Search Results

Search found 32223 results on 1289 pages for 'sql 2012'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 722/1289 | < Previous Page | 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729  | Next Page >

  • SQL only row mapping record fetching

    - by Prasanna
    I have a customer call detail table in which call details of all customer stored. I have to find out the distinct aparty (means our customer ) who only calls our customers (means bparty also be our numbers) . There is no other domestic call , International calls made by A party (our customer) in this case. could you people please help me to find the same data. FILE INPUT oF SAMPLE CDR TABLE ROW NAME VALUES ANUMBER :-any mobile number(Domestic+International); for our customer it must like 70,070,0070,9370) BNUMBER :-any mobile number(Domestic+International); for our customer it must like 70,070,0070,9370 CALLTRANSACTION :-eg: 91,92,93 etc CALLTRANSACTIONTYPEC :-eg: MOC,MTC FILENAME :-MCS_01 etc TIME:- any time value Required Output DISTINCT ANUMBER :-for our customer it mobile number must start with 70 or 070 or 0070 or 9370 BNUMBER :- for our customer it mobile number must start with 70 or 070 or 0070 or 9370 means our customer only calls to our network customer ( No other doestic call or international calls made by our operator)

    Read the article

  • How to get comma-separated values in Linq?

    - by Mujtaba Hassan
    I have the query below: var users = (from a in dc.UserRoles join u in dc.Users on a.intUserId equals u.ID join r in dc.Roles on a.intRoleId equals r.ID where r.intClientId == clientID select new UserRoleDetail { ID = a.ID, intUserId = a.intUserId, intRoleId = a.intRoleId, Name =u.FullName, //Here I need comma separated values. intAssignedById = a.intAssignedById, RoleName = r.vchName, Function = u.vchFunction }); I require all the values of "Name =u.FullName" to be comma-separated in a single record group by intRoleId. I mean for every role I need all the usernames in a sigle record comma separated. Any suggestion?

    Read the article

  • Cannot resolve the collation conflict ???

    - by HAJJAJ
    hi guys I had this error and i don't know how to fix it Message=Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Arabic_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. note: I already change the collation from the database option -- Collation i change it from "Arabic_CI_AS" to "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and i am still getting the same error !! any suggestion to solve this ?

    Read the article

  • Installing databases after installation of server.

    - by claws
    Hello, I my software I need the client to install a database server (MySQL in my case). I'm deploying the setup and making user install it like a pre-requisite. After installing the DBMS server. I need to setup databases (that I created) on the client machine. How to do this automatically (as part of installation.)?

    Read the article

  • Bizarre WHERE col = NULL behavior

    - by Kenneth
    This is a problem one of our developers brought to me. He stumbled across an old stored procedure which used 'WHERE col = NULL' several times. When the stored procedure is executed it returns data. If the query inside the stored procedure is executed manually it will not return data unless the 'WHERE col = NULL' references are changed to 'WHERE col IS NULL'. Can anyone explain this behavior?

    Read the article

  • Alternative to NOT EXISTS

    - by Dave Colwell
    Hi all, I have two tables linked by an ID column, lets call them Table A and table B. My goal is to find all the records in table A that have no record in table B. For instance: Table A: ID----Value 1-----value1 2-----value2 3-----value3 4-----value4 Table B ID----Value 1-----x 2-----y 4-----z 4-----l As you can see, record with ID = 3 does not exist in table B, so i want a query that will give me record 3 from table A. the way i am currently doing this is by saying AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT ID FROM TableB) but since the tables are huge, the performance on this is terrible. Also, when i tried using a Left Join where TableB.ID is null, it didnt work. Can anyone suggest an alternative?

    Read the article

  • How do I create a table in SQLite using the VS2008 Server Explorer

    - by fishhead
    Hello, I would like to create a table in a SQLite database using the Server Explorer in VS2008. I am able to do other operations on the database but when it comes to creating a table using the query builder I get Not Supported messages. is there another way other than writing code just for the sole purpose of creating the table? CREATE TABLE myTable ( ID INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT, Name VARCHAR(100) ) .NET Framework Data Provider for SQLite 3.6.16

    Read the article

  • Postgesql select from 2 tables. Joins?

