Search Results

Search found 53991 results on 2160 pages for 'asp net 4'.

Page 706/2160 | < Previous Page | 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713  | Next Page >

  • Getting SharePoint absolute site url

    - by Francis
    I need to get the current absolute url of my site from inside an aspx page (no codebehind). I tried $SPUrl, but it get's converted into a relative url. <asp:Literal runat="server" text="<% $SPUrl:~Site/mypage.aspx %>" /> results in "/mypage.aspx". It's important that I get the full absolute url starting with "http://". <asp:Literal runat="server" text="<% $SPUrl:~SiteCollection/mypage.aspx %>" /> does the same. The goal is to get this url: "http://myspweb.com/mypage.aspx" as result.

    Read the article

  • The href value of the Html anchor tag is rendering weird

    - by franko_camron
    I want to assign dynamically the href value depending of certain things, I thing is important to mention that I have a Master Page, url routing and I am assigning absolute paths (like http://www.stackoverflow.com/questions/...). I've tried the following: <a href="<%= DynamicURL%>">testing urls</a> <asp:HyperLink runat="server" ID="hpLink">this teset brouw</asp:HyperLink> and in code behind hpLink.NavigateUrl = "http://www.someurl.com/morepath/morethisngs"; I have also tried this <a runat="server" id="aAccesories">Testing ...</a> and in code behind I do this: aAccesorios.HRef = "http://www.someurl.com/morepath/morethisngs"; what ever I try when I see the html source code the links render like this: http://localhost:10027/projectTest/\www.someurl.com/morepath/morethisngs so I cant create absolute paths or absolute URLS, doesnt matter what I tried, this is weird isnt it? i adds the domain to the urls and then it removes the http:// then it adds the path I wanted hope you can help me, thanks!

    Read the article

  • What are the requirements of a collection type when model binding?

    - by Richard Ev
    I have been reviewing model binding with collections, specifically going through this article http://weblogs.asp.net/nmarun/archive/2010/03/13/asp-net-mvc-2-model-binding-for-a-collection.aspx However, the model I would like to use in my code does not implement collections using generic lists. Instead it uses its own collection classes, which inherit from a custom generic collection base class, the declaration of which is public abstract class CollectionBase<T> : IEnumerable<T> The collections in my POSTed action method are all non-null, but contain no elements. Can anyone advise?

    Read the article

  • Disabling identity (auto-incrementing) on integer primary key using code first

    - by gw0
    I am using code first approach in a ASP.NET MVC 3 application and all integer primary keys in models (public int Id { get; set; }) are by default configured as an identity with auto-incrementing. How to disable this and enable a way to manually enter the integer for the primary key? The actual situation is that the Id integers have a special meaning and I would therefore like to have them choosable at creation and later editable. It would be ideal if in case the integer is not given at creation time it is auto-incremented, else the specified value is used. But editable primary fields is my primary need. Is there any way to do this elegantly in ASP.NET MVC 3?

    Read the article

  • NavigateUrl="#" becomes href="SubFolder/#"??

    - by jamietre
    This isn't exactly Fermat's last theorem, but it keeps coming back to annoy me like an unpaid phone bill from college. Sometimes I want to create a HyperLink that does not cause a postback, so I want the target url to be #. When the markup happens to be from a UserControl in a subfolder, / |- Home.aspx (uses UC.ascx) |- Sub |- UC.ascx the URL is rewritten with a relative path, e.g. <asp:HyperLink runat="server" NavigateUrl="#" >Click Me!</asp:HyperLink> becomes <a href="SubFolder/#">Click Me!</a> Which is, unfortunately, wrong. Obviously I can get around this by not using a server control, but it seems stupid. Can this be avoided? The point here is I will add a click event with jQuery or in code-behind, and I never want it to cause a postback, but I want it to be a hyperlink for CSS reasons.

