Search Results

Search found 24018 results on 961 pages for 'platform specific'.

Page 90/961 | < Previous Page | 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97  | Next Page >

  • Extending Zend_Log for application-specific need

    - by spdaly
    I am building a Zend Framework application that performs jobs submitted by the user. The actions taken need to be logged to a database. I would like to correlate the job with its log entries. Instead of creating my own logging class, I would like to extend Zend_Log since it provides 99% of the functionality that I need. All I need to do is add a foreign key of the job id to the log data model. Is this possible? I'm also looking for a good example of Zend_Log writing to a database. I haven't searched SO yet. I will do that after I post this. Thanks in advance... Steve

    Read the article

  • How can I pass in specific parameters to mstest in Visual Studio

    - by Eric Langland
    I'm trying to modify my test projuect to allow for remote invocation of an api we're building. Right now the tests are hard coded to run locally(against localhost), but I would like to be able to point the tests at any endpoint (even remote ones in production). Ideally there would be a place in the .testsettings for config values to be stored. Sadly this isn't the case. Or, being able to pass parameters to MSTest that the test would read...? Any ideas? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Rails how to return a list of answers with a specific question_id

    - by mytwocentsisworthtwocents
    Let's say I have two Models, Answers and Questions (there are others, but irrelevant to the question). The models are as follows: Answer.rb class Answer < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :description, :question_id has_one :question, :through => :user, :dependent => :destroy validates :description, :presence => true end Question.rb class Question < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :budget, :description, :headline, :user_id, :updated_at, :created_at belongs_to :user has_many :answers validates :headline, :description, :user_id, :presence => true end I'd like to display on a page a list of all answers associated with a question, and only those questions. I got this far. I believe this variable finds all the questions in the database by the question_id (foreign key): @findanswers = Answer.all(params[:question_id]) And this one grabs the the id of the current question (this code will reside as an ERB on the page where the current question is located): @questionshow = Question.find(params[:id]) And now I'm stuck. How do I put the two together so that I list all the answers with the current question id?

    Read the article

  • XDocument.Save to specific directory?

    - by Ignacio
    Hi, I'm using this XML classes for the first time and can't find this piece of info. I'm doing: xmlDoc = new XDocument(new XDeclaration("1.0", "utf-8", "yes")); xmlDoc.Add(new XElement("Images")); xmlDoc .Save("C:\\Backup\\images.xml"); But doesn't work. It only works if I use just the filename, like "images.xml", but of course, the file gets saved on the execution path.

    Read the article

  • how to split this label to get the specific value(free gold)

    - by Wolf
    Hello all i am having a fun filled irritating little problem which i am sure can be resolved in less than 5 seconds with the enlightened and combined minds of stack overflow users ok first off it seems i am having trouble communicating what my trouble is with the gentlemen and ladies who are trying to help me in earlier posts so i am going to make it very simple i need to get 337 and 229 out of this son of satan string that is constantly updating every 2 seconds now i dont know how to go about doing this i know i should probably use split but i dont know how to do it on this because i have very little experience with it Last login: Thu Jun 5 08:20:35 2014 from .** /*/*-..****.**///*-****.**.*/****/*/***status Virtual server [...] is UP. *: 337 bananas left ****(s)******: 229 bananas eaten(s) ** *. [* ] – i am tired and would like to finish this before i am gray or sentanced to prison for raving naked down my street please help and thanks in advance p.s dont really care if this gets down voted a bit tired and more than a little angry so enjoy

    Read the article

  • C# Replace two specific commas in a string with many commas

    - by Hal
    I am trying to change the date format in each line from commas to hyphens. The index of the comma separating the month and day day and year varies. lines_in_List[i] = lines_in_List[i].Insert(0, cnt + ","); // Insert Draw # in 1st column string one_line = lines_in_List[i]; // 0,5,1,2012,1,10,19,16,6,36,,, // 1,11,5,2012,49,35,23,37,38,28,,, // 2,12,10,2012,8,52,53,54,47,15,,, // ^-^--^ replace the ',' with a '-'. StringBuilder changed = new StringBuilder(one_line); changed[3] = '-'; changed[5] = '-'; changed[3] = '-'; lines_in_List[i] = changed.ToString(); }

