Search Results

Search found 53054 results on 2123 pages for 'sql sample database'.

Page 845/2123 | < Previous Page | 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852  | Next Page >

• MySQL - Calculating a value from two columns in each row, using the result in a WHERE or HAVING clause

  - by taber

  I have a MySQL db schema like so: id flags views done ------------------------------- 1 2 20 0 2 66 100 0 3 25 40 0 4 30 60 0 ... thousands of rows ... I want to update all of the rows whose flags / views are = 0.2. First as a test I want to try to SELECT to see how many rows would actually get updated. I tried: SELECT flags/views AS poncho FROM mytable HAVING poncho 0.2 But this only returns like 2 rows and I know there should be a lot more than that. It seems like it's calculating the poncho value on all rows or something odd. What am I doing wrong? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Continous integration with Reporting Services

  - by SDReyes

  I'm implementing a continuous integration environment with SVN and reporting services. The reports are stored in the SVN repository. when a change occurs, they are automatically downloaded from the repository, and any file changed should be uploaded to the reporting services server. How could you automate the upload/update process for .rdl files?

  Read the article

• Help with Oracle Query

  - by Gnaniyar Zubair

  I want to delete all the records where field name class="10010" from Table A and AentryId = BentryId from Table B. if i delete the entryId 12 which matches className=10010 from Table A and the same time that same id should delete from Table B also. Table A: AentryId className 12 10010 13 10011 14 10010 15 10011 Table B: BentryId name 12 xyz 13 abc 14 aaa

  Read the article

• Linq2SQL to produce Like operator

  - by Dante

  Hi, I have a string "Word1 Word2" and I want to transform it to a query such as "Like '%Word1%Word2%'". At the moment I have: from t in Test where t.Field.Contains("Word1 Word2") How to do this in LINQ2SQL? Do I need to create two separate queries for this, can't I write it in the same statement? Thx in advance

  Read the article

• mysql - select pagination chunk that includes a given id

  - by sean smith

  ...before the pagination chunks have been determined. I know you can do this in multiple statements, but there must be a better way. my results are returned ordered by date and I want to return the pagination chunk that contains a given id. So I could, for example, select the date of the given id and then select a chunk of results where date is less than or greater than the date. That would work. But is there some native mysql method of doing this sort of thing in one statement? It just seems reasonable to expect that we could ask for X results in which a given id exists if results are ordered by date.

  Read the article

• Use of HAVING in MySQL

  - by KBrian

  I have a table from which I need to select all persons that have a first name that is not unique and that that set should be selected only if among the persons with a similar first name, all have a different last name. Example: FirstN LastN Bill Clinton Bill Cosby Bill Maher Elvis Presley Elvis Presley Largo Winch I want to obtain FirstN LastN Bill Clinton or FirstN LastN Bill Clinton Bill Cosby Bill Maher I tried this but it does not return what I want. SELECT * FROM Ids GROUP BY FirstN, LastN HAVING (COUNT(FirstN)>1 AND COUNT(LastN)=1)) [Edited my post after Aleandre P. Lavasseur remark]

  Read the article

• Is there a PHP library that performs MySQL Data Validation and Sanitization According to Column Type

  - by JW

  Do you know of any open source library or framework that can perform some basic validation and escaping functionality for a MySQL Db. i envisage something along the lines of: //give it something to perform the quote() quoteInto() methods $lib->setSanitizor($MyZend_DBAdaptor); //tell it structure of the table - colnames/coltypes/ etc $lib->setTableDescription($tableDescArray); //use it to validate and escape according to coltype foreach ($prospectiveData as $colName => $rawValue) if ( $lib->isValid($colName, $rawValue)) { //add it to the set clause $setValuesArray[$lib->escapeIdentifier($colName);] = $lib->getEscapedValue($colName,$rawValue); } else { throw new Exception($colName->getErrorMessage()); } etc... I have looked into - Zend_Db_Table (which knows about a table's description), and - Zend_Db_Adaptor (which knows how to escape/sanitize values depending on TYPE) but they do not automatically do any clever stuff during updates/inserts Anyone know of a good PHP library to preform this kind of validation that I could use rather than writing my own? i envisage alot of this kind of stuff: ... elseif (eregi('^INT|^INTEGER',$dataset_element_arr[col_type])) { $datatype='int'; if (eregi('unsigned',$dataset_element_arr[col_type])) { $int_max_val=4294967296; $int_min_val=0; } else { $int_max_val=2147483647; $int_min_val=-2147483648; } } (p.s I know eregi is deprecated - its just an example of laborious code)

