Search Results

Search found 867 results on 35 pages for 'leak'.

Page 9/35 | < Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >

• NSMutableArray for Object which has NSString property causes memory leak

  - by user262325

  Hello everyone I hope to add objects to a NSMutableArray "myArray", The NSMutableArray is the array for FileObj which has a NSString property "fileName" #import <UIKit/UIKit.h> @interface FileObj : NSObject { NSString *fileName; } -(void) setfileName:(NSString *)s ; -(NSString *) getfileName ; @end // // File.m// #import "File.h" @implementation FileObj -(void) setfileName:(NSString *)s ; { fileName=s; } -(NSString *) getfileName ; { return fileName; } @end I initialize the myArray here: NSMutableArray *temarray; temarray=[[NSMutableArray alloc] init]; self.myArray=temarray; [temarray release]; the codes to add object to myArray FileObj *newobj=[[FileObj alloc]init ]; NSString *fieldValue2 = [[NSString alloc] initWithUTF8String:@"aaaa"]; [newobj setfileName:fieldValue2]; [myArray addObject:newobj]; [fieldValue2 release]; //**if I enabled the line, it will cause crash** //**if I disable the line, it will cause memory leak** [newobj release]; Welcome any comment Thanks interdev

  Read the article

• Jquery plugin seems to leak memory no matter what I do

  - by ddombrow

  I've recently been tasked with ferreting out some memory leaks in an application for my work. I've narrowed down one of the big leaks to a jquery plugin. It appears we're using a modified version of a popular context menu jquery plugin. It looks like one of the developers before me attempted to add a destroy method. I noticed it wasn't very well written and attempted to rewrite. Here's the meat of my destroy method: if (menu.childMenus) { for (var i = 0; i < menu.childMenus.length; i++) { $(menu.childMenus[i]).destroy(menu.childMenus[i], 'contextmenu'); } } var recursiveUnbind = function(node) { $(node).unbind(); //$(node).empty().remove(); $.each(node, function(obj) { recursiveUnbind(obj); }); }; $.each(menu, function() { recursiveUnbind(menu); }); $(menu).empty().remove(); In my mind this code should blow away all the jquery event binding and remove the dom elements, yet still the plugin leaks gobs of memory in IE7. The modified plugin with a test page can be found here: http://www.olduglyhead.com/jquery/leaks/ Clicking the button repeatedly will cause IE7 to leak a bunch of memory.

  Read the article

• Where's my memory?! Nginx + PHP-FPM front end webserver slows to a crawl...

  - by incredimike

  I'm not sure if I have a problem with a memory leak (as my hosting company suggests), or if we both need to read http://linuxatemyram.com. Maybe you clever people can help us out? This is a front-end webserver VM running essentially only nginx & php-fpm on RHEL 5.5. This server is powering Magento, a PHP eCommerce thinggy. The server is running in a shared environment, but we're changing that soon. Anyway.. after a reboot the server runs just fine, but within a day it will grind itself into nothingness. Pages will take literally 2 minutes to load, CPU spikes like crazy, etc.. The console is even sluggish when I SSH in. It's like my whole server is being brought to its knees. I've also been monitoring the DB server via top and tcpdumping incoming traffic. The DB stays idle for a good portion of that "slow" load time. When i start seeing queries coming from the front-end server, the page loads soon afterward. Here are some stats after me logging in during a slow-down, after restarting php-fpm: [mike@front01 ~]$ free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 5963 5217 745 0 192 314 -/+ buffers/cache: 4711 1252 Swap: 4047 4 4042 [mike@front01 ~]$ top top - 11:38:55 up 2 days, 1:01, 3 users, load average: 0.06, 0.17, 0.21 Tasks: 131 total, 1 running, 130 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu0 : 0.0%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.3%id, 0.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Cpu1 : 0.3%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Cpu2 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Cpu3 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 6106800k total, 5361288k used, 745512k free, 199960k buffers Swap: 4144728k total, 4976k used, 4139752k free, 328480k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 31806 apache 15 0 601m 120m 37m S 0.0 2.0 0:22.23 php-fpm 31805 apache 15 0 549m 66m 31m S 0.0 1.1 0:14.54 php-fpm 31809 apache 16 0 547m 65m 32m S 0.0 1.1 0:12.84 php-fpm 32285 apache 15 0 546m 63m 33m S 0.0 1.1 0:09.22 php-fpm 32373 apache 15 0 546m 62m 32m S 0.0 1.1 0:09.66 php-fpm 31808 apache 16 0 543m 60m 35m S 0.0 1.0 0:18.93 php-fpm 31807 apache 16 0 533m 49m 30m S 0.0 0.8 0:08.93 php-fpm 32092 apache 15 0 535m 48m 27m S 0.0 0.8 0:06.67 php-fpm 4392 root 18 0 194m 10m 7184 S 0.0 0.2 0:06.96 cvd 4064 root 15 0 154m 8304 4220 S 0.0 0.1 3:55.57 snmpd 4394 root 15 0 119m 5660 2944 S 0.0 0.1 0:02.84 EvMgrC 31804 root 15 0 519m 5180 932 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.46 php-fpm 4138 ntp 15 0 23396 5032 3904 S 0.0 0.1 0:02.38 ntpd 643 nginx 15 0 95276 4408 1524 S 0.0 0.1 0:01.15 nginx 5131 root 16 0 90128 3340 2600 S 0.0 0.1 0:01.41 sshd 28467 root 15 0 90128 3340 2600 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.35 sshd 32602 root 16 0 90128 3332 2600 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.36 sshd 1614 root 16 0 90128 3308 2588 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.02 sshd 2817 root 5 -10 7216 3140 1724 S 0.0 0.1 0:03.80 iscsid 4161 root 15 0 66948 2340 800 S 0.0 0.0 0:10.35 sendmail 1617 nicole 17 0 53876 2000 1516 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 sftp-server ... Is there anything else I should be looking at, or any more information that might be useful? I'm just a developer, but the slowdowns on this system worry me and make it hard to do my work.. Help me out, ServerFault!

