Search Results

Search found 54955 results on 2199 pages for 'asp net roles'.

Page 714/2199 | < Previous Page | 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721  | Next Page >

  • How to display a date time in 16 Nov 2011 15:12 format

    - by Mark
    I have a grid view column in which I give the datefomat as dd MMM yyyy HH:mm and in code behind databound I change the time, the same time in database is not shown in the gridview, because of that the date is not displayed in 16 Nov 2011 15:12 format, it is displayed in 16/11/2011 15:12 format, how can i display it in 16 Nov 2011 15:12 format asp <asp:BoundField DataField="SendDate" ItemStyle-Width="15%" HeaderText="Sent At" DataFormatString="{0:dd MMM yyyy HH:mm}" SortExpression="SendDate" /> c# double timeDifference = Convert.ToDouble(Session["utimezone"].ToString()); e.Row.Cells[5].Text = Convert.ToString(senddate.AddMinutes(timeDifference * 60));

    Read the article

  • jquery datepicker and aspx TextBox visible problem

    - by senzacionale
    $(".inputTypeDate").datepicker({ dateFormat: "dd.mm.yy", changeMonth: true, changeYear: true }); <asp:TextBox ID="txtBirthday" runat="server" CssClass="inputTypeDate" Visible="false" ValidationGroup="urgent"></asp:TextBox> in aspx we have some component set to Visible="false" then we change visibility to true. But jquery datepicker calendar does not work in this component. If Visible="true" by default then works. Why and how to fix that. I think that problem is in changing visibility.

    Read the article

  • Gridview item template refresh

    - by morsanu
    <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Quantity" ItemStyle-HorizontalAlign="Left" HeaderStyle-HorizontalAlign="Left"> <ItemTemplate> <%#GetQuantityRemaining((int) Eval("Id")) %> </ItemTemplate> <HeaderStyle HorizontalAlign="Left"></HeaderStyle> <ItemStyle HorizontalAlign="Left"></ItemStyle> </asp:TemplateField> Every time the user clicks on some buttons or modifies some fields, I need to update this field, calling the GetQuantityRemaining method again. Is there a way to do that?

    Read the article

  • Scrolling Panel Printing Issue

    - by Paul
    Hi I have a site where we have the content in scrolling panels to make it neater and line up. The issue comes when trying to print the contents of my panel hidden by the scroll. Here is my panel <asp:Panel Height="400px" ID="pnlContent" class="ContentPanel ScrollBars="Vertical" runat="server" > <!-- Content bla bla bla --> </asp:Panel> Here is my media="print" style sheet code for the ContentPanel .ContentScroller { overflow:visible; } The overflow:visible does not seem to remover the ScrollBars="Vertical" Any ideas on how to get this hidden content to print?

    Read the article

  • NavigateUrl="#" becomes href="SubFolder/#"??

    - by jamietre
    This isn't exactly Fermat's last theorem, but it keeps coming back to annoy me like an unpaid phone bill from college. Sometimes I want to create a HyperLink that does not cause a postback, so I want the target url to be #. When the markup happens to be from a UserControl in a subfolder, / |- Home.aspx (uses UC.ascx) |- Sub |- UC.ascx the URL is rewritten with a relative path, e.g. <asp:HyperLink runat="server" NavigateUrl="#" >Click Me!</asp:HyperLink> becomes <a href="SubFolder/#">Click Me!</a> Which is, unfortunately, wrong. Obviously I can get around this by not using a server control, but it seems stupid. Can this be avoided? The point here is I will add a click event with jQuery or in code-behind, and I never want it to cause a postback, but I want it to be a hyperlink for CSS reasons.