  Read the article

• Adding miliseconds to a datetime in tsql INSERT INTO

  - by DavRob60

  I'm doing a INSERT INTO query in order to initialize a new table. The primary key is RFQ_ID and Action_Time How could add 1 milisecond to each Action_Time on new record in order to avoid "Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint" INSERT INTO QSW_RFQ_Log (RFQ_ID, Action_Time, Quote_ID) SELECT RFQ_ID , GETDATE() AS Action_Time , Quote_ID , 'Added to RFQ on Initialization' AS Note FROM QSW_Quote

  Read the article

• javax.sql.DataSource.getConnection() locks system

  - by Ryan Elkins

  I'm using the Apache Commons DBCP library for connection pooling in a desktop application. I've done this before and never had a problem but the latest application has started sometimes locking up on the call to getConnection() on my DataSource. The application just hangs after that call. I'm closing up my resources when I'm done with them. Is there any known reason why this might happen? I'm not even sure where to being troubleshooting this now that I've got it narrowed down to this method. It doesn't always hang - sometimes it happens fairly quickly, sometimes it takes a long time. Sometimes it doesn't happen at all, although lately I can get it to happen within a few minutes.

  Read the article

• Creating stored procedure having different WHERE clause on different search criteria without putting

  - by Muhammad Kashif Nadeem

  Is there any alternate way to create stored procedure without putting all query in one long string if criteria of WWHERE clause can be different. Suppose I have Orders table I want to create stored procedure on this table and there are three column on which I wnat to filter records. 1- CustomerId, 2- SupplierId, 3- ProductId. If user only give CustomerId in search criteria then query should be like following SELECT * FROM Orders WHERE Orders.CustomerId = @customerId And if user only give ProductId in search criteria then query should be like following SELECT * FROM Orders WHERE Orders.ProductId = @productId And if user only all three CustomerId, ProductId, and SupplierId is given then all three Ids will be used in WHERE to filter. There is also chance that user don't want to filter record then query should be like following SELCT * FROM Orders Whenever I have to create this kind of procedure I put all this in string and use IF conditions to check if arguments (@customeId or @supplierId etc) has values. I use following method to create procedure DECLARE @query VARCHAR(MAX) DECLARE @queryWhere VARCHAR(MAX) SET @query = @query + 'SELECT * FROM Orders ' IF (@originationNumber IS NOT NULL) BEGIN BEGIN SET @queryWhere =@queryWhere + ' Orders.CustomerId = ' + CONVERT(VARCHAR(100),@customerId) END END IF(@queryWhere <> '') BEGIN SET @query = @query+' WHERE ' + @queryWhere END EXEC (@query) Thanks.

  Read the article

• Is it possible to "merge" the values of multiple records into a single field without using a stored

  - by j0rd4n

  A co-worker posed this question to me, and I told them, "No, you'll need to write a sproc for that". But I thought I'd give them a chance and put this out to the community. Essentially, they have a table with keys mapping to multiple values. For a report, they want to aggregate on the key and "mash" all of the values into a single field. Here's a visual: --- ------- Key Value --- ------- 1 A 1 B 1 C 2 X 2 Y The result would be as follows: --- ------- Key Value --- ------- 1 A,B,C 2 X,Y They need this in SQLServer 2005. Again, I think they need to write a stored procedure, but if anyone knows a magic out-of-the-box function that does this, I'd be impressed.

