Search Results

Search found 3251 results on 131 pages for 'firewall'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 9/131 | < Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >

  • How to get remote firewall administration working with Windows Server Core 2008 R2?

    - by Daniel15
    I'm setting up a Windows Server Core 2008 R2 installation in a VMware virtual machine before setting it up on a live VPS. I've gotten remote administration via MMC working on my computer (a PC running Windows 7) for things like event logs, but I can't seem to get the firewall administration working. No matter what I do, I get the following error mesage: You do not have the correct permissions to open the Windows Firewall with Advanced Security console. You must be a member of the Administrators group or the Network Operators group to perform this task. For more information, contact you system administrator. Error code: 0x5. I've used cmdkey to add valid server credentials on my computer, and enabled remote management with the following commands: netsh advfirewall firewall set rule group="remote administration" new enable=yes netsh advfirewall firewall set rule group="windows firewall remote management" new enable=yes netsh advfirewall set currentprofile settings remotemanagement enable I am not running on a domain (just a workgroup), this is the only Windows Server 2008 computer I have. I've tried turning off the firewall completely, but remote administration is still failing How do I debug this issue? Does anyone know how to fix it? I found a few forum topics about it (eg. Remotely managing Windows Firewall on Server Core gives access denied (error 0x5) on Windows Server TechCenter) but they didn't help (I've already tried most of the fixes listed).

    Read the article

  • Interesting issue with WCF wsHttpBinding through a Firewall

    - by Marko
    I have a web application deployed in an internet hosting provider. This web application consumes a WCF Service deployed at an IIS server located at my company’s application server, in order to have data access to the company’s database, the network guys allowed me to expose this WCF service through a firewall for security reasons. A diagram would look like this. [Hosted page] --- (Internet) --- |Firewall <Public IP>:<Port-X >| --- [IIS with WCF Service <Comp. Network Ip>:<Port-Y>] link text I also wanted to use wsHttpBinding to take advantage of its security features, and encrypt sensible information. After trying it out I get the following error: Exception Details: System.ServiceModel.EndpointNotFoundException: The message with To 'http://<IP>:<Port>/service/WCFService.svc' cannot be processed at the receiver, due to an AddressFilter mismatch at the EndpointDispatcher. Check that the sender and receiver's EndpointAddresses agree. Doing some research I found out that wsHttpBinding uses WS-Addressing standards, and reading about this standard I learned that the SOAP header is enhanced to include tags like ‘MessageID’, ‘ReplyTo’, ‘Action’ and ‘To’. So I’m guessing that, because the client application endpoint specifies the Firewall IP address and Port, and the service replies with its internal network address which is different from the Firewall’s IP, then WS-Addressing fires the above message. Which I think it’s a very good security measure, but it’s not quite useful in my scenario. Quoting the WS-Addressing standard submission (http://www.w3.org/Submission/ws-addressing/) "Due to the range of network technologies currently in wide-spread use (e.g., NAT, DHCP, firewalls), many deployments cannot assign a meaningful global URI to a given endpoint. To allow these ‘anonymous’ endpoints to initiate message exchange patterns and receive replies, WS-Addressing defines the following well-known URI for use by endpoints that cannot have a stable, resolvable URI. http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing/role/anonymous" HOW can I configure my wsHttpBinding Endpoint to address my Firewall’s IP and to ignore or bypass the address specified in the ‘To’ WS-Addressing tag in the SOAP message header? Or do I have to change something in my service endpoint configuration? Help and guidance will be much appreciated. Marko. P.S.: While I find any solution to this, I’m using basicHttpBinding with absolutely no problem of course.

    Read the article

  • Which ports to open on host firewall so that network printing and scanning works?

    - by George Pligor
    I have a multi-functional machine which is both a laser printer and a scanner (Samsung SC-4705ND) I am not able to make the scanner work with the (software) firewall installed in my computer turned on. Operating system is ubuntu 12.04 with regular firewall. if firewall is turned off then everything works as expected I run nmap to discover open services on the samsung machine and I opened all these ports: 80, 427, 515, 631, 5200, 9100, 10001 but with not luck.. How should I configure firewall?

    Read the article

  • Linux service --status-all shows "Firewall is stopped." what service does firewall refer to?

