_lock mutex crashes

    - by JahSumbar
    hello, I have protected a std::queue's access functions, push, pop, size, with boost::mutexes and boost::mutex::scoped_lock in these functions from time to time it crashes in a scoped lock the call stack is this: 0 0x0040f005 boost::detail::win32::interlocked_bit_test_and_set include/boost/thread/win32/thread_primitives.hpp 361 1 0x0040e879 boost::detail::basic_timed_mutex::timed_lock include/boost/thread/win32/basic_timed_mutex.hpp 68 2 0x0040e9d3 boost::detail::basic_timed_mutex::lock include/boost/thread/win32/basic_timed_mutex.hpp 64 3 0x0040b96b boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex>::lock include/boost/thread/locks.hpp 349 4 0x0040b998 unique_lock include/boost/thread/locks.hpp 227 5 0x00403837 MyClass::inboxSize - this is my inboxSize function that uses this code: MyClass::inboxSize () { boost::mutex::scoped_lock scoped_lock(m_inboxMutex); return m_inbox.size(); } and the mutex is declared like this: boost::mutex m_inboxMutex; it crashes at the last pasted line in this function: inline bool interlocked_bit_test_and_set(long* x,long bit) { long const value=1<<bit; long old=*x; and x has this value: 0xababac17 Thanks for the help

    Read the article

  • What is the role of `while`-loops in computation expressions in F#?

    - by MizardX
    If you define a While method of the builder-object, you can use while-loops in your computation expressions. The signature of the While method is: member b.While (predicate:unit->bool, body:M<'a>) : M<'a> For comparison, the signature of the For method is: member b.For (items:seq<'a>, body:unit->M<'a>) : M<'a> You should notice that, in the While-method, the body is a simple type, and not a function as in the For method. You can embed some other statements, like let and function-calls inside your computation-expressions, but those can impossibly execute in a while-loop more than once. builder { while foo() do printfn "step" yield bar() } Why is the while-loop not executed more than once, but merely repeated? Why the significant difference from for-loops? Better yet, is there some intended strategy for using while-loops in computation-expressions?

    Read the article

  • Dynamic change of class of <TR> with Jquery

    - by Coronier
    Hi all, This is my first post, and first please forgive me for my poor english. I have a problem I really can't fix: I have a <table> of questions, the first question is visible (class:visible), the others are hidden (class:hidden) $(document).ready(function(){ $('.hidden').hide(); When people click on the first question, I want the second question to appear (and the first question to turn to grey, using a 'done' class). $('.visible:not(.done)').click(function(){ $(this).addClass('done'); $('.hidden:first').toggle(500).removeClass('hidden').addClass('visible'); }) The first question is now done (class:done) and the 2nd question should be the only one to react to a click(), and so on... But it doesn't work: the other <tr> appear only when I click on the 1st <tr>. Can someone give me a hand on this problem ? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Scala : reference is ambiguous (imported twice)

    - by tk
    I want to use a method as a parameter of another method of the same class. I have a class and objects which are companions: class mM(var elem:Matrix){ //apply a function on a dimension rows (1) or cols (2) def app(func:Iterable[Double]=>Double)(dim : Int) : Matrix = { ... } //utility function def logsumexp(): Double = {...} } object mM{ def apply(elem:Matrix):mM={new mM(elem)} def logsumexp(elem:Iterable[Double]): Double ={ this.apply(elem.asInstanceOf[Matrix]).logsumexp() } } Normally I use logsumexp like this mM(matrix).logsumexp but if want to apply it to the rows I can't use mM(matrix).app(mM.logsumexp)(1), I get the error: error: reference to mM is ambiguous; it is imported twice in the same scope by import mM and import mM What is the most elegant solution ? Should I change logsumexp() to another class ? Thanks,=)

    Read the article

  • slideIn and slideOut reduces width of component

    - by shub
    Can someone help me to solve the problem of reducing the width of the component during SlideIn or SlideOut? I am using the Ext JS version 4.1 RC1. Ext.onReady(function () { Ext.create('Ext.container.Viewport', { layout: 'border', items: [{ region: 'north', autoHeight: true, border: false, margins: '0 0 5 0', items: [{ xtype: 'container', id: 'con_notification-box', cls: 'notification-box', hidden: true, border: true, width: 500, height: 0, style: { position: 'fixed', minHeight: '75px !important', left: '50%', marginLeft: '-250px', zIndex: '999999', backgroundColor: 'white' }, items:[{ xtype: 'container', html: '<p>Insert your information text here.</p>' },{ xtype: 'container', id: 'con_application-close', cls: 'notification-close', html: '<br />Close' }] },{ xtype: 'container', html: '<h1 class="x-panel-header">Your title</h1>' }] }] }); var con_notification_box = Ext.getCmp('con_notification-box').getEl(); con_notification_box.slideIn('t', { easing: 'easeOut', duration: 500 }); Ext.getCmp('con_application-close').getEl().on('click',function(){ con_notification_box.slideOut('t', { duration: 2000 }); }); }); I'd be very grateful if you could help me. Kind regards, shub

    Read the article

  • Using Classes / OOP in PHP

    - by Alex Demchak
    I'm pretty proficient with PHP, outside of OOP - which I am just now starting to jump in to. I've been watching videos and reading tutorials, but they are all still pretty confusing... If I have FILE 1 (class.time.php) class Time { function GetTime(){ $time = date('H:i:s'); printf($time); } } and then in a nother php page I've got FILE 2 (page.php) I can do include('class.time.php'); and then anywhere in this page I can then do $time = new Time; //Calling the class and setting the class to a variable $time->GetTime(); //This is BASICALLY saying (run the 'GetTime' function in the 'Time Class' My main question is, is the comment above (This is BASICALLY saying.....) correct? or is there a better way to think of it?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708  | Next Page >