Search Results

Search found 25405 results on 1017 pages for 'document oriented db'.

Page 95/1017 | < Previous Page | 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102  | Next Page >

  • django: CheckboxMultiSelect problem with db queries

    - by xiackok
    firstly sorry for my bad english there is a simple model Person. That contains just languages: LANGUAGE_LIS = ( (1, 'English'), (2, 'Turkish'), (3, 'Spanish') ) class Person(models.Model): languages = models.CharField(max_length=100, choices=LANGUAGE_LIST) #languages is multi value (CheckBoxSelectMultiple) and here person_save_form: class person_save_form(forms.ModelForm): languages = forms.CharField(widget=forms.CheckBoxSelectMultiple(choices=LANGUAGE_LIST)) class Meta: model = Person it is ok. but how can i search persons for languages like "get persons who knows turkish and english" in the database (MySQL) record "languages" column seen like "[u'1', u'2']". but i want search persons like this: persons = Person.objects.filter(languages__in=request.POST.getlist('languages'))

    Read the article

  • Parametrized Strategy Pattern

    - by ott
    I have several Java classes which implement the strategy pattern. Each class has variable number parameters of different types: interface Strategy { public data execute(data); } class StrategyA implements Strategy { public data execute(data); } class StrategyB implements Strategy { public StrategyB(int paramA, int paramB); public data execute(data); } class StrategyB implements Strategy { public StrategyB(int paramA, String paramB, double paramC); public data execute(data); } Now I want that the user can enter the parameters in some kind of UI. The UI should be chosen at runtime, i.e. the strategies should be independent of it. The parameter dialog should not be monolithic and there should be the possibility to make it behave and look different for each strategy and UI (e.g. console or Swing). How would you solve this problem?

    Read the article

  • Update to php5.3 breaks connecting to mysql db

    - by bobbyb
    I just updated php to 5.3 and can no longer connect to my remote mysql server. I get the following errors: mysqli_connect(): OK packet 6 bytes shorter than expected mysqli_connect(): (HY000/2000): mysqlnd cannot connect to MySQL 4.1+ using old authentication It seems this has to do with the new mysqlnd driver. Is there a way to force it to use the old libmysql driver. Also, reverting to php5.2.11 doesn't seem to fix the issue which seems to work for most people. Anyone have any suggestions? thanks!

    Read the article

  • Good DB Migrations for CakePHP?

    - by Martin Westin
    Hi, I have been trying a few migration scripts for CakePHP but I ran into problems with all of the in some form or another. Please advice me on a migration option for Cake that you use live and know works. I'd like the following "features": -Support CakePHP 1.2(e.g. CakeDCs migrations will only be an option when 1.3 is stable and my app migrated to the new codebase) -Support for (or at least not halt on) Models with a different database config. -Support Models in sub-folders of app/models -Support Models in plugins -Support tables that do not conform to Cake conventions (I have a few special tables that do not have a single primary key field and need to keep them) -Plays well with automated deployment via Capistrano and Git. I do not need rails-style versioned files a git versioned schema file that is compared live to the existing schema will do. That is: I like the SchemaShell in Cake apart from it not being compatible with most of my requirements above. I have looked at and tested: CakePHP Schema Shell http://book.cakephp.org/view/734/Schema-management-and-migrations CakeDC migrations http://cakedc.com/downloads/view/cakephp_migrations_plugin YAML migrations http://github.com/georgious/cakephp-yaml-migrations-and-fixtures joelmoss migrations http://code.google.com/p/cakephp-migrations

    Read the article

  • Accessing "Public" methods from "Private" methods in javascript class

    - by mon4goos
    Is there a way to call "public" javascript functions from "private" ones within a class? Check out the class below: function Class() { this.publicMethod = function() { alert("hello"); } privateMethod = function() { publicMethod(); } this.test = function() { privateMethod(); } } Here is the code I run: var class = new Class(); class.test(); Firebug gives this error: publicMethod is not defined: [Break on this error] publicMethod(); Is there some other way to call publicMethod() within privateMethod() without accessing the global class variable [i.e. class.publicMethod()]?

