Search Results

Search found 11010 results on 441 pages for 'txt record'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 1/441 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • how to get this working if exist tasklist=="notepad %DATE%.txt" [closed]

    - by blade19899
    @echo off title Log file creator if exist "%CD%\%DATE%.txt" (msg * "the log of today(%DATE%.txt) Has already been made" goto :notepad) else (goto :start) goto :eof :start echo %date%>>"%date%".txt echo %username% >>"%date%".txt echo.>>"%date%".txt echo.>>"%date%".txt echo ----------------------------------------Reports---------------------------------------- >>"%date%".txt echo.>>"%date%".txt echo.>>"%date%".txt echo.>>"%date%".txt echo.>>"%date%".txt echo.>>"%date%".txt echo.>>"%date%".txt echo.>>"%date%".txt echo.>>"%date%".txt echo ----------------------------------------TO-DO---------------------- >>"%date%".txt echo.>>"%date%".txt echo.>>"%date%".txt :notepad if exist tasklist=="notepad %DATE%.txt" (msg * "the log of today(%DATE%.txt) Has already been made, en is opened") else (goto :start) goto :eof :start start notepad %DATE%.txt This code right now pops up the log of today(%DATE%.txt) Has already been made and after clicking OK it doesn't do anything it should open the msg the log of today(%DATE%.txt) Has already been made, en is opened i have notepad opened. with process explorer it shows notepad and the date.txt my question is how to make it show the the log of today(%DATE%.txt) Has already been made, en is opened box... and perhaps bring notepad to the foreground? ps not sure if this question belongs here. Apologize if it doesn't!

    Read the article

  • Robots.txt practices with .htaccess redirections (inherits)

    - by Jayhal
    I have a question regarding how to write robots.txt files for many domains and subdomains with redirects in place. We have a hosting account that enacts primary and add-on domains. All of our domains and subdomains, including the primary domain, is redirected via htaccess 301s to their own subdirectories in the primary domain's root directory. I'm confused about how I would write the robots.txt for certain directories. First, I wanted to confirm I am right in understanding that for domains and subdomains, crawlers will look to the directory that acts as that urls root directory for the crawling rules(robots.txt). Also, that a directory will not be affected by a robots.txt present in their parent directory if the directory has its own domain/subdomain, and that url is the one being accessed by crawlers. (Am pretty sure, but I wanted to confirm I didnt have a fundamentally flawed understanding of robots.txt) In the original root directory on the account(where the primary domain was directed before htaccess was put in place) what should the robots.txt contain? When crawlers look to crawl our primary domain, will they look to the original root directory for the robots.txt or will they reference the file contained in the new subdirectory where all the primary domain's site files are located? If so, what should the root's robot.txt include if anything at all. Would I be right to include a simple 'disallow: /' for all agents, and then include more specific robots.txt files in each subdirectory with more specific instructions. Would that affect the crawling of the directory where the primary domain is now redirected? Any help is greatly appreciated, Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Redirect Google crawler to different robots.txt via .htaccess

