Search Results

Search found 13262 results on 531 pages for 'complete validation'.

Page 72/531 | < Previous Page | 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79  | Next Page >

  • User entered value validation and level of error catching

    - by Terry
    May I ask should the error catching code be placed at the lowest level or at the top as I am not sure what is the best practice? I prefer placing at the bottom, example a, as Example a public static void Main(string[] args) { string operation = args[0]; int value = Convert.ToInt32(args[1]); if (operation == "date") { DoDate(value); } else if (operation == "month") { DoMonth(value); } } public static void DoMonth(int month) { if (month < 1 || month > 12) { throw new Exception(""); } } public static void DoDate(int date) { if (date < 1 || date > 31) { throw new Exception(""); } } or example b public static void Main(string[] args) { string operation = args[0]; int value = Convert.ToInt32(args[1]); if (operation == "date" && (date < 1 || date > 12)) { throw new Exception(""); } else if (operation == "month" && (month < 1 || month > 31)) { throw new Exception(""); } if (operation == "date") { DoDate(value); } else if (operation == "month") { DoMonth(value); } } public static void DoMonth(int month) { } public static void DoDate(int date) { }

    Read the article

  • codeigniter form validation if failed send user back

    - by Momen M El Zalabany
    i have this controller(visits.php) that use 3 models to build page, then it pass 4 vars to a view. this view contain a form that submit to another page (add_user.php) my question is how can i send the user back to visits.php in case the for_validation is false ? do i have to reload visits.php allover again ?-waste of resourss- or i should just send him back in history with js or php header for example ? can u plz show me an example of how u best handle false result of form_validation ? Note that when i user header('Location: ' . $_SERVER['HTTP_REFERER']); i couldnt echo validation_error() :( thanks for help

    Read the article

  • Handling form from different view and passing form validation through session in django

    - by Mo J. Mughrabi
    I have a requirement here to build a comment-like app in my django project, the app has a view to receive a submitted form process it and return the errors to where ever it came from. I finally managed to get it to work, but I have doubt for the way am using it might be wrong since am passing the entire validated form in the session. below is the code comment/templatetags/comment.py @register.inclusion_tag('comment/form.html', takes_context=True) def comment_form(context, model, object_id, next): """ comment_form() is responsible for rendering the comment form """ # clear sessions from variable incase it was found content_type = ContentType.objects.get_for_model(model) try: request = context['request'] if request.session.get('comment_form', False): form = CommentForm(request.session['comment_form']) form.fields['content_type'].initial = 15 form.fields['object_id'].initial = 2 form.fields['next'].initial = next else: form = CommentForm(initial={ 'content_type' : content_type.id, 'object_id' : object_id, 'next' : next }) except Exception as e: logging.error(str(e)) form = None return { 'form' : form } comment/view.py def save_comment(request): """ save_comment: """ if request.method == 'POST': # clear sessions from variable incase it was found if request.session.get('comment_form', False): del request.session['comment_form'] form = CommentForm(request.POST) if form.is_valid(): obj = form.save(commit=False) if request.user.is_authenticated(): obj.created_by = request.user obj.save() messages.info(request, _('Your comment has been posted.')) return redirect(form.data.get('next')) else: request.session['comment_form'] = request.POST return redirect(form.data.get('next')) else: raise Http404 the usage is by loading the template tag and firing {% comment_form article article.id article.get_absolute_url %} my doubt is if am doing the correct approach or not by passing the validated form to the session. Would that be a problem? security risk? performance issues? Please advise Update In response to Pol question. The reason why I went with this approach is because comment form is handled in a separate app. In my scenario, I render objects such as article and all I do is invoke the templatetag to render the form. What would be an alternative approach for my case? You also shared with me the django comment app, which am aware of but the client am working with requires a lot of complex work to be done in the comment app thats why am working on a new one.