  Read the article

• Memory leak on CollectionView.View.Refresh

  - by Dabblernl

  I have defined my binding thus: <TreeView ItemsSource="{Binding UsersView.View}" ItemTemplate="{StaticResource MyDataTemplate}" /> The CollectionViewSource is defined thus: private ObservableCollection<UserData> users; public CollectionViewSource UsersView{get;set;} UsersView=new CollectionViewSource{Source=users}; UsersView.SortDescriptions.Add( new SortDescription("IsLoggedOn",ListSortDirection.Descending); UsersView.SortDescriptions.Add( new SortDescription("Username",ListSortDirection.Ascending); So far, so good, this works as expected: The view shows first the users that are logged on in alphabetical order, then the ones that are not. However, the IsLoggedIn property of the UserData is updated every few seconds by a backgroundworker thread and then the code calls: UsersView.View.Refresh(); on the UI thread. Again this works as expected: users that log on are moved from the bottom of the view to the top and vice versa. However: Every time I call the Refresh method on the view the application hoards 3,5MB of extra memory, which is only released after application shutdown (or after an OutOfMemoryException...) I did some research and below is a list of fixes that did NOT work: The UserData class implements INotifyPropertyChanged Changing the underlying users collection does not make any difference at all: any IENumerable<UserData as a source for the CollectionViewSource causes the problem. -Changing the ColletionViewSource to a List<UserData (and refreshing the binding) or inheriting from ObservableCollection to get access to the underlying Items collection to sort that in place does not work. I am out of ideas! Help? EDIT: I found it: The Resource MyDataTemplate contains a Label that is bound to a UserData object to show one of its properties, the UserData objects being handed down by the TreeView's ItemsSource. The Label has a ContextMenu defined thus: <ContextMenu Background="Transparent" Width="325" Opacity=".8" HasDropShadow="True"> <PrivateMessengerUI:MyUserData IsReadOnly="True" > <PrivateMessengerUI:MyUserData.DataContext> <Binding Path="."/> </PrivateMessengerUI:MyUserData.DataContext> </PrivateMessengerUI:MyUserData> </ContextMenu> The MyUserData object is a UserControl that shows All properties of the UserData object. In this way the user first only sees one piece of data of a user and on a right click sees all of it. When I remove the MyUserData UserControl from the DataTemplate the memory leak disappears! How can I still implement the behaviour as specified above?

  Read the article

• Strange iPhone memory leak in xml parser

  - by Chris

  Update: I edited the code, but the problem persists... Hi everyone, this is my first post here - I found this place a great ressource for solving many of my questions. Normally I try my best to fix anything on my own but this time I really have no idea what goes wrong, so I hope someone can help me out. I am building an iPhone app that parses a couple of xml files using TouchXML. I have a class XMLParser, which takes care of downloading and parsing the results. I am getting memory leaks when I parse an xml file more than once with the same instance of XMLParser. Here is one of the parsing snippets (just the relevant part): for(int counter = 0; counter < [item childCount]; counter++) { CXMLNode *child = [item childAtIndex:counter]; if([[child name] isEqualToString:@"PRODUCT"]) { NSMutableDictionary *product = [[NSMutableDictionary alloc] init]; for(int j = 0; j < [child childCount]; j++) { CXMLNode *grandchild = [child childAtIndex:j]; if([[grandchild stringValue] length] > 1) { NSString *trimmedString = [[grandchild stringValue] stringByTrimmingCharactersInSet:[NSCharacterSet whitespaceAndNewlineCharacterSet]]; [product setObject:trimmedString forKey:[grandchild name]]; } } // Add product to current category array switch (categoryId) { case 0: [self.mobil addObject: product]; break; case 1: [self.allgemein addObject: product]; break; case 2: [self.besitzeIch addObject: product]; break; case 3: [self.willIch addObject: product]; break; default: break; } [product release]; } } The first time, I parse the xml no leak shows up in instruments, the next time I do so, I got a lot of leaks (NSCFString / NSCFDictionary). Instruments points me to this part inside CXMLNode.m, when I dig into a leaked object: theStringValue = [NSString stringWithUTF8String:(const char *)theXMLString]; if ( _node->type != CXMLTextKind ) xmlFree(theXMLString); } return(theStringValue); I really spent a long time and tried multiple approaches to fix this, but to no avail so far, maybe I am missing something essential? Any help is highly appreciated, thank you!

  Read the article

• mem-leak freeing g_strdup

  - by Mike

  I'm trying to free g_strdup but I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. Using valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=yes ./a.out I keep getting: ==4506== 40 bytes in 10 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 9 ==4506== at 0x4024C1C: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195) ==4506== by 0x40782E3: g_malloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x4090CA8: g_strdup (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x8048722: add_inv (dup.c:26) ==4506== by 0x80487E6: main (dup.c:47) ==4506== 504 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 4 of 9 ==4506== at 0x4023E2E: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:532) ==4506== by 0x4023E8B: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:660) ==4506== by 0x408D61D: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x408E5AC: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x4061628: g_hash_table_new_full (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x40616C7: g_hash_table_new (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x8048795: main (dup.c:42) I've tried different ways to freed but no success so far. I'll appreciate any help. Thanks BTW: It compiles and runs fine. #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <glib.h> #include <stdint.h> struct s { char *data; }; static GHashTable *hashtable1; static GHashTable *hashtable2; static void add_inv(GHashTable *table, const char *key) { gpointer old_value, old_key; gint value; if(g_hash_table_lookup_extended(table,key, &old_key, &old_value)){ value = GPOINTER_TO_INT(old_value); value = value + 2; /*g_free (old_key);*/ } else { value = 5; } g_hash_table_replace(table, g_strdup(key), GINT_TO_POINTER(value)); } static void print_hash_kv (gpointer key, gpointer value, gpointer user_data){ gchar *k = (gchar *) key; gchar *h = (gchar *) value; printf("%s: %d \n",k, h); } int main(int argc, char *argv[]){ struct s t; t.data = "bar"; int i,j; hashtable1 = g_hash_table_new(g_str_hash, g_str_equal); hashtable2 = g_hash_table_new(g_str_hash, g_str_equal); for(i=0;i<10;i++){ add_inv(hashtable1, t.data); add_inv(hashtable2, t.data); } /*free(t.data);*/ /*free(t.data);*/ g_hash_table_foreach (hashtable1, print_hash_kv, NULL); g_hash_table_foreach (hashtable2, print_hash_kv, NULL); g_hash_table_destroy(hashtable1); g_hash_table_destroy(hashtable2); return 0; }

  Read the article

• Gradual memory leak in loop over contents of QTMovie

  - by Benji XVI

  I have a simple foundation tool that exports every frame of a movie as a .tiff file. Here is the relevant code: NSString* movieLoc = [NSString stringWithCString:argv[1]]; QTMovie *sourceMovie = [QTMovie movieWithFile:movieLoc error:nil]; int i=0; while (QTTimeCompare([sourceMovie currentTime], [sourceMovie duration]) != NSOrderedSame) { // save image of movie to disk NSAutoreleasePool *arp = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init]; NSString *filePath = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"/somelocation_%d.tiff", i++]; NSData *currentImageData = [[sourceMovie currentFrameImage] TIFFRepresentation]; [currentImageData writeToFile:filePath atomically:NO]; NSLog(@"%@", filePath); [sourceMovie stepForward]; [arp release]; } [pool drain]; return 0; As you can see, in order to prevent very large memory buildups with the various transparently-autoreleased variables in the loop, we create, and flush, an autoreleasepool with every run through the loop. However, over the course of stepping through a movie, the amount of memory used by the program still gradually increases. Instruments is not detecting any memory leaks per se, but the object trace shows certain General Data blocks to be increasing in size. [Edited out reference to slowdown as it doesn't seem to be as much of a problem as I thought.] Edit: let's knock out some parts of the code inside the loop & see what we find out... Test 1 while (banana) { NSAutoreleasePool *arp = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init]; NSString *filePath = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"/somelocation_%d.tiff", i++]; NSLog(@"%@", filePath); [sourceMovie stepForward]; [arp release]; } Here we simply loop over the whole movie, creating the filename and logging it. Memory characteristics: remains at 15MB usage for the duration. Test 2 while (banana) { NSAutoreleasePool *arp = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init]; NSImage *image = [sourceMovie currentFrameImage]; [sourceMovie stepForward]; [arp release]; } Here we add back in the creation of the NSImage from the current frame. Memory characteristics: gradually increasing memory usage. RSIZE is at 60MB by frame 200; 75MB by f300. Test 3 while (banana) { NSAutoreleasePool *arp = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init]; NSImage *image = [sourceMovie currentFrameImage]; NSData *imageData = [image TIFFRepresentation]; [sourceMovie stepForward]; [arp release]; } We've added back in the creation of an NSData object from the NSImage. Memory characteristics: Memory usage is again increasing: 62MB at f200; 75MB at f300. In other words, largely identical. It looks like a memory leak in the underlying system QTMovie uses to do currentFrameImage, to me.

  Read the article

• Memory Leak with Swing Drag and Drop

  - by tom

  I have a JFrame that accepts top-level drops of files. However after a drop has occurred, references to the frame are held indefinitely inside some Swing internal classes. I believe that disposing of the frame should release all of its resources, so what am I doing wrong? Example import java.awt.datatransfer.DataFlavor; import java.io.File; import java.util.List; import javax.swing.JFrame; import javax.swing.JLabel; import javax.swing.TransferHandler; public class DnDLeakTester extends JFrame { public static void main(String[] args) { new DnDLeakTester(); //Prevent main from returning or the jvm will exit while (true) { try { Thread.sleep(10000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { } } } public DnDLeakTester() { super("I'm leaky"); add(new JLabel("Drop stuff here")); setTransferHandler(new TransferHandler() { @Override public boolean canImport(final TransferSupport support) { return (support.isDrop() && support .isDataFlavorSupported(DataFlavor.javaFileListFlavor)); } @Override public boolean importData(final TransferSupport support) { if (!canImport(support)) { return false; } try { final List<File> files = (List<File>) support.getTransferable().getTransferData(DataFlavor.javaFileListFlavor); for (final File f : files) { System.out.println(f.getName()); } } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } return true; } }); setDefaultCloseOperation(DISPOSE_ON_CLOSE); pack(); setVisible(true); } } To reproduce, run the code and drop some files on the frame. Close the frame so it's disposed of. To verify the leak I take a heap dump using JConsole and analyse it with the Eclipse Memory Analysis tool. It shows that sun.awt.AppContext is holding a reference to the frame through its hashmap. It looks like TransferSupport is at fault. What am I doing wrong? Should I be asking the DnD support code to clean itself up somehow? I'm running JDK 1.6 update 19.

  Read the article

• Yet another Memory Leak Issue (memory is still gone when program terminates)- C program on SLES

  - by user1426181

  I run my C program on Suse Linux Enterprise that compresses several thousand large files (between 10MB and 100MB in size), and the program gets slower and slower as the program runs (it's running multi-threaded with 32 threads on a Intel Sandy Bridge board). When the program completes, and it's run again, it's still very slow. When I watch the program running, I see that the memory is being depleted while the program runs, which you would think is just a classic memory leak problem. But, with a normal malloc()/free() mismatch, I would expect all the memory to return when the program terminates. But, most of the memory doesn't get reclaimed when the program completes. The free or top command shows Mem: 63996M total, 63724M used, 272M free when the program is slowed down to a halt, but, after the termination, the free memory only grows back to about 3660M. When the program is rerun, the free memory is quickly used up. The top program only shows that the program, while running, is using at most 4% or so of the memory. I thought that it might be a memory fragmentation problem, but, I built a small test program that simulates all the memory allocation activity in the program (many randomized aspects were built in - size/quantity), and it always returns all the memory upon completion. So, I don't think that's it. Questions: Can there be a malloc()/free() mismatch that will lose memory permanently, i.e. even after the process completes? What other things in a C program (not C++) can cause permanent memory loss, i.e. after the program completes, and even the terminal window closes? Only a reboot brings the memory back. I've read other posts about files not being closed causing problems, but, I don't think I have that problem. Is it valid to be looking at top and free for the memory statistics, i.e. do they accurately describe the memory situation? They do seem to correspond to the slowness of the program. If the program only shows a 4% memory usage, will something like valgrind find this problem?

  Read the article

• Retain count problem iphone sdk

  - by neha

  Hi all, I'm facing a memory leak problem which is like this: I'm allocating an object of class A in class B. // RETAIN COUNT OF CLASS A OBJECT BECOMES 1 I'm placing the object in an nsmutablearray. // RETAIN COUNT OF CLASS A OBJECT BECOMES 2 In an another class C, I'm grabbing this nsmutablearray, fetching all the elements in that array in a local nsmutablearray, releasing this first array of class B. // RETAIN COUNT OF CLASS A OBJECTS IN LOCAL ARRAY BECOMES 1 Now in this class C, I'm creating an object of class A and fetching the elements in local nsmutable array. //RETAIN COUNT OF NEW CLASS A OBJECT IN LOCAL ARRAY BECOMES 2 [ALLOCATION + FETCHED OBJECT WITH RETAIN COUNT 1] My question is, I want to retain this array which I'm displaying in tableview, and want to release it after new elements are filled in the array. I'm doing this in class B. So before adding new elements, I'm removing all the elements and releasing this array in class B. And in class C I'm releasing object of class A in dealloc. But in Instruments-Leaks it's showing me leak for this class A object in class C. Can anybody please tell me wheather where I'm going wrong. Thanx in advance.