    - by codewaggle
    I have a development server with the lamp stack running CentOS: [Prompt]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.8 (Final) [Prompt]# cat /proc/version Linux version 2.6.18-308.16.1.el5xen ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-52)) #1 SMP Tue Oct 2 22:50:05 EDT 2012 [Prompt]# yum info iptables Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.anl.gov * extras: centos.mirrors.tds.net * rpmfusion-free-updates: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * updates: mirror.steadfast.net Installed Packages Name : iptables Arch : x86_64 Version : 1.3.5 Release : 9.1.el5 Size : 661 k Repo : installed .... Snip.... When I run: service --status-all Part of the output looks like this: .... Snip.... httpd (pid xxxxx) is running... Firewall is stopped. Table: filter Chain INPUT (policy DROP) num target prot opt source destination 1 RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Chain FORWARD (policy DROP) num target prot opt source destination 1 RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) num target prot opt source destination Chain RH-Firewall-1-INPUT (2 references) ....Snip.... iptables has been loaded to the kernel and is active as represented by the rules being displayed. Checking just the iptables returns the rules just like status all does: [Prompt]# service iptables status Table: filter Chain INPUT (policy DROP) num target prot opt source destination 1 RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Chain FORWARD (policy DROP) num target prot opt source destination 1 RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) num target prot opt source destination Chain RH-Firewall-1-INPUT (2 references) .... Snip.... Starting or restarting iptables indicates that the iptables have been loaded to the kernel successfully: [Prompt]# service iptables restart Flushing firewall rules: [ OK ] Setting chains to policy ACCEPT: filter [ OK ] Unloading iptables modules: [ OK ] Applying iptables firewall rules: [ OK ] Loading additional iptables modules: ip_conntrack_netbios_n[ OK ] [Prompt]# service iptables start Flushing firewall rules: [ OK ] Setting chains to policy ACCEPT: filter [ OK ] Unloading iptables modules: [ OK ] Applying iptables firewall rules: [ OK ] Loading additional iptables modules: ip_conntrack_netbios_n[ OK ] I've googled "Firewall is stopped." and read a number of iptables guides as well as the RHEL documentation, but no luck. As far as I can tell, there isn't a "Firewall" service, so what is the line "Firewall is stopped." referring to?

    Read the article

  • How to enable ufw firewall to allow icmp response?

    - by Jeremy Hajek
    I have a series of Ubuntu 10.04 servers and each one has ufw firewall enabled. I have allowed port 22 (for SSH) and 80 (if it's a webserver). My question is that I am trying to enable icmp echo response (ping reply). ICMP functions differently than other protocols--I know it is below the IP level in a technical sense. You can just type sudo ufw allow 22, but you cannot type sudo ufw allow icmp How should attack this problem?

    Read the article

  • ???????/???Oracle Database Firewall???????????

    - by user788995
    ????? ??:2012/05/14 ??:??????/?? Oracle Database Firewall????????????????????????????????????????????????????????SQL??????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????Oracle Database Firewall ??????????????????? Oracle Database FirewallOracle Database Firewall ???~???????????????????????Oracle Database Firewall ?????????? ????????? ????????????????? http://otndnld.oracle.co.jp/ondemand/otn-seminar/movie/D3-33.wmv http://otndnld.oracle.co.jp/ondemand/otn-seminar/movie/mp4/D3-33.mp4 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/jp/ondemand/database/db-technique/d3-33-dl-1626602-ja.pdf

    Read the article

  • ???????/???Oracle Database Firewall???????????

    - by user788995
    ????? ??:2012/05/14 ??:??????/?? Oracle Database Firewall????????????????????????????????????????????????????????SQL??????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????Oracle Database Firewall ??????????????????? Oracle Database FirewallOracle Database Firewall ???~???????????????????????Oracle Database Firewall ?????????? ????????? ????????????????? http://otndnld.oracle.co.jp/ondemand/otn-seminar/movie/D3-33.wmv http://otndnld.oracle.co.jp/ondemand/otn-seminar/movie/mp4/D3-33.mp4 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/jp/ondemand/database/db-technique/d3-33-dl-1626602-ja.pdf

    Read the article

  • Config Server Firewall: Spamming my email | lfd on localhost: Suspicious process running under user www-data

    - by Henry Hoggard
    I have just installed and configured CSF and I am getting 100s of spam emails containing this message. lfd on localhost: Suspicious process running under user www-data Time: Wed May 23 01:05:52 2012 +0200 PID: 8503 Account: www-data Uptime: 118 seconds Executable: /usr/lib/apache2/mpm-prefork/apache2 Command Line (often faked in exploits): /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start Network connections by the process (if any): tcp6: 0.0.0.0:80 -> 0.0.0.0:0 Files open by the process (if any): Does anyone know how to fix?