    Read the article

  • Rails auto_complete "undefined method `auto_complete_for'" problem

    - by Andrew Wize
    rails - 2.3.8 ruby - 1.8.7 After auto_complete plugin installstion i still have "undefined method `auto_complete_for'" problem! Andrey-Bezruks-MacBook-Pro:eyeonasia.stage wizeflux$ ruby script/plugin install http://github.com/rails/auto_complete.git --force svn: '/Users/wizeflux/Projects/ionasia/eyeonasia.stage/vendor/plugins' is not a working copy Initialized empty Git repository in /Users/wizeflux/Projects/ionasia/eyeonasia.stage/vendor/plugins/auto_complete/.git/ warning: Option "depth" is ignored for github.com/rails/auto_complete.git From github.com/rails/auto_complete * branch HEAD - FETCH_HEAD Andrey-Bezruks-MacBook-Pro:eyeonasia.stage wizeflux$ after restarting server i get an error on line " auto_complete_for :listings, :name " - undefined method `auto_complete_for' for #

    Read the article

  • opening transaction validation in vb.net

    - by Mark
    Can anyone help me on how can I validate transaction example: transaction = mySqlConn.BeginTransaction(IsolationLevel.ReadCommitted) If there's still an opened transaction, then the code above will ignore.. How do I know if there was a transaction not yet committed before opening new transaction to avoid Nested Transaction?

    Read the article

  • JAX-WS: when input soap validation fails

    - by Jakob
    I have created a web service with JAX-WS. When the input SOAP message is not well formed or can not be validated, a soap fault is returned automatically to the caller. I dont want the caller to receive this standard SOAP message but i want to create an own custom SOAP fault. So if the call looks like this (note Envelope1, its not valid): hello a default return message is something like this: S:Client Couldn't create SOAP message due to exception: unexpected XML tag. expected: {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Envelope but found: {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Envelope1 I want the return message to be something like this: S:Client My own custom SOAP message! I have tried to get this to work the whole day, but i cant figure out how to do it. So if someone could help me I would be really glad!

    Read the article

  • New Facebook like button HTML validation

    - by Eric Di Bari
    After adding the new facebook like button to my page, it no longer validates using XHTML strict. The two errors I come across are: All of the "meta property" tags say that "there is no attribute "property"" All of the variables used in the like button line are listed that there are no attributes for it. The line is as follows: <fb:like href="http://www.pampamanta.org" layout="button_count" show_faces="false" width="120" action="like" font="arial" colorscheme="light"></fb:like>

    Read the article

  • C# method contents regex validation

    - by user258651
    I need to validate the contents of a C# method. I do not care about syntax errors. I do care about characters that will invalidate parsing of the rest of the code. For example: method() { /* valid comment */ /* <-- bad for (i..) { } for (i..) { <-- bad } I need to validate/fix any non-paired characters. This includeds /* */, { }, and maybe others. How should I go about this?

    Read the article

  • Client side validation of multiple radio buttons groups

    - by absolutely-free
    This is my code: <html> <head> <title>scoreboard</title> <script> function calculate() { var sum=0; var total=0; for (var i=0; i < document.questions.group1.length; i++){ if (document.questions.group1[i].checked){ sum = parseInt(document.questions.group1[i].value) total = parseInt(total + sum);}} for (var i=0; i < document.questions.group2.length; i++){ if (document.questions.group2[i].checked){ sum = parseInt(document.questions.group2[i].value) total = parseInt(total + sum);}} for (var i=0; i < document.questions.group3.length; i++){ if (document.questions.group3[i].checked){ sum = parseInt(document.questions.group3[i].value) total = parseInt(total + sum);}} alert(total) } </script> </head> <body> <form name="questions"> A:<br> answer a1: <input type="radio" name="group1" value="0"> answer a2: <input type="radio" name="group1" value="1"> answer a3: <input type="radio" name="group1" value="2"> answer a4: <input type="radio" name="group1" value="3"><br> B:<br> answer b1: <input type="radio" name="group2" value="0"> answer b2: <input type="radio" name="group2" value="1"> answer b3: <input type="radio" name="group2" value="2"> answer b4: <input type="radio" name="group2" value="3"><br> C:<br> answer c1: <input type="radio" name="group3" value="0"> answer c2: <input type="radio" name="group3" value="1"> answer c3: <input type="radio" name="group3" value="2"> answer c4: <input type="radio" name="group3" value="3"><br><br> <input type="button" value="total" onclick="calculate()"> </form> </body> </html> How can I replace 'group[x]' in my code by a variable, so the three for-loops are replaced by one (because in reality there are a lot more questions and answers) ?