    - by user3474818
    I have googled for the answer all day and still couldn't find an answer. I have a virtual subdomain www.static.example.com which is a mirror site of www.example.com. It means I have just one root folder for subdomain and domain aswell. I want to redirect crawlers to different robots.txt file - robots_static.txt when they see .static in url in which I will forbid indexing via /disallow command. I want to do this because I have duplicated content in Google search results. Subdomain is showing the exact same content as the main domain. Does anyone know how could I achieve that crawlers sees robots_static.txt instead of robots.txt? What I have managed to find so far is this: RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.static.*$ [NC] RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^[A-Z]{3,9}\ /.*robots\.txt.*\ HTTP/ [NC] RewriteRule ^robots\.txt /robots_static.txt [NC,L] but when I check in webmaster tools, it still sees robots.txt as my robots file instead of robots_static.txt, so it crawls and index everything twice. What did I do wrong? Thanks EDIT: This is my .htaccess file ## # @package Joomla # @copyright Copyright (C) 2005 - 2013 Open Source Matters. All rights reserved. # @license GNU General Public License version 2 or later; see LICENSE.txt ## ## # READ THIS COMPLETELY IF YOU CHOOSE TO USE THIS FILE! # # The line just below this section: 'Options +FollowSymLinks' may cause problems # with some server configurations. It is required for use of mod_rewrite, but may already # be set by your server administrator in a way that dissallows changing it in # your .htaccess file. If using it causes your server to error out, comment it out (add # to # beginning of line), reload your site in your browser and test your sef url's. If they work, # it has been set by your server administrator and you do not need it set here. ## ## Can be commented out if causes errors, see notes above. Options +FollowSymLinks ## Mod_rewrite in use. RewriteEngine On RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\. RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [R=301,L] RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.static.*$ [NC] RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^[A-Z]{3,9}\ /.*robots\.txt.*\ HTTP/ [NC] RewriteRule ^robots\.txt /robots_static.txt [NC,L] ## Begin - Rewrite rules to block out some common exploits. # If you experience problems on your site block out the operations listed below # This attempts to block the most common type of exploit `attempts` to Joomla! # # Block out any script trying to base64_encode data within the URL. RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} base64_encode[^(]*\([^)]*\) [OR] # Block out any script that includes a <script> tag in URL. RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} (<|%3C)([^s]*s)+cript.*(>|%3E) [NC,OR] # Block out any script trying to set a PHP GLOBALS variable via URL. RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} GLOBALS(=|\[|\%[0-9A-Z]{0,2}) [OR] # Block out any script trying to modify a _REQUEST variable via URL. RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} _REQUEST(=|\[|\%[0-9A-Z]{0,2}) # Return 403 Forbidden header and show the content of the root homepage RewriteRule .* index.php [F] # ## End - Rewrite rules to block out some common exploits. ## Begin - Custom redirects # # If you need to redirect some pages, or set a canonical non-www to # www redirect (or vice versa), place that code here. Ensure those # redirects use the correct RewriteRule syntax and the [R=301,L] flags. # ## End - Custom redirects ## # Uncomment following line if your webserver's URL # is not directly related to physical file paths. # Update Your Joomla! Directory (just / for root). ## # RewriteBase / RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^GET.*index\.php [NC] RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} !/system/.* RewriteRule (.*?)index\.php/*(.*) /$1$2 [R=301,L] RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^GET ## Begin - Joomla! core SEF Section. # RewriteRule .* - [E=HTTP_AUTHORIZATION:%{HTTP:Authorization}] # # If the requested path and file is not /index.php and the request # has not already been internally rewritten to the index.php script RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/index\.php # and the request is for something within the component folder, # or for the site root, or for an extensionless URL, or the # requested URL ends with one of the listed extensions RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} /component/|(/[^.]*|\.(php|html?|feed|pdf|vcf|raw))$ [NC] # and the requested path and file doesn't directly match a physical file RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f # and the requested path and file doesn't directly match a physical folder RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d # internally rewrite the request to the index.php script RewriteRule .* index.php [L] # ## End - Joomla! core SEF Section. <FilesMatch "\.(ico|pdf|flv|jpg|ttf|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|js|css|swf)$"> Header set Expires "Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:00:00 GMT" Header set Cache-Control "public" </FilesMatch> <ifModule mod_headers.c> Header set Connection keep-alive </ifModule> ########## Begin - Remove Etags # FileETag none # ########## End - Remove Etags

    Read the article

  • DMV {dm_os_ring_buffers} - Queries to help pinpoint current Issues / usual usage patterns