    Read the article

  • Block Google requests to 16k using pf firewall

    - by atmosx
    I'd like to block access to Google search using PF after the threshold of 17500 requests (connection established) in 24h, from a host running FreeBSD 9. What I came up with, after reading pf-faq is this rule: pass out on $net proto tcp from any to 'www.google.com' port www flags S/SA keep state (max-src-conn 200, max-src-conn-rate 17500/86400) NOTE: 86400 are 24h in seconds. The rule should work, but PF is smart enough to know that www.google.com resolves in 5 different IPs. So my pfctl -sr output gives me this: pass out on vte0 inet proto tcp from any to 173.194.44.81 port = http flags S/SA keep state (source-track rule, max-src-conn 200, max-src-conn-rate 17500/86400, src.track 86400) pass out on vte0 inet proto tcp from any to 173.194.44.82 port = http flags S/SA keep state (source-track rule, max-src-conn 200, max-src-conn-rate 17500/86400, src.track 86400) pass out on vte0 inet proto tcp from any to 173.194.44.83 port = http flags S/SA keep state (source-track rule, max-src-conn 200, max-src-conn-rate 17500/86400, src.track 86400) pass out on vte0 inet proto tcp from any to 173.194.44.80 port = http flags S/SA keep state (source-track rule, max-src-conn 200, max-src-conn-rate 17500/86400, src.track 86400) pass out on vte0 inet proto tcp from any to 173.194.44.84 port = http flags S/SA keep state (source-track rule, max-src-conn 200, max-src-conn-rate 17500/86400, src.track 86400) PF creates 5 different rules, 1 for each IP that Google resolves. However I have the sense - without being 100% sure, I didn't had the chance to test it - that the number 17500/86400 applies for each IP. If that's the case - please confirm - then it's not what I want. In pf-faq there's another option called source-track-global: source-track This option enables the tracking of number of states created per source IP address. This option has two formats: + source-track rule - The maximum number of states created by this rule is limited by the rule's max-src-nodes and max-src-states options. Only state entries created by this particular rule count toward the rule's limits. + source-track global - The number of states created by all rules that use this option is limited. Each rule can specify different max-src-nodes and max-src-states options, however state entries created by any participating rule count towards each individual rule's limits. The total number of source IP addresses tracked globally can be controlled via the src-nodes runtime option. I tried to apply source-track-global in the above rule without success. How can I use this option in order to achieve my goal? Any thoughts or comments are more than welcome since I'm an amateur and don't fully understand PF yet. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Windows Server firewall asking for advice

    - by George2
    Hello everyone, I have Windows Server 2003/2008 machine, and I deployed some application on this machine. I want to put this machine in a sandbox environment, which means I want this machine to be able to access only proxy/gateway, its private used SQL Server database server, and I want to avoid network access from this machine to other machines in lab server room. Any easy solutions? BTW: my current environment is, I have a server which runs some Beta software in a Lab server room. It connects internet through proxy/gateway. Since the software is Beta, I want to reduce the risk of being hacked from internet and controlled by hacking sofwtare to attack my other servers in the same Lab server. thanks in advance, George

    Read the article

  • Export firewall rules on Juniper SSG-550

    - by Gumble
    I'd like to export all the policies set up in my Juniper SSG-550 running JunOS 5.1 but i can't find any way to do so. Preferably in an easy to parse format (csv would be great). Problem is the firmware is awfully outdated and I only have access to the webGUI, maybe there's a way to do that through the serial port but I just can't have acces to it. Thanks in advance !

