Search Results

Search found 5 results on 1 pages for 'tvanfosson'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

• What do you do to keep learning?

  - by tvanfosson

  When my children tell me that they hate school, I often tell them that they need to get used to continuous learning because they live in a generation in which constant learning will be required. How do I know -- because I live in a generation and work in an occupation in which continual learning is imperative. Do you agree with this sentiment? If so, what do you do to keep up with the continual pace of change in the field of software development?

  Read the article

• What's the point of indicating AllowMultiple=false on an abstract Attribute class?

  - by tvanfosson

  On a recent question about MVC attributes, someone asked whether using HttpPost and HttpDelete attributes on an action method would result in either request type being allowed or no requests being allowed (since it can't be both a Post and a Delete at the same time). I noticed that ActionMethodSelectorAttribute, from which HttpPostAttribute and HttpDeleteAttribute both derive is decorated with [AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Method, AllowMultiple = false, Inherited = true)] I had expected it to not allow both HttpPost and HttpDelete on the same method because of this, but the compiler doesn't complain. My limited testing tells me that the attribute usage on the base class is simply ignored. AllowMultiple seemingly only disallows two of the same attribute from being applied to a method/class and doesn't seem to consider whether those attributes derive from the same class which is configured to not allow multiples. Moreover, the attribute usage on the base class doesn't even preclude your from changing the attribute usage on a derived class. That being the case, what's the point of even setting the values on the base attribute class? Is it just advisory or am I missing something fundamental in how they work? FYI - it turns out that using both basically precludes that method from ever being considered. The attributes are evaluated independently and one of them will always indicate that the method is not valid for the request since it can't simultaneously be both a Post and a Delete.

  Read the article

• Linq: How to calculate the sales Total price and group them by product

  - by Daoming Yang

  I have a order list and I want to generate and rank the product with its total sales and quantity. With @tvanfosson's help, I can bring the grouped product detail with the following code, but how can I calculate and add up the total sales and quantity into each productListResult's object? Can anyone help me with this? Many thanks. var orderProductVariantListResult = productList.SelectMany(o => o.OrderProductVariantList) .Select(opv => new { Product = opv.ProductVariant.Product, Quantity = opv.Quantity, PriceSales = opv.PriceSales, Sales = opv.Quantity * opv.PriceSales, }); var productListResult = orderProductVariantResult .Select(pv => pv.Product) .GroupBy(p => p) .Select(g => new { Product = g.Key, TotalOrderCount = g.Count() }) .OrderByDescending(x => x.TotalOrderCount).ToList();

  Read the article

• C# rounding DateTime objects

  - by grenade

  I want to round dates/times to the nearest interval for a charting application. I'd like an extension method signature like follows so that the rounding can be acheived for any level of accuracy: static DateTime Round(this DateTime date, TimeSpan span); The idea is that if I pass in a timespan of ten minutes, it will round to the nearest ten minute interval. I can't get my head around the implementation and am hoping one of you will have written or used something similar before. I think either a floor, ceiling or nearest implementation is fine. Any ideas? Edit: Thanks to @tvanfosson & @ShuggyCoUk, the implementation looks like this: public static class DateExtensions { public static DateTime Round(this DateTime date, TimeSpan span) { long ticks = (date.Ticks / span.Ticks) + (span.Ticks / 2) + 1; return new DateTime(ticks * span.Ticks); } public static DateTime Floor(this DateTime date, TimeSpan span) { long ticks = (date.Ticks / span.Ticks); return new DateTime(ticks * span.Ticks); } public static DateTime Ceil(this DateTime date, TimeSpan span) { long ticks = (date.Ticks + span.Ticks - 1) / span.Ticks; return new DateTime(ticks * span.Ticks); } } And is called like so: DateTime nearestHour = DateTime.Now.Round(new TimeSpan(1,0,0)); DateTime minuteCeiling = DateTime.Now.Ceil(new TimeSpan(0,1,0)); DateTime weekFloor = DateTime.Now.Floor(new TimeSpan(7,0,0,0)); ... Cheers!

  Read the article

• jQuery Validation plugin: checkbox groups and error message issues

  - by boomturn

  I've put together a form using the jQuery Validation plugin, and all inputs are fine with working validation and error messages – except for checkboxes. I have two checkbox problems. The first is that the Validation plugin API doesn't seem to handle checkboxes in grouped contexts (I'm using fieldsets for grouping). Found several approaches to the issue here, including reference to a post by Rebecca Murphey for a more general case using a custom method and class. Adapting that to this situation: jQuery.validator.addMethod('required_group', function(val, el) { var fieldParent = $(el).closest('fieldset'); return fieldParent.find('.required_group:checked').length; }); jQuery.validator.addClassRules('required_group', { 'required_group': true }); jQuery.validator.messages.required_group = 'Please check at least one box.'; This sort of works, but produces error messages on every checkbox, and only removes them as each box is clicked. This is not an acceptable situation for the user, who can only get rid of them by clicking false positives. Ideally, I guess what's needed is something to prevent or eliminate extra messages before they are displayed and use errorPlacement to display a single error message in the parent fieldset, that would then be removed with a click on any checkbox. Less ideally, maybe they would all display but an event handler could turn off the full set of redundant messages with a click, which is what this approach offered by tvanfosson appears to do. (Another customized approach here, but I couldn't get it to work.) I guess I should also note this form requires the checkboxes to have different names. My second problem is that one of the fieldsets with checkboxes in the form also contains a nested fieldset of checkboxes under one of the outer checkboxes. So in addition to the first-level one-box-checked requirement, if the particular checkbox containing the second-level checkboxes is checked, then at least one of the second-level boxes must be checked. Not sure about the right approach; I'm guessing what needs to happen (following the above scheme) is that the trigger checkbox would use toggleClass to add/remove 'required_group' class to all the checkboxes in the subfield, which would then (hopefully) behave the same as the parent field: $("#triggerCheckbox").click(function () { $(this).find(":checkbox").toggleClass("required_group"); }); Any suggestions or ideas welcome. I'm well beyond my limited jQuery skills on this one and would be happy to hear that I missed simple, elegant and/or obvious ways to do this!

  Read the article

1