    - by Daniel
    I have 2 tables that look like this: Table "public.phone_lists" Column | Type | Modifiers ----------+-------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------- id | integer | not null default nextval(('"phone_lists_id_seq"'::text)::regclass) list_id | integer | not null sequence | integer | not null phone | character varying | name | character varying | and Table "public.email_lists" Column | Type | Modifiers ---------+-------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------- id | integer | not null default nextval(('"email_lists_id_seq"'::text)::regclass) list_id | integer | not null email | character varying | I'm trying to get the list_id, phone, and emails out of the tables in one table. I'm looking for an output like: list_id | phone | email ---------+-------------+-------------------------------- 0 | | [email protected] 0 | | [email protected] 0 | | [email protected] 0 | | [email protected] 0 | | [email protected] 1 | 15555555555 | 1 | 15555551806 | 1 | 15555555508 | 1 | 15055555506 | 1 | 15055555558 | 1 | | [email protected] 1 | | [email protected] I've come up with select pl.list_id, pl.phone, el.email from phone_lists as pl left join email_lists as el using (list_id); but thats not quite right. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Using a comma seperated data in MYSQL "IN" clause

    - by Sashi Kant
    I have a column in one of my table where I store multiple ids seperated by comma's. Is there a way in which I can use this column's value in the "IN" clause of a query. The column(city) has values like 6,7,8,16,21,2 I need to use as Select * from table where e_ID in (Select city from locations where e_Id=?) I am satisfied with Crozin's answer, but I am open to suggestions, views and options. Feel free to share your views.

    Read the article

  • php convert european datetime to mysql datetime

    - by Mathlight
    I'm really stuck with this problem. I've got an datetime string like this: 28-06-14 11:01:00 I'm trying to convert it to 2014-06-28 11:01:00 so that i can insert it into the database ( with field type datetime. I've tryed multiple things like this: $datumHolder = new DateTime($data['datum'], new DateTimeZone('Europe/Amsterdam')); $datum1 = $datumHolder -> format("Y-m-d H:i:s"); $datum2 = date( 'Y-m-d', strtotime(str_replace('-', '/', $data['datum']) ) ); $datum3 = DateTime::createFromFormat( 'Y-m-d-:Hi:s', $data['datum']); This is the output i get: datum1: 2028-06-14 11:01:00 datum2: 1970-01-01 And i get an error for datum3: echo "datum3: " . $datum3->format( 'Y-m-d H:i:s'); . '<br />'; Call to a member function format() on a non-object So my question is very clear... What am I doing wrong / how to get this working? Thanks in advantage guys! I know that this question is asked many, many times... But whatever i try, i can't get it working...

    Read the article

  • drop down list binding

    - by John
    I have a table which has an Id and a name field. I usually bind the name to the dropdownlist but I was told that any dml should be on the Id so how can I use the name in the dropdownlist and at the same time still use the Id?

    Read the article

  • All symbols after & stripped

    - by user300413
    My query: mysql::getInstance()->update('requests', array('response' => mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['status'])), array('secret' => $_POST['secret'])); ?> If i wand to add string with "&" symbol, all symbols after "&" stripped. Example: string: !"?;%:?*()_+!@#$%^&*()_+ in database i see only: !"?;%:?*()_+!@#$%^ How to fix this? update function, if anyone need: function update($table, $updateList, $whereConditions) { $updateQuery = ''; foreach ($updateList as $key => $newValue) { if (!is_numeric($newValue)) { $newValue = "'" . $newValue . "'"; } if (strlen($updateQuery) == 0) { $updateQuery .= '`' . $key . '` = ' . $newValue; } else { $updateQuery .= ', `' . $key . '` = ' . $newValue; } } return $this->query('UPDATE ' . $table . ' SET ' . $updateQuery . $this->buildWhereClause($whereConditions)); }

    Read the article

  • How can I "merge", "flatten" or "pivot" results from a query which returns multiple rows into a sing

    - by dsm
    I have a simple query over a table, which returns results like the following: id id_type id_ref 2702 5 31 2702 16 14 2702 17 3 2702 40 1 2702 26 4 And I would like to merge the results into a single row, for instance: id concatenation 2702 5,16,17,40,26:31,14,3,1,4 Is there any way to do this within a trigger? NB: I know I can use a cursor, but I would really prefer not to unless there is no better way.

    Read the article

  • Order by is not working

    - by coure06
    With Results as ( SELECT Top(100) percent ROW_NUMBER() over (Order by (select 1)) as RowNumber, Ad.Date, Title FROM Ad inner join Job on Ad.Id = Job.AdId Order by case When @sortCol='Date' and @sortDir='ASC' Then Date End ASC, case When @sortCol='Date' and @sortDir='DESC' Then Date End DESC ) Select * from Results Where RowNumber BETWEEN @FirstRow AND @LastRow END Whatever is passed in @sortDir and @sortCol it does not work.What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Correct model for a database with a table for each user.

    - by BAH
    Kinda stuck here... I have an application with lets say 5000 rows of data per user and was wondering if it was right or wrong to do it this way: On user account creation a new table is created (UserData_[UserID]) or should I just have 1 table for userdata and have everything in there with a column for userid? The reason I am stuck at the moment is that it seems NHibernate isn't able to be mapped to dynamic table names without creating another ISessionFactory which has alot of overhead AFAIK. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to convert full outer join query to O-R query?