    Read the article

  • Map a column to be IDENTITY in db with EF4 Code-Only

    - by Tomas Lycken
    Although I have marked my ID column with .Identity(), the generated database schema doesn't have IDENTITY set to true, which gives me problems when I'm adding records. If I manually edit the database schema (in SQL Management Studio) to have the Id column marked IDENTITY, everything works as I want it - I just can't make EF do that by itself. This is my complete mapping: public class EntryConfiguration : EntityConfiguration<Entry> { public EntryConfiguration() { Property(e => e.Id).IsIdentity(); Property(e => e.Amount); Property(e => e.Description).IsRequired(); Property(e => e.TransactionDate); Relationship(e => (ICollection<Tag>)e.Tags).FromProperty(t => t.Entries); } } As I'm using EF to build and re-build the database for integration testing, I really need this to be done automatically...

    Read the article

  • Which Python API should be used with Mongo DB and Django

    - by Thomas
    I have been going back and forth over which Python API to use when interacting with Mongo. I did a quick survey of the landscape and identified three leading candidates. PyMongo MongoEngine Ming If you were designing a new content-heavy website using the django framework, what API would you choose and why? MongoEngine looks like it was built specifically with Django in mind. PyMongo appears to be a thin wrapper around Mongo. It has a lot of power, though loses a lot of the abstractions gained through using django as a framework. Ming represents an interesting middle ground between PyMongo and MongoEngine, though I haven't had the opportunity to take it for a test drive.

    Read the article

  • Fade Out an <ul> and Fade In Info From DB

    - by NessDan
    On my portfolio page I have this setup: <div id="portfolio"> <ul id="sites"> <li> <h3><a href="#">MotorSomethin</a></h3> <img src="http://dummyimage.com/265x100/000/fff" /> <p> We tried going for a very dark but flashy look for this website. Hence the reason we used flash. </p> </li> <li> <h3><a href="#">MotorSomethin</a></h3> <img src="http://dummyimage.com/265x100/000/fff" /> <p> We tried going for a very dark but flashy look for this website. Hence the reason we used flash. </p> </li> <li> <h3><a href="#">MotorSomethin</a></h3> <img src="http://dummyimage.com/265x100/000/fff" /> <p> We tried going for a very dark but flashy look for this website. Hence the reason we used flash. </p> </li> <li> <h3><a href="#">MotorSomethin</a></h3> <img src="http://dummyimage.com/265x100/000/fff" /> <p> We tried going for a very dark but flashy look for this website. Hence the reason we used flash. </p> </li> <li> <h3><a href="#">MotorSomethin</a></h3> <img src="http://dummyimage.com/265x100/000/fff" /> <p> We tried going for a very dark but flashy look for this website. Hence the reason we used flash. </p> </li> </ul> </div> So imagine a grid, 2 sites per line. I want to use jQuery so that when I click the H3, the image, or the paragraph inside the LIE(which are all information about a certain site), it would fade out the entire UL, then grab info about that site from our database. I think this requires AJAX but I don't have much experience with it. I'm also confused on how to use jQuery to write the new HTML after the information is grabbed.

    Read the article

  • PHP Object as XML Document

    - by Sam McAfee
    What is the best way to take a given PHP object and serialize it as XML? I am looking at simple_xml and I have used it to parse XML into objects, but it isn't clear to me how it works the other way around.

    Read the article

  • Concrete Types or Interfaces for return types?

    - by SDReyes
    Today I came to a fundamental paradox of the object programming style, concrete types or interfaces. Whats the better election for a method's return type: a concrete type or an interface? In most cases, I tend to use concrete types as the return type for methods. because I believe that an concrete type is more flexible for further use and exposes more functionality. The dark side of this: Coupling. The angelic one: A concrete type contains per-se the interface you would going to return initially, and extra functionality. What's your thumb's rule? Is there any programming principle for this? BONUS: This is an example of what I mean http://stackoverflow.com/questions/491375/readonlycollection-or-ienumerable-for-exposing-member-collections

    Read the article

  • OOP Design of items in a Point-of-Sale system

    - by Jonas
    I am implementing a Point-of-Sale system. In the system I represent an Item in three places, and I wounder how I should represent them in OOP. First I have the WarehouseItem, that contains price, purchase price, info about the supplier, suppliers price, info about the product and quantity in warehouse. Then I have CartItem, which contains the same fields as WarehouseItem, but adds NrOfItems and Discount. And finally I have ReceiptItem, thats contains an item where I have stripped of info about the supplier, and only contains the price that was payed. Are there any OOP-recommendations, best-practices or design patterns that I could apply for this? I don't really know if CartItem should contain (wrap) an WarehouseItem, or extend it, or if I just should copy the fields that I need. Maybe I should create an Item-class where I keep all common fields, and then extend it to WarehouseItem, CartItem and ReceiptItem. Sometimes I think that it is good to keep the field of the item and just display the information that is needed.