    Read the article

  • firehol (firewall) with bridge: how to filter

    - by Leon
    I have two interfaces: eth0 (public address) and lxcbr0 with 10.0.3.1. I have a LXC guest running with ip 10.0.3.10 This is my firehol config: version 5 trusted_ips=`/usr/local/bin/strip_comments /etc/firehol/trusted_ips` trusted_servers=`/usr/local/bin/strip_comments /etc/firehol/trusted_servers` blacklist full `/usr/local/bin/strip_comments /etc/firehol/blacklist` interface lxcbr0 virtual policy return server "dhcp dns" accept router virtual2internet inface lxcbr0 outface eth0 masquerade route all accept interface any world protection strong #Outgoing these protocols are allowed to everywhere client "smtp pop3 dns ntp mysql icmp" accept #These (incoming) services are available to everyone server "http https smtp ftp imap imaps pop3 pop3s passiveftp" accept #Outgoing, these protocols are only allowed to known servers client "http https webcache ftp ssh pyzor razor" accept dst "${trusted_servers}" On my host I can connect only to "trusted servers" on port 80. In my guest I can connect to port 80 on every host. I assumed that firehol would block that. Is there something I can add/change so that my guest(s) inherit the rules of the eth0 interface?

    Read the article

  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a hosted firewall?

    - by Roy
    Would you rather have your firewall hosted or in house if you've got the skills to manage it? We currently have 6 remote offices and 2 different ISP's, one private network and our firewall (Watchguard, licenses are due to expire) is also our main gateway. I don't see how a hosted firewall (in this case Fortinet) is going to work for us especially when it's cheaper to buy our own firewall and the transition from one ISP to a new provider will take some time because our current contracts aren't due to expire soon. What are to pros and cons of having a firewall hosted by your ISP in general?

    Read the article

  • Debian - starting UFW (Uncomplicated Firewall) before network interfaces are operational

    - by Tomasz Zielinski
    I want to install UFW on Debian Lenny. Everything looks straightforward except that I don't know where to plug UFW startup script so that it configures iptables before hax0rs can break in. I've reviewed runlevel directories and in /etc/rc0.d, /etc/rc6.d and /etc/rcS.d there are items like these: S35networking -> ../init.d/networking S36ifupdown -> ../init.d/ifupdown Runlevel 0 and 6 are for shutdown and reboot so I guess nothing should be changed there, but runlevel S advertises itself (in README) like something for me: The scripts in this directory whose names begin with an 'S' are executed once when booting the system, even when booting directly into single user mode. The following sequence points are defined at this time: * After the S40 scripts have executed, all local file systems are mounted and networking is available. All device drivers have been initialized. (What bothers me is that both rc0/6.d and rcS.d point to the same networking and ifupdown scripts, but after looking at sources I believe those scripts are smart enough to figure out where to start and where to stop networking.) Now, I think that I should plug my /lib/ufw/ufw-init into /etc/rcS.d, with priority higher that the one of ifupdown and networking, i.e. <= 38 for my /etc/rcS.d. Am I right in this "analysis" ?

    Read the article

  • OpenBSD in a virtual box as a firewall

    - by Ali
    Is there any merit in installing a virtual machine with OpenBSD and pf (or any other simple and secure OS + iptable) on a mac laptop and routing all the traffic through that machine? I read a similar set up for corporate laptops running windows (I thing I read this in BSD magazine). They claim that Windows machines are too hard to secure and if you are taking them to the wild (public wireless, hotels, ...) you'd better but a secure OS in between! If you think this is a good idea, how you route all the traffic on a mac through the virtual machine and prevent any application or service to go directly? I am not sure if just setting the gateway will do that, what about DNS? you don't want anybody to fool you with DNS cache poisoning or similar attacks either.

    Read the article

  • Configuring my Linux firewall for Tomcat

    - by David Pinn
    I'm following some instructions for Installing Tomcat. They require me to add the following line to my iptables file: -A RH-Lokkit-0-50-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8080 --syn -j ACCEPT Having carefully read the man page for iptables, I have learned what the parameters do, except for the first one. What does -A RH-Lokkit-0-50-INPUT do, and can you confirm that it is sensible in this case?