  Read the article

• SQL Alchemy related Objects Error

  - by alex

  from sqlalchemy.orm import relation, backref from sqlalchemy import Table, Column, Integer, String, MetaData, ForeignKey, Date, Sequence from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base Base = declarative_base() class GUI_SCENARIO(Base): __tablename__ = 'GUI_SCENARIO' Scenario_ID = Column(Integer, primary_key=True) Definition_Date = Column(Date) guiScenarioDefinition = relation('GUI_SCENARIO_DEFINITION', order_by='GUI_SCENARIO_DEFINITION.Scenario_Definition_ID', backref='guiScenario') def __init__(self, Scenario_ID=None, Definition_Date=None): self.Scenario_ID = Scenario_ID self.Definition_Date = Definition_Date class GUI_SCENARIO_DEFINITION(Base): __tablename__='GUI_SCENARIO_DEFINITION' Scenario_Definition_ID = Column(Integer, Sequence('Scenario_Definition_ID_SEQ'), primary_key=True) Scenario_FK = Column(Integer, ForeignKey('GUI_SCENARIO.Scenario_ID')) Definition_Date=Column(Date) guiScenario = relation(GUI_SCENARIO, backref=backref('guiScenarioDefinition', order_by=Scenario_Definition_ID)) def __init__(self, Scenario_FK, Definition_Date): self.Scenario_FK = Scenario_FK self.Definition_Date = Definition_Date guiScenario = relation(GUI_SCENARIO, backref=backref('guiScenarioDefinition', order_by=Scenario_Definition_ID)) tableNameScenario = "GUI_SCENARIO" scenarioClass = getattr(MappingTablesScenario, tableNameScenario) tableScenario = Table(tableNameScenario, meta, autoload=True) mapper(scenarioClass, tableScenario) scenarioName = scenarioDefinition.name scenarioDefinitionDate = datetime.today() newScenario = MappingTablesScenario.GUI_SCENARIO(scenarioName, scenarioDefinitionDate) print newScenario.guiScenarioDefinition If I try to get the objects related to a scenarioObject, I always get this error: AttributeError: 'GUI_SCENARIO' object has no attribute 'guiScenarioDefinition' Does anyone know, why I get this error?

  Read the article

• Is my understanding of "select distinct" correct?

  - by paxdiablo

  We recently discovered a performance problem with one of our systems and I think I have the fix but I'm not certain my understanding is correct. In simplest form, we have a table blah into which we accumulate various values based on a key field. The basic form is: recdate date rectime time system varchar(20) count integer accum1 integer accum2 integer There are a lot more accumulators than that but they're all of the same form. The primary key is made up of recdate, rectime and system. As values are collected to the table, the count for a given recdate/rectime/system is incremented and the values for that key are added to the accumulators. That means the averages can be obtained by using accumN / count. Now we also have a view over that table specified as follows: create view blah_v ( recdate, rectime, system, count, accum1, accum2 ) as select distinct recdate, rectime, system, count, value (case when count > 0 then accum1 / count end, 0), value (case when count > 0 then accum2 / count end, 0) from blah; In other words, the view gives us the average value of the accumulators rather than the sums. It also makes sure we don't get a divide-by-zero in those cases where the count is zero (these records do exist and we are not allowed to remove them so don't bother telling me they're rubbish - you're preaching to the choir). We've noticed that the time difference between doing: select distinct recdate from XX varies greatly depending on whether we use the table or the view. I'm talking about the difference being 1 second for the table and 27 seconds for the view (with 100K rows). We actually tracked it back to the select distinct. What seems to be happening is that the DBMS is actually loading all the rows in and sorting them so as to remove duplicates. That's fair enough, it's what we stupidly told it to do. But I'm pretty sure the fact that the view includes every component of the primary key means that it's impossible to have duplicates anyway. We've validated the problem since, if we create another view without the distinct, it performs at the same speed as the underlying table. I just wanted to confirm my understanding that a select distinct can not have duplicates if it includes all the primary key components. If that's so, then we can simply change the view appropriately.

  Read the article

• Select result in single cell

  - by Ruslan

  How can i select all id's for records in single cell? For example: --example select of all values select id, name, address, phone from table And get all id's where phone like '%555%' and show them in single field like: '111 123 234 321 231 234'

  Read the article

• Stored Procedures last access time?

  - by Ardman

  Is it possible to find out when a Stored Procedure was last accessed? I tried the following: SELECT * FROM sys.dm_db_index_usage_stats WHERE [database_id] = DB_ID() AND [object_id] = OBJECT_ID('stored procedure name') and it returns a blank resultset.