    - by NeilHambly
    I'm been running some queries (below) to help me identify when I have had time-sensitive performance issues around Memory/CPU, I didn't want to load up additional overhead to the system (unless absolutely neccessary) using traces or profiler  - naturally we have various methods to do this Perfmon counters, DBCC, DMVs etc.. One quick way I like is to run a few DMV queries (normally back in seconds) to help me find those RECENT specific time periods when the system has been substantially changed in some way using, this is using the DMV dm_os_ring_buffers This one helps me identify when I'm expericing Timeout Errors (1222).. modiy code to look for other error as highlight belowDECLARE @ts_now BIGINT,@dt_max BIGINT, @dt_min BIGINT  SELECT @ts_now = cpu_ticks / CONVERT(FLOAT, cpu_ticks_in_ms) FROM sys.dm_os_sys_info SELECT @dt_max = MAX(timestamp), @dt_min = MIN(timestamp)    FROM sys.dm_os_ring_buffers WHERE ring_buffer_type = N'RING_BUFFER_EXCEPTION'  SELECT       record_id      ,DATEADD(ms, -1 * (@ts_now - [timestamp]), GETDATE()) AS EventTime      ,y.Error      ,UserDefined      ,b.description as NormalizedText FROM       (       SELECT       record.value('(./Record/@id)[1]', 'int')                    AS record_id,       record.value('(./Record/Exception/Error)[1]', 'int')        AS Error,       record.value('(./Record/Exception/UserDefined)[1]', 'int')  AS UserDefined,      TIMESTAMP       FROM             (             SELECT TIMESTAMP, CONVERT(XML, record) AS record             FROM sys.dm_os_ring_buffers             WHERE ring_buffer_type = N'RING_BUFFER_EXCEPTION'             AND record LIKE '% %'            ) AS x      ) AS y INNER JOIN sys.sysmessages b on y.Error = b.error WHERE b.msglangid = 1033 and  y.Error = 1222 ORDER BY record_id DESC Sample Output record_id EventTime Error UserDefined NormalizedText 15199195 18/03/2010 14:00 1222 0 Lock request time out period exceeded. 15199194 18/03/2010 14:00 1222 0 Lock request time out period exceeded. 15199193 18/03/2010 14:00 1222 0 Lock request time out period exceeded. 15199192 18/03/2010 14:00 1222 0 Lock request time out period exceeded. 15199191 18/03/2010 14:00 1222 0 Lock request time out period exceeded.  This one helps me identify when I have Unusally High Processing (> 50%) or # Page-FaultsSELECT record.value('(./Record/@id)[1]', 'int') AS record_id,record.value('(./Record/SchedulerMonitorEvent/SystemHealth/SystemIdle)[1]', 'int')              AS SystemIdle,record.value('(./Record/SchedulerMonitorEvent/SystemHealth/ProcessUtilization)[1]', 'int')      AS SQLProcessUtilization,record.value('(./Record/SchedulerMonitorEvent/SystemHealth/UserModeTime)[1]', 'bigint')         AS UserModeTime,record.value('(./Record/SchedulerMonitorEvent/SystemHealth/KernelModeTime)[1]', 'bigint')       AS KernelModeTime,record.value('(./Record/SchedulerMonitorEvent/SystemHealth/PageFaults)[1]', 'bigint')           AS PageFaults,record.value('(./Record/SchedulerMonitorEvent/SystemHealth/WorkingSetDelta)[1]', 'bigint')      AS WorkingSetDelta,record.value('(./Record/SchedulerMonitorEvent/SystemHealth/MemoryUtilization)[1]', 'int')       AS MemoryUtilization,TIMESTAMPFROM (        SELECT TIMESTAMP, CONVERT(XML, record) AS record         FROM sys.dm_os_ring_buffers         WHERE ring_buffer_type = N'RING_BUFFER_SCHEDULER_MONITOR'        AND record LIKE '% %'         ) AS x Example: Showing entries > 50% SQL CPU record_id SystemIdle SQLProcessUtilization UserModeTime KernelModeTime PageFaults WorkingSetDelta MemoryUtilization TIMESTAMP 111916 66 29 36718750 1374843750 21333 -40960 100 7991061289 111917 54 41 50156250 1954062500 26914 -28672 100 7991121290 111918 57 39 42968750 1838437500 30096 20480 100 7991181290 111919 41 53 43906250 2530156250 22088 -4096 100 7991241307 111920 48 45 40937500 2124062500 26395 8192 100 7991301310 111921 52 43 35625000 2052812500 21996 155648 100 7991361311 111922 40 55 36875000 2637343750 33355 -262144 100 7991421311 111923 36 58 44843750 2786562500 47019 28672 100 7991481311 111924 31 64 53437500 3046562500 31027 61440 100 7991541314 111925 36 57 43906250 2711250000 37074 -8192 100 7991601317 111926 52 43 43437500 2060156250 29176 20480 100 7991661318 111927 71 24 33750000 1141250000 14478 16384 100 7991721320 111928 71 23 34531250 1116250000 12711 -20480 100 7991781320 111929 53 36 46562500 1714062500 26684 200704 100 7991841323 Finally one to provide some understanding of the level of memory state changes that are ocuringSELECT record.value('(./Record/@id)[1]', 'int')                                                       AS 'record_id',record.value('(./Record/ResourceMonitor/Notification)[1]', 'VARCHAR(100)')                     AS 'ReservedMemory',record.value('(./Record/ResourceMonitor/Indicators)[1]', 'int')                                AS 'Indicators',record.value('(./Record/ResourceMonitor/Effect/@state)[1]', 'VARCHAR(100)')         + ' - ' + record.value('(./Record/ResourceMonitor/Effect/@reversed)[1]', 'VARCHAR(100)')      + ' - ' + record.value('(./Record/ResourceMonitor/Effect)[1]', 'VARCHAR(100)')                           AS 'APPLY-HIGHPM',record.value('(./Record/ResourceMonitor/Effect/@state)[2]', 'VARCHAR(100)')         + ' - ' + record.value('(./Record/ResourceMonitor/Effect/@reversed)[2]', 'VARCHAR(100)')      + ' - ' + record.value('(./Record/ResourceMonitor/Effect)[2]', 'VARCHAR(100)')                           AS 'APPLY-HIGHPM',record.value('(./Record/ResourceMonitor/Effect/@state)[3]', 'VARCHAR(100)')         + ' - ' + record.value('(./Record/ResourceMonitor/Effect/@reversed)[3]', 'VARCHAR(100)')      + ' - ' + record.value('(./Record/ResourceMonitor/Effect)[3]', 'VARCHAR(100)')                           AS 'REVERT_HIGHPM',record.value('(./Record/MemoryNode/ReservedMemory)[1]', 'int')                                 AS 'ReservedMemory',record.value('(./Record/MemoryNode/CommittedMemory)[1]', 'int')                                AS 'CommittedMemory',record.value('(./Record/MemoryNode/SharedMemory)[1]', 'int')                                   AS 'SharedMemory',record.value('(./Record/MemoryNode/AWEMemory)[1]', 'int')                                      AS 'AWEMemory',record.value('(./Record/MemoryNode/SinglePagesMemory)[1]', 'int')                              AS 'SinglePagesMemory',record.value('(./Record/MemoryNode/CachedMemory)[1]', 'int')                                   AS 'CachedMemory',record.value('(./Record/MemoryRecord/MemoryUtilization)[1]', 'int')                            AS 'MemoryUtilization',record.value('(./Record/MemoryRecord/TotalPhysicalMemory)[1]', 'int')                          AS 'TotalPhysicalMemory',record.value('(./Record/MemoryRecord/AvailablePhysicalMemory)[1]', 'int')                      AS 'AvailablePhysicalMemory',record.value('(./Record/MemoryRecord/TotalPageFile)[1]', 'int')                                AS 'TotalPageFile',record.value('(./Record/MemoryRecord/AvailablePageFile)[1]', 'int')                            AS 'AvailablePageFile',record.value('(./Record/MemoryRecord/TotalVirtualAddressSpace)[1]', 'bigint')                  AS 'TotalVirtualAddressSpace',record.value('(./Record/MemoryRecord/AvailableVirtualAddressSpace)[1]', 'bigint')              AS 'AvailableVirtualAddressSpace',record.value('(./Record/MemoryRecord/AvailableExtendedVirtualAddressSpace)[1]', 'bigint')      AS 'AvailableExtendedVirtualAddressSpace', TIMESTAMPFROM (        SELECT TIMESTAMP, CONVERT(XML, record) AS record         FROM sys.dm_os_ring_buffers         WHERE ring_buffer_type = N'RING_BUFFER_RESOURCE_MONITOR'        AND record LIKE '% %'        ) AS x  

