Search Results

Search found 36773 results on 1471 pages for 'sql statement syntax'.

Page 763/1471 | < Previous Page | 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770  | Next Page >

  • Using closes sql connection brought over by a function

    - by iefpw
    Would this using close this _connection? using(SqlConnection _connection = Class1.GetSqlConnection()) { //code inside the connection } //connection should be closed/ended? I'm just wondering because GetSqlConnection() is a static function of Class1 and the whole connection might not be closed because it is calling outside class' static function instead of straight? using(SqlConnection _connection = new SqlConnection(_connectionString) { //code inside the connection }

    Read the article

  • How to write a query get all infomation from one table to another one

    - by Dave
    I am building access database that will get data from a outside source and place it in a table that is link to the data source. As we all know that you are not allowed to recinfigure that linked table. What I want to do is take that data from that that linked table and make another table that I will be able to add additional new fields and snyc the out that gets put into the linked table. Please Help

    Read the article

  • Check mysql_query results if DELETE query worked?

    - by Camran
    I have a DELETE query which deletes a record from a mysql db. is there any way to make sure if the delete was performed or not? I mean, for a query to FIND stuff you do $res=mysql_query($var); $nr=mysql_num_rows($res); and you get nr of rows returned. Is there any similiar method for deletion of records? Thanks

    Read the article

  • sql clarification

    - by JPro
    Can anyone please clarify what this query will return ? SELECT TestCase FROM MyTable WHERE Verdict = 'PASS' AND StartTime > DATE_SUB(NOW(), INTERVAL 2 MONTH)

    Read the article

  • How to deal with 2 almost identical tables

    - by jgritty
    I have a table of baseball stats, something like this: CREATE TABLE batting_stats( ab INTEGER, pa INTEGER, r INTEGER, h INTEGER, hr INTEGER, rbi INTEGER, playerID INTEGER, FOREIGN KEY(playerID) REFERENCES player(playerID) ); But then I have a table of stats that are basically exactly the same, but for a team: CREATE TABLE team_batting_stats( ab INTEGER, pa INTEGER, r INTEGER, h INTEGER, hr INTEGER, rbi INTEGER, teamID INTEGER, FOREIGN KEY(teamID) REFERENCES team(teamID) ); My first instinct is to scrap the Foreign key and generalize the ID, but I still have a problem, I have these 2 tables, and they can't have overlapping IDs: CREATE TABLE player( playerID INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, firstname TEXT, lastname TEXT, number INTEGER, teamID INTEGER, FOREIGN KEY(teamID) REFERENCES team(teamID) ); CREATE TABLE team( teamID INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, name TEXT, city TEXT, ); I feel like I'm overlooking something obvious that could solve this problem and reduce stats to a single table.

    Read the article

  • MySql: make this query faster… is there a way ? PART TWO

    - by robert
    This is part two of the question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2913639/mysql-make-this-query-faster-theres-a-way this query still run slowly: SELECT b.id, b.name, c.name FROM bookcorr as a JOIN books as b on b.id = a.books_id = JOIN Library as c on c.id = a.library_id WHERE a.category_id = '2521' AND a.library_id = '4983' ORDER BY b.name ASC LIMIT 0,15 Any suggest ?

    Read the article

  • Delete rows out of table that is innerjoined and unioned with 2 others

    - by jonathan
    We have 3 tables (table1, table2, table3), and I need to delete all the rows from table1 that have the same ID in table2 OR table3. To see a list of all of these rows I have this code: ( select table2.ID, table2.name_first, table2.name_last, table2.Collected from table2 inner join table1 on table1.ID = table2.ID where table2.Collected = 'Y' ) union ( select table3.ID, table3.name_first, table3.name_last, table3.Collected from table3 inner join table1 on table1.ID = table3.ID where table3.Collected = 'Y' ) I get back about 200 rows. How do I delete them from table1? I don't have a way to test if my query will work, so I'm nervous about modifying something I found online and potentially deleting data (we do have backups, but I'd rather not test out their integrity). TIA!

    Read the article

  • Docmd.TransferText to update data

    - by every_answer_gets_a_point
    i am using Docmd.TransferText to import data from a text file into my access table. i would like it to do the following: if the record already exists, then update it if the record does not exist then add it how do i accomplish this? currently i have this line: DoCmd.TransferText acImportDelim, yesyes, "table3", "C:\requisition_data_dump.txt", True

    Read the article

  • Simple DB2 Query for connection validation

    - by Eric Tuttleman
    I'm looking for a simple DB2 query that can be used to test if a database connection in pool is still valid. It needs to be a generic query that would execute regardless of which databases exist. For other database servers, I've used something like 'SELECT 1' or 'SELECT version();' What would be an equivalent for DB2? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Which is faster join

    - by Costa
    Hi Which is faster SELECT * FROM X INNER JOIN Y ON x.Record_ID = y.ForignKey_NotIndexed_NotUnique or SELECT * FROM X INNER JOIN Y ON y.ForignKey_NotIndexed_NotUnique = x.Record_ID

    Read the article

  • MySQL: Select remaining rows

    - by Bjork24
    I've searched everywhere for this, but I can't seem to find a solution. Perhaps I'm using the wrong terms. Either way, I'm turning to good ol' trusty S.O. to help my find the answer. I have two tables, we'll call them 'tools' and 'installs' tools = id, name, version installs = id, tool_id, user_id The 'tools' table records available tools, which are then installed by a user and recorded in the 'installs' table. Selecting the installed tools are simple enough: SELECT tools.name FROM tools LEFT JOIN installs ON tools.id = installs.tool_id WHERE user_id = 99 ; How do I select the remaining tools -- the ones that have yet to be installed by user #99? I'm sorry if this is painfully obvious, but I just can't seem to figure it out! Thanks for the help!

    Read the article

  • delete taking really long time! mysql

    - by every_answer_gets_a_point
    i am doing this: delete calibration_2009 from calibration_2009 join batchinfo_2009 on calibration_2009.rowid = batchinfo_2009.rowid where batchinfo_2009.reporttime like '%2010%'; both tables have about 500k lines of data i suspect that 250k match the criteria to be deleted so far it has been running for 2 hours!!! is there something wrong?

    Read the article

  • MySQL: averaging with nulls...

    - by Zombies
    Is there a simple way I can exclude nulls from affecting the avg? They appear to count as 0, which is not what I want. I simply don't want to take their average into account, yet here is the catch, I can't drop them from the result set, as that record has data on it that I do need.

    Read the article

  • how to join on varchar(32) and binary(16) columns in sybase?

    - by Paul Sanwald
    I want to join two tables on a UUID. table A's UUID is represented as varchar(32). table B's UUID is represented as binary(16). what's the best way to join a varchar to a binary column? I've tried using some sybase functions for this, but I'm getting different results and unsure of why: select hextobigint('0x000036ca4c4c11d88b8dcd1344cdb512') 3948051912944290701 select convert(bigint,0x000036ca4c4c11d88b8dcd1344cdb512) -2877434794219274240 what am I missing about convert and hextobigint? I must be misundstanding at least one of these functions. thanks for your help!

    Read the article

  • Why isn't INT more efficient than UNIQUEIDENTIFIER (according to the execution plan)?

    - by ck
    I have a parent table and child table where the columns that join them together are the UNIQUEIDENTIFIER type. The child table has a clustered index on the column that joins it to the parent table (its PK, which is also clustered). I have created a copy of both of these tables but changed the relationship columns to be INTs instead, have rebuilt the indexes so that they are essentially the same structure and can be queried in the same way. When I query for a known 20 records from the parent table, pulling in all the related records from the child tables, I get identical query costs across both, i.e. 50/50 cost for the batches. If this is true, then my giant project to change all of the tables like this appears to be pointless, other than speeding up inserts. Can anyone provide any light on the situation? EDIT: The question is not about which is more efficient, but why is the query execution plan showing both queries as having the same cost?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770  | Next Page >