    - by Kugel
    I'm converting relational database into object-relational in Oracle. I have a query that uses full outer join in the old one. Is it possible to write the same query for O-R database without explicitly using full outer join? For normal inner join it simple, I just use dot notation together with ref/deref. I'm interested in this in general so let's say the relational query is: select a.attr, b.attr from a full outer join b on (a.fk = b.pk); I want to know if it's a good idea to do it this way: select a.attr, b.attr from a_obj a full outer join b_obj b on (a.b_ref = ref(b));

    Read the article

  • SQL select all items of an owner from an item-to-owner table

    - by kdobrev
    I have a table bike_to_owner. I would like to select current items owned by a specific user. Table structure is CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `bike_to_owner` ( `bike_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, `user_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, `last_change_date` date NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`bike_id`,`user_id`,`last_change_date`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_unicode_ci; In the profile page of the user I would like to display all his/her current possessions. I wrote this statement: SELECT `bike_id`,`user_id`,max(last_change_date) FROM `bike_to_owner` WHERE `user_id` = 3 group by `last_change_date` but i'm not quite sure it works correctly in all cases. Can you please verify this is correct and if not suggest me something better. Using php/mysql. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • alias some columns names as one field in oracle's join select query

    - by Marecky
    Hi We are developing something like a social networking website. I've got task to do 'follow me' functionality. In our website objects are users, teams, companies, channels and groups (please don't ask why there are groups and teams - it is complicated for me too, but teams are releated to user's talent) Users, teams, channels, companies and groups have all their own tables. I have a query which gets me all the follower's leaders like this select --fo.leader_id, --fo.leader_type, us.name as user_name, co.name as company_name, ch.title as channel_name, gr.name as group_name, tt.name as team_name from follow_up fo left join users us on (fo.leader_id = us.id and fo.leader_type = 'user') left join companies co on (fo.leader_id = co.user_id and fo.leader_type = 'company') left join channels ch on (fo.leader_id = ch.id and fo.leader_type = 'channel') left join groups gr on (fo.leader_id = gr.id and fo.leader_type = 'group') left join talent_teams tt on (fo.leader_id = tt.id and fo.leader_type = 'team') where follower_id = 83 I need to get all fields like: user_name, company_name, channel_name, group_name, team_name as one field in SELECT's product. I have tried to alias them all the same 'name' but Oracle numbered it. Please help :)

    Read the article

  • Django: Determining if a user has voted or not

    - by TheLizardKing
    I have a long list of links that I spit out using the below code, total votes, submitted by, the usual stuff but I am not 100% on how to determine if the currently logged in user has voted on a link or not. I know how to do this from within my view but do I need to alter my below view code or can I make use of the way templates work to determine it? I have read http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1528583/django-vote-up-down-method but I don't quite understand what's going on ( and don't need any ofjavascriptery). Models (snippet): class Link(models.Model): category = models.ForeignKey(Category, blank=False, default=1) user = models.ForeignKey(User) created = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True) modified = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True) url = models.URLField(max_length=1024, unique=True, verify_exists=True) name = models.CharField(max_length=512) def __unicode__(self): return u'%s (%s)' % (self.name, self.url) class Vote(models.Model): link = models.ForeignKey(Link) user = models.ForeignKey(User) created = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True) def __unicode__(self): return u'%s vote for %s' % (self.user, self.link) Views (snippet): def hot(request): links = Link.objects.select_related().annotate(votes=Count('vote')).order_by('-created') for link in links: delta_in_hours = (int(datetime.now().strftime("%s")) - int(link.created.strftime("%s"))) / 3600 link.popularity = ((link.votes - 1) / (delta_in_hours + 2)**1.5) if request.user.is_authenticated(): try: link.voted = Vote.objects.get(link=link, user=request.user) except Vote.DoesNotExist: link.voted = None links = sorted(links, key=lambda x: x.popularity, reverse=True) links = paginate(request, links, 15) return direct_to_template( request, template = 'links/link_list.html', extra_context = { 'links': links, }) The above view actually accomplishes what I need but in what I believe to be a horribly inefficient way. This causes the dreaded n+1 queries, as it stands that's 33 queries for a page containing just 29 links while originally I got away with just 4 queries. I would really prefer to do this using Django's ORM or at least .extra(). Any advice?

    Read the article

  • UUID collision risk using different algorithms

    - by Diego Jancic
    Hi Guys, I have a database where 2 (or maybe 3 or 4) different applications are inserting information. The new information has IDs of the type GUID/UUID, but each application is using a different algorithm to generate the IDs. For example, one is using the NHibernate's "guid.comb", other is using the SQLServer's NEWID(), other might want to use .NET's Guid.NewGuid() implementation. Is there an above normal risk of ID collision or duplicates? Thanks!

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729  | Next Page >