    Read the article

  • implement jquery Plugin add method Validation

    - by Eyla
    I have a problem to use jquery Plugin/Validation. I want to add a method and follow the documentation but I think I still missing some thing. First I add the method but I think I have a problem to implement it. please check my code and advice me. <script src="js/jquery-1.4.1.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="js/jquery.validate.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { jQuery.validator.addMethod("domain", function(value, element) { return this.optional(element) || /^http:\/\/yahoo.com/.test(value); }, "Please specify the correct domain for your documents"); $("#aspForm").validate(); }); <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox1" runat="server" CssClass="domain" ></asp:TextBox> </script>

    Read the article

  • The href value of the Html anchor tag is rendering weird

    - by franko_camron
    I want to assign dynamically the href value depending of certain things, I thing is important to mention that I have a Master Page, url routing and I am assigning absolute paths (like http://www.stackoverflow.com/questions/...). I've tried the following: <a href="<%= DynamicURL%>">testing urls</a> <asp:HyperLink runat="server" ID="hpLink">this teset brouw</asp:HyperLink> and in code behind hpLink.NavigateUrl = "http://www.someurl.com/morepath/morethisngs"; I have also tried this <a runat="server" id="aAccesories">Testing ...</a> and in code behind I do this: aAccesorios.HRef = "http://www.someurl.com/morepath/morethisngs"; what ever I try when I see the html source code the links render like this: http://localhost:10027/projectTest/\www.someurl.com/morepath/morethisngs so I cant create absolute paths or absolute URLS, doesnt matter what I tried, this is weird isnt it? i adds the domain to the urls and then it removes the http:// then it adds the path I wanted hope you can help me, thanks!

    Read the article

  • Best way to validate currency input?

    - by Abe Miessler
    I have created the TextBox and CompareValidator below which I thought would allow input in the following forms: 5 5.00 $5.00 Unfortunately it's not allowing the version with the dollar sign in it. What is the point of doing a type check against currency if you don't allow the dollar sign? Is there a way to allow this symbol? <asp:TextBox ID="tb_CostShare" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("CostShare", "{0:$0.00}")%>' CausesValidation="true" /> <asp:CompareValidator ID="vld_CostShare" runat="server" ControlToValidate="tb_CostShare" Operator="DataTypeCheck" Type="Currency" ValidationGroup="vld" ErrorMessage="You must enter a dollar amount for 'Cost Share'." />

    Read the article

  • What are the requirements of a collection type when model binding?

    - by Richard Ev
    I have been reviewing model binding with collections, specifically going through this article http://weblogs.asp.net/nmarun/archive/2010/03/13/asp-net-mvc-2-model-binding-for-a-collection.aspx However, the model I would like to use in my code does not implement collections using generic lists. Instead it uses its own collection classes, which inherit from a custom generic collection base class, the declaration of which is public abstract class CollectionBase<T> : IEnumerable<T> The collections in my POSTed action method are all non-null, but contain no elements. Can anyone advise?

    Read the article

  • Forced to use too many hidden fields; looking for an alternative approach

    - by harisri786
    I am looking for a better approach to do this. I have around 70 to 80 hidden fields in my page. This hidden fields are initialized at the server side and then used at the client side for validations, calculations, etc,. using java script. I wanted to know if there is any other alternative approach to using hidden fields in asp.net. I guess, these many hidden fields are increasing the page size and hence affecting the performance of my web page and I want to do away with it. FYI: I am working on an asp.net web application.

    Read the article

  • Using ExecuteQuery() with entity framework, entity class.

    - by sfreelander
    I am trying to jump from ASP Classic to asp.net. I have followed tutorials to get Entity Framework and LINQ to connect to my test database, but I am having difficulties figuring out ExecuteQuery(). I believe the problem is that I need an "entity class" for my database, but I can't figure out how to do it. Here is my simple code: Dim db as New TestModel.TestEntity Dim results AS IEnumerable(OF ???) = db.ExecuteQuery(Of ???)("Select * from Table1") From the microsoft example site, they use an entity class called Customers, but I don't understand what that means.

    Read the article

  • Is it Possible to Write in a DropdownList or listbox?