    Read the article

  • implement jquery Plugin add method Validation

    - by Eyla
    I have a problem to use jquery Plugin/Validation. I want to add a method and follow the documentation but I think I still missing some thing. First I add the method but I think I have a problem to implement it. please check my code and advice me. <script src="js/jquery-1.4.1.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="js/jquery.validate.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { jQuery.validator.addMethod("domain", function(value, element) { return this.optional(element) || /^http:\/\/yahoo.com/.test(value); }, "Please specify the correct domain for your documents"); $("#aspForm").validate(); }); <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox1" runat="server" CssClass="domain" ></asp:TextBox> </script>

    Read the article

  • SQL SELECT INSERTed data from Table

    - by Noam Smadja
    its in ASP Classic. MS-Access DB. i do: INSERT INTO Orders (userId) VALUES (123)" what i want to retrieve is orderNumber from that row. its an auto-increment number. so i did: SELECT orderNumber FROM Orders WHERE userId=123 but since it is on the same page, the SELECT returns: Either BOF or EOF is True, or the current record has been deleted. Requested operation requires a current record. i've seen somewhere RETURNING orderNumber as variable but it was for oracle and i dont know how to implement it into my asp :( set addOrder = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Command") addOrder.ActiveConnection = MM_KerenDB_STRING addOrder.CommandText = "INSERT INTO Orders (userId) VALUES ("&userId&")" addOrder.CommandType = 1 addOrder.CommandTimeout = 0 addOrder.Prepared = true addOrder.Execute() Dim getOrderNumber Set getOrderNumber = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Recordset") getOrderNumber.ActiveConnection = MM_KerenDB_STRING getOrderNumber.Source = "SELECT orderNumber FROM Orders WHERE userId=" & userId getOrderNumber.CursorType = 0 getOrderNumber.CursorLocation = 2 getOrderNumber.LockType = 1 getOrderNumber.Open() session("orderNumber") = getOrderNumber.Fields.Item("orderNumber").value

    Read the article

  • Include in enity framework 4

    - by molgan
    Hello I've been using enity framework that came with 3.5sp. And now I've redone things for enityframework 4 and asp.net mvc 2. I've come across something (which worked in my previous version and asp.net mvc 1.0). I have this: public IQueryable<Booking> GetBookings() { return from b in _entities.Bookings.Include("BookingObject") select b; } And in my controller I have: return View("Index", new BookingsViewModel { Bookings = _br.GetBookings().ByDay(DateTime.Today) }); And it doesnt seem to include the "BookingObject"-entity, so I can type like <%= Model.Bookings.BookingObject.BookingObjectName %> in my view. What might be missing here? Do I need to turn something on in the diagram for it to include entities or? /M

    Read the article

  • Using ExecuteQuery() with entity framework, entity class.

    - by sfreelander
    I am trying to jump from ASP Classic to asp.net. I have followed tutorials to get Entity Framework and LINQ to connect to my test database, but I am having difficulties figuring out ExecuteQuery(). I believe the problem is that I need an "entity class" for my database, but I can't figure out how to do it. Here is my simple code: Dim db as New TestModel.TestEntity Dim results AS IEnumerable(OF ???) = db.ExecuteQuery(Of ???)("Select * from Table1") From the microsoft example site, they use an entity class called Customers, but I don't understand what that means.

    Read the article

  • <Control>.Focus() from server side doesn't scroll into view

    - by George
    Custom Validation Control: <asp:CustomValidator ID="valSex" runat="server" ErrorMessage="1.2 &lt;b&gt;Sex&lt;/b&gt; not specified" EnableClientScript="true" ClientValidationFunction="ValidateSex" SetFocusOnError="True">Selection required</asp:CustomValidator> Client Side validation routine: function ValidateSex(source, args) { var optMale = document.getElementById("<%=optMale.ClientID %>"); var optFemale = document.getElementById("<%=optFemale.ClientID %>"); if (!optMale.checked && !optFemale.checked) { args.IsValid = false; optMale.focus(); } else args.IsValid = true; } When the page is submitted and Sex is not specified, focus is set but the 2 radio buttons are not quite in view, vertical scrolling is required to bring them into view. Shouldn't the Focus() method have brought the focus control into view?