    Read the article

  • Eventlog entry for allowed connection in Windows Firewall

    - by Jaap
    I was seeing a lot of entries in the eventlog: The Windows Filtering Platform has permitted a connection. Application Information: Process ID: 4 Application Name: System Network Information: Direction: Inbound Source Address: 10.xxx.xxx.xxx Source Port: 80 Destination Address: 10.xxx.xxx.xxx Destination Port: 31773 Protocol: 6 Filter Information: Filter Run-Time ID: 67903 Layer Name: Receive/Accept Layer Run-Time ID: 44 We have a loadbalancer which checks every second to see if the application is still running (a health check). The logs contain large amounts of this kind of entries, which makes the Event Viewer slow and it's difficult to find the more interesting logs. How do I make sure these messages don't end up in the event logs?

    Read the article

  • Can't Allow Specific Port in Windows Firewall Advanced Security - Windows 2008

    - by Jody
    In the Outbound Rules, I set up a rule to allow outbound connection from port 26. But, it doesn't work. However, if I allow "all port" for this rule, this will work, but then all ports will be allowed too. What is the reason? Is there any conflicting rule? I need to fix this as soon as possible. -Edit to add : I'm trying to allow email access to mail server outside (port 26). The thing is, even if I telnet using port 26, it will not work, unless I allow "all ports". Specific port will not do.

    Read the article

  • Firewall still blocking port 53 despite listing otherwise?

    - by Tom
    I have 3 nodes with virtually the same iptables rules loaded from a bash script, but one particular node is blocking traffic on port 53 despite listing it's accepting it: $ iptables --list -v Chain INPUT (policy DROP 8886 packets, 657K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 0 0 ACCEPT all -- lo any anywhere anywhere 2 122 ACCEPT icmp -- any any anywhere anywhere icmp echo-request 20738 5600K ACCEPT all -- any any anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- eth1 any anywhere node1.com multiport dports http,smtp 0 0 ACCEPT udp -- eth1 any anywhere ns.node1.com udp dpt:domain 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- eth1 any anywhere ns.node1.com tcp dpt:domain 0 0 ACCEPT all -- eth0 any node2.backend anywhere 21 1260 ACCEPT all -- eth0 any node3.backend anywhere 0 0 ACCEPT all -- eth0 any node4.backend anywhere Chain FORWARD (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 15804 packets, 26M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination nmap -sV -p 53 ns.node1.com // From remote server Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2011-02-24 11:44 EST Interesting ports on ns.node1.com (1.2.3.4): PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 53/tcp filtered domain Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.336 seconds Any ideas? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Cisco PIX firewall blocking inbound Exchange email

    - by sumsaricum
    [Cisco PIX, SBS2003] I can telnet server port 25 from inside but not outside, hence all inbound email is blocked. (as an aside, inbox on iPhones do not list/update emails, but calendar works a charm) I'm inexperienced in Cisco PIX and looking for some assistance before mails start bouncing :/ interface ethernet0 auto interface ethernet1 100full nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif ethernet1 inside security100 hostname pixfirewall domain-name ciscopix.com fixup protocol dns maximum-length 512 fixup protocol ftp 21 fixup protocol h323 h225 1720 fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719 fixup protocol http 80 fixup protocol rsh 514 fixup protocol rtsp 554 fixup protocol sip 5060 fixup protocol sip udp 5060 fixup protocol skinny 2000 no fixup protocol smtp 25 fixup protocol sqlnet 1521 fixup protocol tftp 69 names name 192.168.1.10 SERVER access-list inside_outbound_nat0_acl permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.96 255.255.255.240 access-list outside_cryptomap_dyn_20 permit ip any 192.168.1.96 255.255.255.240 access-list outside_acl permit tcp any host 213.xxx.xxx.xxx eq 3389 access-list outside_acl permit tcp any interface outside eq ftp access-list outside_acl permit tcp any host 213.xxx.xxx.xxx eq https access-list outside_acl permit tcp any host 213.xxx.xxx.xxx eq www access-list outside_acl permit tcp any interface outside eq 993 access-list outside_acl permit tcp any interface outside eq imap4 access-list outside_acl permit tcp any interface outside eq 465 access-list outside_acl permit tcp any host 213.xxx.xxx.xxx eq smtp access-list outside_cryptomap_dyn_40 permit ip any 192.168.1.96 255.255.255.240 access-list COMPANYVPN_splitTunnelAcl permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 any access-list COMPANY_splitTunnelAcl permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 any access-list outside_cryptomap_dyn_60 permit ip any 192.168.1.96 255.255.255.240 access-list COMPANY_VPN_splitTunnelAcl permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 any access-list outside_cryptomap_dyn_80 permit ip any 192.168.1.96 255.255.255.240 pager lines 24 icmp permit host 217.157.xxx.xxx outside mtu outside 1500 mtu inside 1500 ip address outside 213.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.128 ip address inside 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip audit info action alarm ip audit attack action alarm ip local pool VPN 192.168.1.100-192.168.1.110 pdm location 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.128 outside pdm location 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 inside pdm location 217.yyy.yyy.yyy 255.255.255.255 outside pdm location SERVER 255.255.255.255 inside pdm logging informational 100 pdm history enable arp timeout 14400 global (outside) 1 interface nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_outbound_nat0_acl nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 static (inside,outside) tcp 213.xxx.xxx.xxx 3389 SERVER 3389 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 static (inside,outside) tcp 213.xxx.xxx.xxx smtp SERVER smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 static (inside,outside) tcp 213.xxx.xxx.xxx https SERVER https netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 static (inside,outside) tcp 213.xxx.xxx.xxx www SERVER www netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 static (inside,outside) tcp interface imap4 SERVER imap4 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 static (inside,outside) tcp interface 993 SERVER 993 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 static (inside,outside) tcp interface 465 SERVER 465 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 static (inside,outside) tcp interface ftp SERVER ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 access-group outside_acl in interface outside route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 213.zzz.zzz.zzz timeout xlate 0:05:00 timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 rpc 0:10:00 h225 1:00:00 timeout h323 0:05:00 mgcp 0:05:00 sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 timeout sip-disconnect 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute aaa-server TACACS+ protocol tacacs+ aaa-server TACACS+ max-failed-attempts 3 aaa-server TACACS+ deadtime 10 aaa-server RADIUS protocol radius aaa-server RADIUS max-failed-attempts 3 aaa-server RADIUS deadtime 10 aaa-server RADIUS (inside) host SERVER *** timeout 10 aaa-server LOCAL protocol local http server enable http 217.yyy.yyy.yyy 255.255.255.255 outside http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside no snmp-server location no snmp-server contact snmp-server community public no snmp-server enable traps floodguard enable sysopt connection permit-ipsec crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 esp-3des esp-md5-hmac crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 20 match address outside_cryptomap_dyn_20 crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 20 set transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 40 match address outside_cryptomap_dyn_40 crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 40 set transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 60 match address outside_cryptomap_dyn_60 crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 60 set transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 80 match address outside_cryptomap_dyn_80 crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 80 set transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 crypto map outside_map 65535 ipsec-isakmp dynamic outside_dyn_map crypto map outside_map client authentication RADIUS LOCAL crypto map outside_map interface outside isakmp enable outside isakmp policy 20 authentication pre-share isakmp policy 20 encryption 3des isakmp policy 20 hash md5 isakmp policy 20 group 2 isakmp policy 20 lifetime 86400 telnet 217.yyy.yyy.yyy 255.255.255.255 outside telnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside telnet timeout 5 ssh 217.yyy.yyy.yyy 255.255.255.255 outside ssh 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 inside ssh timeout 5 management-access inside console timeout 0 dhcpd address 192.168.1.20-192.168.1.40 inside dhcpd dns SERVER 195.184.xxx.xxx dhcpd wins SERVER dhcpd lease 3600 dhcpd ping_timeout 750 dhcpd auto_config outside dhcpd enable inside : end I have Kiwi SysLog running but could use some pointers in that regard to narrow down the torrent of log messages, if that helps?!

    Read the article

  • Can Firewall or Specific Software Server Tools Blocked PHP [closed]

    - by Kaii
    im using php scritps to upload file from my pc to our developments server the problem is after a hours my scripts seems doesn`t work or something is blocking it to upload images file.. our office as a new firewalll system application that allows to block applications and others is this connected to what ive encountered now? because script even the previous system scripts for uploading image that i created failed to work .. They just uploading the image with 0kb.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >