Search Results

Search found 2556 results on 103 pages for 'sleep deprivation ninja'.

Page 71/103 | < Previous Page | 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78  | Next Page >

• iPhone Notifications is possible to...

  - by user331769

  Hi to all, I read more post regarding iPhone notification, and I have a simple question.... Where a device receive a notification (so I can display a message contains the message notificatio ti advise the user). I understand that message is managed by the application. The question is: ...when my application receive the notification is it possible to start it? Or in other world the application became run when receive the notification or it simple became active only to manage the message and at the end of notification management the app return to sleep? The main application windows is opened on the device ? Many thanks in advance Lukenukem Ciao

  Read the article

• passing parameter to dowork?

  - by safi

  How can i Pass parameter to background_DoWork? public void bgw1_DoWork(Object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e) { make_zip_file argumentest = e.Argument as make_zip_file; Thread.Sleep(100); argumentest.return_path = argumentest.Makezipfile(files, IsOriginal); e.Result = argumentest; } i need to pass files,isOrginal parameter...? i am calling this method: public string run_async() { bgw1.DoWork += bgw1_DoWork; bgw1.RunWorkerCompleted += bgw1_RunWorkerCompleted; make_zip_file mzf2 = new make_zip_file(); bgw1.RunWorkerAsync(); return return_path; }

  Read the article

• How to prevent GUI blocking?

  - by Kovu

  Hi, I have a timer that ticks every 3 seconds. If the timer found something a messagebox will show. Then the timer should wait 30 seconds, before he show again the messagebox (the user of course must have time to react). How can I handle this? I tried a Thread.Sleep(30000), but the GUI blocks of course. My other Idea is a second timer that will be activated after the first ticks and reactivate the first timer in the tick-method. So: t1 tick - msg box - after click - t2 enable (30 sec tick) - t2 tick, enable t1 But I think thats not a good idea, is there a better way?

  Read the article

• Simple Thread Programming

  - by mike

  I have started to play with threads in c#, but need now help, here is my code: public partial class Form1 : Form { public Form1() { InitializeComponent(); DoCount(); } public void DoCount() { for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) { objTextBox.Text = i.ToString(); Thread.Sleep(100); } } } its a simple win forms with a textbox, i want to see the "counting", but as you see in my code, the textbox shows me 99, it count till 99 and then shows up.. i`ll think, i have to manage this in a new thread but dont know how!

  Read the article

• Threaded application sleeps with other application

  - by DeeD

  I have a weird problem with my threaded software. I start 2 instances of the software. Each instance has 2 threads, one thread creates a socket to use, and the other one is uses the socket for communication. When one of the threads in one instance calls sleep(3), the other threads in the the other instance sleeps too. And the weirdest thing is that when I rebooted the computer, it works the first time, but after trying a second time, it sleeps like described. How is this possible? Is it using some shared resource?

  Read the article

• pthread_exit return value

  - by Manty

  This is surprising for me. void * thread_func(void *arg) { pthread_exit(&ret); } int main(void) { pthread_t thr; int *exit_status; pthread_create(&thr, NULL, thread_func, NULL); sleep(2); pthread_join(thr, (void **)&exit_status); printf("value of exit status - %d\n", *exit_status); ret = 20; pthread_join(thr, (void **)&exit_status); printf("value of exit status - %d\n", *exit_status); return 0; } The output is value of exit status - 50 value of exit status - 20 I was expecting both the times the exit_status would be the actual exit value(50 in my case) of the thread. Instead it is just returning the value of the global variable which I used for pthread_exit. Is it not a bug?

  Read the article

• PHP file modification time in milliseconds

  - by Steven Rosato

  I there, I am currently writing a unit test which asserts that a file did not get modified. The test code execution takes less than one second and therefore I would like to know if it is possible to retrieve the file modification time in milliseconds. filemtime() function returns the UNIX timestamp in seconds. My current solution is using the sleep(1) function which will assure me that 1 second passed before checking if it was modified or not. I don't like that solution since it slows down the test by a great deal. I cannot assert the content equality via get_file_contents() since the data that can be rewritten would be the same. I am guessing it is impossible, is it?

  Read the article

• is there a flag "M_FAST" in FreeBSD kernel for Malloc Call ?

  - by KaluSingh Gabbar

  if you know there is one, can you let me know what its for ? if not please say so : ) thanks. Signature : void * malloc(unsigned long size, struct malloc_type type, int flags); for example. other flags are... M_ZERO Causes the allocated memory to be set to all zeros. M_WAITOK Indicates that it is OK to wait for resources. If the request cannot be immediately fulfilled, the current process is put to sleep to wait for resources to be released by other processes. The malloc(), realloc(), and reallocf() functions cannot return NULL if M_WAITOK is specified.** This is the root of my confusion EDIT: The clarification for M_FAST is made in my answer below.

  Read the article

• "tail -f" alternate which doesn't scroll the terminal window

  - by Jagtesh Chadha

  I want to check a file at continuous intervals for contents which keep changing. "tail -f" doesn't suffice as the file doesn't grow in size. I could use a simple while loop in bash to the same effect: while [ 1 ]; do cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/state ; sleep 10; done It works, although it has the unwanted effect of scrolling my terminal window. So now I'm wondering, is there a linux/shell command that would display the output of this file without scrolling the terminal?

  Read the article

• Capture subprocess output

  - by schneck

  Hi there, I learned that when executing commands in Python, I should use subprocess. What I'm trying to achieve is to encode a file via ffmpeg and observe the program output until the file is done. Ffmpeg logs the progress to stderr. If I try something like this: child = subprocess.Popen(command, shell=True, stderr=subprocess.PIPE) complete = False while not complete: stderr = child.communicate() # Get progress print "Progress here later" if child.poll() is not None: complete = True time.sleep(2) the programm does not continue after calling child.communicate() and waits for the command to complete. Is there any other way to follow the output?

  Read the article

• Delay in for loop while playing mp3 file C#

  - by daniyalahmad

  I want to give delay in for loop, While in for loop there is mp3 file is playing. What I actually want to do, that every clip plays after 2 sec. There are total 10 clips. Here is my code for (int i=1; i < 10; i++) { System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000); WMPLib.WindowsMediaPlayer wplayer = new WMPLib.WindowsMediaPlayer(); wplayer.URL = @"D:\Project C#\A-Z\" + i + ".mp3"; }

  Read the article

• networkstream always empty!

  - by ALEX

  hey I'm writing on an Server-Client program but when my client sends something, it never reaches my server! I'm sending like this: public void Send(string s) { char[] chars = s.ToCharArray(); byte[] bytes = chars.CharToByte(); nstream.Write(bytes, 0, bytes.Length); nstream.Flush(); } and Receiving in a background thread like this void CheckIncoming(object dd) { RecievedDelegate d = (RecievedDelegate)dd; try { while (true) { List<byte> bytelist = new List<byte>(); System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000); int ssss; ssss = nstream.ReadByte(); if (ssss > 1) { System.Diagnostics.Debugger.Break(); } if (bytelist.Count != 0) { d.Invoke(bytelist.ToArray()); } } } catch (Exception exp) { MSGBOX("ERROR:\n" + exp.Message); } } the ssss int is never 1 whats happening here???

  Read the article

• PHP cURL loading delay

  - by lasquarte

  Hello. My problem is, I need to cURL-load a page that uses Ajax-based search, to get results of that search. And I need to organize a delay between curl_exec() and value returning. In other words, I need to execute curl_exec() for no less than 5 seconds. sleep() seems to stop curl execution and does not work. Will greatly appreciate any hint or clue UPD I don't know how, but on this page http://vkontakte.ru/gsearch.php?section=video&q=sample&name=1, but it requires an account to access curl DOES capture the search made by ajax. But if page tooks too long to load, Ajax returns "action was too fast" error. So I just need to prolong curl execution. Sorry if being unclear.