    Read the article

  • cakephp phone number validation

    - by hellosheikh
    i am new to cakephp 2.x so i dont know how to do this .. i want to login the user from his email address and phone number..what my intention is if the number in database is this "12345" and the user is trying to login through this number "+12345" he can be login into the system.. i have written a code but i dont know how can i use this or to adjust my code within the auth component as the auth component is autometically logging the user .. here is my controller public function beforeFilter() { parent::beforeFilter(); $this->Auth->authenticate = array( 'Authenticate.Cookie' => array( 'fields' => array( 'username' => 'email', 'password' => 'password' ), 'userModel' => 'User', 'scope' => array('User.active' => 1) ), 'Authenticate.MultiColumn' => array( 'fields' => array( 'username' => 'email', 'password' => 'password' ), 'columns' => array('email', 'mobileNo'), 'userModel' => 'User', ) ); } public function login() { if ($this->Auth->login() || $this->Auth->loggedIn()) { $this->redirect('/users/dashboard'); }else{ $this->layout='logindefault'; $this->set('title_for_layout', 'Account Login'); /*$this->Auth->logout(); $cookie = $this->Cookie->read('Auth.User'); */ if ($this->request->is('post')) { if ($this->Auth->login() || $this->Auth->loggedIn()) { if ($this->Session->check('Auth.User')){ $this->_setCookie($this->Auth->user('idUser')); $this->redirect('/users/dashboard'); } }else { $this->Session->setFlash('Incorrect Email/Password Combination'); } }} } here is the code which i am trying to add .. $mobileNo='+123456789'; if (strpos($mobileNo,'+') !== false) { $mobileNo=str_replace("+", "",$mobileNo); } ?

    Read the article

  • xml validation problem

    - by Hoax
    I'm having trouble validating a schema I created. "cvc-elt.1: Cannot find the declaration of element 'category'." xsd <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <xs:element name="list"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="category" type="categoryType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:complexType name="categoryType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="name" type="xs:string"/> <xs:element name="desc" type="xs:string"/> <xs:element name="icon" type="xs:base64Binary"/> <xs:element name="poi" type="poiType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="poiType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="name" type="xs:string"/> <xs:element name="desc" type="xs:string"/> <xs:element name="longitude" type="xs:long"/> <xs:element name="latitude" type="xs:long"/> <xs:element name="url" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> <xs:element name="image" type="xs:base64Binary" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:schema> xml <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <list SchemaLocation="sem.xsd"> <category> <name>Sehenswürdigkeiten</name> <desc>sehenswerte und berühmte Orte, die man gesehen haben muss</desc> <icon>...</icon> <poi> <name>Linzer Landhaus</name> <desc>Sitz des Oberösterreichsichen Landtags</desc> <url>http://www.linz.at/tourismus/7569.asp</url> <longitude>48.304107</longitude> <latitude>14.286025</latitude>  </poi> <poi> <name>Ars Electronica</name> <desc>Museum der digitalen Künste</desc> <url>http://www.aec.at</url> <longitude>48.309788</longitude> <latitude>14.284179</latitude>   </poi> </category> <category>...</category> </list> any idea whats wrong? cheers hoax