    Read the article

  • ModalPopupExtender with thmbnail (problem in javascript)

    - by arny
    this is the code,it is not working in Firefox,Chrome,to show full size image unless user click on image for couple of times, I basically replace the thmbnail image with full size image in javascript, here is my code, TransitionDuration="50" FramesPerSecond="40" RequireOpenedPane="false" SelectedIndex="-1" SuppressHeaderPostbacks="true" HeaderCssClass="accordionHeader" ContentCssClass="accordionContent" OnItemDataBound="Accordion1_ItemDataBound" OnItemCommand="Accordion1_ItemCommand" ' ' Width="90px" Height="70px" onclick="togglePopupImage2(this);" CssClass="thumbnail" BorderColor="Navy" BorderStyle="Solid" BorderWidth="1" <table> <tr> <td style="background-color: #2E4d7B; height: 15px; color: White; font: arial bold 12px; padding: 5px"> <label id="imgText" runat="server"> </label> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <asp:Image ID="imgPopup" CssClass="imgpopup" runat="server" /> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center" style="background-color: #2E4d7B; height: 25px;"> <asp:Button ID="btnCancel" runat="server" Text="Close" CssClass="closeimage"/> </td> </tr> </table> </asp:Panel> And javascript code: function togglePopupImage2(thumbnail2) { var imageurl = thumbnail2.src; var temp = new Array(); temp = imageurl.split('.'); var imagepopup = temp[0].substring(0, temp[0].length - 3) + "." + temp[1]; var img = new Image(); img.src = imagepopup; $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_UserInterfaceID').style.visibility = 'visible'; $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_imgPopup').src = img.src; //alert(img.src); if (img.width > 750) { if (screen.width == '1024' || screen.width == '800') { $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_imgPopup').width = 550; //to show the picture in 1024 or 800 resolutions } else { $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_imgPopup').width = 750; } } else { $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_imgPopup').width = img.width; } if (img.height > 568) { if (screen.width == '1024' || screen.width == '800') { $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_imgPopup').height = 350; //to show the picture in 1024 or 800 resolutions } else { $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_imgPopup').height = 568; } } else { $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_imgPopup').height = img.height; } // } } Please find the error and let me know what is the right way to achieve this? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • I get `System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox` instead of TextBox value

    - by Anna T
    Gooday. Could you help me figure out please why I get this: System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox on Label1: DataListItem item = DataList1.Items[0]; TextBox nume = (TextBox)item.FindControl("numeTb"); Label1.Text = nume.ToString(); I specify that the numeTb element is put like this in the ASPX file: <asp:TextBox ID="numeTb" runat="server" Width="400px" Text='<%# Eval("nume") %>' DataTextField="nume" DataValueField="nume"></asp:TextBox> I just added the DataTextField bits thinking might help, but no. Thank you!

    Read the article

  • URL Routing to Default Page

    - by ewitkows
    Hi everyone, I have an asp.net 4.0 web forms app setup with url rereouting. In development, my app's URL looks perfect. I have a page called enrollnow.aspx that responds to the routing, so if I type in localhost/enrollnow/abc, my app responds as expected. Once promoted into my staging environment however, the URL is off. I have a domain, and a virtual dir created off of my domain called "enrollnow". So basically, my URL outside of development is: mydomain.com/enrollnow/enrollnow/abc - where the first enrollnow is the directory, the second enrollnow is the page name, and the abc is my route value. Is there any way I can have the "default page" respond, so the second enrollnow (which is enrollnow.asp) isnt required? Perhaps I can rename my enrollnow.aspx page to default.aspx, or I can change the mapping in my routetable? Heres my routetable, incase that helps. thanks! Routetable: RouteTable.Routes.Add("PURLRoute", New Route("EnrollNow/{PURL_ID}", New PageRouteHandler("~/EnrollNow.aspx")))

    Read the article

  • can I debug my web project and wcf project on same vs 2008 instance ?