    Read the article

  • Robots.txt and "Bad" Robots

    - by Lynda
    I understand robots.txt and its purpose. I have read some people saying that using a Robots.txt gives "bad" robots or robots who do not obey a robots.txt a way to access pages on your site that you do not want accessed. While I am not looking to get into a debate about that I do have a question: If I have a structure like this: /Folder/ /Sub-Folder 1/ /Sub-Folder 2/ (Note: There are no pages within /Folder/ only other folders.) If I Disallow: /Folder/ it will prevent "good" robots from accessing the directory and any contents within the sub-folders. While we know that bad robots will see the /Folder/ will they be able to see and acess the sub-folders and the pages within the subfolders if they are not listed in the robots.txt? (Note: I do not fully understand how robots good or bad crawl a site beyond using a robots.txt and links within the site.)

    Read the article

  • Retrieving only the first record or record at a certain index in LINQ

    - by vik20000in
    While working with data it’s not always required that we fetch all the records. Many a times we only need to fetch the first record, or some records in some index, in the record set. With LINQ we can get the desired record very easily with the help of the provided element operators. Simple get the first record. If you want only the first record in record set we can use the first method [Note that this can also be done easily done with the help of the take method by providing the value as one].     List<Product> products = GetProductList();      Product product12 = (         from prod in products         where prod.ProductID == 12         select prod)         .First();   We can also very easily put some condition on which first record to be fetched.     string[] strings = { "zero", "one", "two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "seven", "eight", "nine" };     string startsWithO = strings.First(s => s[0] == 'o');  In the above example the result would be “one” because that is the first record starting with “o”.  Also the fact that there will be chances that there are no value returned in the result set. When we know such possibilities we can use the FirstorDefault() method to return the first record or incase there are no records get the default value.        int[] numbers = {};     int firstNumOrDefault = numbers.FirstOrDefault();  In case we do not want the first record but the second or the third or any other later record then we can use the ElementAt() method. In the ElementAt() method we need to pass the index number for which we want the record and we will receive the result for that element.      int[] numbers = { 5, 4, 1, 3, 9, 8, 6, 7, 2, 0 };      int fourthLowNum = (         from num in numbers         where num > 5         select num )         .ElementAt(1); Vikram

    Read the article

  • How come the ls command prints in multiple columns on tty but only one column everywhere else?