    - by user280048
    work on Asp.Net C# vs08. I was wondering if it is possible to write in a dropdownlist or listbox such that if somebody does not want to select from the dropdownlist or listbox, he/she can type the value and if the value exist in the dropdownlist/listbox, it autofills. The person may then select it. If this is not possible in ASP.NET, would anybody know of another control that can be used for the same purpose and how? what I really need is how to allow the writting on the DropDownList, please someone help me!. Thank you very much.

    Read the article

  • Getting SharePoint absolute site url

    - by Francis
    I need to get the current absolute url of my site from inside an aspx page (no codebehind). I tried $SPUrl, but it get's converted into a relative url. <asp:Literal runat="server" text="<% $SPUrl:~Site/mypage.aspx %>" /> results in "/mypage.aspx". It's important that I get the full absolute url starting with "http://". <asp:Literal runat="server" text="<% $SPUrl:~SiteCollection/mypage.aspx %>" /> does the same. The goal is to get this url: "http://myspweb.com/mypage.aspx" as result.

    Read the article

  • Include in enity framework 4

    - by molgan
    Hello I've been using enity framework that came with 3.5sp. And now I've redone things for enityframework 4 and asp.net mvc 2. I've come across something (which worked in my previous version and asp.net mvc 1.0). I have this: public IQueryable<Booking> GetBookings() { return from b in _entities.Bookings.Include("BookingObject") select b; } And in my controller I have: return View("Index", new BookingsViewModel { Bookings = _br.GetBookings().ByDay(DateTime.Today) }); And it doesnt seem to include the "BookingObject"-entity, so I can type like <%= Model.Bookings.BookingObject.BookingObjectName %> in my view. What might be missing here? Do I need to turn something on in the diagram for it to include entities or? /M

    Read the article

  • SQL SELECT INSERTed data from Table

    - by Noam Smadja
    its in ASP Classic. MS-Access DB. i do: INSERT INTO Orders (userId) VALUES (123)" what i want to retrieve is orderNumber from that row. its an auto-increment number. so i did: SELECT orderNumber FROM Orders WHERE userId=123 but since it is on the same page, the SELECT returns: Either BOF or EOF is True, or the current record has been deleted. Requested operation requires a current record. i've seen somewhere RETURNING orderNumber as variable but it was for oracle and i dont know how to implement it into my asp :( set addOrder = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Command") addOrder.ActiveConnection = MM_KerenDB_STRING addOrder.CommandText = "INSERT INTO Orders (userId) VALUES ("&userId&")" addOrder.CommandType = 1 addOrder.CommandTimeout = 0 addOrder.Prepared = true addOrder.Execute() Dim getOrderNumber Set getOrderNumber = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Recordset") getOrderNumber.ActiveConnection = MM_KerenDB_STRING getOrderNumber.Source = "SELECT orderNumber FROM Orders WHERE userId=" & userId getOrderNumber.CursorType = 0 getOrderNumber.CursorLocation = 2 getOrderNumber.LockType = 1 getOrderNumber.Open() session("orderNumber") = getOrderNumber.Fields.Item("orderNumber").value

    Read the article

  • Controller should not have domain logic. How faithful should one adhere to this tenet?

    - by Hao
    Quoting from page 49 of Pro ASP.NET MVC book It is certainly possible to put domain logic into a controller, even though you shouldn’t, just because it seems like it will work anyway. It’s easy to avoid this if you imagine that you have multiple UI technologies (e.g., an ASP.NET MVC application plus a native iPhone application) operating on the same underlying business domain layer (and maybe one day you will!). With this in mind, it’s clear that you don’t want to put domain logic into any of the UI layers. Why he seems to contradict himself on page 172? [HttpPost] public ActionResult CheckOut(Cart cart, ShippingDetails shippingDetails) { // Empty carts can't be checked out if (cart.Lines.Count == 0) ModelState.AddModelError("Cart", "Sorry, your cart is empty!"); if (ModelState.IsValid) { orderSubmitter.SubmitOrder(cart, shippingDetails); cart.Clear(); return View("Completed"); } else // Something was invalid return View(shippingDetails); } Related to: How to avoid placing domain logic in controller?