  Read the article

• Delays in ActionScript (Flash)? Alternatives to setInterval

  - by yar

  While setInterval is handy, it's kind of limiting. Every time I want to add a Tween I have to add a new method. I do not want to alter the structure of my code just to add in some delays. Isn't there any way to say this without making methods for A and B? // do A // wait N seconds // do B I don't want to use a while loop with Dates because I think it will be blocking. Isn't there anything like Thread.sleep in ActionScript?

  Read the article

• Waiting for ServerSocket accept() to put socket into "listen" mode

  - by inazaruk

  I need a simple client-server communication in order to implement unit-test. My steps: Create server thread Wait for server thread to put server socket into listen mode ( serverSocket.accept() ) Create client Make some request, verify responses Basically, I have a problem with step #2. I can't find a way to signal me when server socket is put to "listen" state. An asynchronous call to "accept" will do in this case, but java doesn't support this (it seems to support only asynchronous channels and those are incompatible with "accept()" method according to documentation). Of cause I can put a simple "sleep", but that is not really a solution for production code. So, to summarize, I need to detect when ServerSocket has been put into listen mode without using sleeps and/or polling.

  Read the article

• Perform tasks with delay, without delaying web response (ASP.NET)

  - by Tomas Lycken

  I'm working on a feature that needs to send two text messages with a 30 second delay, and it is crucial that both text messages are sent. Currently, this feature is built with ajax requests, that are sent with a 30 second javascript delay, but since this requires the user to have his browser open and left on the same page for at least 30 seconds, it is not a method I like. Instead, I have tried to solve this with threading. This is what I've done: Public Shared Sub Larma() Dim thread As New System.Threading.Thread(AddressOf Larma_Thread) thread.Start() End Sub Private Shared Sub Larma_Thread() StartaLarm() Thread.Sleep(1000 * 30) StoppaLarm() End Sub A web handler calls Larma(), and StartaLarm() and StoppaLarm() are the methods that send the first and second text messages respectively. However, I only get the first text message delivered - the second is never sent. Am I doing something wrong here? I have no deep understanding of how threading works in ASP.NET, so please let me know how to accomplish this.

  Read the article

• Will the next iPhone Simulator be able to simulate the high resolution of iPhone 4?

  - by dontWatchMyProfile

  As a follow-up to this question, the next one is: Will we be able to simulate our interfaces how they look on the new high resolution display, even without owning an iPhone 4? I guess that there is a formula that we can use to calculate the exact needed distance between our monitors and our eyes, to achieve the exact same visual effect of the Retina Display. This would help a lot to get things right. The first thing we need is an high resolution iPhone Simulator. I can't get any sleep until I know.

  Read the article

• Pass off execution to different/specific thread in Java

  - by Mike

  I have about 4 threads. One thread keeps checking some data that the other thread is updating. The others are doing some processing in the background. All have been started at this point. My question is when the checking thread sees that the data has not been updated yet I currently sleep for a little bit but is there any way for me to tell the system to back to executing the thread that does the updating? That or is there any way I can put something like a listener on the data(a String) and once its updated an event will fire that will do what it needs to do? I tried using yield() and it seemed to just keep returning to the thread I called yield() from. Thanks

  Read the article

• What happens if you break out of a Lock() statement?

  - by cyclotis04

  I'm writing a program which listens to an incoming TcpClient and handles data when it arrives. The Listen() method is run on a separate thread within the component, so it needs to be threadsafe. If I break out of a do while loop while I'm within a lock() statement, will the lock be released? If not, how do I accomplish this? Thanks! (Any other advice on the subject of Asynchronous TCP Sockets is welcome as well.) private void Listen() { do { lock (_client) { if (!_client.Connected) break; lock (_stateLock) { if (!_listening) break; if (_client.GetStream().DataAvailable) HandleData(); } } Thread.Sleep(0); } while (true); }