    Read the article

  • asp .net MVC 2.0 xval Validation element

    - by ANDyW
    I got one problem with showing error message to element. Is there any option to turn on messages on place where is Html.ValidationMessageFor(model = model.ConfirmPassword). Becsoue for me it isn’t show up. I would like to have summary and near field information too not only red border. Any one know how to do it? using (Ajax.BeginForm("CreateValidForm", "Test", new AjaxOptions { HttpMethod = "Post" })) {%> <div id="validationSummary1"> <%= Html.ValidationSummary(true)%> </div> <fieldset> <legend>Fields</legend> <div class="editor-label"> <%= Html.LabelFor(model => model.Name)%> </div> <div class="editor-field"> <%= Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.Name)%> <%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.Name)%> </div> <div class="editor-label"> <%= Html.LabelFor(model => model.Email)%> </div> <div class="editor-field"> <%= Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.Email)%> <%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.Email)%> </div> <div class="editor-label"> <%= Html.LabelFor(model => model.Password)%> </div> <div class="editor-field"> <%= Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.Password)%> <%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.Password)%> </div> <div class="editor-label"> <%= Html.LabelFor(model => model.ConfirmPassword)%> </div> <div class="editor-field"> <%= Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.ConfirmPassword)%> <%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.ConfirmPassword)%> </div> <p> <input type="submit" value="Create" /> </p> </fieldset> <% } %> <%= Html.ClientSideValidation<ValidModel>() .UseValidationSummary("validationSummary1", "Please fix the following problems:") %> Here is link for sample project http://www.sendspace.com/file/m9gl54 .

    Read the article

  • Flex datagrid - determining when grid has completed renderering?

    - by ccdugga
    hi, i have a datagrid which contains a number of itemrenderers, it is populated each time a user does a search. Is there an event which can tell me when the datagrid has completed rendering all new rows and item renderers? I need to trigger an event once everything has been created so that i can resize then container which holds the grid. Currently im using DataGridEvent.HEADER_RELEASE and CollectionEvent.COLLECTION_CHANGE events to manage this however the problem with these events is that they get called as each new row is being added to the datagrid. therefore the whole process is becoming sluggish. Does anyone have any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Before after select event validation and results with jquery

    - by richbyte
    I am using a javascript function (F) (jquery )which uses 3 select values selected by the user to calculates a value - R(result) R is a number ranging from (1 through 9), (11) and (22); I need 2 extra steps one before the calculation and one after. a. Before calculation takes place: Make sure all three select values are changed before function(F) takes place. If not prompt the user with a notice ( create dom element/ I am using jquery) b. After the value R is calculated show an element corresponding to the result e.g. if R is 1 show an element ( a predetermined "link" element corresponding to each result value) thanks a lot.

    Read the article

  • PHP regex for password validation

    - by Fabio Anselmo
    I not getting the desired effect from a script. I want the password to contain A-Z, a-z, 0-9, and special chars. A-Z a-z 0-9 2 special chars 2 string length = 8 So I want to force the user to use at least 2 digits and at least 2 special chars. Ok my script works but forces me to use the digits or chars back to back. I don't want that. e.g. password testABC55$$ is valid - but i don't want that. Instead I want test$ABC5#8 to be valid. So basically the digits/special char can be the same or diff - but must be split up in the string. PHP CODE: $uppercase = preg_match('#[A-Z]#', $password); $lowercase = preg_match('#[a-z]#', $password); $number = preg_match('#[0-9]#', $password); $special = preg_match('#[\W]{2,}#', $password); $length = strlen($password) >= 8; if(!$uppercase || !$lowercase || !$number || !$special || !$length) { $errorpw = 'Bad Password';

    Read the article

  • LINQ to Entities and Business / Validation Rules

    - by Chris
    We have a requirement where we need to allow users to dynamically create custom reports that will run against our database and return sets of data. It would be something similar to this: http://www.marcuswhitworth.com/2009/12/dynamic-linq-with-expression-trees/ but would ultimately contain the ability to create more complicated logic. I believe LINQ to Entities might possibly allow us to do something like we're attempting to achieve. I should note that these reports are going to need to run against multiple tables. Can anyone point me in the right direction for something like this? Has anyone done anything similar with LINQ to Entities?