    Read the article

  • ModalPopupExtender with thmbnail (problem in javascript)

    - by arny
    this is the code,it is not working in Firefox,Chrome,to show full size image unless user click on image for couple of times, I basically replace the thmbnail image with full size image in javascript, here is my code, TransitionDuration="50" FramesPerSecond="40" RequireOpenedPane="false" SelectedIndex="-1" SuppressHeaderPostbacks="true" HeaderCssClass="accordionHeader" ContentCssClass="accordionContent" OnItemDataBound="Accordion1_ItemDataBound" OnItemCommand="Accordion1_ItemCommand" ' ' Width="90px" Height="70px" onclick="togglePopupImage2(this);" CssClass="thumbnail" BorderColor="Navy" BorderStyle="Solid" BorderWidth="1" <table> <tr> <td style="background-color: #2E4d7B; height: 15px; color: White; font: arial bold 12px; padding: 5px"> <label id="imgText" runat="server"> </label> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <asp:Image ID="imgPopup" CssClass="imgpopup" runat="server" /> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center" style="background-color: #2E4d7B; height: 25px;"> <asp:Button ID="btnCancel" runat="server" Text="Close" CssClass="closeimage"/> </td> </tr> </table> </asp:Panel> And javascript code: function togglePopupImage2(thumbnail2) { var imageurl = thumbnail2.src; var temp = new Array(); temp = imageurl.split('.'); var imagepopup = temp[0].substring(0, temp[0].length - 3) + "." + temp[1]; var img = new Image(); img.src = imagepopup; $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_UserInterfaceID').style.visibility = 'visible'; $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_imgPopup').src = img.src; //alert(img.src); if (img.width > 750) { if (screen.width == '1024' || screen.width == '800') { $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_imgPopup').width = 550; //to show the picture in 1024 or 800 resolutions } else { $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_imgPopup').width = 750; } } else { $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_imgPopup').width = img.width; } if (img.height > 568) { if (screen.width == '1024' || screen.width == '800') { $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_imgPopup').height = 350; //to show the picture in 1024 or 800 resolutions } else { $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_imgPopup').height = 568; } } else { $get('ctl00_MainContentCPH_imgPopup').height = img.height; } // } } Please find the error and let me know what is the right way to achieve this? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • <Control>.Focus() from server side doesn't scroll into view

    - by George
    Custom Validation Control: <asp:CustomValidator ID="valSex" runat="server" ErrorMessage="1.2 &lt;b&gt;Sex&lt;/b&gt; not specified" EnableClientScript="true" ClientValidationFunction="ValidateSex" SetFocusOnError="True">Selection required</asp:CustomValidator> Client Side validation routine: function ValidateSex(source, args) { var optMale = document.getElementById("<%=optMale.ClientID %>"); var optFemale = document.getElementById("<%=optFemale.ClientID %>"); if (!optMale.checked && !optFemale.checked) { args.IsValid = false; optMale.focus(); } else args.IsValid = true; } When the page is submitted and Sex is not specified, focus is set but the 2 radio buttons are not quite in view, vertical scrolling is required to bring them into view. Shouldn't the Focus() method have brought the focus control into view?

    Read the article

  • can I debug my web project and wcf project on same vs 2008 instance ?

    - by dotnetcoder
    I have two projects in my solution   1- asp.net web project.   2- wcf serivce project.   3- other common projects between two listed above Current on the local dev machine I have to run two visual studio instance to run both projects in debug mode. That makes the system run out of resources as these projects share some other project in the soultion which are heavy in files. Is there a way i can hookup the wcf project on a sinlge visual stodio instance and also be able to debug my asp.net web project. ? I do not want to combine the web and wcf project in to one. Have already considred this option. thanks for sharing your thoughts in advance.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721  | Next Page >