  Read the article

• Setting synthesized arrays causing memory leaks using nested arrays

  - by webtoad

  Hello: Why is the following code causing a memory leak in an iPhone App? All of the initted objects below leak, including the arrays, the strings and the numbers. So, I'm thinking it has something to do with the the synthesized array property not releasing the object when I set the property again on the second and subsequent time this piece of code is called. Here is the code: "controller" (below) is my custom view controller class, which I have a reference to, and I am setting with this code snippet: sqlite3_stmt *statement; NSMutableArray *foo_IDs = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init]; NSMutableArray *foo_Names = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init]; NSMutableArray *foo_IDsBySection = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init]; NSMutableArray *foo_NamesBySection = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init]; // Get data: NSString *sql = @"select distinct p.foo_ID, p.foo_Name from foo as p "; if (sqlite3_prepare_v2(...) == SQLITE_OK) { while (sqlite3_step(statement) == SQLITE_ROW) { int p_id; NSString *foo_Name; p_id = sqlite3_column_int(statement, 0); char *str2 = (char *)sqlite3_column_text(statement, 1); foo_Name = [NSString stringWithCString:str2]; [foo_IDs addObject:[NSNumber numberWithInt:p_id]]; [foo_Names addObject:foo_Name]; } sqlite3_finalize(statement); } // Pass the array itself into another array: // (normally there is more than one array in each array) [foo_IDsBySection addObject: foo_IDs]; [foo_NamesBySection addObject: foo_Names]; [foo_IDs release]; [foo_Names release]; // Set some synthesized properties (of type NSArray, nonatomic, // retain) in controller: controller.foo_IDsBySection = foo_IDsBySection; controller.foo_NamesBySection = foo_NamesBySection; [foo_IDsBySection release]; [foo_NamesBySection release]; Thanks for any help!

  Read the article

• android database leak found IllegalStateException

  - by saravanan

  04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): Leak found 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): java.lang.IllegalStateException: mPrograms size 1 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteDatabase.finalize(SQLiteDatabase.java:1668) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at dalvik.system.NativeStart.run(Native Method) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: /data/data/com.example.search/databases/rlite.db SQLiteDatabase created and never closed 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteDatabase.(SQLiteDatabase.java:1694) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteDatabase.openDatabase(SQLiteDatabase.java:738) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteDatabase.openOrCreateDatabase(SQLiteDatabase.java:760) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteDatabase.openOrCreateDatabase(SQLiteDatabase.java:753) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.app.ApplicationContext.openOrCreateDatabase(ApplicationContext.java:473) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.content.ContextWrapper.openOrCreateDatabase(ContextWrapper.java:193) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteOpenHelper.getWritableDatabase(SQLiteOpenHelper.java:98) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at com.example.search.Database.(Database.java:33) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at com.example.search.JobDetails.applyJob(JobDetails.java:120) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at com.example.search.JobDetails.jobdetailsAction(JobDetails.java:98) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invokeNative(Native Method) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:521) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.view.View$1.onClick(View.java:2026) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.view.View.performClick(View.java:2364) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.view.View.onTouchEvent(View.java:4179) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.widget.TextView.onTouchEvent(TextView.java:6540) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.view.View.dispatchTouchEvent(View.java:3709) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchTouchEvent(ViewGroup.java:884) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchTouchEvent(ViewGroup.java:884) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchTouchEvent(ViewGroup.java:884) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchTouchEvent(ViewGroup.java:884) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchTouchEvent(ViewGroup.java:884) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at com.android.internal.policy.impl.PhoneWindow$DecorView.superDispatchTouchEvent(PhoneWindow.java:1659) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at com.android.internal.policy.impl.PhoneWindow.superDispatchTouchEvent(PhoneWindow.java:1107) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.app.Activity.dispatchTouchEvent(Activity.java:2061) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at com.android.internal.policy.impl.PhoneWindow$DecorView.dispatchTouchEvent(PhoneWindow.java:1643) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.view.ViewRoot.handleMessage(ViewRoot.java:1691) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:99) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:123) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:4363) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invokeNative(Native Method) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:521) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:860) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:618) 04-20 16:53:39.010: ERROR/Database(419): at dalvik.system.NativeStart.main(Native Method) when i read the database show error like this. please do reply me

  Read the article

• calling calloc - memory leak valgrind

  - by Mike

  The following code is an example from the NCURSES menu library. I'm not sure what could be wrong with the code, but valgrind reports some problems. Any ideas... ==4803== 1,049 (72 direct, 977 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 25 of 36 ==4803== at 0x4C24477: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) ==4803== by 0x400E93: main (in /home/gerardoj/a.out) ==4803== ==4803== LEAK SUMMARY: ==4803== definitely lost: 72 bytes in 1 blocks ==4803== indirectly lost: 977 bytes in 10 blocks ==4803== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==4803== still reachable: 64,942 bytes in 262 blocks Source code: #include <curses.h> #include <menu.h> #define ARRAY_SIZE(a) (sizeof(a) / sizeof(a[0])) #define CTRLD 4 char *choices[] = { "Choice 1", "Choice 2", "Choice 3", "Choice 4", "Choice 5", "Choice 6", "Choice 7", "Exit", } ; int main() { ITEM **my_items; int c; MENU *my_menu; int n_choices, i; ITEM *cur_item; /* Initialize curses */ initscr(); cbreak(); noecho(); keypad(stdscr, TRUE); /* Initialize items */ n_choices = ARRAY_SIZE(choices); my_items = (ITEM **)calloc(n_choices + 1, sizeof(ITEM *)); for (i = 0; i < n_choices; ++i) { my_items[i] = new_item(choices[i], choices[i]); } my_items[n_choices] = (ITEM *)NULL; my_menu = new_menu((ITEM **)my_items); /* Make the menu multi valued */ menu_opts_off(my_menu, O_ONEVALUE); mvprintw(LINES - 3, 0, "Use <SPACE> to select or unselect an item."); mvprintw(LINES - 2, 0, "<ENTER> to see presently selected items(F1 to Exit)"); post_menu(my_menu); refresh(); while ((c = getch()) != KEY_F(1)) { switch (c) { case KEY_DOWN: menu_driver(my_menu, REQ_DOWN_ITEM); break; case KEY_UP: menu_driver(my_menu, REQ_UP_ITEM); break; case ' ': menu_driver(my_menu, REQ_TOGGLE_ITEM); break; case 10: { char temp[200]; ITEM **items; items = menu_items(my_menu); temp[0] = '\0'; for (i = 0; i < item_count(my_menu); ++i) if(item_value(items[i]) == TRUE) { strcat(temp, item_name(items[i])); strcat(temp, " "); } move(20, 0); clrtoeol(); mvprintw(20, 0, temp); refresh(); } break; } } free_item(my_items[0]); free_item(my_items[1]); free_menu(my_menu); endwin(); }

  Read the article

• Possible memory leak problem

  - by MaiTiano

  I write two pieces of c programs like following, during memcheck process using Valgrind, a lot of mem leak information is given. int GetMemory(int framewidth, int frameheight, int SR/*, int blocksize*//*,int ALL_REF_NUM*/) { //int i,j; int memory_size = 0; //int refnum = ALL_REF_NUM; int input_search_range = SR; memory_size += get_mem2D(&curFrameY, frameheight, framewidth); memory_size += get_mem2D(&curFrameU, frameheight>>1, framewidth>>1); memory_size += get_mem2D(&curFrameV, frameheight>>1, framewidth>>1); memory_size += get_mem3D(&prevFrameY, refnum, frameheight, framewidth);// to allocate reference frame buffer accoding to the reference frame number memory_size += get_mem3D(&prevFrameU, refnum, frameheight>>1, framewidth>>1); memory_size += get_mem3D(&prevFrameV, refnum, frameheight>>1, framewidth>>1); memory_size += get_mem2D(&mpFrameY, frameheight, framewidth); memory_size += get_mem2D(&mpFrameU, frameheight>>1, framewidth>>1); memory_size += get_mem2D(&mpFrameV, frameheight>>1, framewidth>>1); memory_size += get_mem2D(&searchwindow, input_search_range*2 + blocksize, input_search_range*2 + blocksize);// to allocate search window according to the searchrange /*memory_size +=*/ get_mem1D(/*&SAD_cost, height, width*/); // memory_size += get_mem2D(&searchwindow, 80, 80);// if searchrange is 32, then only 32+1+32+15 pixels is needed in each row and col, therefore the range of // search window is enough to be set to 80 ! memory_size += get_mem2Dint(&all_mv, height/blocksize, width/blocksize); return 0; } void FreeMemory(int refno) { free_mem2D(curFrameY); free_mem2D(curFrameU); free_mem2D(curFrameV); free_mem3D(prevFrameY,refno); free_mem3D(prevFrameU,refno); free_mem3D(prevFrameV,refno); free_mem2D(mpFrameY); free_mem2D(mpFrameU); free_mem2D(mpFrameV); free_mem2D(searchwindow); free_mem1D(); free_mem2Dint(all_mv); } void free_mem1D() { free(SAD_cost); } Now I hope to make sure where are the possible problems in my program? Here I may post some valgrind information to let you know about the actual error information. ==29105== by 0x804A906: main (me_search.c:1480) ==29105== ==29105== ==29105== HEAP SUMMARY: ==29105== in use at exit: 124,088 bytes in 18 blocks ==29105== total heap usage: 37 allocs, 21 frees, 749,276 bytes allocated ==29105== ==29105== 272 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x804885E: GetMemory (me_search.c:117) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 352 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 2 of 18 ==29105== at 0x4024F20: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236) ==29105== by 0x409537E: __fopen_internal (iofopen.c:76) ==29105== by 0x409544B: fopen@@GLIBC_2.1 (iofopen.c:107) ==29105== by 0x804A660: main (me_search.c:1439) ==29105== ==29105== 584 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 3 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x8048724: GetMemory (me_search.c:106) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 584 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 4 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x8048747: GetMemory (me_search.c:107) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 584 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 5 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x8048809: GetMemory (me_search.c:114) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 584 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 6 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x804882C: GetMemory (me_search.c:115) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 584 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 7 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x804A4F8: get_mem3D (me_search.c:1393) ==29105== by 0x804879B: GetMemory (me_search.c:110) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 584 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 8 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x804A4F8: get_mem3D (me_search.c:1393) ==29105== by 0x80487C9: GetMemory (me_search.c:111) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 1,168 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 9 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x8048701: GetMemory (me_search.c:105) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 1,168 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 10 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x80487E6: GetMemory (me_search.c:113) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 1,168 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 11 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x804A4F8: get_mem3D (me_search.c:1393) ==29105== by 0x804876D: GetMemory (me_search.c:109) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 6,336 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 12 of 18 ==29105== at 0x4024F20: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236) ==29105== by 0x804A25C: get_mem1D (me_search.c:1295) ==29105== by 0x8048866: GetMemory (me_search.c:119) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456)

  Read the article

• Memory leak in C++ program.