    Read the article

  • error message: clientside validation

    - by user281180
    What is the meaning of the following error message?How can I use the EnableClienTValidation()? Error 3 'System.Web.Mvc.HtmlHelper' does not contain a definition for 'EnableClientValidation' and no extension method 'EnableClientValidation' accepting a first argument of type 'System.Web.Mvc.HtmlHelper' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) c:\Dev\DEV\test3\Code\MvcUI\Views\Customer\Create.aspx 11 13 MvcUI I have reference the following:`" type="text/javascript" <script src="<%=Url.Content("~/Scripts/jquery.validate.js")%>" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="<%= Url.Content("~/Scripts/MicrosoftAjax.js")%>" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="<%= Url.Content("~/Scripts/MicrosoftMvcAjax.js")%>" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="<%= Url.Content("~/Scripts/MicrosoftMvcJQueryValidation.js" )%>" type="text/javascript"></script> `

    Read the article

  • javascript multiple input textbox validation

    - by murugesan
    I have 'n' number of textbox on a form, after the user enters a value in a textbox, i need to validate its not a duplicate in the other textboxes. Ex : Textbox[0] : 1 Textbox[1] : 2 Textbox[2] : 3 Textbox[4] : 1 For this example it should alert saying that '1' have entered twice. Let me know what to be done.

    Read the article

  • this.optional() in jQuery validation method doesn't seem to work

    - by HiveHicks
    Hello, I've got a little problem here. I've got the following rule for one of my fields: StartDate: { required: isDelayed, dateRU: true } isDelayed() returns false, so I guess StartDate field should be optional. However if I check it inside my dateRU method: $.validator.addMethod( "dateRU", function(value, element) { return this.optional(element) || isValidDate($.trim(value)); }, "Date is incorrect" ); this.optional(element) always returns false for StartDate. I can't figure out what's wrong. Any ideas? UPD. Does optional() returns true only if element is not required AND IS EMPTY? 'Cause that may be my problem.

    Read the article

  • Validation of textarea

    - by Hulk
    How to validate a textarea in a form.i.e, it should not be empty or have any new lines and if so raise an alert <script> function val() { //ifnewline found or blank raise an alert } </script> <form> <textarea name = "pt_text" rows = "8" cols = "8" class = "input" WRAP ></textarea> <input type=""button" onclick="val();" </form> Thanks

    Read the article

  • What makes people think that NNs have more computational power than existing models?

    - by Bubba88
    I've read in Wikipedia that neural-network functions defined on a field of arbitrary real/rational numbers (along with algorithmic schemas, and the speculative `transrecursive' models) have more computational power than the computers we use today. Of course it was a page of russian wikipedia (ru.wikipedia.org) and that may be not properly proven, but that's not the only source of such.. rumors Now, the thing that I really do not understand is: How can a string-rewriting machine (NNs are exactly string-rewriting machines just as Turing machines are; only programming language is different) be more powerful than a universally capable U-machine? Yes, the descriptive instrument is really different, but the fact is that any function of such class can be (easily or not) turned to be a legal Turing-machine. Am I wrong? Do I miss something important? What is the cause of people saying that? I do know that the fenomenum of undecidability is widely accepted today (though not consistently proven according to what I've read), but I do not really see a smallest chance of NNs being able to solve that particular problem. Add-in: Not consistently proven according to what I've read - I meant that you might want to take a look at A. Zenkin's (russian mathematician) papers after mid-90-s where he persuasively postulates the wrongness of G. Cantor's concepts, including transfinite sets, uncountable sets, diagonalization method (method used in the proof of undecidability by Turing) and maybe others. Even Goedel's incompletness theorems were proven in right way in only 21-st century.. That's all just to plug Zenkin's work to the post cause I don't know how widespread that knowledge is in CS community so forgive me if that did look stupid. Thank you!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79  | Next Page >