    - by David Lou
    Even after using Unix-like OSes for a couple years, this behaviour still baffles me. When I use the ls command in a directory that has lots of files, the output is usually nicely formatted into multiple columns. Here's an example: $ ls a.txt C.txt f.txt H.txt k.txt M.txt p.txt R.txt u.txt W.txt z.txt A.txt d.txt F.txt i.txt K.txt n.txt P.txt s.txt U.txt x.txt Z.txt b.txt D.txt g.txt I.txt l.txt N.txt q.txt S.txt v.txt X.txt B.txt e.txt G.txt j.txt L.txt o.txt Q.txt t.txt V.txt y.txt c.txt E.txt h.txt J.txt m.txt O.txt r.txt T.txt w.txt Y.txt However, if I try to redirect the output to a file, or pipe it to another command, only a single column appears in the output. Using the same example directory as above, here's what I get when I pipe ls to wc: $ ls | wc 52 52 312 In other words, wc thinks there are 52 lines, even though the output to the terminal has only 5. I haven't observed this behaviour in any other command. Would you like to explain this to me?

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu and Windows 8 shared partition gets corrupted

    - by Bruno-P
    I have a dual boot (Ubuntu 12.04 and Windows 8) system. Both systems have access to an NTFS "DATA" partition which contains all my images, documents, music and some application data like Chrome and Thunderbird Profiles which used by both OS. Everything was working fine in my Dual boot Ubuntu/Windows 7, but after updating to Windows 8 I am having a lot of troubles. First, sometimes, I add some files from Ubuntu into my DATA partition but they don't show up in Windows. Sometimes, I can't even use the DATA partition from Windows. When I try to save a file it gives an error "The directory or file is corrupted or unreadable". I need to run checkdisk to fix it but after some time, same error appears. Before upgrading to Windows 8 I also installed a new hard drive and copied the old data using clonezilla (full disk clone). Here is the log of my last chkdisk: Chkdsk was executed in read/write mode. Checking file system on D: Volume dismounted. All opened handles to this volume are now invalid. Volume label is DATA. CHKDSK is verifying files (stage 1 of 3)... Deleted corrupt attribute list entry with type code 128 in file 67963. Unable to find child frs 0x12a3f with sequence number 0x15. The attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x1097b has allocated length of 0x560000 instead of 0x427000. Deleted corrupt attribute list entry with type code 128 in file 67963. Unable to locate attribute with instance tag 0x2 and segment reference 0x1e00000001097b. The expected attribute type is 0x80. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 67963. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x3 is cross linked starting at 0x2431b2 for possibly 0x20 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x3 in file 0x1791e is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 96542. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x4 is cross linked starting at 0x6bc7 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x4 in file 0x17e83 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 97923. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x4 is cross linked starting at 0x1f7cec for possibly 0x5 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x4 in file 0x17eaf is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 97967. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x441bd7f for possibly 0x9 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x32085 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 204933. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4457850 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x320be is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 204990. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4859249 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3726b is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 225899. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x485d309 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3726c is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 225900. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x48a47de for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37286 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 225926. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x48ac80b for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37287 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 225927. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x48ae7ef for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37288 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 225928. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x48af7f8 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3728a is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 225930. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x48c39b6 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37292 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 225938. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x495d37a for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x372d7 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226007. Attribute record of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 is cross linked starting at 0x4d0bd38 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 in file 0x372dc is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (160, $I30) from file record segment 226012. Attribute record of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 is cross linked starting at 0x4c2d9bc for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 in file 0x372ed is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (160, $I30) from file record segment 226029. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4a4c1c3 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37354 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226132. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4a8e639 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37376 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226166. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4a8f6eb for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37379 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226169. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4ae1aa8 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37391 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226193. Attribute record of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 is cross linked starting at 0x4b00d45 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 in file 0x37396 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (160, $I30) from file record segment 226198. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4b02d50 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3739c is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226204. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4b3407a for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x373a8 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226216. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4bd8a1b for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x373db is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226267. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4bd9a28 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x373dd is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226269. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4c2fb24 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x373f3 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226291. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cb67e9 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37424 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226340. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cba829 for possibly 0x2 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37425 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226341. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cbe868 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37427 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226343. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cbf878 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37428 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226344. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cc58d8 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3742a is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226346. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4ccc943 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3742b is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226347. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cd199b for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3742d is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226349. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cd29a8 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3742f is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226351. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cd39b8 for possibly 0x2 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37430 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226352. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cd49c8 for possibly 0x2 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37432 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226354. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cd9a16 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37435 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226357. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cdca46 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37436 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226358. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4ce0a78 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37437 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226359. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4ce6ad9 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3743a is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226362. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cebb28 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3743b is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226363. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4ceeb67 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3743d is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226365. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cf4bc6 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3743e is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226366. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cfbc3a for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37440 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226368. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cfcc48 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37442 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226370. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4d02ca9 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37443 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226371. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4d06ce8 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37444 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226372. Attribute record of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 is cross linked starting at 0x4d9a608 for possibly 0x2 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 in file 0x37449 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (160, $I30) from file record segment 226377. Attribute record of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 is cross linked starting at 0x4d844ab for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 in file 0x3744b is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (160, $I30) from file record segment 226379. Attribute record of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 is cross linked starting at 0x4d6c32b for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 in file 0x3744c is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (160, $I30) from file record segment 226380. Attribute record of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 is cross linked starting at 0x4d2af25 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 in file 0x3744e is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (160, $I30) from file record segment 226382. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4d0fd78 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37451 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226385. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4d16ef8 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x8 Can anyone help? Thank you

    Read the article

  • Need assistance making a batch file for renaming files in separate folders

    - by Carnaxus
    Ok, here's one for you. I'm trying to use a batch file to rename a bunch of files, but none of them are in the same folder as the batch file itself. The command prompt keeps telling me that the directory can't be found. I suppose I could just rename all the files in all the folders that match the filename, but I don't want to do that either; I only want to change certain ones. My batch file as it stands is: @echo off ren "engine/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "gravplating/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "HAWX content/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "laserz/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "NeuroNaval/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "NeuroPlanes/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "NeuroTanks/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "NeuroWeapons/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "WAC Base/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "WAC DamageSystem/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "WAC GravityController/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "WAC Helicopters/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "WAC Sweps/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "weapons/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "AFF_ships/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "AntiTakeRifle/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "Catmull-Rom Cameras/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "Displacer Cannon/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "Drumdevil's Trains/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "EVEOnline/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "gm_botmap_v3/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "gm_construct_flatgrass_v5-2/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "gm_mobenix_v3_final/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "gm_mobenix_v3_highquality_Water/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "gm_snabbansairfield_b1/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "gm_XhS_construct/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "linedraw/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "ModelManipulator/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "NeuroCars/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "Propeller Engine/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "VanDookie and Predaaator's pack/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "WAC ECM/info.txt" "disabled.txt" ren "WAC Extra Helicopters/info.txt" "disabled.txt" echo Done! pause

    Read the article

  • Different robots.txt for two different domains point to same folder

    - by Ali
    Hi, I have the following two domains: domain.com test.domain.com Both point to same folder which is "public_html". What I want is a different robots.txt file for each domain. So when someone browse domain.com/robots.txt then a different file is shown. And when someone go to test.domain.com/robots.txt then a different file is shown. How can I do this using URL rewriting in .htacces? Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to remove old robots.txt from google as old file block the whole site

    - by KnowledgeSeeker
    I have a website which still shows old robots.txt in the google webmaster tools. User-agent: * Disallow: / Which is blocking Googlebot. I have removed old file updated new robots.txt file with almost full access & uploaded it yesterday but it is still showing me the old version of robots.txt Latest updated copy contents are below User-agent: * Disallow: /flipbook/ Disallow: /SliderImage/ Disallow: /UserControls/ Disallow: /Scripts/ Disallow: /PDF/ Disallow: /dropdown/ I submitted request to remove this file using Google webmaster tools but my request was denied I would appreciate if someone can tell me how i can clear it from the google cache and make google read the latest version of robots.txt file.

    Read the article

  • robots.txt not updated

    - by Haridharan
    I have updated some url's and files in robots.txt file to block url's and files from google search results but, still files displaying in search results. As per a suggestion from a site I tried to update the robots.txt by below steps. In Google Webmaster tools, Health - Fetch as Google - type the url and click the fetch button. but, still files displaying in search results. Note: in Google Webmaster tools, Health - Blocked URL's - robots.txt file - downloaded date looks two dates back.

    Read the article

  • Recovering from an incorrectly deployed robots.txt?

