Search Results

Search found 24149 results on 966 pages for 'visual studio package'.

Page 98/966 | < Previous Page | 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105  | Next Page >

  • Unable to remove fs icons - package

    - by Muhammad
    I tried to remove fs icons from my system and i get the error E: Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11 Resource temporarily unavailable) E: Unable to lock the administration directory (/var/lib/dpkg/), is another process using it? what is the problem???..... Note: After downloading the package i couldn't fin it in my Downloads. I used the following command sudo apt-get remove fs-icons-ubuntu

    Read the article

  • How to run software, that is not offered though package managers, that requires ia32-libs

    - by Onno
    I'm trying to install the Arma 2 OA dedicated server on a Virtualbox VM so I can test my own missions in a sandbox environment in a way that lets me offload them to another computer in my network. (The other computer is running the VM, but it's a windows machine, and I didn't want to hassle with its installation) It needs at least 2, and preferably 4GB of ram, so I thought I would install the AMD64 version of ubuntu 13.10 to get this going. 'How do you run a 32-bit program on a 64-bit version of Ubuntu?' already explained how to install 32bit software though apt-get and/or dpkg, but that doesn't apply in this case. The server is offered as a compressed download on the site of BI Studio, the developer of the Arma games. Its installation instructions are obviously slightly out of date with the current state of the art. (probably because the state of the art has been updated quite recently :) ) It states that I have to install ia32-libs, which has now apparently been deprecated. Now I have to find out how to get the right packages installed to make sure that it will run. My experience level is like novice-intermediate when it comes to these issues. I've installed a lot of packages though apt-get; I've solved dependency issues in the past; I haven't installed much software without using package managers. I can handle myself with basic administrative work like editing conf files and such. I have just gone ahead and tried to install it without installing ia32-libs through apt-get but to install gcc to get the libs after all. My reasoning being that gcc will include the files for backward compatibility coding and on linux all libs are (as far as I can tell) installed at a system level in /libs . So far it seems to start up. (I can connect with the game server trough my in-game network browser, so it's communicating) I'm not sure if there's any dependency checking going on when running the game server program, so I'm left with a couple of questions: Does 13.10 catch any calls to ia32libs libraries and translate the calls to the right code on amd64? If it runs, does that mean that all required libraries have been loaded correctly, or is there a change of it crashing later on when a library that was needed is missing after all? Is it necessary to do a workaround such as installing gcc? How do I find out what libraries I might need to run this software? (or any other piece of 32-bit software that isn't offered through a package manager)

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Data Tools–BI for Visual Studio 2013 Re-released

    - by Greg Low
    Customers used to complain that the tooling for creating BI projects (Analysis Services MD and Tabular, Reporting Services, and Integration services) has been based on earlier versions of Visual Studio than the ones they were using for their other work in Visual Studio (such as C#, VB, and ASP.NET projects). To alleviate that problem, the shipment of those tools has been decoupled from the shipment of the SQL Server product. In SQL Server 2014, the BI tooling isn’t even included in the released version of SQL Server. This allows the team to keep up-to-date with the releases of Visual Studio. A little while back, I was really pleased to see that the Visual Studio 2013 update for SSDT-BI (SQL Server Data Tools for Business Intelligence) had been released. Unfortunately, they then had to be withdrawn. The good news is that they’re back and you can get the latest version from here: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=42313

    Read the article

  • Cannot install wine on Ubuntu natty 64bit [broken dependency]

    - by MHK
    I've just installed Ubuntu natty 64bit. Now I'm trying to install wine and no matter how I do it (Software center/synaptic/terminal), it fails. Here's what I tried on terminal: sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install wine It shows: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: wine : Depends: wine1.3 but it is not going to be installed Depends: ia32-libs (>= 1.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: lib32asound2 (> 1.0.14) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libc6-i386 (>= 2.6-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: lib32nss-mdns (>= 0.10-3) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages Any body faced this? Is this a bug or something is broken on my end? Any hints on how to solve? Edit: I've tried with aptitude, it gives more clear message: sudo aptitude install wine Output: The following NEW packages will be installed: gnome-exe-thumbnailer{a} ia32-libs{a} icoutils{a} imagemagick{a} lib32asound2{ab} lib32bz2-1.0{a} lib32gcc1{ab} lib32ncurses5{a} lib32nss-mdns{a} lib32stdc++6{ab} lib32v4l-0{ab} lib32z1{a} libc6-i386{ab} libcdt4{a} libgraph4{a} libgvc5{a} libilmbase6{a} liblqr-1-0{a} libmagickcore3{a} libmagickcore3-extra{a} libmagickwand3{a} libnetpbm10{a} libopenexr6{a} libpathplan4{a} netpbm{a} ttf-droid{a} ttf-symbol-replacement-wine1.3{a} ttf-umefont{a} winbind{a} wine wine1.3{a} wine1.3-gecko{a} winetricks{a} 0 packages upgraded, 33 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 135 MB of archives. After unpacking 421 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libc6-i386: Depends: libc6 (= 2.12.1-0ubuntu16) but 2.13-0ubuntu13 is installed. lib32gcc1: Depends: gcc-4.5-base (= 4.5.2-2ubuntu3) but 4.5.2-8ubuntu4 is installed. lib32asound2: Depends: libasound2 (= 1.0.23-2.1ubuntu2) but 1.0.24.1-0ubuntu5 is installed. lib32stdc++6: Depends: gcc-4.5-base (= 4.5.2-2ubuntu3) but 4.5.2-8ubuntu4 is installed. lib32v4l-0: Depends: libv4l-0 (= 0.8.1-2) but 0.8.3-1 is installed. The following actions will resolve these dependencies: Keep the following packages at their current version: 1) ia32-libs [Not Installed] 2) lib32asound2 [Not Installed] 3) lib32bz2-1.0 [Not Installed] 4) lib32gcc1 [Not Installed] 5) lib32ncurses5 [Not Installed] 6) lib32nss-mdns [Not Installed] 7) lib32stdc++6 [Not Installed] 8) lib32v4l-0 [Not Installed] 9) lib32z1 [Not Installed] 10) libc6-i386 [Not Installed] 11) wine [Not Installed] 12) wine1.3 [Not Installed] Leave the following dependencies unresolved: 13) wine1.3-gecko recommends wine1.3 14) winetricks recommends wine1.2 | wine1.3 | cxoffice5 | cxgames5 It seems the wine package hasn't been updated in the repo. What should I do now?

    Read the article

  • Microsoft publie la CTP de Visual Studio 2013 Update 3, qui optimise l'environnement de développement

    Microsoft publie la CTP de Visual Studio 2013 Update 3 qui optimise l'environnement de développementVisual Studio 2013 a encore droit à une nouvelle mise à jour. Juste quelques jours après la publication de Visual Studio 2013 Update 2 (VS 2013.2), Microsoft dévoile la préversion de la prochaine mise à jour de l'environnement de développement intégré.Cette mise à jour n'apporte pas de nouveautés majeures, mais optimise cependant l'EDI pour le rendre encore plus agréable lors de son utilisation...

    Read the article

  • How to find out the installation path to my browser?

    - by rumtscho
    I am installing a proprietary CAD application (MEDUSA4 personal) and the installer wants to know the path to my web browser (as a prerequisite for online help). I have the default firefox installation and chromium, but I don't know the installation path for any of them, and couldn't find them among the usual suspects (/usr/bin, /usr/lib). It would be nice if you could tell me the path to one of them, and even nicer if you can tell me how to find out the installation path to any package managed by apt.

    Read the article

  • Error Message when starting Update: Failed to load the package list

    - by George
    Message says: Failed to load the package list This is a serious problem. Try again later. If this problem appears again, please report an error to the developers. Click details, which says: E:Type 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/madman2k/ubuntu' is not known on line 61 in source list /etc/apt/sources.list Tried this solution: sudo rm /var/lib/apt/lists/* -vf sudo apt-get update However, when entering the first command, it hits back an error: rm: cannot remove `/var/lib/apt/lists': Is a directory

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2012 Integration Services - Package and Project Configurations

    Marcin Policht examines SSIS 2012 package and project configurations, which offer different ways of modifying values of variables and parameters without having to directly edit content of the packages and projects of which they are a part. Get smart with SQL Backup ProGet faster, smaller backups with integrated verification.Quickly and easily DBCC CHECKDB your backups. Learn more.

    Read the article

  • Visual Studio 2012 Update 1 now available for download

    - by Greg Low
    Good to see the Visual Studio 2012 team get update 1 out the door. I'm using it now and am pretty happy with it.I like the way that the tools are now being updated out of band. Hopefully, the SQL BI folk will get their templates updated to VS2012 soon too.You can get it here: http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/eng/downloads#d-visual-studio-2012-updateDetailed list of what's changed is here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2012/11/26/visual-studio-and-team-foundation-server-2012-update-1-now-available.aspx 

    Read the article

  • Cannot install "ATI/AMD proprietary FGLRX graphics driver" (SystemError)

    - by Fisherman John
    I have just installed a fresh copy of 12.04.1 64bit. I formatted my PC completely and enabled updates during the installation. After the installation was complete, I went on updating my software. However, when I wanted to install the additional drivers using the Additional Drivers tool (namely "ATI/AMD proprietary FGLRX graphics driver"), it gave me this error: SystemError: E:Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. The same error shows up if I try installing the post-release updates driver. Installing the drivers from the terminal results in this output: XXXXXX:~$ sudo apt-get install fglrx [sudo] password for XXXXX: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: fglrx : Depends: lib32gcc1 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libc6-i386 but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages." I get this using "sudo apt-get update": http://pastebin.com/AWAtDXjY But "sudo apt-get install fglrx" still get me this error: http://pastebin.com/RYM55bVN & "sudo apt-get -f install fglrx" gives me this error: http://pastebin.com/xxekajvP Any help would be greatly appreciated. (Please note that I'm new to Linux, coming directly from Windows. I have tried Ubuntu twice or so before, but it was not for a long period of time. The drivers got installed smoothly the few times I've tried Ubuntu, but post-release updates never worked for me.) [I am going to work now, so I can only answer from my phone. Can't really test any new solutions you may give me until ~10 hours from now on. Maybe more.] @stonedsquirrel When I try to run that command, I get this error: "XXXXXX:~$ sudo apt-get install fglrx [sudo] password for XXXXX: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: fglrx : Depends: lib32gcc1 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libc6-i386 but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages." ie. I get the same error. ( I am Fisherman John, dunno how to login & thereby respond to your comment again _ )

    Read the article

  • Visual Studio Editor Choosing System

    This document gives an overview of how the Visual Studio editor choosing system works, and as an example discusses the XML Editors choosing system.  Visual Studio has the ability to associate multiple editors with a single a file extension.  For instance, .xaml files have multiple editor implementations associated with them. This raises the question of how Visual Studio chooses a specific editor implementation when asked to open a file. his document gives an overview of how the Visual Studio...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • Visual Studio Editor Choosing System

    This document gives an overview of how the Visual Studio editor choosing system works, and as an example discusses the XML Editors choosing system.  Visual Studio has the ability to associate multiple editors with a single a file extension.  For instance, .xaml files have multiple editor implementations associated with them. This raises the question of how Visual Studio chooses a specific editor implementation when asked to open a file. his document gives an overview of how the Visual Studio...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • Silverlight 4 Tools for Visual Studio 2010, l'extension fournit des templates et des librairies pour

    Mise à jour du 18/05/10 Silverlight 4 Tools for Visual Studio 2010 L'extension fournit des templates et des librairies pour Visual Studio et WPF Silverlight 4, la nouvelle mouture de l'alternative de Microsoft au Flash d'Adobe, avait été dévoilé le mois dernier (lire ci-avant). C'est aujourd'hui au tour de l'extension pour Visual Studio de faire son apparition. « Silverlight 4 Tools for Visual Studio 2010 » permet par exemple d'exploiter les fonctionnalités de création d'applications « out of the browser ». Il propose également des templates et de nouvelles librairies pour faciliter l'accès aux données. L'équipe...

    Read the article

  • New features in Windows Azure Tools for Microsoft Visual Studio 1.1(February 2010)

    - by kaleidoscope
    Overview Windows Azure Tools for Microsoft Visual Studio extend Visual Studio 2008 and the upcoming Visual Studio 2010 RC to enable the creation, configuration, building, debugging, running and packaging of scalable web applications and services on Windows Azure. To download Tool: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=5664019e-6860-4c33-9843-4eb40b297ab6&displaylang=en Ram, P

    Read the article

  • configure flags

    - by rantsh
    What is the ubuntu way of downloading the source for a package and then building it while passing specific flags to the configure portion of the process.... I hope I'm explaining what I mean properly. Installing from source follows almost always the following procedure ./configure --FLAG-1 --FLAG-2 make && make install How can I get control over specifying flags1 and 2 in the configure process? Thanks, and I hope I did not make the question more complicated than it really is

    Read the article

  • Java installation for Solaris Studio 12.2

    - by DemiSheep
    I have Solaris Studio almost working. My only issue seems to be Java. Here is what I get: ============================ aflory@aflory-laptop:~$ solstudio & [1] 1723 aflory@aflory-laptop:~$ Solaris Studio is unable to find a supported version of Java. Solaris Studio supports Java version 1.6.0_13 and newer and looks for a valid Java installation in the following order: 1) Location specified with --jdkhome command line option 2) In PATH environment variable 3) At /usr/jdk/latest location, if exists 4) At /usr/java location, if exists 5) At /usr location, if exists ============================ I try typing --jdkhome in the console but I get an command not found error. I have added the following to my /home/aflory/.bashrc file: PATH=$PATH:/usr/java/jdk1.6.0_24/bin:/home/aflory/solstudio12.2/bin export PATH I am running Ubuntu 10.04 64bit. I tried installing the 64 bit version of Java JDK, then I tried installing the 32bit version of Java JDK. I don't believe there is a 64bit version of Solaris Studio.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105  | Next Page >