  - by lampshade

  What I have is a very crude linked list..THe problem for me is that I am getting a memory leak in the constructor or main. I think it is the constructor. I have not yet deleted the eventName varaible that I have allocated memory for. Could someone help please? :/ (This is not a homework question) class Event { private: char * eventName ; string userEvent; struct node { node(); node * nextByName; const char * eventName; }; node * headByName; public: Event(const char * eventName, const Date &myDate); Event(); virtual ~Event(); void insert(const char * eventName, const Date &myDate, const Time &myTime); void setEvent(); const char * const getEvent() const { return userEvent.c_str(); }; void displayByName(ostream& out) const; }; Event::Event(const char * eventName, const Date &myDate) : eventName(new char[strlen(eventName)+1]), headByName(NULL), userEvent("") { if (eventName) { size_t length = strlen(eventName) +1; strcpy_s(this->eventName, length, eventName); } else eventName = NULL; } Event::Event() : eventName(NULL), userEvent(NULL), headByName(NULL) { } Event::~Event() { node * temp_node = NULL; node * current_node = headByName; while ( current_node ) { temp_node = current_node->nextByName; delete current_node; current_node = temp_node; } } void Event::insert(const char * eventName, const Date &myDate, const Time &myTime) // when we insert we dont care about the time, just the name and the date { node * current_node = new node(); if ( headByName == NULL ) { headByName = current_node; headByName->eventName = eventName; } else { node * search_node = headByName; node * prev_node = NULL; while ( search_node != NULL ) { prev_node = search_node; search_node = search_node->nextByName; } if ( NULL == prev_node ) { headByName = current_node; } else { prev_node->nextByName = current_node; } current_node->nextByName = search_node; current_node->eventName = eventName ; } } void Event::displayByName(ostream& out) const { cout << "Scheduled Events are: " << endl << endl; node * current_node = headByName; while ( current_node ) { (char*)eventName = (char*)current_node->eventName; out << eventName << endl; current_node = current_node->nextByName; } } Event::node::node() : nextByName(NULL), eventName(NULL) { } void Event::setEvent() { cout << "\n\nEnter a new event! "; cin.getline((char*)userEvent.c_str(), 256); size_t length = strlen(userEvent.c_str()) +1; strcpy_s((char*)this->userEvent.c_str(), length, userEvent.c_str()); } /********************************************************************************* **********************************************************************************/ int main() { Date * dPtr = new Date("March", 21, 2010); // instaintiate our Date class object by allocating default date paramateres. Event * ePtr = new Event("First Day of Spring", *dPtr); Time * tPtr = new Time(10,12,"PM"); cout << "default Time is: " << tPtr << endl; cout << "default Date is: " << dPtr << endl; ePtr->insert("First Day of Spring",*dPtr, *tPtr); ePtr->insert("Valentines Day", Date("February",14,2010), *tPtr); ePtr->insert("New Years Day", Date("Janurary",1,2011), *tPtr); ePtr->insert("St. Patricks Day", Date("March",17,2010), *tPtr); ePtr->displayByName(cout); ePtr->setEvent(); const char * const theEvent = ePtr->getEvent(); dPtr->setDate(); ePtr->insert(theEvent, *dPtr, *tPtr); tPtr->setTime(); cout << "Your event: " << theEvent << " is scheduled for: " << endl << dPtr << "at" << tPtr; ePtr->displayByName(cout); delete tPtr; delete dPtr; delete ePtr; cin.ignore(); return 0; }

  Read the article

• Memory leak / GLib issue.

  - by Andrei Ciobanu

  1: /* 2: * File: xyn-playlist.c 3: * Author: Andrei Ciobanu 4: * 5: * Created on June 4, 2010, 12:47 PM 6: */ 7:   8: #include <dirent.h> 9: #include <glib.h> 10: #include <stdio.h> 11: #include <stdlib.h> 12: #include <sys/stat.h> 13: #include <unistd.h> 14:   15: /** 16: * Returns a list all the file(paths) from a directory. 17: * Returns 'NULL' if a certain error occurs. 18: * @param dir_path. 19: * @param A list of gchars* indicating what file patterns to detect. 20: */ 21: GSList *xyn_pl_get_files(const gchar *dir_path, GSList *file_patterns) { 22: /* Returning list containing file paths */ 23: GSList *fpaths = NULL; 24: /* Used to scan directories for subdirs. Acts like a 25: * stack, to avoid recursion. */ 26: GSList *dirs = NULL; 27: /* Current dir */ 28: DIR *cdir = NULL; 29: /* Current dir entries */ 30: struct dirent *cent = NULL; 31: /* File stats */ 32: struct stat cent_stat; 33: /* dir_path duplicate, on the heap */ 34: gchar *dir_pdup; 35:   36: if (dir_path == NULL) { 37: return NULL; 38: } 39:   40: dir_pdup = g_strdup((const gchar*) dir_path); 41: dirs = g_slist_append(dirs, (gpointer) dir_pdup); 42: while (dirs != NULL) { 43: cdir = opendir((const gchar*) dirs->data); 44: if (cdir == NULL) { 45: g_slist_free(dirs); 46: g_slist_free(fpaths); 47: return NULL; 48: } 49: chdir((const gchar*) dirs->data); 50: while ((cent = readdir(cdir)) != NULL) { 51: lstat(cent->d_name, &cent_stat); 52: if (S_ISDIR(cent_stat.st_mode)) { 53: if (g_strcmp0(cent->d_name, ".") == 0 || 54: g_strcmp0(cent->d_name, "..") == 0) { 55: /* Skip "." and ".." dirs */ 56: continue; 57: } 58: dirs = g_slist_append(dirs, 59: g_strconcat((gchar*) dirs->data, "/", cent->d_name, NULL)); 60: } else { 61: fpaths = g_slist_append(fpaths, 62: g_strconcat((gchar*) dirs->data, "/", cent->d_name, NULL)); 63: } 64: } 65: g_free(dirs->data); 66: dirs = g_slist_delete_link(dirs, dirs); 67: closedir(cdir); 68: } 69: return fpaths; 70: } 71:   72: int main(int argc, char** argv) { 73: GSList *l = NULL; 74: l = xyn_pl_get_files("/home/andrei/Music", NULL); 75: g_slist_foreach(l,(GFunc)printf,NULL); 76: printf("%d\n",g_slist_length(l)); 77: g_slist_free(l); 78: return (0); 79: } 80:   81:   82: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------==15429== 83: ==15429== HEAP SUMMARY: 84: ==15429== in use at exit: 751,451 bytes in 7,263 blocks 85: ==15429== total heap usage: 8,611 allocs, 1,348 frees, 22,898,217 bytes allocated 86: ==15429== 87: ==15429== 120 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1 of 11 88: ==15429== at 0x4024106: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:581) 89: ==15429== by 0x4024163: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:709) 90: ==15429== by 0x40969C1: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 91: ==15429== by 0x40971F6: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 92: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 93: ==15429== by 0x80488F0: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:41) 94: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 95: ==15429== 96: ==15429== 129 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 2 of 11 97: ==15429== at 0x4024F20: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236) 98: ==15429== by 0x4081243: g_malloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 99: ==15429== by 0x409B85B: g_strconcat (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 100: ==15429== by 0x80489FE: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:62) 101: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 102: ==15429== 103: ==15429== 360 bytes in 3 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 3 of 11 104: ==15429== at 0x4024106: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:581) 105: ==15429== by 0x4024163: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:709) 106: ==15429== by 0x40969C1: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 107: ==15429== by 0x4097222: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 108: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 109: ==15429== by 0x80488F0: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:41) 110: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 111: ==15429== 112: ==15429== 508 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 4 of 11 113: ==15429== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) 114: ==15429== by 0x408113B: g_malloc0 (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 115: ==15429== by 0x409624D: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 116: ==15429== by 0x409710C: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 117: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 118: ==15429== by 0x80488F0: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:41) 119: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 120: ==15429== 121: ==15429== 508 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 5 of 11 122: ==15429== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) 123: ==15429== by 0x408113B: g_malloc0 (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 124: ==15429== by 0x409626F: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 125: ==15429== by 0x409710C: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 126: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 127: ==15429== by 0x80488F0: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:41) 128: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 129: ==15429== 130: ==15429== 508 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 6 of 11 131: ==15429== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) 132: ==15429== by 0x408113B: g_malloc0 (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 133: ==15429== by 0x4096291: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 134: ==15429== by 0x409710C: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 135: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 136: ==15429== by 0x80488F0: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:41) 137: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 138: ==15429== 139: ==15429== 1,200 bytes in 10 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 7 of 11 140: ==15429== at 0x4024106: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:581) 141: ==15429== by 0x4024163: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:709) 142: ==15429== by 0x40969C1: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 143: ==15429== by 0x40971F6: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 144: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 145: ==15429== by 0x8048A0D: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:61) 146: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 147: ==15429== 148: ==15429== 2,040 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 8 of 11 149: ==15429== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) 150: ==15429== by 0x408113B: g_malloc0 (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 151: ==15429== by 0x40970AB: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 152: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 153: ==15429== by 0x80488F0: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:41) 154: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 155: ==15429== 156: ==15429== 4,320 bytes in 36 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 9 of 11 157: ==15429== at 0x4024106: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:581) 158: ==15429== by 0x4024163: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:709) 159: ==15429== by 0x40969C1: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 160: ==15429== by 0x4097222: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 161: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 162: ==15429== by 0x80489D2: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:58) 163: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 164: ==15429== 165: ==15429== 56,640 bytes in 472 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 10 of 11 166: ==15429== at 0x4024106: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:581) 167: ==15429== by 0x4024163: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:709) 168: ==15429== by 0x40969C1: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 169: ==15429== by 0x4097222: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 170: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 171: ==15429== by 0x8048A0D: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:61) 172: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 173: ==15429== 174: ==15429== 685,118 bytes in 6,736 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 11 of 11 175: ==15429== at 0x4024F20: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236) 176: ==15429== by 0x4081243: g_malloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 177: ==15429== by 0x409B85B: g_strconcat (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 178: ==15429== by 0x80489FE: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:62) 179: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 180: ==15429== 181: ==15429== LEAK SUMMARY: 182: ==15429== definitely lost: 685,118 bytes in 6,736 blocks 183: ==15429== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks 184: ==15429== possibly lost: 62,769 bytes in 523 blocks 185: ==15429== still reachable: 3,564 bytes in 4 blocks 186: ==15429== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks 187: ==15429== 188: ==15429== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v 189: ==15429== ERROR SUMMARY: 7 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 17 from 8) 190: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am using the above code in order to create a list with all the filepaths in a certain directory. (In my case fts.h or ftw.h are not an option). I am using GLib as the data structures library. Still I have my doubts in regarding the way GLib is allocating, de-allocating memory ? When invoking g_slist_free(list) i also free the data contained by the elements ? Why all those memory leaks appear ? Is valgrind a suitable tool for profilinf memory issues when using a complex library like GLib ? LATER EDIT: If I g_slist_foreach(l,(GFunc)g_free,NULL);, the valgrind report is different, (All the memory leaks from 'definitely lost' will move to 'indirectly lost'). Still I don't see the point ? Aren't GLib collections implement a way to be freed ?