    Read the article

  • Single C++/CLI method to wrap many type specific C functions

    - by T33C
    I am wrapping a C library using C++/CLI so that the C library can be used easily from C# in a C#'ish way. Some of the functions in this library are for putting a value into a container. There are no generics in C so there exists a function per type CLIB_SetBool(BOOL value), CLIB_SetInt(int value), CLIB_SetString(char* string) and so on. To make it easier to use from C#, I have created a single Set function which takes a System::Object. I have two related questions: With my method how would you use a switch statement on the type of System::Object to call the correct CLIB_Setxxxx function. [typeid is only for unmanaged code and I can't seem to use GetType.] Is there a better way to wrap these functions like using a Generic? [I started using template specialisation but then realised that C# doesn't see templates.] Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Restrict varchar() column to specific values?

    - by adam
    Is there a way to specify, for example 4 distinct values for a varchar column in MS SQL Server 2008? For example, I need a column called Frequency (varchar) that only accepts 'Daily', 'Weekly', 'Monthly', 'Yearly' as possible values Is this possible to set within the SQL Server Management Studio when creating the table?

    Read the article

  • Regular Expression for exclude something that has specific word inside bracked (MySQL)

    - by bn
    This Regular expression if for MySQL query: I want to exclude this row because it has 'something' in side the bracket "bla bla bla bla bla bla (bla bla bla something)" However I want to include this row, because it does not have 'something' inside the bracket "bla bla bla (bla bla bla)" I tried this query but it didnt work. SELECT * FROM table WHERE field NOT REGEXP '((%something%))'; I think this is wrong, I just did trial and error, I like to use regular expression, but never understand it completely. is there any good tutorial/books/links for learning the detail of regular expression? Thank You

    Read the article

  • How to configure a specific service operation to be accessible through a different End Point

    - by pradeeptp
    I have single service contract that has 2 service operations. Let me call these operations as X1 and X2. How do I configure X1 to be accessible through HTTP and X2 to be accessible through TCP/IP. If I configure the service contract to be accessibel to TCP/IP end point then both X1 and X2 will be accessible through TCP/IP. Same is the case if I configure the same service contract with HTTP protocol. I could have two different service contracts for achieving what I want, but I want to know if I could achieve the same through a single service contract.

    Read the article

  • Regular Expression to Match Specific "Values" in Isolated Group

    - by Gandarez
    If have this regular expression to test (\&TRUNC)[\(]{1,}(.+)[\)]{1,} And I have this "tester" ((((&TRUNC((1800,000 / 510)) * 510) * 920) + (2 * (510 * 700)) + ((&TRUNC((1800,000 / 510)) - 1) * 2 * 510 * 80)) / 1000000) * 85,715 My expected value is (inside the personal command "&TRUNC(command)") (1800,000 / 510) I got this value 1800,000 / 510)) * 510) * 920) + (2 * (510 * 700)) + ((&TRUNC((1800,000 / 510)) - 1) * 2 * 510 * 80)) / 1000000 How can I get only expected value in a separated group? PS:. The expressions inside the command called for me as "&TRUNC(command)" is variable.

    Read the article

  • Looking for a specific kind of WEB framework, no malarkey please

    - by Hello you all men
    We do maintenence on a number of systems. I'm finally in a place where I'm teh fucking boss for once, and have to design a large system that will have a long maintenance contract. There's a couple of tasks I find myself always repeating: 1) similar tasks for users with JS and those without 2) similar things for contents and rss/atom feeds, etc. To combat these I will need appropriate handling of assets (think JS files, CSS, themes/templates, etc.), excellent auth/user systems, javascript/ajax forethought, appropriate model setups. Codeigniter fails on many of these. Basically, with enough time I could build this system with Zend, but I'm curious what else is out there as Zend is also kind of a heavy-weight. We need something that is Rapid but maintainable, CodeIgniter is not maintainable. We will have a lot of AJAX APIs in place for the design team to play with. At first I thought jQuery was cool, but now I'm looking at Dojo.