  Read the article

• ASP.Net Custom Field From Query In DataSet

  - by boruchsiper

  I added a new query to a table adapter in a DataSet. This query adds another field to the query whcih is a sum from another table. Here is the full query: SELECT (SELECT COUNT(donationID) AS Expr1 FROM Donations AS da WHERE (dn.donorID = donorID)) AS Count, Solicitor, address1, address2, city, companyName, country, donorID, email, first, last, phoneHome, phoneMobile, phoneWork, state, webURL, zip, (select sum(amount) from Donations as dna where dna.donorID = dn.donorID) as SumDonations FROM Donors AS dn order by last The new field is represented in the last part of the query: (select sum(amount) from Donations as dna where dna.donorID = dn.donorID) as SumDonations I can preview the data in the xsd but the last field "SumDonations" is not showing up as a field I can add to my gridview. I rebuilt the website but no luck. What am I missing?

  Read the article

• After adding index Execution Plan SqlServer keeps suggesting the index

  - by Lieven Cardoen

  If I run the execution plan of an sp, Management Studio suggests an index. I add the index, run the execution plan again, and it keeps suggesting the same index... What am I doing wrong here? I already restarted SqlServer and Management Studio, but that's doesn't help.

  Read the article

• workbench vs phpmyadmin

  - by ajsie

  i've only used phpmyadmin but then i stumbled upon mysql workbench that looks promising. i wonder if someone has tried it out and could give your thoughts about it compared to phpmyadmin. could it replace phpmyadmin completely? thanks in advance

  Read the article

• MYSQL - Selecting a specific date range to get "current" popular screensavers.

  - by Joe

  Let's say I have a screensaver website. I want to display the CURRENT top 100 screensavers on the front page of the website. What I mean is, "RECENT" top 100 screensavers. What would be an example query to do this? My current one is: SELECT * FROM tbl_screensavers WHERE WEEK(tbl_screensavers.DateAdded) = WEEK('".date("Y-m-d H:i:s",strtotime("-1 week"))."') ORDER BY tbl_screensavers.ViewsCount, tbl_screensavers.DateAdded This will select the most viewed ("tbl_screensavers.ViewsCount") screensavers that were added ("tbl_screensavers.DateAdded") in the last week. However, in some cases there are no screensavers, or less than 100 screensavers, submitted in that week. So, how can I perform a query which would select "RECENT" top 100 screensavers? Hopefully you have an idea of what I'm try to accomplish when I say "RECENT" or "CURRENT" top screensavers. -- aka. the most viewed, recently - not the most viewed, all-time.

  Read the article

• One table, need multiple values from different rows/tuples

  - by WmasterJ

  I have tables like: 'profile_values' userID | fid | value -------+---------+------- 1 | 3 | [email protected] 1 | 45 | 203-234-2345 3 | 3 | [email protected] 1 | 45 | 123-456-7890 And: 'users' userID | name -------+------- 1 | joe 2 | jane 3 | jake I want to join them and have one row with two of the values like: 'profile_values' userID | name | email | phone -------+-------+----------------+-------------- 1 | joe | [email protected] | 203-234-2345 2 | jane | [email protected] | 123-456-7890 I have solved it but it feels clumsy and I want to know if there is a better way to do it. Meaning solutions that are either more readable or faster(optimized) or simply best-practice. Current solution: multiple tables selected, many conditional statements: SELECT u.userID AS memberid, u.name AS first_name, pv1.value AS fname, pv2.value as lname FROM users AS u, profile_values AS pv1, profile_values AS pv2, WHERE u.userID = pv1.userID AND pv1.fid = 3 AND u.userID = pv2.userID AND pv2.fid = 45; Thanks for the help!

  Read the article

• RavenDB-Embedded Unstable In Cooperation With ASP .Net Web API Using 2-Tier Architecture

  - by Mohsen Alikhani

  My application is used RavenDB-Embedded Unstable 1.2.2127 that it's intracted with ASP .Net Web API in the separated assemblies. When I use "UseEmbeddedHttpServer = true" on the document store, first time I send a request to RavenDB, it executes properly but when I try for the second time my application displays Raven Studio. However, if UseEmbeddedServer setting be removed then my application will be running without any problems. My RavenDB is configured with the following codes in data tier : this.documentStore = new EmbeddableDocumentStore { ConnectionStringName = "RavenDB", UseEmbeddedHttpServer = true } and implementation of Web.config have these settings in the service tier : <connectionStrings> <add name="RavenDB" connectionString="~\App_Data\RavenDatabase" /> </connectionStrings> Is there a setting I missed?