  Read the article

• iPhone: Leak with UIWebView loading Office documents. Any ideas how to avoid it?

  - by Thomas Tempelmann

  While there are already quite a few posts about leaks around UIWebView, mine is a bit more special, I believe, and thus deserves its own post here. I see a reproducible large leak every time I load a Office document such as a Word or Excel file. For instance, every time I display a 180KB .doc file, I get a 100KB leak. And that happens with both the simulator and an actual device, running OS 3.1.3. The leak is not visible with the Leaks instrument but only by looking at the malloc instances via the ObjectAlloc instrument. Here's a picture from the instruments trace: I've also made a demo project, UIWebView-Leak.zip, so you can verify this yourself. To see the leak, use the ObjectAlloc instrument, switch to the view where you see individual allocation objects, and sort by size so that you see the large ones in a group, just like in my picture above. Then view a Office document a few times and find the Malloc objects that keep staying "Live" even after the actual UIWebView has been freed. Is this a known bug? Or is there any way I can avoid these leaks? I.e, have you successfully shown Office documents on an iPhone withing getting such leaks? Note: I've reported this as a bug to Apple now, too (ID 7950594) I am still waiting for someone (including Apple) to confirm this as a true leak or show why it isn't (i.e. that I do something wrong or make wrong assumptions)

  Read the article

• .NET JIT Code Cache leaking?

  - by pitchfork

  We have a server component written in .Net 3.5. It runs as service on a Windows Server 2008 Standard Edition. It works great but after some time (days) we notice massive slowdowns and an increased working set. We expected some kind of memory leak and used WinDBG/SOS to analyze dumps of the process. Unfortunately the GC Heap doesn’t show any leak but we noticed that the JIT code heap has grown from 8MB after the start to more than 1GB after a few days. We don’t use any dynamic code generation techniques by our own. We use Linq2SQL which is known for dynamic code generation but we don’t know if it can cause such a problem. The main question is if there is any technique to analyze the dump and check where all this Host Code Heap blocks that are shown in the WinDBG dumps come from? [Update] In the mean time we did some more analysis and had Linq2SQL as probable suspect, especially since we do not use precompiled queries. The following example program creates exactly the same behaviour where more and more Host Code Heap blocks are created over time. using System; using System.Linq; using System.Threading; namespace LinqStressTest { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++ i) ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(Worker); while(runs < 1000000) { Thread.Sleep(5000); } } static void Worker(object state) { for (int i = 0; i < 50; ++i) { using (var ctx = new DataClasses1DataContext()) { long id = rnd.Next(); var x = ctx.AccountNucleusInfos.Where(an => an.Account.SimPlayers.First().Id == id).SingleOrDefault(); } } var localruns = Interlocked.Add(ref runs, 1); System.Console.WriteLine("Action: " + localruns); ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(Worker); } static Random rnd = new Random(); static long runs = 0; } } When we replace the Linq query with a precompiled one, the problem seems to disappear.

  Read the article

• What should the retainCount be when returning an object in Objective-C?

  - by Yakattak

  See title. To be more specific, I am trying to return the mutableCopy of an object, however it's returned with a retainCount of 1 and I am worrying that it will leak.

  Read the article

• Too much memory consumed during TFS automated build

  - by Bernard Chen

  We're running TFS 2010 Standard Edition, and we've set up an automated build to run whenever someone checks in code. We run through all of the automated tests (built with MSTest) as part of the build. We've configured the build to run the tests as a 64-bit process, but the QTAgent.exe that runs the tests grows in memory while the tests are running. It is currently reaching 8GB for the ~650 tests we have, and the process has slowed significantly when we went from 450 tests to 650 tests. When we run all of the tests in the local development environment, memory seems to be freed at least with each TestClass and never exceeds a certain level. The process of running all tests has not increased significantly in the local development environment. Is there a way to configure the build service to free up memory with each Test or each TestClass? With the way things are currently running, the build process gets very slow when we start to run out of memory on the machine. Edit: I found the MSTest invocation in the build log and ran it manually and saw the same behavior of runaway memory. I removed the /publish, /publishbuild, /teamproject, /platform, and /flavor parameters from the invocation of MSTest, in case the test runner was holding onto results until the end, but the behavior didn't change. I ran the same command line on a dev box, separate from the build server, and the memory freed up frequently. It seems there must be something wrong/different about the build server that is causing it to behave different, but I'm stumped where to look. I've looked at qtagent.exe.config, mstest.exe.config, versions of both executables. What else might affect this?

  Read the article

• Linux bizarre memory report

  - by Igor Liner

  I took the following meminfo captures. I don't figure out how the free memory went from 8GB to almost 25GB, when only about 4GB of slab was freed. There was no change of the proccess memory consumption on time the meminfo output was taken. First meminfo with 8GB free memory: MemTotal: 66054256 kB MemFree: 8344960 kB Buffers: 1120 kB Cached: 30172312 kB SwapCached: 0 kB Active: 10795428 kB Inactive: 1914512 kB Active(anon): 10193124 kB Inactive(anon): 1441288 kB Active(file): 602304 kB Inactive(file): 473224 kB Unevictable: 26348912 kB Mlocked: 26348960 kB SwapTotal: 0 kB SwapFree: 0 kB Dirty: 0 kB Writeback: 0 kB AnonPages: 8886304 kB Mapped: 26383052 kB Shmem: 29097904 kB Slab: 6006384 kB SReclaimable: 3512404 kB SUnreclaim: 2493980 kB KernelStack: 15240 kB PageTables: 78724 kB NFS_Unstable: 0 kB Bounce: 0 kB WritebackTmp: 0 kB CommitLimit: 33027128 kB Committed_AS: 44446908 kB VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB VmallocUsed: 426656 kB VmallocChunk: 34325375716 kB HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB AnonHugePages: 7696384 kB HugePages_Total: 0 HugePages_Free: 0 HugePages_Rsvd: 0 HugePages_Surp: 0 Hugepagesize: 2048 kB DirectMap4k: 6144 kB DirectMap2M: 2058240 kB DirectMap1G: 65011712 kB Second memory capture with almost 25GB free memory: MemTotal: 66054256 kB MemFree: 24949116 kB Buffers: 1120 kB Cached: 29085016 kB SwapCached: 0 kB Active: 10168904 kB Inactive: 1461156 kB Active(anon): 10168216 kB Inactive(anon): 1441956 kB Active(file): 688 kB Inactive(file): 19200 kB Unevictable: 26317328 kB Mlocked: 26317376 kB SwapTotal: 0 kB SwapFree: 0 kB Dirty: 0 kB Writeback: 0 kB AnonPages: 8861224 kB Mapped: 26351488 kB Shmem: 29066248 kB Slab: 1503440 kB SReclaimable: 232880 kB SUnreclaim: 1270560 kB KernelStack: 15256 kB PageTables: 79664 kB NFS_Unstable: 0 kB Bounce: 0 kB WritebackTmp: 0 kB CommitLimit: 33027128 kB Committed_AS: 44418280 kB VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB VmallocUsed: 426656 kB VmallocChunk: 34325375716 kB HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB AnonHugePages: 7665664 kB HugePages_Total: 0 HugePages_Free: 0 HugePages_Rsvd: 0 HugePages_Surp: 0 Hugepagesize: 2048 kB DirectMap4k: 6144 kB DirectMap2M: 2058240 kB DirectMap1G: 65011712 kB

  Read the article

• SBS 2003 crashes often due to limited memory

  - by Sanoj

  I have a Windows SBS 2003 Std that regularly crashes, in about every 20th day. The only thing I can see in the logs is that used memory increases with about 30MB/day. The process that uses more and more memory is sqlservr. We don't have much installed on the server; a Point-Of-Sale-system that uses Pervasive SQL as database and an Accounting application. We just have 2GB of RAM and I could upgrade to 4GB but I think that this just delay the problem. Is there any solution to this problem? Could I limit sqlservr to some memory?

  Read the article

• Identifying cause of Software opening hundreds of thousands of handles

  - by user428370

  I have a user running the latest public revision of IBM Notes (8.5.4) on a Windows 7 Pro OA installation. Under his profile and only his, when the software is run, the software opens hundreds of thousands of handles, regarding token queries. This involves only this specific user, on his computer, using only said software. I have narrowed down the issue to being related to his profile but am unsure of what to look at next. Any advice would be appreciated.

  Read the article

• SBS 2003 stops to respond often due to limited memory

  - by Sanoj

  I have a Windows SBS 2003 Std that regularly stops to respond (crashes), in about every 20th day. The only thing I can see in the logs (the one that are mailed to the administrator) is that used memory increases with about 30MB/day. The process that uses more and more memory is sqlservr. We don't have much installed on the server; a Point-Of-Sale-system that uses Pervasive SQL as database and an Accounting application. We just have 2GB of RAM and I could upgrade to 4GB but I think that this just delay the problem. When the server stops to respond, the screen saver cannot be deactivated, no DNS-look-ups is working so the client's can't access Internet. And applications on the server do not reply. And we have to press the power-button to restart the server. For the moment it has an uptime of 19 days and have 2 345MB in memory use (idle) and sqlservr is using 819 MB. So I guess it will crash soon. Is there any solution to this problem? Could I limit sqlservr to some memory?

  Read the article

• linux log memory hogging issue

  - by helpmhost

  Hi, We have a VPS server (it's using Virtuozzo). On a few occasions now, our VPS memory was fully used up and no new connections could be made to the server on SSH, SMTP, or POP. The only thing that works is connecting to the web service. Luckily, plesk is running on the VPS and we have been able to reboot it through plesk (as well as see that the RAM is 100% used). I would like to find what process is causing this. I have a feeling it's MySQL, but don't really know. Is there some sort of logging I could implement that would help me find out what was the cause of this next time it happens? Thanks.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >