Search Results

Search found 32961 results on 1319 pages for 'java'.

Page 927/1319 | < Previous Page | 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934  | Next Page >

  • How to change the way that timer schedules in TimerTask?

    - by Judking
    Here is the code snippet: Timer t = new Timer(); TimerTask task = new TimerTask() { @Override public void run() { //change the timer rate of scheduleAtFixedRate here } }; //every 10 sec t.scheduleAtFixedRate(task, new Date(), 10000); Could anyone tell me how to change the rate of timer to t.scheduleAtFixedRate(task, new Date(), 30000) in method run from TimerTask instance? Thanks a lot!

    Read the article

  • Trouble deciding return type of a method that returns a SortedSet

    - by devoured elysium
    I am supposed to make a class that should be a container for an interval of values (like in mathematics). I have already decided that I'll use internally a SortedSet. One of the the things I'm supposed to implement is a method that "gets an ordered set with all the elements in the interval". class Interval { private SortedSet sortedSet = new something(); ... <<method that should return an ordered set of values>> } My question resides in what should be both the method's return type and name. Several hypothesis arise: SortedSet getSortedElements(); I am internally using a SortedSet, so I should return that type. I should state that intent in the method's name. SortedSet getElements(); I am internally using a SortedSet, but there's no point in stating that in the method name(I don't see a big point in this one). Set getElements(); I should try to always return the most basic type, thus I am returning a Set. By the contract and definition of the method, people already know all the elements are in order. Set getSortedElements(); For the method return type, the same as above. About the method name, you are stating clearly what this method is going to return: a set of elements that are sorted. I'm inclined to use 4. , but the others also seem alright. Is there a clear winner? Why?

    Read the article

  • How to create live stream audio for web-sites ???

    - by Kathir
    Hi All, We are storing sound from mic to pc via sound forge. We would like to broadcast the sound which comes from the mic to the pc as live streaming audio. Basically a person speaks in a mic, we like to give it as live stream audio. The web-site is hosted on yahoo server. Can you please let me know in what are the ways we can achieve this? Thanks, Kathir

    Read the article

  • OutOfMemoryError creating a tree recursively?

    - by Alexander Khaos Greenstein
    root = new TreeNode(N); constructTree(N, root); private void constructTree(int N, TreeNode node) { if (N > 0) { node.setLeft(new TreeNode(N-1)); constructTree(N-1, node.getLeft()); } if (N > 1) { node.setMiddle(new TreeNode(N-2)); constructTree(N-2, node.getMiddle()); } if (N > 2) { node.setRight(new TreeNode(N-3)); constructTree(N-3, node.getRight()); } Assume N is the root number, and the three will create a left middle right node of N-1, N-2, N-3. EX: 5 / | \ 4 3 2 /|\ 3 2 1 etc. My GameNode class has the following variables: private int number; private GameNode left, middle, right; Whenever I construct a tree with an integer greater than 28, I get a OutOfMemoryError. Is my recursive method just incredibly inefficient or is this natural? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Polymorphic behavior not being implemented

    - by Garrett A. Hughes
    The last two lines of this code illustrate the problem: the compiler works when I use the reference to the object, but not when I assign the reference to an array element. The rest of the code is in the same package in separate files. BioStudent and ChemStudent are separate classes, as well as Student. package pkgPoly; public class Poly { public static void main(String[] arg) { Student[] stud = new Student[3]; // create a biology student BioStudent s1 = new BioStudent("Tom"); // create a chemistry student ChemStudent s2 = new ChemStudent("Dick"); // fill the student body with studs stud[0] = s0; stud[1] = s1; // compiler complains that it can't find symbol getMajor on next line System.out.println("major: " + stud[0].getMajor() ); // doesn't compile; System.out.println("major: " + s0.getMajor() ); // works: compiles and runs correctly } }

    Read the article

  • How do I ensure my abstract class's function can only operate on extenders of the same type as the c

    - by incrediman
    For example, let's say this is my abstract class: abstract class A{ int x; int y; void foo(A fooMe); } ...and B and C are two classes which extend A. What I want is for B to only be able to call foo() on other Bs, and for C to only be able to call foo() on other Cs. But I want this to be out of the hands of the programmer who's extending my A class - that is, I want a way to ensure this functionality within As code alone. What can I do? (If possible) I'd like to avoid any hack or generics solution that's too messy - I still want foo to be able to be called like this, for example: B b=new B(); B bb=new B(); bb.foo(b);

    Read the article

  • showDialog in Activity not displaying dialog

    - by Mohit Deshpande
    Here is my code: public class TasksList extends ListActivity { ... private static final int COLUMNS_DIALOG = 7; private static final int ORDER_DIALOG = 8; ... /** * @see android.app.Activity#onCreateDialog(int) */ @Override protected Dialog onCreateDialog(int id) { Dialog dialog; final String[] columns; Cursor c = managedQuery(Tasks.CONTENT_URI, null, null, null, null); columns = c.getColumnNames(); final String[] order = { "Ascending", "Descending" }; switch (id) { case COLUMNS_DIALOG: AlertDialog.Builder columnDialog = new AlertDialog.Builder(this); columnDialog.setSingleChoiceItems(columns, -1, new DialogInterface.OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(DialogInterface dialog, int which) { bundle.putString("column", columns[which]); } }); dialog = columnDialog.create(); case ORDER_DIALOG: AlertDialog.Builder orderDialog = new AlertDialog.Builder(this); orderDialog.setSingleChoiceItems(order, -1, new DialogInterface.OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(DialogInterface dialog, int which) { String orderS; if (order[which].equalsIgnoreCase("Ascending")) orderS = "ASC"; else orderS = "DESC"; bundle.putString("order", orderS); } }); dialog = orderDialog.create(); default: dialog = null; } return dialog; } /** * @see android.app.Activity#onOptionsItemSelected(android.view.MenuItem) */ @Override public boolean onOptionsItemSelected(MenuItem item) { switch (item.getItemId()) { case SORT_MENU: showDialog(COLUMNS_DIALOG); showDialog(ORDER_DIALOG); String orderBy = bundle.getString("column") + bundle.getString("order"); Cursor tasks = managedQuery(Tasks.CONTENT_URI, projection, null, null, orderBy); adapter = new TasksAdapter(this, tasks); getListView().setAdapter(adapter); break; case FILTER_MENU: break; } return false; } The showDialog doesn't display the dialog. I used the Debugger and it does executes these statements, but the dialog doesn't show. }

    Read the article

  • Maven + Tomcat acceleration

    - by Bar
    I am writing a web application with Maven in the Eclipse IDE, and use Tomcat servlet container. So, I run Maven like this: mvn clean compile. It is reasonable that after this oepration I must re-run Tomcat so it can reinitialize the context (Sysdeo Tomcat launcher helps a lot). The problem is Maven execution and subsequebt Tomcat re-running takes noticable amount of time (like 10+ seconds for Maven and 20+ sec. for Tomcat, because of logging, Hibernate mappings, etc.) every time I do it. Is there any automated and more faster solution for these two operatioins? As I see it, a way better solution can be moving re-compiled classes only to the target dir.

    Read the article

  • does anyone see any issues with this thread pattern?

    - by prmatta
    Here is a simple thread pattern that I use when writing a class that needs just one thread, and needs to a specific task. The usual requirements for such a class are that it should be startable, stopable and restartable. Does anyone see any issues with this pattern that I use? public class MyThread implements Runnable { private boolean _exit = false; private Thread _thread = null; public void start () { if (_thread == null) { _thread = new Thread(this, "MyThread"); _thread.start(); } } public void run () { while (_exit) { //do something } } public void stop () { _exit = true; if (_thread != null) { _thread.interrupt(); _thread = null; } } } I am looking for comments around if I am missing something, or if there is a better way to write this.

    Read the article

  • What is wrong in this bit of MyID3 code? (error code is just Exceptions)

    - by user3697621
    Okay, so, this was supposed to get the paths of all mp3 files in a folder, read their metadata and put in an arraylist. public static List<String> OrgMetadata(List<String> rawgenrelist){ File folder = new File("C:\\SOM\\"); File[] listOfFiles = folder.listFiles(); //File path = listOfFiles; for (int i = 0; i < listOfFiles.length; i++) { String pt = listOfFiles[i].getAbsolutePath(); File src = new File(pt); MusicMetadataSet src_set = new MyID3().read(src); if (src_set != null && listOfFiles[i].isFile()) { IMusicMetadata metadata = src_set.getSimplified(); rawgenrelist.add(metadata.getGenreName()); } } List<String> genrelist; genrelist = new ArrayList(new HashSet(rawgenrelist)); return genrelist; }

    Read the article

  • Exception handling pattern

    - by treefrog
    It is a common pattern I see where the error codes associated with an exception are stored as Static final ints. when the exception is created to be thrown, it is constructed with one of these codes along with an error message. This results in the method that is going to catch it having to look at the code and then decide on a course of action. The alternative seems to be- declare a class for EVERY exception error case Is there a middle ground ? what is the recommended method ?

    Read the article

  • ServiceLoader double iterator issues

    - by buge
    Is this a known issue? I had trouble finding any search results. When iterating over a ServiceLoader while an iteration already is in progress, the first iteration will be aborted. For example, assuming there are at least two implementations of Foo, the following code will fail with an AssertionError: ServiceLoader<Foo> loader = ServiceLoader.load(Foo.class); Iterator<Foo> iter1 = loader.iterator(); iter1.next(); Iterator<Foo> iter2 = loader.iterator(); while (iter2.hasNext()) { iter2.next(); } assert iter1.hasNext(); This only seems to occur, if the second iterator really terminates. The code will succeed in this variation for example: ServiceLoader<Foo> loader = ServiceLoader.load(Foo.class); Iterator<Foo> iter1 = loader.iterator(); iter1.next(); Iterator<Foo> iter2 = loader.iterator(); iter2.next(); assert iter1.hasNext(); Is this a bug or a feature? :p Is there a ticket for this already anywhere?

    Read the article

  • Why the generated key size is not constant?

    - by Tom Brito
    The following code prints randomly 634, 635, 636, each time I run it. Why its not constant? public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { KeyPairGenerator keyPairGen = KeyPairGenerator.getInstance("RSA", "BC"); keyPairGen.initialize(1024); RsaKeyPair keyPair = new RsaKeyPair(keyPairGen.generateKeyPair()); System.out.println(keyPair.getPrivate().getEncoded().length); }

    Read the article

  • how to add list to button

    - by priya
    hi... how to add a list to a button.. for example if i have four button like classic, western, jazz,pop.if i click classic button i should get subtitle .or if i click western i should get sub title... so how to creat

    Read the article

  • Hibernate reverse engineering

    - by EugeneP
    I have a structure where the main table is USER, other tables include CATEGORY (contains user_id). What I got after the standard reverse engineering procedure was: the class User contained a collection of categories, the class Category didn't contain the foreign key (user_id) but it did contain the User object. Why did it not contain the foreign key as a class property? And how do I join these two tables in HQL without that glue? HQL - please explain this part.

    Read the article

  • What is "Android Activity", what is the difference between "BlankActivity", and "MasterDetailFlow"?

    - by Adrianus Hendry
    I want to create an android application using Eclipse Juno, but then i am getting confused of what the "activity" actually is. The first time i created android app project, there was an option that require me to select whether i want to create activity, and if so, i need to choose between BlankActivity and MasterDetailFlow. Also, is it possible that an application has many activities? I think i need some tutorials about creating android application using eclipse, so if you have a good tuts either it is in text or videos i will appreciate it. Actually i am a newbie in mobile apps development, so i wish the answer will be less complex. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • proper way to use list to array?

    - by cometta
    public class TestClass{ private String divisions[] ={}; public void doAction(){ Collection testArray = new ArrayList(); // put testArray will data divisions = (String [] ) testArray.toArray(division); //should i use this divisions = (String [] ) testArray.toArray(new String [] {}); //should i use this? } } if i use case 1, and i call doaction multiple time, the division, something will show wrong records if i use case2, divisions will always show the correct records. is my assumption should use case 2?

    Read the article

  • Backing Bean not getting values sent by javascript

    - by Developer106
    I have three drop down lists whose values are been copied to <h:inputHidden> components by the following JavaScript function: function getBirthDate() { var months = document.getElementById("months") var hidden1 = document.getElementById("formsignup:monthField"); hidden1.value = months.options[months.selectedIndex].text; var days = document.getElementById("days"); var hidden2 = document.getElementById("formsignup:dayField"); hidden2.value = days.options[days.selectedIndex].value; var years = document.getElementById("years"); var hidden3 = document.getElementById("formsignup:yearField"); hidden3.value = years.options[years.selectedIndex].value; } Here are the three <h:inputHidden> components: <h:inputHidden value="#{signupBean.month}" id="monthField"/> <h:inputHidden value="#{signupBean.day}" id="dayField"/> <h:inputHidden value="#{signupBean.year}" id="yearField"/> This is the command button that is supposed to invoke the function that copies the values to the inputs and then submits them to the backing bean. <h:commandButton image="images/images/signup1.png" styleClass="joinnow" id="joinus" action="#{signupBean.save}" onclick="getBirthDate()" /> But they arrive as null in the backing bean. How is this caused and how can I solve it?

    Read the article

  • new JDK 7 features

    - by xdevel2000
    I wish to test the new features that will came with the next JDK like project coin, project lambda etc. but the last JDK 7 to download will not have any already implemented! From which build can I test them? I think it's incredible that, now in may 2010 at few months to the official final release (november 2010????) for we developers there is no possibility to test any of this features!!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934  | Next Page >