    Read the article

  • antlr: How to rewrite only specific

    - by user1293945
    I am sure antlr can solve my problem, but can't figure out how to implement it, even high level. I rapidly got caught into syntax problems of antlr itself. My grammar is quite simple and made of following tokens and rules. Don't really need to go in their details here. The evaluator resolves to expressions, which finally resolve to IDENT: evaluator : expression EOF! ; ... ... term : PARTICIPANT_TYPE(IDENT | '('! expression ')'! | max | min | if_ | NUMBER)+ ; Now, I would like to analyse and rewrite the 'term', so that IDENT tokens (and them only) get re-written with the PARTICIPANT_TYPE. All the others should simply remain the same.

    Read the article

  • Getting Data Specific to Logged in user

    - by user1770470
    I need to list logged in users active leads,and allow paging and selectable sorting, I cant use the grid because of the layout requirement. I have been searching the web for the last 2 days and cant find any viable solution Any help or direction would be greatly appreciated. var query = db.Query("SELECT a.listingId, a.datetime, c.details, c.buycommercial, c.buyindustrial, c.buyretail, c.buyland, c.tencommercial, c.tenindustrial, c.tenretail, c.tenland, c.investor, c.developer, d.companyname, d.firstname, d.lastname, d.tel, d.cell, d.email FROM dbo.tblactivebroker a JOIN dbo.tblActiveListing b ON a.ListingId = b.ListingId JOIN dbo.tblListings c ON b.ListingId = c.ListingId JOIN dbo.tblContact d ON c.crmid = d.id WHERE b.active = 'True' AND a.ActiveBrokerID = @0",brokerid);

    Read the article

  • How to show specific link to user that's signed in and on specific page in rails?

    - by sevens
    I have the following code for part of my navigation: <% if user_signed_in? %> <li><%= link_to 'Edit Profile', edit_profile_path(current_user.profile) %></li> <li><%= link_to 'Edit Account', edit_user_registration_path %></li> <% elsif user_signed_in? and params[:controller] == 'profiles#edit' %> <li><%= link_to 'View Profile', profile_path(current_user.profile) %></li> <li><%= link_to 'Edit Account', edit_user_registration_path %></li> <% else %> <li><%= link_to 'Sign up', new_user_registration_path %></li> <% end %> I want different links to show depending on where the "user_signed_in" is. However, my <% elsif user_signed_in? and params[:controller] == 'profiles#edit' %> doesn't seem to be working. What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • regex to match specific html tags

    - by Rco8786
    I need to match html tags(the whole tag), based on the tag name. For script tags I have this: <script.+src=.+(\.js|\.axd).+(</script>|>) It correctly matches both tags in the following html: <script src="Scripts/JScript1.js" type="text/javascript" /> <script type="text/javascript" src="Scripts/JScript2.js" /> However, when I do link tags with the following: <link.+href=.+(\.css).+(</link>|>) It matches all of this at once(eg it returns one match containing both items): <link href="Stylesheets/StyleSheet1.css" rel="Stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <link href="Stylesheets/StyleSheet2.css" rel="Stylesheet" type="text/css" /> What am I missing here? The regexes are essentially identical except for the text to match to? Also, I know that regex is not a great tool for HTML parsing...I will probably end up using the HtmlAgilityPack in the end, but this is driving me nuts and I want an answer if only for my own mental health!

    Read the article

  • CakePHP - recursive on specific fields in model?