    Read the article

  • Strategy pattern and "action" classes explosion

    - by devoured elysium
    Is it bad policy to have lots of "work" classes(such as Strategy classes), that only do one thing? Let's assume I want to make a Monster class. Instead of just defining everything I want about the monster in one class, I will try to identify what are its main features, so I can define them in interfaces. That will allow to: Seal the class if I want. Later, other users can just create a new class and still have polymorphism by means of the interfaces I've defined. I don't have to worry how people (or myself) might want to change/add features to the base class in the future. All classes inherit from Object and they implement inheritance through interfaces, not from mother classes. Reuse the strategies I'm using with this monster for other members of my game world. Con: This model is rigid. Sometimes we would like to define something that is not easily achieved by just trying to put together this "building blocks". public class AlienMonster : IWalk, IRun, ISwim, IGrowl { IWalkStrategy _walkStrategy; IRunStrategy _runStrategy; ISwimStrategy _swimStrategy; IGrowlStrategy _growlStrategy; public Monster() { _walkStrategy = new FourFootWalkStrategy(); ...etc } public void Walk() { _walkStrategy.Walk(); } ...etc } My idea would be next to make a series of different Strategies that could be used by different monsters. On the other side, some of them could also be used for totally different purposes (i.e., I could have a tank that also "swims"). The only problem I see with this approach is that it could lead to a explosion of pure "method" classes, i.e., Strategy classes that have as only purpose make this or that other action. In the other hand, this kind of "modularity" would allow for high reuse of stratagies, sometimes even in totally different contexts. What is your opinion on this matter? Is this a valid reasoning? Is this over-engineering? Also, assuming we'd make the proper adjustments to the example I gave above, would it be better to define IWalk as: interface IWalk { void Walk(); } or interface IWalk { IWalkStrategy WalkStrategy { get; set; } //or something that ressembles this } being that doing this I wouldn't need to define the methods on Monster itself, I'd just have public getters for IWalkStrategy (this seems to go against the idea that you should encapsulate everything as much as you can!) Why? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Best practices for class-mapping with SoapClient

    - by Foofy
    Using SoapClient's class mapping feature and it's pretty sweet. Unfortunately the SOAP service we're using has a bunch of read-only properties on some of the objects and will throw faults if the properties are passed back as anything but null. Need to filter out the properties before they're used in the SOAP call and am looking for advice on the best way to do it. So far the options are: Stick to a convention where I use getter and setter functions to manipulate the properties, and use property overloading to filter method access since only SoapClient would be doing that. E.g. developers would access properties like this: $obj->getAccountNumber() SoapClient would access properties like this: $obj->accountNumber I don't like this because the properties are still exposed and things could go wrong if developers don't stick to convention. Have a wrapper for SoapClient that sets a public property the mapped objects can check to see if the property is being accessed by SoapClient. I already have a wrapper that assigns a reference to itself to all the mapped objects. class SoapClientWrapper { public function __soapCall($method, $args) { $this->setSoapMode(true); $this->_soapClient->__soapCall($method, $args); $this->setSoapMode(false); } } class Invoice { function __get($val) { if($this->_soapClient->getSoapMode()) { return null; } else { return $this->$val; } } } This works but it doesn't feel right and seems a bit clunky. Do the mapping manually, and don't use SoapClient's mapping features. I'd just have a function on all the mapped objects that returns the safe-to-send properties. Also, nobody would have access to properties they shouldn't since I could enforce getters and setters. A lot more work, though.

    Read the article

  • AntFarm anti-pattern -- strategies to avoid, antidotes to help heal from

    - by alchemical
    I'm working on a 10 page web site with a database back-end. There are 500+ objects in use, trying to implement the MVP pattern in ASP.Net. I'm tracing the code-execution from a single-page, my finger has been on F-11 in Visual Studio for about 40 minutes, there seems to be no end, possibly 1000+ method calls for one web page! If it was just 50 objects that would be one thing, however, code execution snakes through all these objects just like millions of ants frantically woring in their giant dirt mound house, riddled with object tunnels. Hence, a new anti-pattern is born : AntFarm. AntFarm is also known as "OO-Madnes", "OO-Fever", OO-ADD, or simply design-pattern junkie. This is not the first time I've seen this, nor my associates at other companies. It seems that this style is being actively propogated, or in any case is a misunderstanding of the numerous OO/DP gospels going around... I'd like to introduce an anti-pattern to the anti-pattern: GST or "Get Stuff Done" AKA "Get Sh** done" AKA GRD (GetRDone). This pattern focused on just what it says, getting stuff done, in a simple way. I may try to outline it more in a later post, or please share your ideas on this antidote pattern. Anyway, I'm in the midst of a great example of AntFarm anti-pattern as I write (as a bonus, there is no documentation or comments). Please share you thoughts on how this anti-pattern has become so prevelant, how we can avoid it, and how can one undo or deal with this pattern in a live system one must work with!

    Read the article

  • Correct OOP design without getters?

    - by kane77
    I recently read that getters/setters are evil and I have to say it makes sense, yet when I started learning OOP one of the first things I learned was "Encapsulate your fields" so I learned to create class give it some fields, create getters, setters for them and create constructor where I initialize these fields. And every time some other class needs to manipulate this object (or for instance display it) I pass it the object and it manipulate it using getters/setters. I can see problems with this approach. But how to do it right? For instance displaying/rendering object that is "data" class - let's say Person, that has name and date of birth. Should the class have method for displaying the object where some Renderer would be passed as an argument? Wouldn't that violate principle that class should have only one purpose (in this case store state) so it should not care about presentation of this object. Can you suggest some good resources where best practices in OOP design are presented? I'm planning to start a project in my spare time and I want it to be my learning project in correct OOP design..

    Read the article

  • Save blob to DB using hibernate

    - by Link123
    Hey! I tried save file to MySQL using blob with hibernate3. But I always have java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Blob may not be manipulated from creating session org.hibernate.lob.BlobImpl.excep(BlobImpl.java:127) Here some code. package com.uni.domain; public class File extends Identifier { private byte[] data; private String contentType; public byte[] getData() { return data; } public File() {} public void setData(byte[] photo) { this.data = photo; } public boolean isNew() { return true; } public String getContentType() { return contentType; } public void setContentType(String contentType) { this.contentType = contentType; } } package com.uni.domain; import org.hibernate.Hibernate; import org.hibernate.HibernateException; import org.hibernate.usertype.UserType; import java.io.InputStream; import java.io.OutputStream; import java.io.Serializable; import java.sql.*; import java.util.Arrays; public class PhotoType implements UserType { public int[] sqlTypes() { return new int[]{Types.BLOB}; } public Class returnedClass() { return byte[].class; } public boolean equals(Object o, Object o1) throws HibernateException { return Arrays.equals((byte[]) o, (byte[]) o1); } public int hashCode(Object o) throws HibernateException { return o.hashCode(); } public Object nullSafeGet(ResultSet resultSet, String[] strings, Object o) throws HibernateException, SQLException { Blob blob = resultSet.getBlob(strings[0]); return blob.getBytes(1, (int) blob.length()); } public void nullSafeSet(PreparedStatement st, Object value, int index) throws HibernateException, SQLException { st.setBlob(index, Hibernate.createBlob((byte[]) value)); } public Object deepCopy(Object value) { if (value == null) return null; byte[] bytes = (byte[]) value; byte[] result = new byte[bytes.length]; System.arraycopy(bytes, 0, result, 0, bytes.length); return result; } public boolean isMutable() { return true; } public Serializable disassemble(Object o) throws HibernateException { return null; . } public Object assemble(Serializable serializable, Object o) throws HibernateException { return null; . } public Object replace(Object o, Object o1, Object o2) throws HibernateException { return null; . } <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE hibernate-mapping PUBLIC "-//Hibernate/Hibernate Mapping DTD 3.0//EN" "http://hibernate.sourceforge.net/hibernate-mapping-3.0.dtd"> <hibernate-mapping package="com.uni.domain"> <class name="com.uni.domain.File"> <id name="id"> <generator class="native"/> </id> <property name="data" type="com.uni.domain.FleType"/> <property name="contentType"/> </class> </hibernate-mapping> Help me please. Where I’m wrong?

    Read the article

  • Create Class functions on the fly?

    - by JasonS
    Hi, i have a validation class which needs improving. If I require some custom validation I need to specify a custom function. It works a bit like this: The controller tells the validation that a custom validation function is required. The controller runs the validation. --- Gets iffy here --- Validation class creates a new instance of the controller class.... Validation class runs controller-custom_validation_function() Validation class returns true / false Is there someway that I can alter this to do something like this? $validation = new validation; // Insert rules here. $validation-function() = $this-function(); By doing this I could get rid of the step of creating an unneeded class instance.

    Read the article

  • SSRS - Oracle DB, Passing Date parameter

    - by davidl98
    Using SSRS with an Oracle Database. I need to prompt the user when running the report to enter a date for report. What is the best way to add in the parameter in my SSRS Report. Having problem finding the right date format. under the "Report Parameter" menu, I have setup the Report Parameters using the DateTime Datatype. Keep getting this error "ORA-01843: Not a Valid Month" Thank you for your help. Select a.OPR_Name, a.OPR, a.Trans_Desc, a.Trans_Start_Date, Cast(a.S_Date as date) as S_Date, Sum(a.Duration) as T From ( Select US_F.OPR_Name, ITH_F.OPR, ITH_F.ITH_RID, ITH_F.TRANSACT, Transact.DESC_1 as Trans_Desc, To_CHAR(ITH_F.Start_Time,'DD-Mon-YY') as Trans_Start_Date, To_CHAR(ITH_F.Start_Time,'MM/DD/YYYY') as S_Date, Substr(To_CHAR(ITH_F.Start_Time,'HH24:MI'),1,6) as Start_Time, To_CHAR(ITH_F.End_Time,'DD-Mon-YY') as Trans_End_Date, Substr(To_CHAR(ITH_F.End_Time,'HH24:MI'),1,6) as End_Time, Cast(Case When To_CHAR(ITH_F.Start_Time,'DD-Mon-YY') = To_CHAR(ITH_F.End_Time,'DD-Mon-YY') Then (((To_CHAR(ITH_F.End_Time,'SSSSS') - To_CHAR(ITH_F.Start_Time,'SSSSS')) / 60))/60 Else ((86399 - (To_CHAR(ITH_F.Start_Time,'SSSSS')) + To_CHAR(ITH_F.End_Time,'SSSSS'))/60)/60 End as Decimal(3,1)) as Duration from Elite_76_W1.ITH_F Left Join Elite_76_W1.Transact on Transact.Transact = ITH_F.Transact Left Join Elite_76_W1.US_F on US_F.OPR = ITH_F.OPR Where ITH_F.TRANSACT not in ('ASN','QC','LGOT') ) a Where a.S_Date = @Event_Date Having Sum(a.Duration) < 0 Group By a.OPR_Name, a.OPR, a.Trans_Desc, a.Trans_Start_Date, a.S_Date Order by a.OPR_Name

    Read the article

  • VB.NET add an element to the XML document with LINQ to XML

    - by Bayonian
    Hi, I'm adding an element to existing XML doc with the following code: Dim theXMLSource As String = Server.MapPath("~/Demo/") & "LabDemo.xml" Dim nodeElement As XElement Dim attrAndValue As XElement = _ <LabService> <ServiceType> <%= txtServiceType.Text.Trim %> </ServiceType> <Level> <%= txtLevel.Text.Trim %> </Level> </LabService> nodeElement.Add(New XElement(attrAndValue)) nodeElement.Save(theXMLSource) It makes error like this: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. Object reference not set to an instance of an object. Error line: nodeElement.Add(New XElement(attrAndValue)) I debugged it but I couldn't get the error yet. Can you show what the problem is? Thank you

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102  | Next Page >