    - by dotnetcoder
    I have two projects in my solution   1- asp.net web project.   2- wcf serivce project.   3- other common projects between two listed above Current on the local dev machine I have to run two visual studio instance to run both projects in debug mode. That makes the system run out of resources as these projects share some other project in the soultion which are heavy in files. Is there a way i can hookup the wcf project on a sinlge visual stodio instance and also be able to debug my asp.net web project. ? I do not want to combine the web and wcf project in to one. Have already considred this option. thanks for sharing your thoughts in advance.

    Read the article

  • Controller should not have domain logic. How faithful should one adhere to this tenet?

    - by Hao
    Quoting from page 49 of Pro ASP.NET MVC book It is certainly possible to put domain logic into a controller, even though you shouldn’t, just because it seems like it will work anyway. It’s easy to avoid this if you imagine that you have multiple UI technologies (e.g., an ASP.NET MVC application plus a native iPhone application) operating on the same underlying business domain layer (and maybe one day you will!). With this in mind, it’s clear that you don’t want to put domain logic into any of the UI layers. Why he seems to contradict himself on page 172? [HttpPost] public ActionResult CheckOut(Cart cart, ShippingDetails shippingDetails) { // Empty carts can't be checked out if (cart.Lines.Count == 0) ModelState.AddModelError("Cart", "Sorry, your cart is empty!"); if (ModelState.IsValid) { orderSubmitter.SubmitOrder(cart, shippingDetails); cart.Clear(); return View("Completed"); } else // Something was invalid return View(shippingDetails); } Related to: How to avoid placing domain logic in controller?

    Read the article

  • Is it Possible to Write in a DropdownList or listbox?

    - by user280048
    work on Asp.Net C# vs08. I was wondering if it is possible to write in a dropdownlist or listbox such that if somebody does not want to select from the dropdownlist or listbox, he/she can type the value and if the value exist in the dropdownlist/listbox, it autofills. The person may then select it. If this is not possible in ASP.NET, would anybody know of another control that can be used for the same purpose and how? what I really need is how to allow the writting on the DropDownList, please someone help me!. Thank you very much.

    Read the article

  • Permission based access control

    - by jellysaini
    I am trying to implement permission based access control in ASP.NET. To implement this I have created some database tables that hold all the information about which roles are assigned what permissions and which roles are assigned to what user. I am checking the permissions in the business access layer. Right now I have created a method which checks the permissions of the user. If the user has permissions then okay otherwise it redirects to another page. I want to know if the following things are possible? class User { [PremissionCheck(UserID,ObjectName,OperationName)] public DataTable GetUser() { //coding for user } } I have seen it in MVC3. Can I Create it in ASP.NET? If yes then how can I implement it?

    Read the article

  • Redirect issues

    - by pinniger
    Whoever wrote the navigation for the site I’m currently working on (classic asp) points the navigation links to a folder, then inside to folder has an index.asp file, so the urls will look something like this www.mysite.com/myfolder/mysubfolder Now, when watch the page load using httpfox, I notice that the first entry is a 302 redirect to the same address with a “/” on the end, so www.mysite.com/myfolder gets redirected to www.mysite.com/myfolder/ (note the / on the end). I’m not to worried that it’s a 302 since its in the admin section of the site, but when I forward the host headers from ISA server, for an https request, its being redirected from https://www.mysite.com/myfolder to http://www.mysite.com:443/myfolder/ and causing all kinds of problems. Anyway, I can’t seem to find any code making this redirect happen, so does IIS 6 do this because the url points to a folder? Or do I need to comb through the code more closely?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713  | Next Page >