  Read the article

• Break the limit of threading, segmentation fault

  - by user353573

  use pthread_create to create limited number of threads running concurrently Successfully compile and run However, after adding function pointer array to run the function, Segmentation fault Where is wrong? workserver number: 0 Segmentation fault void* workserver(void arg) { int status; while(true) { printf("workserver number: %d\n", (int)arg); ( job_queue[(int)arg])(); sleep(3); status = pthread_mutex_lock(&data.mutex); if(status != 0) printf("%d lock mutex", status); data.value = 1; status = pthread_cond_signal(&data.cond); if(status != 0) printf("%d signal condition", status); status = pthread_mutex_unlock(&data.mutex); if(status != 0) printf("%d unlock mutex", status); } }

  Read the article

• debug assertion fail

  - by Kolt

  I have a program that runs correctly if I start it manually. However, if I try to add a registry key to start it automatically during startup, I get this error: Debug assertion failed (str!=null) fprintf.c line:55 I tried to add Sleep(20000) before anything hapens, but same error. here`s the code: main() { FILE* filetowrite; filetowrite = fopen("textfile.txt", "a+"); writefunction(filetowrite); } int writefunction(FILE* filetowrite) { fprintf(filetowrite, "%s", "\n\n"); ... } I also tried with passing filename as char* and opening it in wrtiefunction(), but same error.

  Read the article

• what to use for repetitive (daily, weekly, monthly) tasks ? Workflows, Windows Services, something e

  - by mare

  I've been writing Windows Services for a while and they always seem to work fine for things that need to run every day, few times a week, once a month, etc. but I've been lately thinking about going with Windows Workflow Foundation. However, I am unsure how would they run on a server without some container application (for instance SharePoint)? I worked with Sharepoint workflows before and I always had huge problems, at first with the bugs in the workflow architecture implementation (the problems with sleep and delay) and later when they eventually started to work, they were difficult to manage and change. On the other hand Windows Services were always quite easy to implement, easy to create a setup for them and install them and they were always quite resilient (they were often working for months without crashing or something else going wrong). What do you recommend? Please bear in mind we are working in .NET (version is of no problem, if 4.0 brings something new on this subject, we can use it).

  Read the article

• C# background worker while loop

  - by Mike

  What i'm trying to create is a background worker that executes a few processes every 30seconds. But I want this while loop to execute for as long as the program is launched. here is what I am using: private void watcherprocess1() { backgroundWorker1.RunWorkerAsync(); } private void backgroundWorker1_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e) { while( Thread.Sleep(30000); specficView2(); makeFormlist2(); populateListview2(); } My main issue is ai can think of a good while loop to keep this running

  Read the article

• Ruby ActiveRecord + Mongrel going slow

  - by stel

  I have a class like this: class Router :: Mongrel::HttpHandler def process(req, res) status, header, body = [200, {"Content-type"="text/html"}, Model.all.to_xml] res.start(status) do |head, out| header.each_pair { |key, value| head[key] = value } out.write body end end end It's an server and I use an ActiveResource front end on the other side. Every 3rd request is very slow (about 5 seconds, 1st and 2nd is ok, about 0.01 sec). The problem in Model.all.to_xml (it is ActiveRecord - SQLite). Why it is too slow? It only happens when I use it in Mongrel::HttpHandler.. This 100.times do a = Time.now Car.all.to_xml puts "#{Time.now - a}" sleep(1) end is always works good.

  Read the article

• Can this loop take out 100% CPU?

  - by Nitesh Panchal

  Hello, I created a chat application and seems to work just fine except that it takes up 100% cpu. Can this loop take out 100% Cpu? If yes, then what do i do to overcome it? @Override public void run(){ try { _objServerSocket = new ServerSocket(17001, 500); while (true) { try { initializeConnection(); addNewChatClient(); Thread.sleep(1000); } catch (Exception ex) { } } } catch (IOException ex) { System.out.println(ex.getCause() + "\n"+ ex.getMessage() + "\n" + ex.getStackTrace()); } } Thanks in advance :)

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78  | Next Page >