    - by Doug T.
    We accidentally deployed a robots.txt from our development site that disallowed all crawling. This has caused traffic to dip dramatically, and google results to report: A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt – learn more. We've since corrected the robots.txt about a 1.5 weeks ago, and you can see our robots.txt here. However, search results still report the same robots.txt message. The same appears to be true for Bing. We've taken the following action: Submitted site to be recrawled through google webmaster tools Submitted a site map to google (basically doing everything possible to say "Hey we're here! and we're crawlable!") Indeed a lot of crawl activity seems to be happening lately, but still no description is crawled. I noticed this question where the problem was specific to a 303 redirect back to a disallowed path. We are 301 redirecting to /blog, but crawling is allowed here. This redirect is due to a site redesign, wordpress paths for posts such as /2012/02/12/yadda yadda have been moved to /blog/2012/02/12. We 301 redirect to wordpress for /blog to keep our google juice. However, the sitemap we submitted might have /blog URLs. I'm not sure how much this matters. We clearly want to preserve google juice for URLs linked to us from before our redesign with the /2012/02/... URLs. So perhaps this has prevented some content from getting recrawled? How can we get all of our content, with links pointed to our site from pre-and-post redesign reporting descriptions? How can we resolve this problem and get our search traffic back to where it used to be?

    Read the article

  • www a-record vs cname-record

    - by Sorin Buturugeanu
    Hi! I have a website that I will be hosting DNS for (testing purposes at first and then it will have some limited traffic). I have set up DNS so that site.tld has an A record to the actual IP but I don't know what to do about www.site.tld. Both site.tld and www.site.tld will point to the same server / application so my logic tells me to add a cname record so that www.site.tld becomes an alias for site.tld, BUT, I've been checking my settings with intodns.com and if I only add a CNAME for the www.site.tld it gives me the following error: ERROR: I could not get any A records for www.cexa.ro! (the error clears once I do an A record for www.site.tld to point to the actual IP) I don't know if there is a "rule" that "www." should always be an A record even though it's actually pointing to the same IP / application. Thanks for helping me understand this!

    Read the article

  • Wildcard 'A' record overriding CNAME record

    - by user116890
    I have a Wildcard * A record for self-registration of subdomains by users on our web app. All works fine. I now need to set up an alias for support.mydomain.com to point to mydomain.freshdesk.com. I created a CNAME record as per instructions however it appears my Wildcard A record is overriding the CNAME entry. Any thoughts on how to resolve this? I need the wildcard so creating an A record for each user subdomain is not possible. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • URL blocked in robots.txt but still showing up on Google search [closed]

    - by Ahmad Alfy
    Possible Duplicate: Why do Google search results include pages disallowed in robots.txt? In my robots.txt I am disallowing a lot of URLs. Google webmaster tools says there're +750 URL blocked. The problem is the URLs are still showing on Google search. For example I have the following rule: Disallow: /entity/child-health/ But when I search some-keyword + child health the following URL shows up : http://www.sitename.com/entity/child-health/ Am I doing anything wrong? Is is possible for a URL to be blocked using robots.txt and still show up on search results?

    Read the article

  • Restricting crawler activity to certain directories with robots.txt

    - by neimad
    I would like to use robots.txt to prevent indexing of some parts of my website. I want search engines to index only the / directory and not search inside my controllers. In my robots.txt, I have this: User-Agent: * Disallow: /compagnies/ Disallow: /floors/ Disallow: /spaces/ Disallow: /buildings/ Disallow: /users/ Disallow: / I put this file in /mysite/public. I tested the file with a robots.txt validator and got no errors. However, Google always returns the result of my site. For testing, I added Disallow: /, but again, Google indexed all pages. floors, spaces, buildings, etc. are not physical directories. Is this a bug? How can I work around it?

    Read the article

  • Is my robots.txt working as it should?

    - by TigerBlood
    I want crawlers to have access to http://www.example.com but not http://www.example.com/ My robots.txt is as follows: User-agent: * Allow: /$ Disallow: / My site is in google search results, but I am not coming up in Bing, Yahoo, etc. I have had the same robots.txt since last year, and I initially requested inclusion ~1 year ago, having also resubmitted the URL to those latter search engines several times since as well. Is my robots.txt blocking those other crawlers? And if so, why not google as well? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Robots.txt Disallow command [on hold]

    - by Saahil Sinha
    How to disallow folders through Robots.txt, which are been crawled due to wrong url structure, which thus cause duplicate page error The URL been crawled as incorrectly by Google leading to duplicate page error: www.abc.com/forum/index.php?option=com_forum However, The actual correct pages however are: www.abc.com/index.php?option=com_forum Is this a correct way by excluding them through robots.txt: To exclude www.abc.com/forum/index.php?option=com_forum Below is command Disallow: /forum/ Will it not block in legitimate component folder 'Forum' of site?

    Read the article

  • Sending an Email from 2 Mail Servers

    - by Ted Smith
    We are currently attempting to move away from using a "local" mail(exchange) server to an cloud based offering for all our automated emails. The problem is that we send and receive thousands for emails a day and its uptime is quite critical so the business do not want to put all their eggs in one basket, so if we would like to use a cloud based offering(mailgun) they would like a backup if this goes down. So my question is: Would it be possible to set multpile A, TXT and CNAME records to multiple IP address so if one mail server goes down we can automatically start sending emails from the fallover(without them being blocked doing a reverse DNS lookup)? I know we will still need to adjust the MX record for incoming emails but that is acceptable to not receive emails for a short(1-2 hours) of time. Does this make sense?