    - by Paul
    Hi, I'm pretty new to CakePHP but I think I'm starting to get the hang of it. I'm trying to pull related table information recursively, but I want to specify which related models to recurse on. Let me give you an example to demonstrate my goal: I have a model "Customer", which has info like Company name, website, etc. "Customer" hasMany "Addresses", which contain info for individual contacts like Contact Name, Street, City, State, Country, etc. "Customer" also belongsTo "CustomerType", which is just has descriptive category info - a name and description, like "Distributor" or "Manufacturer". When I do a find on "Customer" I want to get associated "CustomerType" and "Address" info as sub-arrays, and this works fine just by setting up the hasMany and belongsTo associations properly. But now, here's my issue: I want to get associated State/Country info. So, instead of each "Address" array row just having "state_id", I want it to have "state" = array("id" = 20, "name" = "New York",...) etc. If I set $recursive to a higher value (e.g., 2) in the Partner model, I get what I want for the State/Country info in each "Address". BUT it also recurses on "CustomerType", and that results in the "CustomerType" field of my "Partner" object having a huge array of all Customer objects that match that type, which could be thousands long. So the point is, I DON'T want to recurse on "CustomerType", only on "Address". Is there a way I can set this up? Sorry for the long-winded question, and thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • user specific persistent cck types in drupal

    - by Fion
    Is there a way to do the following. We need to have a few basic cck types that will allow users to track their chosen parameters over a length of time. For example, one cck type may be called "numeric tracker" It would have a field for labeling the type and a field for entering a number. User A might label one numeric tracker "miles driven". Then each day user A would use this type to enter a number. User B might label a numeric tracker "hours slept". Each day user B would enter a number. Is there a way to use cck in this way?

    Read the article

  • XSLT Exclude Specific Tags

    - by MMKD
    I have a problem i am trying to resolve in an XSLT but i an unable to find a solution. The example below is related to a payment system it is adding items to a basket then removing them. The out XML provides a audit trail of actions conducted on a basket. Senario: Add Item (Id 1) Add Item (Id 1) With a price change Void Item (Id 1) Void Item (Id 1) With a price change Add Item (Id 1) Add Item (Id 1) Expected Outcome Remove: Add Item (Id 1) Add Item (Id 1) With a price change Output XML Contains Void Item (Id 1) Void Item (Id 1) With a price change Add Item (Id 1) Add Item (Id 1) Input XML: <xml> <product void="false"> <sequence_number>1</sequence_number> <item_id>11111111</item_id> <price>12</price> </product> <product void="false"> <sequence_number>2</sequence_number> <item_id>11111111</item_id> <price>12</price> <price_change> <price>10</price> </price_change> </product> <product void="true"> <sequence_number>3</sequence_number> <item_id>11111111</item_id> <price>12</price> <price_change> <price>10</price> </price_change> </product> <product void="true"> <sequence_number>4</sequence_number> <item_id>11111111</item_id> <price>12</price> </product> <product void="false"> <sequence_number>5</sequence_number> <item_id>11111111</item_id> <price>12</price> </product> <product void="false"> <sequence_number>6</sequence_number> <item_id>11111111</item_id> <price>12</price> </product> </xml> Expected outcome: <xml> <product void="true"> <sequence_number>3</sequence_number> <item_id>11111111</item_id> <price>12</price> <price_change> <price>10</price> </price_change> </product> <product void="true"> <sequence_number>4</sequence_number> <item_id>11111111</item_id> <price>12</price> </product> <product void="false"> <sequence_number>5</sequence_number> <item_id>11111111</item_id> <price>12</price> </product> <product void="false"> <sequence_number>6</sequence_number> <item_id>11111111</item_id> <price>12</price> </product> </xml> XSLT <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> <xsl:template match="@*|node()"> <xsl:copy> <xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/> </xsl:copy> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="//product[@void='false']"> <xsl:if test="item_id != //product[@void='true']/item_id"> <xsl:copy> <xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/> </xsl:copy> </xsl:if> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> The problem with this is that it is deleting all products that are not voided and have the same id and not taking into account the number of void items vs the number of none void items. If you have 1 void item it should only delete one product that is not voided but has exactly the same tags as itself

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97  | Next Page >