  Read the article

• Local Report vs Server report in ASP .Net Report viewer control.

  - by Raja

  Hello All, In one of the ASP .Net site we are currently working we have a bulk load of SSRS reports. We have forms authentication for the site and reports have already been created and deployed in the report server. We are having so many problems with authentication when we set the report viewer control to access the server report. I just want to know what are the advantages or disadvantages of using Local report vs Server Report Thanks, Raja

  Read the article

• Self-referencing tables in Linq2Sql

  - by J-Man

  Hi, I've seen a lot of questions on self-referencing tables in Linq2Sql and how to eagerly load all child records for a particular root object. I've implemented a temporary solution by accessing all underlying properties, but you can see that this doesn't do the performance any good. The thing is though, that all records are correlated with each-other using a correlation GUID. Example below: RootElement - Id: 1 - ParentId: null - CorrelationId: 4D68E512-4B55-44f4-BA5A-174B630A03DD ChildElement1 - Id: 2 - ParentId: 1 - CorrelationId: 4D68E512-4B55-44f4-BA5A-174B630A03DD ChildElement2 - Id: 3 - ParentId: 2 - CorrelationId: 4D68E512-4B55-44f4-BA5A-174B630A03DD ChildElement1 - Id: 4 - ParentId: 2 - CorrelationId: 4D68E512-4B55-44f4-BA5A-174B630A03DD In my case, I do have access to the correlationId, so I can retrieve all of my records by performing the following query: from element in db.Elements where element.CorrelationId == '4D68E512-4B55-44f4-BA5A-174B630A03DD' select element; But, of course, I want these elements associated with each other by executing this query: from element in db.Elements where element.CorrelationId == '4D68E512-4B55-44f4-BA5A-174B630A03DD' && element.ParentId == null select element; My question is: is it possible to combine the results the first query as some sort of 'caching mechanism' for the query where I get the root element? Thanks for the input. J.

  Read the article

• Django query: Count and Group BY

  - by Tyler Lane

  I have a query that I'm trying to figure the "django" way of doing it: I want to take the last 100 calls from Call. Which is easy: calls = Call.objects.all().order_by('-call_time')[:100] However the next part I can't find the way to do it via django's ORM. I want to get a list of the call_types and the number of calls each one has WITHIN that previous queryset i just did. Normally i would do a query like this: "SELECT COUNT(id),calltype FROM call WHERE id IN ( SELECT id FROM call ORDER BY call_time DESC LIMIT 100 ) GROUP BY calltype;" I can't seem to find the django way of doing this particular query. Here are my 2 models: class Call( models.Model ): call_time = models.DateTimeField( "Call Time", auto_now = False, auto_now_add = False ) description = models.CharField( max_length = 150 ) response = models.CharField( max_length = 50 ) event_num = models.CharField( max_length = 20 ) report_num = models.CharField( max_length = 20 ) address = models.CharField( max_length = 150 ) zip_code = models.CharField( max_length = 10 ) geom = models.PointField(srid=4326) calltype = models.ForeignKey(CallType) objects = models.GeoManager() class CallType( models.Model ): name = models.CharField( max_length = 50 ) description = models.CharField( max_length = 150 ) active = models.BooleanField() time_init = models.DateTimeField( "Date Added", auto_now = False, auto_now_add = True ) objects = models.Manager()

  Read the article

• Berkeley DB java edition, any LGPL or BSD alternatives in Java?

  - by Ali

  Hi All, I am dealing with a huge dataset consisting of key-value pairs. The queries are always in the form of range queries on the key space (keys are numbers) hence any persistent B-Tree like structure will handle the situation. I would like to use BDB-Java Edition but the product is closed source and my company doesn't want to buy BDB-JE License. I am wondering, would you please share your experience with any non-GPL java based key-value storage system. Thanks, -A

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852  | Next Page >