    Read the article

  • Google indexing page with parameters but page is Disallowed in robots.txt

    - by Jakobud
    I have the following in robots.txt: User-agent: * Disallow: /refer.php User-agent: NinjaBot Allow: / Sitemap: http://www.mysite.com/sitemap.xml The refer.php file does various things depending on what GET parameters are passed to it. When I do a Google search, I see tons of results for pages like this: http://www.mysite.com/refer.php?o=23945 http://www.mysite.com/refer.php?o=39858 http://www.mysite.com/refer.php?o=9683 http://www.mysite.com/refer.php?o=10569 http://www.mysite.com/refer.php?o=58304 http://www.mysite.com/refer.php?o=69604 Is the reason that Google is indexing these because I don't have an asterisk * after refer.php in the robots.txt ? Should changing it to Disallow: /refer.php* fix the problem?

    Read the article

  • Robots.txt never downloaded but some blocked URLs in GWT

    - by Zistoloen
    There is something I don't understand in Google Webmaster Tools (GWT) for my Wordpress site. In menu "Blocked URLs", it mention that my robots.txt has never been downloaded but there are some blocked URLs. It's kind of weird and not logical. Am i missing something? User-agent : * Disallow: /*? Disallow: /wp-login.php Disallow: /wp-admin Disallow: /wp-includes Disallow: /wp-content Allow: /wp-content/uploads Disallow: */trackback Disallow: /*/feed Disallow: /*/comments Disallow: /cgi-bin Disallow: /*.php$ Disallow: /*.inc$ Disallow: /*.gz$ Disallow: /*.cgi$ Disallow: /author/* I'm afraid my robots.txt doesn't block several URLs I want to block.

    Read the article

  • HTTP 303 redirection and robots.txt

    - by Ian Dickinson
    On a site I'm working on, we're using the HTTP 303 redirect pattern (see this article for background) to distinguish between information and non-information resources. So: some URL's under /id get redirected to dynamically-created pages under /doc. These dynamic pages are built from a database, and contain links to other /doc/ resources, so in general we don't want them to be crawled. Our robots.txt contains: Disallow: /doc However, we do want the non-redirected pages under /id to get indexed by Google et al: Allow: /id So the question I have, which I can't find an answer to so far, is: if an allowed /id page 303-redirects to a /doc page, will it still be blocked by robots.txt? If yes, we're OK, but otherwise I'm going to disallow all /id resources in the robots file, as having the crawler hammer the db would be worse than losing search indexing for the /id pages.

    Read the article

  • How to secure robots.txt file?

    - by CompilingCyborg
    I would like for User-agents to index my relative pages only without accessing any directory on my server. As initial thought, i had this version in mind: User-agent: * Disallow: */* Sitemap: http://www.mydomain.com/sitemap.xml My Questions: Is it correct to block all directories like that - Disallow: */*? Would still search engines be able to see and index my sitemap if i disallowed all directories? What are the best practices for securing the robots.txt file? For Reference: Here is a good tutorial for robots.txt #Add this if you want to stop Alexa from indexing your site. User-agent: ia_archiver Disallow: / #Add this to stop duggmirror User-agent: duggmirror Disallow: / #Add this to allow specific agents User-agent: Googlebot Disallow: #Add this to allow all agents while blocking specific directories User-agent: * Disallow: /cgi-bin/ Disallow: /*?*

    Read the article

  • My First robots.txt

    - by Whitechapel
    I'm creating my first robots.txt and wanted to get a second opinion on it. Basically I have a FTP setup on my board for some special users to transfer files between each other and I do NOT want that included in the search by the bots. I also want to point to my sitemap which gets auto generated by a PHP page. So here is what I have, what else should I include, and if I need to fix anything with it? Also, it's linking to xmlsitemap.php because that generates the sitemap when called. My goal is to allow any search bot crawl the forums to grab meta data. User-agent: * Disallow: /admin/ Disallow: /ali/ Disallow: /benny/ Disallow: /cgi-bin/ Disallow: /ders/ Disallow: /empire/ Disallow: /komodo_117/ Disallow: /xanxan/ Disallow: /zeroordie/ Disallow: /tmp/ Sitemap: http://www.vivalanation.com/forums/xmlsitemap.php Edit, I'm not sure how to handle all the user's folders under /public_html/ since the robots.txt will be going in /public_html.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >